Search

The occupational exposure of caregivers to antineoplastic agents has been demonstrated since 1979. Since the early 1990s, numerous studies from several countries have demonstrated the contamination of care facilities by antineoplastic drugs. As it is easier to sample, most contamination measurements in workers are carried out in urine sample. The distribution and elimination half-lives of irinotecan suggest that blood can be considered as better than urine for the biomonitoring of a potential contamination of healthcare workers. We describe here the development and the validation of a UHPLC-MS/MS method to simultaneously quantify irinotecan, and two of its main metabolites, APC and SN-38, at ultra-trace levels in plasma and red blood cells (RBC). This method has been applied to blood samples collected from several healthcare services in a French comprehensive cancer center. The results demonstrate that the method is sensitive enough to identify a contamination of healthcare workers by irinotecan and SN-38 at very low concentrations. Moreover, the results show that analysis of RBC is of great interest and complementary to that of serum., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Healthcare workers are exposed to hazardous drugs such as antineoplastic drugs, which have potential carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects. Protective measures must be taken after appropriate staff training to handle antineoplastic drugs in a safe way. The objective was to assess perception, knowledge, practices and training regarding the risk of exposure of healthcare workers in three French compounding units., Methods: This descriptive study was based on a questionnaire made of 33 questions divided into five sections related to the handling of antineoplastic drugs: perception of the risks, knowledge of the risks, protection practices, specific training and general questions., Results: Among the 39 participants, over half considered their overall risk of exposure to antineoplastic drugs not being very low. Inhalation was known to 69.2% of them as possible route of contamination. The breakroom was identified by 28.9% of them as a place of contamination. The procedure in case of accidental exposure to antineoplastic drugs was known by 69.2%, but only half could explain it. Only 38.5% said they changed their gloves every 30 min as recommended. Barely half said that they had been trained specifically for the handling of antineoplastic drugs during an initial training. Over half wished to be informed, trained and aware of the proper handling of antineoplastic drugs., Conclusion: Although some of these results are encouraging, specifically when compared to the other settings where antineoplastic drugs are handled, there is still room for improvement. Efforts to build an adapted and impactful training program must pursue., Clinical Trial Registration: Study CONTACT, ref. 19-504., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: Carry out a national inventory of the current situation regarding the quality management of the investigational health products circuit, to develop adapted standardised tools., Methods: A survey of 76 questions, developed by a regional working group, was conducted among clinical research pharmacists in French facilities. Tools were developed to meet the identified needs and validated by participating pharmacists, using the Delphi method. The consensus was defined by achieving a score above 80% on relevance, clarity and evaluability., Results: Among 94 pharmacists participating in the survey, 88 were interested in standardised tools. The score for the implementation of a quality approach depended on the type of health facility (P<0.0005) and increased with the number of active trials (P<0.0005). All nine proposed tools were useful for over two thirds of pharmacists, but the self-assessment and audit grids have been prioritised. Indeed, only 26% of pharmacies carried out a prior risk assessment and 14% carried out internal audits. The review of both grids led to a consensus on 89% and 97% of the criteria respectively. The validated grids include 62 and 72 criteria respectively., Discussion: The quality approach of the investigational health products circuit is heterogeneous in the participating centres, with a strong need for standardised tools. The two grids are relevant tools developed by and for professionals., Conclusion: The tools developed will enable to optimise the quality approach by identifying the non-conformities of the investigational health products circuit., (Copyright © 2021 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Caregivers in healthcare settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination which can lead to adverse health effects. Biological monitoring is necessary to estimate the actual level of exposure of these workers. This study was conducted with the aim of assessing blood contamination levels by irinotecan and its metabolites of pharmaceutical staff operating inside and outside a compounding unit., Methods: The study took place within the pharmaceutical unit of a French comprehensive cancer centre. Blood samples were collected from the pharmacy workers operating inside and outside the compounding unit, and analysed by UHPLC-MS/MS. Plasma and red blood cell irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38; APC) were determined with a validated analytical method detection test., Results: A total of 17/78 (21.8%) plasma and red blood cell-based assays were found to be contaminated among staff. Overall, the total number of positive assays was significantly higher for staff members working outside the compounding unit than for workers working inside it ( P  = 0.022), with respectively 5/42 (11.9%) and 12/36 (33.3%) positive assays. For plasma dosages, the "outside" group had a significantly higher number of positive assays ( P  = 0.014). For red blood cell-based assays, no significant difference was found ( P  = 0.309)., Conclusions: This study reveals that pharmaceutical staff serving in health care settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination, not only inside the compounding room but also in adjacent rooms. The results would help to raise awareness and potentially establish protective measures for caregivers working in areas close to the compounding room as well.

