Search

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and prognosis of de novo CRC patients who underwent liver or kidney transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 66 de novo CRC patients selected from 8,734 liver transplant (LT) or kidney transplant (KT) recipients. We analyzed characteristics and survival outcomes of de novo CRC patients and sporadic CRC patients who underwent radical surgery with stage I-III in Asan Medical Center between 2005 and 2016. Survival outcomes were analyzed via the 1:4 matching method. The standard incidence ratio (SIR) of de novo CRC in KT recipients is 1.67 in men and 2.54 in women. That in LT recipients is 3.10 in men and 2.25 in women. Compared with sporadic CRC patients, de novo CRC patients had more colon cancer than rectal cancer (p=0.041). In 9 patients (13.6%), CRC was diagnosed within one year after transplantation, 21 patients (31.8%) were diagnosed between 1–5 years, and the remaining 36 patients (54.6%) were diagnosed thereafter. There were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups (p=0.211 and p=0.324, respectively). The risk of developing de novo CRC in transplant recipients was higher than in the general population. The survival outcome of de novo CRC was no different compared with the sporadic CRC. Therefore, regular surveillance is essential for timely diagnosis and treatment for transplantation patients. A large prospective study for an intense CRC surveillance program in transplantation patients is needed.

Type 2 diabetes develops in the presence of chronic overnutrition and genetic susceptibility, and causes insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency. We hypothesized that islet transplantation can improve insulin sensitivity by modifying the mediators of insulin sensitivity in the pancreas, liver, muscle, and adipose tissues. Eight-week-old male mice were used as both recipients and donors in this study. To induce type 2 diabetes with partial β-cell failure, the mice were fed a high-fat diet for 4 weeks and then injected with low-dose streptozotocin. Approximately 400 islet cells from a donor mouse were injected into the renal capsule of a recipient mouse for islet transplantation. After 6 weeks following transplantation, the mediators of insulin sensitivity in the pancreas, liver, muscle, and adipose tissues were quantitatively compared between islet-transplanted and non-transplanted groups. Intravenous glucose tolerance test showed that whereas the non-transplanted mice failed to show notable reductions in the glucose level, the islet-transplanted mice showed significant reductions in the serum glucose level to ~200 mg/dL at 6 weeks after islet transplantation. The islet-transplanted mice showed significantly higher Matsuda index and significantly lower HOMA-IR than did the non-transplanted mice, thus signifying improved insulin sensitivity. Islet transplantation resulted in improvements in multiple indices of insulin sensitivity in a murine model of type 2 diabetes. Islet transplantation may be utilized to improve insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes.

We evaluated the effectiveness of IGRA-based isoniazid (INH) treatment with the diagnostic value of quantitative IGRA titer for post-transplant tuberculosis (TB) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients.All adult KT recipients were enrolled from January 2014 to December 2017. The development of TB after KT was observed, stratified by quantitative IGRA results as well as by IGRA results with/without INH treatment.Of 1150 KT recipients, 322 (28%) revealed positive IGRA results (≥0.35 IU/mL) and 12 (1.0%) developed TB. Seven (3.2%) of 217 patients with positive IGRA without INH developed TB, whereas none of 105 patients with positive IGRA with INH developed TB (rate difference -1616 per 100,000 person-years, P = 0.016) and 5 (0.6%) of 828 patients with negative or indeterminate IGRA developed TB (rate difference -1388 per 100,000 person-years, P0.001). Among the 217 positive IGRA patients without INH, 6 (6.4%) of 94 patients who had positive IGRA titer2.96 IU/mL developed TB, whereas one (0.8%) of 123 patients who had positive IGRA titer≤2.96 IU/mL developed TB (rate difference 2964 per 100,000 person-years, P = 0.017).IGRA-based INH treatment with risk stratification by quantitative IGRA results appears to be effective to prevent the development of TB in KT recipients.

