Search

PURPOSE With the initial analysis of POLLUX at a median follow-up of 13.5 months, daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We report updated efficacy and safety results at the time of final analysis for overall survival (OS). METHODS POLLUX was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study during which eligible patients with ≥ 1 line of prior therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After positive primary analysis and protocol amendment, patients receiving Rd were offered daratumumab monotherapy after disease progression. RESULTS Significant OS benefit was observed with D-Rd (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.91; P = .0044) at a median (range) follow-up of 79.7 months (0.0-86.5). The median OS was 67.6 months for D-Rd compared with 51.8 months for Rd. Prespecified analyses demonstrated an improved OS with D-Rd versus Rd in most subgroups, including patients age ≥ 65 years and patients with one, two, or three prior lines of therapy, International Staging System stage III disease, high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, and refractoriness to their last prior line of therapy or a proteasome inhibitor. The most common (≥ 10%) grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events with D-Rd versus Rd were neutropenia (57.6% v 41.6%), anemia (19.8% v 22.4%), pneumonia (17.3% v 11.0%), thrombocytopenia (15.5% v 15.7%), and diarrhea (10.2% v 3.9%). CONCLUSION D-Rd significantly extended OS versus Rd alone in patients with RRMM. To our knowledge, for the first time, our findings, together with the OS benefit observed with daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase III CASTOR trial, demonstrate OS improvement with daratumumab-containing regimens in RRMM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02076009 [POLLUX]).

To examine the impact of an integrative medicine (IM) course on self-perceived IM-related communication and research skills.A 3-day mandatory "hybrid" (online and in-person) IM course was held within COVID-19 restrictions for 161 pre-clerkship medical students, with workshops facilitated by mentor healthcare professionals (IM and non-IM) and student-directed tasks. Self-perceived levels of 6 IM-related skills were scored (from 1 to 5) for history-taking; communicating with patients with "alternative" health-beliefs; referral to IM consultations; assessing risks/benefits; and working with non-medical IM practitioners.137 students (85.1%) completed pre-/post-course questionnaires, with overall scores improving from pre-course (1.98 ± 0.92) to post-course (3.31 ± 0.63; p 0.0001), for the entire group and student subgroups (with vs. without prior IM experience). Multivariate analysis found no association between age, gender, primary language or prior experience with IM and improvement in skill scores.The IM course increased self-perceived skill levels, reflecting the course curriculum and workshops. Further research needs to explore the application of these skills during clinical training.Teaching medical students about IM in a course comprising communication and research skills was shown to be feasible and effective. The application of IM-related skills needs to be evaluated during the clinical clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone has shown improved progression-free and overall survival versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We aimed to assess these regimens in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: ELOQUENT-1 is an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 185 hospitals, oncology practices, and research centres in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed, untreated, symptomatic myeloma and not candidates for high-dose therapy plus HSCT, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or lower. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone using an interactive voice response system, stratified by the International Staging System (ISS; stage I-II vs III), age (

In the phase 3 POLLUX trial, daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone. Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from POLLUX, assessed using the validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the EuroQol 5-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. Changes from baseline are presented as least-squares mean changes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from a mixed-effects model. PRO assessment compliance rates were high and similar in both D-Rd and Rd groups through cycle 40 (week 156). In this on-treatment analysis, mean changes from baseline were significantly greater in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status, physical functioning, and pain scores in the D-Rd group versus the Rd group at multiple time points; however, magnitude of changes was low, suggesting no meaningful impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Subgroup results were similar to those in the overall population. In the POLLUX study, baseline HRQoL was maintained with prolonged D-Rd treatment. These findings complement the sustained and significant improvement in progression-free survival observed with D-Rd and supports its use in patients with RRMM. Clinical trial registration: NCT02076009.

