Search

Objectives Serum free light chain (sFLC) measurements have inherent analytical limitations impacting sFLC clinical interpretation. We evaluated analytical and diagnostic performance of three polyclonal sFLC assays on four analytical platforms. Methods sFLC concentration was measured using Diazyme FLC assays (Diazyme) on cobas c501/c503 analyzer (Roche); Freelite assays (The Binding Site) on Optilite analyzer (The Binding Site) and cobas c501 analyzer and Sebia FLC ELISA assays (Sebia) on AP22 ELITE analyzer (DAS). Imprecision, linearity, method comparison vs. Freelite/Optilite, antigen excess detection and reference value verification were assessed. Diagnostic performance was compared on 120 serum samples and on follow-up samples of five patients with κ and λ monoclonal gammopathy. Results Method comparison showed excellent correlation with Freelite/Optilite method for all assays. A large proportional negative bias was shown for both Sebia κ and λ ELISA and a significant positive proportional bias for λ in the low ( Conclusions Important analytical limitations remain for all sFLC applications. Differences in reference values and diagnostic performance hamper interchangeability of sFLC assays. Assay specific sFLC decision guidelines are warranted.

Background Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), an alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone showed clinical activity and manageable safety in the phase 2 HORIZON study. We aimed to determine whether melflufen plus dexamethasone would provide a progression-free survival benefit compared with pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. Methods In this randomised, open-label, head-to-head, phase 3 study (OCEAN), adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were recruited from 108 university hospitals, specialist hospitals, and community-based centres in 21 countries across Europe, North America, and Asia. Eligible patients had an ECOG performance status of 0–2; must have had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, refractory to lenalidomide (within 18 months of randomisation) and to the last line of therapy; and have received two to four previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by age, number of previous lines of therapy, and International Staging System score, to either 28-day cycles of melflufen and dexamethasone (melflufen group) or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (pomalidomide group). All patients received dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. In the melflufen group, patients received melflufen 40 mg intravenously over 30 min on day 1 of each cycle and in the pomalidomide group, patients received pomalidomide 4 mg orally daily on days 1 to 21 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03151811, and is ongoing. Findings Between June 12, 2017, and Sept 3, 2020, 246 patients were randomly assigned to the melflufen group (median age 68 years [IQR 60–72]; 107 [43%] were female) and 249 to the pomalidomide group (median age 68 years [IQR 61–72]; 109 [44%] were female). 474 patients received at least one dose of study drug (melflufen group n=228; pomalidomide group n=246; safety population). Data cutoff was Feb 3, 2021. Median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 5·0–8·5; 165 [67%] of 246 patients had an event) in the melflufen group and 4·9 months (4·2–5·7; 190 [76%] of 249 patients had an event) in the pomalidomide group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·79, [95% CI 0·64–0·98]; p=0·032), at a median follow-up of 15·5 months (IQR 9·4–22·8) in the melflufen group and 16·3 months (10·1–23·2) in the pomalidomide group. Median overall survival was 19·8 months (95% CI 15·1–25·6) at a median follow-up of 19·8 months (IQR 12·0–25·0) in the melflufen group and 25·0 months (95% CI 18·1–31·9) in the pomalidomide group at a median follow-up of 18·6 months (IQR 11·8–23·7; HR 1·10 [95% CI 0·85–1·44]; p=0·47). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] of 228 in the melflufen group vs 26 [11%] of 246 in the pomalidomide group), neutropenia (123 [54%] vs 102 [41%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]). 27 [12%] patients in the melflufen group and 32 [13%] in the pomalidomide group had fatal treatment-emergent adverse events. Fatal treatment-emergent adverse events were considered possibly treatment related in two patients in the melflufen group (one with acute myeloid leukaemia, one with pancytopenia and acute cardiac failure) and four patients in the pomalidomide group (two patients with pneumonia, one with myelodysplastic syndromes, one with COVID-19 pneumonia). Interpretation Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed superior progression-free survival than pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma., Oncopeptides AB

PURPOSE Proteasome inhibitors are effective in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) but require parenteral administration and are associated with polyneuropathy. We investigated efficacy and toxicity of the less neurotoxic oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib combined with rituximab, in patients with relapsed WM. METHODS We conducted a multicenter phase I/II trial with ixazomib, rituximab, and dexamethasone (IRD). Induction consisted of eight cycles IRD wherein rituximab was started in cycle 3, followed by rituximab maintenance. Phase I showed feasibility of 4 mg ixazomib. Primary end point for phase II was overall response rate (ORR [≥ minimal response]) after induction. RESULTS A total of 59 patients were enrolled (median age, 69 years; range, 46-91 years). Median number of prior treatments was 2 (range, 1-7); 70% had an intermediate or high WM-IPSS (International Prognostic Scoring System for WM) score. After eight cycles, ORR was 71% (42 out of 59) (14% very good partial response [PR], 37% PR, and 20% minor response). Depth of response improved until month 12 (best ORR 85% [50 out of 59]: 15% very good PR, 46% PR, and 24% minor response). Median duration of response was 36 months. The average hematocrit level increased significantly (0.33-0.38 L/L) after induction ( P < .001). After two cycles of ixazomib and dexamethasone, immunoglobulin M levels decreased significantly (median 3,700-2,700 mg/dL, P < .0001). Median time to first response was 4 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. After median follow-up of 24 months (range, 7.4-54.3 months), progression-free survival and overall survival were 56% and 88%, respectively. Toxicity included mostly grade 2 or 3 cytopenias, grade 1 or 2 neurotoxicity, and grade 2 or 3 infections. No infusion-related reactions or immunoglobulin M flare occurred with use of subcutaneous rituximab. Quality of life improved significantly after induction. In total, 48 patients (81%) completed at least six cycles of IRD. CONCLUSION Combination of IRD shows promising efficacy with manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed or refractory WM.

Treatment results of AML in elderly patients are unsatisfactory. In an open label randomized phase II study, we investigated whether addition of the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor to intensive chemotherapy would improve outcome in this population. 102 AML patients > 65 years of age (median 69 (65–80)) were randomly assigned to standard chemotherapy (3 + 7) with or without oral selinexor 60 mg twice weekly (both arms n = 51), days 1–24. In the second cycle, cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1–6 with or without selinexor was given. CR/CRi rates were significantly higher in the control arm than in the investigational arm (80% (95% C.I. 69–91%) vs. 59% (45–72%; p = 0.018), respectively). At 18 months, event-free survival was 45% for the control arm versus 26% for the investigational arm (Cox-p = 0.012) and overall survival 58% vs. 33%, respectively (p = 0.009). AML and infectious complications accounted for an increased death rate in the investigational arm. Irrespective of treatment, MRD status after two cycles appeared to be correlated with survival. We conclude that the addition of selinexor to standard chemotherapy does negatively affect the therapeutic outcome of elderly AML patients. (Netherlands Trial Registry number NL5748 (NTR5902), www.trialregister.nl).

