Search

Tumor hypoxia is the most common feature of radioresistance to the radiotherapy (RT) of lung cancer and results in poor clinical outcomes. High-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is a novel RT technique to overcome this problem. However, a limited number of studies have been elucidated on the underlying mechanism(s) of RIBE and RISBE in cancer cells exposed to high-LET radiation under hypoxia. Here, we developed a new method to investigate the RIBE and RISBE under hypoxia using the SPICE-QST proton microbeams and a layered tissue co-culture system. Normal lung fibroblast (WI-38) and lung cancer (A549) cells were exposed in the range of 06 Gy of proton microbeams, wherein only ~0.04–0.15% of the cells were traversed by protons. Subsequently, primary bystander A549 cells were co-cultured with secondary bystander A549 cells in the presence or absence of a GJIC and NO inhibitor using co-culture systems. Studies show that there are differences in RIBE in A549 and WI-38 primary bystander cells under normoxia and hypoxia. Interestingly, treatment with a GJIC inhibitor showed an increase in the toxicity of primary bystander WI-38 cells but a decrease in A549 cells under hypoxia. Our results also show the induction of RISBE in secondary bystander A549 cells under hypoxia, where GJIC and NO inhibitors reduced the stressful effects on secondary bystander A549 cells. Together, these preliminary results, for the first time, represented the involvement of intercellular communications through GJIC in propagation of RIBE and RISBE in hypoxic cancer cells.

Abstract Background Radioresistance can pose a significant obstacle to the effective treatment of breast cancers. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical step in the acquisition of stem cell traits and radioresistance. Here, we investigated whether Maprang seed extract (MPSE), a gallotannin-rich extract of seed from Bouea macrophylla Griffith, could inhibit the radiation-induced EMT process and enhance the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells. Methods Breast cancer cells were pre-treated with MPSE before irradiation (IR), the radiosensitizing activity of MPSE was assessed using the colony formation assay. Radiation-induced EMT and stemness phenotype were identified using breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) marker (CD24−/low/CD44+) and mammosphere formation assay. Cell motility was determined via the wound healing assay and transwell migration. Radiation-induced cell death was assessed via the apoptosis assay and SA-β-galactosidase staining for cellular senescence. CSCs- and EMT-related genes were confirmed by real-time PCR (qPCR) and Western blotting. Results Pre-treated with MPSE before irradiation could reduce the clonogenic activity and enhance radiosensitivity of breast cancer cell lines with sensitization enhancement ratios (SERs) of 2.33 and 1.35 for MCF7 and MDA-MB231cells, respectively. Pretreatment of breast cancer cells followed by IR resulted in an increased level of DNA damage maker (γ-H2A histone family member) and enhanced radiation-induced cell death. Irradiation induced EMT process, which displayed a significant EMT phenotype with a down-regulated epithelial marker E-cadherin and up-regulated mesenchymal marker vimentin in comparison with untreated breast cancer cells. Notably, we observed that pretreatment with MPSE attenuated the radiation-induced EMT process and decrease some stemness-like properties characterized by mammosphere formation and the CSC marker. Furthermore, pretreatment with MPSE attenuated the radiation-induced activation of the pro-survival pathway by decrease the expression of phosphorylation of ERK and AKT and sensitized breast cancer cells to radiation. Conclusion MPSE enhanced the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells by enhancing IR-induced DNA damage and cell death, and attenuating the IR-induced EMT process and stemness phenotype via targeting survival pathways PI3K/AKT and MAPK in irradiated breast cancer cells. Our findings describe a novel strategy for increasing the efficacy of radiotherapy for breast cancer patients using a safer and low-cost natural product, MPSE.

Background: The most detrimental effect of DNA damage from radiation is DNA double-strand breaks, making it critical to identify reliable biomarkers for treatment response in cancer therapy. Gamma-H2AX (γ-H2AX), a marker of DNA double-strand breaks, was evaluated in this study as a potential biomarker for treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT)., Methods: Thirty patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received preoperative CCRT. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected at five time points: baseline, 24 hours after the first radiation fraction, mid-treatment, end of treatment, and six weeks post-CCRT. γ-H2AX levels were measured in these samples. MRI was used to assess treatment response based on magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG). Patients were classified as responders or non-responders based on mrTRG. T -test and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluated dynamic changes in γ-H2AX levels, and a multilevel linear regression model analyzed the relationship between γ-H2AX levels and treatment response., Results: Nineteen out of thirty patients (63.33%) were classified as responders. Significant dynamic changes in γ-H2AX levels were observed between non-responders and responders (P=0.01). The multilevel linear regression model showed a trend towards increased γ-H2AX levels in responders [1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.02 to 2.34, P=0.053]. Significant differences in γ-H2AX levels were observed from baseline to mid-treatment, end of treatment, and six weeks post-CCRT. Pathologic complete response (pCR) after CCRT was associated with significantly higher γ-H2AX ratios compared to those without pCR (P=0.04). However, no significant difference was identified in the multilevel linear regression model., Conclusions: γ-H2AX may have potential as a biomarker for treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative CCRT, although further validation is required., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-24-488/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)