Search

Purpose A consensus has been reached regarding diverting stoma (DS) construction in rectal cancer surgery to avoid reoperation related to anastomotic leakage. However, the incidence of stoma-related complications (SRCs) remains high. In this study, we examined the perioperative outcomes of DS construction in patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Methods We included 400 participants who underwent radical sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer between 2005 and 2017. These participants were divided into the DS (+) and DS (–) groups, and the outcomes, including postoperative complications, were compared. Results The incidence of ileus was higher in the DS (+) group than in the DS (–) group (P

Aim: Although proximal faecal diversion is standard of care to protect patients with high‐risk colorectal anastomoses against septic complications of anastomotic leakage, it is associated with significant morbidity. The Colovac device (CD) is an intraluminal bypass device intended to avoid stoma creation in patients undergoing low anterior resection. A preliminary study (SAFE‐1) completed in three European centres demonstrated 100% protection of colorectal anastomoses in 15 patients, as evidenced by the absence of faeces below the CD. This phase III trial (SAFE‐2) aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the CD in a larger cohort of patients undergoing curative rectal cancer resection. Methods: SAFE‐2 is a pivotal, multicentre, prospective, open‐label, randomized, controlled trial. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the CD arm or the diverting loop ileostomy arm, with a recruitment target of 342 patients. The co‐primary endpoints are the occurrence of major postoperative complications within 12 months of index surgery and the effectiveness of the CD in reducing stoma creation rates. Data regarding quality of life and patient's acceptance and tolerance of the device will be collected. Discussion: SAFE‐2 is a multicentre randomized, control trial assessing the efficacy and the safety of the CD in protecting low colorectal anastomoses created during oncological resection relative to standard diverting loop ileostomy. Trial registration: NCT05010850. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aim Obstructive colon cancer is locally advanced colon cancer with poor prognosis. However, the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on obstructive colon cancer remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of NAC in patients with obstructive colon cancer. Methods From January 2012 to December 2017, we collected patient data for clinical stage II/III obstructive colon cancer at seven Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG) institutions. The long‐term outcomes of the NAC and non‐NAC groups were analyzed retrospectively after adjusting for patients' background characteristics using propensity score matching. Results Among the 202 eligible patients, propensity score matching extracted 51 patients each for the NAC and non‐NAC groups. After matching, the groups showed no marked differences in the background factors. All the patients in the NAC group underwent diverting stoma construction. Nineteen patients (37.3%) experienced grade 3–4 adverse events during NAC. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between groups. The 5‐year progression‐free survival rates were 75.8% in the NAC group and 63.0% in the non‐NAC group (p = 0.22, log‐rank test). The 5‐year overall survival rates were 88.5% in the NAC group and 78.8% in the non‐NAC group (p = 0.09, log‐rank test). Conclusion Although NAC was feasible for obstructive colon cancer after diverting stoma construction, its effects on long‐term outcomes could not be proven.

OBJECTIVE: Anastomosis leakage in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is still a serious problem affecting the patient's treatment outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the role of a transanal drainage tube compared with a diverting stoma in reducing the rate of anastomosis leakage and limiting surgical complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 196 rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection from July 2018 to October 2022 at 108 Central Military Hospital. The transanal drainage tube was placed in 133 patients (group A), and diverting stoma was performed in 63 patients (group B). RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups regarding age, sex, comorbidities, distance from the tumor to the anal verge, and preoperative stage. The amount of blood loss, the method of performing the anastomosis, and the distance from the anastomosis to the anal verge did not differ between the two groups. However, the surgical time was longer in the group with diverting stoma (138.3 ± 25.1 minutes vs. 127.6 ± 31 minutes, p = 0.018). The rate of anastomosis was not significantly different between groups A and B (8.3% in group A and 7.9% in group B, p = 0.936). The proportion of patients with anastomosis requiring reoperation in group A was higher than in group B. However, the difference was not statistically significant (8/11 patients in group A and 2/5 patients in group B, p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Placing a transanal drainage tube in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer to reduce the rate of anastomosis can be considered an alternative method for diverting stoma with complications related to the stoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Stoma site obstruction (SSO) is one of the stoma-related complications. Diverting stoma is often constructed with anus-preserving surgery for the purpose of reducing the risk of anastomotic failure. We examined the risk factors of SSO with anus-preserving surgery. Methods: We studied 99 patients who underwent anus-preserving surgery and elective diverting stoma. We evaluated the incidence of SSO and looked for any relationship between perioperative factors and SSO. Results: SSO was detected 9 cases (9%). SSO occurred 5 days after surgery in most cases. Patients were divided into two cohorts according to the occurrence of SSO. The thickness of rectus muscles of the abdomen was thicker in the SSO group (12.3mm vs. 9.1mm; p=0.001). Conclusion: The thickness of rectus muscles of the abdomen was an independent risk for SSO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Obstructive colon cancer is locally advanced colon cancer with poor prognosis. However, the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on obstructive colon cancer remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of NAC in patients with obstructive colon cancer. Methods: From January 2012 to December 2017, we collected patient data for clinical stage II/III obstructive colon cancer at seven Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG) institutions. The long‐term outcomes of the NAC and non‐NAC groups were analyzed retrospectively after adjusting for patients' background characteristics using propensity score matching. Results: Among the 202 eligible patients, propensity score matching extracted 51 patients each for the NAC and non‐NAC groups. After matching, the groups showed no marked differences in the background factors. All the patients in the NAC group underwent diverting stoma construction. Nineteen patients (37.3%) experienced grade 3–4 adverse events during NAC. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between groups. The 5‐year progression‐free survival rates were 75.8% in the NAC group and 63.0% in the non‐NAC group (p = 0.22, log‐rank test). The 5‐year overall survival rates were 88.5% in the NAC group and 78.8% in the non‐NAC group (p = 0.09, log‐rank test). Conclusion: Although NAC was feasible for obstructive colon cancer after diverting stoma construction, its effects on long‐term outcomes could not be proven. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction In current clinical practice, immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICA) remains the standard technique for restoring the gastrointestinal tract following coloproctectomy for low rectal cancer. This anastomosis still requires a temporary diverting stoma to decrease the postoperative morbidity, which remains significantly high. As an alternative, some authors have proposed a two-stage delayed coloanal anastomosis (TS-DCA). This article reports on the surgical technique of TS-DCA. Methods The case described is of a 53-year-old woman, without any particular history, in whom colonoscopy motivated by rectal bleeding revealed an adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a tumor ∼ 1 cm above the puborectalis muscle, graded cT3N + . The extension workup was negative. Seven weeks after chemoradiotherapy, a coloproctectomy with total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed. A TS-DCA was chosen to restore the digestive tract. Conclusion Two-stage delayed coloanal anastomosis is a safe and effective alternative for restoring the digestive tract after proctectomy for low rectal cancer. Recent data seem to show a clear advantage of this technique in terms of morbidity.

