Search

Objective: In the detection of seizure onset zones, arterial spin labeling (ASL) can overcome the limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG), which is invasive, expensive, and radioactive. PET/magnetic resonance (MR) systems have been introduced that allow simultaneous performance of ASL and PET, but comparisons of these techniques with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and comparisons among the treatment outcomes of these techniques are still lacking. Here, we investigate the effectiveness of ASL compared with that of SEEG and their outcomes in localizing mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) and assess the correlation between simultaneously acquired PET and ASL., Methods: Between October 2016 and August 2017, we retrospectively studied 12 patients diagnosed with pure unilateral MTLE. We extracted and quantitatively computed values for ASL and PET in the bilateral hippocampus. SEEG findings and outcome were considered the gold standard of lateralization. Finally, the bilateral asymmetry index (AI) was calculated to assess the correlation between PET and ASL., Results: Our results showed that hypoperfusion in the hippocampus detected using ASL matched the SEEG-defined epileptogenic zone in this series of patients. The mean normalized voxel value of ASL in the contralateral hippocampus was 0.97 ± 0.19, while in the ipsilateral hippocampus, it was 0.84 ± 0.14. Meanwhile, significantly decreased perfusion and metabolism were observed in these patients (Wilcoxon, p  < 0.05), with a significant positive correlation between the AI values derived from PET and ASL (Pearson's correlation, r  = 0.74, p  < 0.05)., Significance: In our SEEG- and outcome-defined patients with MTLE, ASL could provide significant information during presurgical evaluation, with the hypoperfusion detected with ASL reliably lateralizing MTLE. This non-invasive technique may be used as an alternative diagnostic tool for MTLE lateralization.

Aim: To evaluate the oncological outcomes of transanal local excision and the need for immediate conventional reoperation in the treatment of patients with high risk T(1) rectal cancers., Methods: Twenty five high risk T(1) rectal cancers treated by transanal local excision at the Guangdong General Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Twelve patients received transanal local excision and 13 patients underwent subsequent immediate surgical rescue after transanal local excision within 4 wk. Differences in the local recurrence rates and 5-year overall survival rates between the two groups were analyzed. The prognostic value of immediate conventional reoperation for high risk T(1) rectal cancers was also evaluated., Results: The median follow-up period was 62 mo. The local recurrence rates after transanal local excision for high risk T(1) rectal cancer were 50%. By immediate conventional reoperation, the local recurrence rates were significantly reduced to 7.7%. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.030). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a trend for decreased 5-year overall survival rates for patients treated by transanal local excision compared with immediate conventional reoperation (63% vs 89%)., Conclusion: Transanal local excision cannot be considered sufficient treatment for patients with high risk T(1) rectal cancers. Immediate conventional reoperation should be performed if the pathology of the local excision is high risk.

Objective: To evaluate the risk factors of lateral lymph node metastasis in advanced lower rectal cancer and its correlation with local recurrence and prognosis., Methods: Data from 96 consecutive patients with advanced lower rectal cancer underwent curative surgery with lateral dissection were retrospectively analyzed. The correlations of lateral lymph node metastasis with clinicopathologic characteristics, local recurrence and prognosis were investigated., Results: Lateral lymph node metastasis was observed in 14.6 (14/96) of the cases. In 40 patients with tumor diameter > or = 5 cm, 10 (25.0%) patients were found with lateral lymph node metastasis; while in the other 56 patients, only 4 (7.1%) cases were found with lateral lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Lateral lymph node metastasis was more frequent in patients whose tumor infiltrated full range of the intestinal wall (70%) than patients with 3/4, 2/4 and 1/4 intestinal wall was infiltrated (12.0%, 6.7% and 6.3%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Lateral lymph node metastasis rate of poorly differentiated carcinomas was significantly higher than those of moderate and well-differentiated ones (30% vs. 9.1% and 4.5%, P < 0.05). Local recurrence occurred in 18.8% (18 of 96 cases) of patients. Local recurrence in patients with positive lateral lymph node metastasis was 64.3%, while 11.0% in those without lateral lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant improvements in median survival for patients with negative lateral lymph node metastasis over patients with lateral lymph node metastasis (80.9 +/- 2.1 vs. 38 +/- 6.7 months, log-rank P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Tumor diameter, degree of tumor infiltration and histological differentiation are significant risk factors of lateral lymph node metastasis in advanced lower rectal cancer. Lateral lymph node metastasis is an important predictor of local recurrence and prognosis of patients.

