Search

The significance of the inter-relationship between tumour and host local/systemic inflammatory responses in primary operable invasive breast cancer is limited. The inter-relationship between the systemic inflammatory response (pre-operative white cell count, C-reactive protein and albumin concentrations), standard clinicopathological factors, tumour T-lymphocytic (CD4+ and CD8+) and macrophage (CD68+) infiltration, proliferative (Ki-67) index and microvessel density (CD34+) was examined using immunohistochemistry and slide-counting techniques, and their prognostic values were examined in 168 patients with potentially curative resection of early-stage invasive breast cancer. Increased tumour grade and proliferative activity were associated with greater tumour T-lymphocyte (P<0.05) and macrophage (P<0.05) infiltration and microvessel density (P<0.01). The median follow-up of survivors was 72 months. During this period, 31 patients died; 18 died of their cancer. On univariate analysis, increased lymph-node involvement (P<0.01), negative hormonal receptor (P<0.10), lower albumin concentrations (P<0.01), increased tumour proliferation (P<0.05), increased tumour microvessel density (P<0.05), the extent of locoregional control (P<0.0001) and limited systemic treatment (P0.01) were associated with cancer-specific survival. On multivariate analysis of these significant covariates, albumin (HR 4.77, 95% CI 1.35–16.85, P=0.015), locoregional treatment (HR 3.64, 95% CI 1.04–12.72, P=0.043) and systemic treatment (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.23–4.27, P=0.009) were significant independent predictors of cancer-specific survival. Among tumour-based inflammatory factors, only tumour microvessel density (P<0.05) was independently associated with poorer cancer-specific survival. The host inflammatory responses are closely associated with poor tumour differentiation, proliferation and malignant disease progression in breast cancer.British Journal of Cancer (2008) 99, 1013–1019. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604667 www.bjcancer.com Published online 16 September 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prediction of outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer remains problematical. The present study evaluated the value of an inflammation-based score (Glasgow Prognostic Score, GPS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The GPS was constructed as follows: patients with both an elevated C-reactive protein (>10 mg l(-1)) and hypoalbuminaemia (<35 g l(-1)) were allocated a score of 2. Patients in whom only one or none of these biochemical abnormalities was present were allocated a score of 1 or 0, respectively. In total, 96 patients were studied. During follow-up 51 patients died of their cancer. On multivariate analysis of the GPS and treatment received, only the GPS (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.45-3.52, P<0.001) remained significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. The presence of a systemic inflammatory response (the GPS) appears to be a useful indicator of poor outcome independent of treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The extent of deprivation (Carstairs deprivation index) was directly associated with the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response (reduced albumin and elevated C-reactive protein, P<0.01) in patients with primary operable breast cancer (n=314). Deprivation was not associated with age, tumour size, tumour type, grade, and the proportion of patients with involved lymph nodes and oestrogen receptor status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Support for the oncological safety of oncoplastic breast conservation surgery (OBCS) is mostly based on evidence comparing recurrence rates after OBCS to wide local excision (WLE). However, OBCS is often indicated for larger cancers and oncological results should also be compared to patients treated with mastectomy. In this study we compared recurrence and survival following OBCS, mastectomy and WLE., Methods: Patients treated with OBCS between 2009 and 2012 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. For comparison, consecutive patients treated with WLE or mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction (Ms ± IR) over the same time period were identified. Histological variables of patients were compared using Fisher Exact or Chi squared tests, and recurrence and survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analysis., Results: 980 patients' data were analysed (OBCS: n = 104; WLE: n = 558; Ms ± IR: n = 318). Tumour size, grade, nodal status, ER, and PR expression of patients treated with OBCS were all significantly more adverse compared with patients treated with WLE (p < 0.001). These histological variables were similar in patients treated with Ms ± IR and OBCS. 5-year local recurrence rates were similar in all three groups (WLE: 3.4 per cent, OBCS: 2 per cent, Ms ± IR: 2.6 per cent; log rank = 0.973), while distant recurrence rates were higher after Ms ± IR and OBCS (Ms ± IR:13.1 per cent, OBCS:7.5 per cent, WLE:3.3 per cent; log rank: p < 0.001)., Conclusion: OBCS is oncologically safe in patients even when histological results are similar to patients treated with Ms ± IR., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Comparative studies suggest that patients treated with oncoplastic breast conservation surgery (OBCS) have similar pathology to patients treated with wide local excision (WLE). However, patients treated with OBCS have never been compared to patients treated with mastectomy. The aim of this study was to identify which control group was comparable to patients undergoing OBCS., Methods: Commonly reported histopathological variables of patients treated with OBCS, WLE or mastectomy ± immediate reconstruction (Ms ± IR) were compared using Fisher Exact or Chi squared tests., Results: 1000 patients' data were analysed (OBCS: n = 119; WLE: n = 600; Ms ± IR: n = 281). Tumour size was significantly bigger after OBCS than WLE (p < 0.001), but similar to Ms ± IR (p = 0.138). Tumour grade was higher after OBCS than WLE (p < 0.001), but similar to Ms ± IR (p = 0.497). More axillary nodes were involved in patients with OBCS than WLE (p < 0.001), but comparable to Ms ± IR (p = 0.175). ER and PR expressions were lower after OBCS compared to WLE (p = 0.007, p = 0.009), but identical to Ms ± IR (p = 1, p = 0.904 respectively). Differences in application of systemic (neo)adjuvant therapy followed the above trend., Conclusion: Striking similarities found between OBCS and mastectomy patients' histopathological results are in sharp contrast with previously published data. This study suggests that oncological outcomes following OBCS should be