Aim: Creation of a diverting stoma in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) can counteract luminal inflammation. The clinical utility of a diverting stoma with the prospect of restoration of gastrointestinal continuity warrants further investigation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the long‐term effects of creation of a diverting stoma on the disease course in patients with luminal colonic CD. Method: In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study we investigated the disease course of patients who received a diverting stoma in the biological era. Clinical characteristics, medication use and surgical course were assessed at the time of creation of the diverting stoma and during follow‐up. The primary outcome was the rate of successful and lasting reestablishment of gastrointestinal continuity. Results: Thirty six patients with refractory luminal CD from four institutions underwent creation of a diverting stoma. Of the overall cohort, 20 (56%) patients had their gastrointestinal continuity reestablished after initial stoma creation and 14 (39%) who had their stoma reversed remained stoma‐free during a median of 3.3 years follow‐up (interquartile range 2.1–6.1 years). Absence of stoma reversal was associated with the presence of proctitis (p = 0.02). Colorectal resection after creation of a diverting stoma was performed in 28 (78%) patients, with 7 (19%) having a less extensive resection and 6 (17%) having a more extensive resection compared with the surgical plan before stoma creation. Conclusion: A diverting stoma could potentially be an alternative to immediate definitive stoma placement in specific populations consisting of patients with luminal colonic CD, especially in the absence of proctitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review covers the problem of forming a diverting stoma during resections of the rectum with primary anastomosis. The incidence of rectal cancer tends to increase, and surgical resection remains the main method of treatment. Anastomotic leakage significantly increases the postoperative mortality. The most effective way to prevent severe complications is the formation of a diverting stoma. However, the indications, the choice of a specific technique and the timing of the stoma elimination are not clearly defined. This review discusses the state of the problem, special attention is paid to the choice of the level of stoma formation (ileostomy or transversostomy).

Background: Low colorectal anastomoses carry a high anastomotic leak (AL) rate (up to 20%) and thus are commonly diverted. Much less is known about mid-to-high colorectal anastomosis, which carries a leak rate of 2-4%. The objective of this study was to determine our AL rate after mid-to-high colorectal anastomosis and associated risk factors. Methods: A single center retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing left colonic resections with mid-to-high colorectal anastomosis (≥7 cm from the anal verge) from January 2008 to October 2017 was utilized. Main outcome, AL, defined as clinical suspicion supported by radiological or intraoperative findings, was calculated and risk factors assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: 977 patients were included; 487 (49.9%) were male, with a mean age of 59.8 (+/−12.1) years. Mean BMI was 27.5 (+/−5.5) kg/m2. Diverticular disease (67.5%), malignancy (17.4%), and inflammatory bowel disease (2.2%) were the main indications for resection. Mean length of stay was 6.7 (+/−4.5) days. 455 (46.8%) colonic resections were performed by laparoscopy, 283 (29.1%) by hand assisted surgery, 219 (22.5%) by laparotomy, and 16 (1.6%) by robotics. Majority of patients had complete donuts (99.6%) and a negative air leak test (97.7%). 149 patients (15.3%) underwent construction of a diverting stoma. The overall AL rate was 2.1% (n = 20). Increased BMI (>30 kg/m2), P =.02, was an independent risk factor for AL and a trend observed for positive air leak tests (P =.05), with other factors failing to achieve statistical significance. Conclusions: Patients with mid-to-high colorectal anastomosis have a 2% AL risk. Increased BMI was a risk factor for AL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Anastomotic leak is a feared complication in rectal cancer surgery, and a proximal diverting stoma to protect the rectal anastomosis is used to minimize its impact. We evaluated a novel technique that uses the da Vinci® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical) to reinforce the colorectal anastomosis and rectal staple line with sutures, and rectal resection and assessment of the anastomotic perfusion, using our Portsmouth protocol. Methods. During robotic rectal cancer surgery, we used indocyanine green to determine the level of transection and check the vascularity of the circular anastomosis. The distal transverse staple line and circular staple line of the colorectal anastomosis were reinforced with absorbable interrupted stitches (KHANS technique – Key enHancement of the Anastomosis for No Stoma). The integrity of the colorectal/anal anastomosis was also checked using the underwater air-water leak test, with concomitant flexible sigmoidoscopy to visualize the circular staple line. Results. Fifty patients underwent total mesorectal excision for cancer. Using the KHANS technique, we avoided a diverting stoma in all cases. One patient had a radiological leak, leading to a pelvic abscess. In 56% of cases, the anastomosis was within 5 cm of the anal verge. Median length of stay was 5 (3-34) days, with two 30-day readmissions. No 90-day mortality or 30-day reoperations were observed. Conclusion. The KHANS technique appears feasible, successful, and safe in decreasing the incidence of diverting stomas in rectal resections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Even though minor, stoma-related complications significantly impact quality of life, they are often excluded from clinical analyses that compare short-term postoperative outcomes of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. This study compares stoma-related complications between loop ileostomy and loop colostomy after rectal resection, including minor complications, and discusses the characteristics of diverting stoma types. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted in patients who underwent diverting stoma construction after rectal resection. Data on patient background and postoperative short-term outcomes, including stoma-related complications and morbidity after stoma closure, were collected and compared between loop ileostomy and loop colostomy groups. Morbidities of all severity grades were targeted for analysis. Results: A total of 47 patients (27 loop ileostomy, 20 loop colostomy) underwent diverting stoma construction following rectal resection. Overall stoma-related complications, incidence of skin irritation, high-output stoma, and outlet obstruction were significantly higher in the loop ileostomy group but high-output stoma and outlet obstruction were absent in the loop colostomy group. Regarding morbidity after stoma closure, operation times and surgical site infections were significantly higher in the loop colostomy group while anastomotic leakage after diverting stoma closure occurred (2 cases; 15%) in the loop colostomy group but not the loop ileostomy group. Conclusion: Because stoma-related complications were significantly higher in the loop ileostomy group, and even these minor complications may impair QOL, early loop ileostomy closure is recommended. For loop colostomy, stoma-related morbidities are lower but post-closure leakage is a calculated risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of transanal drainage tube (TDT) placement for preventing anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Method: PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to October 2021. Studies comparing outcomes following low anterior resection with or without TDT were included. The primary outcomes measured were anastomotic leakage rate, reoperation rate and anastomotic bleed rate. Results: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 16 observational studies (prospective or retrospective) involving 4560 patients satisfied the basic inclusion criteria. In RCTs, a TDT was associated with no statistically significant differences in anastomotic leakage (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.42–1.05, P = 0.08), reduction in reoperation (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.03–0.51, P = 0.004) and increased anastomotic bleeding rate (OR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.11–5.01, P = 0.03). In observational studies, a TDT was associated with significant reduction in anastomotic leak (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.30–0.64, P < 0.0001) and reoperation (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.33–0.69, P < 0.0001), with no statistically significant differences in anastomotic bleeding (OR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.20–8.30, P = 0.78). Conclusion: In RCTs, a TDT for rectal cancer was correlated with no detectable differences in anastomotic leakage and with an increased risk of anastomotic bleeding. In observational studies, a TDT was correlated with reduction in anastomotic leakage and no detectable differences in anastomotic bleeding. Both RCTs and observational studies demonstrated a comparable reduction in reoperation rate with TDT. These data in aggregate indicated that TDTs may not show superiority but emphasized differences between RCT and observational data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Ano‐rectovaginal fistulas (ARVF) are challenging for the surgeon. Most of the series mix aetiologies, leading to confusion with respect to the conclusion. The aim of this study was to assess the factors associated with the success of ARVF management following obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASIS). Methods: This retrospective multicentric study included all the patients undergoing surgery for ARVF identified by the hospital codes. Patients for whom the aetiology of ARVF was not OASIS were excluded. The major outcome measure was the success of the procedure. Results: Sixty patients with treated ARVF due to OASIS were identified. The success of overall management was 91.7%. Female patients underwent a mean of 2.5 (±1.7) procedures. A diverting stoma was formed in 29 patients (48.3%) of which 26 were closed at the end of the management period (89.7%). Of the 148 surgical procedures, only 55 were successful (37.2%). The order of the procedures (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.75–2.51) or the diverting stoma (OR = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.31–6.91) were not significantly associated with the success of the surgery. However, Martius flap (OR = 4.13; 95% CI: 1.1–15.54) and Musset procedures (OR = 5.79; 95% CI: 1.77–18.87) produced better results than the endorectal advancement flap (ERAF). The other procedures did not show a significant correlation with management success. Conclusion: A diverting stoma is not mandatory in the management of ARVF due to OASIS to improve the success of the surgical procedure. While the Martius flap procedure offers better results, the ERAF procedure may be preferred as a primary intervention in the absence of sphincter injury as it is less invasive. In cases of residual sphincter injury, the Musset procedure is most likely to be the best option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A consensus has been reached regarding diverting stoma (DS) construction in rectal cancer surgery to avoid reoperation related to anastomotic leakage. However, the incidence of stoma-related complications (SRCs) remains high. In this study, we examined the perioperative outcomes of DS construction in patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer., Methods: We included 400 participants who underwent radical sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer between 2005 and 2017. These participants were divided into the DS (+) and DS (-) groups, and the outcomes, including postoperative complications, were compared., Results: The incidence of ileus was higher in the DS (+) group than in the DS (-) group (P<0.01); however, no patients in the DS (+) group showed grade 3 anastomotic leakage. Furthermore, early SRCs were observed in 33 patients (21.6%) and bowel obstruction-related stoma outlet syndrome occurred in 19 patients (12.4%). There was no significant intergroup difference in the incidence of grade 3b postoperative complications. However, the most common reason for reoperation was different in the 2 groups: anastomotic leakage in 91.7% of patients with grade 3b postoperative complications in the DS (-) group, and SRCs in 85.7% of patients with grade 3b postoperative complications in the DS (+) group., Conclusion: Patients with DS showed higher incidence rates of overall postoperative complications, severe postoperative complications (grade 3), and bowel obstruction, including stoma outlet syndrome, than patients without DS. Therefore, it is important to construct an appropriate DS to avoid SRCs and to be more selective in assigning patients for DS construction.

Purpose: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common postoperative complication of rectal cancer, and transanal drainage tube (TDT) efficacy is still contentious. This study aimed to evaluate the TDT effect on AL prevention. Methods: All relevant papers were searched by using a predefined search strategy (two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one prospective study, and four retrospective studies). Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate AL and re-operation pooled rates. Results: A total of 7 studies (1556 patients) were included: No significant statistic difference was found between two groups on AL rate (odds ratio (OR) 0.61, P = 0.11) and re-operation rate (OR 0.52, P = 0.10). For subgroup analysis, significant statistic difference was found between two groups on AL rate (OR 0.29, P = 0.002) and re-operation rate (OR 0.15, P = 0.04) in patients without neoadjuvant therapy. As for patients without diverting stoma, the AL rate (OR 0.35, P = 0.002) was significantly lower than that in patients without TDT. Conclusions: TDT may reduce AL morbidity and re-operation rate for patients without high risk of AL, but may be useless for those in high-risk situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Theoretical advantages of Turnbull-Cutait pull-through delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) are a reduced risk of anastomotic leak and therefore avoidance of stoma. Gradually abandoned in favor of immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICAA) with diverting stoma, DCAA has regained popularity in recent years in reconstructive surgery for low RC, especially when combined with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The aim of this study was to perform the first meta-analysis, exploring the safety and outcomes of DCAA compared to ICAA with protective stoma. