1. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse—the preferred procedure for the unfit elderly patient? 10 years experience from a UK tertiary centre
- Author
-
Dorin Ziyaie, S. M. P. Koch, S. R. Knight, M. Alwahid, Kenneth Campbell, and H. Wadhawan
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Constipation ,Frail Elderly ,Health Status ,Perineum ,Tertiary Care Centers ,Age ,Colon, Sigmoid ,Recurrence ,Anesthesiology ,medicine ,Humans ,Perineal rectosigmoidectomy ,Fecal incontinence ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Rectal prolapse ,Proctectomy ,business.industry ,Gastroenterology ,Length of Stay ,medicine.disease ,Symptomatic relief ,United Kingdom ,Colorectal surgery ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Cohort ,Altemeier ,Female ,Original Article ,Symptom Assessment ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Fecal Incontinence ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
Background Rectal prolapse is a disease presentation with a prevalence of about 1%, mainly affecting older women. It usually presents with symptoms of rectal mass, rectal bleeding, fecal incontinence or constipation, with patients frequently feeling socially isolated as a result. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy is associated with lesser morbidity and mortality than the abdominal procedure, but with a much higher recurrence rate. Therefore, this technique is mainly suitable for the frail elderly patient. Specific outcomes in an elderly population have been described in only a few studies. We evaluated the morbidity, mortality, recurrence rate and functional results after this procedure related to age. Methods All patients who underwent a perineal rectosigmoidectomy over a 10-year period in two tertiary referral centers were included in the study. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade, pre- and postoperative symptoms, pathology-reported post-fixation specimen length, length of in-patient stay, 30-day morbidity/mortality, and recurrence were measured. Results A total of 45 patients underwent a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. Forty-three (95%) were female, with a median age of 82.0 years (IQR 70.5–86.5), ASA grade III and median follow-up of 20 months (range 8.5–45.5 months). Half of the cohort was over 80 years old. Significant symptomatic relief was achieved, predominantly the resolution of rectal mass (8.9% vs. 60.0% preoperatively), fecal incontinence (15.6% vs. 46.7%) and constipation (4.4% vs. 26.7%). The median length of stay was 6 days, while morbidity occurred in 14 patients (31.1%) and recurrence occurred in 6 patients (13%). There were no deaths within 30 days of the procedure and outcomes were comparable in the Conclusions Perineal rectosigmoidectomy is safe for older patients with greater comorbidities resulting in good functional results and is associated with low morbidity and mortality.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF