Search

Your search keyword '"Dozier M"' showing total 280 results
Start Over Author "Dozier M"
280 results on '"Dozier M"'

1. Real-World Patient Experience of Switching Biologic Treatment in Inflammatory Arthritis and Ulcerative Colitis – A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Luttropp K, Dalén J, Svedbom A, Dozier M, Black CM, and Puenpatom A

Subjects
arthritis, colitis, ulcerative, biological products, patient reported outcome measures, treatment switch, Medicine (General), R5-920
Abstract

Karin Luttropp, 1 Johan Dalén, 1 Axel Svedbom, 1 Mary Dozier, 2 Christopher M Black, 3 Amy Puenpatom 3 1ICON Clinical Research, Plc., Stockholm, Sweden; 2ICON Clinical Research, Plc., Boston, MA, USA; 3Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USACorrespondence: Amy PuenpatomCenter of Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ Tel +1 267 305 0620Fax +1 215 850 4549Email puenpatom.amy@merck.comPurpose: To obtain an up-to-date overview of the measurement of patient experience of switching biologic treatment in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) or ulcerative colitis (UC). Secondary objectives included summarizing the types of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used (if any), and related findings; and summarizing medical and non-medical reasons for treatment switch and/or discontinuation.Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed, searching Medline and Embase for relevant publications.Results: In total, 70 relevant publications were identified. While the majority of these reported reasons for switching and/or discontinuing treatment, only four provided information explicitly regarding patient-reported experience of switching biologic treatment. All four utilized ranking tools to assess patient experience of switching biologic treatment. The most common reason for switching and/or discontinuing treatment was loss of efficacy, while the least common reason was patient preference.Conclusion: Although the number of available treatments in IA and UC have increased, there is a sparsity of information regarding patient-reported experience of switching biologic treatment. Further research regarding patient preference and/or experience would benefit this therapeutic area and help guide treatment choices.Keywords: arthritis, colitis, ulcerative, biological products, patient reported outcome measures, treatment switch

Published
2020

4. The latent structure of the adult attachment interview: Large sample evidence from the collaboration on attachment transmission synthesis

Author

Lee Raby, K, Verhage, M, Pasco Fearon, R, Chris Fraley, R, Roisman, G, van IJzendoorn, M, Schuengel, C, Madigan, S, Oosterman, M, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M, Bernier, A, Ensink, K, Hautamaki, A, Mangelsdorf, S, Priddis, L, Wong, M, Aviezer, O, Behrens, K, Brisch, K, Cassibba, R, Cassidy, J, Coppola, G, Costantini, A, Dozier, M, Duschinsky, R, Ierardi, E, Finger, B, de Millan, S, Harder, S, Hazen, N, Jin, M, Myung, S, Jongenelen, I, Leerkes, E, Lionetti, F, Lyons-Ruth, K, Mcmahon, C, Meins, E, Pace, C, Pederson, D, Riva Crugnola, C, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Schoppe-Sullivan, S, Speranza, A, Steele, H, Tarabulsy, G, Vaever, M, Ward, M, Arnott, B, Bailey, H, Behringer, J, Brice, P, Castoro, G, Costantino, E, Cyr, C, George, C, Gloger-Tippelt, G, Howes, C, Jacobsen, H, Jacobvitz, D, Juffer, F, Kazui, M, Koppe, S, Millan, S, Murray, L, Simonelli, A, Solomon, J, Steele, M, Teti, D, Monique van Londen-Barentsen, W, Lee Raby K., Verhage M. L., Pasco Fearon R. M., Chris Fraley R., Roisman G. I., van IJzendoorn M. H., Schuengel C., Madigan S., Oosterman M., Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J., Bernier A., Ensink K., Hautamaki A., Mangelsdorf S., Priddis L. E., Wong M. S., Aviezer O., Behrens K. Y., Brisch K. -H., Cassibba R., Cassidy J., Coppola G., Costantini A., Dozier M., Duschinsky R., Ierardi E., Finger B., de Millan S. G., Harder S., Hazen N. L., Jin M. M., Myung S., Jongenelen I., Leerkes E. M., Lionetti F., Lyons-Ruth K., McMahon C., Meins E., Pace C. S., Pederson D. R., Riva Crugnola C., Sagi-Schwartz A., Schoppe-Sullivan S. J., Speranza A. M., Steele H., Tarabulsy G. M., Vaever M. S., Ward M. J., Arnott B., Bailey H., Behringer J., Brice P. J., Castoro G., Costantino E., Cyr C., George C., Gloger-Tippelt G., Howes C., Jacobsen H., Jacobvitz D., Juffer F., Kazui M., Koppe S., Millan S., Murray L., Simonelli A., Solomon J., Steele M., Teti D. M., Monique van Londen-Barentsen W., Lee Raby, K, Verhage, M, Pasco Fearon, R, Chris Fraley, R, Roisman, G, van IJzendoorn, M, Schuengel, C, Madigan, S, Oosterman, M, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M, Bernier, A, Ensink, K, Hautamaki, A, Mangelsdorf, S, Priddis, L, Wong, M, Aviezer, O, Behrens, K, Brisch, K, Cassibba, R, Cassidy, J, Coppola, G, Costantini, A, Dozier, M, Duschinsky, R, Ierardi, E, Finger, B, de Millan, S, Harder, S, Hazen, N, Jin, M, Myung, S, Jongenelen, I, Leerkes, E, Lionetti, F, Lyons-Ruth, K, Mcmahon, C, Meins, E, Pace, C, Pederson, D, Riva Crugnola, C, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Schoppe-Sullivan, S, Speranza, A, Steele, H, Tarabulsy, G, Vaever, M, Ward, M, Arnott, B, Bailey, H, Behringer, J, Brice, P, Castoro, G, Costantino, E, Cyr, C, George, C, Gloger-Tippelt, G, Howes, C, Jacobsen, H, Jacobvitz, D, Juffer, F, Kazui, M, Koppe, S, Millan, S, Murray, L, Simonelli, A, Solomon, J, Steele, M, Teti, D, Monique van Londen-Barentsen, W, Lee Raby K., Verhage M. L., Pasco Fearon R. M., Chris Fraley R., Roisman G. I., van IJzendoorn M. H., Schuengel C., Madigan S., Oosterman M., Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J., Bernier A., Ensink K., Hautamaki A., Mangelsdorf S., Priddis L. E., Wong M. S., Aviezer O., Behrens K. Y., Brisch K. -H., Cassibba R., Cassidy J., Coppola G., Costantini A., Dozier M., Duschinsky R., Ierardi E., Finger B., de Millan S. G., Harder S., Hazen N. L., Jin M. M., Myung S., Jongenelen I., Leerkes E. M., Lionetti F., Lyons-Ruth K., McMahon C., Meins E., Pace C. S., Pederson D. R., Riva Crugnola C., Sagi-Schwartz A., Schoppe-Sullivan S. J., Speranza A. M., Steele H., Tarabulsy G. M., Vaever M. S., Ward M. J., Arnott B., Bailey H., Behringer J., Brice P. J., Castoro G., Costantino E., Cyr C., George C., Gloger-Tippelt G., Howes C., Jacobsen H., Jacobvitz D., Juffer F., Kazui M., Koppe S., Millan S., Murray L., Simonelli A., Solomon J., Steele M., Teti D. M., and Monique van Londen-Barentsen W.

Abstract

The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) is a widely used measure in developmental science that assesses adults' current states of mind regarding early attachment-related experiences with their primary caregivers. The standard system for coding the AAI recommends classifying individuals categorically as having an autonomous, dismissing, preoccupied, or unresolved attachment state of mind. However, previous factor and taxometric analyses suggest that: (a) adults' attachment states of mind are captured by two weakly correlated factors reflecting adults' dismissing and preoccupied states of mind and (b) individual differences on these factors are continuously rather than categorically distributed. The current study revisited these suggestions about the latent structure of AAI scales by leveraging individual participant data from 40 studies (N = 3,218), with a particular focus on the controversial observation from prior factor analytic work that indicators of preoccupied states of mind and indicators of unresolved states of mind about loss and trauma loaded on a common factor. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that: (a) a 2-factor model with weakly correlated dismissing and preoccupied factors and (b) a 3-factor model that further distinguished unresolved from preoccupied states of mind were both compatible with the data. The preoccupied and unresolved factors in the 3-factor model were highly correlated. Taxometric analyses suggested that individual differences in dismissing, preoccupied, and unresolved states of mind were more consistent with a continuous than a categorical model. The importance of additional tests of predictive validity of the various models is emphasized.