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases was performed for studies published from January 2000 until December 2020. The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review on Interventions recommendations and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Out of 2626 studies screened, 9 were included in the systematic review and 4 studies in the meta-analysis. Outcomes included were postoperative complications, pelvic sepsis and risk of definitive stoma. Considering postoperative complications classified as Clavien–Dindo III, no significant difference existed in the rate of postoperative morbidity between DCAA and ICAA (13% versus 21%; OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.38–3.62; p = 0.78; I2 = 20%). Patients in the DCAA group experienced a lower rate of postoperative pelvic sepsis compared with patients undergoing ICAA with diverting stoma (7% versus 14%; OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16–0.85; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). The risk of definitive stoma was comparable between the two groups (2% versus 2% OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.15–3.85; p = 0.75; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: According to the limited current evidence, DCAA is associated with a significant decrease in pelvic sepsis. Further prospective trials focusing on oncologic and functional outcomes are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We conducted the first prospective clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with obstructive colon cancer. Background: Obstructive colorectal cancer is locally advanced colorectal cancer with a poor prognosis. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for obstructive colon cancer is unclear. Methods: We conducted a single arm, multicenter trial involving patients from the Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group with obstructive colon cancer. All eligible patients underwent diverting stoma formation before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patient received 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6 followed by primary tumor surgery and then 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate of all intended neoadjuvant therapy. The study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000013198. Results: Between April 2014, and July 2016, 50 patients were registered, and 46 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The objective response rate as the primary endpoint was 67.4%. The most common grade >3 adverse event associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was neutropenia (28.3%). Forty-five patients underwent surgical resection of the primary lesion (R0 resection in all cases). Grade >2 surgery-related complications occurred in 7 patients (15.6%). The downstaging rate was 48.9%, and the moderate or greater regression rate was 52.2%; no cases showed pathological complete response. Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 was performed in 34 patients (75.6%). The 3-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 76.5% and 95.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using mFOLFOX6 was feasible and might be a treatment option for patients with obstructive colon cancer. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm the present findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To introduce a novel endo-luminal balloon-assisted drainage (EBAD) and compare postoperative complication rates between EBAD and diverting stoma (DS) groups. Methods: The single center prospective non-random cohort study included a total of 163 patients in convenience patients with rectal cancer between January 2019 and January 2021. Out of 163 patients, 83 underwent DS and 80 EBAD. Primary endpoints were postoperative complication rate. Results: The total number of complications was 28 in the DS group vs. 22 in the EBAD group (P = 0.388). 18 patients (21.7%) in the DS group and 14 patients (17.5%) in the EBAD group developed postoperative complication (P = 0.501). There were no differences identified for anastomotic leak rates between the two groups (P = 0.677). The rate of the pelvic abscess was lower in the EBAD group (1/80, 1.3%) than in the DS group (4/83, 4.8%) but with no statistical significance (P = 0.386). Compared with the DS group, the median operative time was shorter in the EBAD group (225 vs. 173.5 min, P < 0.001). Regarding incomplete small bowel obstruction, a higher prevalence was observed in the DS group compared to the EBAD group (7.2% vs 2.5%, P = 0.301). 7 patients (11.3%) in the DS group developed a para-stomal hernia, while no patient suffered a catheter-related complication. The median postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the DS groups than in the EBAD group (7 vs 8 days, P = 0.009). The median residence time of endo-luminal balloon-assisted drainage was 5.41 days. The median average and total volume of drainage were 51.57 ml/day and 255 ml, respectively. Conclusion: EBAD is feasible and safe with similar postoperative complications when compared with a DS. EBAD may replace DS after rectum resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications of rectal cancer surgery. A diverting ileostomy was constructed for the purpose of reducing anastomotic failure risk. Outlet obstruction (OO) is one of the complications of diverting stoma that results in a lack of fecal discharge from the stoma. Detailed etiologies and preventive measures for outlet obstruction have not yet been identified. Methods: We studied 125 patients who underwent rectal resection, anastomosis, and elective ileostomy. We evaluated the incidence of outlet obstruction and looked for any relationship between perioperative factors and outlet obstruction. Results: Outlet obstruction was detected in 20 cases (16.0%). Outlet obstruction occurred 9 days after surgery in most cases. Inserting a decompressing tube improved obstructive symptoms in 4 days. Patients were divided into two cohorts according to the occurrence of outlet obstruction. Postoperative hospital stay was longer in the outlet obstruction group (19 vs. 15 days; p = 0.0003). A multivariate analysis identified that younger patients, a postoperative thicker rectus abdominis muscle at the stoma passage and high output syndrome were independent risk factors for outlet obstruction. Conclusions: Younger patients, a postoperative thicker rectus abdominis muscle at stoma passage and high output syndrome were independent risk factors for outlet obstruction.

Abstract Background When considering “early stoma closure”, both standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria and standardized methods to assess anastomosis are necessary to reduce the risk of occult anastomotic leakage (AL). However, in the immediate postoperative period, neither have the incidence and risk factors of occult AL in patients with diverting stoma (DS) been clarified nor have methods to assess anastomosis been standardized. The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence and risk factors of occult AL in patients who had undergone rectal resection with DS and to evaluate the significance of computed tomography (CT) following water-soluble contrast enema (CE) to detect occult anastomotic leakage. Methods This was a single institutional prospective observational study of patients who had undergone rectal resection with the selective use of DS between May and October 2019. Fifteen patients had undergone CE and CT to assess for AL on postoperative day (POD) 7, and CT was performed just after CE. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the relationship between preoperative variables and the incidence of occult AL on POD 7. Results The incidence of occult AL on postoperative day 7 was 6 of 15 (40%). Hand-sewn anastomosis, compared with stapled anastomosis, was a significant risk factor. Five more cases with occult AL that could not be detected with CE could be detected on CT following CE; CE alone had a 33% false-negative radiological result rate. Conclusions Hand-sewn anastomosis appeared to be a risk factor for occult AL, and CE alone had a high false-negative radiological result rate. When considering the introduction of early stoma closure, stapled anastomosis and CT following CE could be an appropriate inclusion criterion and preoperative examination, respectively.

