Search

PM concentration in tissues after a single intravenous administration to BL-2 bearing mice (Mean {plus minus} SD; n = 4).

Toxicity studies of PM.

Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Figure Legends

Purpose:This study was to perform preclinical evaluation of a novel class I and IIb HDAC-selective inhibitor, purinostat mesylate, for the treatment of Ph+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).Experimental Design:Biochemical assays were used to test enzymatic activity inhibition of purinostat mesylate. Ph+ leukemic cell lines and patient cells were used to evaluate purinostat mesylate activity in vitro. BL-2 secondary transplantation Ph+ B-ALL mouse model was used to validate its efficacy, mechanism, and pharmacokinetics properties in vivo. BCR-ABL(T315I)–induced primary B-ALL mouse model and PDX mouse model derived from relapsed Ph+ B-ALL patient post TKI treatment were used to determine the antitumor effect of purinostat mesylate for refractory or relapsed Ph+ B-ALL. Long-term toxicity and hERG blockade assays were used to safety evaluation of purinostat mesylate.Results:Purinostat mesylate, a class I and IIb HDAC highly selective inhibitor, exhibited robust antitumor activity in hematologic cancers. Purinostat mesylate at low nanomolar concentration induced apoptosis, and downregulated BCR-ABL and c-MYC expression in Ph+ leukemia cell lines and primary Ph+ B-ALL cells from relapsed patients. Purinostat mesylate efficiently attenuated Ph+ B-ALL progression and significantly prolonged the survival both in BL-2 secondary transplantation model with clinical patient symptoms of Ph+ B-ALL, BCR-ABL(T315I)–induced primary B-ALL mouse model, and PDX model derived from patients with relapsed Ph+ B-ALL post TKI treatment. In addition, purinostat mesylate possesses favorable pharmacokinetics and low toxicity properties.Conclusions:Purinostat mesylate provides a new therapeutic strategy for patients with Ph+ B-ALL, including those who relapse after TKI treatment.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells targeting CD19 have drastically improved the outcomes of B-cell malignancies; however, the success has not yet extended to myeloid malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Main impediments in the development of CAR T therapy in AML include difficulty in identifying appropriate target antigens that are specific to myeloid leukemia stem cells while sparing the healthy hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs). Herein, we discuss the current state of CAR T-cell therapy in AML, highlighting recent progress and limitations in clinical translation. We also discuss novel approaches in CAR T therapy development and potential strategies to enhance anti-leukemic activity while minimizing toxicity to heathy cells to make CAR T-cell therapy a viable option for patients with AML.

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy has revolutionized the management of lymphoid malignancies. However, it is still in its early phase and is facing many obstacles in solid tumors. Therapeutic challenges in solid tumor lead to tumor target diversification and drive new innovations for the improvement of clinical efficacy. This review showcases early clinical works and sheds light on the most notable successes, drawbacks, and strategies employed to allow CAR T therapy to go full speed ahead.

Autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been extensively studied over the past decades. Currently, autologous CAR T products are FDA-approved to treat B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), large B cell, mantle cell, and follicular lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. However, this therapy has drawbacks including higher cost, production lead time, logistical complexity, and higher risk of manufacturing failure. Alternatively, allogeneic CAR T cell therapy, currently under clinical trial, has inherent disadvantages, including cell rejection, graft versus host disease, and undetermined safety and efficacy profiles. Different strategies, including modifying HLA and T cell receptor expression using different effector cells, are under investigation to circumvent these issues. Early allogeneic CAR T therapy results for B-ALL and B-NHL have been promising. Large sample clinical trials are ongoing. Here, we discuss the pros and cons of allo-CAR T for hematologic malignancies and review the latest data on this scalable approach.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 6 CAR T cell (CAR-T) products, including tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in the last 5 years. CAR T-cell therapy significantly improved outcomes for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). However, recurrence and progression may occur after the initial response due to multiple mechanisms (Zeng and Zhang, 2022) [1]. Furthermore, CAR T-cell therapy is not broadly utilized in solid tumors due to various barriers. This review discusses the evolution of CAR T-cell therapies and how the "younger-generation" CAR T cells counteract these challenges to potentially broaden their applications in the future.

CAR T-cell therapy has significantly improved the outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). However, most clinical trials excluded patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement due to uncertain efficacy and safety.On January 1, 2022, we searched PubMed to identify all published literature associated with current commercial CAR T-cell therapies for B-NHL, including tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel). Studies that involved patients with either primary or secondary CNS lymphoma, and evaluated response rate, adverse events (AEs), or survival were included and summarized.Herein, we summarize the results of 11 studies qualified for our inclusion criteria, reporting 58 lymphoma patients with CNS Involvement with 44 evaluable for clinical response, 25 for immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and 48 for Cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Objective response was achieved in 62% (16/26) of patients, and CR was achieved in 52% (23/44) of patients. Forty-four percent (11/25) developed ICANS, and 35% (17/48) developed severe ICANS (grade≥3). CRS was reported in 63% (15/24) of patients, while severe CRS (grade≥3) was reported in 7% (3/42) of patients.Based on our PubMed literature review, we conclude that CAR T-cell therapy may benefit patients with CNS lymphoma with promising response rates and acceptable AE. However, definite conclusions cannot be drawn until data with a larger sample size is available.