Published
2022

5. Conceptual comparison of constructs as first step in data harmonization: Parental sensitivity, child temperament, and social support as illustrations

Author

Verhage, M, Schuengel, C, Holopainen, A, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M, Bernier, A, Brown, G, Madigan, S, Roisman, G, Vaever, M, Wong, M, Barone, L, Behrens, K, Behringer, J, Bovenschen, I, Cassibba, R, Cassidy, J, Coppola, G, Costantini, A, Dozier, M, Ensink, K, Fearon, R, Finger, B, Hautamaki, A, Hazen, N, Ierardi, E, Jongenelen, I, Koppe, S, Lionetti, F, Mangelsdorf, S, Oosterman, M, Pace, C, Raby, K, Riva Crugnola, C, Simonelli, A, Spangler, G, Tarabulsy, G, Arnott, B, Bailey, H, Brice, P, Brisch, K, Castoro, G, Costantino, E, Cyr, C, George, C, Gloger-Tippelt, G, Gojman, S, Harder, S, Howes, C, Jacobsen, H, Jacobvitz, D, Jin, M, Juffer, F, Kazui, M, Leerkes, E, Lyons-Ruth, K, Mcmahon, C, Meins, E, Millan, S, Murray, L, Nowacki, K, Pederson, D, Priddis, L, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Schoppe-Sullivan, S, Solomon, J, Speranza, A, Steele, M, Steele, H, Teti, D, van IJzendoorn, M, van Londen-Barentsen, W, Ward, M, Verhage M. L., Schuengel C., Holopainen A., Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J., Bernier A., Brown G. L., Madigan S., Roisman G. I., Vaever M. S., Wong M. S., Barone L., Behrens K. Y., Behringer J., Bovenschen I., Cassibba R., Cassidy J., Coppola G., Costantini A., Dozier M., Ensink K., Fearon R. M. P., Finger B., Hautamaki A., Hazen N. L., Ierardi E., Jongenelen I., Koppe S., Lionetti F., Mangelsdorf S., Oosterman M., Pace C. S., Raby K. L., Riva Crugnola C., Simonelli A., Spangler G., Tarabulsy G. M., Arnott B., Bailey H., Brice P. J., Brisch K. -H., Castoro G., Costantino E., Cyr C., George C., Gloger-Tippelt G., Gojman S., Harder S., Howes C., Jacobsen H., Jacobvitz D., Jin M. K., Juffer F., Kazui M., Leerkes E. M., Lyons-Ruth K., McMahon C., Meins E., Millan S., Murray L., Nowacki K., Pederson D. R., Priddis L., Sagi-Schwartz A., Schoppe-Sullivan S. J., Solomon J., Speranza A. M., Steele M., Steele H., Teti D. M., van IJzendoorn M. H., van Londen-Barentsen W. M., Ward M. J., Verhage, M, Schuengel, C, Holopainen, A, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M, Bernier, A, Brown, G, Madigan, S, Roisman, G, Vaever, M, Wong, M, Barone, L, Behrens, K, Behringer, J, Bovenschen, I, Cassibba, R, Cassidy, J, Coppola, G, Costantini, A, Dozier, M, Ensink, K, Fearon, R, Finger, B, Hautamaki, A, Hazen, N, Ierardi, E, Jongenelen, I, Koppe, S, Lionetti, F, Mangelsdorf, S, Oosterman, M, Pace, C, Raby, K, Riva Crugnola, C, Simonelli, A, Spangler, G, Tarabulsy, G, Arnott, B, Bailey, H, Brice, P, Brisch, K, Castoro, G, Costantino, E, Cyr, C, George, C, Gloger-Tippelt, G, Gojman, S, Harder, S, Howes, C, Jacobsen, H, Jacobvitz, D, Jin, M, Juffer, F, Kazui, M, Leerkes, E, Lyons-Ruth, K, Mcmahon, C, Meins, E, Millan, S, Murray, L, Nowacki, K, Pederson, D, Priddis, L, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Schoppe-Sullivan, S, Solomon, J, Speranza, A, Steele, M, Steele, H, Teti, D, van IJzendoorn, M, van Londen-Barentsen, W, Ward, M, Verhage M. L., Schuengel C., Holopainen A., Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J., Bernier A., Brown G. L., Madigan S., Roisman G. I., Vaever M. S., Wong M. S., Barone L., Behrens K. Y., Behringer J., Bovenschen I., Cassibba R., Cassidy J., Coppola G., Costantini A., Dozier M., Ensink K., Fearon R. M. P., Finger B., Hautamaki A., Hazen N. L., Ierardi E., Jongenelen I., Koppe S., Lionetti F., Mangelsdorf S., Oosterman M., Pace C. S., Raby K. L., Riva Crugnola C., Simonelli A., Spangler G., Tarabulsy G. M., Arnott B., Bailey H., Brice P. J., Brisch K. -H., Castoro G., Costantino E., Cyr C., George C., Gloger-Tippelt G., Gojman S., Harder S., Howes C., Jacobsen H., Jacobvitz D., Jin M. K., Juffer F., Kazui M., Leerkes E. M., Lyons-Ruth K., McMahon C., Meins E., Millan S., Murray L., Nowacki K., Pederson D. R., Priddis L., Sagi-Schwartz A., Schoppe-Sullivan S. J., Solomon J., Speranza A. M., Steele M., Steele H., Teti D. M., van IJzendoorn M. H., van Londen-Barentsen W. M., and Ward M. J.

Abstract

This article presents a strategy for the initial step of data harmonization in Individual Participant Data syntheses, i.e., making decisions as to which measures operationalize the constructs of interest - and which do not. This step is vital in the process of data harmonization, because a study can only be as good as its measures. If the construct validity of the measures is in question, study results are questionable as well. Our proposed strategy for data harmonization consists of three steps. First, a unitary construct is defined based on the existing literature, preferably on the theoretical framework surrounding the construct. Second, the various instruments used to measure the construct are evaluated as operationalizations of this construct, and retained or excluded based on this evaluation. Third, the scores of the included measures are recoded on the same metric. We illustrate the use of this method with three example constructs focal to the Collaboration on Attachment Transmission Synthesis (CATS) study: parental sensitivity, child temperament, and social support. This process description may aid researchers in their data pooling studies, filling a gap in the literature on the first step of data harmonization. • Data harmonization in studies using combined datasets is of vital importance for the validity of the study results. • We have developed and illustrated a strategy on how to define a unitary construct and evaluate whether instruments are operationalizations of this construct as the initial step in the harmonization process. • This strategy is a transferable and reproducible method to apply to the data harmonization process.

Published
2022

6. The latent structure of the adult attachment interview: Large sample evidence from the collaboration on attachment transmission synthesis

Author

Lee Raby K., Verhage M. L., Pasco Fearon R. M., Chris Fraley R., Roisman G. I., van IJzendoorn M. H., Schuengel C., Madigan S., Oosterman M., Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J., Bernier A., Ensink K., Hautamaki A., Mangelsdorf S., Priddis L. E., Wong M. S., Aviezer O., Behrens K. Y., Brisch K. -H., Cassibba R., Cassidy J., Coppola G., Costantini A., Dozier M., Duschinsky R., Ierardi E., Finger B., de Millan S. G., Harder S., Hazen N. L., Jin M. M., Myung S., Jongenelen I., Leerkes E. M., Lionetti F., Lyons-Ruth K., McMahon C., Meins E., Pace C. S., Pederson D. R., Riva Crugnola C., Sagi-Schwartz A., Schoppe-Sullivan S. J., Speranza A. M., Steele H., Tarabulsy G. M., Vaever M. S., Ward M. J., Arnott B., Bailey H., Behringer J., Brice P. J., Castoro G., Costantino E., Cyr C., George C., Gloger-Tippelt G., Howes C., Jacobsen H., Jacobvitz D., Juffer F., Kazui M., Koppe S., Millan S., Murray L., Simonelli A., Solomon J., Steele M., Teti D. M., Monique van Londen-Barentsen W., Lee Raby, K, Verhage, M, Pasco Fearon, R, Chris Fraley, R, Roisman, G, van IJzendoorn, M, Schuengel, C, Madigan, S, Oosterman, M, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M, Bernier, A, Ensink, K, Hautamaki, A, Mangelsdorf, S, Priddis, L, Wong, M, Aviezer, O, Behrens, K, Brisch, K, Cassibba, R, Cassidy, J, Coppola, G, Costantini, A, Dozier, M, Duschinsky, R, Ierardi, E, Finger, B, de Millan, S, Harder, S, Hazen, N, Jin, M, Myung, S, Jongenelen, I, Leerkes, E, Lionetti, F, Lyons-Ruth, K, Mcmahon, C, Meins, E, Pace, C, Pederson, D, Riva Crugnola, C, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Schoppe-Sullivan, S, Speranza, A, Steele, H, Tarabulsy, G, Vaever, M, Ward, M, Arnott, B, Bailey, H, Behringer, J, Brice, P, Castoro, G, Costantino, E, Cyr, C, George, C, Gloger-Tippelt, G, Howes, C, Jacobsen, H, Jacobvitz, D, Juffer, F, Kazui, M, Koppe, S, Millan, S, Murray, L, Simonelli, A, Solomon, J, Steele, M, Teti, D, and Monique van Londen-Barentsen, W