compared to mastectomy besides WLE., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this systematic review was to establish the completeness of reporting of key patient, tumour, treatment, and outcomes information in the randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) of standard breast-conserving surgery (sBCS) considered to be the 'gold-standard', and to compare this with the reporting of the same key criteria for all published studies of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (oBCS). Pubmed (1966 to 1st April 2013), Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to 1st April 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 1st April 2013), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 4, 2013) were searched separately for the following terms: (i) 'oncoplastic AND breast AND surgery'; and (ii) 'therapeutic AND mammaplasty'. Only English language and full text articles were reviewed. Following a pilot evaluation of all studies, key reporting criteria were identified. 16 RCTs of sBCS (n = 11,767 patients) were included, and 53 studies met the inclusion criteria for oncoplastic BCS (n = 3236 patients), none of which were RCTs. No study reported all of the criteria identified, with a mean of 64% of key criteria (range, 55-75%) reported in studies of sBCS, and 54% of criteria (range, 10-85%) reported in studies of oBCS. It is therefore evident that there is much room for improvement in the quality of reporting is BCS studies. Standards are proposed to give future studies of BCS a framework for reporting key information and outcomes., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Mastectomy for breast cancer in men typically results in an unsatisfactory aesthetic appearance due to loss of the normal male chest contour. In this article we present two case studies and a new oncoplastic surgical technique that has given excellent aesthetic results for this challenging problem., (Copyright © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The use of local boost radiotherapy to the tumour bed has been demonstrated in randomised-controlled trials to reduce local recurrence rates following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and is the standard of care. Oncoplastic BCS techniques with parenchymal rearrangement present new challenges to the localisation of the tumour bed and therefore delivery of local boost radiotherapy. The aim of this review was to evaluate the reporting of boost radiotherapy in the oncoplastic BCS literature., Methods: Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for studies reporting oncoplastic BCS using volume displacement techniques., Results: 24 studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 1933 patients). Use of boost radiotherapy was reported in 11 studies, in 2 of which it was for the treatment of incomplete or close margins, and marking of the tumour bed was only reported in 8 studies. None of the studies reported the number of patients where the tumour bed could not be localised., Conclusions: The use of local boost radiotherapy and tumour bed marking was not reported in the majority of studies of oncoplastic BCS. Future studies need to provide detailed information regarding the use of boost radiotherapy and difficulties determining the target volume so that current radiotherapy approaches can be reviewed and improved for these advanced techniques., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: There is hardly any evidence that oncoplastic breast conservation surgery (OBCS) does not lead to a delay in the commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy. Although this is an integral part of overall oncological safety, no controlled studies have been published so far. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether OBCS led to a delay when compared to simple wide local excision (WLE), mastectomy (Ms) or mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (MsIR)., Methods: Breast cancer patients who required adjuvant chemotherapy after OBCS, WLE, Ms and MsIR were identified from prospectively maintained institutional databases. Time between multidisciplinary team decision to offer chemotherapy and delivery of first cycle of chemotherapy was measured and compared among the four groups of patients., Results: time to chemotherapy of breast cancer patients (n = 169) treated with OBCS (n = 31) were 29 [16-58] days, while it was 29.5 [15-105] days after WLE (n = 66), 29 [15-57] days after Ms (n = 56) and 31 [15-58] days after MsIR (n = 16). A combined analysis involving all four groups demonstrated no statistically significant difference (p = 0.524). Similarly, inter-group analysis revealed no significant differences in between patients treated with OBCS compared to any of the three control groups (OBCS to WLE: p = 0.433; OBCS to Ms: p = 0.800; OBCS to MsIR: p = 0.405)., Conclusion: OBCS seems as safe as WLE, Ms or MsIR in terms of delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy, and, therefore, should not adversely affect breast cancer outcome in this respect., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients treated surgically for early breast cancer show a peak recurrence 2 years following surgery. Distant metastases are the most common recurrence event and are associated with an increased risk of dying from breast cancer within 5 years. Consequently, reducing the risk of distant metastases is an important therapeutic goal. The use of an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as initial adjuvant therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of early recurrence. The Breast International Group 1-98 primary core analysis demonstrated that letrozole is the only AI in the initial adjuvant setting to demonstrate a significant 27% reduction in early distant metastases at 25.8 months in hormone receptor-positive patients. Once patients are diagnosed with distant metastases, they have incurable disease. Developing endocrine therapies to reduce the risk of distant metastases is, therefore, critically important therapeutic goal., ((c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has been considered by some to lead to a delay in the delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy. Our aim was to determine whether IBR led to a delay when compared to conservation surgery and non-reconstructive mastectomy. Ninety-five cases of IBR receiving chemotherapy were reviewed. These were compared to 95 consecutively treated patients undergoing conservation surgery and 95 undergoing non-reconstructive mastectomy. Our data shows that IBR does not lead to a delay in the delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy when compared to standard non-reconstructive surgery and should not adversely affect breast cancer outcome.