Background/Aims: We evaluated the usefulness in kidney transplant (KT) candidates of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays for predicting the development of post-transplant CMV infections. Methods: All adult recipients admitted for living-donor KT between March 2014 and March 2015 were prospectively enrolled except donor CMV-seropositive and recipient seronegative (D+/R-) recipients. All the enrolled patients underwent CMV-specific ELISPOT assays before transplant, and a researcher blinded to the results of these assays examined the patients for CMV infection at least 6 months post-transplant. Results: Of 133 KT recipients, 44 (33%) developed CMV infections. When we used the cut-off determined by receiver operator characteristic curve, 16 of the 34 patients (47%) with negative pp65-specific ELISPOT results (< 11 spots/200,000 cells) developed CMV infections, whereas 28 of the 99 patients (39%) with positive pp65-specific ELISPOT results at baseline (≥ 11 spots/200,000 cells) developed CMV infections after KT (p = 0.02). Based on the multivariable Cox regression model, negative pp65-specific ELISPOT assay results was an independent risk factor for CMV infection (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 3.46; p = 0.047) as well as age (AHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.08; p = 0.007). Conclusions: Pre-transplant CMV-specific ELISPOT assay appears to predict the development of CMV infections after KT in recipients at moderate risk such as CMV-seropositive recipients (Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT 02025335).

Background Recent advances in desensitization techniques and immunosuppressive therapy have led to improved outcomes after ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) kidney transplantation (KT). However, questions remain unanswered, particularly regarding which type of ABO isoagglutinin-immunoglobulin M (IgM) or immunoglobulin M (IgG)-is significantly involved in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Study design and methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 120 patients who underwent ABO-i KT between 2012 and 2014. Preoperative plasma exchange was performed until the IgM isoagglutinin titer was 4 or less, regardless of the IgG titer. Clinical data were compared between patient groups with pre-KT IgG isoagglutinin titer 16 or greater (high IgG; titer range, 16-256; n = 39) and 8 or less (low IgG; titer range, -8; n = 81). Results The median follow-up periods were 59 (high IgG) and 55 (low IgG) months. Patient survival at 5 years (p = 0.314) was 100% (high IgG) and 97.4% (low IgG). Graft survival at 5 years (p = 0.480) was 100% (high IgG) and 98.7% (low IgG). AMR by anti-ABO antibody occurred in only one patient in the low-IgG group. Conclusion Patients with high pre-KT IgG isoagglutinin titers had equally successful outcomes as those with low IgG titers. ABO-i KT can be successfully performed by reducing the pre-KT IgM isoagglutinin titer to 4 or less, as determined by the immediate spin tube method.

Objective We compared the clinical outcomes of recipients of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) according to the blood group of the plasma transfused. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 60 recipients of ABOi-KT with blood type O and A or B donors. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between 2 groups of recipients: 1 group received AB plasma regardless of the donor’s blood type (n = 30), and the other group received donor-type plasma (n = 30). Results There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics. Transfusion of donor-type plasma was noninferior to transfusion of type AB plasma in terms of both rejection-free survival and rejection rate (P = .455, P = .335). Conclusion There was no significant prognostic difference between the 2 groups. In terms of blood supply and inventory management, we suggest that the blood group of the plasma should match the donor’s type.

