Search

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with lung cancer may experience treatment delays. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of extended treatment delays on survival among patients with stage I typical bronchopulmonary carcinoid (BC), lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) or invasive adenocarcinoma with a lepidic component (ADL). Methods Using National Cancer Database data (2004-2015), multivariable Cox regression analysis with penalized smoothing splines was performed to examine the association between treatment delay and all-cause mortality for stage I BC, LPA, and ADL. Propensity score–matched analyses compared the overall survival of patients who received “early” vs “delayed” surgery (ie, 0-30 vs 90-120 days after diagnosis) across the different histologic subtypes. Results During the study period, patients with stage I BC (n = 4947), LPA (n = 5340), and ADL (n = 6816) underwent surgery. Cox regression analysis of these cohorts showed a gradual steady increase in the hazard ratio the longer treatment is delayed. However, in propensity score–matched analyses that created cohorts of patients who underwent early and delayed surgery that were well-balanced in patient characteristics, no significant differences in 5-year survival were found between early and delayed surgery for stage I BC (87% [95% CI:77%-93%] vs 89% [95% CI: 80%-94%]), stage I LPA (73% [95% CI: 64%-80%] vs 77% [95% CI: 68%-83%]), and stage I ADL (71% [95% CI: 64%-76%] vs 69% [95% CI: 60%-76%]). Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic, for early-stage indolent lung tumors and part-solid ground glass lung nodules, a delay of surgery by 3-4 months after diagnosis can be considered.

BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in several specialties reduce length of stay, but accelerated discharge after thoracic surgery is not well characterized. This study tested the hypothesis that patients discharged on postoperative day 1 (POD1) after lobectomy for lung cancer have an increased risk of readmission. METHODS Patients who underwent a lobectomy for lung cancer between 2011 and 2019 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified. Readmission rates were compared between patients discharged on postoperative day 1 (POD 1) and patients discharged on POD 2 to 6. Early discharge and readmission predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Only 854 (3.8%) of 22,585 patients who met inclusion criteria were discharged on POD 1, although POD 1 discharge rates increased from 2.3% to 8.1% (P < .001) from 2011 to 2019, respectively. Median hospitalization for patients discharged on POD 2 to 6 was 4 days (interquartile range, 3 to 5 days). Patients' characteristics associated with a lower likelihood of POD 1 discharge were increasing age, smoking, or a history of dyspnea, whereas a minimally invasive approach was the strongest predictor of early discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 5.42; P < .001). Readmission rates were not significantly different for the POD 1 and POD 2 to 6 groups in univariate analysis (6.0% vs 7.0%; P = .269). Further, POD 1 discharge was not a risk factor for readmission in multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; P = .537). CONCLUSIONS Select patients can be discharged on POD 1 after lobectomy for lung cancer without an increased readmission risk, a finding supporting this accelerated discharge target inclusion in lobectomy enhanced recovery after surgery protocols.

