Search

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a chronic multisystem disease of aberrant constitutive and reactive mast cell mediator release causing generally inflammatory, allergic, and dystrophic issues. The pathobiology of MCAS drives extraordinary clinical complexity and heterogeneity, which led to only recent recognition despite increasingly apparent substantial prevalence, perhaps as high as 17%. It also has a strong female predilection. Thus, MCAS inescapably impacts pregnancy and the post-partum period in many women. No specific research in the pregnant or post-partum MCAS population has been performed yet. However, its prevalence and potential for driving substantial morbidity merit obstetric providers' acquaintance with this illness and its potential impacts on their patients during pregnancy, delivery, the post-partum period, and lactation. Extensive literature review across all medical specialities, plus direct experience in the authors' practices, provides guidance in recognising MCAS in pregnancy and diagnosing and effectively managing it. Described herein are manners in which MCAS, a protean multisystem disease, adversely affects all stages of pregnancy and post-partum. In order to reduce risks of MCAS causing complications before, during and after pregnancy, identifying and controlling the syndrome prior to pregnancy is best, but, even if the disease is not recognised until late, there may still be opportunities to mitigate its effects. There is precedent for improved outcomes if comorbid MCAS is recognised and controlled. This review provides the first comprehensive guide for obstetric providers regarding this emerging major comorbidity.

The concept that disease rooted principally in chronic aberrant constitutive and reactive activation of mast cells (MCs), without the gross MC neoplasia in mastocytosis, first emerged in the 1980s, but only in the last decade has recognition of "mast cell activation syndrome" (MCAS) grown significantly. Two principal proposals for diagnostic criteria have emerged. One, originally published in 2012, is labeled by its authors as a "consensus" (re-termed here as "consensus-1"). Another sizable contingent of investigators and practitioners favor a different approach (originally published in 2011, newly termed here as "consensus-2"), resembling "consensus-1" in some respects but differing in others, leading to substantial differences between these proposals in the numbers of patients qualifying for diagnosis (and thus treatment). Overdiagnosis by "consensus-2" criteria has potential to be problematic, but underdiagnosis by "consensus-1" criteria seems the far larger problem given (1) increasing appreciation that MCAS is prevalent (up to 17% of the general population), and (2) most MCAS patients, regardless of illness duration prior to diagnosis, can eventually identify treatment yielding sustained improvement. We analyze these proposals (and others) and suggest that, until careful research provides more definitive answers, diagnosis by either proposal is valid, reasonable, and helpful., (©2020 Lawrence B. Afrin et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.)

Dyspareunia, vaginitis and dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) are common problems which, despite their polygenicity, commonly appear idiopathic and treatment-refractory. Mast cell (MC) activation syndrome (MCAS) is a newly-recognised, prevalent, chronic multisystem polymorbidity of general themes of inflammation ± allergic-type phenomena ± aberrant growth/development in assorted tissues. MCs produce significant quantities of heparin, too. As such, MCAS may underlie some cases of chronic dyspareunia, vaginitis or DUB. We report five such patients; all who responded well to MC-targeted treatment. We review aspects of MC biology and pathobiology of potential relevance to otherwise idiopathic persistent inflammatory or coagulopathic genital tract problems. Diagnostic testing for MCAS may be warranted in some patients with chronic dyspareunia, vaginitis or DUB (especially patients whose histories well fit the general profile of MCAS), and prospective therapeutic trials of MC-directed topical and/or systemic therapies may be warranted in such populations. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Chronic, idiopathic, treatment-refractory female genital tract inflammation or bleeding are common problems for which mast cell (MC) disease, previously generally thought to consist of just rare cases of mastocytosis, and is seldom considered in the differential diagnosis. What do the results of this study add? The substantial prevalence of the newly recognised 'mast cell activation syndrome' (MCAS), featuring chronic inappropriate MC activation with little-to-no MC neoplasia, and its clinical presentation with chronic multisystem inflammation ± allergic-type phenomena ± aberrant growth/development in assorted tissues, raises the possibility that MCAS might underlie the aforementioned genital tract problems, especially in patients whose larger clinical presentations fit the MCAS profile. We report five example patients (among many more we have similarly treated) who enjoyed excellent responses to safe, inexpensive MC-targeted treatments, often given just intravaginally. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our report identifies a potentially significant new MC-focused direction, of relevance to millions of affected women worldwide, for clinical treatment as well as for basic and clinical research, which historically has yielded major advancements disappointingly disproportionate to the scope of the affected population.