Search

The concept of the "last mile," crucial in logistics for its complexity and cost, has a parallel in public health services. The last mile in public health is fraught with issues such as fragmented services, regulatory barriers, and resistance to evidence-based interventions. This commentary draws parallels between the challenges in delivering goods to consumers' doorsteps and the difficulties in delivering interventions to reduce overdoses in the community. The HEALing Communities Study (HCS), a large implementation science research study, provides an example of how to navigate some of these last-mile challenges. HCS used a community-driven process that considered local characteristics and preferences, and engaged people with lived experience to create effective and sustainable solutions. However, the study also encountered significant challenges in building a delivery infrastructure, working with delayed and incomplete data, and overcoming stigma around substance use interventions. Lessons from the logistics sector can help improve the efficiency and equity of overdose prevention efforts, ensuring that people receive the life-saving interventions they need., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In response to the ongoing overdose crisis in Canada, a number of opioid agonist treatment and safer supply programs provide people at high overdose risk with daily-dispensed tablet hydromorphone, with some requiring witnessed ingestion and others providing take-away doses. While these programs are intended to reduce overdose events by limiting people's use of the contaminated drug supply, the experiences of people receiving hydromorphone vary. In this article we explore the ways people repurpose hydromorphone to address unmet needs., Methods: This article draws on in-depth qualitative interviews from two studies evaluating hydromorphone tablet distribution programs in British Columbia, Canada. We used thematic analysis to identify themes related to repurposing hydromorphone. We compared themes across the two studies to identify any similarities or differences in relation to the ways study participants discussed repurposing hydromorphone tablets. We utilize vignettes - snapshots of participant experiences - to analyse and represent the data., Results: Four vignettes demonstrate how hydromorphone tablets are often being used to address and resolve unmet needs of people who use drugs. While most participants reported reducing their use of illicit drugs, a variety of instrumental uses of tablet hydromorphone were also discussed, including reducing anxiety, addressing sleep issues, withdrawal management, and managing chronic pain., Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate how people who use drugs are maximizing the benefits of tablet hydromorphone distribution to address unmet needs. Hydromorphone distribution programs represent a public health and harm reduction intervention that is usefully addressing experiences related to structural vulnerabilities (such as inadequate pain management), which are often overlooked amongst stigmatized groups., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

High dose and long-acting opioid overdose reversal drugs can precipitate withdrawal in people who are opioid dependent. Products recently brought to market for community use in the United States (US) have drawn international concern because of their increased risk of withdrawal. At the March 18-19, 2024, Compassionate Overdose Response Summit & Naloxone Dosing Meeting, a panel of harm reduction experts issued the following call to action: 1) people who use drugs should be directly involved in decisions regarding the research, development, selection, and distribution of opioid overdose reversal products; 2) regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical manufacturers should carefully consider and communicate the risk and duration of withdrawal associated with higher dose and longer-acting opioid antagonists; 3) take-home naloxone kits should include at least two doses of an intramuscular (IM) product containing 0.4 mg or an intranasal (IN) product containing ≤4 mg; 4) At this time, high dose and long-acting opioid antagonists have no use in acute opioid overdose response; and, 5) overdose response educational materials, instructions on overdose response, and training should emphasize the restoration of breathing, avoiding withdrawal, and compassionate post-overdose support and care. High dose and long-acting opioid overdose reversal drugs were approved without testing for withdrawal and are often aggressively marketed despite decades of evidence from naloxone distribution programs worldwide that the ideal dose of naloxone is one that restores breathing without inducing withdrawal. Government agencies should direct resources to harm reduction programs to make standard dose take-home naloxone products widely available among people who use drugs. Lay bystanders, people who use drugs, their families, and professional first responders can learn and apply a compassionate approach to opioid overdose response., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: 1. Erin Russell discloses that Harm Reduction Therapeutics is a client of Health Management Associates. HRT is a nonprofit organization based in the United States that manufactures a 3 mg naloxone nasal spray product. 2. In the last three years, Joanne Neale has secured, through her university, research funding from Mundipharma Research Ltd (for research on naloxone) and Camurus AB (for research on long-acting injectable buprenorphine). She has also received honoraria from Indivior and Camurus AB for presentations and from Figure 8 Consultancy Ltd for research advice on a study of residential rehabilitation., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the United States, community overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs have demonstrated efficacy in reducing opioid-related mortality. OEND programs have expanded across San Diego County, California, but differential naloxone accessibility among people who use drugs (PWUD) has not been assessed. We examined factors that shape individual naloxone accessibility in San Diego., Methods: We employed a convergent parallel mixed methods design using surveys (n = 194) and qualitative interviews (n = 20). Ordinal logistic regression examined factors associated with individual naloxone accessibility (i.e., the frequency with which participants could access naloxone within five minutes, categorized as never, sometimes, or always). Qualitative interviews explored participant perceptions of naloxone accessibility and whether and how they maintained naloxone. We organized multilevel findings into a modified social-ecological model., Results: In quantitative and qualitative samples, participants were majority male (72 % and 70 % respectively), non-White race/ethnicity (55 % and 75 %), with an average age around 42 years. In the quantitative sample, 24 % never had personally accessible naloxone, 52 % sometimes did, and 24 % always did. Factors independently associated with individual naloxone accessibility were female gender (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AdjOR]: 2.51, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.31-4.85), monthly income <$500 (AdjOR: 0.42, 95 %CI:0.19, 0.90), witnessing an overdose (AdjOR: 3.51, 95 %CI:1.67-7.55), and knowing where to get free naloxone (AdjOR: 3.44, 95 %CI: 1.79-6.75). Qualitative data suggested that naloxone was generally easy to acquire in San Diego due to community harm reduction outreach and mutual aid among peers, albeit community barriers including distance to harm reduction providers and frequent relocation/displacement for those experiencing homelessness. Individual attitudes toward overdose risk, naloxone, and community responsibility contributed to varied individual naloxone accessibility., Conclusions: This study highlights multilevel factors influencing individual naloxone accessibility among people who use drugs in San Diego, emphasizing the importance of harm reduction outreach and peer-to-peer support. We identified opportunities for interventions that address both individual attitudes and community-level barriers to improve naloxone accessibility., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Overdose fatality review teams (OFRTs) are becoming more common across U.S. communities as a means of addressing the overdose epidemic and improving local overdose prevention strategies; however, empirical examinations of the work of OFRTs are lacking. The current study seeks to characterize recommendations for local overdose prevention strategies made by county-level OFRTs across Indiana in order to understand their practices., Methods: A qualitative descriptive content analysis was conducted on recommendations made by 19 county-level OFRTs across Indiana in 2022., Results: OFRTs generated 1512 recommendations during 2022 based on case reviews of 291 overdose deaths occurring across 19 Indiana counties; of those, 26.8 % (n=405) were specific to the case reviewed, rather than relevant to the broader community, and were not further coded. The remaining 1109 recommendations were coded according to their overall scope, recommendation strategy, and target agency. The most common recommendations addressed substance use more broadly (e.g., improving substance use screening/assessment in healthcare settings), followed by recommendations directly addressing overdose risk (e.g., naloxone distribution, increasing harm reduction programs). Other common recommendations related to mental health, OFRT practices, and addressing social determinants of health. Common recommendation strategies were to implement new services or service improvements., Conclusion: Results highlight the extent of further efforts needed to improve overdose prevention and the need for further research and support of OFRTs across the United States., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors have no conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Deaths due to unintentional opioid overdose among youth living in the United States have risen at an extraordinary rate over the past 4 years. 1 After remaining stable over the preceding decade, the rate of drug overdose deaths increased more than 2.3-fold from 2019 to 2021 to a record high of 5.49 deaths per 100,000 youth. 1 This rise in fatal overdoses is largely due to increased prevalence of illicitly manufactured fentanyl in the drug supply. In 2021, fentanyl was identified in 77.1% of overdose deaths among US adolescents, a 23.5-fold increase from 2010, compared to 13.3% for benzodiazepines, 5.8% for prescription opioids, and 2.3% for heroin. 1 Compared to other phases of the opioid crisis, fentanyl-related overdoses are characterized by extraordinarily broad geographic and sociodemographic reach., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

This pilot study explores the utilization of the Overdose Detection Mapping Application Program (ODMAP) as a tool for enhancing collaboration between the public health and public safety sectors to address the overdose epidemic in the United States. Through qualitative interviews with ODMAP users, key themes emerged, including the role of data sharing in facilitating collaboration, challenges posed by divergent data privacy standards, and the need for clearer guidance on cross-sector data sharing. Findings highlight ODMAP's potential to integrate data for targeted interventions at individual and population levels. Future research directions include overcoming data sharing barriers, strategically utilizing data across sectors, and rigorously evaluating the impact of cross-sector partnerships on overdose morbidity and mortality. Overall, this study underscores the importance of ODMAP in fostering coordinated responses to the overdose crisis and provides valuable insights for improving overdose surveillance and intervention efforts., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: For people with opioid use disorder (OUD), transitioning from pregnancy to postpartum and from incarceration to the community is a time of increased risk for opioid overdose. This prospective project evaluated the extent of Jenna's Project's success in preventing overdoses and improving recovery outcomes by coordinating postrelease care in incarcerated OUD perinatal patients., Methods: Participants (N = 132) were pregnant or postpartum (1 year postdelivery) with OUD during incarceration and self-referred for postrelease services. From March 2020 to October 2021, participants could receive up to 6 months of postincarceration care coordination services (eg, regular communication, transportation, emergency housing, SUD treatment), medication to treat OUD (MOUD) and other treatment services. Outcomes included verified overdose (fatal), self-reported nonfatal overdose, reincarceration, active Medicaid, receipt of MOUD, presence of children living with participants, open Child Protective Services cases, and number of referrals for services., Results: There were 0 nonfatal and 0 fatal overdoses at both 1 and 6 months postrelease, and 3 of 132 (2%) returned to incarceration. Significantly fewer participants had Medicaid at release (36%) and at 6 months postrelease (60%) than before incarceration (87%) ( P < 0.001 for all 3 pairwise comparisons). At 6 months postrelease, significantly more participants reported MOUD receipt (51%) compared with before incarceration (39%) ( P < 0.001). There was no significant change in the number of open Child Protective Services cases. Referrals for childcare or parenting services were the most common referrals provided., Conclusion: Immediate postrelease care coordination for pregnant and postpartum women with OUD was feasible and effective in preventing overdose, reincarceration, and promoting recovery outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Addiction Medicine.)