The impact of concomitant lung resection during esophagectomy on short-term outcomes is not well characterized. This study tests the hypothesis that lung resection at the time of esophagectomy is not associated with increased perioperative morbidity or mortality.Perioperative outcomes for esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy alone (EA) were compared to patients who had concurrent esophagectomy and lung resection (EL) using the NSQIP database between 2006-2017. Predictors of morbidity and mortality, including combined surgery, were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.Among the 6,225 study patients, 6,068 (97.5%) underwent EA and 157 (2.5%) underwent EL. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Operating time for EL was longer than EA (median 416 versus 371 minutes, P0.01). Median length of stay was 10 d for both groups. Perioperative mortality was not significantly different between EL and EA patients (5.1% versus 2.8%, P = 0.08). EL patients had higher rates of postoperative pneumonia (22.3% versus 16.2%, P = 0.04) and sepsis (11.5% versus 7.1%, P = 0.03), however major complication rates overall were similar (40.8% versus 35.3%, P = 0.16). Combining lung resection with esophagectomy was not independently associated with increased postoperative morbidity (AOR 1.21 [95% CI 0.87-1.69]) or mortality (AOR 1.63 [95% CI 0.74-3.58]).Concurrent lung resection during esophagectomy is not associated with increased mortality or overall morbidity, but is associated with higher rates of pneumonia beyond esophagectomy alone. Surgeons considering combined lung resection with esophagectomy should carefully evaluate the patient's risk for pulmonary complications and pursue interventions preoperatively to optimize respiratory function.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition TNM staging manual for NSCLC, derived from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Staging Project, designates tumors with additional nodule(s) in the same lobe as T3. This study sought to externally validate the results of the IASLC, which showed a trend in improved survival for such tumors, but excluded treatment-based adjustment, by assessing whether these tumors have worse survival than T2b NSCLC.Overall survival of patients with T2b-T3, N0-3, M0 NSCLC (satisfying a single T descriptor of tumors4 cm but ≤5 cm in greatest dimension ["T2b"], tumors5 cm but ≤7 cm in greatest dimension ["T3-Size"], or tumors with additional nodule(s) in the same lobe ["T3-Add"]), according to the AJCC eighth edition, in the National Cancer Database (2010-2015), was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling and propensity score matching.31,563 patients with T2b-T3, N0-3, M0 NSCLC met the study inclusion criteria. In multivariable-adjusted analysis, T3-Add tumors had improved overall survival compared with T3-Size tumors (Hazard Ratio = 0.86, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.82-0.89, p0.001) and similar survival compared with T2b tumors (Hazard Ratio = 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.97-1.12, p = 0.28). A propensity score-matched analysis of 2260 T3-Add and 2,260 T2b patients, well-balanced on 16 common prognostic covariates, including treatment type (surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation), revealed similar 5-year survival (53.4% versus 52.3%, p = 0.30).In this national analysis, T3-Add tumors had better survival than other T3 tumors and similar survival to T2b tumors. These findings may be taken into consideration for the AJCC ninth edition staging classifications.

Diaphragm plication (DP) improves pulmonary function and quality of life for those with diaphragm paralysis or dysfunction. It is unknown whether differing degrees of diaphragm dysfunction as measured by sniff testing affect results after plication.Patients who underwent minimally invasive DP from 2008 to 2019 were dichotomized based on sniff test results: paradoxical motion (PM) versus no paradoxical motion (NPM); the latter included normal, decreased, and no motion. Preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function testing (PFT) after DP was compared between groups. The impact of the diaphragm height index, a measure of diaphragm elevation, was also assessed.A total of 26 patients underwent preoperative sniff testing, DP, and postoperative PFT. Including all patients, DP resulted in a 17.8% ± 5.5% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P.001), a 14.4% ± 5.3% improvement in forced vital capacity (P.001), and a 4.7% ± 4.6% improvement in the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (P = .539). There were greater improvements in the PM group (n = 16) compared with the NPM group (n = 10) for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (27.2% ± 6.0% versus 3.9% ± 6.2%; P = .017) and forced vital capacity (28.1% ± 5.3% versus -0.5% ± 3.3%; P = .001). There was no difference in the change in the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide between groups. There were no differences between patients with PM and NPM in the postoperative course or complications. No value for diaphragm height index predicted improvement in PFT after DP.Patients with PM on sniff test have dramatically greater objective improvements in pulmonary function after plication compared with those without PM. Most patients without PM do not demonstrate improvement in standard PFT. Improvements in dyspnea require additional study.

BACKGROUND A Medicare effect has been described to account for increased health care utilization occurring at the age of 65 years. The existence of such an effect in cancer care, where it would be most likely to reduce mortality, has been unclear. METHODS Patients aged 61 to 69 years who were diagnosed with lung, breast, colon, or prostate cancer from 2004 to 2016 were identified with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and were dichotomized on the basis of eligibility for Medicare (61-64 vs 65-69 years). With age-over-age (AoA) percent change calculations, trends in cancer diagnoses and staging were characterized. After matching, uninsured patients who were 61 to 64 years old (pre-Medicare group) were compared with insured patients who were 65 to 69 years old (post-Medicare group) with respect to cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS In all, 134,991 patients were identified with lung cancer, 175,558 were identified with breast cancer, 62,721 were identified with colon cancer, and 238,823 were identified with prostate cancer. The AoA growth in the number of cancer diagnoses was highest at the age of 65 years in comparison with all other ages within the decade for all 4 cancers (P < .01, P < .001, P < .01, and P < .001, respectively). In a comparison of diagnoses at the age of 65 years with those in the 61- to 64-year-old cohort, the greatest difference for all 4 cancers was seen in stage I. In matched analyses, the 5-year cancer-specific mortality was worse for lung (86.3% vs 78.5%; P < .001), breast (32.7% vs 11.0%; P < .001), colon (57.1% vs 35.6%; P < .001), and prostate cancer (16.9% vs 4.8%; P < .001) in the uninsured pre-Medicare group than the insured post-Medicare group. CONCLUSIONS The age threshold of 65 years for Medicare eligibility is associated with more cancer diagnoses (particularly stage I), and this results in lower long-term cancer-specific mortality for all cancers studied. LAY SUMMARY Contributing to the current debate regarding Medicare for all, this study shows that the expansion of Medicare would improve cancer outcomes for the near elderly.