We analyzed the efficacy and safety of an everolimus with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR+rCNI) versus mycophenolic acid with standard-exposure CNI (MPA+sCNI) regimen in Asian patients from the TRANSFORM study. In this 24-month, open-label study, de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTxRs) were randomized (1:1) to receive EVR+rCNI or MPA+sCNI, along with induction therapy and corticosteroids. Of the 2037 patients randomized in the TRANSFORM study, 293 were Asian (EVR+rCNI, N = 136; MPA+sCNI, N = 157). At Month 24, EVR+rCNI was noninferior to MPA+sCNI for the binary endpoint of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited kidney disease, leading to kidney failure. One of the most serious extrarenal complications of ADPKD is comorbid intracranial aneurysms. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence, rupture rate, and treatment outcomes of intracranial aneurysms in ADPKD. Adult patients with a documented diagnosis of ADPKD who received kidney transplantation at our center from January 1994 to December 2018 were included in the study. Medical history, physical examination, laboratory findings, imaging studies, and operation records were collected and analyzed from our database. Among 154 kidney transplant recipients with ADPKD, 113 (73.4%) patients were screened for intracranial aneurysms preoperatively. Twenty three patients (14.9%) had intracranial aneurysms with mean diameter size of 4.5 ± 2.7 mm. Nine patients (5.8%) experienced aneurysm rupture and the mean age at time of rupture was 34.9 ± 9.3 years. Twelve patients (52.2%) presented with multiple aneurysms. The most common aneurysm location was the bifurcation of the middle cerebral artery (34.9%). Clipping was the most common treatment in both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Intracranial aneurysms are more frequent in patients with ADPKD, and the average age of intracranial artery rupture in patients with ADPKD is earlier than in the general population. It is necessary to consider proper evaluation and management of intracranial aneurysms when counseling ADPKD patients who will undergo kidney transplantation.

AIM ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) has become a routine procedure with graft survival rates comparable to those of ABO-compatible KT. However, the clinical significance of the isoagglutinin titre in ABOi KT remains uncertain. Therefore, in this study, we analysed the clinical outcomes of ABOi KT according to the baseline and post-operative isoagglutinin titre. METHODS All patients who received ABOi KT between 2009 and 2013 were reviewed and followed up until December 2016. The patients were classified according to baseline (

Summary: Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the link between PTLD incidence and its occurrence time in patients at a single center in comparable medical environments after 2000. Methods: Retrospectively, total 3305 kidney transplantation patients medical data were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the period from the day of kidney transplantation to the day of PTLD diagnosis. Early-onset was defined as PTLD development within two years after transplantation, whereas all other cases were categorized as late-onset PTLD. Results: In the early-onset group, young age (0–19 years) was confirmed as a risk factor for PTLD incidence (HR 1.49, p = 0.038). In the late-onset group, history of anti-rejection therapy was confirmed as a risk factor (HR 1.32, p = 0.031). Overall survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.556). Graft survival rates were also not different between the two groups (p = 0.549). Conclusion: When patients with PTLD were classified into early-onset group and late-onset group at two years, overall survival and graft survival were comparable. And patients with early-onset PTLD are more likely to be associated with EBV, the late-onset patients are more likely to be immunosuppressed. Keywords: Kidney transplantation, Risk factors, Immunocompromised host

BACKGROUND The permissible extent of pretransplant dialysis for patient and allograft survival is unclear. We assumed that a short period of dialysis before living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) will show the similar results as preemptive kidney transplantation (PKT). MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of LDKT according to pretransplant dialysis duration in both unmatched cohorts (n=1984) and propensity-score-matched cohorts (n=986) cohorts. The primary study endpoint was post-transplantation patient survival and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) according to the duration of pretransplant dialysis by 19 months which was the best cutoff value to differentiate clinical outcomes with the use of the time-dependent area under the curve. RESULTS Of 1984 patients with LDKT at our center between January 2005 and September 2016, PKT was performed in 429 patients. The durations of pretransplant dialysis were