Shallow-depth sequencing of cell-free DNA, an inexpensive and standardized approach to obtain molecular information on tumors non-invasively, has been insufficiently explored for the diagnosis of lymphoma and disease follow-up. This study collected 318 samples, including longitudinal liquid and paired solid biopsies, from a prospectively- recruited cohort of 38 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 85 aggressive B-cell non-HL patients, represented by 81 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cases. Following sequencing, copy number alterations and viral read fractions were derived and analyzed. At diagnosis, liquid biopsies showed detectable copy number alterations in 84.2% of HL patients (88.6% for classical HL) and 74.1% of DLBCL patients. Of the DLBCL patients, copy number profiles between liquid-solid pairs were highly concordant (r=0.815±0.043); and, compared to tissue, HL liquid biopsies had abnormalities with higher amplitudes (P=0.010). This implies that tumor DNA is more abundant in plasma. Additionally, 39.5% of HL and 13.6% of DLBCL cases had a significantly elevated number of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA fragments, achieving a sensitivity of 100% compared to the current standard. A longitudinal analysis determined that, when detectable, copy number patterns were similar across (re)staging moments in refractory or relapsed patients. Further, the overall profile anomaly correlated highly with the total metabolic tumor volume (P

Background Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common and life-threatening complication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); there is an urgent unmet need for effective therapies. We aimed to evaluate the Janus kinase 1 inhibitor itacitinib versus placebo, both in combination with corticosteroids, for initial treatment of acute GVHD. Methods GRAVITAS-301 was an international, double-blind, adaptive (group sequential design) phase 3 study conducted at 129 hospitals and community practices in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had previously received allogeneic HSCT for a haematological malignancy, developed grades II-IV acute GVHD, and received up to 2 days of systemic corticosteroids. Patients were stratified by clinical standard-risk or high-risk acute GVHD and randomly assigned (1:1), via a centralised interactive voice response system, to receive either oral itacitinib (200 mg) or placebo once daily, both in addition to corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at day 28 (defined as the proportion of patients with complete response, very good partial response, or partial response 28 days after the start of treatment). For sample size determination, an absolute improvement in ORR at day 28 over standard therapy of 16% was considered clinically meaningful. Efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population; safety analyses included patients who received at least one dose of study drug. GRAVITAS-301 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03139604) and is complete. Findings Between July 19, 2017, and Oct 3, 2019, 439 patients were randomly assigned to receive either itacitinib plus corticosteroids (n=219; itacitinib group) or placebo plus corticosteroids (n=220; placebo group). 173 (39%) patients were female and 390 (89%) were White. At baseline, 107 (24%) of 439 patients (itacitinib 51 [23%] of 219; placebo 56 [25%] of 220) had clinical high-risk acute GVHD. The ORR at day 28 was 74% (95% CI 67middot6-79middot7; 162 of 219; complete response 53% [116 of 219]) for itacitinib and 66% (59middot7-72middot6; 146 of 220; complete response, 40% [89 of 220]) for placebo (odds ratio for ORR 1middot45, 95% CI 0middot96-2middot20; two-sided p=0middot078). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 185 (86%) of 215 itacitinib recipients and 178 (82%) of 216 placebo recipients, and most commonly included thrombocytopenia or platelet count decreased (78 [36%] vs 68 [31%]), neutropenia or neutrophil count decreased (49 [23%] vs 45 [21%]), anaemia (42 [20%] vs 26 [12%]), and hyperglycaemia (26 [12%] vs 28 [13%]). Treatment related deaths occurred in three of 215 patients (1%) in the itacitinib group and four of 216 (2%) in the placebo group. Interpretation The observed improvement in ORR at day 28 with the addition of itacitinib versus placebo to corticosteroids did not reach the prespecified significance level. Further studies might provide additional insight into the utility of selective JAK1 inhibition for the treatment of acute GVHD. Funding Incyte. Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

INTRODUCTION Calculation of the actual number of CD34+ cells in the collection product is based on the volume of the collected product and its concentration of CD34+ cells measured in the lab. The number of CD34+ cells infused correlates closely with the pace of hematopoietic reconstitution following autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. METHODS We studied peripheral blood stem cell collections in a single apheresis center with two Spectra Optia devices, using mononuclear cell collection or continuous mononuclear cell collection procedures. The collection volume displayed by the apheresis device was compared with the volume determined by a weight-based method. RESULTS Fifty-two consecutive CD34 collections in 35 different donors (range 1-4 daily procedures per donor) were analyzed. The machines reported larger collection volumes (P

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative treatment option in both adult and pediatric patients with malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. Chimerism analysis, which determines the donor or recipient origin of hematopoietic cells in HSCT recipients, is an essential aspect of post-HSCT follow-up.Objectives: To review the current literature and develop Belgian consensus guidelines for the use of chimerism analysis in the standard of care after allogeneic HSCT.Methods: Non-systematic review of the literature in consultancy with the members of the BHS transplantation committee.Results: Clinical application with regards to prediction of graft failure or relapse as well as cell source are reviewed. A consensus guideline on the use of chimerism analysis after HSCT is presented.Conclusion: Monitoring of the dynamics or kinetics of a patient's chimerism status by serial analysis at fixed time points, as well as on suspicion of relapse or graft failure, is needed to monitor engraftment levels, as well as disease control and possible relapse.

Terapia de inducción estándar; Volasertib adyuvante; Leucemia mieloide aguda Standard Induction Therapy; Adjunctive Volasertib; Acute Myeloid Leukemia Teràpia d'inducció estàndard; Volasertib adjuvant; Leucèmia mieloide aguda In this phase 3 trial, older patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive the polo-like kinase inhibitor, volasertib (V; 350 mg intravenous on days 1 and 15 in 4-wk cycles), combined with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC; 20 mg subcutaneous, twice daily, days 1–10; n = 444), or LDAC plus placebo (P; n = 222). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Primary ORR analysis at recruitment completion included patients randomized ≥5 months beforehand; ORR was 25.2% for V+LDAC and 16.8% for P+LDAC (n = 371; odds ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95–2.89]; P = 0.071). At final analysis (≥574 OS events), median OS was 5.6 months for V+LDAC and 6.5 months for P+LDAC (n = 666; hazard ratio 0.97 [95% CI, 0.8–1.2]; P = 0.757). The most common adverse events (AEs) were infections/infestations (grouped term; V+LDAC, 81.3%; P+LDAC, 63.5%) and febrile neutropenia (V+LDAC, 60.4%; P+LDAC, 29.3%). Fatal AEs occurred in 31.2% with V+LDAC versus 18.0% with P+LDAC, most commonly infections/infestations (V+LDAC, 17.1%; P+LDAC, 6.3%). Lack of OS benefit with V+LDAC versus P+LDAC may reflect increased early mortality with V+LDAC from myelosuppression and infections. This study was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.

The prevention of relapse is the major therapeutic challenge in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have obtained a complete remission (CR) on intensive chemotherapy. In this randomized phase 3 study (HOVON97) in older patients (≥60 years) with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory anemia with excess of blasts, in CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after at least 2 cycles of intensive chemotherapy, we assessed the value of azacitidine as postremission therapy with respect to disease-free survival (DFS; primary end point) and overall survival (OS; secondary end point). In total, 116 eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to either observation (N = 60) or azacitidine maintenance (N = 56; 50 mg/m2, subcutaneously, days 1-5, every 4 weeks) until relapse, for a maximum of 12 cycles. Fifty-five patients received at least 1 cycle of azacitidine, 46 at least 4 cycles, and 35 at least 12 cycles. The maintenance treatment with azacitidine was feasible. DFS was significantly better for the azacitidine treatment group (logrank; P = .04), as well as after adjustment for poor-risk cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and platelet count at randomization (as surrogate for CR vs CRi; Cox regression; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.95; P = .026). The 12-month DFS was estimated at 64% for the azacitidine group and 42% for the control group. OS did not differ between treatment groups, with and without censoring for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Rescue treatment was used more often in the observation group (n = 32) than in the azacitidine maintenance group (n = 9). We conclude that azacitidine maintenance after CR/CRi after intensive chemotherapy is feasible and significantly improves DFS. The study is registered with The Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR1810) and EudraCT (2008-001290-15).

