Search

Background: The positivity of anti-RNP autoantibodies as biological criteria for the diagnosis of mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) has recently divided the rheumatology community. Autoantigenicity of the U1-snRNP complex tends to generate multiple autoantibodies against RNP-A, -C and -70 KDa or Sm proteins. The aim of this study is to identify the most informative autoantibodies in clinical practice, in particular, to contribute to differential diagnosis between MCTD and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Sera from 74 patients positive for anti-RNP autoantibodies were selected over a period of one year of laboratory practice. Autoantibodies directed against extractable nuclear antigen, RNP proteins (A, C, 70 KDa) and 40 kDa fragments of RNP-70 KDa were investigated by using quantitative fluoroenzymatic assay and Western blot analysis. Results: Among the 74 patients, 40 patients were diagnosed with SLE, 20 with MCTD, six with another autoimmune disease, three with SARS-CoV-2 infection, three with cancer and two were healthy. No preferential clinical association of IgG or IgM autoantibodies directed against each of the RNP proteins was found between SLE and MCTD. In contrast, the proportion of autoantibodies directed against the RNP component within the U1-snRNP complex showed a significantly higher RNP index in patients with MCTD than in those with SLE ( p = 0.011), with good performance (sensitivity: 69.2%, specificity: 88.9%). Conclusions: The analysis of the proportion of the different autoantibodies directed against the U1-snRNP complex is more informative than the analysis of each autoantibody separately. A follow-up of patients could be informative about the interest of the RNP index as a predictor of disease evolution.