Objectives: On January 31, 2023, a three-year exemption from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act was granted to the Canadian province British Columbia (BC), allowing the cumulative possession of 2.5 g of specific unregulated drugs amongst adults. The goals of the policy are to reduce health, social, and economic harms associated with criminalization, stigma, drug overdose deaths, as well as drug seizures, arrests, and associated enforcement and court costs. As the inaugural year has passed, we aimed to assess people who use drugs' awareness and knowledge of the, as well as the policy's impact on their drug use patterns and overdose risk., Methods: We conducted 100 telephone-based semi-structured interviews with people who use drugs from across BC, exploring changes in drug use experiences and perceived overdose risk since the implementation of the policy. Participants also completed an interviewer-administered survey assessing socio-demographics and substance use patterns. We utilized a qualitative content analysis approach to analyze the interview data., Results: Our findings indicate a general awareness of the policy among participants, although some policy details were often misunderstood, and participants expressed the need for more widespread dissemination of policy information. While the majority of participants reported that their drug use patterns remained unchanged after decriminalization, some made subtle adjustments, such as carrying under the 2.5 g threshold to minimize the risk of criminalization. Participants highlighted several policy benefits and concerns, including its potential to reduce criminalization and stigmatization, but also increase public drug consumption. Participants offered suggestions for policy improvement., Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for ongoing monitoring of the impacts of decriminalization regarding its potential impact on people who use drugs' drug use patterns and related risks. Reevaluation of the possession threshold and efforts to enhance education and awareness about the policy could help achieve the policy's goals., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid, exposure to which has led to hundreds of thousands of overdose deaths. Novel vaccines are being developed that might protect against fentanyl overdose. Proactive attention to strategic communications and stakeholder engagement may smooth uptake of a novel vaccine given known challenges around vaccine hesitancy and concern for stigma related to substance use., Methods: Qualitative interviews (N = 74) with a purposive sample of adolescents/young adults with opioid use disorder (OUD), family members of persons with OUD, experts in substance use treatment and harm reduction, and community members were conducted and thematically analyzed to discern attitudes toward a fentanyl vaccine, and directions for communications and engagement., Results: Major themes reflected personal concerns for biomedical risk and system-level concerns for alignment and integration of an overdose preventing vaccine with prevailing beliefs about addiction and associated frameworks and philosophies for treatment and response., Conclusion: Acceptability and implementation of a novel fentanyl vaccine targeting overdose will need precision communications that address biomedical, moral/spiritual, and structural perspectives about the nature of addiction. Education about the purpose and limits of a fentanyl vaccine, partnerships with diverse stakeholders from throughout the opioid response ecosystem and interweaving of a vaccine strategy into comprehensive prevention and treatment are recommended., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Ofer Levy reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Elissa Weitzman reports a relationship with OVAX LLC that includes: advisory support. Ofer Levy reports a relationship with OVAX LLC that includes: equity or stocks. David Dowling reports a relationship with OVAX LLC that includes: equity or stocks. Sharon Levy reports a relationship with OVAX LLC that includes: advisory support. David Dowling reports a relationship with Merck Research Laboratories that includes: consulting or advisory. Ofer Levy, David Dowling, Sharon Levy has patent pending to Boston Children’s Hospital. Dr. Asimenia Angelidou and Dr. Ofer Levy are guest editors at Vaccine. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.]., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The development of drug policies has been a major focus for policy-makers across North America in light of the ongoing public health emergency caused by the overdose crisis. In this context, the current study examined stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of power and value in a drug policy-making process in a North American city using qualitative, questionnaire, and social network data., Methods: We interviewed 18 people who participated in the development of a drug policy proposal between October 2021 and March 2022. They represented different groups and organizations, including government (n = 3), people who use drugs-led advocacy organizations (n = 5), other drug policy advocacy organizations (n = 5), research (n = 3) and police (n = 2). Most of them identified as men (n = 8) and white (n = 16), and their ages ranged between 30 and 80 years old (median = 50). Social network analysis questionnaires and semi-structured qualitative interviews were administered via Zoom. Social network data were analysed using igraph in R, and qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. The analyses explored perceptions of value and power within a drug policy-making network., Results: The policy-making network showed that connections could be found across participants from different groups, with government officials being the most central. Qualitative data showed that inclusion in the network and centrality did not necessarily translate into feeling powerful or valued. Many participants were dissatisfied with the process despite having structurally advantageous positions or self-reporting moderately high quantitative value scores. Participants who viewed themselves as more valued acknowledged many process shortcomings, but they also saw it as more balanced or fair than those who felt undervalued., Conclusions: While participation can make stakeholders and communities feel valued and empowered, our findings highlight that inclusion, position and diversity of connections in a drug policy-making network do not, in and of itself, guarantee these outcomes. Instead, policy-makers must provide transparent terms of reference guidelines and include highly skilled facilitators in policy discussions. This is particularly important in policy processes that involve historical power imbalances in the context of a pressing public health emergency., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Individuals who have survived an overdose often have myriad needs that extend far beyond their drug use. The social determinants of health (SDOH) framework has been underutilized throughout the opioid overdose crisis, despite widespread acknowledgment that SDOH are contributors to the majority of health outcomes. Post Overdose Response Teams (PORTs) engage with individuals who have experienced 1 or more nonfatal overdoses and bear witness to the many ways in which overdose survivors experience instability with healthcare, housing, employment, and family structure. Employing a harm reduction model, PORTs are well-positioned to reach people who use drugs (PWUD) and to address gaps in basic needs on an individualized basis, including providing social support and a sense of personal connection during a period of heightened vulnerability. The New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) PORT program is a harm reduction initiative that utilizes law enforcement data and several public databases to obtain accurate referral information and has been active since 2019 in NYC. This PORT program offers various services from overdose prevention education and resources, referrals to health and treatment services, and support services to overdose survivors and individuals within their social network. This perspective paper provides an in-depth overview of the program and shares quantitative and qualitative findings from the pilot phase and Year 1 of the program collected via client referral data, interviews, and case note reviews. It also examines the barriers and successes the program encountered during the pilot phase and Year 1. The team's approach to addressing complex needs is centered around human connection and working toward addressing SDOH one individualized solution at a time. Application of the NYSDOH PORT model as outlined has the potential to create significant positive impacts on the lives of PWUD, while potentially becoming a new avenue to reduce SDOH-related issues among PWUD., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Importance: The HEALing Communities Study (HCS) evaluated the effectiveness of the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention in preventing fatal overdoses amidst the US opioid epidemic., Objective: To evaluate the impact of the CTH intervention on total drug overdose deaths and overdose deaths involving combinations of opioids with psychostimulants or benzodiazepines., Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was a parallel-arm, multisite, community-randomized, open, and waitlisted controlled comparison trial of communities in 4 US states between 2020 and 2023. Eligible communities were those reporting high opioid overdose fatality rates in Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. Covariate constrained randomization stratified by state allocated communities to the intervention or control group. Trial groups were balanced by urban or rural classification, 2016-2017 fatal opioid overdose rate, and community population. Data analysis was completed by December 2023., Intervention: Increased overdose education and naloxone distribution, treatment with medications for opioid use disorder, safer opioid prescribing practices, and communication campaigns to mitigate stigma and drive demand for evidence-based interventions., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of drug overdose deaths among adults (aged 18 years or older), with secondary outcomes of overdose deaths involving specific opioid-involved drug combinations from death certificates. Rates of overdose deaths per 100 000 adult community residents in intervention and control communities from July 2021 to June 2022 were compared with analyses performed in 2023., Results: In 67 participating communities (34 in the intervention group, 33 in the control group) and including 8 211 506 participants (4 251 903 female [51.8%]; 1 273 394 Black [15.5%], 603 983 Hispanic [7.4%], 5 979 602 White [72.8%], 354 527 other [4.3%]), the average rate of overdose deaths involving all substances was 57.6 per 100 000 population in the intervention group and 61.2 per 100 000 population in the control group. This was not a statistically significant difference (adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78-1.07; P = .26). There was a statistically significant 37% reduction (aRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.91; P = .02) in death rates involving an opioid and psychostimulants (other than cocaine), and nonsignificant reductions in overdose deaths for an opioid with cocaine (6%) and an opioid with benzodiazepine (1%)., Conclusion and Relevance: In this clinical trial of the CTH intervention, death rates involving an opioid and noncocaine psychostimulant were reduced; total deaths did not differ statistically. Community-focused data-driven interventions that scale up evidence-based practices with communications campaigns may effectively reduce some opioid-involved polysubstance overdose deaths., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939.