Strong for Surgery (S4S) is a public health campaign focused on optimizing patient health prior to surgery by identifying evidence-based modifiable risk factors. The potential impact of S4S bundled risk factors on outcomes after major surgery has not been previously studied. This study tested the hypothesis that a higher number of S4S risk factors is associated with an escalating risk of complications and mortality after major elective surgery in the VA population. The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent major non-emergent general, thoracic, vascular, urologic, and orthopedic surgeries between the years 2008 and 2015. Patients with complete data pertaining to S4S risk factors, specifically preoperative smoking status, HbA1c level, and serum albumin level, were stratified by number of positive risk factors, and perioperative outcomes were compared. A total of 31,285 patients comprised the study group, with 16,630 (53.2%) patients having no S4S risk factors (S4S0), 12,323 (39.4%) having one (S4S1), 2,186 (7.0%) having two (S4S2), and 146 (0.5%) having three (S4S3). In the S4S1 group, 60.3% were actively smoking, 35.2% had HbA1c > 7, and 4.4% had serum albumin 7, and 27.4% had albumin

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of extended delay to surgery for stage I NSCLC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with NSCLC may experience delays in care, and some national guidelines recommend delays in surgery by >3 months for early NSCLC. METHODS: Using data from the National Lung Screening Trial, a multi-center randomized trial, and the National Cancer Data Base, a multi-institutional oncology registry, the impact of "early" versus "delayed" surgery (surgery received 0-30 vs 90-120 days after diagnosis) for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was assessed using multivariable Cox regression analysis with penalized smoothing spline functions and propensity score-matched analyses. RESULTS: In Cox regression analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial (n = 452) and National Cancer Data Base (n = 80,086) cohorts, an increase in the hazard ratio was seen the longer surgery was delayed. In propensity score-matched analysis, no significant differences in survival were found between early and delayed surgery for stage IA1 adenocarcinoma and IA1-IA3 SCC (all P > 0.13). For stage IA2-IB adenocarcinoma and IB SCC, delayed surgery was associated with worse survival (all P < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality risk associated with an extended delay to surgery differs across patient subgroups, and difficult decisions to delay care during the COVID-19 pandemic should take substage and histologic subtype into consideration.

BACKGROUND: Tumor size of 8 cm or greater is a risk factor for recurrence after thymoma resection, but the role of induction therapy for large thymomas is not well defined. This study tested the hypothesis that induction therapy for thymomas 8 cm and larger improves survival. METHODS: The use of induction therapy for patients treated with surgical resection for Masaoka stage I–III thymomas in the National Cancer Database between 2006–2013 was evaluated using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox-proportional hazards methods. RESULTS: Of the 1,849 patients who met inclusion criteria, 582 (31.5%) had tumors ≥8 cm. Five-year survival was worse in patients with tumors ≥8 cm compared to smaller tumors [84.6% (95% CI: 81.2–88.1%) vs. 89.4% (95% CI: 87.2–91.7%), P=0.003]. Induction therapy was used in 166 (9.0%) patients overall and was more likely in patients with tumors ≥8 cm [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.257, P

