Search

Background: The optimal approach for anticoagulation in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a subject of debate. A meta-analysis using updated evidence to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with AF and bioprosthetic valves to address this controversy. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up until March 2023. The search aimed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety outcomes of both direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes of interest were major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Results: Our study demonstrated that despite the difference was not significant, the hazard of all-cause mortality was 2.5% higher in the DOAC group (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = [0.88, 1.19], p-value =.75). Similarly, the hazard of stroke (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = [0.87, 1.32], p-value =.71) and major bleeding (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = [0.89, 1.38], p-value =.36) were found to be respectively 3.2 and 10.7% higher in the DOAC group, although the difference was not significant. However, the hazard of intracranial hemorrhage was found to be 28.8 lower in the DOAC treatment group (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = [0.39, 1.31], p-value =.27), which again was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that in patients undergoing bioprosthetic valve surgery and presenting with AF afterward, DOAC and VKA are similar regarding life-threatening and all-cause mortality outcomes, including major bleeding, stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis (MS) are listed as a contraindicated population to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) because of the traditional tenet of high stroke risk, despite scarce evidence. With accumulating data, we sought to conduct a systematic meta-analysis to preliminarily explore the efficacy and safety of DOAC versus warfarin in patients with AF and concomitant significant MS. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase databases, and the Cochrane Library (assessed October 10th, 2022) for eligible studies. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were synthesized in Stata 16.1 (StataCorp). Results: In random-effects meta-analyses, DOACs demonstrated a similar risk of stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.09–2.96), all-cause death (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.35–1.87), major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.24–1.39), and silent cerebral ischemia (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.64–1.58) when compared with warfarin. Conclusions: DOACs were similar to warfarin in the efficacy and safety profiles in patients with AF and concomitant significant MS. Future evidence is expected from other large trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Prevention of stroke by anticoagulation is essential in patients with Atrial fibrillation (AF); with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) being preferred over warfarin in most patients. The Long-term efficacy and safety of DOACs vs. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) remain unknown. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) were searched from inception to February 10th, 2021. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes included incidence of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and systemicembolism. The safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding (a composite of major or minor clinically relevant bleeding). RESULTS: A total of three studies with 3039 participants (LAAO = 1465; DOACs = 1574) were included. Mean age was 74.2 and 75.3 years in the LAAO and DOAC group respectively. Average follow-up period was 2 years. There was no difference in terms of cardiac mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.40-2.03; p = 0.81), ischemic stroke/TIA (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.80-1.65; p = 0.46; I 2 = 0) and clinically significant bleeding (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50-1.17; p = 0.22; I 2 = 69) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AF, LAAO was comparable to DOACs with similar efficacy and safety profiles.

• Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of dementia. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of new all-cause dementia and vascular dementia in AF patients, treated with either DOAC or VKAs. • This propensity-score matched analysis showed that among AF patients, treatment with a DOACs for a period of 10 years was associated with lower risk of all-cause dementia and vascular dementia compared to VKA treatment. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of dementia. Whether direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) reduce this risk compared to vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of new all-cause dementia and vascular dementia in AF patients, treated with either DOAC or VKAs. Anonymized electronic medical records from the TriNetX federated research network were used. AF patients treated with DOACs within 1 month of AF diagnosis, were 1:1 propensity score-matched with those treated with a VKA. The analysis included patients who completed 5 and 10 years of follow-up and were assessed for all-cause dementia and vascular dementia. Cox proportional hazard models were used to hazard ratios (HR), respectively with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among patients who completed 5 years of follow-up, after propensity score matching the final cohort consisted of 215,404 well-matched AF patients. All-cause dementia was diagnosed in 4,153 (3.9%) patients among those treated with DOACs and 4,150 (3.9%) among the VKA-treated patients (HR: 1.01, 95%CI: 0.96–1.05). Among patients 65–74 years old who were followed, DOAC treatment was associated with lower risk of dementia compared to VKAs (HR: 0.72; 95%CI: 0.59–0.86). Among patients who completed 10 years of follow-up, after propensity score matching the final cohort consisted of 19,208 well-matched AF patients. All-cause dementia was diagnosed in 314 (3.3%) patients among those treated with DOACs and 451 (4.7%) among the VKA-treated patients. DOAC treatment was associated with significantly lower risk of all-cause dementia during a follow-up period of 10 years compared to VKA treatment (HR: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.62–0.83), which remained consistent in patiens ≥65 years old. This propensity-score matched analysis showed that among AF patients, treatment with a DOACs for a period of 10 years was associated with lower risk of all-cause dementia and vascular dementia compared to VKA treatment, an effect which was not apparent in those treated for shorter duration. This finding requires confirmation in ongoing randomised controlled trials. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Optimising periprocedural management of direct oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic treatment undergoing major surgeries is an important aspect of balancing the risk of surgery-related bleeding with the risk of thromboembolic events, which may vary by surgery type. Methods This subanalysis of the prospective EMIT-AF/VTE programme assessed periprocedural-edoxaban management, according to physicians’ decisions, and bleeding and thromboembolic event rates in patients who underwent major vs. nonmajor surgeries. Edoxaban interruption and clinical outcomes were compared between major vs. nonmajor surgeries and between renal function subgroups (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≤ 50 mL/min vs. > 50 mL/min). Results We included 276 major and 512 nonmajor surgeries. The median pre- and postprocedural duration of edoxaban interruption in major vs. nonmajor surgeries was 4 vs. 1 days, whereas median duration of interruption for those with preprocedural-only and postprocedural-only interruption was 2 vs. 1 days and 2 vs. 0 days, respectively (P