Importance: Layperson-administered naloxone (LAN) is a powerful but incompletely characterized intervention to prevent opioid-related overdose mortality. LAN trends are relevant to policy and strategic planning in naloxone distribution initiatives., Objective: To assess the 2-year LAN trend for persons in the United States receiving naloxone during emergency medical services (EMS) activations., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the United States from June 2020 to June 2022 among 65 621 195 EMS activations from 911 responses, EMS standbys, or when EMS crews functioned in an ambulance intercept role or during mutual aid to another ambulance response. Activations within health care settings and interfacility or medical transports were excluded. Data are from the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS), the national EMS patient care record database. From June 2020 to June 2022, NEMSIS included more than 96 million EMS activations from nearly 14 000 agencies across 54 states and territories., Exposures: EMS clinician-reported LAN., Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was the trend of receiving LAN, measured by EMS clinician documentation., Results: From June 2020 to June 2022, EMS reported 744 078 patients receiving naloxone, with 24 990 (3.4%) involving LAN. Patients were predominantly male (17 331 [69.4%]) and had a median (IQR) age of 42 (31-56) years, with the majority treated in urban homes or residences (21 692 [86.8%] urban; 13 223 [52.9%] in-home or residence). Of the total naloxone recipients, 243 985 patients (32.8%) had suspected drug overdose documentation as either the primary or secondary impression. Overall, the percentage change in naloxone administration rates decreased 6.1% over the study period (from 1140.1 [95% CI, 1135.1-1145.1] per 100 000 EMS activations to 1070.1 [95% CI, 1064.9-1075.3] per 100 000 EMS activations), while the percentage change of persons receiving LAN increased 43.5% (from 30.0 [95% CI, 29.2-30.8] per 100 000 EMS activations to 43.1 [95% CI, 42.0-44.1] per 100 000 EMS activations)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the LAN rate increased from June 2020 to June 2022 as reported in the national EMS database. These findings help inform policies and practices aimed at mitigating the devastating impacts of the opioid epidemic and saving lives. Novel public health strategies are needed to measure the effects of this intervention nationally, evaluate approaches to expand naloxone distribution, and address naloxone usage barriers.

Background: Amidst the ongoing drug poisoning crisis across North America, drug checking services (DCS) are increasingly being implemented as an intervention intended to reduce drug-related harms. This study sought to identify key opportunities and challenges influencing the implementation of DCS in British Columbia (BC), Canada., Methods: Between January 2020 and July 2021, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 21 individuals involved in the implementation of DCS across BC (i.e., policymakers, health authority personnel, community organization representatives and service providers). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis of the interviews., Results: By bringing in a wealth of knowledge about community needs and concerns, in addition to a passion and energy for social justice and health equity, community members and organizations with a dedication for harm reduction played a critical role in the successful implementation of DCS in BC. Other significant facilitators to implementation included the preventive benefits of DCS that made the intervention compelling to policy influencers and decision makers, the provincial public health emergency regarding overdose that shifted the regulatory environment of DCS, the adaptability of DCS to meet concerns and needs in various contexts, including via ongoing processes of reflection and evaluation. Barriers to implementation included criminalization and stigmatization of drug use and people who use drugs and lack of funding for community-led implementation actions., Conclusions: Alongside structural reforms that address the underlying contextual factors that influence implementation (e.g., decriminalization of drugs, increased funding for DCS), centering community expertise throughout implementation is critical to the success of DCS. Our findings provide important insights into how BC can successfully implement systems-level harm reduction interventions and offer insights for other jurisdictions in their implementation of DCS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), suicide and overdose are linked across the life course and across generations and share common individual-, interpersonal-, community- and societal-level risk factors. The purpose of this review is to summarise the shared aetiology of these public health issues, synthesise evidence regarding potential community- and societal-level prevention strategies and discuss future research and practice directions.Growing evidence shows the potential for community- and societal-level programmes and policies, including higher minimum wage; expanded Medicaid eligibility; increased earned income tax credits, child tax credits and temporary assistance for needy families benefits; Paid Family Leave; greater availability of affordable housing and rental assistance; and increased participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), to contribute to ACEs, suicide and overdose prevention. Considerations for future prevention efforts include (1) expanding the evidence base through rigorous research and evaluation; (2) assessing the implications of prevention strategies for equity; (3) incorporating a relational health perspective; (4) enhancing community capacity to implement, scale and sustain evidenced-informed prevention strategies; and (5) acknowledging that community- and societal-level prevention strategies are longer-term strategies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Substance use disorder (SUD), overdose, and drug use-related crime continue to increase in the U.S. Pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment programs may decrease crime recidivism and overdose deaths. We assessed the impact of a community-wide diversion-to-treatment initiative on crime, incarceration, and overdose., Methods: This article reports on the prospective evaluation of a law enforcement-led, pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment program on crime, incarceration, and overdose deaths compared between participants who did not engage (non-engaged; n = 103), engaged but did not complete (non-completers; n = 60) and completed (completers; n = 100) the program. Participants included 263 adults apprehended by police officers for low-level, drug use-related crimes between September 1, 2017 and August 31, 2020. The program offered eligible persons participation in a six-month program consisting of a clinical assessment, referral to addiction treatment services based on each individual's needs, connection to recovery peer support, and treatment engagement monitoring. Completers had their initial criminal charges 'voided,' while non-engaged and non-Completer participants had their original charges filed with local prosecutors. The project collected participant-level data on arrests and incarceration within 12 months before and 12 months after program enrollment and data on fatal overdose within 12 months after program enrollment. Logistic regression predicted outcomes using baseline demographics (sex, age, race, housing status) and pre-index crime arrest and incarceration indices as covariates., Results: After accounting for baseline demographics and pre-enrollment arrest/incarceration history, logistic regression models found that the non-engaged and the non-Completer groups were more likely than completers to be arrested (odds ratios [ORs]: 3.9 [95 % CI, 2.0-7.7] and 3.6 [95 % CI, 1.7-7.5], respectively) and incarcerated (ORs: 10.3 [95 % CI, 5.0-20.8] and 21.0 [95 % CI, 7.9-55.7], respectively) during the 12-month follow-up. Rates of overdose deaths during the 12-month follow-up were greatest in non-engaged (6/103, 5.8 %) and non-Completer (2/60, 3.3 %) groups; completers had the lowest rate (2/100, 2.0 %), with all deaths occurring after completion of the six-month treatment/monitoring program., Conclusions: Collaboration between law enforcement, clinicians, researchers, and the broader community to divert adults who commit a low-level, drug use-related crime from criminal prosecution to addiction treatment may effectively reduce crime recidivism, incarceration, and overdose deaths., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest AEZ's research is supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; AEZ is a member of the American Society of Addiction Medicine Board of Directors. JEN's research is supported by the Department of Defense, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program and the National Institutes of Health. Retired Captain JAB serves as a consultant for the development and implementation of pre-arrest diversion programs. The other authors report no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Federal, state, and municipal governments in the United States have been reluctant to authorize overdose prevention centers (OPCs), which are evidence-based approaches for preventing overdose deaths and blood-borne pathogen transmission., Methods: From July 2022 to February 2023, we explored how stigma manifests in OPC policymaking by conducting in-depth interviews with 17 advocates, legislators, service providers, and researchers involved with OPC advocacy and policymaking in Rhode Island, California, Pennsylvania, and New York., Results: We found that although jurisdictions differed in their OPC policymaking experiences, stigma manifested throughout the process, from planning to authorization. Participants described OPCs as a tool for destigmatizing overdose and substance use, yet confronted institutionalized stigma and discriminatory attitudes toward people who use drugs (PWUD) and harm reduction from multiple sources (eg, politicians, media, and members of the public). Opposition toward OPCs and harm reduction approaches more broadly intersected with public discourse on crime, homelessness, and public disorder. Employed stigma-mitigation strategies included humanizing PWUD, publicizing the benefits of OPCs to the wider community, and strategically engaging media., Conclusion: These