Search

Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a major global health challenge, with high incidence rates and ongoing treatment debates. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefits for high-risk subgroups, particularly stage II disease, remain controversial. This study seeks to clarify this issue by specifically examining the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with T4 colon cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing radical surgery for T4 colon cancer between 2002 and 2023. Results: Our study of 184 pT4 pN0 colon cancer patients revealed that 79.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant DFS improvement: a 60% reduction in risk for those who received adjuvant therapy (0.40 95% CI: 0.25–0.62, p < 0.001). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and adjuvant treatment were also significantly associated with OS. Adjuvant treatment reduced mortality by 60% (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23–0.68, p = 0.001). Patients with LVI had a 1.9-fold increase in mortality (HR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.17–3.20, p = 0.011). These findings underscore the potential value of adjuvant chemotherapy and highlight the importance of treatment completion in managing T4 colon cancer. Conclusions: Our study identifies LVI and adjuvant chemotherapy as key prognostic factors in T4 colon cancer patients. These results support the consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Based on this study, we define a new biomarker termed lymphocyte-to-albumin ratio (LAR) that may predict the prognosis for patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with immunotherapy. This study aims to determine the relationship of the LA index with patients' survival rate through studying the records of 227 patients who were treated with nivolumab after one or multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Therefore, the results showed that a higher LA index is significantly related to better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall, the LA index deserves its merit of being a simple, cost-effective, noninvasive method applicable in NSCLC immunotherapy as a clinically practical tool for predicting treatment outcomes. Objective: Immunotherapies are commonly employed for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, predictive biomarkers still need to be improved to predict responses to these agents. The lymphocyte–albumin (LA) laboratory index has not been evaluated before in this patient group. The aim of this study was to analyze the relation between the LA index and the survival rate of metastatic NSCLC patients who had immunotherapy after at least one round of chemotherapy. Methods: The research included 227 patients diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC, who were administered nivolumab after at least one round of chemotherapy. The LA index was calculated by multiplying lymphocyte count and albumin concentration. The optimal threshold values for the index were established by the examination of the ROC curve for both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Oncological data were obtained retrospectively from patient files, and survival analyses were performed. Results: The median follow-up was 7.9 months. Progression was observed in 129 (56.9%) patients. A total of 97 (42.7%) patients died during the follow-up. The cutoff values of the LA index to predict OS and PFS were determined as 52.87 and 57.67, respectively. The low-LA group had significantly lowered OS and PFS compared to the high-LA group. LA was found to be an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio 4.47; 95% confidence interval, 2.73–7.34; p < 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio 6.24; 95% confidence interval, 3.46–11.25; p < 0.001) in the multivariate regression analysis. Conclusions: In this study, we observed that the LA index independently predicts OS and PFS in immunotherapy-treated metastatic NSCLC patients. Its ease of application, low cost, and noninvasive nature make it a potential guide for clinicians in predicting treatment responses and survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) accounts for 0.01% of all carcinomas, and 70% of patients have locally advanced disease with a poor prognosis. The mainstay therapy is chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and concurrent administration of platinum-based agents and irradiation provides high local control rates. However, induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (ICT) prior to CRT is recommended for large tumors with a high tumor burden at the category 1 level. For ICT, platinum-based doublet or triplet combination regimens are recommended. Selected patients with a high tumor burden at the time of diagnosis who did not receive ICT before CRT were given adjuvant (consolidation) therapy after CRT. This multicenter study aimed to share our experience in treatment of NPC and evaluate the factors associated with survival. Methods: The study included patients diagnosed with NPC who were followed and treated between 2008 and 2022. Hundred and forty-two patients from 6 centers were evaluated. The factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: The median age of our patients was 51 years (IQR: 16–81 years), and the male:female ratio was 2.5:1. A majority of patients (71%) had stage 3–4 disease. They had locally advanced disease, and 48 patients (34%) received ICT. Twenty patients (14%) received adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 2.7–175.1 months). The median DFS in NPC was 92.6 months (range, 71.9–113.3 months), with a 40th month DFS of 70.9%. The median OS was 113 months (range, 91–135 months), with a 40th month OS of 84.7%. Median DFS was 95.3 months (range, 64.2–126.4 months) in patients who received ICT before CRT, which was longer than in the CRT-only group (p = 0.6). DFS at the 40th month was 75.1% in patients treated with ICT compared to 65.1% in