Purpose: This study was to perform preclinical evaluation of a novel class I and IIb HDAC-selective inhibitor, purinostat mesylate, for the treatment of Ph+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Experimental Design: Biochemical assays were used to test enzymatic activity inhibition of purinostat mesylate. Ph+ leukemic cell lines and patient cells were used to evaluate purinostat mesylate activity in vitro. BL-2 secondary transplantation Ph+ B-ALL mouse model was used to validate its efficacy, mechanism, and pharmacokinetics properties in vivo. BCR-ABL(T315I)–induced primary B-ALL mouse model and PDX mouse model derived from relapsed Ph+ B-ALL patient post TKI treatment were used to determine the antitumor effect of purinostat mesylate for refractory or relapsed Ph+ B-ALL. Long-term toxicity and hERG blockade assays were used to safety evaluation of purinostat mesylate. Results: Purinostat mesylate, a class I and IIb HDAC highly selective inhibitor, exhibited robust antitumor activity in hematologic cancers. Purinostat mesylate at low nanomolar concentration induced apoptosis, and downregulated BCR-ABL and c-MYC expression in Ph+ leukemia cell lines and primary Ph+ B-ALL cells from relapsed patients. Purinostat mesylate efficiently attenuated Ph+ B-ALL progression and significantly prolonged the survival both in BL-2 secondary transplantation model with clinical patient symptoms of Ph+ B-ALL, BCR-ABL(T315I)–induced primary B-ALL mouse model, and PDX model derived from patients with relapsed Ph+ B-ALL post TKI treatment. In addition, purinostat mesylate possesses favorable pharmacokinetics and low toxicity properties. Conclusions: Purinostat mesylate provides a new therapeutic strategy for patients with Ph+ B-ALL, including those who relapse after TKI treatment.

Multiple myeloma (MM) pathogenesis remains incompletely understood and biomarkers predicting treatment response still remain lacking. Here we describe the rational mechanisms of combining targeting glautaminase1 (GLS1) with other chemo-reagents for MM treatment. Gls1 is highly expressed cMYC/KRAS12V-drived plasmacytoma (PCT) cells. Down-regulation of Gls1 with miRNAi in cMYC/KRAS12V-expressing BaF3 cells prevented them from growing independence of interleukin 3 (IL3). By using our cMYC/KRAS12V-transduced adoptive plasmacytoma mouse model, we found that Gls1 is involved in PCT pathogenesis. Down-regulation of Gls1 significantly prolonged the survival of PCT recipients. Knockdown of Gls1 increased the expression of Cdkn1a and Cdkn1b and decreased the expression of some critical oncogenes for cancer cell survival, such as c-Myc, Cdk4, and NfκB, as well as some genes which are essential for MM cell survival, such as Irf4, Prdm1, Csnk1α1, and Rassf5. Combination of Gls1 inhibition with LBH589, Bortezomib, or Lenalidomide significantly impaired tumor growth in a MM xenograft mouse model. Our data strongly suggest that Gls1 plays an important role for MM pathogenesis and that combination of GLS1 inhibitor with other MM therapy agents could benefit to MM patients.

This study was to perform preclinical evaluation of a novel class I and IIb HDAC-selective inhibitor, purinostat mesylate, for the treatment of PhBiochemical assays were used to test enzymatic activity inhibition of purinostat mesylate. PhPurinostat mesylate, a class I and IIb HDAC highly selective inhibitor, exhibited robust antitumor activity in hematologic cancers. Purinostat mesylate at low nanomolar concentration induced apoptosis, and downregulated BCR-ABL and c-MYC expression in PhPurinostat mesylate provides a new therapeutic strategy for patients with Ph

Summary The regulation of mRNA translation is of fundamental importance in biological mechanisms ranging from embryonic axis specification to the formation of long-term memory. POS-1 is one of several CCCH zinc-finger RNA-binding proteins that regulate cell fate specification during C. elegans embryogenesis. Paradoxically, pos-1 mutants exhibit striking defects in endo-mesoderm development but have wild-type distributions of SKN-1, a key determinant of endo-mesoderm fates. RNAi screens for pos-1 suppressors identified genes encoding the cytoplasmic poly(A)-polymerase homolog GLD-2, the Bicaudal-C homolog GLD-3, and the protein NEG-1. We show that NEG-1 localizes in anterior nuclei, where it negatively regulates endo-mesoderm fates. In posterior cells, POS-1 binds the neg-1 3′ UTR to oppose GLD-2 and GLD-3 activities that promote NEG-1 expression and cytoplasmic lengthening of the neg-1 mRNA poly(A) tail. Our findings uncover an intricate series of post-transcriptional regulatory interactions that, together, achieve precise spatial expression of endo-mesoderm fates in C. elegans embryos.