Aim: To clarify the relationship between circumferential resection margin status and local and distant recurrence as well as survival of patients with middle and lower rectal carcinoma. The relationship between circumferential resection margin status and clinicopathologic characteristics of middle and lower rectal carcinoma was also evaluated., Methods: Cancer specimens from 56 patients with middle and lower rectal carcinoma who received total mesorectal excision at the Department of General Surgery of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital were studied. A large slice technique was used to detect mesorectal metastasis and evaluate circumferential resection margin status., Results: Local recurrence occurred in 12.5% (7 of 56 cases) of patients with middle and lower rectal carcinoma. Distant recurrence occurred in 25% (14 of 56 cases) of patients with middle and lower rectal carcinoma. Twelve patients (21.4%) had positive circumferential resection margin. Local recurrence rate of patients with positive circumferential resection margin was 33.3% (4/12), whereas it was 6.8% (3/44) in those with negative circumferential resection margin (P = 0.014). Distant recurrence was observed in 50% (6/12) of patients with positive circumferential resection margin; conversely, it was 18.2% (8/44) in those with negative circumferential resection margin (P = 0.024). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant improvements in median survival (32.2 +/- 4.1 mo, 95% CI: 24.1-40.4 mo vs 23.0 +/- 3.5 mo, 95% CI: 16.2-29.8 mo) for circumferential resection margin-negative patients over circumferential resection margin-positive patients (log-rank, P < 0.05). 37% T(3) tumors examined were positive for circumferential resection margin, while only 0% T(1) tumors and 8.7% T(2) tumors were examined as circumferential resection margin. The difference between these three groups was statistically significant (P = 0.021). In 18 cancer specimens with tumor diameter >= 5 cm 7 (38.9%) were detected as positive circumferential resection margin, while in 38 cancer specimens with a tumor diameter of < 5 cm only 5 (13.2%) were positive for circumferential resection margin (P = 0.028)., Conclusion: Our findings indicate that circumferential resection margin involvement is significantly associated with depth of tumor invasion and tumor diameter. The circumferential resection margin status is an important predictor of local and distant recurrence as well as survival of patients with middle and lower rectal carcinoma.

Objective: To detect mesorectal metastasis of middle and lower rectal cancer and to evaluate its relationship with clinicopathologic characteristics., Methods: Cancer specimens resected from 56 patients with middle and lower rectal cancer who received total mesorectal excision were examined by routine pathologic observation. The relationship between mesorectal metastasis and clinicopathologic characteristics of middle and lower rectal cancer was also investigated., Results: Mesorectal metastasis was detected in 36 (64.3%) of 56 cancer specimens. In 18 cancer specimens with tumor diameter > or = 5 cm, 15 (83.3%) were detected mesorectal metastasis, while in 38 cancer specimens with tumor diameter < 5 cm only 21 (55.3%) were detected mesorectal metastasis (P = 0.041). Mesorectal metastasis was more frequent in T(3) cancer specimens (81.5%) and T(2) cancer specimens (56.6%), compared with T(1) cancer specimens (1/6) (P = 0.007). 85.7% poorly differentiated cancer specimens were detected mesorectal metastasis, while moderate and well-differentiated cancer specimens were only 63.2% and 1/5 respectively (P = 0.028). Mesorectal metastasis was more frequent in stage III cancer specimens (100%), compared with stage II and I cancer specimens (27.3% and 1/5 respectively, P = 0.000). No significant correlations were found between mesorectal metastasis and other variables such as age, gender and Ming classification (P > 0.05)., Conclusion: Mesorectal metastasis of middle and lower rectal cancer has significant correlation with tumor diameter, tumor invasion, tumor differentiation and TNM stage. Total mesorectal excision or > or = 5 cm mesorectal distal to the rectal tumor should be followed in the management of middle and lower rectal cancer.

Objective: To examine the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and to evaluate its correlation with mesorectal metastasis in middle and lower rectal cancer., Methods: The resected primary tumors from 56 patients with middle and lower rectal cancer who received total mesorectal excision were studied from Dec. 2001 to Jul. 2003., Results: The MMP-2 expression was positive in 42 (75%) cases. The positive rate of MMP-2 expression was 88.9% in T3 tumors and 69.6 % in T2 tumors respectively, while only 33.3% in T1 tumors (P=0.013). MMP-2 was positive in 91.2% (31/34) infiltrative rectal carcinomas while 40.0% (6/15) expansive rectal carcinomas (P=0.001). Mesorectal metastasis was detected in 36 (64.3%) of 56 cases. The expression of MMP-2 was positive in 31 (86.1%) of the 36 patients with mesorectal metastasis, while in 11(55%) of the 20 patients without mesorectal metastasis (P=0.01)., Conclusions: The expression of MMP-2 in middle and lower rectal cancer is significantly associated with depth of tumor invasion and Ming classifications. The high expression of MMP-2 may play an important role in the development of mesorectal metastasis in middle and lower rectal cancer.