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess posttransplant changes in insulin sensitivity and β-cell function of pancreas transplant recipients according to the type of diabetes mellitus (DM) and the pretransplant insulin sensitivity measured by the Matsuda Index (MI). METHODS We analyzed 60 patients who underwent pancreas transplantation and oral glucose tolerance test pretransplant and at 1 month posttransplant. RESULTS At 1 month posttransplant, insulin sensitivity did not show significant improvement; particularly, the MI was significantly lower after transplant in recipients with type 1 DM (T1DM) and those with pretransplant MI of 5 or greater. β-cell function was significantly improved after transplant in all recipients regardless of the type of DM and pretransplant MI values. Glucose control was significantly improved in recipients with T1DM and in all recipients regardless of the pretransplant MI values. Additional oral glucose tolerance test at 1 year posttransplant revealed that insulin sensitivity remained unimproved and β-cell function was higher compared with pretransplant. Glucose control had partially reverted to pretransplant levels in recipients with T1DM and those with pretransplant MI of 5 or greater. CONCLUSIONS Unlike β-cell function and glucose control, insulin sensitivity did not significantly improve until posttransplant 1 year after pancreas transplantation regardless of the type of DM or the degree of pretransplant insulin sensitivity.

Laboratory biomarkers that can differentiate non-infectious fever from infectious fever after pancreas transplantation have yet to be discovered. Non-infectious fever was defined as the presence of fever (>38.3°C) in the absence of a documented clinical diagnosis of infection or a positive culture. Among 184 consecutive recipients, a total of 91 recipients developed fever within 1-month post-transplant, of whom 46 had infectious fever and 45 had non-infectious fever at our center between August 2014 and July 2019. The onset of fever was earlier in the non-infectious fever group (14.4 ± 3.7 post-transplant days) compared with the infectious fever group (16.5 ± 5.8 post-transplant days; p = .033). Multivariate analysis showed that serum procalcitonin at the peak of fever could significantly differentiate infectious fever from non-infectious fever (OR 53.378, 95% CI: 6.819-417.802, p

Funder: Fondazione Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007368, Funder: Tuscany Region, Italy; Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009888, Funder: Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy, Funder: University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007514, The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

BACKGROUND Given that pregnancy is an immune-sensitizing event, female kidney transplant recipients who receive allografts from their offspring or husbands may have a higher risk of rejection and graft failure due to pre-sensitization acquired during pregnancy or childbirth. We investigated the association between donor relatedness (i.e., offspring, husband, unrelated) and graft survival among female living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) recipients with pregnancy histories. MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2009 to January 2018, a total of 2060 LDKTs were performed at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. After excluding HLA-incompatible transplantation, re-transplantation, and those without a clear history of childbirth, 390 female recipients were included and categorized into group I (offspring-to-mother, n=175), group II (husband-to-wife, n=159), and group III (unrelated, n=56). The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and graft survival. We also evaluated delayed graft function (DGF), death-censored graft failure, and mortality. RESULTS Group I had the lowest number of HLA mismatches (p

BACKGROUND Kidney donors may be at increased risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as well as cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. In particular, data on long-term safety after kidney donation in Asian populations are lacking. We aimed to assess the safety of live kidney donation in Korean donors by using a matched control group. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a hospital-based database (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea) and a control group from the national health insurance claims database in South Korea. We analyzed the health status of 1608 kidney donors who underwent donation between September 1990 and December 2015, and we compared their characteristics with those of matched 6426 non-donors (1: 4 ratio). We also measured the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with ⁵¹Cr EDTA and urinary albumin excretion and assessed the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and general health status in 200 volunteer donors. RESULTS Mortality was significantly lower in kidney donors compared with the matched controls (130.2 vs. 185.4 per 100,000 person-years, P=0.02). There was no significant difference in mortality if a donor had hypertension or was a current smoker at the time of donation. There was also no significant difference in ESRD (43.1 vs. 35.2 per 100,000 person-years, P=0.07) between the 2 groups regardless of hypertension and smoking status. Among the 200 donors with measured GFR, 11.5% had GFR values