findings illustrate the importance of understanding stigma at different stages of the policymaking process to better facilitate authorization and eventual implementation of OPCs in the United States., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JNP served as a technical consultant on a US Food and Drug Administration grant (U01FD00745501). The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Background: Adolescents and young adults with risk factors for opioid misuse and opioid use disorder are at elevated risk for overdose. We examined prior non-fatal overdose experiences among at-risk adolescents/young adults to inform prevention efforts., Methods: Adolescents/young adults (ages 16-30) in two US emergency departments self-reporting past year opioid misuse or opioid use plus a misuse risk factor completed a baseline survey as part of an ongoing randomised controlled trial. We describe baseline factors associated with (a) overall non-fatal overdose experiences and (b) groups based on substance(s) used during the worst overdose experience., Results: Among 771 participants (27.9% male), 40.7% reported a non-fatal overdose experience. Compared with those without a prior overdose experience, those with prior overdose experience(s) were less likely to be heterosexual, and more likely to report a prior suicide attempt and greater peer substance misuse. Regarding the worst overdose experience, substance(s) included: 36.6% alcohol only, 28.0% alcohol and cannabis, 22.6% alcohol with other substance(s) and 12.7% other substance(s) only (eg, opioids). Compared with the alcohol only group, the alcohol and cannabis group were younger and less likely to be heterosexual; the alcohol with other substance(s) group were older and had greater peer substance misuse; and the other substance(s) only group were more likely to be male, receive public assistance, screen positive for anxiety and less likely to be heterosexual., Conclusions: Among at-risk adolescents/young adults, findings support the need for tailored overdose prevention efforts based on substance(s) used, with consideration of sexuality, mental health and peer substance use., Trial Registration Number: NCT04550715., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Scholarship on how fentanyl affects the complexities of correctional settings is limited in Canada, as scholars have focused on the prevalence of opioid use and overdose in prisons, as well as community treatment and access following release. Fentanyl constitutes a continuing challenge both in prisons and broader society., Results: The current qualitative, interview-based empirical study examines how fentanyl is interpreted by correctional officers (COs, n = 99) across federal prisons in Canada, some of whom have worked in institutions with a high presence of fentanyl, while others have less exposure to the drug. We found that while many COs had responded to an overdose during their first or second year on the job, most COs who had did not perceive the event to be psychologically traumatic nor were concerned about the presence and availability fentanyl in their work environment, or they were indifferent. Yet this finding competes with the 41.4% of officers who did express concern about the presence of fentanyl - suggesting both a "normalization" of fentanyl as a workplace hazard as well as an underpinning social concern., Conclusions: We discuss the implications of these complicated findings in relation to reducing workplace stressors and countering misinformation that, in addition to other potential occupational factors, may be responsible for the concerns of COs tied to the presence of fentanyl., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Globally, drug-related deaths (DRDs) are increasing, posing a significant challenge. Scotland has the highest DRD rate in Europe and one of the highest globally. The Scottish Government launched the Digital Lifelines Scotland (DLS) program to increase the provision of digital technology in harm reduction services and other support services. Digital technology responses to DRDs can include education through digital platforms, improved access to treatment and support via telehealth and mobile apps, analysis of data to identify risk factors, and the use of digital tools for naloxone distribution. However, digital technology should be integrated into a comprehensive approach that increases access to services and addresses underlying causes. Digital transformation could enhance harm reduction service and support, but challenges must be addressed for successful implementation. The DLS program aims to enhance digital inclusion and improve health outcomes for people who use or are affected by drug use to reduce the risk of DRDs., Objective: This study aims to explore the role of digital technology as an enabler and supporter in enhancing existing services and innovating new solutions, rather than being a stand-alone solution. Specifically focusing on individuals who use drugs, the research investigates the potential of digital inclusion and technology provision for preventing DRDs within the context of the DLS program., Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 47 people: 21 (45%) service users, 14 (30%) service providers, and 12 (26%) program staff who were all involved in DLS. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and then coded. Analysis was done in three phases: (1) thematic analysis of interview data to identify the benefits of digital technologies in this sector; (2) identification of the challenges and enablers of using digital technologies using the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvironment conceptual framework; and (3) mapping digital technology provision to services offered to understand the extent of digital transformation of the field., Results: Participants identified increased connectivity, enhanced access to services, and improved well-being as key benefits. Digital devices facilitated social connections, alleviated loneliness, and fostered a sense of community. Devices enabled engagement with services and support workers, providing better access to resources. In addition, digital technology was perceived as a preventive measure to reduce harmful drug use. Lack of technical knowledge, organizational constraints, and usability challenges, including device preferences and security issues, were identified., Conclusions: The study found that digital inclusion through the provision of devices and connections has the potential to enhance support in the harm reduction sector. However, it highlighted the limitations of existing digital inclusion programs in achieving comprehensive digital transformation. To progress, there is a need for sustained engagement, cultural change, and economic considerations to overcome barriers., (©Hadi Daneshvar, Hannah Carver, Graeme Strachan, Jessica Greenhalgh, Catriona Matheson. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.09.2024.)

Background: The increase in opioid-related overdoses has caused a decrease in average life expectancy, highlighting the need for effective interventions to reduce overdose risk and prevent subsequent overdoses. Peer support specialists (PSSs) offer an appealing strategy to engage overdose survivors and reduce overdose risk, but randomized controlled trials are needed to formalize peer-led interventions and evaluate their effectiveness., Objective: This National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study is a multisite, prospective, pilot randomized (1:1) controlled trial (CTN protocol 0107) that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an emergency department (ED)-initiated, peer-delivered intervention tailored for opioid overdose survivors (Peer Intervention to Link Overdose survivors to Treatment [PILOT]), compared with treatment as usual (TAU)., Methods: This study evaluates the effectiveness of the 6-month, PSS-led PILOT intervention compared with TAU on the primary outcome of reducing overdose risk behavior 6 months after enrollment. Adults (aged ≥18 years; N=150) with a recent opioid-related overdose were identified and approached in the ED. Participants were screened and enrolled, either in the ED or within 7 days of ED discharge at research offices or in the community and then asked to complete study visits at months 1, 3, 6 (end of intervention), and 7 (follow-up). Participants were enrolled at 3 study sites in the United States: Greenville, South Carolina; Youngstown, Ohio; and Everett, Washington. Participants randomized to the PILOT intervention received a 6-month, PSS-led intervention tailored to each participant's goals to reduce their overdose risk behavior (eg, overdose harm reduction, housing, medical, and substance use treatment or recovery goals). Participants randomized to TAU received standard-of-care overdose materials, education, and services provided through the participating EDs. This paper describes the study protocol and procedures, explains the design and inclusion and exclusion decisions, and provides details of the peer-led PILOT intervention and supervision of PILOT PSSs., Results: Study enrollment opened in December 2021 and was closed in July 2023. A total of 150 participants across 3 sites were enrolled in the study, meeting the proposed sample size for the trial. Primary and secondary analyses are underway and expected to be published in early 2025., Conclusions: There is an urgent need to better understand the characteristics of overdose survivors presenting to the ED and for rigorous trials evaluating the effectiveness of PSS-led interventions on engaging overdose survivors and reducing overdose risk. Results from this pilot randomized controlled trial will provide a description of the characteristics of overdose survivors presenting to the ED; outline the implementation of PSS services research in ED settings, including PSS implementation of PSS supervision and activity tracking; and inform ED-initiated PSS-led overdose risk reduction interventions and future research to better understand the implementation and efficacy of these interventions., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05123027; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05123027., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/60277., (©Carrie Papa, Erin A McClure, Jenna McCauley, Louise Haynes, Timothy Matheson, Richard Jones, Lindsey Jennings, Tricia Lawdahl, Ralph Ward, Kathleen Brady, Kelly Stephenson Barth. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 17.09.2024.)