The present study aimed to explore attitudes of medical students following a course in integrative medicine (IM) focused on palliative and supportive cancer.Attitudes to IM among pre-clerkship medical students were assessed following a 3-day required course, which included interviews with international experts in IM and "hands-on" workshops mentored by IM and non-IM healthcare professionals. Student reflections were analyzed qualitatively, and written narratives were examined thematically.Of 161 students, 102 (63.4%) provided post-course reflections. The main narrative themes included pre-course attitudes, attitude changes and influencing factors, and insights on implementing IM in clinical practice. Pre-course attitudes were predominantly skeptical, with post-course attitudes more open and non-judgmental, addressing research on IM effectiveness and safety. Students looked favorably on the implementation of IM in clinical practice and felt the course enhanced communication with patients.Student attitudes to IM shifted following the course, from a skeptical to a more non-judgmental and accepting approach. IM course may facilitate a better understanding of the limitations and risks of IM practices, particularly in the supportive cancer care setting, as well as implications regarding students' own resilience and professional growth.

In the randomized phase-3 OPTIMISMM study, the addition of pomalidomide to bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone (PVd) resulted in significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in lenalidomide-pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), including lenalidomide refractory patients. Here, we report health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results from this trial. Patients received PVd or Vd in 21-day cycles until disease progression or discontinuation. HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-MY20, and EQ-5D-3L instruments on day 1 of each treatment cycle. Mean score changes for global QoL, physical functioning, fatigue, side effects of treatment domains, and EQ-5D-3L index were generally stable over time across treatment arms. The proportion of patients who experienced clinically meaningful worsening in global QoL and other domains of interest was similar. These HRQoL results with PVd along with previously demonstrated improvement in PFS vs Vd continue to support its use in patients with RRMM. © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group., Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, BMS Novartis Pharma Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, BMS AstraZeneca Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Johnson and Johnson, J&J Janssen Biotech Sanofi Pfizer Celgene Amgen Merck KGaA Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Medical writing support was provided by Nora Tu, PharmD, and Stephen Gilliver, PhD, of Evidera and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb., KW: advisory board for and honoraria from Amgen, Adaptive Biotech, Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Juno, Takeda, Sanofi and research funding from Amgen, Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Sanofi, Janssen; MD: honoraria, consulting fees, and lecture fees from Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Amgen, Takeda; PM: personal fees from Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Janssen; MY: nothing to disclose; AL: honoraria and personal fees from Amgen, honoraria, advisory board, and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Janssen, and advisory board for Takeda; ASK: nothing to disclose; FV: nothing to disclose; NC: nothing to disclose; SB: nothing to disclose; PJ: nothing to disclose; PB: stock ownership in Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Teva, Johnson & Johnson and honoraria from Merck, AstraZeneca; MH: nothing to disclose; PRO: personal fees, lectures, and advisory boards for Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Janssen and personal fees and advisory boards for Kite Pharma, AbbVie, Sanofi; EM: nothing to disclose; PA: nothing to disclose; PH: nothing to disclose; MTK: consultancy for and honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Takeda, Novartis, and Janssen; PL: advisory board for and honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi; DBY: nothing to disclose; LM: nothing to disclose; SG: consulting fees from Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company; XY: employee for and salary/compensation from Bristol Myers Squibb; LG: employment with Bristol Myers Squibb; TB: employment and equity ownership in Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company; SD: employment and equity ownership in Bristol Myers Squibb; PR: grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Oncopeptides, Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Takeda, and personal fees from Karyopharm, Amgen, Janssen, Sanofi.

Sperm quality in lymphoma patients may be reduced even prior to initiation of chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between lymphoma prognostic factors and sperm quality prior to chemotherapy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Hadassah Medical Center sperm bank and the Hematology department. The cohort included 101 Hodgkin's and 90 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients that underwent sperm cryopreservation before chemotherapy between 1998 and 2015. Known lymphoma prognostic factors were compared between patients with normal and impaired sperm parameters. The Prognostic Score Ratio (PSR), an index representing the number of negative lymphoma prognostic measures that found in a lymphoma patient, was additionally calculated and compared between the groups. Among the prognostic factors of lymphoma, the following factors were found to be associated with impaired sperm parameters-low albumin (p < 0.001) and haemoglobin (p < 0.001) levels, B symptoms (p = 0.021) and PSR (p < 0.001). Logistic regression showed significant association of albumin and haemoglobin with reduced sperm quality (OR = 2.7 and OR = 13.5, p < 0.05; respectively). To conclude, low albumin and haemoglobin levels are related to reduced sperm quality. The linkage between these prognostic factors and sperm quality may be related to a general inflammatory status.