Subjects
Adult, Predictive validity, Individuality, 050109 social psychology, taxometric, Developmental Science, Developmental psychology, Interview, Psychological, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Categorical models, Humans, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, Latent structure, Individual participant data, 05 social sciences, 16. Peace & justice, Object Attachment, Large sample, Standard system, Psychiatry and Mental health, factor analysi, Psychology, latent structure, Attachment measures, Adult Attachment Interview, 050104 developmental & child psychology
Abstract

The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) is a widely used measure in developmental science that assesses adults’ current states of mind regarding early attachment-related experiences with their primary caregivers. The standard system for coding the AAI recommends classifying individuals categorically as having an autonomous, dismissing, preoccupied, or unresolved attachment state of mind. However, previous factor and taxometric analyses suggest that: (a) adults’ attachment states of mind are captured by two weakly correlated factors reflecting adults’ dismissing and preoccupied states of mind and (b) individual differences on these factors are continuously rather than categorically distributed. The current study revisited these suggestions about the latent structure of AAI scales by leveraging individual participant data from 40 studies (N = 3,218), with a particular focus on the controversial observation from prior factor analytic work that indicators of preoccupied states of mind and indicators of unresolved states of mind about loss and trauma loaded on a common factor. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that: (a) a 2-factor model with weakly correlated dismissing and preoccupied factors and (b) a 3-factor model that further distinguished unresolved from preoccupied states of mind were both compatible with the data. The preoccupied and unresolved factors in the 3-factor model were highly correlated. Taxometric analyses suggested that individual differences in dismissing, preoccupied, and unresolved states of mind were more consistent with a continuous than a categorical model. The importance of additional tests of predictive validity of the various models is emphasized.

Published
2020

7. Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues

Author

Forslund, T, Granqvist, P, van IJzendoorn, MH, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Glaser, D, Steele, M, Hammarlund, M, Schuengel, C, Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ, Steele, H, Shaver, PR, Lux, U, Simmonds, J, Jacobvitz, D, Groh, AM, Bernard, K, Cyr, C, Hazen, NL, Foster, S, Psouni, E, Cowan, PA, Cowan, CP, Rifkin-Graboi, A, Wilkins, D, Pierrehumbert, B, Tarabulsy, GM, Cárcamo, RA, Wang, Z, Liang, X, Kázmierczak, M, Pawlicka, P, Ayiro, L, Chansa, T, Sichimba, F, Mooya, H, McLean, L, Verissimo, M, Gojman-De-Millán, S, Moretti, MM, Bacro, F, Peltola, MJ, Galbally, M, Kondo-Ikemura, K, Behrens, KY, Scott, S, Rodriguez, AF, Spencer, R, Posada, G, Cassibba, R, Barrantes-Vidal, N, Palacios, J, Barone, L, Madigan, S, Mason-Jones, K, Reijman, S, Juffer, F, Fearon, RP, Bernier, A, Cicchetti, D, Roisman, GI, Cassidy, J, Kindler, H, Zimmerman, P, Feldman, R, Spangle, G, Zeanah, CH, Dozier, M, Belsky, J, Lamb, ME, Duschinsky, R, Forslund, T, Granqvist, P, van IJzendoorn, MH, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Glaser, D, Steele, M, Hammarlund, M, Schuengel, C, Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ, Steele, H, Shaver, PR, Lux, U, Simmonds, J, Jacobvitz, D, Groh, AM, Bernard, K, Cyr, C, Hazen, NL, Foster, S, Psouni, E, Cowan, PA, Cowan, CP, Rifkin-Graboi, A, Wilkins, D, Pierrehumbert, B, Tarabulsy, GM, Cárcamo, RA, Wang, Z, Liang, X, Kázmierczak, M, Pawlicka, P, Ayiro, L, Chansa, T, Sichimba, F, Mooya, H, McLean, L, Verissimo, M, Gojman-De-Millán, S, Moretti, MM, Bacro, F, Peltola, MJ, Galbally, M, Kondo-Ikemura, K, Behrens, KY, Scott, S, Rodriguez, AF, Spencer, R, Posada, G, Cassibba, R, Barrantes-Vidal, N, Palacios, J, Barone, L, Madigan, S, Mason-Jones, K, Reijman, S, Juffer, F, Fearon, RP, Bernier, A, Cicchetti, D, Roisman, GI, Cassidy, J, Kindler, H, Zimmerman, P, Feldman, R, Spangle, G, Zeanah, CH, Dozier, M, Belsky, J, Lamb, ME, and Duschinsky, R

Published
2022

8. The Influence of Foster Parent Investment on Children's Representations of Self and Attachment Figures

Author

Ackerman, J.P and Dozier, M.

Abstract

This study examined associations between foster mothers' emotional investment, assessed when foster children were age 2, and foster children's representations of self and others, assessed when children were age 5. Caregiver investment was assessed using a semi-structured interview called the ''This is My Baby'' interview (TIMB; Bates, B., & Dozier, M. (2002). The importance of maternal state of mind regarding attachment and infant age at placement to foster mothers' representations of their foster infants. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23, 417-431.) administered to foster mothers when their foster children were age 2. Self-representations were assessed using a projective puppet interview (Cassidy, J. (1988). Child-mother attachment and the self in six-year olds. Child Development, 59, 121-134.) when children were age 5. Children's ability to cope with separations from caregivers was examined using the Separation Anxiety Test (SAT; Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points in attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, (Serial No. 209), 66-104.). As predicted, foster mothers who were more accepting of their children early in the child-caregiver relationship had foster children who developed more positive self-representations than children whose foster mothers were less accepting. Additionally, caregiver acceptance was associated with children's quality of coping responses in response to caregiver separations, with high caregiver acceptance associated with effective solutions to separation scenarios.

Published
2005
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues

Author

Forslund, T., Granqvist, P., van IJzendoorn, M.H., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Glaser, D., Steele, M., Hammarlund, M., Schuengel, C., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., Steele, H., Shaver, P.R., Lux, U., Simmonds, J., Jacobvitz, D., Groh, A.M., Bernard, K., Cyr, C., Hazen, N.L., Foster, S., Psouni, E., Cowan, P.A., Pape Cowan, C., Rifkin-Graboi, A., Wilkins, D., Pierrehumbert, B., Tarabulsy, G.M., Carcamo, R.A., Wang, Z., Liang, X., Kázmierczak, M., Pawlicka, P., Ayiro, L., Chansa, T., Sichimba, F., Mooya, H., McLean, L., Verissimo, M., Gojman-de-Millán, S., Moretti, M.M., Bacro, F., Peltola, M.J., Galbally, M., Kondo-Ikemura, K., Behrens, K.Y., Scott, S., Rodriguez, A.F., Spencer, R., Posada, G., Cassibba, R., Barrantes-Vidal, N., Palacios, J., Barone, L., Madigan, S., Mason-Jones, K., Reijman, S., Juffer, F., Pasco Fearon, R., Bernier, A., Cicchetti, D., Roisman, G.I., Cassidy, J., Kindler, H., Zimmermann, P., Feldman, R., Spangler, G., Zeanah, C.H., Dozier, M., Belsky, J., Lamb, M.E., Duschinsky, R., Forslund, T., Granqvist, P., van IJzendoorn, M.H., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Glaser, D., Steele, M., Hammarlund, M., Schuengel, C., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., Steele, H., Shaver, P.R., Lux, U., Simmonds, J., Jacobvitz, D., Groh, A.M., Bernard, K., Cyr, C., Hazen, N.L., Foster, S., Psouni, E., Cowan, P.A., Pape Cowan, C., Rifkin-Graboi, A., Wilkins, D., Pierrehumbert, B., Tarabulsy, G.M., Carcamo, R.A., Wang, Z., Liang, X., Kázmierczak, M., Pawlicka, P., Ayiro, L., Chansa, T., Sichimba, F., Mooya, H., McLean, L., Verissimo, M., Gojman-de-Millán, S., Moretti, M.M., Bacro, F., Peltola, M.J., Galbally, M., Kondo-Ikemura, K., Behrens, K.Y., Scott, S., Rodriguez, A.F., Spencer, R., Posada, G., Cassibba, R., Barrantes-Vidal, N., Palacios, J., Barone, L., Madigan, S., Mason-Jones, K., Reijman, S., Juffer, F., Pasco Fearon, R., Bernier, A., Cicchetti, D., Roisman, G.I., Cassidy, J., Kindler, H., Zimmermann, P., Feldman, R., Spangler, G., Zeanah, C.H., Dozier, M., Belsky, J., Lamb, M.E., and Duschinsky, R.

Abstract

Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilisation of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. The article is divided into two parts. In the first, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child’s need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behaviour to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behaviour should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration.