Background: Patients with rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection and diverting stomas often suffer from bowel dysfunction after stoma closure, impairing their quality of life. This study aims to develop a machine learning tool to predict bowel function after diverting stoma closure., Methods: Clinicopathological data and post-operative follow-up information from patients with mid-low rectal cancer after diverting stoma closure were collected and analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. A machine learning model was developed in the training set to predict major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and evaluated in the test set. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess clinical utility., Results: The study included 396 eligible patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection and diverting stoma in Tongji Hospital affiliated with Huazhong University of Science and Technology from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2020. The interval between stoma creation and closure, neoadjuvant therapy, and body mass index were identified as the three most crucial characteristics associated with patients experiencing major LARS in our cohort. The machine learning model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.83] in the training set (n=277) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70-0.79) in the test set (n=119), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.73 and 0.69, respectively, with sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.66 for the test set. DCA confirmed clinical applicability., Conclusions: This study developed a machine learning model to predict major LARS in rectal cancer patients after diverting stoma closure, aiding their decision-making and counseling., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-1019/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Diverting stoma has many complications and requires another operation. Ghost ileostomy is an option for occasional cases. We aimed to present the clinical data and early postoperative outcomes of our patients who had undergone ghost ileostomy. Ghost ileostomy was performed in 58 patients, depending on the level of the anastomosis, together with the experience and intraoperative decision of the surgeon. The patients were evaluated in terms of comorbidities, type of colorectal disease, and postoperative complications. Thirty-eight patients were male, the mean age was 59 ± 9 years, and the mean body mass index was 27 ± 5 kg/m2. Forty-six patients in whom a ghost ileostomy procedure was performed had sigmoid colon or proximal/middle rectal cancer, whereas eight patients had sigmoid diverticulitis, and four patients had ulcerative colitis. Anastomotic leakage was identified in 3 (5.1%) patients. In one patient, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage was performed, and ghost ileostomy was converted to diverting stoma, whereas in the other two patients, ghost ileostomy was converted to diverting stoma under local anesthesia. Ghost ileostomy can easily be converted to diverting stoma in some patients with no need for general anesthesia to reduce the morbidity of anastomotic leakage. With this method in selected patients, it is possible to avoid diverting stoma and unwanted complications of ileostomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A diverting stoma is created to prevent anastomotic leakage and related complications impairing sphincteric function in rectal surgery. However, diverting stoma may be left unclosed. This study is aimed to analyze preoperative factors including anorectal manometric data associated with diverting stoma non-reversal before rectal surgery. We also addressed complications related to diverting stoma in patients undergoing surgery for rectal malignant tumor. Methods: A total of 203 patients with rectal malignant tumor who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery with diverting stoma were retrospectively evaluated. The risk factors for non-reversal of diverting stoma were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. For these analyses, anorectal manometric data were measured before rectal surgery. The association between stoma-related complications and other clinicopathological features was also analyzed. Results: During the median follow-up of 46.4 months, 24% (49 patients) did not undergo stoma reversal. Among parameters that were available before rectal surgery, age ≥ 75 years, albumin < 3.5 g/dl, tumor size ≥ 30 mm, tumor distance from the anal verge < 4 cm, and maximum squeezing pressure (MSP) < 130 mmHg measured by anorectal manometry (ARM) were independent factors associated with stoma non-reversal. The most common stoma-related complication was peristomal skin irritation (25%). Ileostomy was the only factor associated with peristomal skin irritation. Conclusion: The current study demonstrated that low preoperative MSP evaluated by ARM, old age, hypoalbuminemia, and a large tumor close to the anus were predictive of diverting stoma non-reversal. Stoma site should be well deliberated when patients have the aforementioned risk factors for diverting stoma non-reversal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context When intestinal gangrene is evident or suspected, surgical laparotomy is mandatory where the affected segment is resected with a safety margin of 5–10 cm, and the remaining part is either anastomosed or diverted on anterior abdominal wall as stoma. Stomas protect against the risks of anastomotic leakage and permit close examination of the bowel by inspection and/or endoscopy; however, it affects the quality of life. Aims To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of patients of mesenteric vascular occlusion in relation to the method of surgical intervention with either primary anastomosis or diverting ileostomy. Settings and design The study was a prospective, randomized comparative study. It involved all eligible patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the study. It was conducted at Mansoura Emergency Hospital in the period from November 2016 till November 2019. Patients and methods A total of 100 patients were recruited into the current study and divided into two groups after resection of gangrenous part: stoma group and anastomosis group. Statistical analysis Data were fed to the PC and analyzed using SPSS, version 26.0. Results Overall, 100 cases had a mean age of 53.0±7.6 years, with the range of 38.0–77.0 years. It included 66 (66%) males and 34 (34%) females. The leakage rate was significantly higher in the anastomotic group (18 cases), whereas it was experienced only in two (4%) cases in the other group (P<0.001). Consequently, postoperative mortality was higher in the same group (nine cases) (P=0.025). Conclusions The diverting stoma appeared to be a safer procedure to perform in mesenteric vascular occlusion with respect to morbidity and mortality rates but needs a strict nutritional, psychological, and special home care to enhance quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Hartmann's procedure (HP) is performed for colorectal perforation to avoid the risk of anastomotic leakage. Few reports have compared the safety between primary anastomosis without diverting stoma (PAWODS) and HP for colorectal perforation, and whether PAWODS or HP should be performed has remained controversial. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of performing PAWODS in comparison to HP for colorectal perforation. Methods The data of 97 consecutive patients with colorectal perforation who underwent surgery from April 2010 to December 2020 were collected retrospectively. PAWODS and HP were performed in 51 and 46 patients, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients treated with PAWODS with those treated with HP. Results In the multivariate analysis, low serum albumin (hazard ratio (HR)=3.49; 95%CI=1.247-9.757; P=0.017) and left-sided colon and rectum perforation (HR=16.8; 95%CI=1.792-157.599; P=0.014) were significantly associated with the decision to perform HP. There was a significant difference in the mortality of the two groups (PAWODS vs. HP: 0% vs. 8.7%; P=0.047). The severe morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo III-V) was significantly higher in the HP group (PAWODS vs. HP: 10% vs. 30%; P=0.020). In the PAWODS group, anastomotic leakage occurred in five of 51 patients (9.8%), four (8.7%) of whom required re-operation. Conclusions In appropriately selected patients, PAWODS could be safely performed with an acceptable rate of anastomotic leakage. The serum albumin level and site of perforation may be simple and useful factors for guiding decision-making on the surgical procedure., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Omoto et al.