We previously showed that Livin, an inhibitor of apoptosis protein, is specifically cleaved to produce a truncated protein, tLivin, and demonstrated its paradoxical proapoptotic activity. We further demonstrated that mini-tLivin (MTV), a 70 amino acids derivative of tLivin, is a proapoptotic protein as potent as tLivin. Based on these findings, in this study we aimed to develop a venue to target MTV for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). MTV was conjugated to poly (lactide-co-glycolic acid) surface-activated nanoparticles (NPs). In order to target MTV-NPs we also conjugated CD40 ligand (CD40L) to the surface of the NPs and evaluated the efficacy of the bifunctional CD40L-MTV-NPs. In vitro, CD40L-MTV-NPs elicited significant apoptosis of DLBCL cells. In a disseminated mouse model of DLBCL, 37.5% of MTV-NPs treated mice survived at the end of the experiment. Targeting MTV-NPs using CD40L greatly improved survival and 71.4% of these mice survived. CD40L-MTV-NPs also greatly reduced CNS involvement of DLBCL. Only 20% of these mice presented infiltration of lymphoma to the brain in comparison to 77% of the MTV-NPs treated mice. In a subcutaneous mouse model, CD40L-MTV-NPs significantly reduced tumor volume in correlation with significant increased caspase-3 activity. Thus, targeted MTV-NPs suggest a novel approach to overcome apoptosis resistance in cancer.

Summary Background In the LYM-3002 study, the efficacy and safety of frontline bortezomib plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VR-CAP) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) were compared in transplant-ineligible patients with untreated, newly diagnosed, mantle cell lymphoma. We report the final overall survival and safety outcomes for patients in the long-term follow-up phase after the primary progression-free-survival endpoint was met. Methods LYM-3002 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done at 128 clinical centres in 28 countries in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Adult patients with confirmed stage II–IV previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less, who were ineligible for bone marrow transplantation, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six or eight 21-day cycles of VR-CAP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2, plus oral prednisone 100 mg/m2) or R-CHOP (intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 [2 mg maximum], rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, plus oral prednisone 100 mg/m2). Randomisation was done according to a computer-generated randomisation schedule prepared by the sponsor; permuted blocks central randomisation was used (block size of 4), and was stratified by International Prognostic Index score and disease stage at diagnosis. The primary endpoint of this final analysis was overall survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00722137 , and is closed to new participants with follow-up completed. Findings Between May 22, 2008, and Dec 5, 2011, 487 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. 268 patients (140 in the VR-CAP group and 128 in the R-CHOP group) were included in the follow-up analysis, which included patients with data available after the primary analysis clinical cutoff date of Dec 2, 2013. After median follow-up of 82·0 months (IQR 74·1–94·2), median overall survival was significantly longer in the VR-CAP group than in the R-CHOP group (90·7 months [95% CI 71·4 to not estimable] vs 55·7 months [47·2 to 68·9]; hazard ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·51–0·85]; p=0·001). Three new adverse events were reported since the primary analysis cutoff (one each of grade 4 lung adenocarcinoma and grade 4 gastric cancer in the VR-CAP group, and one case of grade 2 pneumonia in the R-CHOP group). 103 (42%) of 243 patients in the VR-CAP group, and 138 (57%) of 244 in the R-CHOP group died; the most common cause of death was progressive disease. Interpretations Compared with R-CHOP, VR-CAP was associated with significantly longer survival, and had a manageable and expected safety profile. Our results support further assessment of VR-CAP in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma. Funding Janssen Research & Development.