Background: Optimising periprocedural management of direct oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic treatment undergoing major surgeries is an important aspect of balancing the risk of surgery-related bleeding with the risk of thromboembolic events, which may vary by surgery type. Methods: This subanalysis of the prospective EMIT-AF/VTE programme assessed periprocedural-edoxaban management, according to physicians' decisions, and bleeding and thromboembolic event rates in patients who underwent major vs. nonmajor surgeries. Edoxaban interruption and clinical outcomes were compared between major vs. nonmajor surgeries and between renal function subgroups (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≤ 50 mL/min vs. > 50 mL/min). Results: We included 276 major and 512 nonmajor surgeries. The median pre- and postprocedural duration of edoxaban interruption in major vs. nonmajor surgeries was 4 vs. 1 days, whereas median duration of interruption for those with preprocedural-only and postprocedural-only interruption was 2 vs. 1 days and 2 vs. 0 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Rates of all bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were numerically higher in major vs. nonmajor surgeries. Event rates (number of events per 100 surgeries) were low overall (< 6 events per 100 surgeries), independent of renal function subgroups. Conclusion: In this subanalysis of the EMIT-AF/VTE programme, periprocedural-edoxaban interruption was significantly longer in patients undergoing major vs. nonmajor surgery. This clinician-driven approach was associated with low rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events following both major and nonmajor surgeries. Trial registration: NCT02950168, registered October 31, 2016; NCT02951039, registered November 1, 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function can develop LV thrombus, a potentially life‐threatening condition due to risk of stroke and embolization. Conventional treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; e.g., warfarin) puts patients at risk of bleeding, and the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) appears promising, although data are scant. We searched the published English language literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with VKAs in LV thrombus. End points were failure to resolve, thromboembolic events (stroke, embolism), bleeding, or any adverse event (composite of thromboembolism or bleeding), or all‐cause death. Data were pooled and analyzed in hierarchical Bayesian models. In three eligible RCTs, 141 patients were studied during an average of 4.6 months (53.8 patient‐years; n = 71 assigned to DOAC, n = 70 assigned to VKA). A similar number of patients in each treatment arm demonstrated failure to resolve (DOAC: 14/71 vs. VKA: 15/70) and death events (3/71 vs. 4/70). However, patients on DOACs suffered fewer strokes/thromboembolic events (1/71 vs. 7/70; log odds ratio [OR], −2.02 [95% credible interval (CI95), −4.53 to −0.31]) and fewer bleeding events (2/71 vs. 9/70; log OR, −1.62 [CI95, −3.43 to −0.26]), leading to fewer patients on DOACs with any adverse event versus VKAs (3/71 vs. 16/70; log OR, −1.93 [CI95, −3.33 to −0.75]). In conclusion, pooled analysis of RCT data favors DOACs over VKAs in patients with LV thrombus in terms of both efficacy and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We conducted a multicenter real-world study in China to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Method: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted in 15 centers in China. We collected demographic information through the hospital information system and obtained clinical events through follow-up visits to patients or relatives. Clinical outcomes include major, minor, total bleeding, thromboembolism, and all-cause death. Result: A total of 6164 patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) were included in this study. The incidence of major bleeding in patients with NVAF differed significantly by BMI category (P < 0.001), with 5.2% in the underweight group, 2.6% in the normal group, 1.4% in the overweight group, 1.1% in the obese I group, and 1.3% in the obese II group. There was no significant difference in minor, total bleeding, and thrombosis in the five groups (P = 0.493; P = 0.172; P = 0.663). All-cause death was significantly different among the five groups (P < 0.001), with 8.9% in the underweight group, 6.3% in the normal group, 4.8% in the overweight group, 2.2% in the obese I group, and 0.4% in the obese II group. High BMI was negatively associated with major bleeding (OR = 0.353, 95% CI 0.205–0.608), total bleeding (OR = 0.664, 95% CI 0.445–0.991), and all-cause death (OR = 0.370, 95% CI 0.260–0.527). Conclusion: In patients with NVAF treated with DOACs, higher BMI was associated with lower major bleeding and better survival. BMI was a negative correlate of total bleeding, but not minor bleeding and thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) commonly have co-morbidities requiring anticoagulation. However, the optimal post-procedural anticoagulation regimen is not well-established. This meta-analysis investigates safety and efficacy outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA), with or without concomitant antiplatelet therapy. We searched EMBASE and MEDLINE for appropriate studies. Subgroup analyses were performed for anticoagulant monotherapy and combined therapy with antiplatelet agents. Eleven studies (6359 patients) were included. Overall, there were no differences between DOACs and VKA for all-cause mortality (Odds Ratio [OR]:.69; Credible Interval [CrI]:.40–1.06), cardiovascular-related mortality (OR:.76; Crl:.13–3.47), bleeding (OR:.95; CrI:.75–1.17), stroke (OR: 1.04; CrI:.65–1.63), myocardial infarction (OR: 1.51; CrI:.55–3.84), and valve thrombosis (OR:.29; CrI:.01–3.54). For DOACs vs VKA monotherapy subgroup, there were no differences in outcomes. For the combined therapy subgroup, there was decreased odds of all-cause mortality in the DOACs group compared with the VKA group (OR:.13; CrI:.02–.65), but no differences for bleeding and stroke. DOACs and VKA have similar safety and efficacy profiles for post-TAVI patients with anticoagulation indication. However, if concomitant antiplatelet therapy is required, DOACs were more favorable than VKA for all-cause mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Guidelines recommend the use of direct oral anticoagulation therapy over warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation. However, there is uncertainty and a lack of data supporting the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy in lung transplant recipients. Additionally, there are unique considerations for this population, such as labile renal function and drug interactions. Project Aims: The objective of this program evaluation was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban therapy for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients. Design: Medical records of all adult lung transplant recipients who received apixaban for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism treatment between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of bleeding. Efficacy was evaluated by the recurrence of blood clots or the incidence of stroke. Results: A total of 134 recipients were included in the review. Thromboembolisms occurred in 14 recipients (10%), and none experienced a stroke. Bleeding occurred in 12 recipients (9%). Conclusions: The results of this evaluation were similar to those seen in smaller studies of the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients, especially in recipients taking interacting azole antifungals. Prospective, comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our aim was to identify factors associated with major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and to construct and externally validate a predictive model that would provide a validated tool for clinical assessment of major bleeding. In the development cohort, prediction model