Despite the fact that 80% of adult acute myeloid leukaemia patients reach complete morphological remission after induction chemotherapy, many of them relapse. Many studies have shown that detection of minimal residual disease (defined as 'any detectable evidence of persistent leukaemic cells during complete morphological remission') has an added value in prediction of relapse and survival, and is more than just a surrogate marker for already known risk factors in AML. As such, the behaviour of the disease during treatment might become equally or even more important to decide whether or not an upgrade of treatment (such as an allogeneic stem cell transplantation) is necessary to improve outcome. However, there are still many open issues as to what the ideal time point is to measure MRD, which threshold is clinically significant, what sample (peripheral blood or bone marrow) should be used and how we can standardize tests so that results from different labs become comparable. This review gives an overview of currently available evidence regarding technical issues, prognostic impact and MRD-directed treatment in AML.

TPS7075 Background: A novel genomically defined subset of higher-risk MDS (HR-MDS) patients with an actionable target characterized by overexpression of RARA has been identified (McKeown 2017). Approximately 30% of HR-MDS patients are RARA-positive (RARA+) by a blood-based biomarker test (Vigil, 2017). Biologically targeted therapy with tamibarotene, an oral selective RARα agonist, has potential to provide clinical benefit for RARA+ HR-MDS patients, irrespective of mutation or cytogenetic risk. Initial clinical data in RARA+ R/R HR-MDS patients treated with tamibarotene showed myeloid differentiation, improved blood counts, and reduced bone marrow blasts, including one patient who achieved marrow complete remission with hematologic improvement (Jurcic 2017). Tamibarotene in combination with azacitidine (aza) showed high complete response rates (CR) with rapid onset of response in RARA+ newly diagnosed (ND) unfit AML patients, including those with low blast count (≤ 30%) AML, and a majority of patients achieved or maintained transfusion independence (de Botton 2020). Tamibarotene/aza was generally well tolerated with no increase in myelosuppression compared to aza alone (de Botton 2020). Historical precedent demonstrating similar clinical outcomes in HR-MDS and AML, particularly low blast count AML (Estey 2021), supports further development of tamibarotene/aza in HR-MDS to improve clinical outcomes of standard of care treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMAs). Methods: This Phase 3, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will compare activity of tamibarotene/aza to placebo/aza in RARA+ patients with ND HR-MDS. The primary objective is to characterize and compare the CR rate of tamibarotene/aza vs placebo/aza, with secondary objectives to characterize ORR, EFS, OS, transfusion independence rate, time to and duration of initial and complete responses, and safety. Approximately 190 patients will be randomized 2:1, providing 90% power to detect the difference in CR rates between the experimental and control arms, with a one-sided alpha of 0.025. Patients must be RARA+ based on the investigational biomarker test, ND with HR-MDS by WHO classification (Arber 2016), classified by IPSS-R risk category as very high, high, or intermediate risk with a blast count > 5% at study entry. Patients suitable for transplant at screening, or with prior treatment for MDS with any HMA, chemotherapy or transplant are excluded. Aza will be administered at 75 mg/m2 IV/SC daily on days 1-7 (or 1-5, 8-9) followed by tamibarotene/placebo at 6 mg BID orally days 8-28 of each 28-day cycle. Response will be assessed per modified IWG MDS criteria (Cheson 2006). The SELECT-MDS-1 trial opened in February 2021, recruitment is ongoing, with sites located in North America, Israel, and Europe. Clinical trial information: NCT04797780.

Simple Summary Treatment results of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients are unsatisfactory. We investigated in an open label randomized phase II study whether addition of tosedostat, an aminopeptidase inhibitor, to intensive chemotherapy would improve outcome in this population. 231 AML patients > 65 years of age were randomly assigned to receive standard chemotherapy with or without tosedostat for two cycles. We found that complete bone marrow leukemia clearance was not significantly different between both arms. After two years, survival was 33% for the standard arm versus 18% for the tosedostat arm. More patients died due to infectious complications in the tosedostat arm than after standard treatment. Also, a cardiac rhythm abnormality called atrial fibrillation was more often seen in the tosedostat arm. We conclude that the addition of tosedostat to standard chemotherapy does negatively affect the therapeutic outcome of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Abstract Treatment results of AML in elderly patients are unsatisfactory. We hypothesized that addition of tosedostat, an aminopeptidase inhibitor, to intensive chemotherapy may improve outcome in this population. After establishing a safe dose in a run-in phase of the study in 22 patients, 231 eligible patients with AML above 65 years of age (median 70, range 66–81) were randomly assigned in this open label randomized Phase II study to receive standard chemotherapy (3+7) with or without tosedostat at the selected daily dose of 120 mg (n = 116), days 1–21. In the second cycle, patients received cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-6 with or without tosedostat. CR/CRi rates in the 2 arms were not significantly different (69% (95% C.I. 60–77%) vs 64% (55–73%), respectively). At 24 months, event-free survival (EFS) was 20% for the standard arm versus 12% for the tosedostat arm (Cox-p = 0.01) and overall survival (OS) 33% vs 18% respectively (p = 0.006). Infectious complications accounted for an increased early death rate in the tosedostat arm. Atrial fibrillation was more common in the tosedostat arm as well. The results of the present study show that the addition of tosedostat to standard chemotherapy does negatively affect the therapeutic outcome of elderly AML patients.

Data on clinical use of ponatinib are limited. This prospective registry aimed to evaluate outcomes of ponatinib treatment in routine practice over 3 years (2016–2019) in Belgium (NCT03678454). Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were treated with ponatinib per current label. Fifty patients (33 CML and 17 Ph+ ALL) were enrolled. Fifty-five percent of CML and 29% of Ph+ ALL patients had received ≥3 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Reasons for starting ponatinib were intolerance (40%), relapse or refractoriness (28%) to previous TKIs, progression (16%), or T315I mutation (16%). Median follow-up was 15 months for CML and 4.5 months for Ph+ ALL patients. Best response was a major molecular response in 58% of CML and 41% of Ph+ ALL patients. Of 20 patients who started ponatinib due to intolerance to previous TKIs, 9 (64%) CML and 4 (67%) Ph+ ALL achieved a major molecular response. Three-year estimates of overall survival were 85.3% and 85.6%, respectively, in CML and Ph+ ALL patients; estimated progression-free survival was 81.6% and 48.9%. Adverse reactions were reported in 34 patients (68%); rash (26%) and dry skin (10%) were most common. Reported cardiovascular adverse reactions included vascular stenosis (3), arterial hypertension (2), chest pain (1), palpitations (1), and vascular occlusion (1). This Belgian registry confirms results from the PACE clinical trial and supports routine ponatinib use in CML and Ph+ ALL patients who are resistant or intolerant to previous TKIs or with the T315I mutation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00277-021-04507-x.

