Search

Copyright of German International Journal of Modern Science / Deutsche Internationale Zeitschrift für Zeitgenössische Wissenschaft is the property of Artmedia24 and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

I denne artikkelen undersøker vi mekanismer for prioritering i den kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenesten. Vi diskuterer hvordan narrativet om behovet for å redusere helse- og omsorgstjenestene presenteres som en udiskutabel sannhet basert på en oppfatning om at offentlige helse- og omsorgstjenester representerer en utgift, mens annen virksomhet er verdiskapende, i stedet for å se disse som gjensidig avhengig av hverandre. Dette legitimerer en nedprioritering av offentlige helse- og omsorgstjenester, og sentrale politiske spørsmål depolitiseres som følge av at problemstillingen naturaliseres og fremstilles som at det ikke finnes andre alternativer til løsning enn å nedprioritere. Ved å trekke på kulturelle og kjønnede forståelser av arbeid diskuterer vi hvordan hjelpebehov og kompetanseområder usynliggjøres og slik muliggjør en overføring av ansvar for hjelp og tjenester fra det offentlige og over på personene med et hjelpebehov, deres pårørende og sivilsamfunnet.

Am Beispiel des österreichischen Wissenschaftskabarett-Ensembles „Science Busters“ geben die Autor*innen des Beitrags einen Einblick in die kommunikative und konzeptionelle Vielschichtigkeit einer Wissenschaftskommunikation, die außerhalb institutionsspezifischer Räume und Gegebenheiten stattfindet. Zielgruppe der Angebote sind wissenschaftsexterne Personen. Im Zentrum steht nicht das Vermitteln von Wissenschaftsinhalten, sondern das Erzählen von Geschichten, die wissenschaftliche Inhalte transportieren. Wesentlich sind dabei die humorvolle Darstellung und Interaktion. Die Autor*innen betonen, dass sich Humor und Wissenschaft keinesfalls widersprechen müssen. Darüber hinaus beleuchtet der Beitrag konkrete Kommunikationsstrategien der Science Busters (wie z.B. den dramaturgisch inszenierten Dialog), die auf der Kabarettbühne Anwendung finden, um dem Publikum einen besseren Zugang zu wissenschaftlichen Fragestellungen und Erkenntnissen zu ermöglichen. (Red.)

The aim of the article is to explore constructions of the disciplinary measure emergency school, understood as an institutionalization of the policy for and the public discourse about “forceful measures for safety and discipline” in schools. Theoretical approach is critical policy analysis. The empirical material consists of, in this context, relevant policy documents, Swedish media discourses and international research. Emergency schools have made a rapid journey through the Swedish school-institutional landscape. From loosely defined local inventions, with a plenty of labels to being constructed as a matter of national urgency. The public discourse has rapidly evolved from stressing that the goal of emergency schools is to offer support to students at-risk (discourse of equity) in a secluded environment to becoming a site where rowdy, violent and criminal students at least temporary can be evacuated (discourse of safety). The question of knowledge is completely absent from public discourse and from the policy foundations. One of the risks with emergency school, apart from anticipated stigmatization and negative impact on learning progress, is that its sheer existence can negatively affect the primary responsibility of ordinary schools for safety, positive school climate and equity of all students. The pressing issue to be raised is not just what emergency schools do with their students, but also what they do with the ordinary schools’ overall responsibility for safety and positive school climate.

Der Koran und die vorislamisch-arabische Dichtung sind durch diskursive Intertextualität miteinander verbunden. Obwohl der Koran keine Dichtung ist und Muḥammad andere Ziele verfolgte als die Dichter, wurde er von seiner Umgebung als einer von ihnen angesehen. Der Koran weist diesen Vorwurf vehement zurück, zeigt jedoch auffällige philologische Ähnlichkeiten zur Dichtung, übernimmt Motive und invertiert Ideen aus den Gedichten. Eine zentrale Frage in diesem intertextuellen Zusammenhang ist die Glaubwürdigkeit der koranischen Verkündigung. Aus diesem Grund betont der Koran in den mekkanischen Suren auf mehreren Ebenen die Abgrenzung Muḥammads von den Dichtern. Dies wird besonders deutlich in Sure 26, Sūrat aš-Šuʿarāʾ. Hier wird bekräftigt, dass die Verkündigung göttlichen Ursprungs ist und keinesfalls mit satanischer Inspiration verwechselt werden darf. Der Koran führt sieben Episoden an, um die Einordnung von Muḥammads Sendung in die biblische und altarabische Tradition der Prophetie zu untermauern. Das aus diesem Kontext entstandene Prophetenparadigma wird abschließend in Kontrast zur Darstellung der Dichter als Herumirrende und Lügner gesetzt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Sport Culture & Science (IntJSCS) is the property of International Journal of Sport Culture & Science (IntJSCS) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Berliner Journal für Soziologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Dieser Beitrag nimmt im wissenschaftlichen Interesse an Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung (BNE) Lehr- und Lernpraxen von Lehramtsstudierenden mit Fach Sport bezüglich der Förderlichkeit ihrer Vorbildrolle in den Blick. Die Forschung geht der praxeologischen Frage nach, ob nachhaltiges Handeln in Sportpraktiken aus Lehramtsstudierenden nachhaltige Subjekte macht. Das in einer Projektlehrveranstaltung theoretisch geweckte und über sozio-körperliche Bewegungspraktiken entfaltete Verständnis von nachhaltiger Entwicklung wird im Kontext zukunftsgerichteter transformatorischer Bildung empirisch vor dem Hintergrund ausgelotet, wie Praktiken konstitutiv in das individuelle Weltverständnis hineinspielen. Dabei veranschaulichen in Gruppengesprächen hervorgebrachte Diskurse über Nachhaltigkeitspraktiken, wie der Umgang mit Lernprozessen in die Bildung von Subjektpositionen hineinspielt und wie Subjektivierungsweisen zu Annahme oder Zurückweisung nachhaltiger Entwicklungsförderung im Schulsport führen.