Background and Objectives: Patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) receiving extended dosing of rituximab (RTX) have exhibited no return of disease activity, which suggests that maintenance of deep depletion of circulating B cells is not necessary to maintain the efficacy of RTX in MS., Methods: This was a prospective monocentric observational study including all consecutive PwMS who started or continued RTX after 2019, when the medical staff decided to extend the dosing interval up to 24 months for all patients. Circulating B-cell subsets were monitored regularly and systematically in case of relapse. The first extended interval was analyzed., Results: We included 236 PwMS (81% with relapsing-remitting MS; mean [SD] age 43 [12] years; median [range] EDSS score 4 [0-8]; mean relapse rate during the year before RTX start 1.09 [0.99]; 41.5% with MRI activity). The median number of RTX infusions before extension was 4 (1-13). At the time of the analysis, the median delay in dosing was 17 months (8-39); the median proportion of circulating CD19 + B cells was 7% (0-25) of total lymphocytes and that of CD27 + memory B cells was 4% (0-16) of total B cells. The mean annual relapse rate did not differ before and after the extension: 0.03 (0.5) and 0.04 (0.15) ( p = 0.51). Similarly, annual relapse rates did not differ before and after extension in patients with EDSS score ≤3 (n = 79) or disease duration ≤5 years (n = 71) at RTX onset. During the "extended dosing" period, MRI demonstrated no lesion accrual in 228 of the 236 patients (97%). Five patients experienced clinical relapse, which was confirmed by MRI. In these patients, the level of B-cell subset reconstitution at the time of the relapse did not differ from that for patients with the same extension window., Discussion: The efficacy of RTX outlasted substantial reconstitution of circulating B cells in PwMS, which suggests that renewal of the immune system underlies the prolonged effect of RTX in MS. These findings suggest that extended interval dosing of RTX that leads to a significant reconstitution of circulating B cells is safe in PwMS, could reduce the risk of infection, and could improve vaccine efficacy., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Context: Parkinson disease is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. Symptomatic treatment is based on dopaminergic medications. In case of self-medication practices, there may be drug-drug interactions between over-the-counter medication and dopaminergic medications. Thus, the aim of our work was to develop a practical guide summarizing drug-drug interactions and assess it by patients and community pharmacy professionals., Methods: We performed a systematic analysis of drug-drug interactions between OTC medications available in France and antiparkinsonians (ATC Class N04) using Theriaque® and Drugs® databases, and summarized the results in a practical guide. We assessed patients' satisfaction by a questionnaire administered to hospitalized patients in a French expert center for Parkinson's disease. We estimated the impact of the guide on community pharmacy professionals through a survey online, by satisfaction, knowledge acquisition and estimated awareness in professional context., Results: We identified 16 OTC medication, related to seven symptoms, interacting with antiparkinsonians. We obtained 67 responses from patients, expressing high satisfaction. We obtained 101 responses from professionals, reporting high satisfaction, knowledge acquisition and increased awareness in professional context., Conclusion: Our results highlight the relevance of the guide and suggest that we may increase its dissemination to patients and community pharmacies., (Copyright © 2022 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Levodopa (L-dopa) remains the basis of pharmacological treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, L-dopa therapy is associated with the development of complications and presents major challenges in the long-term treatment. Thus, other medications may be suggested to delay and/or reduce the doses of L-dopa in order to prevent complications. The interpretation of treatment evolution reported in clinical trials on PD may be tricky, especially due to some variability in medications and dose regimens. Some authors have suggested a conversion factor to generate a total L-dopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), calculated as a sum of each parkinsonian medication. Therefore, LEDD provides an artificial summary of the total daily medication a patient is receiving, and to date, there is no report focusing on the clinical interpretation of this parameter. Thus, based on a 3-year, multi-center retrospective study assessing the impact of second-line therapy initiation on LEDD in PD patients, the aim of our article was to discuss LEDD as a quantitative outcome to estimate the impact of second-line therapies on medication regimens; and in the second part of the discussion, to provide a narrative review of the clinical outcomes associated with LEDD in the literature., (© 2021 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small vesicles released by the majority of cells in response to cell activation or death stimuli. They are grouped as small EVs or exosomes, large EVs such as microvesicles (MVs) and apoptotic bodies, resulting from distinct mechanisms of generation. EVs are released into the extracellular space, in most human biological fluids and tissues, including atherosclerotic plaques. They transport complex cargo of bioactive molecules, including proteins, lipids and genetic material and are therefore involved in pathophysiological pathways of cell-cell communication. Indeed, EVs are involved in several processes such as inflammation, coagulation, vascular dysfunction, angiogenesis and senescence, contributing to the initiation and progression of atherothrombotic diseases. Consequently, they behave as a determinant of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability leading to major cardiovascular disorders. Over the last decade, the field of EVs research has grown, highlighting their involvement in atherosclerosis. However, limitations in both detection methodologies and standardisation have hindered implementation of EVs in the clinical settings. This review summarizes the effect of EVs in atherosclerosis development, progression and severity, with specific attention devoted to their ambivalent roles in senescence and hemostasis. This review will also highlight the role of MVs as multifaceted messengers, able to promote or to attenuate atherosclerosis progression. Finally, we will discuss the main technical challenges and prerequisites of standardization for driving EVs to the clinics and delineate their relevance as emergent biomarkers and innovative therapeutic approaches in atherosclerosis., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The fundamental role of cell adhesion molecules in mediating various biological processes as angiogenesis has been well-documented. CD146, an adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily, and its soluble form, constitute major players in both physiological and pathological angiogenesis. A growing body of evidence shows soluble CD146 to be significantly elevated in the serum or interstitial fluid of patients with pathologies related to deregulated angiogenesis, as autoimmune diseases, obstetric and ocular pathologies, and cancers. To block the undesirable effects of this molecule, therapeutic antibodies have been developed. Herein, we review the multifaceted functions of CD146 in physiological and pathological angiogenesis and summarize the interest of using monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic purposes.

CD146 is a cell adhesion molecule expressed on endothelial cells, as well as on other cells such as mesenchymal stem cells and Th17 lymphocytes. This protein also exists in a soluble form, whereby it can be detected in biological fluids, including the serum or the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Some studies have highlighted the significance of CD146 and its soluble form in angiogenesis and inflammation, having been shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of many inflammatory autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis, mellitus diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and multiple sclerosis. In this review, we will focus on how CD146 and sCD146 contribute to the pathogenesis of the aforementioned autoimmune diseases and discuss the relevance of considering it as a biomarker in these pathologies.