Search

Background and Purpose: We know that treatment algorithms have changed in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) practice during the pandemic. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether there was a change in the patient population for ocrelizumab (OCR) treatment during the pandemic period, the treatment compliance of the patients, and the course of the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) disease in the patients who received OCR., Methods: Our study was designed as a survey study. A questionnaire was sent to the patients assessing whether they had COVID-19 infection, whether they received treatments regularly before and after the pandemic, vaccination status and duration of OCR treatment. Demographic characteristics of the patients, treatments they used before, MS type, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were determined from the database. Each group of OCR started before pandemic and OCR started after pandemic were compared., Results: We included into the study 86 patients who started OCR before pandemic period and 75 patients who started OCR after the pandemic. Demographic features were similar. EDSS scores were higher in the group that started OCR treatment before the pandemic (p<0.0001). The patients who started OCR treatment before the pandemic had more disruptions than which started during the pandemic (p<0.0001). No correlation was found between the duration of OCR treatment and COVID-19 infection (p=0.940). We observed that the patients who had severe COVID-19 infection had received OCR therapy for a longer period., Conclusion: This retrospective study concluded that the OCR treatment approach in our center had changed during the pandemic period. OCR therapy was started in patients with less disability. The possible reasons for this situation include the proven relationship between high EDSS and serious COVID-19 infection, and that the patients who have higher EDSS score had troubles in reaching health institutions during the pandemic. The result that patients with severe COVID-19 infection received OCR treatment for a longer period necessitates more evidence-based research to investigate the relationship between treatment duration and disease severity.

Background: COVID-19 is a multisystemic infection with variables consequences depending on individual and comorbid conditions. The course and outcomes of COVID-19 during neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD) are not clearly known., Objective/methods: The aim of this study was to examine the features and outcomes of COVID-19 infection in NMOSD and MOGAD patients. The patients' demographic and clinical factors, disease modifying treatment (DMT) used and disease information of COVID-19 infection were recorded. Conditions leading to hospitalization and severe exposure to COVID-19 infection were also analyzed., Results: The study included 63 patients from 25 centers. Thirty-two patients (50.8%) belong to AQP-4 seropositive group, 13 (20.6%) and 18 (28.6%) were in MOG-positive and double-seronegative groups, respectively. Risk factors for severe COVID-19 infection and hospitalization were advanced age, high disability level and the presence of comorbid disease. Disease severity was found to be high in double-seronegative NMOSD and low in MOGAD patients. No statistically significant effect of DMTs on disease severity and hospitalization was found., Conclusion: In NMOSD and MOGAD patients, advanced age, high disability and presence of comorbid disease pose risks for severe COVID-19 infection. There was no direct significant effect of DMTs for COVID-19 infection., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Comprehensive assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in terms of patient profile, clinical and disease-related factors has great epidemiological value. This study aimed to evaluate patient experience and disease-related awareness in MS patients through a nation-wide survey in Turkey Methods: A total of 1379 MS patients participated in this cross-sectional questionnaire survey conducted between November 2018 and December 2018. The online questionnaire form included items on sociodemographic, disease-related, first-admission, treatment and follow up characteristics as well as the disability status., Results: Patients were diagnosed at median 28.0 years of age, while the average time from admission to diagnosis and time from diagnosis to treatment were 1.2 years and 2.5 months, respectively. Neurology (45.4%) and ophthalmology (23.3%) were the most common clinics for the first admission, while numbness-weakness in lower and upper extremities (37.6%) and double vision-visual problems (30.6%) were the most common symptoms on initial admission. Treatment was initiated after the diagnosis in 1213(88.0%) patients, while 166 (12.0%) patients were treatment-naïve. Treatment discontinuation, treatment switch and use of alternative treatment methods were reported by 31.3%, 49.3% and 22.8% of patients, respectively. The ophthalmology admissions (with double vision or visual problems) were associated with the shortest time from presentation to diagnosis as compared with neurosurgery and internal medicine admissions (median 1.0 vs. 3.0 and 4.0 months, p<0.001). The neurology admissions (with numbness-weakness in extremities) were associated with more prompt (median 0.3 vs. 0.5 months, p=0.032) and more frequent onset of treatment after diagnosis (64.5% vs. 2.2% to 15.2%, p<0.001). Time from presentation to diagnosis was longer in patients aged >50 years (median 6.0 months vs. 2.0 months, p<0.001), in patients using alternative medicine (median 3.0 months vs. 1 month, p=0.001) and in patients admitted to a non-MS-center (median 3.0 months vs. 2.0 months, p=0.002). Median (min-max) age at diagnosis was significantly lower in patients with vs. without treatment discontinuation for any reason (26.0(10-56) vs. 29.0(3-60) years, p<0.001) and treatment switching (27.0(5-93) vs. 30.0(3-60) years, p<0.001)., Conclusions: In conclusion, our findings revealed higher likelihood of earlier diagnosis and earlier treatment in patients admitted to an MS-center and in those presenting with ocular problems and sensory-motor deficits, respectively. Our findings also emphasize the association of older patient age with higher likelihood of diagnostic delay, and increased likelihood of treatment discontinuation for any reason and/or treatment switching in case of older patient age, younger age at diagnosis and diagnostic delay. In this regard, our findings highlight the need for improved awareness among patients as well as clinicians on initial manifestations of MS to enable admission or referral to an MS-center and to prevent delay in diagnosis, particularly for onset symptoms other than ocular or sensory-motor characteristics., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Aim: To investigate the genetic etiology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease or hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN)., Material and Methods: We herein examined 55 non-related patients with a suspicion of CMT phenotype or HMSN using a customized multigene panel based on the next-generation sequencing technique. All cases were previously analyzed for PMP22 duplication with the Multiplex Ligand Probe Amplification (MLPA) method., Results: In 13 cases (7.15%), we identified a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant. The affected genes were MARS1, NDRG1, GJB1, GDAP1, MFN2, PRX, SH3TC2, and FGD4. In six cases (10.9%), novel variants were identified: pathogenic variants in GJB1 and FGD4 genes, variants of unknown significance (VUS) in HSPB3, CHRNA1, ARHGEF10, and KIF5A genes. In 21 cases (11.55%), VUS with the genes HSPB3, KIF1B, SCN11A, CHRNA1, HSPB1, FIG4, ARHGEF10, DHTKD1, SBF1, EGR2, SBF2, IGHMBP2, KIF5A, and DNAJB2 were identified., Conclusion: In this study, we had a 7.15% diagnosis rate with the NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) method in the CMT disease. Targeted next-generation sequencing panels are beneficial, time-saving, and cost-effective in the diagnosis of CMT.