Copyright of Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Selv om verken medisin, lov, religion eller et bestemt ideologisk livssyn kan forklare alle perspektivene i abortdebatten og hevde en ugjenkallelig etisk riktig side, preges «pro-life»-diskursen ofte av harde, ensformede oppfatninger og standpunkter som presenteres som de eneste sanne og etisk riktige. Som i alle andre diskurser spiller metaforer en viktig rolle, for de kan fremkalle sterke følelser og gjøre påstander overbevisende. Målet med artikkelen er å vise frem og analysere diskurser i to forskjellige sammenhenger, nemlig i Serbia og Norge, for å undersøke om «pro-life»-diskurser skiller seg fra hverandre når det gjelder i hvilken grad de hevder retten til den eneste sannheten, og dermed retten til fullstendig makt.

Based on current results of the study »Flight Migration as Transition among Families with a Child with Disability«, this paper discusses disability as a practice in the context of flight migration and the complex interaction of discourse participation barriers. On the basis of two presented families with a history of flight migration and a child with disabilities, the effectiveness of disability for the transition of flight migration is worked out. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The governments of Finland and Sweden report annually on state-owned companies. The reporting aims to motivate and legitimize state ownership and thus constitutes an example of sustainable public communication. In this article, we compare how the impact of the covid-19 pandemic shows in the sub-genre company overview, i. e. the parts of the reports where the profile and performance of individual companies are presented. The study is motivated by the fact that the pandemic has had significant economic and operational consequences although national strategies for coping with the pandemic have been different. The results show that the pandemic is represented in the company overviews of both countries mainly as a cause whose consequences are described in different ways. The negative consequences of the pandemic are emphasized, whereas positive consequences are downplayed, and neutral ones play a smaller role. Overall, the pandemic discourse in the company overviews is predominantly an economic discourse.

I denne artikkelen diskuteres det hvordan forfatterne i Den Norske Turistforenings årbøker i perioden 1868–1979 tillegger mening til turer i natur. Hovedfokuset er rettet mot hvordan denne meningskonstruksjonen forholder seg til begrepene «idrett», «sport» og «friluftsliv». Slik kartlegges en betydningsfull gruppes meningsdannelse knyttet til friluftsliv i et historisk perspektiv. Funnene i undersøkelsen tyder på at for skribentene har det hatt liten eller ingen betydning hvorvidt turene har blitt omtalt som idrett, sport eller friluftsliv. Begrepet «friluftsliv» er svært lite brukt i perioden 1868–1920, hvor «sport» var den foretrukne termen. Uavhengig av språkbruk tillegger skribentene mening til sine turer blant annet gjennom fortellinger om kroppslig utfoldelse, naturopplevelse, nasjonalfølelse, åndelig og legemlig sunnhet, samt aktivitetens verdi i seg selv. Skribentene som skriver etter Nansens tale «Friluftsliv» i 1921, er i liten grad opptatt av Nansens betoning av naturopplevelse fremfor konkurranse som distinksjon mellom sport/idrett og friluftsliv. Det er med andre ord ikke belegg for å si at det etter talen skjedde et skifte. Nansens tanker ser tvert imot ut til å ha lite resonans blant skribentene i årbøkene. Gjennom deres utsagn blir det ikke gjort grunnleggende, meningsbærende distinksjoner som konstituerer friluftsliv som noe vesentlig annet enn idrett/sport. Fortellinger om en friluftslivstradisjon som kan spores ubrutt fra Nansen til våre dager, kan i så måte, på et diskursivt nivå, forstås som en opphavsmyte hvor én persons innflytelse overdrives. Som praksis har turer i natur, for turens egen del, tradisjon tilbake til tidlig på 1800-tallet. Diskursivt har måten mange snakker om friluftsliv på i dag, som noe vesentlig annet enn idrett/sport, spredd seg gradvis i Norge fra rundt 1970.

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)