Background: Antineoplastic drug exposure is a major problem in regard to caregivers' health. The aim of the present study was to assess the perception, knowledge, and handling practices of all occupation level categories of two oncology day hospitalization units and two compounding units regarding the risk of exposure to antineoplastic drugs., Methods: This descriptive study, performed through face-to-face interviews, concurrently assessed the perception, knowledge, and handling practices of antineoplastic drugs in five different job categories in four different settings. This work was part of a larger comprehensive project examining surface and blood contamination. Different scores were assigned to evaluate responses to a questionnaire about the perception, knowledge, and handling practices of healthcare workers, a risk global score including a risk perception score, and education/knowledge and handling practices scores., Results: In the survey, continuous training was associated with the global risk score ( p  = 0.03), particularly with the handling practices risk score ( p  = 0.01). Job category was also significantly associated with the global risk score ( p  < 0.001), particularly with the handling practices risk score ( p  < 0.001) and the education/knowledge score ( p  < 0.001). Pharmacy technicians had the highest score regarding risk perception (71.4%), indicating a higher perception of risk, and had a lower score regarding handling practices (25.0%) as well as a lower score (15.7%) regarding risk knowledge. Nurses and physicians had a high score (50%) regarding the risk of handling practices and a score of 57.1% regarding risk perception, indicating an increased perception of safety. Auxiliary caregivers had the highest global score (43.5%) and a score of 30.0% regarding handling practices., Conclusions: This study identified significant differences among healthcare workers depending on job categories in the antineoplastic drug handling practices and in the knowledge of the risks associated with occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs. These differences were particularly important between trained and untrained participants, revealing the importance of implementing a continuous training program.