Background: Opioid-related fatalities are a leading cause of death in Ohio and nationally, with an increasing number of overdoses attributable to fentanyl. Rapid fentanyl test strips can identify fentanyl and some fentanyl analogs in urine samples and are increasingly being used to check illicit drugs for fentanyl before they are used. Fentanyl test strips are a promising harm reduction strategy; however, little is known about the real-world acceptability and impact of fentanyl test strip use. This study investigates fentanyl test strip distribution and education as a harm reduction strategy to prevent overdoses among people who use drugs., Methods: The research team will recruit 2400 individuals ≥ 18 years with self-reported use of illicit drugs or drugs purchased on the street within the past 6 months. Recruitment will occur at opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution programs in 16 urban and 12 rural Ohio counties. Participating sites will be randomized at the county level to the intervention or non-intervention study arm. A brief fentanyl test strip educational intervention and fentanyl test strips will be provided to participants recruited from sites in the intervention arm. These participants will be eligible to receive additional fentanyl test strips for 2 years post-enrollment. Participants recruited from sites in the non-intervention arm will not receive fentanyl test strip education or fentanyl test strips. All participants will be followed for 2 years post-enrollment using biweekly, quarterly, and 6-month surveys. Primary outcomes include (1) identification of perceived barriers and facilitating factors associated with incorporating fentanyl test strip education and distribution into opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution programs; (2) differences in knowledge and self-efficacy regarding how to test drugs for fentanyl and strategies for reducing overdose risk between the intervention and non-intervention groups; and (3) differences in non-fatal and fatal overdose rates between the intervention and non-intervention groups., Discussion: Findings from this cluster randomized controlled trial will contribute valuable information about the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of integrating fentanyl test strip drug checking in rural and urban communities in Ohio and help guide future overdose prevention interventions., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05463341. Registered on July 19, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05463341., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In the midst of the opioid crisis in the US, efforts to mitigate overdose risks have become paramount, leading some states to introduce mandates for coprescribing the life-saving overdose reversal drug naloxone. These mandates were designed to specifically address people receiving opioid analgesics who had an elevated risk for overdose. This included people receiving high opioid dosages, those concurrently using benzodiazepines, or those with a history of substance use disorder or overdose. Using a nationally representative, multipayer cohort of patients receiving prescription opioids, we investigated how naloxone codispensing rates changed at the state level from 2016 to 2021 among patients with an elevated risk for overdose. Then we used controlled interrupted time series analyses to assess mandates' longitudinal impact on naloxone codispensing in ten states that implemented mandates. We observed an immediate and significant increase in the naloxone codispensing rates in eight states after the implementation of mandates. Nevertheless, in five of these states, the codispensing rates exhibited a subsequent downward trend after the initial increase. State mandates show potential for improving naloxone codispensing; however, mandates alone might not be adequate for sustained change. Further research is needed to identify strategies complementing and enhancing the impact of mandates in combating the overdose crisis.

Background: Pharmacy has an important role in combating the opioid epidemic. However, there is a need for more consistency of programs and evidence-based practices across the country., Objectives: To describe how an evidence-based opioid misuse and overdose prevention program that originated in North Dakota was implemented in West Virginia and to compare program results between the two states including pharmacist interventions and patient screening for opioid misuse and overdose., Practice Description: This advancement in practice took place in participating North Dakota and West Virginia community pharmacies., Practice Innovation: An evidence-based program that originated in North Dakota was implemented in West Virginia. The details of this collaboration are outlined in this manuscript., Evaluation Methods: Program screening and pharmacist intervention data were collected using DocStation, an online pharmacy patient management platform., Results: Thirty-four pharmacies in West Virginia implemented the program. Between April 2022 and September 2023, a total of 34 West Virginia pharmacies conducted 449 documented screenings compared to 12,105 screenings by 81 pharmacies in North Dakota over the same time. There were differences between the states with regard to the proportion of individuals screened as high-risk for opioid use disorder and individuals at risk of accidental opioid overdose likely attributable to different demographics., Conclusion: An opioid misuse and prevention program was successfully implemented in two states, which can serve as a model to implement similar programs in other pharmacies across the United States., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest or financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Substance use stigma has been positioned as a major driver of drug toxicity mortality. In response, governmental and public health organizations across Canada have invested significant resources into mass media campaigns that target stigma. Many of these campaigns feature images or stories about people who use drugs (PWUD). Although stigma and drug toxicity death disproportionately impact racially and economically marginalized PWUD, these campaigns often over-represent White, middle-class individuals. This effectively ignores intersecting roles of racism and classism in the experience of stigma and drug toxicity mortality., Methods: To investigate how this pattern of representation might occur, we examined the development process of the British Columbia (BC) Government's "Stop Overdose" anti-stigma campaign launched in 2018. We aimed to identify strategic goals, decisions, and underlying ideas that could help explain the campaign's eventual focus on White, middle-class PWUD. Through a Freedom of Information request we obtained 320 pages of documents from the BC Government outlining the real-time development, testing, and evaluation of the first wave of the campaign. We analyzed these documents using reflexive thematic analysis., Results: We identified that campaign developers had a marked focus on challenging stereotypes about PWUD and humanizing PWUD, while ensuring the campaign was relevant to BC residents. To achieve these goals, campaign developers ultimately avoided images of what they deemed the inaccurately "stereotypical" marginalized drug user. Instead, they featured PWUD in more privileged social positions. By attaching labels like "co-worker" to this imagery, developers felt mainstream BC residents could relate to and have more empathy for these PWUD compared to marginalized PWUD., Conclusions: In effect, these strategies perpetuated the exclusion and dehumanization of marginalized PWUD facing disproportionate harms of the drug toxicity crisis. Since anti-stigma campaigns remain a common intervention, we highlight a need for strategic approaches informed by more critical perspectives on substance use stigma., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The ongoing overdose crisis in Canada has prompted efforts to increase access to a "safer supply" of prescribed alternatives to the unregulated drug supply. While safer supply programs predominantly distribute hydromorphone tablets, the Safer Alternatives for Emergency Response (SAFER) program in Vancouver, Canada offers a range of prescribed alternatives, including fentanyl patches. However, little is known about the effectiveness of fentanyl patches as safer supply. Drawing on the perspectives and experiences of program participants, we sought to qualitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the SAFER fentanyl patch program in meeting its intended aims, including reducing risk of overdose by decreasing reliance on the unregulated drug supply., Methods: As part of a larger mixed-methods evaluation of SAFER, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 fentanyl patch program participants between February 2022 and April 2023. Thematic analysis of interview data focused on program engagement, experiences, impacts, and challenges., Results: The flexible program structure, including lack of need for daily dispensation, the extended missed dose protocol, and community pharmacy patch distribution fostered engagement and enhanced autonomy. Improved management of withdrawal symptoms and cravings due to steady transdermal dosing led to reduced unregulated drug use and overdose risk. Participants also experienced economic benefits and improvements in overall health and quality of life. However, skin irritation and patch adhesion issues were key barriers to program retention., Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the value of including fentanyl patch safer supply in the substance use continuum of care and offer insights for innovations in delivery of this intervention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Christy Sutherland is the medical director for the PHS Community Services Society, a non-profit organization that operates the Safer Alternatives for Emergency Response (SAFER) program in partnership with Vancouver Coastal Health. Christy Sutherland also reports grants from Health Canada and consulting fees from AIDS Vancouver Island, outside the submitted work. Elizabeth Holliday is Director, Special Projects, Overdose Emergency Response and Harm Reduction at Vancouver Coastal Health. All other authors have declared no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Stimulant-related overdoses have increased dramatically, with almost 50% of overdoses in the United States now involving stimulants. Additionally, harm-reduction approaches are increasingly seen as key to reducing the negative impact of substance use. Contingency management (CM), the provision of financial incentives for abstinence, is the most effective treatment for stimulant use disorder, but historically has not been widely implemented. Many recent, large-scale implementation efforts have relied upon foundational CM protocols that may not sufficiently account for recent increases in the prevalence and lethality of stimulant use nor the growing preference for harm reduction versus abstinence-only frameworks., Argument: We argue the need to (1) consider whether and how CM protocols might be modified to address rising stimulant use and harm reduction frameworks and (2) make CM widely accessible so that it can reduce population-level stimulant use while ensuring that it is delivered with fidelity to its basic principles. Proposed changes include changing CM reinforcement schedules to emphasize treatment engagement and reductions in use in addition to abstinence, changing guidelines on the duration of and re-engagement in CM, investing in research on virtual CM, incentivizing providers and health systems to deliver CM, making it easier to purchase and use point-of-care drug screens, using direct-to-consumer marketing to increase demand for CM and adapting CM to the community in which it is being implemented., Conclusions: Our proposed modifications to contingency management (CM) protocols and accessibility may more effectively address rising stimulant use and align CM more closely with harm-reduction frameworks. Given the urgent need to reduce overdose deaths, developing and testing modified CM protocols may need to rely upon methods other than randomized controlled trials. Efforts to disseminate CM widely to reduce population-level stimulant use must be balanced with the need to maintain fidelity to CM's basic principles., (© 2024 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)