Published
2021

10. Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues

Author

Forslund, T. (Tommie), Granqvist, P. (Pehr), IJzendoorn, M.H. (Rien) van, Sagi-Schwartz, A. (Avi), Glaser, D. (Danya), Steele, M. (Miriam), Hammarlund, M. (Mårten), Schuengel, C. (Carlo), Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J. (Marian), Steele, H. (Howard), Shaver, P.R. (Phillip R.), Lux, U. (Ulrike), Simmonds, J. (John), Jacobvitz, D. (Deborah), Groh, A.M. (Ashley M.), Bernard, K. (Kristin), Cyr, C. (Chantal), Hazen, N.L. (Nancy L.), Foster, S. (Sarah), Psouni, E. (Elia), Cowan, P.A. (Philip A.), Pape Cowan, C. (Carolyn), Rifkin-Graboi, A. (Anne), Wilkins, D. (David), Pierrehumbert, B. (Blaise), Tarabulsy, G.M. (George M.), Carcamo, R.A. (Rodrigo A.), Wang, Z. (Zhengyan), Liang, X. (Xi), Kázmierczak, M. (Maria), Pawlicka, P. (Paulina), Ayiro, L. (Lilian), Chansa, T. (Tamara), Sichimba, F. (Francis), Mooya, H. (Haatembo), McLean, L. (Loyola), Verissimo, M. (Manuela), Gojman-de-Millán, S. (Sonia), Moretti, M.M. (Marlene M.), Bacro, F. (Fabien), Peltola, M.J. (Mikko J.), Galbally, M. (Megan), Kondo-Ikemura, K. (Kiyomi), Behrens, K.Y. (Kazuko Y.), Scott, S. (Stephen), Rodriguez, A.F. (Andrés Fresno), Spencer, R. (Rosario), Posada, G. (Germán), Cassibba, R. (Rosalinda), Barrantes-Vidal, N. (Neus), Palacios, J. (Jesus), Barone, L. (Lavinia), Madigan, S. (Sheri), Mason-Jones, K. (Karen), Reijman, S. (Sophie), Juffer, F. (Femmie), Pasco Fearon, R. (R.), Bernier, A. (Annie), Cicchetti, D. (Dante), Roisman, G.I. (Glenn), Cassidy, J. (Jude), Kindler, H. (Heinz), Zimmerman, P. (Peter), Feldman, R. (Ruth), Spangler, G. (Gottfried), Zeanah, C.H. (Charles H.), Dozier, M. (Mary), Belsky, J. (Jay), Lamb, M.E. (Michael E.), Duschinsky, R. (Robbie), Forslund, T. (Tommie), Granqvist, P. (Pehr), IJzendoorn, M.H. (Rien) van, Sagi-Schwartz, A. (Avi), Glaser, D. (Danya), Steele, M. (Miriam), Hammarlund, M. (Mårten), Schuengel, C. (Carlo), Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J. (Marian), Steele, H. (Howard), Shaver, P.R. (Phillip R.), Lux, U. (Ulrike), Simmonds, J. (John), Jacobvitz, D. (Deborah), Groh, A.M. (Ashley M.), Bernard, K. (Kristin), Cyr, C. (Chantal), Hazen, N.L. (Nancy L.), Foster, S. (Sarah), Psouni, E. (Elia), Cowan, P.A. (Philip A.), Pape Cowan, C. (Carolyn), Rifkin-Graboi, A. (Anne), Wilkins, D. (David), Pierrehumbert, B. (Blaise), Tarabulsy, G.M. (George M.), Carcamo, R.A. (Rodrigo A.), Wang, Z. (Zhengyan), Liang, X. (Xi), Kázmierczak, M. (Maria), Pawlicka, P. (Paulina), Ayiro, L. (Lilian), Chansa, T. (Tamara), Sichimba, F. (Francis), Mooya, H. (Haatembo), McLean, L. (Loyola), Verissimo, M. (Manuela), Gojman-de-Millán, S. (Sonia), Moretti, M.M. (Marlene M.), Bacro, F. (Fabien), Peltola, M.J. (Mikko J.), Galbally, M. (Megan), Kondo-Ikemura, K. (Kiyomi), Behrens, K.Y. (Kazuko Y.), Scott, S. (Stephen), Rodriguez, A.F. (Andrés Fresno), Spencer, R. (Rosario), Posada, G. (Germán), Cassibba, R. (Rosalinda), Barrantes-Vidal, N. (Neus), Palacios, J. (Jesus), Barone, L. (Lavinia), Madigan, S. (Sheri), Mason-Jones, K. (Karen), Reijman, S. (Sophie), Juffer, F. (Femmie), Pasco Fearon, R. (R.), Bernier, A. (Annie), Cicchetti, D. (Dante), Roisman, G.I. (Glenn), Cassidy, J. (Jude), Kindler, H. (Heinz), Zimmerman, P. (Peter), Feldman, R. (Ruth), Spangler, G. (Gottfried), Zeanah, C.H. (Charles H.), Dozier, M. (Mary), Belsky, J. (Jay), Lamb, M.E. (Michael E.), and Duschinsky, R. (Robbie)

Abstract

Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilisation of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. The article is divided into two parts. In the first, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child’s need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behaviour to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behaviour should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. El Apego Va a Juicio: Problemas de Custodia y Protección Infantil1

Author

Forslund, T., Granqvist, P., van IJzendoorn, M.H., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Glaser, D., Steele, M., Hammarlund, M., Schuengel, C., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., Steele, H., Shaver, P.R., Lux, U., Simmonds, J., Jacobvitz, D., Groh, A.M., Bernard, K., Cyr, C., Hazen, N.L., Foster, S., Psouni, E., Cowan, P.A., Cowan, C.P., Rifkin-Graboi, A., Wilkins, D., Pierrehumbert, B., Tarabulsy, G.M., Carcamo, R.A., Wang, Z., Liang, X., Kázmierczak, M., Pawlicka, P., Ayiro, L., Chansa, T., Sichimba, F., Mooya, H., McLean, L., Verissimo, M., Gojman-de-Millán, S., Moretti, M.M., Bacro, F., Peltola, M.J., Galbally, M., Kondo-Ikemura, K., Behrens, K.Y., Scott, S., Rodriguez, A.F., Spencer, R., Posada, G., Cassibba, R., Barrantes-Vidal, N., Palacios, J., Barone, L., Madigan, S., Mason-Jones, K., Reijman, S., Juffer, F., Fearon, R.P., Bernier, A., Cicchetti, D., Roisman, G.I., Cassidy, J., Kindler, H., Zimmermann, P., Feldman, R., Spangle, G., Zeanah, C.H., Dozier, M., Belsky, J., Lamb, M.E., Duschinsky, R., Forslund, T., Granqvist, P., van IJzendoorn, M.H., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Glaser, D., Steele, M., Hammarlund, M., Schuengel, C., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., Steele, H., Shaver, P.R., Lux, U., Simmonds, J., Jacobvitz, D., Groh, A.M., Bernard, K., Cyr, C., Hazen, N.L., Foster, S., Psouni, E., Cowan, P.A., Cowan, C.P., Rifkin-Graboi, A., Wilkins, D., Pierrehumbert, B., Tarabulsy, G.M., Carcamo, R.A., Wang, Z., Liang, X., Kázmierczak, M., Pawlicka, P., Ayiro, L., Chansa, T., Sichimba, F., Mooya, H., McLean, L., Verissimo, M., Gojman-de-Millán, S., Moretti, M.M., Bacro, F., Peltola, M.J., Galbally, M., Kondo-Ikemura, K., Behrens, K.Y., Scott, S., Rodriguez, A.F., Spencer, R., Posada, G., Cassibba, R., Barrantes-Vidal, N., Palacios, J., Barone, L., Madigan, S., Mason-Jones, K., Reijman, S., Juffer, F., Fearon, R.P., Bernier, A., Cicchetti, D., Roisman, G.I., Cassidy, J., Kindler, H., Zimmermann, P., Feldman, R., Spangle, G., Zeanah, C.H., Dozier, M., Belsky, J., Lamb, M.E., and Duschinsky, R.

Abstract

Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilisation of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. This article is divided into two parts. In the first part, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child’s need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behaviour to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behaviour should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration.

