Search

A spectacular diversity of forms and features allow species to thrive in different environments, yet some structures remain relatively unchanged. Insect compound eyes are easily recognizable despite dramatic differences in visual abilities across species. It is unknown whether distant insect species use similar or different mechanisms to pattern their eyes or what types of genetic changes produce diversity of form and function. We find that flies, mosquitos, butterflies, moths, beetles, wasps, honeybees, and crickets use homologous developmental programs to pattern their retinas. Transcription factor expression can be used to establish homology of different photoreceptor (PR) types across the insects: Prospero (Pros) for R7, Spalt (Sal) for R7+R8, and Defective proventriculus (Dve) for R1-6. Using gene knockout (CRISPR/Cas9) in houseflies, butterflies, and crickets and gene knockdown (RNAi) in beetles, we found that like Drosophila, EGFR and Sevenless (Sev) signaling pathways are required to recruit motion and color vision PRs, though Drosophila have a decreased reliance on Sev signaling relative to other insects. Despite morphological and physiological variation across species, retina development passes through a highly conserved phylotypic stage when the unit eyes (ommatidia) are first patterned. This patterning process likely represents an insect eye ground plan that is established by an ancient developmental program. We identify three types of developmental patterning modifications (ground plan modification, nonstochastic patterns, and specialized regions) that allow for the diversification of insect eyes. We suggest that developmental divergence after the ground plan is established is responsible for the exceptional diversity observed across insect visual systems.

A spectacular diversity of forms and features allow species to thrive in different environments, yet some structures remain relatively unchanged. Insect compound eyes are easily recognizable despite dramatic differences in visual abilities across species. It is unknown whether distant insect species use similar or different mechanisms to pattern their eyes or what types of genetic changes produce diversity of form and function. We find that flies, mosquitos, butterflies, moths, beetles, wasps, honeybees, and crickets use homologous developmental programs to pattern their retinas. Transcription factor expression can be used to establish homology of different photoreceptor (PR) types across the insects: Prospero (Pros) for R7, Spalt (Sal) for R7+R8, and Defective proventriculus (Dve) for R1-6. Using gene knockout (CRISPR/Cas9) in houseflies, butterflies, and crickets and gene knockdown (RNAi) in beetles, we found that like Drosophila, EGFR and Sevenless (Sev) signaling pathways are required to recruit motion and color vision PRs, though Drosophila have a decreased reliance on Sev signaling relative to other insects. Despite morphological and physiological variation across species, retina development passes through a highly conserved phylotypic stage when the unit eyes (ommatidia) are first patterned. This patterning process likely represents an "insect eye ground plan" that is established by an ancient developmental program. We identify three types of developmental patterning modifications (ground plan modification, nonstochastic patterns, and specialized regions) that allow for the diversification of insect eyes. We suggest that developmental divergence after the ground plan is established is responsible for the exceptional diversity observed across insect visual systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ciliated epithelia are widespread in animals and play crucial roles in many developmental and physiological processes. Epithelia composed of multi-ciliated cells allow for directional fluid flow in the trachea, oviduct and brain cavities. Monociliated epithelia play crucial roles in vertebrate embryos, from the establishment of left–right asymmetry to the control of axis curvature via cerebrospinal flow motility in zebrafish. Cilia also have a central role in the motility and feeding of free-swimming larvae in a variety of marine organisms. These diverse functions rely on the coordinated orientation (rotational polarity) and asymmetric localization (translational polarity) of cilia and of their centriole-derived basal bodies across the epithelium, both being forms of planar cell polarity (PCP). Here, we review our current knowledge on the mechanisms of the translational polarity of basal bodies in vertebrate monociliated epithelia from the molecule to the whole organism. We highlight the importance of live imaging for understanding the dynamics of centriole polarization. We review the roles of core PCP pathways and of apicobasal polarity proteins, such as Par3, whose central function in this process has been recently uncovered. Finally, we emphasize the importance of the coordination between polarity proteins, the cytoskeleton and the basal body itself in this highly dynamic process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]