OBJECTIVES Sublobar resection is increasingly being utilized for early-stage lung cancers, but optimal management when final pathology shows unsuspected mediastinal nodal disease is unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that lobectomy has improved survival compared to sublobar resection for clinical stage IA tumours with occult N2 disease. METHODS The use of sublobar resection and lobectomy for patients in the National Cancer Database who underwent primary surgical resection for clinical stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer with pathologic N2 disease between 2010 and 2017 was evaluated using logistic regression. Survival was assessed with Kaplan–Meier analysis, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS A total of 2419 patients comprised the study cohort, including 320 sublobar resections (13.2%) and 2099 lobectomies (86.8%). Older age, female sex, smaller tumour size and treatment at an academic facility predicted the use of sublobar resection. Patients undergoing lobectomy had larger tumours (2.40 vs 2.05 cm, P CONCLUSIONS Clinical stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer patients with N2 disease on final pathology have similar long-term survival with either sublobar resection or lobectomy. Patients with occult N2 disease after sublobar resection may not require reoperation for completion lobectomy but should instead proceed to adjuvant chemotherapy.

The sensitivity of fluoroscopic esophagography with oral administration of contrast material to exclude anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is not well documented, and the consequences of missing a leak in this setting have not been previously described.We performed a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained institutional database of patients undergoing esophagectomy with esophagogastric anastomosis from 2008 to 2020. Relevant details of leaks, management, and outcomes were obtained from the database and formal chart review. Statistical analysis was performed to compare patients with and without leaks and those with false-negative vs positive esophagrams.There were 384 patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction; the majority were Ivor-Lewis (82%), and 51% were wholly or partially minimally invasive. By use of a broad definition of leak, 55 patients (16.7%) developed an anastomotic leak. Of the 55 patients, 27 (49%) who ultimately were found to have a leak initially had a normal esophagram result (performed on average on postoperative day 6). Those with a normal initial esophagram result were more likely to have an uncontained leak (81% vs 29%; P.01), to require unplanned readmission (70% vs 39%; P = .02), and to undergo reoperation (44% vs 11%; P.01).Early postoperative esophagrams intended to evaluate anastomotic integrity have a low sensitivity of 51%, and leaks missed on the initial esophagram have greater clinical consequences than those identified on the initial esophagram. These findings suggest that a high index of suspicion must be maintained even after a normal esophagram result and call into question the common practice of using this test to triage patients for diet advancement.

BACKGROUND: The role of lung resection in patients with pulmonary aspergillosis is generally reserved for those with localized disease who fail medical management. We used a national database to investigate the influence of preoperative patient comorbidities on inpatient mortality and need for surgery. METHODS: Patients admitted with pulmonary aspergillosis between 2007 to 2015 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample dataset. Inpatient mortality rates were compared between patients treated medically and surgically. Predictors of mortality, surgical intervention, and non-elective admission were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among a population estimate of 112,998 patients with pulmonary aspergillosis, 107,606 (95.2%) underwent medical management alone and 5,392 (4.8%) underwent surgical resection. Positive predictors for surgery included hemoptysis, and history of lung cancer or chronic pulmonary diseases. Surgically treated patients had a lower inpatient mortality when compared to those treated medically (11.5% vs. 15.1%, P

As the world responds to the global crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic an increasing number of patients are experiencing increased morbidity as a result of multi-organ involvement. Of these, a small proportion will progress to end-stage lung disease, become dialysis dependent, or both. Herein, we describe the first reported case of a successful combined lung and kidney transplantation in a patient with COVID-19. Lung transplantation, isolated or combined with other organs, is feasible and should be considered for select patients impacted by this deadly disease.

We sought to develop and evaluate a personalized multimedia education (ME) tool for preoperative patient education to improve patient health knowledge, quality of life and satisfaction with care in thoracic surgery. The ME tool was developed and deployed in outpatient clinic during preoperative teaching for patients undergoing surgical resection for lung cancer for quality improvement. Patients were given an electronic survey prior to preoperative teaching and at initial postoperative visit to assess teaching effectiveness and care satisfaction. Sequential patients received either standard preoperative teaching or teaching using the ME tool. Pre- and postoperative survey responses were compared using independent sample paired t test and multivariable linear regression modeling for adjustment. The final ME tool was an iPad application that incorporated real-time annotations of 3-dimensional, interactive anatomic diagrams. The tool featured video tours of operations, and radiology image import for annotation by the surgeon. Forty-eight patients were included in this pilot study (standard education n = 26; ME, n = 22). ME patients had significantly higher satisfaction scores compared to SE patients with respect to length of education materials, clarity of content, supportiveness of content and willingness to recommend materials to others. There was no difference in length of clinic visit between groups. Both patient and provider input can be used to create an innovative electronic preoperative educational tool that prepares and empowers patients in shared decision-making before surgery. Improvements in health literacy and self-efficacy may be more difficult to achieve but remain important as multimedia teaching tools are further developed.