Published
2021

12. Examining Ecological Constraints on the Intergenerational Transmission of Attachment Via Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

Author

Verhage, M, Fearon, R, Schuengel, C, van IJzendoorn, M, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M, Madigan, S, Roisman, G, Oosterman, M, Behrens, K, Wong, M, Mangelsdorf, S, Priddis, L, Brisch, K, Arnott, B, Aviezer, O, Bailey, H, Behringer, J, Bernier, A, Cassibba, R, Cassidy, J, Coppola, G, Costantini, A, Cyr, C, Dozier, M, Ensink, K, Finger, B, Gojman, S, Harder, S, Hautamaki, A, Hazen, N, Ierardi, E, Jin, M, Jongenelen, I, Leerkes, E, Lionetti, F, Lyons-Ruth, K, Mcmahon, C, Meins, E, Pace, C, Raby, K, Riva Crugnola, C, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Schoppe-Sullivan, S, Steele, H, Steele, M, Tarabulsy, G, Væver, M, Brice, P, Castoro, G, Costantino, E, George, C, Gloger-Tippelt, G, Howes, C, Jacobvitz, D, Juffer, F, Kazui, M, Køppe, S, Millán, S, Murray, L, Pederson, D, Simonelli, A, Solomon, J, Speranza, A, Teti, D, van Londen-Barentsen, W, Ward, M, The Collaboration on Attachment Transmission, S, Verhage, Marije L., Fearon, R. M. Pasco, Schuengel, Carlo, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Madigan, Sheri, Roisman, Glenn I., Oosterman, Mirjam, Behrens, Kazuko Y., Wong, Maria S., Mangelsdorf, Sarah, Priddis, Lynn E., Brisch, Karl-Heinz, Arnott, B., Aviezer, O., Bailey, H., Behringer, J., Bernier, A., Cassibba, R., Cassidy, J., Coppola, G., Costantini, A., Cyr, C., Dozier, M., Ensink, K., Finger, B., Gojman, S., Harder, S., Hautamaki, A., Hazen, N. L., Ierardi, E., Jin, M. K., Jongenelen, I., Leerkes, E. M., Lionetti, F., Lyons-Ruth, K., McMahon, C., Meins, E., Pace, C. S., Priddis, L., Raby, K. L., Riva Crugnola, C., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Steele, H., Steele, M., Tarabulsy, G. M., Væver, M. S., Brice, P. J., Castoro, G., Costantino, E., George, C., Gloger-Tippelt, G., Howes, C., Jacobvitz, D., Juffer, F., Kazui, M., Køppe, S., Millán, S., Murray, L., Pederson, D. R., Simonelli, A., Solomon J., Speranza A. M., Teti, D. M., van Londen-Barentsen, W. M., Ward, M. J., The Collaboration on Attachment Transmission Synthesis, Verhage, M, Fearon, R, Schuengel, C, van IJzendoorn, M, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M, Madigan, S, Roisman, G, Oosterman, M, Behrens, K, Wong, M, Mangelsdorf, S, Priddis, L, Brisch, K, Arnott, B, Aviezer, O, Bailey, H, Behringer, J, Bernier, A, Cassibba, R, Cassidy, J, Coppola, G, Costantini, A, Cyr, C, Dozier, M, Ensink, K, Finger, B, Gojman, S, Harder, S, Hautamaki, A, Hazen, N, Ierardi, E, Jin, M, Jongenelen, I, Leerkes, E, Lionetti, F, Lyons-Ruth, K, Mcmahon, C, Meins, E, Pace, C, Raby, K, Riva Crugnola, C, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Schoppe-Sullivan, S, Steele, H, Steele, M, Tarabulsy, G, Væver, M, Brice, P, Castoro, G, Costantino, E, George, C, Gloger-Tippelt, G, Howes, C, Jacobvitz, D, Juffer, F, Kazui, M, Køppe, S, Millán, S, Murray, L, Pederson, D, Simonelli, A, Solomon, J, Speranza, A, Teti, D, van Londen-Barentsen, W, Ward, M, The Collaboration on Attachment Transmission, S, Verhage, Marije L., Fearon, R. M. Pasco, Schuengel, Carlo, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Madigan, Sheri, Roisman, Glenn I., Oosterman, Mirjam, Behrens, Kazuko Y., Wong, Maria S., Mangelsdorf, Sarah, Priddis, Lynn E., Brisch, Karl-Heinz, Arnott, B., Aviezer, O., Bailey, H., Behringer, J., Bernier, A., Cassibba, R., Cassidy, J., Coppola, G., Costantini, A., Cyr, C., Dozier, M., Ensink, K., Finger, B., Gojman, S., Harder, S., Hautamaki, A., Hazen, N. L., Ierardi, E., Jin, M. K., Jongenelen, I., Leerkes, E. M., Lionetti, F., Lyons-Ruth, K., McMahon, C., Meins, E., Pace, C. S., Priddis, L., Raby, K. L., Riva Crugnola, C., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Steele, H., Steele, M., Tarabulsy, G. M., Væver, M. S., Brice, P. J., Castoro, G., Costantino, E., George, C., Gloger-Tippelt, G., Howes, C., Jacobvitz, D., Juffer, F., Kazui, M., Køppe, S., Millán, S., Murray, L., Pederson, D. R., Simonelli, A., Solomon J., Speranza A. M., Teti, D. M., van Londen-Barentsen, W. M., Ward, M. J., and The Collaboration on Attachment Transmission Synthesis

Abstract

Parents’ attachment representations and child–parent attachment have been shown to be associated, but these associations vary across populations (Verhage et al., 2016). The current study examined whether ecological factors may explain variability in the strength of intergenerational transmission of attachment, using individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Analyses on 4,396 parent–child dyads (58 studies, child age 11–96 months) revealed a combined effect size of r =.29. IPD meta-analyses revealed that effect sizes for the transmission of autonomous-secure representations to secure attachments were weaker under risk conditions and weaker in adolescent parent–child dyads, whereas transmission was stronger for older children. Findings support the ecological constraints hypothesis on attachment transmission. Implications for attachment theory and the use of IPD meta-analysis are discussed.

Published
2018

13. Evaluation of some phosphorus index criteria in cultivated agriculture in clay soils

Author

Torbert, H.A., Harmel, R.D., Potter, K.N., and Dozier, M.

Subjects
Clay soils -- Research, Phosphorus -- Evaluation -- Research, Tillage -- Research, Environmental issues, Evaluation, Research
Abstract

Scientists and resource managers continue to have concerns regarding the potential negative water quality impact that may result from nonpoint additions of nutrients to watersheds. The greatest potential for nonpoint [...]

Published
2005

16. Examining Ecological Constraints on the Intergenerational Transmission of Attachment Via Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

Author

Verhage, Marije L., Fearon, R. M. Pasco, Schuengel, Carlo, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Madigan, Sheri, Roisman, Glenn I., Oosterman, Mirjam, Behrens, Kazuko Y., Wong, Maria S., Mangelsdorf, Sarah, Priddis, Lynn E., Brisch, Karl-Heinz, Arnott, B., Aviezer, O., Bailey, H., Behringer, J., Bernier, A., Cassibba, R., Cassidy, J., Coppola, G., Costantini, A., Cyr, C., Dozier, M., Ensink, K., Finger, B., Gojman, S., Harder, S., Hautamaki, A., Hazen, N. L., Ierardi, E., Jin, M. K., Jongenelen, I., Leerkes, E. M., Lionetti, F., Lyons-Ruth, K., McMahon, C., Meins, E., Pace, C. S., Priddis, L., Raby, K. L., Riva Crugnola, C., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Steele, H., Steele, M., Tarabulsy, G. M., Væver, M. S., Brice, P. J., Castoro, G., Costantino, E., George, C., Gloger-Tippelt, G., Howes, C., Jacobvitz, D., Juffer, F., Kazui, M., Køppe, S., Millán, S., Murray, L., Pederson, D. R., Simonelli, A., Solomon J., Speranza A. M., Teti, D. M., van Londen-Barentsen, W. M., Ward, M. J., The Collaboration on Attachment Transmission Synthesis, Verhage, M, Fearon, R, Schuengel, C, van IJzendoorn, M, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M, Madigan, S, Roisman, G, Oosterman, M, Behrens, K, Wong, M, Mangelsdorf, S, Priddis, L, Brisch, K, Arnott, B, Aviezer, O, Bailey, H, Behringer, J, Bernier, A, Cassibba, R, Cassidy, J, Coppola, G, Costantini, A, Cyr, C, Dozier, M, Ensink, K, Finger, B, Gojman, S, Harder, S, Hautamaki, A, Hazen, N, Ierardi, E, Jin, M, Jongenelen, I, Leerkes, E, Lionetti, F, Lyons-Ruth, K, Mcmahon, C, Meins, E, Pace, C, Raby, K, Riva Crugnola, C, Sagi-Schwartz, A, Schoppe-Sullivan, S, Steele, H, Steele, M, Tarabulsy, G, Væver, M, Brice, P, Castoro, G, Costantino, E, George, C, Gloger-Tippelt, G, Howes, C, Jacobvitz, D, Juffer, F, Kazui, M, Køppe, S, Millán, S, Murray, L, Pederson, D, Simonelli, A, Solomon, J, Speranza, A, Teti, D, van Londen-Barentsen, W, Ward, M, The Collaboration on Attachment Transmission, S, Clinical Child and Family Studies, APH - Mental Health, LEARN! - Social cognition and learning, and LEARN! - Brain, learning and development

Subjects
Male, Parents, Adolescent, Child age, Education, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Sex Factors, Sex factors, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Attachment theory, Humans, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 030212 general & internal medicine, Parent-Child Relations, Child, Object Attachment, Intergenerational transmission, Parenting, Ecology, Individual participant data, 05 social sciences, Age Factors, Intergenerational Transmission of Attachment, Meta-analysis, Child, Preschool, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Educational Status, Female, Psychology, 050104 developmental & child psychology
Abstract

Parents' attachment representations and child-parent attachment have been shown to be associated, but these associations vary across populations (Verhage et al., 2016). The current study examined whether ecological factors may explain variability in the strength of intergenerational transmission of attachment, using individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Analyses on 4,396 parent-child dyads (58 studies, child age 11-96 months) revealed a combined effect size of r = .29. IPD meta-analyses revealed that effect sizes for the transmission of autonomous-secure representations to secure attachments were weaker under risk conditions and weaker in adolescent parent-child dyads, whereas transmission was stronger for older children. Findings support the ecological constraints hypothesis on attachment transmission. Implications for attachment theory and the use of IPD meta-analysis are discussed.