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to reveal whether a transanal tube (TAT) could act as an alternative to a diverting stoma (DS) after laparoscopic low anterior resection. Patients and Methods: A total of 89 consecutive rectal cancer patients whose tumors were located within 15 cm from the anal verge who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection without a DS at our institution between May 12, 2015 and August 31, 2019 were included. All patients received a postoperative Gastrografin enema study (GES) through a TAT between the 3rd and 10th postoperative day. We planned two study protocols. From May 12, 2015 to March 31, 2017, we conducted a second operation including a DS construction immediately when radiological anastomotic leakage (rAL) was detected (Group A, n=46). From April 1, 2017 to August 31, 2019, we continued TAT drainage even if rAL was detected and repeated the GES weekly until the rAL was healed (Group B, n=43). Results: In Group A (n=46), 14 cases of rAL were included, 11 of which underwent stoma construction. The remaining 3 patients who refused stoma construction were treated conservatively. In Group B (n=43) rAL was encountered in 10, and 7 of these patients were treated successfully by TAT continuous drainage. The rate of DS in Group B (7.0%) was significantly lower than that in Group A (23.9%) (p=0.028). Conclusions: A TAT could act as a DS to mitigate the symptoms of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diverting stomata (DS) have been shown to mitigate the clinical impact of anastomotic leakage (AL) but not without complications, and their routine use remains a matter of international debate. The objective of this study was to examine the association between stomata and the clinical consequences of AL. Methods: This was a nationwide retrospective cohort study including all patients suffering from AL after low anterior resection from 2001 to 2010. Results: Four thousand sixty-three patients were treated in the period of whom 581 (11.9%) developed AL. In case of AL, patients without a diverting stoma had a slightly higher 90-day mortality rate (13.5% versus 8.7%, p = 0.089). Patients suffered more complications due to AL, both surgical (52% versus 28%, p < 0.001) and non-surgical (48% versus 35%, p = 0.004) with a higher Clavien-Dindo score. Twenty percent of patients developed stoma-related complications prior to stoma reversal. Mortality related to stoma reversal was 2.4%. Factors associated with a risk of a permanent stoma were age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.08), blood transfusion during primary surgery (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.16–4–78), conserved anastomosis after AL (HR 0.019, 95% CI 0.009–0.04), and a diverting stoma fashioned at the index operation (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26–0.97). Conclusion: The use of diverting stomata during low anterior resection mitigates the clinical impact of AL. However, this benefit needs to be balanced against the risk of stoma-related complications, seen in 20%, and mortality with stoma reversal (2.4%). Where practical, the decision to divert should be made pre-operatively in a multidisciplinary setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is arguably the most troublesome complication of anterior resection (AR). In recent years, however, indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been recently used to evaluate blood flow in the anastomosis site, and it has been suggested that AL may be predicted. We reported the effectiveness of predicting AL in colorectal cancer surgery by observing a quantitative laparoscopic ICG fluorescence imaging for the first time. The purpose of this study was to predict the risk of postoperative AL by quantitative laparoscopic ICG fluorescence imaging focused on the rectal stamp, which is one of the major causes of AL in AR, and to construct diverting stoma (DS) only in appropriate cases. Methods: We studied the 25 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic AR for rectal cancer at our hospital between July 2016 and June 2017. Before enforcing double-stapling technique anastomosis, we injected ICG intravenously, and laparoscopically evaluated blood flow on the rectal stump. We analyzed quantitatively the relationship between various parameters and AL. Results: Median T0, from when the ICG was injected intravenously and the ICG disappeared from the injection route to the rise of the histogram of intensity, in AL group was significantly longer than that in non-AL group (P = .03). There were no other significant differences between AL and non-AL groups. Conclusions: T0 was longer in patients with AL than in those without. If prolonged T0 can be recognized intraoperatively, it will be possible to construct DS for appropriate patients only. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: When considering "early stoma closure", both standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria and standardized methods to assess anastomosis are necessary to reduce the risk of occult anastomotic leakage (AL). However, in the immediate postoperative period, neither have the incidence and risk factors of occult AL in patients with diverting stoma (DS) been clarified nor have methods to assess anastomosis been standardized. The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence and risk factors of occult AL in patients who had undergone rectal resection with DS and to evaluate the significance of computed tomography (CT) following water-soluble contrast enema (CE) to detect occult anastomotic leakage.Methods: This was a single institutional prospective observational study of patients who had undergone rectal resection with the selective use of DS between May and October 2019. Fifteen patients had undergone CE and CT to assess for AL on postoperative day (POD) 7, and CT was performed just after CE. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the relationship between preoperative variables and the incidence of occult AL on POD 7.Results: The incidence of occult AL on postoperative day 7 was 6 of 15 (40%). Hand-sewn anastomosis, compared with stapled anastomosis, was a significant risk factor. Five more cases with occult AL that could not be detected with CE could be detected on CT following CE; CE alone had a 33% false-negative radiological result rate.Conclusions: Hand-sewn anastomosis appeared to be a risk factor for occult AL, and CE alone had a high false-negative radiological result rate. When considering the introduction of early stoma closure, stapled anastomosis and CT following CE could be an appropriate inclusion criterion and preoperative examination, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and hypothesis: We report the clinical outcome of surgical repair for rectovaginal fistula (RVF) carried out by one operative team. We also investigate the predictive factors for fistula healing. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 63 patients underwent local surgical repair of RVF during January 2008 and December 2017 by one operative group. The clinical features of the patients were reviewed. The association between fistula closure and diverse clinical parameters, including operative method, fistula location, prior repair, and diverting stoma, was analyzed. Results: Sixty-three consecutive patients underwent 80 local surgical repairs by our surgical team. Forty-five patients eventually healed after an average of 1.22 procedures. The overall success rate per procedure was 71.2%, whereas the closure rate of the first operation was 55.5% (n = 35). The etiology of the fistula did not impact on the success rate of surgical repair. The history of prior repair predicted a lower success rate on both overall procedure (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.41–0.85, p = 0.008) and the first repair in our institution (RR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.31–0.80, p = 0.003). There was no difference in closure rate between the stoma group and the non-stoma group. Nevertheless, among the 15 patients who underwent more than one operation in our center, a diverting stoma seemed to be necessary (10 patients healed in the stoma group and none of the patients healed in the non-stoma group, p = 0.02). Conclusions: History of prior surgical repair is a risk factor for failure. Diverting stoma did not increase the overall closure rate, but it seemed to be necessary for patients in whom the first operation failed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stoma