Background: Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) has been established as the treatment of choice for patients with concurrent end-stage liver and end-stage kidney diseases. The objective of this study was to analyze the nationwide inci dence of SLKT in Korea and the outcomes of SLKT in a high-volume transplant center. Methods: Databases of the Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) and Asan Medical Center from 2000 to 2019 were retro spectively reviewed to determine the incidence of SLKT. Results: During 20 years from 2000 to 2019, deceased donor SLKT was performed for 38 cases in the KONOS database. The proportion of deceased donor SLKT was 0.6% (20 of 3,333) before adoption of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, which was significantly increased to 1.2% (18 of 1,524) after the adoption of MELD score (P=0.034). In our institution, there were 11 cases of SLKT (two cases with deceased donors and nine cases with living donors). SLKT accounted for 0.2% (11 of 6,468) of total liver transplantation volume. During follow-up, five patients died due to hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence (n=2), infection (n=2), or unknown cause (n=1). The 1-year and 10-year overall patient survival rates were 90.9% and 81.8%, respectively. Conclusions: Results of this study revealed that the incidence of deceased donor SLKT was very low. An increase of such inci dence is not anticipated unless the number of deceased donors is markedly increased. Currently, sequential living donor liver transplantation and kidney transplantation with deceased or living donors are mainstays of transplantation rather than SLKT in our institution.

Background Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a life-threatening fungal infection that can occur in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients. A growing number of KT recipients are receiving perioperative treatment with rituximab, which is associated with prolonged B-cell depletion and possible risk of PCP occurrence; however, the optimal prophylaxis duration according to rituximab treatment is yet unknown. We compared the occurrence of PCP and the duration of prophylaxis in KT recipients according to rituximab treatment. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 2110 patients who underwent KT between January 2009 and December 2016, who were divided into non-Rituximab group (n = 1588, 75.3%) and rituximab group (n = 522, 24.7%). Results In the rituximab group, the estimated number needed to treat (NNT) for prophylaxis prolongation from 6 to 12 months was 29.0 with a relative risk reduction of 90.0%. In the non-rituximab group, the estimated NNT value was 133.3 and the relative risk reduction was 66.4%. Rituximab treatment (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.09; P P = 0.03) were significant risk factors for PCP in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Our results suggest that maintaining PCP prophylaxis for 12 months may be beneficial in KT recipients treated with rituximab for desensitization or acute rejection treatment.

BACKGROUND Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is recommended. The aim of this study was to investigate incidence and risk factors for PCP in KTRs after 6-month TMP-SMX prophylaxis. METHODS We conducted a case-control study of patients with PCP who received 6-month PCP prophylaxis with TMP-SMX after kidney transplantation (KT). In cases of rejection, PCP prophylaxis was provided for six additional months after anti-rejection therapy. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was not considered an indication for PCP prophylaxis due to concerns of nephrotoxicity associated with TMP-SMX. RESULTS Among 3941 kidney or pancreas-kidney transplant recipients, 67 (1.7%) developed PCP after discontinuing TMP-SMX. A total of 47 patients with KT PCP and 94 controls were included. Duration of PCP prophylaxis was similar between cases and controls (median 6 months, P = .53). In multivariate analysis, rejection (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.4-11.1) and CMV infection (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.0-5.8) were independently associated with PCP development after TMP-SMX. Rejection or CMV infection was observed in 70% of patients with PCP. Time to PCP development after rejection (median [IQR] 6 [5-19] months) was slightly shorter than after CMV infection (median [IQR] 9 [5-12] months; P = .18). CONCLUSION Post-prophylaxis PCP occurred in