The eighth edition of the staging manual for non-small cell lung cancer reclassified tumors7 cm as stage IIIA (T4 N0); previously, such tumors without nodal disease were considered stage IIB (T3 N0). This study tested the hypothesis that induction chemotherapy for these stage IIIA patients does not improve survival compared with primary surgery.The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-small cell lung cancer with tumor size7 cm who underwent surgical resection from 2010 to 2015. Patients with clinically node-positive disease or tumor invasion of major structures were excluded. Patients undergoing induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection (IC group) were compared with patients undergoing primary surgery (PS group). Propensity score matching was performed.In total, 1610 patients with cT4 N0 disease on the basis of tumor size7 cm and no tumor invasion underwent surgical resection: 1346 (83.6%) comprised the PS group and 264 (16.4%) the IC group. After propensity score matching, the IC group had a higher rate of pN0 (78.4% vs 66.0%; P.001) and less lymphovascular invasion (13.9% vs 26.3%; P .001), but longer postoperative stays (6 days vs 5 days; P.001) and higher 30-day mortality (3.5% vs 0%; P = .002). Median 5-year survival was similar between the IC and PS groups (53.5% vs 62.2%; P = .075), and IC was not independently associated with survival (hazard ratio, 1.45; P = .146).Patients with cT4 N0 non-small cell lung cancer on the basis of tumor size7 cm and no tumor invasion of major structures have similar overall survival with either induction chemotherapy or primary surgery. Induction chemotherapy should not be routinely given for this subset of stage IIIA patients.

Strong for Surgery (S4S) is a public health campaign focused on optimizing patient health prior to surgery by identifying evidence-based modifiable risk factors. The potential impact of S4S bundled risk factors on outcomes after major surgery has not been previously studied. This study tested the hypothesis that a higher number of S4S risk factors is associated with an escalating risk of complications and mortality after major elective surgery in the VA population.The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent major non-emergent general, thoracic, vascular, urologic, and orthopedic surgeries between the years 2008 and 2015. Patients with complete data pertaining to S4S risk factors, specifically preoperative smoking status, HbA1c level, and serum albumin level, were stratified by number of positive risk factors, and perioperative outcomes were compared.A total of 31,285 patients comprised the study group, with 16,630 (53.2%) patients having no S4S risk factors (S4S0), 12,323 (39.4%) having one (S4S1), 2,186 (7.0%) having two (S4S2), and 146 (0.5%) having three (S4S3). In the S4S1 group, 60.3% were actively smoking, 35.2% had HbA1c 7, and 4.4% had serum albumin 3. In the S4S2 group, 87.8% were smokers, 84.8% had HbA1c 7, and 27.4% had albumin 3. Major complications, reoperations, length of stay, and 30-day mortality increased progressively from S4S0 to S4S3 groups. S4S3 had the greatest adjusted mortality risk (adjusted odds radio [AOR] 2.56, p = 0.04) followed by S4S2 (AOR 1.58, p = 0.02) and S4S1 (AOR 1.34, p = 0.02).In the VA population, patients who had all three S4S risk factors, namely active smoking, suboptimal nutritional status, and poor glycemic control, had the greatest risk of postoperative mortality compared to patients with fewer S4S risk factors.