rods are used traditionally to prevent retraction of loop stomas into the abdominal cavity. However, there is very little evidence to support or refute their use. The aim of the present systematic review and metaanalysis was to assess the current data on stoma rods in loop stomas. The primary outcomes were stoma necrosis and stoma retraction. Methods: A systematic review and metaanalyses were conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalysis guidelines (PRISMA). The study protocol was registered prospectively on PROSPERO. An electronic search was performed by two reviewers independently using predefined search strategy and Medline. Bibliographies of selected studies were screened for additional references. RevMan was used to generate forest plots and calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In total, five studies were identified that met inclusion criteria, including four randomized controlled trials. Three studies examined only ileostomies, while one included both colostomies and ileostomies, and one only examined colostomies. In total, 561 patients underwent a stoma with a rod compared to 443 without. There was a higher rate of dermatitis (rod 29.86% vs no rod 16% OR 2.65; 95% CI 1.79–3.93) and stoma necrosis (rod 7% vs no rod 1.15% OR 5.58; 95% CI 1.85–16.84) in the rod group, but there was no significant difference in stoma retraction (rod 2.28% vs no rod 3.45%; OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.32–1.54). Conclusions: Stoma rods do not reduce the incidence of stoma retraction and instead lead to increased rates of dermatitis and stoma necrosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diverting loop ileostomies have traditionally been fashioned in the right iliac fossa, but recently, a novel technique of midline loop ileostomy at the umbilical port site during laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been described. We aim to compare outcomes after creation and reversal of these two types of ileostomy. Using a retrospective study design, 10 consecutive patients who underwent a midline loop ileostomy were compared with 10 consecutive patients who underwent a traditional right iliac fossa stoma. Baseline characteristics, operating time, length of stay and complications for the initial operation as well as reversal of stoma operation were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in duration of operation or complication rate after the initial stoma formation, but length of hospital stay was longer in the traditional stoma group (10 vs 4.5 days, p = 0.04). After reversal of ileostomy, the traditional stoma group had a significantly higher perioperative complication rate compared to the midline stoma group (50 vs 0%, p = 0.03), but there was no difference in operation time or length of hospital stay. Midline diverting loop ileostomy is a safe technique with regard to formation, management and reversal when compared to a traditional right iliac fossa loop ileostomy. It is a potentially attractive alternative in the era of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A randomised controlled trial is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A loop colostomy may reduce the risk of severe intraabdominal complications in patients with obstructing colorectal cancer compared to an end colostomy. The aim of this study was to relate complications to the type of stoma, and a secondary aim was to evaluate whether the type of colostomy had an impact on time until oncological/surgical treatment.Methods: All patients who underwent surgery and received a deviating colostomy due to obstructing colorectal cancer between January 2011 and December 2015 in five Swedish hospitals in Region Västra Götaland were included (n = 289). Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Patients alive in the end of 2016 were contacted and were sent a questionnaire including questions about stoma function and health-related quality of life.Results: Some 289 patients were included; 147 received an end colostomy and 140 a loop colostomy. Two patients were excluded from the analysis due to missing data. There was no difference in complications at 90 days between the two groups, 44% (end colostomy) and 54% (loop colostomy) (odds ratio: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.49; 1.41). Time to start of treatment was similar in both groups. Patients with a loop colostomy had significantly higher stoma-related morbidity with retraction, prolapse, leakage and bandaging problems. No differences in quality of life were found.Conclusion: The hypothesis that a loop colostomy reduced complications could not be confirmed. An end colostomy should be the first choice in these patients particularly in patients who will have their colostomy for the remainder of their life to reduce stoma-related symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Sphincter-saving surgery is widely accepted operative modality to treat rectal cancer. It often requires temporary diverting stoma to avoid the complications of anastomotic failure. This study investigates the cumulative failure rate in sphincter preservation for rectal cancer and the risk factors associated with the permanent stoma.Methods: A retrospective study on 358 patients diagnosed with primary rectal cancer from 2009 to 2013 was conducted at a single institute. Three hundred and thirty-one out of 358 patients with rectal cancer located within 12 cm from the anal verge, who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery, were included in this study. The cumulative rate for permanent stoma was calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed, comparing the patients with stoma to the ones without.Results: Temporary diverting stoma was created in 223 (82%) patients. After median follow-up of 42 months, 18 patients (6.6%) persistently used temporary stoma or required re-creation of stoma. Univariate analysis revealed that BMI, tumor location below 4 cm from the anal verge, coloanal anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, and local recurrence were significantly associated with persistent use or re-formation of stoma. Multivariate analysis showed that anastomotic leakage (OR 50.3; 95% CI, 10.1-250.1; p < 0.0001) and local recurrence (OR 11.3; 95% CI, 1.61-78.5; p = 0.015) were the independent risk factors.Conclusion: Patients with anastomotic leakage and local recurrence are at high risk for permanent stoma. Not only should patients be fully informed of possible failure in sphincter preservation preoperatively, but also patient-oriented decision should be made on patient-tailored surgical plan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Fashioning a defunctioning stoma is common when performing an anterior resection for rectal cancer in order to avoid and mitigate the consequences of an anastomotic leakage. We investigated the permanent stoma prevalence, factors influencing stoma outcome and complication rates following stoma reversal surgery. Method Patients who had undergone an anterior resection for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2013 in the northern healthcare region were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and were followed until the end of 2014 regarding stoma outcome. Data were retrieved by a review of medical records. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate predefined risk factors for stoma permanence. Risk factors for non-reversal of a defunctioning stoma were also analysed, using Cox proportional-hazards regression. Results A total of 316 patients who underwent anterior resection were included, of whom 274 (87%) were defunctioned primarily. At the end of the follow-up period 24% had a permanent stoma, and 9% of patients who underwent reversal of a stoma experienced major complications requiring a return to theatre, need for intensive care or mortality. Anastomotic leakage and tumour Stage IV were significant risk factors for stoma permanence. In this series, partial mesorectal excision correlated with a stoma-free outcome. Non-reversal was considerably more prevalent among patients with leakage and Stage IV; Stage III patients at first had a decreased reversal rate, which increased after the initial year of surgery. Conclusion Stoma permanence is common after anterior resection, while anastomotic leakage and advanced tumour stage decrease the chances of a stoma-free outcome. Stoma reversal surgery entails a significant risk of major complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistula (RI-RVF) is a chronic and serious condition with a significant influence on quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistulas of patients previously