Previous studies and meta-analyses addressing COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) have reported dramatically high mortality rates of up to 34% [Vigenthira 2020, Garcia-Suarez 2020, Sharafeldin 2021]. These studies, however, were strongly biased towards hospitalized patients, and poorly represented patients who experienced a milder course of COVID-19, not requiring hospitalization. Jerusalem and its metropolitan area, comprising of over 1.3 million inhabitants, was the epicenter of Israel's COVID-19 crisis, with over 200,000 cases. Hadassah Medical Center, one of only two tertiary centers serving this multi-ethnic population, houses a Hematology Department that includes inpatient services, a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) center, day care services and in-campus outpatient clinics. From February 20 th, 2020, we tracked patients with confirmed COVID-19 reporting to their treating hematologists while being hospitalized due to COVID-19, at routine visits to the hematology services, or remotely via phone or email communication. This assured the representation of COVID-19 cases of various clinical severities. Data were collected retrospectively and included demographics, comorbidities, hematological diagnoses and treatments, course of COVID-19 and, importantly, source of infection. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess association between prognostic factors and outcomes including hospitalization, severe COVID-19 (per updated WHO criteria) and critical COVID-19, defined as a composite of ICU admission and mortality. Almost all the patients in this series were diagnosed prior to their vaccination. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single center series of HM patients with COVID-19 reported to date. Our series included 183 patients. Median age was 62.5 years, 57% were men, and 72% had at least one comorbidity. The most frequent hematological diagnoses were indolent lymphoma and CLL (40%), aggressive lymphoma (20%) and multiple myeloma (19%). At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 41% of the patients were receiving systemic anti-neoplastic treatment (excluding TKIs for CML and hydroxyurea for MPN), and 16% had undergone a previous allogeneic or autologous HSCT. Overall mortality, severe COVID-19, and hospitalization rates in the entire group were 9.8%, 14.2% and 32%, respectively, remarkably lower than in previous reports. Of the patients not receiving anti-neoplastic treatment, mortality and severe COVID-19 rates were comparable to those of the age-matched general population according to the Israeli Ministry of Health database [Table 1]. Consistent with previous studies, ischemic heart disease (IHD), dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, smoking and hypertension, as well as age and active anti-neoplastic treatment, each emerged as a risk factor significantly associated with hospitalization due to COVID-19 [Fig. 1, Table 2]. IHD, smoking, age and active treatment remained significant in multivariate analysis. Age and active treatment as well as ≥4 comorbidities were significantly associated with critical COVID-19. Interestingly, we observed a strong association between the number of prior anti-neoplastic treatment lines and critical COVID-19. Neither history of HSCT nor treatment with monoclonal antibodies were associated with COVID-19 outcomes. Notably, we did not detect any patient that contracted COVID-19 within the Hematology Department services, both inpatient and outpatient. Taken together, we present a different COVID-19 severity landscape in patients with HM as compared to previous observations. While active treatment was significantly associated with COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality, these rates were remarkably lower than previously reported. Despite harboring various degrees of immune suppression, patients with stable or indolent diseases not receiving active treatment appeared to be at a risk comparable to that of the age-matched general population, which depended largely on age and comorbidities. Routine preventive measures including symptom questioning, masks, and social distancing in both our inpatient and outpatient services provided a COVID-19-safe environment, obviating the need for changes in treatment schedules or assignment. These findings may have important consequences for future management of patients with HM in COVID-19 affected regions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lavie: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Fees for lectures; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Other: Fees for lectures; Roche: Other: Fees for lectures; Novartis: Other: Fees for lectures; Takeda: Consultancy. Goldschmidt: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Summary This multicentre study evaluated 5-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in early and advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), where therapy was individualized based on initial prognostic factors and positron emission tomography-computed tomography performed after two cycles (PET-2). Between September 2006 and August 2013, 359 patients aged 18–60 years, were recruited in nine Israeli centres. Early-HL patients initially received ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) ×2. Depending on initial unfavourable prognostic features, PET-2-positive patients received additional ABVD followed by involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT). Patients with negative PET-2 and favourable disease received ISRT or ABVD ×2; those with unfavourable disease received ABVD ×2 with ISRT or, alternatively, ABVD ×4. Advanced-HL patients initially received ABVD ×2 or escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone; EB) ×2 based on their international prognostic score (≤2 or ≥3). PET-2-negative patients further received ABVD ×4; PET-2-positive patients received EB ×4 and ISRT to residual masses. With a median follow-up of 55 (13–119) months, 5-year PFS was 91% and 69% for PET-2-negative and positive early-HL, respectively; 5-year OS was 100% and 95%, respectively. For advanced-HL, the PFS was 81% and 68%, respectively (P = 0·08); 5-year OS was 98% and 91%, respectively. PET-2 positivity is associated with inferior prognosis in early-HL, even with additional ABVD and ISRT. Advanced-HL patients benefit from therapy escalation following positive PET-2. EB can be safely de-escalated to ABVD in PET-2-negative patients.