the CRT-only group. Median OS was 117 months (range, 92–142 months) in patients receiving ICT, which was longer than in the CRT-only group (p = 0.4). OS at the 40th month was 86.7% in patients receiving ICT but 83.6% in the CRT-only group. Conclusions: Both the objective response rate and survival were longer in patients who radiologically responded to CRT following ICT. Nonresponse to ICT is a negative predictive indicator. The role of ICT in locally advanced NPC is increasing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is extensively employed in breast cancer (BC), primarily for aggressive subtypes like triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive BC and in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2− BC with high-risk features. In ER+/HER2− BC, pathological complete rates are much lower (<10%), while axillary dissection rates are higher. This study focuses on hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2− BC patients undergoing NAC, examining its impact on pathological complete response (pCR) rates, with specific attention to tumor Ki67 and ER status. Methods: Retrospective data analysis from Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital included HR+/HER2− BC patients who received NAC. Clinicopathological factors, NAC response, and surgical outcomes were assessed. Statistical analyses evaluated the association between Ki67, ER status, and pCR. Results: Of 203 patients, 11.8% achieved pCR. Ki67 (p < 0.001) and ER percentage (p < 0.001) significantly correlated with pCR. Higher Ki67 was associated with increased pCR likelihood (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01–1.05). A Ki67-pCR probability curve revealed a cutoff of 23.5%. ER%-pCR analysis showed decreasing pCR rates with higher ER percentages. Multivariate analysis confirmed Ki67 (p = 0.003, HR: 1.02) and ER percentage (p = 0.019, HR: 0.97) as independent predictors of pCR probability. Conclusion: Consideration of Ki67 and ER percentage aids in NAC decisions for HR+/HER2− BC, identifying patients with high NAC response rates, facilitating axillary preservation, and potentially avoiding axillary dissection. The pCR rates in patients with Ki67 ≤24 are particularly low, especially in patients with a high ER percentage. In these cases, upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment should be considered instead of NAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary testicular lymphoma, is a rare testis tumor that accounts for only less than 9% of all testis tumors. In the preoperative period, it is extremely difficult to distinguish this tumor from other testis tumors. Its diagnosis is done by histological analysis. Most commonly encountered histological type is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Adjuvant radiotheraphy and/or chemotheraphy is given after orchiectomy. Prognosis is worse than other testis tumors. Non-metastatic tumors indicates good prognosis within one year. Ongoing research in patients with primary testicular lymphoma, are on efficacy of adjuvant theraphies and preventive and cure effect on extranodal extension to central nervous system which is the most common site for recurrency. There are conflicting results because of the small number of patient size. Here we present two cases with primary testicular lymphoma at the ages 71 and 82. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Breast cancer (BC) remains a significant health concern, particularly in advanced stages where the prognosis is poor. The combination of endocrine therapy (ET) with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has improved outcomes for advanced BC (aBC) patients. However, resistance to CDK4/6i remains a challenge, with no validated biomarkers to predict response. The receptor activator of the nuclear factor-kB (RANK) pathway has emerged as a key player in aBC, particularly in luminal BC. RANK overexpression has been associated with aggressive phenotypes and resistance to therapy. In view of these findings, we proceeded to investigate the potential involvement of the RANK pathway in luminal BC resistance to CDK4/6i. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of denosumab in increasing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)., Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 158 BC patients with bone metastases were included. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative and hormone receptor-positive BC who received palbociclib or ribociclib in addition to antiresorptive medication were included. Patients received either denosumab or zoledronic acid (ZA) therapy. The primary endpoint was OS, with PFS as a secondary endpoint., Results: Although the PFS and OS of denosumab were better than ZA in this study, it did not show a significant difference between the two drugs. Meanwhile, mOS was not achievable in patients in the denosumab group, while it was 34.1 months in patients in the ZA group. The hazard ratio (HR) showed a significant improvement for the denosumab group in patients under 60 of age (HR: 0.33, p<0.01), patients with a score of 1 HER2 overexpression (HR: 0.09, p=0.01), and patients with resistant endocrine (HR: 0.42, p=0.02) compared to ZA., Conclusion: This study highlights the potential clinical relevance of the RANK pathway in BC treatment, and our findings suggest that denosumab may offer significant benefits in terms of PFS and OS for certain subgroups, particularly those with HER2 scores of 1, patients under 60, and those with endocrine-resistant BC. In conclusion, considering that RANK pathway status may be a predictive biomarker for CDK4/6i treatment and may cause treatment resistance, our results demonstrate the clinical relevance of the combination of CDK4/6i + ET with RANKL inhibition., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Review Board of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital issued approval 2023/514/250/2. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Akdag et al.)