Issues: Overdose prevention centres (OPC) are non-residential spaces where people can use illicit drugs (that they have obtained elsewhere) in the presence of staff who can intervene to prevent and manage any overdoses that occur. Many reviews of OPCs exist but they do not explain how OPCs work., Approach: We carried out a realist review, using the RAMESES reporting standards. We systematically searched for and then thematically analysed 391 documents that provide information on the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of OPCs., Key Findings: Our retroductive analysis identified a causal pathway that highlights the feeling of safety - and the immediate outcome of not dying - as conditions of possibility for the people who use OPCs to build trust and experience social inclusion. The combination of safety, trust and social inclusion that is triggered by OPCs can - depending on the contexts in which they operate - generate other positive outcomes, which may include less risky drug use practices, reductions in blood borne viruses and injection-related infections and wounds, and access to housing. These outcomes are contingent on relevant contexts, including political and legal environments, which differ for women and people from racialised minorities., Conclusions: OPCs can enable people who live with structural violence and vulnerability to develop feelings of safety and trust that help them stay alive and to build longer term trajectories of social inclusion, with potential to improve other aspects of their health and living conditions., (© 2024 The Author(s). Drug and Alcohol Review published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.)

Background: Fatal opioid-related overdoses (OOD) continue to be a leading cause of preventable death across the US. Opioid Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution programs (OENDs) play a vital role in addressing morbidity and mortality associated with opioid use, but access to such services is often inequitable. We utilized a geographic information system (GIS) and spatial analytical methods to inform prioritized placement of OEND services in Massachusetts., Methods: We obtained addresses for OEND sites from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and address-level fatal OOD data for January 2019 to December 2021 from the Massachusetts Registry of Vital Records and Statistics. Using location-allocation approaches in ArcGIS Pro, we created p-median models using locations of existing OEND sites and fatal OOD counts to identify areas that should be prioritized for future OEND placement. Variables included in our analysis were transportation mode, distance from public schools, race and ethnicity, and location feasibility., Results: Three Massachusetts communities - Athol, Dorchester, and Fitchburg - were identified as priority sites for new OEND locations using location-allocation models based on capacity to maximize OOD prevention. Communities identified by the models for OEND placement had similar demographics and overdose rates (42.8 per 100,000 vs 40.1 per 100,000 population) to communities with existing OEND programs but lower naloxone kit distribution rates (2589 doses per 100,000 vs 3704 doses per 100,000). Further models demonstrated differential access based on location and transportation., Conclusion: Our analyses identified key areas of Massachusetts with greatest need for OEND services. Further, these results demonstrate the utility of using spatial epidemiological methods to inform public health recommendations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Kimmel is supported by K23DA054363 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In 2022, the Drug User Liberation Front's Compassion Club and Fulfillment Centre emerged as a groundbreaking initiative and research endeavor aimed at addressing the alarming rise in overdose deaths within Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. As the first of its kind, this pioneering model operated as a non-profit, low-barrier, and non-medicalized approach to regulating the volatility of the content of the illicit drug market in order to prevent overdose deaths. Going beyond traditional overdose prevention methods, the Drug User Liberation Front's Compassion Club and Fulfillment Centre not only provided supervised consumption services, but also supplied rigorously tested cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine at cost to club members. This intrinsic case study offers a unique perspective on the operation of Drug User Liberation Front's Compassion Club and Fulfillment Centre, delving into its inception, development, implementation, and the challenges it faced in its operation. Ultimately, the insights garnered from the Drug User Liberation Front's Compassion Club and Fulfillment Centre hold significant value for others interested in establishing similar programs or exploring de-medicalized approaches regulating substances in order to prevent overdose deaths., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Since April 2019, CA Bridge has worked with emergency departments (EDs) in diverse geographic and emergency care settings across California to scale up low-threshold buprenorphine access, patient navigation programs, harm reduction services, and take-home naloxone. Between April 2019 and June 2023, 268 (81.0%) of 331 acute care hospitals in California received funding and technical assistance from CA Bridge and completed data reporting. These hospitals provided navigation services during 279 025 patient encounters and gave patients buprenorphine in 89 549 ED visits. ( Am J Public Health . 2024;114(9):874-878. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307710).

Background: Take home naloxone (THN) programmes are effective at reducing opioid related mortality, but require high levels of distribution, including to the general public. Mass media campaigns can be effective in improving public understanding of a topic and encouraging behavior change. Whilst mass media campaigns focusing on naloxone have been developed internationally, there is a lack of research on their potential impact. We investigated the effects of components of a recent national mass media campaign (Scotland, UK) designed to improve public awareness of drug related deaths, and readiness to intervene., Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional online experimental study with a randomized design, conducted with a nationally representative sample. Participants (N = 1551; 52.6% female; age 46.1±16.5 years) were assessed on overdose knowledge and readiness to intervene after presentation of eight combinations of campaign components., Results: Compared to a basic campaign description, exposure to all types of campaign component were associated with higher overdose knowledge (p < .001), but not knowledge of what to do in response to an overdose (p = .374), or readiness to intervene (p= .286). The greatest effects were associated with a media rich audio-visual resource (animated video with a popular song on the soundtrack, and narrated by a well-known actor)., Conclusion: Our data suggest that harm reduction is an appropriate topic for large-scale mass media campaigns. However, effects may be limited to knowledge and awareness raising in the general public, and may be related to the types of media used. Audience segmentation is important and more general messaging about drug related deaths may be more appropriate for the majority of audiences., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Take-home naloxone (THN) programmes have been associated with reductions in opioid-related mortality. In response to high rates of drug-related deaths in Scotland, the Scottish Government commissioned the 'How to save a life' (HTSAL) mass media campaign to: (1) increase awareness of drug-related deaths and how to respond to an overdose, and (2) increase the supply of THN. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the campaign on the supply of THN., Methods: We used an interrupted time series design to assess the effect of the HTSAL mass media campaign on the national community supply of THN. The study time period was August 2020-December 2021. We modelled two key dates: the start of the campaign (week beginning (w/b) 30th of August 2021) and after the end of the main campaign (w/b 25th of October 2021)., Results: The total number of THN kits distributed in the community in Scotland during the study period was 27,064. The mean number of THN kits distributed per week (relative to the pre-campaign period), increased by 126% during the campaign and 57% post-campaign. In segmented regression analyses, the pre-campaign trend in the number of THN kits supplied was increasing by an average of 1% each week (RR=1.01, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.01, p<0.001). Once the campaign started, a significant change in level was observed, and the number of kits increased by 75% (RR=1.75, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.40, p<0.001). The trend during the campaign was stable (i.e. not increasing or decreasing) but a significant change in level was observed when the campaign ended, and the number of THN kits supplied decreased by 32% (RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.98, p = 0.042). The trend during the post-campaign period was stable., Conclusions: The HTSAL campaign had a short term, but large and significant impact, on the community supply of THN in Scotland. Mass media campaigns could be combined with other interventions and strategies to maintain the increased uptake of THN outside of campaign periods., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest This research was funded by the Scottish Government through a campaign grant awarded to the Scottish Drugs Forum. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. MA was employed by the Scottish Drugs Forum at the time of this work, but was not involved in the delivery of the HTSAL campaign. All other authors have no other declarations of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