The JAK2V617F mutation that results in a hyper-activation of the JAK2 kinase in the erythropoietin pathway is a molecular marker for myeloproliferative neoplasms. Using allele-specific Real-Time PCR, we detected the mutation in the blood of 17.3% (17/98) of normal donors; the mutant allele burden was, however, very low ( 1% in polycythemia vera). It was much higher in differentiated blood cells in the peripheral blood than in undifferentiated CD34+ cells. Erythropoietin-stimulated differentiation of normal CD34+ cells in liquid culture increased the mutation frequency by 3.34-fold. When progenitors from 9 normal donors were grown in erythropoietin-stimulated semi-solid cultures, the mutation was found in 8.69% of the colonies, but only in

Perifosine, an investigational, oral, synthetic alkylphospholipid, inhibits signal transduction pathways of relevance in multiple myeloma (MM) including PI3K/Akt. Perifosine demonstrated anti-MM activity in preclinical studies and encouraging early-phase clinical activity in combination with bortezomib. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study was conducted to evaluate addition of perifosine to bortezomib-dexamethasone in MM patients with one to four prior therapies who had relapsed following previous bortezomib-based therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The study was discontinued at planned interim analysis, with 135 patients enrolled. Median PFS was 22.7 weeks (95% confidence interval 16·0-45·4) in the perifosine arm and 39.0 weeks (18.3-50.1) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio 1.269 [0.817-1.969]

Extramedullary disease is relatively frequent in multiple myeloma, but our knowledge on the subject is limited and mainly relies on small case series or single center experiences. Little is known regarding the role of new drugs in this setting. We performed a meta-analysis of eight trials focused on the description of extramedullary disease characteristics, clinical outcome, and response to new drugs. A total of 2,332 newly diagnosed myeloma patients have been included; 267 (11.4%) had extramedullary disease, defined as paraosseous in 243 (10.4%), extramedullary plasmocytoma in 12 (0.5%), and not classified in 12 (0.5%) patients. Median progression-free survival was 25.3 months and 25.2 in extramedullary disease and non-extramedullary disease patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis the presence of extramedullary disease did not impact on progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.15, P=0.06), while other known prognostic factors retained their significance. Patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs, mainly lenalidomide, or proteasome inhibitors had similar progression-free survival and progression-free survival-2 regardless of extramedullary disease presence. Median overall survival was 63.5 months and 79.9 months (P=0.01) in extramedullary and non-extramedullary disease patients, respectively, and in multivariate analysis the presence of extramedullary disease was associated with a reduced overall survival (hazard ratio 1.41, P

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has become increasingly popular in most Western countries. As a result, safety-related issues associated with these practices have become more apparent, including adverse effects and negative interactions with conventional medical therapies. The potential dangers associated with CAM are further exacerbated by the absence of high-quality clinical research on the subject; a lack of a basic understanding of the principles of CAM among physicians; and a reluctance of patients to disclose their use of CAM, including those modalities being used in parallel with conventional medical treatments. The increase in CAM use by their patients and the increased potential for harmful effects and interactions are central to the increasing interest among physicians and other healthcare professionals in learning more about CAM paradigms and practices of care. In light of this increasing interest in CAM, the majority of medical schools in the U.S. and Canada and a large number in Europe are providing their students with compulsory or elective courses on this subject. A similar process is taking place in Israel, with the Faculty of Medicine at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem having completed its first compulsory course in CAM at the Hadassah University Medical Center, Ein Karem. The increased use of CAM presents a number of challenges to the conventional medical profession. Medical schools can and should provide students with the knowledge and skills which will enable them to discuss CAM use with their patients, providing evidence-based guidance on the safe and effective use of these modalities.

Overt central nervous system (CNS) involvement in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is rare at diagnosis. Much effort is put to identify risk factors for occult CNS involvement, and the risk assessment of CNS relapse. Prophylactic treatment carries risk of adverse events and its efficacy is not clear. Detection of cerebrospinal fluid molecular gene rearrangement (GRR) as a method to detect occult disease has been studied in acute leukemia and primary CNS lymphoma. To date, the capacity of a positive GRR in newly diagnosed NHL patients to predict CNS relapse has not been addressed. We retrospectively studied the prognostic value of GRR in cerebrospinal fluid samples of 148 newly diagnosed patients with high grade NHL. We demonstrate that positive GRR at diagnosis does not affect PFS or OS and did not predict CNS relapse. However, although numbers were small, repeated positive samples (≥ 2) correlated with a higher risk for CNS relapse (p = 0.048), possibly stressing the need for an aggressive preventive approach.