COVID-19 is a severe infectious complication in patients with underlying medical conditions such as having undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). This prospective survey reports outcome on 272 COVID-19 patients from 19 countries having undergone allogeneic (n = 175) or autologous (n = 97) HCT reported to the EBMT registry or to the GETH. All patients had the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 documented by PCR. Patients were included in this analysis if COVID-19 diagnosis was before April 10, 2020. The overall survival was estimate by using the Kaplan Meier methods, considering the death due to any cause as an event and the time from COVID-19 infection to the latest follow-up as survival time; difference between groups were tested by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate risk factor analysis for overall survival were performed with the Cox regression model. The median age was 54.4 years (1.0 - 80.3) for allogeneic and 60.9 years (7.7 - 73.4) for autologous HCT patients. 20 patients were children (< 18 years of age; median age 11.3 (1.0 - 16.9)). The median time from HCT to diagnosis of COVID-19 was 13.7 months (0.2 - 254.3) in allogeneic and 25.0 months (-0.9 - 350.3) in autologous recipients. Lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) developed in 84.8% and 21.5% were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). At the time of analysis, 68/238 (28.6%) patients had died (47/155 allogeneic patients; 21/83 autologous patients). No follow-up had been received on 34 patients. The median time from infection to death was 19 days (0-102). Five patients were reported to have other primary causes of death than COVID-19. Of the patients reported to be alive, the median follow-up was 44 days. 144 (84.7%) patients (93 allogeneic; 51 autologous) had virologic resolution of the COVID-19 infection having at least one negative PCR. 26 patients were alive and known to be still COVID-19 positive (15 allogeneic; 11 autologous). For 34 patients the resolution status was unknown. Factors influencing the likelihood of resolution in multivariate analysis were underlying diagnosis (p=.01) and longer time from transplant to diagnosis of COVID-19 (p=.035). Overall survival at 6 weeks from COVID-19 diagnosis was 76.8% and 83.8% in allogeneic and autologous HCT recipients (p =ns), respectively (figure 1). Children (n=20) tended to do better with a 6-week survival of 95.0% although the difference was not significantly different (p =.12). In multivariate analysis of the total population older age (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.05 - 1.51; p = .01) increased the risk and better performance status decreased the risk for fatal outcome (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.69 - 0.90; p = .0003). The same factors had significant impact on overall survival in allogeneic HCT recipients (age HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.05 - 1.55; p=.01; performance status HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68 - 0.92); p=.002) while only age impacted survival among autologous HCT patients (data not shown). Other transplant factors such as underlying diagnosis, time from HCT to diagnosis of COVID-19, graft-vs-host disease, or ongoing immunosuppression did not have a significant impact on overall survival. We conclude that HCT patients are at an increased risk compared to the general population to develop LRTD, require admission to ICU, and have increased mortality in COVID-19. Figure 1 Disclosures Duarte: Incyte Corporation: Other: Has received speaker and advisor fees. Kwon:Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mielke:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: received via my institution, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Other: received via my institution , Speakers Bureau; Bellicum: Honoraria, Other: received via my institution, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other: received via my institution , Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: received via my institution , Speakers Bureau; KIADIS Pharma: Honoraria, Other: received via my institution , Speakers Bureau; DNA Prime: Honoraria, Other: received via my institution , Speakers Bureau. López Jiménez:MSD: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

The treatment of older, unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is challenging. Based on preclinical data of Bruton tyrosine kinase expression/phosphorylation and ibrutinib cytotoxicity in AML blasts, we conducted a randomized phase 2 multicenter study to assess the tolerability and efficacy of the addition of ibrutinib to 10-day decitabine in unfit (ie, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index ≥3) AML patients and higher risk myelodysplasia patients (HOVON135/SAKK30/15 trial). In total, 144 eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to either 10-day decitabine combined with ibrutinib (560 mg; sequentially given, starting the day after the last dose of decitabine) (n = 72) or to 10-day decitabine (n = 72). The addition of ibrutinib was well tolerated, and the number of adverse events was comparable for both arms. In the decitabine plus ibrutinib arm, 41% reached complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR/CRi), the median overall survival (OS) was 11 months, and 2-year OS was 27%; these findings compared with 50% CR/CRi, median OS of 11.5 months, and 2-year OS of 21% for the decitabine group (not significant). Extensive molecular profiling at diagnosis revealed that patients with STAG2, IDH2, and ASXL1 mutations had significantly lower CR/CRi rates, whereas patients with mutations in TP53 had significantly higher CR/CRi rates. Furthermore, multicolor flow cytometry revealed that after 3 cycles of treatment, 28 (49%) of 57 patients with available bone marrow samples had no measurable residual disease. In this limited number of cases, measurable residual disease revealed no apparent impact on event-free survival and OS. In conclusion, the addition of ibrutinib does not improve the therapeutic efficacy of decitabine. This trial was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NL5751 [NTR6017]) and has EudraCT number 2015-002855-85.

Hyperproliferative crises with hyperleukocytosis occur frequently in the disease course of refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Palliative cytoreduction aims to control blast count in order to avoid life-threatening complications and preserve quality of life in patients unfit for intensive treatment. In our center, low-dose intravenous melphalan is sometimes used with this intent.We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with AML who were treated with low-dose intravenous melphalan (15-30 mg/mThirty patients with AML who received low-dose melphalan (15-25 mg/mIntravenous low-dose melphalan is effective, quick and safe as palliative cytoreductive therapy in patients with hyperproliferative AML. It can be considered in palliative care of patients refractory to prior treatment with preserving acceptable quality of life. Our small retrospective cohort is the first to report the use of low-dose intravenous melphalan as palliative cytoreductive treatment in this population.

Objectives To describe real-world management and clinical and economic outcomes of patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in Belgium, Greece and Switzerland. Methods This descriptive, retrospective medical chart review collected patient-level data in 2018 from adults with ≥1 minimal residual disease (MRD) test during front-line ALL treatment. Data were stratified by MRD status. Results Eighty-two patients were included (median age 44 years, 23 % Philadelphia chromosome-positive; MRD-positive: n = 17, MRD-negative: n = 50, MRD result unknown: n = 15). HyperCVAD (32 %) and HOVON (26 %) were the most frequently used front-line treatment protocols; 22 % of patients received stem cell transplantation. Overall, 76 % of ALL patients were hospitalized (mean 1.1 hospitalization/month). Complete hematological response (CRh) occurred in 66/82 patients (80 %). Median relapse-free survival from CRh was 32.7 months (MRD-positive: 11.7 months; MRD-negative: 33.3 months). Median overall survival from diagnosis was 28.9 months (MRD-positive: 15.3 months; MRD-negative: not reached). Most patients (88 %) were MRD tested during induction; testing rates considerably decreased thereafter (39 % during consolidation). Conclusions B-cell precursor ALL represents a clinical burden and impacts healthcare resources; MRD-positive patients have worse prognosis than MRD-negative patients. Efforts should be made to adhere to recommendations for MRD testing in clinical guidelines.

Objectives Invasive fungal infections caused by Lomentospora prolificans are associated with very high mortality rates and can be challenging to treat given pan-drug resistance to available antifungal agents. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation and outcomes in a cohort of patients with invasive L prolificans infections. Methods We performed a retrospective review of medical records of patients with invasive L prolificans infection in the FungiScope® registry of rare invasive fungal infections. Patients diagnosed between 01 January 2008 and 09 September 2019 were included in for analysis. Results The analysis included 41 patients with invasive L prolificans infection from eight different countries. Haematological/oncological malignancies were the most frequent underlying disease (66%), disseminated infection was frequent (61%), and the lung was the most commonly involved organ (44%). Most infections (59%) were breakthrough infections. Progression/deterioration/treatment failure was observed in 23/40 (58%) of patients receiving antifungal therapy. In total, 21/41 (51%) patients, and 77% of patients with underlying haematological/oncological malignancy, had a fatal outcome attributed to invasive fungal infection. Combination antifungal therapy was frequent (24/40) and associated with improved survival. In particular, treatment regimens including terbinafine were significantly associated with higher treatment success at final assessment (P = .012), with a positive trend observed for treatment regimens that included voriconazole (P = .054). Conclusions Lomentospora prolificans infections were associated with mortality rates of 77% and above in patients with underlying haematological/oncological malignancies and those with disseminated infections. While combination therapy is the preferred option for now, the hope lies with novel antifungals currently under development.

