Search

Background: While research has demonstrated associations between Parkinson's disease (PD) severity and caregiver burden and emotional functioning, less is known about the associations between specific PD symptom patterns and caregiver functioning. Objective: The purpose of the current study was to explore symptomatology subtypes in PD from the caregiver perspective in the U.S. and Mexico and to determine whether caregiver burden, depression, or anxiety differed by PD symptomatology subtype. Methods: Two hundred fifty-three caregivers (M age = 59.9) completed Parts I and II of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), the Zarit Burden Interview, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scales. Results: Cluster analysis using domains from the MDS-UPDRS revealed 5 symptomatology subtypes: pain/motor predominant, low symptoms, severe diffuse symptoms, moderate restricted symptoms with speech/oral predominant, and mood predominant. Caregiver burden was greatest for caregivers of individuals in the severe diffuse symptom and moderate restricted symptoms with speech/oral predominant clusters. High caregiver depression and caregiver anxiety were observed in all clusters other than the low symptoms cluster. There were no site by cluster interactions, suggesting that symptom patterns contribute to caregiver functioning in similar ways in the U.S. and Mexico. Conclusions: This data-driven analysis revealed 5 symptomatology subtypes of PD from caregivers' perspectives and highlighted the need for treatments and interventions based on predominant PD symptom expression. Importance of caregiver support across various symptomatology expressions, and particularly on specialist treatment for predominant speech/oral difficulties was recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Older adults experience age‐related cognitive declines and often feel as if the severity of these declines is out of their control. Recent research suggests, though, that control beliefs may be related to less age‐related declines. The aim of the current study was to investigate cognitive domain‐specific control beliefs and the link between those cognitive control beliefs and cognitive functioning among a nationwide sample of adults (N = 3,670), as well as to explore whether cognitive control beliefs moderated the relationship between age and cognitive functioning. Method: The aims were addressed using data from the national Midlife in the United States study (MIDUS II). Cognitive functioning was assessed using the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT), and cognitive control beliefs were assessed with the Personality in Intellectual Aging Contexts (PIC) Inventory Control Scales. Results: Regression analyses revealed that adults with higher control beliefs demonstrated better cognitive functioning. Moderation analyses indicated cognitive control beliefs moderated the relationship between age and executive functioning, but not the association between age and episodic memory. Conclusion: Results suggested that the relationship between age and executive functioning was weaker at high levels of cognitive control beliefs. Future research should establish the directionality of the effect between cognitive control beliefs and cognition and investigate the association between control beliefs and cognition in samples at higher risk for substantial cognitive decline, including the oldest‐old. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective/Background: Sleep health is a multidimensional construct of sleep and wakefulness that operationalizes optimal sleep as more than the absence disease. Despite its importance to public health promotion efforts, empirical research examining sleep health is currently limited, possibly due to the lack of empirically validated measures. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a previously proposed six-item sleep health scale (RU- SATED). Participants: A sample of 3,401 adults (Mean Age = 42.77, 47.8% female) completed an online survey of sleep and health. Methods: Participants completed the RU-SATED scale, as well as other sleep-related measures including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and the Sleep Self-Efficacy Scale (SSE). Results: An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a two-factor structure. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using this two-factor structure demonstrated adequate to good model fit indices (X2 = 45.96, df = 8, p <.01; RMSEA =.04; CFI =.98; NFI =.98; TLI =.97). Cronbach's α was.64 and the average interitem correlation was.22. RU-SATED was negatively associated with insomnia severity and positively associated with both self-reported sleep and sleep self-efficacy. Conclusions: RU-SATED appears to be a valid instrument for the assessment of sleep health among adults that is related to, but distinct from, other established sleep constructs. Future research may benefit from examining the test–retest reliability of the measure and assessing the predictive validity of sleep health as it relates to health-related outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]