Published
2018

20. Disorganized attachment in infancy: a review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers

Author

Granqvist, P, Sroufe, LA, Dozier, M, Hesse, E, Duschinsky, RN, Steele, M, Duschinsky, Robbie [0000-0003-2023-5328], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
attachment disorder, disorganized attachment, attachment-based interventions, infancy, maltreatment
Abstract

Disorganized/Disoriented (D) attachment has seen widespread interest from policy makers, practitioners, and clinicians in recent years. However, some of this interest seems to have been based on some false assumptions that (1) attachment measures can be used as definitive assessments of the individual in forensic/child protection settings and that disorganized attachment (2) reliably indicates child maltreatment, (3) is a strong predictor of pathology, and (4) represents a fixed or static “trait” of the child, impervious to development or help. This paper summarizes the evidence showing that these four assumptions are false and misleading. The paper reviews what is known about disorganized infant attachment and clarifies the implications of the classification for clinical and welfare practice with children. In particular, the difference between disorganized attachment and attachment disorder is examined, and a strong case is made for the value of attachment theory for supportive work with families and for the development and evaluation of evidence-based caregiving interventions.

Published
2017

24. Disorganized attachment in infancy: a review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers

Author

Granqvist, P. (Pehr), Sroufe, L.A. (L. Alan), Dozier, M. (Mary), Hesse, E. (Erik), Steele, M. (Miriam), IJzendoorn, M.H. (Rien) van, Solomon, J. (Judith), Schuengel, C. (Carlo), Fearon, P. (Pasco), Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J. (Marian), Steele, H. (Howard), Cassidy, J. (Jude), Carlson, E. (Elizabeth), Madigan, S. (Sheri), Jacobvitz, D. (Deborah), Foster, S. (Sarah), Behrens, K. (Kazuko), Rifkin-Graboi, A. (Anne), Gribneau, N. (Naomi), Spangler, G. (Gottfried), Ward, M.J. (Mary J), True, M. (Mary), Spieker, S. (Susan), Reijman, S. (Sophie), Reisz, S. (Samantha), Tharner, A. (Anne), Nkara, F. (Frances), Goldwyn, R. (Ruth), Sroufe, J. (June), Pederson, D. (David), Pederson, D. (Deanne), Weigand, R. (Robert), Siegel, D. (Daniel), Dazzi, N. (Nino), Bernard, K. (Kristin), Fonagy, P. (Peter), Waters, E. (Everett), Toth, S. (Sheree), Cicchetti, D. (Dante), Zeanah, C.H. (Charles H), Lyons-Ruth, K. (Karlen), Main, M. (Mary), Duschinsky, R. (Robbie), Granqvist, P. (Pehr), Sroufe, L.A. (L. Alan), Dozier, M. (Mary), Hesse, E. (Erik), Steele, M. (Miriam), IJzendoorn, M.H. (Rien) van, Solomon, J. (Judith), Schuengel, C. (Carlo), Fearon, P. (Pasco), Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J. (Marian), Steele, H. (Howard), Cassidy, J. (Jude), Carlson, E. (Elizabeth), Madigan, S. (Sheri), Jacobvitz, D. (Deborah), Foster, S. (Sarah), Behrens, K. (Kazuko), Rifkin-Graboi, A. (Anne), Gribneau, N. (Naomi), Spangler, G. (Gottfried), Ward, M.J. (Mary J), True, M. (Mary), Spieker, S. (Susan), Reijman, S. (Sophie), Reisz, S. (Samantha), Tharner, A. (Anne), Nkara, F. (Frances), Goldwyn, R. (Ruth), Sroufe, J. (June), Pederson, D. (David), Pederson, D. (Deanne), Weigand, R. (Robert), Siegel, D. (Daniel), Dazzi, N. (Nino), Bernard, K. (Kristin), Fonagy, P. (Peter), Waters, E. (Everett), Toth, S. (Sheree), Cicchetti, D. (Dante), Zeanah, C.H. (Charles H), Lyons-Ruth, K. (Karlen), Main, M. (Mary), and Duschinsky, R. (Robbie)

Abstract

Disorganized/Disoriented (D) attachment has seen widespread interest from policy makers, practitioners, and clinicians in recent years. However, some of this interest seems to have been based on some false assumptions that (1) attachment measures can be used as definitive assessments of the individual in forensic/child protection settings and that disorganized attachment (2) reliably indicates child maltreatment, (3) is a strong predictor of pathology, and (4) represents a fixed or static “trait” of the child, impervious to development or help. This paper summarizes the evidence showing that these four assumptions are false and misleading. The paper reviews what is known about disorganized infant attachment and clarifies the implications of the classification for clinical and welfare practice with children. In particular, the difference between disorganized attachment and attachment disorder is examined, and a

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. ENDARTERECTOMY FOR ASYMPTOMATIC CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS

Author

Walker, M, Marler, J, Goldstein, M, Grady, P, Toole, J, Baker, W, Castaldo, J, Chambless, L, Moore, W, Robertson, J, Young, B, Howard, V, Purvis, S, Vernon, D, Needham, K, Beck, P, Dozier, M, Lefkowitz, D, Howard, G, Crouse, J, Herrington, D, Furberg, C, Essick, K, Hicks, R, and Nelson, J

Published
2016

27. Which professional (non-technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 38

Author

Cake, M.A., Bell, M.A., Williams, J.C., Brown, F.J.L., Dozier, M., Rhind, S.M., Baillie, S., Cake, M.A., Bell, M.A., Williams, J.C., Brown, F.J.L., Dozier, M., Rhind, S.M., and Baillie, S.

Abstract

Background: Despite the growing prominence of professional (non-technical) competencies in veterinary education, the evidence to support their importance to veterinary graduates is unclear. Aim: To summarize current evidence within the veterinary literature for the importance of professional competencies to graduate success. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted (CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, Australian and British Education Index, Dissertations & Theses) from 1988 to 2015 and limited to the veterinary discipline (veterinar* term required). Evidence was sought from consensus-based competence frameworks, surveys of stakeholder perceptions, and empirical evidence linked to relevant outcomes (e.g. employability, client satisfaction or compliance). Data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers and included a quality assessment of each source. Results: Fifty-two sources were included in the review, providing evidence from expert frameworks (10 sources), stakeholder perceptions (30 sources, including one from the previous category), and empirical research (13 sources). Communication skills were the only competency to be well-supported by all three categories of evidence. Other competencies supported by multiple sources of empirical evidence include empathy, relationship-centered care, self-efficacy, and business skills. Other competencies perceived to be relatively more important included awareness of limitations, professional values, critical thinking, collaboration, and resilience. Conclusions: This review has highlighted the comparatively weak body of evidence supporting the importance of professional competencies for veterinary graduate success, with the exception of communication skills. However we stress this is more indicative of the scarcity of high-quality veterinary-based education research in the field, than of the true priority of these competencies.