Background Iclusig (ponatinib) is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for adult patients with chronic, accelerated or blast phase CML resistant or intolerant to nilotinib or dasatinib or with Ph+ ALL resistant or intolerant to dasatinib or for patients with the T315I mutation. Long-term efficacy and safety of ponatinib have been demonstrated in clinical trials, but real-world data are still limited. Here, we report the data on ponatinib use in CML and Ph+ ALL patients in routine clinical practice collected over 3 years in Belgium. Methods This ongoing prospective registry (NCT03678454) is conducted in Belgium and includes patients ≥18 years of age eligible for ponatinib treatment per product label. Data on demographics, medical history, disease characteristics, treatment patterns, treatment outcomes and safety were collected for patients enrolled from 1 March 2016 (ponatinib reimbursement in Belgium) onwards. Median follow-up was 15 and 4.5 months for CML and Ph+ ALL patients, respectively. All analyses were descriptive. The study received Ethics Committee approval and patients' consents were collected as per Helsinki Declaration. Results In total, 50 patients (33 CML and 17 Ph+ ALL) were enrolled from 20 hospitals. The median age of CML and Ph+ ALL patients was 58 and 56 years, respectively. 91% of CML and 94% of Ph+ ALL patients had received ≥2, and 54% of CML and 29% of Ph+ ALL patients had received ≥ 3 prior TKIs. Potential risk factors for TKI cardiovascular toxicity were observed: hypertension (17 patients), history of cardiovascular disease (19), smoking (13), hypercholesterolemia (6), hyperlipidemia (5) and diabetes (8). The reasons for starting ponatinib were: intolerance to previous TKIs (20, 40%), refractoriness to previous TKIs (14, 28%), disease progression (8, 16%) or T315I mutation (8, 16%). At entry, 22 patients (44%; 11 CML and 11 Ph+ ALL) had a confirmed BCR-ABL mutation. Of these, 12 (55%; 6 CML and 6 Ph+ ALL) had the T315I mutation. Starting doses of ponatinib in CML patients were: 45 mg (70%), 30 mg (12%) and 15 mg (15%) once daily. One patient with CML started with 15 mg every 2 days. Starting doses in Ph+ ALL patients were: 45 mg (76%), 30 mg (12%) and 15 mg (12%). The median treatment duration was 380 days (range 15-2777) for CML patients and 123 days (range 13-2114) for Ph+ ALL patients, which included recently enrolled patients. Major molecular response (MMR) was achieved as best response in 19 (58%) CML patients and 7 (41%) Ph+ ALL patients; while 2 (6%) of CML and 3 (18%) of Ph+ ALL patients achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) as best response. Of patients who started ponatinib due to intolerance to previous TKIs, 9 CML (64%) and 4 Ph+ ALL (67%) achieved MMR. There were 57 cases (38 in CML and 19 in Ph+ ALL) of dose reduction or interruption, due to AEs (74%), to prevent AEs (25%) and other reason (2%). There were 24 cases (19 in CML and 5 in Ph+ ALL) of dose increase: due to good tolerance of treatment (54%) and absent or low response (46%). At time of analysis, 29 patients (15 CML and 14 Ph+ ALL) had discontinued treatment, for the following reasons: AEs (34%), planned allogeneic transplantation (21%), disease progression (14%), intolerance (3%) and other reasons (28%). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 34 patients (68%); the most common were rash (26%) and dry skin (10%). Six (12%) patients reported ≥1 treatment-related serious AE (SAE): thrombocytopenia (2), palpitations (1), hypertension (1), pneumonia (1), coeliac artery stenosis (1), cholecystitis (1) and hyponatremia (1). One patient, with a history of congenital cardiomyopathy and aortic prosthesis, reported 3 serious cardiovascular events; these were considered as not related to ponatinib by the investigator. Conclusion Results from this real-world Belgian registry support the use of ponatinib in CML and Ph+ ALL patients who are resistant or intolerant to previous TKIs or have the T315I mutation. Most CML and a large proportion of Ph+ ALL patients obtained deep molecular responses. No new safety signals emerged with ponatinib treatment. The obtained results were in line with those of the PACE clinical trial, with the frequency of cardiovascular events apparently lower, possibly due to selection or improved monitoring of patients, or possible under-reporting vs clinical trial. Longer follow-up will be done to assess the long-term clinical efficiency in this real-life population. Disclosures André: Celgene: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Takeda Millenium: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding. Bailly:Incyte Biosciences: Other: Local PI of the Study. De Becker:Celgene: Other: ad hoc member of advisory board; Pfizer: Other: ad hoc member of advisory board; Sanofi Pasteur: Other: ad hoc member of advisory board; Incyte: Other: ad hoc member of advisory board. Deeren:Alexion, Amgen, Janssen, Roche, Sunesis, Takeda, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bekaert:Incyte Biosciences: Employment. Beck:Incyte Biosciences: Employment. Selleslag:INCYTE: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses.

Off-the-shelf allogeneic CAR T cells derived from healthy donor cells have the potential to overcome many of the issues associated with the time-consuming manufacturing of autologous CAR T cells. However, adoptive transfer of allogeneic T cells carries the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Most of the clinical experience with allogeneic CAR T cells is based on gene editing to eliminate T cell receptor (TCR) to mitigate the risk of GvHD. While clearly effective, the downsides of gene editing include multiple manufacturing steps requiring multiple clinical grade reagents, thus extending culture times, which can be associated with T cell exhaustion. As an alternative, we have explored short hairpin RNA (shRNA) as a means to knockdown TCR expression at the mRNA level. This shRNA is co-expressed along with the CAR in a single clinical grade vector, therefore requiring just one step of genetic modification. CYAD-211 is an allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T that co-expresses a shRNA targeting CD3z which results in reduction of cell surface TCR expression. IMMUNICY-1 is an ongoing open-label Phase 1 trial (NCT04613557) designed to evaluate CYAD-211 in adult patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) following at least two prior MM regimens. Patients receive non-myeloablative preconditioning (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m²/day and fludarabine 30 mg/m²/day, for 3 days) followed by a single CYAD-211 infusion in a 3+3 dose escalation design evaluating three dose-levels (DL): 30x10 6, 100x10 6 and 300x10 6 cells/infusion. As of July 29, 2021, nine patients were enrolled across the 3 DLs. Patients had received a median of four prior lines of treatment. Seventy-eight percent of patients were previously exposed to all three major MM drug classes (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and anti-CD38 antibody therapy). Eight patients had prior autologous stem cell transplantation. CYAD-211 was well tolerated. One patient developed grade 1 cytokine release syndrome. Two patients had Grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities possibly related to the experimental treatment. Two patients experienced infectious adverse events (1 grade 1 rhinitis and 1 grade 2 upper respiratory infection). There was no neurologic toxicity and no GvHD. There was no dose-limiting toxicity. Eight patients were evaluated for activity per IMWG criteria. Two patients achieved partial response at dose-levels 1 and 2 while 5 patients had stable disease (SD). One patient with an ongoing SD (3 months +) showed evidence of reduction in size of plasmacytomas. Analysis of peripheral blood samples by molecular methods confirmed the engraftment of CYAD-211. All patients had detectable CAR T cells. However, the engraftment was short lasting (3-4 weeks). There was a correlation between the depth of lymphodepletion and engraftment. There was also a dose-response in terms of CYAD-211 kinetics with a level neighboring 8,000 copies of CAR T per microgram of input DNA in patients at DL3. These early data indicate that CYAD-211 is well tolerated with a good safety profile. While further study is required to fully understand the anti-BCMA potency of the CAR used in this trial, the lack of observed GvHD despite engraftment of CYAD-211 provides proof of concept of the safe administration of CAR T using a shRNA-allogeneic platform. The lack of sustained engraftment of CYAD-211 can be explained by rejection of the allogeneic cells by the recovering immune system of the recipient and calls for exploring the role of augmented lymphodepletion. Furthermore, given the ability to include multiple shRNA within the single CAR vector, future strategies will also examine knocking down other molecules that are important in driving immune rejection. Disclosures Al-Homsi: BMS: Other: Independent Medical Education Grant; Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy; Celyad Oncology: Other: Advisory Board. Deeren: Alexion: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Nishihori: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Meuleman: iTeos Therapeutics: Consultancy. Abdul-Hay: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau. Braun: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Lonez: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Dheur: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Alcantar-Orozco: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Gilham: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Flament: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Lehmann: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment.