Summary Background Preclinical studies have shown synergistic antitumour effects between ibrutinib and immune-checkpoint blockade. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and activity of ibrutinib in combination with nivolumab in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignant diseases. Methods We did a two-part, open-label, phase 1/2a study at 21 hospitals in Australia, Israel, Poland, Spain, Turkey, and the USA. The primary objective of part A (dose escalation) was to assess the safety of daily oral ibrutinib (420 mg or 560 mg) in combination with intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) to ascertain a recommended phase 2 dose in patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (del17p or del11q), follicular lymphoma, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Dose optimisation was investigated using a modified toxicity probability interval design. The primary objective of the part B expansion phase was to establish the preliminary activity (the proportion of patients who achieved an overall response) of the combination of ibrutinib and nivolumab in four cohorts: relapsed or refractory high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (del17p or del11q), follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and Richter's transformation. All participants who received at least one dose of treatment were included in the primary analysis and analyses were done by disease cohort. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02329847. The trial is ongoing. Findings Between March 12, 2015, and April 11, 2017, 144 patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients died before receiving study treatment; thus, 141 patients were included in the analysis, 14 in part A and 127 in part B. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 hyperbilirubinaemia) was reported at the 420 mg dose in the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cohort, which resolved after 5 days. The combination of ibrutinib and nivolumab led to overall responses in 22 (61%) of 36 patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma, 13 (33%) of 40 patients with follicular lymphoma, 16 (36%) of 45 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and 13 (65%) of 20 patients with Richter's transformation. The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhoea (47 [33%] of 141 patients), neutropenia (44 [31%]), and fatigue (37 [26%]). 11 (8%) of 141 patients had adverse events leading to death; none were reported as drug-related. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (40 [28%] of 141 patients) and anaemia (32 [23%]). The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia ranged from eight (18%) of 45 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to 19 (53%) of 36 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma; incidence of grade 3–4 anaemia ranged from five (13%) of 40 patients with follicular lymphoma to seven (35%) of 20 patients with Richter's transformation. The most common serious adverse events included anaemia (six [4%] of 141 patients) and pneumonia (five [4%]). The most common grade 3–4 immune-related adverse events were rash (11 [8%] of 141 patients) and increased alanine aminotransferase (three [2%]). Interpretation The combination of ibrutinib and nivolumab had an acceptable safety profile and preliminary activity was similar to that reported with single-agent ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The clinical response in patients with Richter's transformation was promising and supports further clinical assessment. Funding Janssen R&D.

We retrospectively studied the prognostic role of molecular (gene rearrangement, GRR) bone marrow (BM) involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 424 patients) and in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL, 67 patients). When correlating BM GRR to histological findings at diagnosis, the GRR test was more sensitive (p = 0.036) but less specific (p

Background Daratumumab showed promising efficacy alone and with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in a phase 1-2 study involving patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 569 patients with multiple myeloma who had received one or more previous lines of therapy to receive lenalidomide and dexamethasone either alone (control group) or in combination with daratumumab (daratumumab group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Results At a median follow-up of 13.5 months in a protocol-specified interim analysis, 169 events of disease progression or death were observed (in 53 of 286 patients [18.5%] in the daratumumab group vs. 116 of 283 [41.0%] in the control group; hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.52; P

The presence of certain high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, such as translocations (4;14) and (14;16) and deletion (17p), are known to have a negative impact on survival in multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 3 study ASPIRE (N = 792) demonstrated that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd), compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed MM. This preplanned subgroup analysis of ASPIRE was conducted to evaluate KRd vs Rd by baseline cytogenetics according to fluorescence in situ hybridization. Of 417 patients with known cytogenetic risk status, 100 patients (24%) were categorized with high-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 48; Rd, n = 52) and 317 (76%) were categorized with standard-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 147; Rd, n = 170). For patients with high-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd resulted in a median PFS of 23.1 months, a 9-month improvement relative to treatment with Rd. For patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd led to a 10-month improvement in median PFS vs Rd. The overall response rates for KRd vs Rd were 79.2% vs 59.6% (high-risk cytogenetics) and 91.2% vs 73.5% (standard-risk cytogenetics); approximately fivefold as many patients with high- or standard-risk cytogenetics achieved a complete response or better with KRd vs Rd (29.2% vs 5.8% and 38.1% vs 6.5%, respectively). KRd improved but did not abrogate the poor prognosis associated with high-risk cytogenetics. This regimen had a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with relapsed MM, irrespective of cytogenetic risk status, and should be considered a standard of care in these patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01080391.

