1. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 5‐year results of an RCT using 3D digital measurement technology for volumetric comparison of soft tissue changes
- Author
-
Dodji Lukas Akakpo, Peter Eickholz, Markus B. Hürzeler, Hari Petsos, Kirstin Vach, Otto Zuhr, and Research Group for Oral Soft Tissue Biology & Wound Healing
- Subjects
Technology ,Gingiva ,Connective tissue ,Subepithelial connective tissue graft ,Esthetics, Dental ,Matrix (biology) ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Dental Enamel Proteins ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,medicine ,Humans ,Gingival Recession ,ddc:610 ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Tooth Root ,Gingival recession ,Enamel paint ,business.industry ,Soft tissue ,030206 dentistry ,Root coverage ,Treatment Outcome ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Connective Tissue ,visual_art ,visual_art.visual_art_medium ,Periodontics ,medicine.symptom ,Nuclear medicine ,business - Abstract
Aim: Comparison of the clinical efficacy (digitally volumetric, aesthetic, patient-centred outcomes) of tunnel technique (TUN) with subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) versus coronally advanced flap (CAF) with enamel matrix derivate (EMD) 5 years after gingival recession therapy. Materials and methods: In 18 patients contributing 36 RT1 recessions, study models were collected at baseline and follow-ups. Optical scans assessed recessions computer-assisted [recession depth, recession reduction (RECred), complete root coverage (CRC), percentage of root coverage (RC), pointwise (pTHK) and mean areal (aTHK) marginal soft tissue thickness]. Root coverage aesthetic Score (RES) was used for aesthetic evaluation and visual analogue scales for patient-centred data collection applied. Results: Sixty months after surgery, 50.0% (TUN+CTG) and 0.0% (CAF+EMD) of sites showed CRC (p = 0.0118), 82.2% (TUN+CTG) and 32.0% (CAF+EMD) achieved RC, respectively (p = 0.0023). CTG achieved significantly better RECred (TUN+CTG: 1.75±0.74 mm; CAF+EMD: 0.50 ± 0.39 mm; p = 0.0009) and aTHK (TUN+CTG: 0.95 ± 0.41 mm; CAF+EMD: 0.26 ± 0.28 mm; p = 0.0013). RES showed superior outcomes (p = 0.0533) for TUN+CTG (6.86 ± 2.31) compared to CAF+EMD (4.63 ± 1.99). The study failed to find significant differences related to patient-centred outcomes (TUN+CTG: 8.30 ± 2.21; CAF+EMD: 7.50 ± 1.51; p = 0.1136). Conclusions: Five years after treatment, CTG resulted in better clinical and aesthetic outcomes than CAF+EMD. Increased THK was associated with improved outcomes for RECred and RC.
- Published
- 2021