Objective: We implemented the two-step OPTIMA program to anticipate chemotherapy prescription which aims to assess the discrepancy rate between anticipated and real prescription and its impact on waiting time and quality of care., Methods: This prospective study included cancer patients receiving any intravenous chemotherapy. The OPTIMA program consists in a nurse phone call and a blood sample two days before the planned treatment. Collected information and biological results were used by a physician to issue a non-effective (step 1) or effective (step 2) anticipated prescription the day before the consultation. The real prescription was given as usual by another physician on the day of the consultation. Waiting time was collected, and patients' satisfaction with care was assessed with the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire., Results: Respectively, 540 and 979 consultations (283 and 294 patients) were analysed in both steps. The discrepancy rate was 8.7% (step 1). In routine practice, the OPTIMA program (step 2) reduced patients' waiting time (median time 55 vs. 95 min, p < 0.001). A high general care satisfaction score was observed in both steps (80.7% and 80.2%)., Conclusions: This anticipation program demonstrated the accuracy of chemotherapy prescription, whatever the regimen and cancer site, and its impact on waiting time optimisation., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: During hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), caregivers are exposed by different routes to cytotoxic drugs. This review proposes an overview of the safety of HIPEC by assessing existing data on protection procedures, biological and non-biological samples. Based on these data, relevant good practices, eventual irrelevant overprotection procedures and missing data to implement adapted protections are highlighted., Materials and Methods: Data were extracted from a systematic review of literature from 1980 till 2016: number and type of surgical procedure, healthcare professionals present, protective equipment, samples, pre-analytical method and analytical method., Results and Discussion: Only 55 HIPEC procedures have been evaluated. The majority of antineoplastic drugs used have all required characteristics to penetrate the organism and are recognized as very dangerous. Moreover, a great heterogeneity in protective equipment used, either individual or collective is observed. Environmental contamination occurs during HIPEC, especially for all surfaces in the operating room. Compounds penetration into caregivers lungs cannot be excluded. Priority remains to prove professionals contamination by focusing on biological samples. Biological material is rarely sampled or samples are not necessarily adapted., Conclusion: Repeated blood tests should be preferred using appropriate sampling schedules and validated sensitive analytical methods. Furthermore, there is a great need of new biological indicators to monitor caregivers exposure. During hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), healthcare workers are exposed by different routes to cytotoxic drugs. There are currently few available occupational exposure data and environmental monitoring and biomonitoring must be improved in order to ensure optimal protection against antineoplastic drugs., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The increasing prescription of oral anticancer therapies has significantly changed inpatient care to outpatient care. This transformation requires an excellent coordination between different professionals to ensure healthcare channel security., Method: We performed a prospective study in 18 French cancer centers from March to April 2016. The aim of this study was to identify resources deployed to support patients receiving oral anticancer therapies and to assess pharmacist's involvement., Results: More than half of the centers have developed patient education program and/or practice pharmaceutical consultations. In total, 54.5% have deployed an oral anticancer drugs program and the pharmacist is involved in multidisciplinary teams. In total, 44.4% of the centers have developed hospital-to-community coordination actions but all of them highlight the time-consuming character of those programs., Discussion: Administrative burdens are seriously hindering patient education program's development. Multidisciplinary consultations can offer an attractive alternative because of easy implementation modalities. Finally, hospital-to-community coordination actions seem hard to implement and require harmonization of communication practices, and need more technical and financial means., (Copyright © 2017 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The World Health Organization has defined quality of life as "the perception of an individual, his/her place in life, in the context of the culture and the system of values in which he/she lives and in relation to his/her objectives, expectations, standards and concerns". The quality of life of the schizophrenic patients has been largely studied for the evaluation of their medical, social and therapeutic needs. The impact of neuroleptics, in particular atypical neuroleptics, on the subjective quality of life of these patients remains to be specified. The aim of this study was to compare the subjective quality of life of schizophrenic patients treated with classical neuroleptics (CN) or atypical neuroleptics (AN)., Methods: One hundred patients meeting DSM IV criteria for the diagnosis of schizophrenia (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) were included in the study. Sixty-four schizophrenic patients were treated with CN and thirty-six with AN. The symptomatology of the patients was assessed using the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale, (PANSS, Kay et al., 1987) and the Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome (SDS, Kirkpatrick et al., 1989). The extra-pyramidal symptoms were assessed using the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (Chouinard et al., 1980). The Subjective quality of life was studied using the Lehman Quality of Life Interview (QOLI, Lehman, 1988) translated and validated in France., Results: The patients treated by CN did not differ from the patients treated by AN in terms of severity of the positive and negative symptoms. The patients treated with AN presented significantly less extrapyramidal side effects than the patients treated with CN. No significant difference in terms of quality of life was found between both groups of patients., Conclusion: The kind of neuroleptic (CN vs AC) does not seem to influence the quality of subjective life of schizophrenic patients.

Purpose: To evaluate the economic impact and the bacterial resistance rates after 2 years of a rationalized antibiotic prescription program in a 502-bed hospital., Current Knowledge and Key Points: Prescribing protocols were established by consensus in 1998 and were reinforced a year later by nominative dispensing of the most costly antibiotics. The impact of the program was assessed in terms of changes in the overall cost of antibiotics and in the pattern of bacterial resistance among pathogens isolated in the institution, during the period prior to the onset of the program (1997) and its realization (1998 and 1999)., Future and Projects: The expenses for antibiotic drugs decreased by 46% in 2 years. Resistance rates among the different pathogens studied have remained stable. No increase of mortality was observed. Our rational policy in antibiotic therapy had a positive economic impact. However, new additional measures should be encouraged to prevent antimicrobial resistance.

We report four anaphylactoid reactions after intravenous administration of a cremophor-containing multivitamin hydrosol (Hydrosol Polyvitaminé Roche), observed over an 8-month period in a small region of France. The reactions occurred immediately following intravenous infusion of either ionic solutions or parenteral nutrition mixture containing the multivitamin solution. In three cases, erythema and dyspnoea appeared within minutes. The infusion was rapidly stopped and corticosteroids were given to two patients. The fourth patient had erythema and swelling of the face within 30 min of infusion, and severe bronchoconstriction and hypotension within 60 min, before infusion was stopped. In-vivo histamine release from mast cell was proved. These reactions are highly suggestive of an anaphylactoid mechanism, due to the multivitamin solution, as all the other drugs were continued without subsequent reactions. The responsible agent is thought to be polyethoxylated castor oil (Cremophor EL), as it is known to produce such effects. Medical practitioners should evaluate the risk/benefit ratio each time they give this drug.