Outcomes in primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBL) improved with the introduction of dose intense treatments, consolidation radiotherapy and rituximab. DA-EPOCH-R, which omits radiotherapy has been adopted with worldwide enthusiasm, despite lack of proven superiority in randomized trials. We aimed to evaluate the course and outcome of PMBL using an alternative intensive rituximab-containing regimen, RCHOP-RICE. We also evaluated the prognostic value of 18FDG-PET-CT (PET-CT). We reviewed the clinical, laboratory and imaging data of PMBL patients receiving 1st-line treatment in Hadassah Medical Center between 8/2002 and 10/2014. Of 47 PMBL patients, 24 (51 %) were treated with RCHOP-RICE and 23 (49 %) with other protocols. Overall, the 5-year progression-free survival was 93 % and the overall survival was 98 % (87 and 100 %, respectively, for the RCHOP-RICE regimen). Patient characteristics and treatment toxicities were balanced among protocols. A mean of 11.1 ± 1.3 hospitalization days/patient were needed to administer RCHOP-RICE regimen compared to 37 ± 2 days/patient for DA-EPOCH-R (n = 2). Radiotherapy was given to 3 patients (12 %) treated with RCHOP-RICE compared to 18 patients (78 %) treated with other protocols (p

BACKGROUND: Based on the encouraging activity and manageable safety profile observed in a phase 1 study, the ECHELON-2 trial was initiated to compare the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) for the treatment of CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas.METHODS: ECHELON-2 is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, placebo-controlled, active-comparator phase 3 study. Eligible adults from 132 sites in 17 countries with previously untreated CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas (targeting 75% with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either A+CHP or CHOP for six or eight 21-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by histological subtype according to local pathology assessment and by international prognostic index score. All patients received cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle intravenously and prednisone 100 mg once daily on days 1 to 5 of each cycle orally, followed by either brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg and a placebo form of vincristine intravenously (A+CHP group) or vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 and a placebo form of brentuximab vedotin intravenously (CHOP group) on day 1 of each cycle. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival according to blinded independent central review, was analysed by intent-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01777152.FINDINGS: Between Jan 24, 2013, and Nov 7, 2016, 601 patients assessed for eligibility, of whom 452 patients were enrolled and 226 were randomly assigned to both the A+CHP group and the CHOP group. Median progression-free survival was 48·2 months (95% CI 35·2-not evaluable) in the A+CHP group and 20·8 months (12·7-47·6) in the CHOP group (hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·54-0·93], p=0·0110). Adverse events, including incidence and severity of febrile neutropenia (41 [18%] patients in the A+CHP group and 33 [15%] in the CHOP group) and peripheral neuropathy (117 [52%] in the A+CHP group and 124 [55%] in the CHOP group), were similar between groups. Fatal adverse events occurred in seven (3%) patients in the A+CHP group and nine (4%) in the CHOP group.INTERPRETATION: Front-line treatment with A+CHP is superior to CHOP for patients with CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas as shown by a significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival with a manageable safety profile.FUNDING: Seattle Genetics Inc, Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmacuetical Company Limited, and National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Cancer Center.