In TRANSFORM, de novo kidney transplant recipients received either everolimus in combination with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR+rCNI) at standard EVR pre-dose concentrations of 3���8 ng/mL or mycophenolic acid plus standard-exposure CNI (MPA+sCNI). The authors analyzed the incidence of wound healing adverse events (WHAEs) over the 2-year study period 15. Patients were randomized to either EVR+rCNI or MPA+sCNI, both combined with induction therapy and steroids 19. The safety population consisted of 2,026 patients (EVR+rCNI: 1,014, MPA+sCNI: 1,012). The proportion of patients with at least 1 WHAE was comparable between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI treatment groups [20.6% vs. 17.3%; risk ratio (RR): 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.43] at month 24. The numerical difference between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI was mainly caused by an increased proportion of EVR patients with lymphocele and wound dehiscence [7.5% vs. 5.1% (RR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.05) and 3.9% vs. 1.8% (RR: 2.22; 95%CI: 1.28, 3.84), respectively] 20. The immediate introduction of EVR+rCNI after kidney transplantation was associated with an overall comparable incidence of WHAEs versus current standard-of-care over the 24-month study period. There was an increased relative risk of experiencing lymphocele and wound dehiscence but the absolute risks were rather low in both groups 21. NCT01950819.

BACKGROUND BK nephropathy (BKN) affects graft function and increases the risk of graft failure. The reduction of immunosuppression is the main treatment for BKN. However, acute rejection may develop following immunosuppression reduction, and data regarding the risk factors of acute rejection during the post-reduction period are insufficient. MATERIAL AND METHODS Of 758 patients who received a kidney transplantation (KT) between 2008 and 2011, 79 who underwent immunosuppression reduction as BKN treatment were enrolled. The risk factors of acute rejection after immunosuppression reduction were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS During the median follow-up period (75 months), acute rejection developed in 21.5% of study group patients and in 22.5% of KT recipients without BKN. The rejection group showed a trend of higher body mass index (24.13±3.92 vs. 22.40±3.31 kg/m², P=0.070) and lower tacrolimus levels than the no rejection group, although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) doses were not lower in the rejection group. The rejection group showed worse graft survival than the no rejection group (P=0.001 by the log rank test). A greater number of patients in the rejection group exhibited reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) level by >20% at 1 month after initial BKV detection (34.2% vs. 7.9%, P=0.008). Multivariate analysis indicated that the peak BKV PCR level (odds ratio [OR], 0.136; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.025-0.732; P=0.020), MMF discontinuation (vs. MMF reduction; OR, 0.112; 95% CI, 0.020-0.618; P=0.012) and CNI level reduction >20% (OR, 33.752; 95% CI, 4.263-267.251; P=0.001) were significantly associated with acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS Acute rejection after immunosuppression reduction for BKN showed worse allograft survival than the patients without acute rejection. In addition, a CNI dose reduction >20% at 1 month after the initial BKV detection can increase the risk of acute rejection.

BACKGROUND The American Gastroenterological Association and European Association for the Study of the Liver recommend that hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive patients who receive immunosuppression should be monitored for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection regardless of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) status. However, anti-HBs may provide protection against infection. To investigate whether the presence of anti-HBs in addition to anti-HBc confers protection, we classified HBsAg(-) kidney transplantation (KT) patients into 4 groups according to anti-HBc and anti-HBs status, and compared the HBV infection rate between the anti-HBc(+)anti-HBs(+) group and the other 3 groups. METHODS In this single-center retrospective study, we classified 1959 patients into 4 groups: anti-HBc(-)anti-HBs(-) (n = 356), anti-HBc(-)anti-HBs(+) (n = 652), anti-HBc(+)anti-HBs(-) (n = 142), and anti-HBc(+)anti-HBs(+) (n = 809). RESULTS Hepatitis B virus infection was noted in 31 (1.6%) patients after KT. There was a significant difference in HBV infection rate between anti-HBc(+)anti-HBs(+) (1.2%) and anti-HBc(+)anti-HBs(-) (5.6%) (P < 0.001), but not between anti-HBc(+)anti-HBs(+) and anti-HBc(-)anti-HBs(-) (1.1%) or anti-HBc(-)anti-HBs(+) (1.4%). There was a significant difference in HBV infection rate according to anti-HBs titer, but no difference according to the donor viral profile. Hepatic failure occurred in 1 anti-HBc(+)anti-HBs(-) patient and 1 anti-HBc(+)anti-HBs(+) patient, both of whom died. Hepatocellular carcinoma was noted in 4 anti-HBc(-) patients, but not in anti-HBc(+) patients. CONCLUSIONS The presence of anti-HBs confers protection against HBV infection. We recommend monitoring for HBV infection after KT in HBsAg(-) anti-HBc(+) anti-HBs(-) patients, but not in HBsAg(-) anti-HBc(+) anti-HBs(+) patients.