Published
2016

32. ENDARTERECTOMY FOR ASYMPTOMATIC CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS

Author

WALKER, M, MARLER, J, GOLDSTEIN, M, GRADY, P, TOOLE, J, BAKER, W, CASTALDO, J, CHAMBLESS, L, MOORE, W, ROBERTSON, J, YOUNG, B, HOWARD, V, PURVIS, S, VERNON, D, NEEDHAM, K, BECK, P, DOZIER, M, LEFKOWITZ, D, HOWARD, G, CROUSE, J, HERRINGTON, D, FURBERG, C, ESSICK, K, HICKS, R, NELSON, J, BALL, W, BLAND, E, CONDON, S, ELLIOTT, T, GRIZZLE, J, HAYES, D, HENLEY, S, JOHNSON, J, LOCKLEAR, J, MISCH, M, PATON, C, SCHWARTZ, S, WALKER, C, WILLIAMS, O, EASTON, J, GOLDSTONE, J, HALLENBECK, J, HOFF, J, KARP, H, KRONMAL, R, BROTT, T, TOMSICK, T, BRODERICK, J, SAUERBECK, L, BLUM, C, DYKEN, M, BRUST, J, DICK, A, GOTSHALL, R, HEYMAN, A, SWANSON, P, ADAMS, H, DEMPSEY, R, ERNST, C, ROTHROCK, J, COHEN, S, NICHOLAS, G, LONGENECKER, J, BARBOUR, P, BERGER, A, CELANI, V, ECKERT, N, GOODREAU, J, HUTCHINSON, J, JENNY, D, LIN, Z, MCDONALD, K, PISTONE, W, RAEGRANT, A, REDENBAUGH, J, REX, J, WOHLBERG, C, KARANJIA, P, SWANSON, M, LOBNER, S, KOLTS, R, KUEHNER, M, HINER, B, MADDEN, K, CARLSON, R, DAVIS, J, GALLANT, T, WARNER, J, FAUST, A, FRYZA, N, HASENAUER, J, REGNER, M, RONKIN, L, SCHAEFER, S, STRACK, D, TURNER, L, WALGENBACH, A, GRAVES, J, MICHALSKI, S, SCHUETTE, L, MOHR, J, TATEMICHI, T, MARSHALL, R, MAST, H, RAMOS, O, CORRELL, J, LIBMAN, R, PETTY, G, CABRERE, A, OROPEZA, L, GONZALEZ, T, PETTIGREW, C, SADLER, R, ENDEAN, E, SHERROW, J, HAUER, M, LEE, C, NORTON, J, MCQUILLEN, M, MATTINGLY, S, DEKOSKY, S, MASSEY, A, SIMARD, D, TURCOTTE, J, BENGUIGUI, C, COTE, J, BOUCHARD, J, ROBERGE, C, BRUNET, D, BEDARD, F, LANGELIER, R, LAJEUNESSE, M, BIGAOUETTE, J, PARENT, J, LYDEN, P, HYE, R, LEWIS, S, CALI, G, BABCOCK, T, TAFTALVAREZ, B, BRODY, M, ZWEIFLER, R, SEDWITZ, M, STABILE, B, FREISCHLAG, J, WOLF, Y, SIVO, J, FORSYTHE, J, ADAME, M, GUPTA, S, BURKE, K, GREISLER, H, LITTOOY, F, KELLY, M, PULSINELLI, W, CAMPBELL, J, CROCKARELL, J, WATRIDGE, C, ACKER, J, ERKULWATER, S, JACEWICZ, M, WALKER, G, OSULLIVAN, P, SAUER, C, VASU, K, GAINES, K, BAKHITIAN, B, BERTORINI, T, BENNETT, S, THOMAS, T, STAHL, N, TAYLOR, C, GIAMPAPA, M, CONNELL, J, RILEY, J, BRADLEY, A, NEWMAN, K, MANNING, R, MCCREA, M, HACHINSKI, V, FERGUSON, G, MAYER, C, BARNETT, J, PEERLESS, S, BUCHAN, A, REICHMAN, H, KERTESZ, A, LOWNIE, S, WHITE, C, FOX, A, RANKIN, R, SPENCE, J, BARR, H, PADDOCKELIASZIW, L, ASSIS, L, PEXMAN, J, DICICCO, M, TATE, B, JAMES, C, RAKER, E, COATSWORTH, J, HARRIS, S, BEEBE, H, BIRCHFIELD, R, BUTLERLEVY, K, CRANE, R, FRYER, D, MACLEAN, J, PATTERSON, L, QUIGLEY, T, RAVITS, J, TAYLOR, L, PULLEN, S, BOSWELL, S, KENNY, K, ROEDERSHEIMER, L, FOWL, R, TEW, J, KEMPCZINSKI, R, REED, R, WELLING, R, SCHOMAKER, B, MCWHORTER, J, BRANCH, C, SATTERFIELD, J, CORDELL, R, DEAN, R, PLONK, G, HARPOLD, G, WALKER, F, NUNN, C, MYERS, L, TEGELER, C, HARDIN, S, MEADS, D, LOFTUS, C, VINING, L, BENDIXEN, B, BILLER, J, CORSON, J, DAVIS, P, GODERSKY, J, GORDON, D, JACOBY, M, KAPPELLE, L, KRESOWIK, T, MARSH, E, LOVE, B, SHAMMA, A, GRIMSMAN, K, KARBOSKI, D, MILLER, E, JOHNSON, C, JONES, C, STONE, B, MAGUIRE, M, EARLEY, C, KAPLAN, P, CAVALUZZI, J, WATERS, G, CHACHICH, B, AUER, A, LOGAN, W, WILCOX, M, GREEN, B, HURLEY, J, PENNELL, R, WOODS, J, LEVINE, R, NEPUTE, J, THOMASSON, J, BLACKBURN, C, FOLDES, M, KLEMP, K, NAPPIER, B, RUTHERFORD, K, SCHROER, S, HOGAN, J, THORPE, L, FEINBERG, W, HUNTER, G, BRUCK, D, BERNHARD, V, MCINTYRE, K, CARTER, L, LABADIE, E, JOHNSON, D, MOSCHONAS, C, HAMILTON, R, FORRER, S, SEEGER, J, CARMODY, R, VOLD, B, LAGUNA, J, KRIKAWA, J, DEVINE, J, CASTRILLO, A, KISTLER, S, LEDBETTER, B, DORR, K, SMITH, R, HAERER, A, BROWN, R, RUSSELL, W, RIGDON, E, RHODES, R, SMITH, E, GRAEBER, M, DOORENBOS, D, SUBRAMONY, S, ATNIP, R, BRENNAN, R, FRIEDMAN, D, NEUMYER, M, THIELE, B, SMITH, F, BARR, J, DUCKROW, R, JANESKY, C, MEILSTRUP, J, MCNAMARA, K, RODICHOK, L, STEWART, L, SULLIVAN, M, WENGROVITZ, M, CLAGETT, G, UNWIN, H, BRYAN, W, MATKINS, C, PATTERSON, C, ALWAY, C, BOYD, P, INMAN, M, ALBISTON, C, SCOGGINS, E, SWILLING, J, WALDEN, K, AHN, S, AMOS, E, BAKER, J, DOBKIN, B, DONAYRE, C, GELABERT, H, JORDAN, S, MACHLEDER, H, QUINONESBALDRICH, W, SAVER, J, ELSADEN, S, HOLGATE, R, JABOUR, B, JACOBS, J, ABRAHAM, T, VESCERA, C, VONRAJCS, J, CARTER, V, CARTER, D, DIXGOSS, D, HERNANDEZ, E, COULL, B, LOBOA, L, MONETA, G, PORTER, J, YEAGER, R, WHITTAKER, L, BRASS, L, GUSBERG, R, LOVEJOY, A, FAYAD, P, SUMPIO, B, MEIER, G, CHANG, V, MARZITELLI, K, CHYATTE, D, HAMMERS, L, LEPORE, F, PAVALKIS, F, MELE, J, KISIEL, D, BARNES, R, CHESSER, M, ARCHER, R, THOMPSON, B, MACDONALD, C, BARONE, G, EIDT, J, HARSHFIELD, D, MCFARLAND, D, NICKOLS, J, HOWARD, C, NIX, M, OVERSTREET, J, TROILLETT, R, TAYLOR, J, LEE, H, AKINS, P, HARBISON, J, PRIDGEON, R, FELTON, W, POSNER, M, SOBEL, M, CLIFTON, G, CONWAY, C, COCKRELL, A, STRINGER, W, WINGO, J, NICHOLS, B, SMOKER, W, FISHER, R, SPETZLER, R, FREY, J, ZABRAMSKI, J, HUNSLEY, S, JAHNKE, H, PLENGE, K, HOLLAND, R, TURNER, R, STRAVA, D, STUMPFF, S, HODAK, J, FLOM, R, DEAN, B, THOMPSON, R, HUGHES, R, LEPLER, B, BOWEN, J, BENOIT, C, HOLLIER, L, OCHSNER, J, STRUB, R, LANG, V, CAHANIN, V, HOBSON, R, WEISBROT, F, KAMIN, S, BACK, T, JAMIL, Z, ROGERS, C, LAINSON, B, HART, L, CAPLAN, L, ODONNELL, T, BARRON, L, PESSIN, M, DEWITT, D, MACKEY, W, BELKIN, M, MCGLAUGHLIN, R, HEGGERICK, P, WELCH, K, WILCZEWSKI, J, ROBERTSON, W, DALEY, S, ELLIOT, J, REDDY, D, SHEPHARD, A, LEVINE, S, RAMADAN, N, TIETJEN, G, MITSIAS, P, GORMAN, M, MCPHARLIN, M, PATEL, S, DEVESHWAR, R, LEE, N, KOKKINOS, J, WEINSTEIN, E, KUNKEL, J, KRATOCHVIL, A, JOHNSON, E, STEEL, S, NORRIS, J, ROWED, D, BOWYER, B, GAWEL, M, COOPER, P, BRODIE, D, KIRKLAND, J, SCHECTER, J, FARRAR, N, CAPPS, R, RHODES, E, ROGERS, D, GLASS, J, NAGUSZEWSKI, R, NAGUSZEWSKI, W, MADDOX, B, DOLLISON, B, MOULTON, L, COLE, P, KINSELLA, P, ANSLEY, A, BRITZ, N, BIVINS, D, WILLIAMS, E, DAVIDSON, J, ELIAS, W, ATKINS, D, TURNER, P, BURCH, J, NOLAN, D, SPEESE, R, FOLEY, C, MILLETTE, T, LANE, K, ALMOND, C, MESTAYER, R, CALANCHINI, P, SZARNICKI, R, RADOSEVICH, P, ELIAS, L, MCCORMICK, P, GOULD, C, NORRIS, F, DENYS, E, BERNSTEIN, R, DUBONO, D, ATKINSON, K, PETERS, M, COHEN, B, YAO, J, ROSTON, S, BLACKBURN, D, CHADWICK, L, MCCARTHY, W, PEARCE, W, FRANK, J, FERNANDEZBEER, E, PATRICK, J, GREEN, R, SATRAN, R, RICOTTA, J, DEWEESE, J, HOLLANDER, J, OBRIEN, M, MCNAMARA, J, ROSE, S, COHEN, D, FURLAN, A, LITTLE, J, BRYERTON, B, SILA, C, AWAD, I, CHIMOWITZ, M, ROBERTSON, S, BECKER, C, PAUSHTER, D, OLEARY, D, JONES, A, GEE, W, SHEBEL, N, FISHER, M, SCHENK, E, FUTRELL, N, MILLIKAN, C, DIENER, H, FIELDS, W, FOLSTEIN, M, GAUTIER, J, HARRISON, M, HASS, W, HENNERICI, M, SPENCER, M, and VONREUTERN, G