While CAR T cell therapy has delivered impressive clinical efficacy in B cell malignancies, similar levels of clinical activity have not been demonstrated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). One underlying reason for this lack of translation is the relative paucity of validated CAR T targets. Major Histocompatibility Complex Class 1 related proteins MICA and MICB along with the UL16 binding proteins 1-6 (ULBP1-6) are frequently over-expressed on AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) blasts. The Natural Killer Group 2D (NKG2D) is a single receptor able to bind MICA, MICB and ULBP1-6, thus providing a potentially powerful approach that could be exploited to target this family of targets thereby providing a novel CAR T approach for AML/MDS. Expressing the NKG2D receptor fused to the human CD3z cytoplasmic domain generates a CAR that, when expressed in primary T cells, generates a CAR T product (termed CYAD-01) that showed good anti-tumor activity in preclinical models. In clinical trials, CYAD-01 showed a good tolerability profile but with a disappointing level of clinical activity when combined with cyclophosphamide / fludarabine preconditioning (DEPLETHINK trial, NCT03466320). We hypothesised that the transient expression of MICA/MICB on the CAR T itself may inhibit the activity of the NKG2D CAR through self-targeting and consequent fratricide. We developed a single shRNA able to knockdown both MICA and MICB. Co-expression of this shRNA with the NKG2D CAR generated a second generation CAR T product termed CYAD-02 which was examined in a highly similar AML/MDS patient population and preconditioning regimen as employed in the DEPLETHINK trial. CYAD-02 was evaluated in the the first-in-human CYCLE-1 trial (NCT04167696) in patients with r/r AML/MDS. The dose-escalation phase evaluated three dose-levels (DL) (1x10 8, 3x10 8 and 1x10 9 total cells per infusion), administered as a single infusion after standard preconditioning chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m²/day and fludarabine 30 mg/m²/day, daily for 3 days) according to a classic 3+3 design. As of July 2021, 11 patients have been treated with CYAD-02 at the different dose-levels (3 at each DL1 and 2 and 5 at DL3). In terms of safety and tolerability, there was no evidence of a differential safety profile of CYAD-02 within the CYCLE-1 trial as compared to that observed in the CYAD-01 clinical trial. Of note, five patients enrolled in all 3 DLs experienced Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AE) at least possibly related to CYAD-02 (cytokine release syndrome, febrile neutropenia, white blood cell count decreased, infusion related reaction). With respect to clinical activity, seven patients in total achieved stable disease (2 at DL1, 3 at DL2 and 2 at DL3) with 4 demonstrating evidence of transient blast reduction or anti-leukemic activity (decrease of at least 50% of the bone marrow blasts). In addition, two MDS patients at DL3 achieved a marrow complete response. Overall, this suggests dose dependent response to CYAD-02. Furthermore, patients receiving CYAD-02 cells seem to display a greater duration of response and stronger blast reduction as compared to patients who received CYAD-01 in DEPLETHINK. Interestingly, peak engraftment levels were higher for CYAD-02 compared to CYAD-01 at the same dose (DEPLETHINK trial). At DL3, CYAD-02 cells could be readily detected in peripheral blood of 4/5 patients through month 2. In addition, and unlike what is reported in B cell CAR T-cells trials, there was very limited evidence of elevated homeostatic cytokines (IL-7/IL-15) following CyFlu administration with IL-15 not detected in any of the patients and IL-7 showing only a minor increase in 2 patients. The knockdown of MICA/MICB appears to have a positive contribution to the initial clinical activity of CYAD-02 as compared to that achieved with the first generation CYAD-01 CAR T, together with good safety and tolerability. The lack of homeostatic cytokines after preconditioning, likely limiting the engraftment and activity of CAR T cells, may be related to the biology of myeloid malignancies. One approach to further drive the potency of NKG2D-based CAR T cells would likely be armoring the CAR T through using the T cell as a vehicle to secrete cytokines alongside the CAR. Overall, shRNA knockdown technology provides a means to modify CAR T function and here shows that single shRNA can target two independent genes to enhance the phenotype of the CAR Ts. Disclosures Deeren: Alexion: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Lin: AbbVie, Aptevo Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Bio-Path Holdings, Celgene, Celyad, Genentech-Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Prescient Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Tolero, Trovagene: Research Funding. Alcantar-Orozco: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Dheur: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Breman: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Braun: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Lonez: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Gilham: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Flament: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Lehmann: Celyad Oncology: Current Employment.

Background Autologous CAR T-cell therapy targeting the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has shown impressive objective response rates in patients with advanced multiple myeloma (MM). Clinical grade manufacturing of autologous CAR T-cells has limitations including vein-to-vein delivery time delay and potentially sub-optimal immunological capability of T-cells isolated from patients with advanced disease. Allogeneic CAR T-cell products, whereby cells from healthy third-party donors are used to generate an "off-the-shelf" CAR T-cell product, have the potential to overcome some of these issues. To circumvent the primary potential risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) associated with the use of allogeneic T-cells, abrogation of the T-cell receptor (TCR) expression in the CAR T-cells, via gene editing, is being actively pursued. To avoid the potential safety risks and manufacturing challenges associated with gene editing, the allogeneic CYAD-211 CAR T-cell product exploits short hairpin RNA (shRNA) interference technology to down-regulate TCR expression thus avoiding the risk of life-threatening GvHD. Aim The aim is to generate a BCMA-specific allogeneic CAR T-cell product using a non-gene editing approach and study its activity both in vitro and in vivo. CYAD-211 combines a BCMA-specific CAR with a single optimized shRNA targeting the TCR CD3ζ subunit. Downregulation of CD3ζ impairs the TCR expression on the surface of the donor T-cells, preventing their reactivity with the normal host tissue cells and potential GvHD induction. Maintaining all the elements required for the therapy within a single vector (all-in-one vector) provides some significant manufacturing advantages, as a solitary selection step will isolate cells expressing all the desired traits. Results CYAD-211 cells produce high amounts of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) during in vitro co-cultures with various BCMA-expressing MM cell lines (i.e., RPMI-8226, OPM-2, U266, and KMS-11). Cytotoxicity experiments confirmed that CYAD-211 efficiently kills MM cell lines in a BCMA-specific manner. The anti-tumor efficacy of CYAD-211 was further confirmed in vivo, in xenograft MM models using the RPMI-8226 and KMS-11 cell lines. Preclinical data also showed no demonstrable evidence of GvHD when CYAD-211 was infused in NSG mice confirming efficient inhibition of TCR-induced activation. Following FDA acceptance of the IND application, IMMUNICY-1, a first-in-human, open-label dose-escalation phase I clinical study evaluating the safety and clinical activity of CYAD-211 for the treatment of relapsed or refractory MM patients to at least two prior MM treatment regimens, is scheduled to begin recruitment. IMMUNICY-1 will evaluate three dose-levels of CYAD-211 (3x107, 1x108 and 3x108 cells/infusion) administered as a single infusion after a non-myeloablative conditioning (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m²/day and fludarabine 30 mg/m²/day, daily for 3 days) according to a classical Fibonacci 3+3 design. Description of the study design and preliminary safety and clinical data from the first cohort will be presented at ASH 2020. Conclusion CYAD-211 is the first generation of non-gene edited allogeneic CAR T-cell product based on shRNA technology. The IMMUNICY-1 clinical study seeks to provide proof of principle that single shRNA-mediated knockdown can generate fully functional allogeneic CAR T-cells in humans without GvHD-inducing potential. We anticipate that subsequent generations of this technology will incorporate multiple shRNA hairpins within a single vector system. This will enable the production of allogeneic CAR T-cells in which multiple genes of interest are modulated simultaneously thereby providing a platform approach that can underpin the future of this therapeutic modality. Figure 1 Disclosures Al-Homsi: Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brayer:Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb, WindMIL Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Nishihori:Novartis: Other: Research support to institution; Karyopharm: Other: Research support to institution. Sotiropoulou:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Twyffels:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Bolsee:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Braun:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Lonez:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Gilham:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Flament:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Lehmann:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment.