This study investigated the influence of facility volume on long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer treated with esophagectomy.Patients treated with esophagectomy for cT1 3N0 3M0 adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the mid-distal esophagus in the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2013 were stratified by annual facility esophagectomy volume dichotomized as more/less than both 6 and 20. Patient characteristics associated with facility volume were evaluated using logistic regression, and the influence of facility volume on survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards methods, and propensity matched analysis.Of 11,739 patients who had esophagectomy at 1018 facilities where annual volume ranged from 1 to 47.6 cases, 4262 (36.3%) were treated at 44 facilities with annual esophagectomy volume 6 and 1515 (12.9%) were treated at 7 facilities with annual volume 20. Higher volume was associated with significantly better 5-year survival for both annual volume6 (47.6% vs 40.2%; P .001) and annual volume 20 (47.2% vs 42.3%; P .001), which persisted in propensity matched analyses as well as Cox multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.89; P .001 for facility volume 6 and hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.95; P = .01 for facility volume 20). In Cox multivariable analysis that considered facility volume as a continuous variable, higher volume continued to be associated with better survival (hazard ratio, 0.93 per 5 cases; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96; P .001).Esophageal cancer patients treated with esophagectomy at higher volume facilities have significantly better long-term survival than patients treated at lower volume facilities.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate practice patterns and outcomes for patients 80 years or older with esophageal cancer using a nationwide cancer data base. Practice patterns for patients 80 years or older with stage I-IV esophageal cancer in the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2014 were analyzed. Overall survival associated with different treatment strategies were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. In the study period, 40.5% and 46.2% of patients with stage I adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, respectively, did not receive any treatment at all. Less than 11% (196/1,865) of patients with stage I-II disease underwent esophagectomy, even though surgery was associated with a better 5-year survival compared to no treatment (stage I: 47.3% [95% confidence interval [CI] 36.2–57.6%] vs 14.9% [95% CI: 11.2–19.1%]; stage II: 29.3% [95% CI 20.1–39.1%] vs 1.2% [95% CI: 0.1–5.5%]). Of the 1,596 (37.7%) patients with stage III disease who received curative-intent treatment (surgery or chemoradiation), the 5-year survival was significantly better than that of patients who received no treatment (11.9% [95% CI: 9.7–14.4% vs 4.3% [95% CI: 1.9–8.3%]). In this national analysis of patients 80 years and older with esophageal cancer, over 40% of patients with stage I disease did not receive treatment. Patients with stage I-III disease had better survival and risks and benefits of treatment for elderly patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting.

BACKGROUND: Asian and Caucasian patients with lung cancer have been compared in several database studies, with conflicting findings regarding survival. However, these studies did not include proportion of ground-glass opacity or mutational status in their analyses. Asian patients commonly develop sub-solid lung adenocarcinomas that harbor EGFR mutations, which have a better prognosis. We hypothesized that among patients undergoing surgery for sub-solid lung adenocarcinomas, Asian patients have better survival compared to Caucasian patients. METHODS: We identified Asian and Caucasian patients who underwent surgical resection for a sub-solid lung adenocarcinoma from 2002 to 2015 at our institution. Sub-solid was defined as ≥10% ground-glass opacity on preoperative CT scan or ≥10% lepidic component on surgical pathology. Time-to-event multivariable analysis was performed to determine which characteristics were associated with recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-four patients were included with median follow up 48 months. Asian patients were more likely to be never smokers (76.3% vs. 29.0%, P

The study of human factors has become a considerable focus in the field of thoracic surgery, given the complex nature of operations, multidisciplinary teams necessary in many clinical scenarios, and the constantly evolving technology incorporated into patient care. The degree of coordination necessary for routine thoracic surgery care makes it imperative to analyze the system and ensure communication among team members is concise and efficient. This chapter begins with a case study outlining a scenario encountered in a relatively common general thoracic surgery case, followed by a review of current human factors research and insights.

The obesity epidemic in the United States has increased greatly over the past several decades, and thoracic surgeons are likely to see obese patients routinely in their practices. Obesity has direct deleterious health effects such as metabolic disorder and cardiovascular disease, and is associated with many cancers. Obese patients who need thoracic surgery pose practical challenges to many of the routine elements in perioperative management. Preoperative assessment of obesity-related comorbid conditions and risk stratification for surgery, thorough intraoperative planning for anesthesia and surgery, and postoperative strategies to optimize pulmonary hygiene and mobility minimize the risk of adverse outcomes.