was built by logistic regression, the area under the curve (AUC), and Nomogram. External validation, analytical identification and calibration of the model using AUC, calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The development cohort consisted of 4209 patients from 7 centers and the external validation cohort consisted of 1800 patients from 12 centers. Multifactorial analysis showed that age > 65 years, history of bleeding, anemia, vascular disease, antiplatelet therapy/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and rivaroxaban were independent risk factors for major bleeding, and gastrointestinal protective agents was a protective factor. The Alfalfa-MB model was constructed using these seven factors (AUC = 0.807), and in the external validation cohort, the model showed good discriminatory power (AUC = 0.743) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test P value of 0.205). The predictive power of the six bleeding scores was ORBIT (AUC = 0.706), HAS-BLED (AUC = 0.648), ATRIA (AUC = 0.645), HEMORR2 HAGES (AUC = 0.632), ABC (AUC = 0.619) and Shireman (AUC = 0.599) in descending order. Based on 7 factors, we derived and externally validated a predictive model for major bleeding with DOACs in patients with AF (Alfalfa-MB). The model has good predictive value and may be an effective tool to help reduce the occurrence of major bleeding in patients with DOACs. • New major bleeding score in a Chinese population with atrial fibrillation. • Model of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation on direct oral anticoagulants. • Develop the model in multiple centers and validate the model externally. • Several typical atrial fibrillation bleeding models were validated and compared. • This model can provide a new reference for predicting bleeding in clinical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with a mechanical heart valve need a lifelong anticoagulation due to the increased risk of valve thrombosis and thrombo-embolism. Currently, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the only approved class of oral anticoagulants, but relevant interactions and side effects lead to a large number of patients not achieving the optimal therapeutic target international normalized ration (INR). Therefore, steady measurements of the INR are imperative to ensure potent anticoagulation within a distinctive range. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with newer agents could serve as a possible alternative to VKAs in this patient cohort. DOACs are approved for several indications, e.g., atrial fibrillation (AF). They only have a minor interaction potential, which is why monitoring is not needed. Thereby, DOACs improve the livability of patients in need of chronical anticoagulation compared with VKAs. In contrast to dual platelet inhibition using aspirin in combination with an ADP receptor antagonist and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, the oral factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban show promising results according to current evidence. In small-scale studies, factor Xa inhibitors were able to prevent thrombosis and thrombo-embolic events in patients with mechanical heart valves. Finally, DOACs seem to represent a feasible treatment option in patients with mechanical heart valves, but further studies are needed to evaluate clinical safety. In addition to the ongoing PROACT Xa trial with apixaban in patients after aortic On-X valve implantation, studies in an all-comer collective with rivaroxaban could be promising. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a life-threatening neurological condition. There is limited evidence for the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for long-term anticoagulation in this patient population. We report a case series of patients treated with apixaban and their clinical course. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with CVT in a defined time period at our institution were screened for long-term anticoagulation and patients who were treated with apixaban were included in this study. Results: A total of nine patients were included in this study. The mean age was 36 years and 56% of the patients included were women. All received initial anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion for at least twenty-four hours, except for one patient who had anti-thrombin III deficiency and was treated with argatroban infusion. For long-term anticoagulation, 56% of patients received apixaban 10 mg twice daily for the first five to seven days followed by 5 mg twice daily, while the remaining 44% were transitioned from IV anticoagulation to apixaban 5 mg twice daily. There were no adverse events reported, except for one patient who developed anemia after 7 months of treatment and required a blood transfusion. Complete recanalization was achieved in 78% while 22% had partial recanalization. Follow-up time ranged from six to twenty-three months. Conclusion: The use of apixaban for long-term anticoagulation in CVT resulted in recanalization in all of the patients in this case series without any major side effects. This case series adds to the emerging studies demonstrating the utility of apixaban for CVT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Renal infarction is an underdiagnosed condition with multiple possible causes, including atrial fibrillation. The treatment approach includes percutaneous endovascular therapy (PET) to restore blood flow, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, or combination therapy, depending on the patient's status and available modalities. Warfarin is the standard anticoagulation therapy, although direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy is getting more popular. Here, we present a 60‐year‐old male patient with hyperthyroidism complicated by acute renal infarction, which was successfully treated with dabigatran, evident by non‐recurrence and restoration of blood flow in a follow‐up CT angiogram. This case report may open the door for the use of DOAC in acute renal infarction though more studies are needed to prove the efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: This review addresses common clinical scenarios which may require anticoagulation in liver disease patients, the safety and efficacy of direct acting oral anticoagulation (DOAC) agents in liver disease, DOAC dosing considerations based on hepatic or renal impairment, and when anticoagulation should possibly be held or reversed. Recent Findings: The use of DOACs is considered safe and effective compared to traditional therapies like vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and heparin in patients with liver disease although there is likely an increased risk of bleeding in patients with Child–Pugh B and C. Summary: In the setting of liver disease, anticoagulation with DOAC therapy is considered safe and effective. However, there is likely an increased risk of bleeding in Child-Pugh B and C but further studies are needed to quantify this risk. There is no guidance at this time on DOAC-level monitoring, but future studies evaluating its use may be helpful in liver disease patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Renal infarction is an underdiagnosed condition with multiple possible causes, including atrial fibrillation. The treatment approach includes percutaneous endovascular therapy (PET) to restore blood flow, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, or combination therapy, depending on the patient's status and available modalities. Warfarin is the standard anticoagulation therapy, although direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy is getting more popular. Here, we present a 60‐year‐old male patient with hyperthyroidism complicated by acute renal infarction, which was successfully treated with dabigatran, evident by non‐recurrence and restoration of blood flow in a follow‐up CT angiogram. This case report may open the door for the use of DOAC in acute renal infarction though more studies are needed to prove the efficacy.