The WAA apheresis registry was established in 2003 and an increasing number of centers have since then included their experience and data of their procedures. The registry now contains data of more than 74,000 apheresis procedures in more than 10,000 patients. This report shows that the indications for apheresis procedures are changing towards more oncological diagnoses and stem cell collections from patients and donors and less therapeutic apheresis procedures. In centers that continue to register, the total extent of apheresis procedures and patients treated have expanded during the latest years.

While performance since the introduction of the JACIE quality management system has been shown to be improved for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT), impact on autologous-HSCT remains unclear in Europe. Our study on 2697 autologous-HSCT performed in adults in 17 Belgian centres (2007-2013) aims at comparing the adjusted 1 and 3-yr survival between the different centres & investigating the impact of 3 centre-related factors on performance (time between JACIE accreditation achievement by the centre and the considered transplant, centre activity volume and type of HSCT performed by centres: exclusively autologous vs both autologous & allogeneic). We showed a relatively homogeneous performance between Belgian centres before national completeness of JACIE implementation. The 3 centre-related factors had a significant impact on the 1-yr survival, while activity volume and type of HSCT impacted the 3-yr survival of autologous-HSCT patients in univariable analyses. Only activity volume (impact on 1-yr survival only) and type of HSCT (impact on 1 and 3-yr survivals) remained significant in multivariable analysis. This is explained by the strong relationship between these 3 variables. An extended transplantation experience, i.e. performing both auto & allo-HSCT, appears to be a newly informative quality indicator potentially conveying a multitude of underlying complex factors., info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) is prescribed to patients that suffer from a severe progressive disease that is not sufficiently treated by conventional medications. A way to gain more knowledge about this treatment is usually by the local analysis of data. However, the use of large quality assessment registries enables analyses of even rare findings. Here, we report some of the recent data from the World Apheresis Association (WAA) registry. Data from >104,000 procedures were documented, and TA was performed on >15,000 patients. The main indication for TA was the collection of autologous stem cells (45% of patients) as part of therapy for therapy. Collection of stem cells from donors for allogeneic transplantation was performed in 11% of patients. Patients with indications such as neurological diseases underwent plasma exchange (28%). Extracorporeal photochemotherapy, lipid apheresis, and antibody removal were other indications. Side effects recorded in the registry have decreased significantly over the years, with approximately only 10/10,000 procedures being interrupted for medical reasons. Conclusion: Collection of data from TA procedures within a multinational and multicenter concept facilitates the improvement of treatment by enabling the analysis of and feedback on indications, procedures, effects, and side effects.

We report on an elderly patient with primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system. Despite dose reduction of methotrexate (MTX), he developed acute renal failure with creatinine increase to 3.3 mg/dl and stomatitis grade 3. CT scan 16 days after chemotherapy showed complete remission. Because of the very poor tolerance of therapy and the complete response we decided to follow-up carefully but not put him through further treatment after this single administration of MTX. Now, 7 years later, he is still in complete remission and enjoys a great life quality, living with his family. Like a patient in a House episode, he suffered from serious complications of chemo, but this one chemo course saved his life. Renal failure may have caused longer circulation of MTX and extended antineoplastic activity as well as toxicity. This challenges the classic view that therapy dose should be reduced in elderly patients. Outcome may be good despite age or toxicity. Core tip: We challenge the classic view that therapy dose should be reduced in elderly patients. Outcome may be good despite age or toxicity.

Objective : The World Apheresis Association (WAA) register contains data from more than 89 000 apheresis procedures in more than 12,000 patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate functional health and quality of life (QoL) in patients during apheresis treatment. Material and methods : Estimates of health condition (HC) were made in 40,445 and of QoL in 22112 apheresis procedures. This study focused on a 10-step graded evaluation of HC (scale from: ‘bedridden, unable to eat’ to a level of ‘athletic competition’) and self-assessment of QoL (scale from: worst ever ‘0’ to best ever ‘10’). Data were compared in relation to various apheresis procedures and if the patient underwent the first or subsequent apheresis procedure. Results : Of the patients treated with plasma exchange (PEX) with centrifugation technique (n = 15787) 10% were ‘bedridden, unable to come out of bed’ while for patients treated with plasma filtration technique (n = 1018) the percentage was 27%. During the first procedure these figures were 16% and 30%, respectively. Self-estimates of QoL were graded ‘zero’ or ‘1’ in 1.6% of patients during the first apheresis procedure; At the first contact patients undergoing PEX graded like this in 4.3%. Conclusion : Many of the patients undergoing apheresis treatment have poor HC and QoL at the start of therapy. Of all therapeutic apheresis procedures patients undergoing PEX had the lowest score of QoL.

Brachial plexus neuropathy is a rare, but underdiagnosed condition, characterized by intense analgesic-resistant shoulder pain, followed by brachial plexus paresis and sensory symptoms. We present a case of brachial plexus neuropathy, induced by Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) 17 days after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. The diagnosis was made based on the clinical presentation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brachial plexus, and positive T. gondii polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in cerebrospinal fluid. The patient was treated with pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and levofolinic acid during 6 weeks, with a positive outcome.