The oncologic efficacy of minimally invasive thymectomy for thymoma is not well characterized. We compared short-term outcomes and overall survival between open and minimally invasive (video-assisted thoracoscopic and robotic) approaches using the National Cancer Data Base.Perioperative outcomes and survival of patients who underwent open versus minimally invasive thymectomy for clinical stage I to III thymoma from 2010 to 2014 in the National Cancer Data Base were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling and propensity score-matched analysis. Predictors of minimally invasive use were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes of surgical approach were evaluated using an intent-to-treat analysis.Of the 1223 thymectomies that were evaluated, 317 (26%) were performed minimally invasively (141 video-assisted thoracoscopic and 176 robotic). The minimally invasive group had a shorter median length of stay when compared with the open group (3 [2-4] days vs 4 [3-6] days, P .001). In a propensity score-matched analysis of 185 open and 185 minimally invasive (video-assisted thoracoscopic + robotic) thymectomy, the minimally invasive group continued to have a shorter median length of stay (3 vs 4 days, P .01) but did not have significant differences in margin positivity (P = .84), 30-day readmission (P = .28), 30-day mortality (P = .60), and 5-year survival (89.4% vs 81.6%, P = .20) when compared with the open group.In this national analysis, minimally invasive thymectomy was associated with shorter length of stay and was not associated with increased margin positivity, perioperative mortality, 30-day readmission rate, or reduced overall survival when compared with open thymectomy.

8537 Background: Five-year survival for stage I-II lung cancer is quite low even after complete surgical resection. Current guidelines recommend adjuvant treatment only for selected patients with stage II or higher disease. A prediction model that identifies patients at high risk of recurrence who may benefit from adjuvant treatment is greatly needed. Many existing prediction models include a small number of genes that were found to be significant in previous studies. We propose using artificial intelligence to analyze a microarray of > 20,000 well-annotated genes to create a model that predicts recurrence after surgical resection of stage I-II lung cancer. Methods: We identified 275 patients who underwent surgical resection for pathologic stage I-II lung adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma from 2009 to 2019 in our institution’s prospective surgical database. We excluded patients who had follow up time less than 3 years or received adjuvant therapy and had not had a recurrence, as well as patients with missing specimen blocks. Patient characteristics and recurrence information were obtained from chart review. The patients were divided into training (192 patients) and validation (83 patients) cohorts, and the recurrence status for the validation cohort was initially blinded. Gene expression levels were generated using Clariom S human array (ThermoFisher) from 10um sections cut from the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded surgical specimen blocks. The artificial intelligence algorithm Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to create a prediction model for recurrence using the gene expression and recurrence status of the patients in the training cohort. The model was then tested on the validation cohort using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC). Results: The recurrence prediction model separated the validation cohort into 15 (18.1%) patients in the high-risk group and 68 (81.9%) patients in the low-risk group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the five-year disease-free survival was significantly higher in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group (86 vs. 50%, HR = 4.41, p = 0.0025). The AUROC for predicting recurrence was 0.744. Conclusions: Our model uses artificial intelligence to successfully predict recurrence after surgical resection for stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer. With an AUROC of 0.744, our model outperforms previously described models with AUROC up to 0.6. Our model separates patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, which will make management decisions clearer compared to other models that also include an intermediate-risk group. Patients in the low-risk group had 86% five-year disease-free survival; patients in the high-risk group had 50% five-year disease-free survival and may benefit from increased postoperative surveillance or adjuvant therapy.

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are commonly managed with either pleural catheter (PC) or talc pleurodesis (TP). The aim of this study was to compare survival in MPE patients treated with either PC or TP. A retrospective review of our cancer center database was performed. Patients with metastatic cancer and MPE were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were tabulated and compared. A total of 238 patients with MPE treated by either PC or TP were included. Of these, 79 patients comprised the PC group and 159 the TP group. PC had a higher incidence of advanced disease (stage III or IV) at initial diagnosis compared with TP (70.9% vs 57.2%, P = 0.05). TP had a longer postprocedure length of stay compared with PC (7.1 vs 5.0 days, P = 0.02); however, overall length of stay was similar (9.7 vs 11.1 days, P = 0.34). Read-missions were significantly lower in TP (11.9% vs 22.8%, P = 0.04). Mean survival was higher in TP compared with PC (18.7 vs 4.1 months, P < 0.001). Patients with metastatic cancer and MPE treated with TP had significantly higher survival compared with PC. This is likely related to a greater disease burden in PC, as 70 per cent of patients in this group had stage III or IV disease on initial presentation.