This propensity-score matched study investigated clinical outcomes associated with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) versus direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) in patients with AF and prior ischemic stroke. AF patients enrolled in the Amulet Observational Study with a history of ischemic stroke and successful LAAO (n = 299) were compared with a propensity-score matched cohort of incident AF patients with prior ischemic stroke and treated by DOAC (n = 301). The control cohort was identified through the Danish National Patient Registries. Propensity score matching was based on covariates of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores, with a 1:2 ratio and using Greedy 5:1 digit matching with replacement. The analysis included 2-years follow-up, with a primary composite outcome of ischemic stroke, major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3) or all-cause mortality. Mean (SD) CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores were 5.26 (1.42) and 5.40 (1.31) and HAS-BLED scores were 3.95 (0.91) and 4.03 (0.96), for the LAAO and DOAC group, respectively. Total number of primary composite outcome events were 61 (12.4 events/100 patient-years) and 117 (26.9 events/100 patient-years) in the LAAO and DOAC group, respectively. Risk of the primary composite outcome was significantly lower in the LAAO group, hazard rate ratio [HR] 0.48 (95% CI: 0.35–0.65). Ischemic stroke risk was comparable, HR 0.71 (95% CI: 0.34–1.45), while risk of major bleeding, HR 0.41 (95% CI: 0.25–0.67), and all-cause mortality, HR 0.48 (95% CI: 0.32–0.71), were significantly lower with LAAO. Cardiovascular mortality did not differ statistically between the LAAO and DOAC group, HR 0.75 (95% CI: 0.39–1.42). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. This study indicated significantly lower risk of the composite outcome of stroke, major bleeding and all-cause mortality with LAAO therapy compared to DOAC, in patients with AF and prior stroke. The stroke prevention effectiveness appeared similar, with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding events with LAAO. The suggested clinical benefit of LAAO over DOAC require confirmation in the ongoing randomized OCCLUSION-AF trial. • Patients with atrial fibrillation and prior ischemic are at particularly high risk of stroke recurrence and bleeding. • LAAO has shown promise in randomized studies, yet, data is sparse and absent in AF patients with prior stroke. • RRRisk of the composite outcome of stroke, major bleeding, and mortality was significantly lower with LAAO compared to DOAC. • The stroke prevention effectiveness appeared similar, with significantly lower risk of major bleeding with LAAO. • These results demand confirmation in the ongoing randomized OCCLUSION-AF trial (NCT03642509) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) involves minimizing expansion of the thrombus and promoting the recanalization of the venous sinus. While current guidelines include indications of endovascular management and anticoagulation with heparin and warfarin, the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased. In this study, we aim to conduct a network meta-analysis comparing these 3 therapeutic options: standard anticoagulation, DOACs, and endovascular treatments (EVTs). Seventeen of 2265 studies identified from 4 publication databases met inclusion criteria for this network meta-analysis. Outcomes analyzed included modified Rankin Scale score, complications, mortality, and 6-month recanalization rates using a frequentist network meta-analysis approach. For each outcome, the preferential order of each intervention was ranked hierarchically based on P-score calculations used for frequentist network meta-analyses. Modified Rankin Scale outcomes were not significantly different based on the type of treatment modality (i.e., standard anticoagulation, DOACs, or EVT). Evaluation of complications demonstrated that patients treated with EVT were significantly more likely to experience a worse outcome than individuals treated with standard anticoagulation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, P = 0.04). Other comparisons did not demonstrate a significant difference in adverse events. For all-cause mortality outcomes, EVT demonstrated significantly greater odds of mortality than standard anticoagulation (OR = 1.89, P = 0.02). Mortality between DOACs and standard anticoagulation was not significantly different. When comparing 6-month recanalization rates, DOACs and EVT were significantly more effective than standard anticoagulation (OR = 1.93, OR = 2.2, P < 0.05). EVT followed by DOACs was preferred over standard anticoagulation for 6-month recanalization rates. This network meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes in CVT treatment, comparing standard anticoagulation, DOACs, and EVT, with evidence that DOACs have similar outcomes to standard anticoagulation in the treatment of CVT. EVT resulted in an increased risk of overall mortality but improved 6-month recanalization rates. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Though many trauma patients are on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (AAT), there are few generalizable data on the risks for these patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy on mortality and length of stay (LOS) in general trauma patients.Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients in the institutional trauma registry during 2019 to determine AAT use on admission and discharge. Outcomes were compared using standard statistics.Results: Of 2261 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 2 were excluded due to an incomplete medication reconciliation, resulting in 2259 patients. Patients on AAT had a higher mortality (4.5% vs 2.1%). On multivariable analysis, preadmission AC (odds ratio OR, 3.325, P = .001), age (OR 1.040, P < .001), and injury severity score ((ISS) 1.094, P < .001) were associated with mortality. Anticoagulation use was also associated with longer LOS on multivariable analysis (OR: 1.626, P = .005). Antiplatelet use was not associated with higher mortality or longer LOS. More patients on AAT were unable to be discharged home. However, patients on AAT did not have a greater blood transfusion requirement or need more hemorrhage control procedures. Lastly, 23.7% of patients on preadmission AAT were not discharged on any AAT.Discussion: These data demonstrate that patients on AC, but not AP, have greater mortality and longer hospital LOS. This may provide guidance for those being newly started on AAT. Further work to determine which patients benefit most from restarting AAT would lead to improvement in the care of trauma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic affecting all countries in the world. Italy has been particularly afflicted by the health emergency, and since the peak phase has passed, major concern regarding medium to long term complications due to COVID-19 is arising. Little is known in literature regarding thromboembolic complications once healed after COVID-19. Case presentation A 51-year-old patient recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia complicated by pulmonary embolism (PE) came to the hospital for palpitations and chest pain. Although he was on treatment dose of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC), massive recurrent PE was diagnosed. Conclusion In the early post COVID-19 era, the question remains regarding the efficacy of DOACs in COVID-19 patients.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Until recently, guidelines recommended the use of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as standard of care for VTE in patients with cancer. Despite the proven efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for treatment of VTE, there is equipoise supporting their use in cancer patients.Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Medline and EMBASE identified four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with cancer and VTE comparing a factor Xa inhibitor (FXaI) to LMWH. A meta-analysis was performed with a primary outcome of VTE recurrence and key secondary outcomes of major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.Results: Four RCTs with 2,907 patients were included. 