This article discusses the use of substances among adolescents, the unacceptable overdose death rates they bear, and the relevant evidence-based harm reduction strategies available in primary care, including medications for opioid use disorder. Access to these medications, as well as to harm reduction strategies generally, is insufficient for adolescents. Many adolescents who use substances and who are most at risk for overdose regularly visit primary care, which is an appropriate setting for treatment and harm reduction delivery., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Objective: Mobile substance use treatment units are effective approaches to increase treatment access and reduce barriers to opioid use disorder (OUD) care. However, little is known about the economic costs of maintaining and operating these units. This study aimed to estimate the economic costs of starting and maintaining mobile units providing harm reduction, overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND), and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD)., Methods: As part of the HEALing Communities Study, four communities in Massachusetts (Bourne/Sandwich, Brockton, Gloucester, Salem) implemented mobile units offering OEND and MOUD (buprenorphine and naltrexone only); each selected different services tailored to their community. All provided MOUD linkage via telehealth, but only one offered in-person MOUD prescribing on the unit. We retrospectively collected detailed resource utilization data from invoices to estimate the direct economic costs from August 2020 through June 2022. Cost components were categorized into start-up and operating costs. We calculated total economic cost over the study period and the average monthly operating cost., Results: Implementing a mobile unit offering OEND and MOUD required a one-time median start-up cost of $59,762 (range: $52,062-$113,671), with 80 % of those costs attributed to the vehicle purchase. The median monthly operating cost was $14,464. The largest cost category for all mobile units was personnel costs. The monthly ongoing costs varied by community settings and services: approximately $5000 for two urban communities offering OEND and MOUD linkage via telehealth (Gloucester, Salem), $28,000 for a rural community (Bourne/Sandwich), and $23,000 for an urban community also providing in-person MOUD prescribing on the unit (Brockton)., Conclusion: The economic costs of mobile substance use treatment and harm reduction units are substantial but vary by community settings and services offered. Our results provide valuable community-level economic data to stakeholders and policymakers considering establishing and/or expanding mobile units with OEND and MOUD services. Further exploration of cost-effectiveness and efficiency should be considered across different settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To assist the state of Ohio in addressing the opioid epidemic, the Ohio Attorney General appointed experts in a variety of academic disciplines to the Scientific Committee on Opioid Prevention and Education (SCOPE). The focus of SCOPE is the application of scientific principles to the development of prevention and educational strategies for reducing substance use disorder and related harms (e.g., promoting naloxone awareness). Naloxone awareness is a step in the naloxone cascade, which is a useful model for understanding the sequential steps laypeople must take to prepare themselves to intervene using naloxone; other steps include training and previous administration experience. Prior work has explored correlates of these steps among individuals with risky substance use, but fewer studies have focused on broader populations containing potential bystanders (e.g., family and community members)., Methods: This study was a secondary data analysis of patients from three urban emergency departments. Subsamples differed across five models (n = 479-1208) and included opioid-exposed and -naïve participants. Logistic regression characterized clinically useful sociodemographic predictors (e.g., race, ethnicity, education, employment, housing status) of naloxone awareness, self-efficacy (which relates to training), and previous-overdose administration. Two additional logistic regressions tested associations between risk factors for witnessing an opioid overdose and two cascade steps (awareness and self-efficacy)., Results: Non-White race, Hispanic ethnicity, and lower education predicted not being aware of naloxone; non-White race also predicted lower naloxone self-efficacy, and older age predicted lack of previous-overdose administration. Having family members with risky opioid use was heavily associated with awareness, while personal substance-use behaviors and previous overdose witnessing were associated with both awareness and higher naloxone self-efficacy., Conclusions: Characteristics associated with lower likelihood of completing each cascade step highlight opportunities for targeted interventions. Specifically, findings indicated the importance of expanding naloxone education and training programs to more diverse populations and to family members of individuals with risky opioid use. Further, these findings demonstrate how a state-funded program such as SCOPE can have a positive impact on identifying strategies that may assist in reducing mortality associated with opioid overdose., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The following authors received compensation for time spent on the parent study through awards to their institutions from the Ohio Attorney General Office (Grant Number 12545): Rob Braun, Drs. Freiermuth, Brown, Lyons, and Punches. Dr. Littlefield received compensation for the parent study through consultant payments. Authors Petrovitch, Himes, Jump, and Sprague declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The overdose epidemic in the United States has intensified following the introduction of illicitly manufactured fentanyl to drug markets with recent estimates indicating 110,000 deaths in 2022 and longer-term trends adversely impacting national life expectancy. A period of incarceration has been identified as a critical touchpoint for overdose prevention given its strong association with risk of overdose. In this paper we describe efforts funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Overdose Data to Action (OD2A) grant to design and implement naloxone vending machines that provide free naloxone within county jails to returning citizens and those visiting county jail facilities., Methods: This study utilized three sources of data. First, we describe the results of a pre-implementation survey administered by technical assistance providers to 18 jails across the state of Michigan. Second, among the 6 jail facilities that accepted a naloxone vending machine we examine administrative data from Michigan Department of Health and Human Services on naloxone orders to look at changes 6-months before and after implementation. Third and lastly, we conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 6) with jail administrators (i.e., County Sheriffs) on the barriers and facilitators to implementing a naloxone vending machine., Results: Six facilities indicated they would accept a vending machine to distribute free naloxone. Overall, the total number of naloxone box orders that were distributed across all jail sites increased by 63.5 % from 4104 boxes pre-naloxone vending machine to 6708 boxes post-naloxone vending machine implementation. Qualitative interviews revealed that prior naloxone distribution efforts and foundational knowledge about opioids, overdose, and naloxone emerged as facilitators for vending machine implementation., Conclusion: This study illustrates the utility of policy-driven funding strategies aimed at mitigating accidental overdose deaths among a high-risk population while building community naloxone saturation efforts., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The current qualitative study examines the perspectives of women with opioid use disorder (OUD) and professionals that serve them on barriers to engaging in overdose prevention and harm reduction practices and recommendations for improving engagement., Method: Semistructured interviews ( N = 42) were conducted with women with a history of OUD ( n = 20), substance use disorder treatment professionals ( n = 12), and criminal legal professionals ( n = 10). The interviews were inductively coded to identify themes and subthemes regarding experiences with overdose and harm reduction practices., Results: Themes included heightened vulnerability to overdose, harm reduction challenges faced by women with OUD, and recommendations for overdose prevention and harm reduction practices. Heightened vulnerability to overdose included concerns about toxic supply and concerns about women's drug use behaviors. Challenges to women's harm reduction engagement included lack of knowledge and education about harm reduction tools and strategies and continued stigma toward harm reduction practices. Finally, recommendations for improving harm reduction engagement included increasing accessibility of harm reduction tools, expanding harm reduction education, and shifting away from "abstinence-only" paradigms., Conclusions: Finding ways to teach women with OUD about harm reduction, more effectively distribute harm reduction tools to them, and reduce stigma among providers and professionals is essential to reduce overdose risk for women with OUD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Background: The ongoing and evolving overdose epidemic highlights the need to translate research results into routine clinical practice to address urgent service delivery needs. Implementation science is a relatively new discipline intended to develop systematic, replicable, scalable strategies to accelerate this translation. This article presents a comprehensive review of implementation research funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)., Methods: The study identified all NIDA-funded research grants awarded in fiscal years 2007 through 2023 in treatment services or prevention research (n = 1111) and screened them to find those with a pre-specified implementation science component (n = 248). Using the text of the grant application, two reviewers independently coded the key characteristics of each study., Results: The characteristics of these grants, and trends over time, are described, and priority gap areas are identified. NIDA's implementation research grants have demonstrated increasing rigor in design and measurement., Conclusions: Growth in the portfolio has been driven in part by NIDA's investments in research-practice partnerships in the criminal-legal system, and by recent efforts to address the overdose epidemic., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Nothing to declare., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: In recent years, overdoses involving illicit cocaine, methamphetamine, and other stimulants have increased in the U.S. The unintentional consumption of stimulants containing illicit fentanyl is a major risk factor for overdoses, particularly in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Understanding the drug use patterns and strategies used by people who use stimulants (PWUS) to prevent overdose is necessary to identify risk and protective factors for stimulant and opioid-involved overdoses. Mixed-methods research with people who distribute drugs (PWDD) can also provide