Lenalidomide maintenance therapy prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) responding to induction chemotherapy in the phase 3 REMARC study. This subpopulation analysis assessed the impact of lenalidomide maintenance and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Global health status (GHS), and physical functioning and fatigue subscales were evaluated in patients who completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire-C30 v3.0. The impact of TEAEs classified post hoc as subjective (patients can feel) or observable (only measurable by physicians) on dose reductions and discontinuations was assessed. Among 457 patients (lenalidomide, n = 229; placebo, n = 228), mean (standard deviation) GHS was similar between treatment arms [68·2 (20·7) Versus 72·0 (17·8)] at randomisation and remained similar during maintenance. Patients receiving lenalidomide experienced no meaningful changes in GHS, physical functioning, or fatigue. Observable TEAEs were more common (81·1% Versus 66·3%) and more likely to lead to dose reductions, than subjective TEAEs in both arms. PFS was superior in the lenalidomide arm regardless of dose reduction. Lenalidomide maintenance prolonged PFS and did not negatively impact HRQOL in patients with DLBCL despite TEAEs being more common, when compared with placebo., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has been established as a powerful treatment modality for patients with hematological malignancies. The graft-versus-leukemia effect, however, is strongly associated with the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and subsequent transplant-related mortality (TRM). Several strategies are applied in order to prevent GVHD following T-cell replete alloHSCT including conventional immunosuppression (CIS) with post-transplant administration of cyclosporine A (CyA) and mycophenolic acid (MA), or post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) either or not combined with CIS. Studies in haplo- and HLA matched donor transplantation have shown that PT-Cy is well tolerated and associated with low rates of severe GVHD and TRM. However, evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy of PT-Cy as compared to CIS in the setting of HLA matched alloHSCT is scarce. Aims In the present prospective randomized, multicenter, phase III trial we set out to compare a PT-Cy based immunosuppressive regimen with CIS and address the question whether PT-Cy would be associated with improved GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Endpoints included time to acute and chronic GVHD, progression free survival (PFS), GRFS, overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Methods Hematological patients (pts) with a matched related donor or at least an 8 out of 8 matched unrelated donor were included. Pts randomized for the CIS regimen received CyA twice daily until day +120 followed by tapering until day +180 and MA 16 mg/kg twice daily with a maximum dose of 2160 mg a day until day 84 post-transplant. Pts randomized for PT-Cy received 50 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide on day +3 and +4 combined with CyA from day +5 until day +70. Results A total of 160 pts was randomized 1:2 between CIS and PT-Cy, of whom 94% proceeded to transplant (52 versus 99 pts). Median age was 58 years (range: 20-70), 66% were male. Two pts received myeloablative conditioning. The donor type was matched related in 31% and matched unrelated in 69% of pts. Transplants were derived from peripheral blood in 97% of pts and consisted of median 6.14x106/kg CD34+ cells/kg (range: 1.36-19.4) and median 230x106/kg CD3+ T cells (range: 0-519). Baseline patient and transplantation characteristics were equally distributed between the two treatment arms. The cumulative incidence (CI) at six months of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 48% in recipients of CIS versus 32% following PT-Cy (SHR 0.52, 95%CI 0.31-0.87, p=0.014), and grade III-IV 12% versus 6%. In recipients of PT-Cy, acute GVHD was generally limited to stage 1 skin involvement, whereas more severe skin involvement and bowel involvement were observed following CIS. The two-year CI of chronic extensive GVHD was 50% in recipients of CIS versus 19% following PT-Cy (SHR 0.38, 95%CI 0.21-0.67, p=0.001). The three-year estimate of PFS was 60% (44%-73%) and 58% (46%-67%). The three-year CI of progression/relapse was 26% in the CIS arm versus 32% in the PT-Cy arm. The three-year estimate of OS was 69% (53%-80%) and 63% (52%-73%). The one-year estimate (95% confidence interval) of GRFS was 22% (12%-34%) and 45% (35%-55%), respectively. Conclusion Use of high-dose PT-Cy results in a significant reduction in severe acute and chronic GVHD without affecting relapse, thereby resulting in improved GRFS. Hence, a more intensified immunosuppression regimen with PT-Cy might be preferred as GVHD prophylaxis in the setting of RIC alloHSCT. Figure Disclosures Nur: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Maertens:Cidara: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; Gilead Sciences: Other: Grants, personal fees and non-financial support; Amplyx: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; Merck: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; Pfizer: Other: Grant and personal fees; Astellas Pharma: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; F2G: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support. Deeren:Alexion, Amgen, Janssen, Roche, Sunesis, Takeda, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Background T-cells engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) based on the NKG2D receptor (NKG2D CAR) targeting the 8 NKG2D ligands (MICA/B, ULBP1-6) over-expressed by a large variety of malignancies have been developped to treat patients, including patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Previously, CYAD-01, the first generation of NKG2D CAR T-cell products, was evaluated in several Phase I clinical trials and showed initial signals of objective clinical responses in patients with r/r AML and MDS, albeit with short durability. Preclinical data have shown that NKG2D ligands MICA and MICB are transiently upregulated on activated CAR T-cells, and target-dependent killing of CAR T-cells post-infusion can potentially occur, leading to short in vivo persistence. In an effort to increase the persistence and potency of the NKG2D CAR T-cells, CYAD-02 was developed as a next-generation product using a non-gene editing approach to silence the expression of MICA and MICB. Aim MICA and MICB were down-regulated by inserting a single optimized short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting both MICA and MICB within the NKG2D CAR construct. This next-generation NKG2D CAR T-cell product is manufactured with the OptimAb process, resulting in CAR T-cells with a higher frequency of early memory T-cells secreting high levels of cytokines upon activation, and is referred to as CYAD-02. Results As compared to CYAD-01, CYAD-02 cell expansion in vitro was 3-fold increased. In an in vivo AML model, CYAD-02 showed 10-fold higher engraftment 1 week after injection and improved anti-tumor activity as compared to CYAD-01 manufactured with the initial mAb process. This led to a 2.6-fold increase of mouse survival as compared to CYAD-01 in a stress-test aggressive AML model where the dose of CYAD-01 was titrated down for minimal activity (figure). The first-in-human study evaluating CYAD-02, the CYCLE-1 study (NCT04167696), has been initiated in early 2020 in patients with r/r AML/MDS. The study evaluates three dose-levels of CYAD-02 (1x108, 3x108 and 1x109 cells/infusion), administered as a single infusion after non-myeloablative preconditioning chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m²/day and fludarabine 30 mg/m²/day, daily for 3 days, CyFlu) according to a classical Fibonacci 3+3 design. As of August 2020, 6 patients have been treated with CYAD-02 at the dose of 1x108 or 3x108 cells/infusion. To date, the results demonstrate the safety and tolerability for CYAD-02 in patients with r/r AML and MDS with no dose-limiting toxicity observed. The study is currently enrolling at 1x109 cells/infusion. The CYAD-02 safety profile and preliminary clinical activity data together with the pharmacokinetics evaluation from the complete dose escalation segment will be provided at the time of presentation. Conclusion/summary The CYAD-02 is the first autologous CAR T-cell product based on the non-gene edited shRNA technology used to treat patients. This next generation NKG2D CAR T-cell product is currently investigated in the CYCLE-1 Phase I study in r/r AML/MDS patient population, a difficult to target disease due in part to the absence of truly AML-specific surface antigens, its rapid clinical progression and the absence of disease control by the CyFlu preconditioning. Both the anti-MICA and MICB shRNA hairpin and the OptimAb manufacturing process for CYAD-02 aim to improve CAR T-cell persistence and clinical responses. Figure Disclosures Lin: Mateon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celyad: Research Funding; Genetech-Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Prescient Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Demoulin:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Fontaine:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Sotiropoulou:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Alcantar-Orozco:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Breman:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Dheur:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Braun:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Lonez:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Gilham:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Flament:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment. Lehmann:Celyad Oncology: Current Employment.

A recent multicenter study demonstrated that bathing with chlorhexidine reduces the transmission of resistant organisms and the risk of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in ICUs. We wanted to confirm the feasibility of this strategy in a cohort of patients in a typical intensive haematology unit.Patients treated with remission induction chemotherapy, autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation received daily chlorhexidine bathing. To avoid deshydratation of skin, we used prophylactic application of hydrating lotion, replaced by corticosteroid cream in case of skin toxicity of chemotherapy or conditioning.We studied 15 consecutive admissions of 12 patients. Daily chlorhexidine bathing never needed to be interrupted, even though 53% of patients were treated with intravenous cytarabine. Patients were satisfied with the skin treatment and reported few unwanted effects.Daily chlorhexidine bathing was feasible in our intensive haematology unit in all patients and did not increase skin toxicity, even when treated with IV cytarabine.

The lives of recipients of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) depend upon the availability of PBPC. Rupture of stem cell bags does occur and can have devastating consequences. Each transplant center should agree on a rescue procedure and train its personnel to use it. We provide an example of such a procedure, and its update after the procedure was used for the first time.