1,451 patients were randomised to FXaI and 1,456 to LMWH. VTE recurrence was lower in the FXaI group (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.44-0.87; p=0.01; I2=24.90), with an absolute risk difference of -4% equating to a number needed to treat of 25 for prevention of recurrent VTE with FXaI. No significant difference in major bleeding was noted between groups (RR 1.33, 95%CI 0.84-2.11; p=0.23). Rates of GI bleeding (RR 1.87, 95%CI 1.06-3.29; p=0.03) and CRNMB (RR 1.57, 95%CI 1.11-2.23; p=0.01) were greater with FXaIs.Conclusion: In patients with cancer and VTE, the rate of VTE recurrence was significantly lower with FXaI than with LMWH without an increased risk of major bleeding. Our data supports the use of FXaIs as the standard of care for the treatment of VTE in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices are an alternative therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation (OAC). However, there are limited data about the clinical outcomes of LAAC devices compared to medical treatment.Methods: A comprehensive research for studies comparing LAAC devices and OAC for patients with NVAF was performed from inception to January 1, 2021. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effect model to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results: Five studies were eligible that included a total of 4778 patients with a median-weighted follow-up period was 2.6 years. Compared to OAC, the LAAC device arm was associated with a lower risk of the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.51-1.00; p = 0.05). LAAC device arm was also associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (OR of 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.77; p < 0.0001), cardiovascular mortality (OR of 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.70; p < 0.00001), hemorrhagic stroke (OR of 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.50; p= 0.0006), all major bleeding (OR of 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.88; p = 0.007) and non-procedural major bleeding (OR of 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.65; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in all stroke, ischemic stroke, and systemic embolization between the two groups.Conclusions: Our meta-analysis showed lower all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, non-procedural major bleeding and the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death in the LAAC device arm when compared to OAC. However, the risk of all stroke, ischemic stroke, and systemic embolism were similar between the two arms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a cancer type with high thrombogenic potential and GBM patients are therefore at a particularly high risk for thrombotic events. To date, only limited data on anticoagulation management after pulmonary embolism (PE) in GBM is available and the sporadic use of DOACs remains off-label. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with GBM and postoperative, thoracic CT scan confirmed PE was performed. Clinical course, follow-up at 6 and 12 months and the overall survival (OS) were evaluated using medical charts and neuroradiological data. Out of 584 GBM patients, 8% suffered from postoperative PE. Out of these, 30% received direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and 70% low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for therapeutic anticoagulation. There was no significant difference in major intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), re-thrombosis, or re-embolism between the two cohorts. Although statistically non-significant, a tendency to reduced mRS at 6 and 12 months was observed in the LMWH cohort. Furthermore, patients receiving DOACs had a statistical benefit in OS. In our analysis, DOACs showed a satisfactory safety profile in terms of major ICH, re-thrombosis, and re-embolism compared to LMWH in GBM patients with postoperative PE. Prospective, randomized trials are urgent to evaluate DOACs for therapeutic anticoagulation in GBM patients with PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The negative impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on stroke care has been reported, but no data exist on the influence of the lockdown on medication adherence to antithrombotic treatment for stroke prevention. We present a comparison of electronic adherence data of stroke patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) prior to and during the COVID-19 lockdown in spring 2020 in Switzerland. Methods: This is a secondary analysis using data from the ongoing MAAESTRO study, in which stroke patients with atrial fibrillation electronically monitor their adherence to DOAC treatment. Eligible patients for this analysis had at least four weeks of adherence data prior to and during the COVID-19 lockdown. Three adherence metrics (taking adherence, timing adherence, drug holidays) were calculated and compared descriptively. Results: The analysis included eight patients (median age 81.5 years, IQR 74.8–84.5). Five patients had a pre-lockdown taking adherence over 90% (mean 96.8% ± 2.9), with no change during lockdown, high timing adherence in both periods and no drug holidays. The remaining three patients had pre-lockdown taking and timing adherence below 90%. Of those, two patients showed a moderate decline either in taking or timing adherence compared to pre-lockdown. One showed a substantial increase in taking and timing adherence during lockdown (both + 25.8%). Conclusion: Our data suggest that a major disruption of social life (i.e., the imposed COVID-19 lockdown) is unlikely to relevantly affect the medication intake behaviour of patients with high pre-established adherence, but might have an impact in patients with previously suboptimal adherence. Trial registration number: MAAESTRO: electronic Monitoring and improvement of Adherence to direct oral Anticoagulant treatment—a randomized crossover study of an Educational and reminder-based intervention in ischaemic STROke patients under polypharmacy, NCT03344146. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with a higher risk of liver-related complications. Recent guidelines recommend direct-acting anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis and non-tumoral PVT. However, data on the efficacy and safety of DOAC in these patients remain limited. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOAC compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to treat non-tumoral PVT in patients with cirrhosis. We performed a systematic search of six electronic databases using MeSH term and free text. We selected all studies comparing the use of DOACs with vitamin K antagonist to treat PVT in cirrhosis. The primary outcome was PVT recanalization. Secondary outcomes were and PVT progression, major bleeding, variceal bleeding and death. From 944 citations, we included 552 subjects from a total of 11 studies (10 observational and 1 randomized trial) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found that DOAC were associated with a higher pooled rate of PVT recanalization (RR = 1.67, 95%CI: 1.02, 2.74, I2 = 79%) and lower pooled risk of PVT progression (RR = 0.14, 95%CI: 0.03–0.57, I2 = 0%). The pooled risk of major bleeding (RR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.08–1.01, I2 = 0%), variceal bleeding (RR = 1.29, 95%CI: 0.64–2.59, I2 = 0%) and death (RR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.01–9.578, I2 = 80%) was similar between DOAC and VKA. For the treatment of PVT in patients with cirrhosis, the bleeding risk was comparable between DOAC and VKA. However, DOAC were associated with a higher pooled rate of PVT recanalization. Dedicated randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prevention of stroke by anticoagulation is essential in patients with Atrial fibrillation (AF); with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) being preferred over warfarin in most patients. The Long-term efficacy and safety of DOACs vs. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) remain unknown. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) were searched from inception to February 10th, 2021. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes included incidence of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and systemicembolism. The safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding (a composite of major or minor clinically relevant bleeding). Results: A total of three studies with 3039 participants (LAAO = 1465; DOACs = 1574) were included. Mean age was 74.2 and 75.3 years in the LAAO and DOAC group respectively. Average follow-up period was 2 years. There was no difference in terms of cardiac mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.40–2.03; p = 0.81), ischemic stroke/TIA (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.80–1.65; p = 0.46; I2 = 0) and clinically significant bleeding (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50–1.17; p = 0.22; I2 = 69) between the groups. Conclusions: Among patients with AF, LAAO was comparable to DOACs with similar efficacy and safety profiles.