Many patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) end up receiving a combined liver and kidney transplant (CKLT) with preservation of native kidneys, specially type 1 HRS since is characterizes by a very rapid deterioration of renal function. Eventually, most of the patients regain renal function, but it is unknown if this is due to the transplanted kidney, the recovery of native renal function, or both. The aim of this study is to evaluate if there is recovery of native renal function in patients with HRS following CKLT. 22 patients (16 men; 6 women) with history of HRS and status post CKLT were studied. Mercapto-acetyltriglycine-3 renograms in the anterior and posterior views with the three kidneys in the field of view were simultaneously acquired. The renograms were analyzed by creating regions of interest around the transplanted and native kidneys. Relative contribution to the renal function, clearance, and effective renal plasma flow for the transplanted and native kidneys were obtained. 1/22 (4.5%) patients presented with a very poor functioning transplanted kidney, in 15/22 (68%) cases the combined native renal function was markedly poorer than the transplanted renal function and in 6/22 (27%) native kidneys showed a contribution to the renal function similar to the transplanted kidney. In conclusion, our series show that around 32% of the HRS patients recovered their native renal function after CKLT. Identification of common factors that affect recovery of native renal function may help to avoid unnecessary renal transplants, significantly reducing morbidity and cost, while facilitating a reallocation of scarce donor resources.

The effect of resident duty hour restrictions continues to yield conflicting results on patient outcomes. Failure to rescue (FTR), or death after a major complication, has become a topic of increasing quality assessment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of duty hour restrictions on in-hospital mortality, complication rates, and FTR in patients suffering traumatic injuries.Data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) were retrospectively reviewed (Research Data Set 2007-2008 and version 7.2). Patients admitted to Level I or II teaching institutions were dichotomized into pre-duty hour restriction (2002-2003) and post-duty hour restriction (2007-2008) time periods. Patients who had nonsurvivable injuries (any region Abbreviated Injury Scale score = 6), died within 48 hours, or had missing data were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for differences in patient characteristics and derive adjusted outcomes.Level I and II teaching institutions in the NTDB.All patients with trauma admitted to a Level I or II teaching institution between January 1, 2002 and June 30, 2003 and between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2008.Although overall adjusted in-hospital mortality was decreased (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.7, p0.001) in the post-duty hour restriction era, overall complications (AOR = 2.0, p0.001) and FTR (AOR = 2.0, p0.001) were significantly higher.Although there may be some benefit to resident duty hour restrictions, there is still room for improvement in patient care. Individual institutions should carefully review their own complication data to identify preventable systems issues, such as poor handoffs, and opportunities for increased resident supervision.

2015 Background: A “Medicare effect” has been described to account for increased health care utilization occurring at the age of 65, when individuals become eligible for government-sponsored health care. The existence of such an effect in cancer care, where it would be most likely to reduce mortality, has been unclear. Methods: Patients aged 61-69 diagnosed with lung, breast, colon, or prostate cancer from 2004-2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and dichotomized based on eligibility for Medicare (age 61-64 vs 65-69). Using age-over-age percent change calculations, trends in cancer diagnosis, AJCC staging, and survival were characterized. Results: 134,991 patients were identified with lung cancer; 175,558 with breast; 62,721 with colon; and 238,823 with prostate. The age-over-age growth in the number of cancer diagnoses was highest at age 65 when compared to all other ages within the decade, for all four cancers (Table: p

Objective Data regarding the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are mixed. We hypothesized HRT would have a protective benefit with reduced NSCLC incidence among women in a large, prospective cohort. Methods We used data from the multicenter randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (1993-2001). Participants were women aged 50 to 74 years followed prospectively for up to 13 years for cancer screening. The influence of HRT on the primary outcome of NSCLC incidence and secondary outcomes of all-cause and disease-specific mortality were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for covariates. Results In the overall cohort of 75,587 women, 1147 women developed NSCLC after a median follow-up of 11.5 years. HRT use was characterized as 49.4% current users, 17.0% former users, and 33.6% never users. Increased age, smoking, comorbidities, and family history were associated with increased risk of NSCLC. On multivariable analysis, current HRT use was associated with reduced risk of NSCLC compared with never users (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.93; P = .009). HRT or oral contraception use was not associated with significant differences in all-cause mortality or disease-specific mortality. Conclusions These data represent among the largest prospective cohorts suggesting HRT use may have a protective effect on the development of NSCLC among women; the physiological basis of this effect merits further study; however, the results may influence discussion surrounding HRT use in women.