Search

Abstract: Introduction: The high‐throughput era remarkably changed molecular laboratory practice. Actually, the increasing number of processed samples requires to reduce the risk of operator biases, by automating or simplifying as much as possible both the analytical and the pre‐analytical phases. Minimal residual disease (MRD) studies in hematology often require a simultaneous processing of many bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from patients enrolled in prospective, multicenter, clinical trials, monitored at several planned time points. Methods: In this study, we demonstrate that red blood cell lysis (RBL) pre‐analytical procedure can replace the time‐consuming Ficoll stratification as cell recovering step. Here, we show a MRD comparison study using both total white blood cells and mononuclear cells recovered by the 2 procedures from 46 follicular lymphoma (FL), 15 multiple myeloma (MM), and 11 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients enrolled in prospective clinical trials. Results: The experiments were performed in the 4 laboratories of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) MRD Network and showed superimposable results, in terms of good correlation (R = 0.87) of the MRD data obtained by recovering blood cells by the 2 approaches. Conclusion: Based on these results, the FIL MRD Network suggests to optimize the pre‐analytical phases introducing RBL approach for cell recovery in the clinical trials including MRD analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The mainstay of treatment for early-stage follicular lymphoma is local radiotherapy, with a possible role for anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb). We aimed to evaluate the effect of these treatments using a measurable residual disease (MRD)-driven approach., Methods: This prospective, multicentre, phase 2 trial was conducted at 27 centres of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) in Italy. Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed follicular lymphoma (stage I or II; grade I-IIIa). Patients were initially treated with 24 Gy involved-field radiotherapy over 12 days; those who were MRD-positive after radiotherapy or during follow-up received eight intravenous doses (1000 mg per dose; one dose per week) of the anti-CD20 mAb ofatumumab. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were MRD-positive after involved-field radiotherapy and became MRD-negative after ofatumumab treatment. Patients were included in the primary endpoint analysis population if they were positive for BCL2::IGH rearrangement at enrolment in peripheral blood or bone marrow samples. MRD positivity was defined as the persistence of BCL2::IGH rearrangement in peripheral blood or bone marrow, assessed centrally by laboratories of the FIL MRD Network. The trial was registered with EudraCT, 2012-001676-11., Findings: Between May 2, 2015, and June 1, 2018, we enrolled 110 participants, of whom 106 (96%) were eligible and received involved-field radiotherapy. Of these, 105 (99%) were White, one (1%) was Black, 50 (47%) were male, and 56 (53%) were female. Of 105 participants in whom BCL2::IGH status was evaluable, 32 (30%) had a detectable BCL2::IGH rearrangement at baseline. After radiotherapy, 12 (40%) of 30 patients reached MRD-negative status, which was long-lasting (at least 36 or 42 months) in three (25%). In those who were MRD-positive after radiotherapy, ofatumumab induced MRD-negativity in 23 (92%; 95% CI 74-99) of 25 evaluable patients. After a median follow-up of 46·1 months (IQR 42·8-50·8), 14 (61%) of these 23 patients remain in complete response and are MRD-negative. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were infusion-related reactions, observed in four patients., Interpretation: Local radiotherapy is frequently not associated with the eradication of follicular lymphoma. An MRD-driven, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody consolidation enables molecular remission to be reached in almost all patients and is associated with a reduced incidence of relapse over time. A clinical advantage of an MRD-driven consolidation is therefore suggested., Funding: AIRC Foundation for Cancer Research in Italy, Novartis International, and GlaxoSmithKline., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AP reports support for the study from Novartis and AIRC 5 × 1000; payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and BeiGene; payment for expert testimony from Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Roche; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene, Pfizer, and AbbVie; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. SL reports payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from Roche, BeiGene, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Kite Pharma; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche and BeiGene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Roche, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Sobi, and Incyte. GG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Incyte, Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson and payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Incyte, Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, and Hikma Pharmaceuticals. PC received consulting fees from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Amgen, BeiGene, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals and payment for lectures from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharma, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. LA received consulting fees from Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Verastem Oncology, Incyte, EUSA Pharma, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite/Gilead, ADC Therapeutics, and Novartis and payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from EUSA Pharma and Novartis. ML received grants or contracts from Roche, BeiGene, ADC Therapeutics, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals and consulting fees and/or payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, ADC Therapeutics, Sobi, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, Gilead/Kite, Novartis, Incyte, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharma, Lilly, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Ellipses Pharma, GSK, and Istituto Gentili. IDG received payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche, and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche, and AstraZeneca; and support for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Roche. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) diagnostics using real-time quantitative PCR analysis of rearranged immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements are nowadays implemented in most treatment protocols for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Within the EuroMRD Consortium, we aim to provide comparable, high-quality MRD diagnostics, allowing appropriate risk-group classification for patients and inter-protocol comparisons. To this end, we set up a quality assessment scheme, that was gradually optimized and updated over the last 20 years, and that now includes participants from around 70 laboratories worldwide. We here describe the design and analysis of our quality assessment scheme. In addition, we here report revised data interpretation guidelines, based on our newly generated data and extensive discussions between experts. The main novelty is the partial re-definition of the "positive below quantitative range" category by two new categories, "MRD low positive, below quantitative range" and "MRD of uncertain significance". The quality assessment program and revised guidelines will ensure reproducible and accurate MRD data for ALL patients. Within the Consortium, similar programs and guidelines have been introduced for other lymphoid diseases (e.g., B-cell lymphoma), for new technological platforms (e.g., digital droplet PCR or Next-Generation Sequencing), and for other patient-specific MRD PCR-based targets (e.g., fusion genes)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The diagnosis of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), an IgM-associated lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, can be challenging due to the different forms of disease presentation. Furthermore, in recent years, WM has witnessed remarkable progress on the diagnostic front, as well as a deeper understanding of the disease biology, which has affected clinical practice. This, together with the increasing variety of tools and techniques available, makes it necessary to have a practical guidance for clinicians to perform the initial evaluation of patients with WM. In this paper, we present the consensus recommendations and laboratory requirements for the diagnosis of WM developed by the European Consortium of Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (ECWM), for both clinical practice as well as the research/academical setting. We provide the procedures for multiparametric flow cytometry, fluorescence in situ hybridization and molecular tests, and with this offer guidance for a standardized diagnostic work-up and methodological workflow of patients with IgM monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance, asymptomatic and symptomatic WM., (© 2022. The Author(s).)