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic affecting all countries in the world. Italy has been particularly afflicted by the health emergency, and since the peak phase has passed, major concern regarding medium to long term complications due to COVID-19 is arising. Little is known in literature regarding thromboembolic complications once healed after COVID-19.Case Presentation: A 51-year-old patient recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia complicated by pulmonary embolism (PE) came to the hospital for palpitations and chest pain. Although he was on treatment dose of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC), massive recurrent PE was diagnosed.Conclusion: In the early post COVID-19 era, the question remains regarding the efficacy of DOACs in COVID-19 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, are increasingly being used to provide prophylaxis and treatment for arterial and venous thromboembolism. Multiple procedural subspecialties have implemented guidelines detailing time frames for perioperative DOAC interruption; however, the impact of perioperative DOAC interruption in patients undergoing dermatologic surgery is currently unknown, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking.Objective: To assess the 30-day postoperative rate of thrombotic complications (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or a history of DVT who underwent perioperative DOAC interruption during dermatologic surgery.Methods: A retrospective medical record review was performed of all patients with AF or a history of DVT who underwent perioperative DOAC interruption during dermatologic surgery at Advanced Dermatologic Surgery and the University of Kansas Medical Center between January 1, 2016, and August 31, 2020.Results: Among 806 operations, comprising 750 Mohs micrographic operations (93.1%) and 56 excisions (6.9%), 1 patient (0.14% of patients with AF) sustained a transient ischemic attack and 2 patients (0.25% of all patients) sustained minor bleeding complications during the 30-day postoperative period.Conclusion: Perioperative DOAC interruption appears to be safe and efficacious in dermatologic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Use of chronic vitamin K antagonist (VKA) induces a long-term deficiency of vitamin K, which may cause arterial stiffness and bone-related disease. Switching from VKA to rivaroxaban could induce rapid sufficiency of vitamin K and improvement of arterial stiffness. The K2 SUMMIT-3 study is a multicenter, open-label, prospective, and randomized design. Patients with atrial fibrillation who have been taking VKA for more than 6 months but less than 10 years were randomly assigned to two groups; those switching from VKA to rivaroxaban and those continuing with VKA medication. The primary endpoint was the percentage difference of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) in 3 months. A total of 77 patients were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (n = 38) or VKA (n = 39). The average age was 74 ± 9 years. The duration for which VKA was prescribed prior to randomization was 90 ± 87 months. Abnormally high levels of Des-gamma carboxyprothrombin (PIVKA-II) or uncarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) indicating vitamin K insufficiency were observed in 100% or 82% of the patients at baseline but it reduced to 2% (p < 0.0001) or 55% (p = 0.01) at 3 months in the rivaroxaban group. To the contrary, theses data had no changes in the VKA group. The percentage difference in baPWV was − 1.4 ± 10.0% vs. 3.5 ± 14.7% in the rivaroxaban and the VKA groups, respectively. (p = 0.02). Switching from VKA to rivaroxaban resulted in rapid sufficiency of vitamin K and reduction of arterial stiffness in 3 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This is a retrospective analysis of patients with pulmonary embolism after meningioma resection. • Direct oral anticoagulants were not associated with elevated risk for hemorrhage or poor outcome. • No recurrent venous thromboembolism was observed in all groups. • DOACs appear therefore a reasonable pharmakon of choice after craniotomy and pulmonary embolism. Acute postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE) is a dreaded complication with severe mortality rates. Brain tumor patients are at the highest risk for postoperative PE. The juxtaposition of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) in the treatment of postoperative PE in meningioma patients is largely unexplored. This is a single center observational analysis of meningioma patients who underwent neurosurgical resection with a thoracic CT scan confirmation of postoperative PE. The treatment modality, clinical course and outcome were investigated. Of 538 meningioma patients operated, 30 (6%) developed acute postoperative PE. After diagnosis, these patients received different long-term anticoagulation regimes. No significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage (p < 0.56), re-operation rate (p < 0.70) or Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) at 3 (p < 0.34) and 12 months (p = 1) were identified, when compared according to the different anticoagulation regimes. DOACs were not associated with elevated risk for hemorrhage, recurrent thrombosis or poor outcome when compared with traditional anticoagulation regimes. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to verify the non-inferiority of DOACs for long-term anticoagulation in postoperative pulmonary embolism after meningioma resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended by several scientific societies as first-line therapy for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is uncertainty regarding the organisation of anticoagulation care, with various caregivers being involved. Patients and caregivers are often confronted by uncertainty about the coordination of treatment. With the functional resonance analysis method we visualised the process of anticoagulation care in daily practice in the Maastricht region. This resulted in recommendations on how to improve the organisation of anticoagulation care for DOAC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Approximately 1 out of 4 stroke patients suffers ischemic stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation (AF). Although indicated, withholding of anticoagulants for secondary prevention is a widespread phenomenon. Objective: We examined the longitudinal change of recommendation and prescription of secondary preventive anticoagulation in AF patients in an acute stroke center setting focusing on the impact of the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the change of national stroke prevention guidelines. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted with an acute cerebrovascular ischemic event underwent regular diagnostic work-up. Pseudonymized clinical data were entered into the institution's stroke registry. In those patients with AF, discharge letters were collected and evaluated for temporal trends and affecting factors of recommended and prescribed antithrombotic secondary medication at the time of discharge from hospital. Results: Of 7,175 patients admitted between January 2009 and December 2018, 1,812 (25.3%) suffered stroke caused by AF. Frequency of patients with recommended anticoagulation increased within the observation period from 66.7 to 95.8% (per year; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.309; confidence interval [CI], 1.153–1.486). Independently from this time trend, DOAC approval (adjusted OR, 4.026; CI 1.962–8.265) and guideline change (adjusted OR, 2.184; CI, 1.006–4.743) were associated with an increasing frequency of recommendation for anticoagulation. The rate of patients already receiving recommended anticoagulation for secondary prevention at discharge increased from 42.1 to 62.5%. Introduction of DOACs was not associated with this trend, and guideline change was even associated with decreasing frequency of anticoagulated patients at hospital discharge (adjusted OR, 0.641; CI, 0.414–0.991). Fear of early intracerebral bleeding was the most common reason for withholding anticoagulation (37%) at hospital discharge and stayed stable during the observation period. Conclusions: Changing national guidelines with discard of contraindications for anticoagulation and the introduction of DOACs led to a broader recommendation of oral anticoagulation. However, both, new guidelines and DOACs, were not found to be associated with an increasing percentage of patients discharged from our hospital already on recommended anticoagulant prevention. This might be explained by the decreasing length of hospital stay during the study period and a missing evidence of early bleeding risk of DOACs in patients with acute brain infarction. Evidence-based data to close this therapeutic gap are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Real-life clinical application of anticoagulant drugs is currently one of the most promising trends in cardiology. With relation to initial prescription of anticoagulants, the updated 2016 guidelines on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) highlight direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) rather than vitamin K antagonists, but, unfortunately, they are not clear about whether different DOAC have the same clinical effect of there is a significant difference.Material and methods. We conducted a comparative analysis of the safety of DOAC in patients with non-valvular AF and attempted to identify the potential predictors of hemorrhagic events in order to assess the predictive value of bleeding risk scores. For this purpose, we observed 117 patients with non-valvular AF who received DOAC to prevent TEC for 2 years (24 months).Results. Over the entire period of follow-up, no major bleeding or thromboembolic complications were recorded, supporting the good efficacy and safety profile of DOAC. We analysed the prognostic value of various scores and found that HAS-BLED had the highest predictive value in the group of patients treated with the direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). Treatment with factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) did not demonstrate a similar trend.Conclusion. Over the 2-year follow-up of 117 patients treated with DOAC, we were able to show that this group of drugs in patients with non-valvular AF is effective and safe given that adequate doses in accordance with the instructions are administered; this is true for both direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban). HAS-BLED was prognostically more accurate when the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran was administered.

Background: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is an uncommon neurological condition usually treated with heparin followed by oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), compared to VKAs, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer several advantages. However, there is little data concerning their use in managing CVT. Aims: This retrospective observational study pursued 2 objectives: (1) to investigate clinical characteristics of CVT patients treated with heparin + DOACs vs. heparin + standard treatment; (2) to compare clinical outcomes. Methods: Consecutive CVT patients recruited from January 2016 to March 2018 in 2 French university hospitals (Lyon, Saint-Etienne), and treated with DOACs or VKAs were identified. Radiological evolution, VTE, hemorrhagic events, and antithrombotic medication were recorded. Functional outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin scale score and venous recanalization was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Overall, 41 patients were included: 25 (61%) received VKAs and 16 (39%) DOACs. We identified no clinical or radiological features explaining the physicians' preference for a specific anticoagulation treatment, and age, initial clinical presentation, radiological severity, and individual risk factors thus unlikely guided the choice of anticoagulant. No DOAC patient exhibited clinical or radiological thrombosis aggravation, and the thrombosis completely vanished in 6 (40%). Two of the VKA-treated patients (28.6%) demonstrated complete venous recanalization, whereas 3 others experienced clinical or radiological aggravation versus baseline. There was no major bleeding leading to hospitalization in both groups. Conclusion: The collected data on DOAC efficacy and safety in CVT management appear encouraging, yet needs to be confirmed by larger prospective randomized clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Some experimental studies have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have anti-inflammatory effects. However, the interval changes in inflammatory markers in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who receive DOACs remain unknown. Between July 2013 and April 2014, a total of 187 AF patients randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (n = 91) or dabigatran (n = 96) were assessed for eligibility. The levels of the following inflammatory markers were serially evaluated: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, pentraxin-3, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, growth and differentiation factor-15, and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM). The aim in this study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients with AF, in addition to the impact of markers on bleeding events. Finally, 117 patients (rivaroxaban: n = 55, dabigatran: n = 62) were included in the analysis at 12 months. Although the interval changes in sTM levels tended to be greater in the dabigatran group [0.3 (0–0.7) vs. 0.5 (0–1.0) FU/ml, p = 0.061], there were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between 2 groups. There were no significant differences in bleeding events between 2 groups. The interval changes in sTM levels were significantly greater in patients with bleeding compared with those without [0.8 (0.5–1.3) vs. 0.4 (− 0.1–0.8) FU/ml, p = 0.017]. There were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between rivaroxaban and dabigatran treatments in patients with AF. The increased levels of sTM after DOACs treatment might be related to bleeding events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulation agents (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed to older adults. Concerns for perioperative blood loss dictate cessation of anticoagulation treatment and postponement of surgery until the coagulation system returns to normal state. The goal of this study is to compare the estimates of perioperative blood loss and mortality between patients using DOACs and patients receiving no anticoagultaion, in order to challenge the existing policy and question the need for surgery deferral.