Renal transplantation is widely accepted as the best therapeutic treatment modality for the patients with end stage renal disease. However sensitization to previous antigen exposure still remains one of the major clinical hurdles for successful kidney transplantation. In this book pre op evaluation for sensitized patients, pre op desensitization, post-transplant management, post-operative complications, and finally results are reviewed with our own data. As an introduction, this chapter deals with definition of sensitization, brief illustration of donor specific antibody(HLA and non HLA antibody), prevalence and cause of sensitization, and approach to the highly sensitized patients such as modification of deceased organ allocation system, acceptable mismatch program, and kidney paired exchange in addition to desensitization.

Sensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) has been one of the major clinical challenges for successful kidney transplantation. In end-stage renal disease, kidney transplantation provides benefits compared with dialysis in terms of improved patient survival better quality of life, and lower ongoing costs after the first year. Living donor kidney transplantation has an advantage with improved allograft survival, and performed earlier and electively compared with deceased donor transplantation. However sensitized patients are increasing in number on transplant waiting lists, and their prospect of getting a transplant is less than nonsensitized patients due to immunological incompatibility with the donor. Strategy for sensitized patients are listing for a compatible deceased donor transplant or, if they have a living donor, either selecting a kidney exchange program or undergoing a desensitization procedure. Desensitization procedures may be undertaken to increase access to either living or deceased donor transplants, and in some situations may also be employed to facilitate participation in a kidney exchange, in less immunological barrier to be overcome. The question of whether individuals are better off with a desensitization treatment followed by HLA-incompatible living donor transplantation or waiting on the deceased donor kidney transplant list for a compatible transplant has recently been addressed by two large multicenter studies, with conflicting results. A multicenter study from the United States published in the New England Journal of Medicine [365;318 326.2011] concluded that there was a strong survival benefit for sensitized patients undergoing desensitization followed by HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplant compared with those remaining on the waiting list. Of interest, a second study, published in the Lancet, [389;727 734.2017] found no significant survival advantage for desensitized patients compared with similar patients remaining on the waiting list in the United Kingdom. Controversies still remain regarding how desensitization can be achieved and which techniques are effective and safe.

BACKGROUND Although bladder drainage is effective for monitoring urine amylase levels to detect graft rejection, enteric drainage is performed more frequently. The optimal method for monitoring pancreatic enzyme secretions remains unclear. We investigated graft survival in recipients of bladder drainage and assessed the risk of graft rejection and failure after enteric conversion. MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 1999 to October 2015, we performed 318 pancreas transplantations at our institution. We enrolled 180 recipients who underwent pancreas transplantation with bladder drainage (82 underwent enteric conversion and the rest did not). RESULTS The mean interval between pancreas transplantation and enteric conversion was 20±24 months. The graft survival rate was significantly higher in the enteric conversion group for 10 years after pancreas transplantation than in the maintain bladder drainage group. After enteric conversion, 14 recipients lost graft function. The interval between enteric conversion and graft failure was 43±26 months. In the enteric conversion group, immediate postoperative thromboembolectomy (HR=12.729, p=0.000), renal failure (HR=5.710, p=0.005), pancreas graft rejection after EC (HR=19.006, p=0.000), and delayed graft function (HR=7.021, p=0.001) had a significant relationship with graft failure. CONCLUSIONS Enteric conversion can be safe and effective for improving short- and long-term graft survival if performed after approximately 9 months. Caution should be exercised with enteric conversion if recipients have a history of thromboembolectomy, delayed graft function, or renal failure.