critical information into the mechanisms through which fentanyl may enter the stimulant supply, and the testing of drug samples can further triangulate PWUS and PWDD perspectives regarding the potency and adulteration of the drug supply. These epidemiological methods can inform collaborative intervention development efforts with community leaders to identify feasible, acceptable, and scalable strategies to prevent fatal and non-fatal overdoses in high-risk communities., Methods: Our overall objective is to reduce stimulant and opioid-involved overdoses in regions disproportionately affected by the overdose epidemic. To meet this long-term objective, we employ a multi-pronged approach to identify risk and protective factors for unintentional stimulant and opioid-involved overdoses among PWUS and use these findings to develop a package of locally tailored intervention strategies that can be swiftly implemented to prevent overdoses. Specifically, this study aims to [1] Carry out mixed-methods research with incarcerated and non-incarcerated people who use or distribute illicit stimulants to identify risk and protective factors for stimulant and opioid-involved overdoses; [2] Conduct drug checking to examine the presence and relative quantity of fentanyl and other adulterants in the stimulant supply; and [3] Convene a series of working groups with community stakeholders involved in primary and secondary overdose prevention in Massachusetts and Rhode Island to contextualize our mixed-methods findings and identify multilevel intervention strategies to prevent stimulant-involved overdoses., Discussion: Completion of this study will yield a rich understanding of the social epidemiology of stimulant and opioid-involved overdoses in addition to community-derived intervention strategies that can be readily implemented and scaled to prevent such overdoses in two states disproportionately impacted by the opioid and overdose crises: Massachusetts and Rhode Island., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Overdose prevention sites (OPS) are a harm reduction strategy that offer people who use drugs a variety of resources including but not limited to sterile supplies, linkage to healthcare resources, and intervention if an overdose occurs. OPS operate in over 120 countries and evidence has demonstrated they are an effective harm reduction strategy. Despite their success elsewhere, OPS remain federally illegal in the United States and thus there is limited research on their implementation and outcomes in the United States. This study aimed to identify Colorado healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes about OPS and determine if there is a correlation between healthcare providers with more knowledge about OPS having a more positive attitude about OPS., Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to healthcare providers in Colorado. Responses were collected in early 2022 and recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. Mean scores between 1 and 5 were calculated for each participant and analysis of variance methods were used to determine correlating demographic factors. A p value of ≤ 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance of all findings., Results: This study included 698 participants. A Pearson correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001) between provider knowledge and attitudes about OPS. Emergency medicine providers scored the highest in mean knowledge and attitude scores in comparison to all other specialties. Respondents affiliated with a harm reduction center exhibited the highest mean knowledge and attitude scores. Mean knowledge and attitude scores generally rose with respondents' increasing encounters with people who inject drugs in a typical workday, except when reaching nine or more encounters, where a sharp decline occurred., Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of education, exposure to harm reduction strategies, and inter-specialty collaboration in shaping healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes about OPS. The positive correlation between providers' knowledge and attitudes about OPS suggests that educating healthcare providers on harm reduction strategies, specifically OPS, may lead to reduced stigmatization of OPS among healthcare professionals., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: Illicitly manufactured fentanyl and its analogs are the primary drivers of opioid overdose deaths in the United States (U.S.). People who use drugs may be exposed to fentanyl or its analogs intentionally or unintentionally. This study sought to identify strategies used by rural people who use drugs to reduce harms associated with unintentional fentanyl exposure., Methods: This analysis focused on 349 semi-structured qualitative interviews across 10 states and 58 rural counties in the U.S conducted between 2018 and 2020. Interview guides were collaboratively standardized across sites and included questions about drug use history (including drugs currently used, frequency of use, mode of administration) and questions specific to fentanyl. Deductive coding was used to code all data, then inductive coding of overdose and fentanyl codes was conducted by an interdisciplinary writing team., Results: Participants described being concerned that fentanyl had saturated the drug market, in both stimulant and opioid supplies. Participants utilized strategies including: (1) avoiding drugs that were perceived to contain fentanyl, (2) buying drugs from trusted sources, (3) using fentanyl test strips, 4) using small doses and non-injection routes, (5) using with other people, (6) tasting, smelling, and looking at drugs before use, and (7) carrying and using naloxone. Most people who used drugs used a combination of these strategies as there was an overwhelming fear of fatal overdose., Conclusion: People who use drugs living in rural areas of the U.S. are aware that fentanyl is in their drug supply and use several strategies to prevent associated harms, including fatal overdose. Increasing access to harm reduction tools (e.g., fentanyl test strips, naloxone) and services (e.g., community drug checking, syringe services programs, overdose prevention centers) should be prioritized to address the polysubstance-involved overdose crisis. These efforts should target persons who use opioids and other drugs that may contain fentanyl., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Fueled by the prescription opioid overdose crisis and increased influx of illicitly manufactured fentanyl, fentanyl overdoses continue to be a public health crisis that has cost the US economy over $1 trillion in reduced productivity, health care, family assistance, criminal justice, and accounted for over 74,000 deaths in 2023. A recent demographic shift in the opioid crisis has led to a rise in overdose deaths among the Latinx population. Harm reduction interventions, including the use of naloxone and fentanyl test strips, have been shown to be effective measures at reducing the number of opioid overdose deaths. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize naloxone and fentanyl test strip interventions and public health policies targeted to Latinx communities., Methods: PubMed, CINHAL, Web of Science, Embase, and PsycINFO research databases using the keywords "fentanyl," "Latinx," "Harm Reduction," "Naloxone," and "Fentanyl Test Strips'' to identify studies published between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2023. Endnote and Covidence software were used to catalog and manage citations for review of studies. Subsequently, studies that met inclusion criteria were then summarized using resulting themes., Results: Twenty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria and were further abstracted for the scoping review. Of these articles, 77.7% (n = 21) included a naloxone intervention, while only 11.1% (n = 3) included a fentanyl test strip intervention. Furthermore, 30.1% (n = 8) of these studies were Latinx targeted, and 7.7% (n = 2) of the studies were adapted for Latinx populations. Four themes, including an overall lack of knowledge and awareness, a lack of access to harm reduction or opioid overdose prevention resources, an overall lack of culturally adapted and/or targeted interventions, and restrictive and punitive policies that limit the effectiveness of protective factors were highlighted in this scoping review., Conclusion: Limited published research exists on the use of emerging harm reduction behaviors, such as the use of naloxone and fentanyl test strips as community intervention strategies to prevent opioid overdose deaths. Even fewer publications exist on the targeting and cultural adaptation of harm reduction interventions responsive to Latinx communities, especially those using theoretical approaches or frameworks to support these interventions. Future research is needed to assess the unique needs of Latinx populations and to develop culturally responsive programs to prevent opioid-related overdose deaths among this population., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Illicit opioid overdose continues to rise in North America and is a leading cause of death. Mathematical modeling is a valuable tool to investigate the epidemiology of this public health issue, as it can characterize key features of population outcomes and quantify the broader effect of structural and interventional changes on overdose mortality. The aim of this study is to quantify and predict the impact of key harm reduction strategies at differing levels of scale-up on fatal and nonfatal overdose among a population of people engaging in unregulated opioid use in Toronto., Methods: An individual-based model for opioid overdose was built featuring demographic and behavioural variation among members of the population. Key individual attributes known to scale the risk of fatal and nonfatal overdose were identified and incorporated into a dynamic modeling framework, wherein every member of the simulated population encompasses a set of distinct characteristics that govern demographics, intervention usage, and overdose incidence. The model was parametrized to fatal and nonfatal overdose events reported in Toronto in 2019. The interventions considered were opioid agonist therapy (OAT), supervised consumption sites (SCS), take-home naloxone (THN), drug-checking, and reducing fentanyl in the drug supply. Harm reduction scenarios were explored relative to a baseline model to examine the impact of each intervention being scaled from 0% use to 100% use on overdose events., Results: Model simulations resulted in 3690.6 nonfatal and 295.4 fatal overdoses, coinciding with 2019 data from Toronto. From this baseline, at full scale-up, 290 deaths were averted by THN, 248 from eliminating fentanyl from the drug supply, 124 from SCS use, 173 from OAT, and 100 by drug-checking services. Drug-checking and reducing fentanyl in the drug supply were the only harm reduction strategies that reduced the number of nonfatal overdoses., Conclusions: Within a multi-faceted harm reduction approach, scaling up take-home naloxone, and reducing fentanyl in the drug supply led to the largest reduction in opioid overdose fatality in Toronto. Detailed model simulation studies provide an additional tool to assess and inform public health policy on harm reduction., (© 2024. The Author(s).)