undergoing radiotherapy. Methods: Fifty patients treated in the Gynaecological Radiotherapy Unit for gynaecologic malignancy and in the Department of General and Colorectal Surgery for RI-RVF between 2003 and 2013 were enrolled into a prospectively maintained database and underwent regular follow-up examinations in an outpatient clinic, during which surgical outcomes were assessed. Results: Median age was 60 years (range 40-84 years). Cervical cancer was the most common cause of radiotherapy. Median time of fistula development after radiotherapy was 20 months (range 5-240 months). In 48 (96%) patients, only faecal diversion could be performed, while two patients underwent rectal resection. The fistula healed in six patients. Factors that correlated with fistula healing were a distance from the anal verge above 7 cm ( p = 0.007 OR 18 95%CI 2.2609-14.3062) and creation of loop ileostomy ( p = 0.08 OR 17 95%CI 1.2818-23.9701), whereas a prolonged course of radiotherapy of more than 6 weeks ( p = 0.047) correlated negatively. In multivariate analysis, only distance from the anal verge remained significant ( p = 0.031 OR 2.35 95%CI 1.0422-5.2924). Conclusions: The treatment of radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas needs to be tailored individually to each patient. Faecal diversion remains the simplest and safest method of treating RI-RVF, especially in the group of patients who cannot undergo complicated surgical procedures, and offers acceptable quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer in order to help surgeons to decide which patients could benefit from a diverting stoma. Methods: Data on 319 patients having a middle and low rectal cancer resection with anastomosis between May 2011 and October 2015 from two hospitals were included in the study. The analysis included the following variables: patient-related variables (gender, age, diabetes mellitus, ASA score, preoperative radiochemotherapy, body mass index, blood hemoglobin, and serum albumin level), tumor-related variables (K-ras status, distance of tumor from the anal verge, histopathologic grade, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, pathological M stage, TNM stage, and tumor size), and surgery-related variables (laparoscopic or open surgery, blood loss, and operative time). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were carried out to identify risk factors for AL. Results: The AL rate was 11.91% (38/319). Male (OR 2.898, 95% CI 1.265-6.637, p = 0.012), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.482, 95% CI 1.004-6.134, p = 0.049), K-ras mutation (OR 2.544, 95% CI 1.210-5.348, p = 0.014), distance of tumor from the anal verge (OR 3.445, 95% CI 1.631-7.279, p = 0.001), and preoperative radiochemotherapy (OR 2.790, 95% CI 1.056-7.372, p = 0.039) were independent risk factors of AL. One (2.63%) in 38 patients with AL presented with no risk factor of AL, 6 (15.8%) in 38 patients with 1 risk factor, 16 (42.1%) in 38 patients with 2 risk factors, 9 (23.7%) in 38 patients with 3 risk factors, and 6 (15.7%) in 38 patients with 4 risk factors. No patient with 5 risk factors in our study. AL rate increased with the elevated number of risk factors clustering in individuals. Conclusions: K-ras mutation is first reported to be an independent risk factor for AL after sphincter-preserving surgery without diverting stoma. A diverting stoma should be performed in sphincter-preserving surgery for middle and low rectal cancer patients with 2 or more risk factors identified in this analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Obstructive colon cancer is locally advanced colon cancer with poor prognosis. However, the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on obstructive colon cancer remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of NAC in patients with obstructive colon cancer., Methods: From January 2012 to December 2017, we collected patient data for clinical stage II/III obstructive colon cancer at seven Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG) institutions. The long-term outcomes of the NAC and non-NAC groups were analyzed retrospectively after adjusting for patients' background characteristics using propensity score matching., Results: Among the 202 eligible patients, propensity score matching extracted 51 patients each for the NAC and non-NAC groups. After matching, the groups showed no marked differences in the background factors. All the patients in the NAC group underwent diverting stoma construction. Nineteen patients (37.3%) experienced grade 3-4 adverse events during NAC. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between groups. The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 75.8% in the NAC group and 63.0% in the non-NAC group ( p  = 0.22, log-rank test). The 5-year overall survival rates were 88.5% in the NAC group and 78.8% in the non-NAC group ( p  = 0.09, log-rank test)., Conclusion: Although NAC was feasible for obstructive colon cancer after diverting stoma construction, its effects on long-term outcomes could not be proven., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article. Itaru Endo and Jun Watanabe are editorial board members of the Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery., (© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.)

Background: This clinical study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of COVA+™, a collagen membrane (CM), for the prevention of postoperative adhesions in abdominal surgery.Methods: This prospective multicenter study concerned one hundred and thirteen patients undergoing two-stage abdominal surgeries between 2011 and 2014: either bariatric surgery (BS) or reversal of a diverting stoma (DS). They were divided into two groups, according to whether a CM was placed at the end of the first procedure or not. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of adhesions (incidence, severity, and extent) on the operative site during the second surgery using standard grading scales and a combined adhesion score. Secondary endpoints were the duration of reoperation and the overall postoperative morbidity.Results: Sixty-five patients were included in the BS group, and forty-eight patients in the DS group. Mean time interval between surgeries was 33.2 ± 51.1 weeks for BS and 14.1 ± 10 weeks for DS. In both indications, results in the CM group were better compared to the control group regarding incidence, severity, and extent of adhesions. Mean combined adhesion scores were lower in the CM group: respectively, 2.1 ± 1.6 versus 3.6 ± 1.7 (p < 0.001) for BS and 1.1 ± 1.7 versus 3.1 ± 2.2 (p < 0.005) for DS. In BS group, the operative duration at reoperation was significantly shorter if a CM was used: 56 ± 34 versus 77 ± 47 min (p < 0.03). No adverse events related to the use of the CM were observed. Overall complication rate was 13.5 % in the CM group versus 27.9 % in the control group. Ease of handling and application of the CM were rated as satisfying or very satisfying in the great majority of cases.Conclusions: In abdominal surgery, COVA+™ acts efficiently on the prevention of postoperative adhesions with lower incidence, severity, and extent levels. The CM can be used safely and might render reoperations less difficult. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A diverting temporary stoma is frequently used to decrease the chance of anastomosis leakage in the middle and lower rectum cancer surgeries, but its role in preventing the leakage is still doubtful. This study has been designed to evaluate any possible anastomosis complications after a rectum resection and a low or ultralow anastomosis when no diverting stoma is applied in patients with rectal cancer. Twenty-eight patients suffering from rectal cancer were treated by a low anterior resection between the years 2005 and 2008 in Imam Reza University Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Out of the 28 patients, 6 patients had already undergone a course of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Anastomosis was performed manually in 23 patients, using a stapler in 5 of them. None of the patients had a diverting stoma. Then, the outcome was evaluated. Fecal incontinence occurred in one of the patients (6.7 %) who had already undergone a course of radiotherapy preoperatively and had a stapler used for anastomosis. No leakage was detected in any of them. The very low incidence of complications in this study, such as those not preventable by a diverting stoma, suggest a very low chance of leakage in low or ultralow anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer and in those who were treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]