Published
1995

41. METRO -- the creation of a taxonomy for medical education.

Author

Haig A, Ellaway R, Dozier M, Liu D, and McKendree J

Abstract

AIMS: There is a proven and immediate need for a shared vocabulary for medical education in the United Kingdom, both to support the practice of medical education and the research of medical education practice. It would be inefficient to create a complete and independent vocabulary from scratch, the proposed alternative being to create differential terms between the MeSH and BET vocabularies. METHODS: Existing schemas were reviewed against the needs of stakeholders. Seed terms were submitted to the METRO work environment, discussed, scoped and voted upon. RESULTS: A set of procedures, initial terms and recommendations for further development are the principal deliverables from METRO's first phase, while the ongoing second phase will see the creation and testing of an essential branch of descriptors for assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Further work in a number of areas will be required and long-term issues of resourcing and sustainability have yet to be substantially addressed to allow for full adoption by the user community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2004
Full Text
View/download PDF

42. Attachment for infants in foster care: the role of caregiver state of mind.

Author

Dozier, Mary, Stoval, K. Chase, Albus, Kathleen E., Bates, Brady, Dozier, M, Stovall, K C, Albus, K E, and Bates, B

Subjects
FOSTER home care, PARENT-child relationships & psychology, ATTACHMENT behavior
Abstract

The concordance between foster mothers' attachment state of mind and foster infants' attachment quality was examined for 50 foster mother-infant dyads. Babies had been placed into the care of their foster mothers between birth and 20 months of age. Attachment quality was assessed between 12 and 24 months of age, at least 3 months after the infants' placement into foster care. The two-way correspondence between maternal state of mind and infant attachment quality was 72%, kappa = .43, similar to the level seen among biologically intact mother-infant dyads. Contrary to expectations, age at placement was not related to attachment quality. Rather, concordance between maternal state of mind and infant attachment was seen for relatively late-placed babies, as well as early placed babies. These findings have two major implications. First, following a disruption in care during the first year and a half of life, babies appear capable of organizing their behavior around the availability of new caregivers. Second, these data argue for a nongenetic mechanism for the intergenerational transmission of attachment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2001
Full Text
View/download PDF

43. TOXICOLOGIC EVALUATION OF FLAVOR INGREDIENTS ADDED TO CIGARETTE TOBACCO: 13-WEEK INHALATION EXPOSURES IN RATS.

Author

Gaworski, C. L., Dozier, M. M., Heck, J. D., Gerhart, J. M., Rajendran, N., David, R. M., Brennecke, L. H., and Morrissey, R.

Subjects
*CIGARETTES, *TOBACCO smoke, *LABORATORY rats, *ADDITIVES
Abstract

Over 170 flavoring ingredients commonly used in the manufacture of American-style blended cigarettes were evaluated in 4 subchronic nose-only smoke inhalation studies. Male and female Fischer 344 rats were exposed 1 h/ day, 5 days/ wk, for 13 wk to smoke from cigarettes containing mixtures of flavor ingredients at target mainstream smoke particulate concentrations between 150 and 1200 mg/m 3. For comparison, separate groups of rats were exposed to smoke from nonflavored reference cigarettes of similar construction and tobacco blend, or to filtered air. Internal dose biomarkers (carboxyhemoglobin, serum nicotine, and serum cotinine) were measured during the studies to monitor smoke exposure. Effects typically noted in rats exposed to mainstream tobacco smoke were similar for both flavored and non-flavored cigarette types. Dose-related reductions in body weights, increased organ-to-body weight ratios for the heart and lungs, and a trend toward decreased blood glucose concentrations in males were noted in the smoke-exposed groups. Exposure-related histopathologic changes occurred only in the respiratory tract. These changes were primarily associated with epithelial tissue, and presented as hyperplasia and/or metaplasia in the nose and larynx. The anterior sections of the nose were more severely affected than were the more posterior regions. Macrophages and areas of epithelial hyperplasia were observed in the lungs of smoke-exposed animals. All smoke-related histopathologic effects diminished significantly during a 6-wk postexposure recovery period. The results indicate that theaddition of these flavoring ingredients to cigarette tobacco had no discernible effect on the character or extent of the biologic responses normally associated with inhalation of mainstream cigarette smoke in rats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
1998
Full Text
View/download PDF

44. METRO taxonomy -- progress report on assessment.

Author

Haig A, Dozier M, Liu D, McKendree J, Roper T, and Selai C

Abstract

The Medical Education Taxonomy Research Organization (METRO) was formed to map and create terms to comprehensively describe the processes, procedures and concepts of medical education. The terms will be used in a variety of purposes, such as describing content for retrieval from e-learning environments, indexing literature in databases, and extracting and exchanging data for research, such as for BEME systematic reviews. METRO has now completed an extensive set of descriptors for assessment, which are freely available at http://metro2.blogspot.com. The organization welcomes the response and participation of all medical education professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2005
Full Text
View/download PDF

47. Book review.

Author

Bick J and Dozier M

Published
2009

49. BEME GUIDE NO 3:SYSTEMATIC SEARCHING FOR EVIDENCE IN MEDICAL EDUCATION:PART 2:CONSTRUCTING SEARCHES (Book).

Author

Haig, A. and Dozier, M.

Subjects
*MEDICAL education, *TERMS & phrases, *EDUCATIONAL journalism, *PROFESSIONAL education, *TRAINING of health care teams, *PERIODICALS
Abstract

Searching for information is a tricky business. Searching for medical education involves searching in medical journals (vast numbers - needle in a haystack), educational journals (again vast numbers - the jargon quotient is immense), and medical education journals (small numbers). This article shows how to do a search, discusses the core concepts (including Boolean algebra) and illustrates the process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2004

50. Enhancing visitation in the child welfare system for children separated from their birth parents: pilot results of fostering relationships.

Author

Burtch EN, Macera E, Shauffer C, Gupta A, and Dozier M

Abstract

When children are placed into foster care, they experience separations from their primary attachment figures. Visitations are often arranged to provide ongoing birth parent-child contact. These visitations are complicated, though, because young children typically show a range of confusing behaviors when reunited. Fostering Relationships is a brief intervention designed to enhance visitation for the child, birth parent, and foster parent. We examined the effectiveness of the Fostering Relationships intervention through single subject analyses. We examined whether birth parents followed their child's lead during visitation sessions significantly more than they did not follow their child's lead. Six of seven birth parents who received the Fostering Relationships intervention followed their child's lead significantly more often than not, whereas only one of four of the control parents did so. Results are preliminary, but suggest that Fostering Relationships may be a promising intervention for enhancing visitation.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results