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of patients (age > 65) with proximal hip fractures treated with either closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF, n = 1143; DOAC use n = 60) or hemiarthroplasty (HA, n = 571; DOAC use n = 29). Baseline patient characteristics included age, gender, ASA score, socioeconomic level, type of surgica#1: In general a l treatment, duration of surgery and time from admission to surgery. The effect of anticoagulant prescription on percentage of hemoglobin change, odds of receiving blood transfusions and one-month and one-year mortality was evaluated separately for CRIF and HA patients.Results: Patients receiving DOACs had similar perioperative hemoglobin change, transfusion rates and mortality, compared to subjects without anticoagulants in both CRIF and HA cohorts. DOAC patients undergoing CRIF had a longer delay to surgery (40.2 ± 26.9 vs 31.2 ± 22.2, p = 0.003) and higher mortality rates at one year postoperatively (26.7% vs 16.1%, p = 0.015).Conclusions: DOAC use was not associated with an increased perioperative blood loss or mortality compared to controls. However, they had to wait longer for surgery, which itself was an independent predictor of mortality. It may be safe to shorten waiting time for surgery in patients using anticoagulation, with the goal to minimize surgery delay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The incidence of patients who present with life-threatening bleeding complications has been increasing as the use of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) has increased. Therefore, effective reversal agents are urgently needed. Current guidelines recommend the use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and activated PCCs (aPCC) for reversal of DOAC anticoagulant activity in the setting of traumatic and non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). However, little data is available.Objective: Herein, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity [FEIBA (an aPCC)] in a population of patients who required emergent reversal of DOAC for hemorrhage or urgent surgical interventions.Methods: This is a case series study. Medical records from patients who required emergent reversal of DOAC for life threatening hemorrhage or urgent surgical interventions were collected from February 1, 2014, to April 1, 2017 and reviewed. Data, including demographics as well as safety, outcomes, and dosing of FEIBA for reversal of DOAC effects were collected and descriptive statistics were obtained.Results: Forty-two patients who received FEIBA were included in the study. The rates of thrombotic events (10%), hemorrhage progression (10%), and observed mortality (29%) were similar to rates previously published in the limited literature evaluating aPCC use in this population.Conclusion: This case series suggests that FEIBA administration is relatively safe and effective to reverse DOACs in the setting of hemorrhage or need for urgent surgical procedures. Until target-specific reversal agents are available, future studies are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of aPCC administration for DOAC-associated hemorrhagic complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) were excluded from landmark trials evaluating direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective was to evaluate prescribing and bleeding with DOACs compared to warfarin in AF patients with chronic HD. A retrospective, observational study of patients receiving warfarin or DOAC from April 2010-April 2016 from area health system hospitals and Dialysis Clinics, Inc. records. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and chi-square. Ninety-one patients were included with warfarin as the initial OAC in most patients (n = 76) at average dose of 29 mg/week. Fifteen patients were initially prescribed apixaban (n = 12) or dabigatran (n = 3). Most switches in OAC therapy were to apixaban. When the initial OAC was a DOAC, it was not dosed appropriately in five with one bleed, two dosed appropriately had bleeds. When initial warfarin was switched to a DOAC, it was not dosed appropriately in seven with five bleeds. More bleeds occurred with warfarin alone (n = 18) vs. those on warfarin switched to DOAC (n = 5) vs. DOAC alone (n = 3), p = 0.022. All but four patients that bled had HAS-BLED scores three or higher. Warfarin was most often prescribed and associated with a higher incidence of bleeding compared to DOACs in this population of patients at high risk for bleeding. Larger studies should be conducted to analyze the impact of DOAC dose appropriateness on safety and clinical outcomes.

Background: There is little evidence to guide the perioperative management of patients on a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in the absence of a last known dose. Quantitative serum titers may be ordered, but there is little evidence supporting this., Aims: This multi-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive surgical in-patients with a DOAC assay, performed over a five-year period, aimed to characterize preoperative DOAC assay orders and their impact on perioperative outcomes., Materials and Methods: Patients prescribed regular DOAC (both prophylactic and therapeutic dosing) with a preoperative DOAC assay were included. The DOAC assay titer was evaluated against endpoints. Further, patients with an assay were compared against anticoagulated patients who did not receive a preoperative DOAC assay. The primary endpoint was major bleeding. Secondary endpoints included perioperative hemoglobin change, blood transfusions, idarucizumab or prothrombin complex concentrate administration, postoperative thrombosis, in-hospital mortality and reoperation. Adjusted and unadjusted linear regression models were used for continuous data. Binary logistic models were performed for dichotomous outcomes., Results: 1065 patients were included, 232 had preoperative assays. Assays were ordered most commonly by Spinal (11.9%), Orthopedics (15.4%), and Neurosurgery (19.4%). For every 10 ng/ml increase in titer, the hemoglobin decreases by 0.5066 g/L and the odds of a preoperative reversal increases by 13%. Compared to those without an assay, patients with preoperative DOAC assays had odds 1.44× higher for major bleeding, 2.98× higher for in-hospital mortality and 16.3× higher for receiving anticoagulant reversal., Conclusion: A preoperative DOAC assay order was associated with worse outcomes despite increased reversal administration. However, the DOAC assay titer can reflect the patient's likelihood of bleeding.

Direct oral anticoagulants have recently been recommended for non-valvular atrial ibrillation, but have rarely been studied in the ield of cardiac surgery. We prospectively investigated the safety of edoxaban, a novel oral anticoagulant, for use in cardiac surgery patients with postoperative atrial ibrillation (POAF), which is the most common complication of cardiac surgery and can lead to stroke. The subjects were adult cardiac surgery patients with POAF who received oral edoxaban for 2 months in an open-label pilot study. The primary endpoint was cerebrovascular/bleeding events up to 2 months, while the secondary endpoints were hemoglobin, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time. There were no cerebrovascular or bleeding events during edoxaban treatment and the test drug was not discontinued by any patient. There was no macroscopic hematuria and hemoglobin did not decrease, being signiicantly higher than the baseline level after 2 months. The prothrombin time was signiicantly prolonged from 1 week to 2 months and the activated partial thromboplastin time was signiicantly prolonged from 1 day to 2 months. Echocardiography detected pericardial effusion in 1 patient, but hemoglobin did not decrease and the effusion improved with diuretic therapy. In conclusion, despite the limited sample size of this pilot study, it was demonstrated that edoxaban does not induce bleeding in patients with POAF after cardiac surgery, suggesting that it is safe to perform a large-scale eficacy study of edoxaban as anticoagulant therapy for POAF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]