Fifty patients with locally advanced breast cancer received regional chemotherapy delivered angiographically via the internal mammary artery and varying vessels supplying the lateral aspect of the breast. Thirty three patients received mitomycin C, methotrexate and mitoxantrone, and 17 patients received methotrexate and mitoxantrone only. There was no significant difference in clinical response between the two groups. However, in patients who received mitomycin C, severe local skin toxicity occurred in nine patients resulting in delay of further therapy and considerable morbidity. Mitomycin C should not be administered regionally in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Breast infection is now much less common than it used to be. It most commonly occurs in women in the 18 to 50 age group, and can be divided into lactational and non-lactational infection. The most common causative organism is Staphylococcus aureus, although enterococci and Anaerobic streptococci are also seen in non-lactational infection. An unusual case is reported with a new aetiology for breast sepsis.

Objective: To investigate the current practice of chemical lumbar sympathectomy by vascular surgeons in Scotland., Design and Subjects: Postal questionnaire survey of all practising vascular surgeons in Scotland (n = 40) identified from the list of members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland., Results: Most surgeons (30 of the 34 respondents, 88%) practise chemical lumbar sympathectomy. Their main indications are in line with current recommendations in relevant publications. Controversial areas include its use as an adjunct to operation and in treating diabetic feet. The procedure is done by vascular surgeons (16 of 34 respondents, 47%) and anaesthetists or radiologists (14 of the 34 respondents, 41%). There is a wide variation in the technical aspects of the procedure. All respondents make a clinical assessment of outcome., Conclusion: The role of chemical lumbar sympathectomy is likely to remain controversial because of the lack of a valid prognostic marker, technical variability, and the fact that it is often used in elderly patients.

Injury to the vagus nerve or one of its branches during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can result in vocal fold paralysis (VFP). This study assessed prospectively 73 patients undergoing CEA. A total of 76 procedures were performed in these patients over a one-year period. All patients underwent pre-operative and post-operative assessment of vocal fold mobility by indirect laryngoscopy and/or flexible nasendoscopy. All patients had normal vocal fold mobility pre-operatively. Eight patients (10 per cent) complained of hoarseness after surgery and in three patients (four per cent) examination confirmed an ipsilateral VFP. This persists in all three patients at six-month follow-up. Vocal fold assessment is important in patients undergoing CEA, particularly when performing second side surgery. We recommend that patients should be informed of the risk of VFP following CEA when obtaining consent.

The outlook for patients with colorectal liver metastases remains poor, survival in our hospital being only 6 months. The results of conventional treatment are disappointing. With the advent of implantable silicone catheters and small portable pumps, regional chemotherapy is more frequently administered, although complications relating to the catheter do occur. We describe a patient who expelled his hepatic artery catheter rectally, following removal of the catheter port for sepsis.