Background Both single-agent ibrutinib and chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab have shown superior efficacy to chlorambucil monotherapy and are standard first-line treatments in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. We compared the efficacy of the combination of ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in first-line chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. Methods iLLUMINATE is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial done at 74 academic and community hospitals in Australia, Canada, Israel, New Zealand, Russia, Turkey, the EU, and the USA in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma, either aged 65 years or older or younger than 65 years with coexisting conditions. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a blocked randomisation schedule, stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and cytogenetics, to receive ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab (oral ibrutinib [420 mg once daily continuously] combined with intravenous obinutuzumab [100 mg on day 1,900 mg on day 2,1000 mg on day 8, and 1000 mg on day 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles, for a total of six cycles]) or chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (oral chlorambucil [0.5 mg/kg bodyweight on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for six cycles] combined with the same obinutuzumab regimen). Allocation concealment was achieved using an interactive web response system. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by a masked independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02264574), and patient enrolment is complete. Findings Between Oct 6, 2014, and Oct 12, 2015, 229 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab (n=113) or chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (n=116). After a median follow-up of 31.3 months (IQR 29.4-33.2), median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab group (median not reached [95% CI 33.6-non-estimable]) than in the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab group (19.0 months [15.1-22.1]; hazard ratio 0.23; 95% CI 0.15-0.37; p

Background : Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, is approved in the US and EU for patients (pts) with CLL and allows for treatment without chemotherapy. Standard of care for first-line CLL in older pts or those with comorbidities includes single-agent ibr and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) with chlorambucil (clb) plus anti-CD20 therapy. As the addition of obinutuzumab (G) to clb provides superior efficacy over clb alone or rituximab-G, we investigated the potential for improved efficacy with addition of G to single-agent ibr vs clb-G in an international, open-label, randomized phase 3 study (PCYC-1130; iLLUMINATE) in first-line CLL/SLL. Methods : Eligible pts had previously untreated CLL/SLL requiring treatment per iwCLL criteria and were ≥65 years of age or were 6, creatinine clearance Results : A total of 229 pts were randomized to ibr-G (n=113) or clb-G (n=116). Median age was 71 years (range, 40-87) and 65% of pts had high-risk genomic features. At a median follow-up of 31.3 mo, ibr-G significantly prolonged IRC-assessed PFS compared with clb-G (median not reached [NR] vs 19.0 mo; HR 0.231; 95% CI, 0.145-0.367; P Conclusions : Ibr-G resulted in superior PFS regardless of high-risk genomic features, compared with clb-G, a standard CIT regimen. Response rates and depth of remission (CR and undetectable MRD) were also higher with ibr-G. Combination therapy with ibr-G was tolerable with no new safety signals identified and represents an effective chemotherapy-free treatment option for first-line CLL/SLL including the high-risk population. Disclosures Moreno: Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy. Greil:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sandoz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Demirkan:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding. Tedeschi:Gilead: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Larratt:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Simkovic:Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding. Novak:Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Strugov:Beigene Ltd: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Equity Ownership; Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc: Equity Ownership; Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; TG Therapeutics Inc: Equity Ownership; Loxo Oncology Inc: Equity Ownership; Crispr Therapeutics AG: Equity Ownership; Intellia Therapeutics Inc: Equity Ownership; Editas Medicine Inc.: Equity Ownership; Ignyta Inc.: Equity Ownership; Astellas: Honoraria; AbbVie: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen: Honoraria; ECO-SAFETY Medical Center: Employment; Aptose Biosciences Inc: Equity Ownership; Esperion Therapeutics Inc: Equity Ownership; Merck & Company: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Gill:Janssen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau. Gribben:Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; NIH: Research Funding; Wellcome Trust: Research Funding; Unum: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cancer Research UK: Research Funding; Medical Research Council: Research Funding. Hsu:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Zhou:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Clow:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: LEADERSHIP; TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES. James:AbbVie: Equity Ownership, Other: Spouse's employment and stocks, Patents & Royalties: AbbVie Patent Applications; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Styles:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Flinn:Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; ArQule: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding.

Associations of organochlorine (OC) pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) with non-Hodgkin lymphoma are controversial. We compared serum levels of 6 OC pesticides and 38 PCBs in Israeli Jews (IJ) and Palestinian Arabs (PA) and assessed possible associations with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Ninety B-NHL cases (50 IJ and 40 PA) and 120 controls (65 IJ and 55 PA) were included. Median concentrations of analytes in controls were compared across ethnic groups using quantile regression, adjusting for age and sex. We used logistic regression to derive odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for detectable analytes and B-NHL, adjusting for age, ethnic group, faming and body mass index. Median values of PCBs and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) were higher in IJ vs PA controls (P = 0.0007), as were several PCBs (74, 99, 118, 138, 146, 153, 156, 163, 170, and 180). Overall, OC pesticide and PCB exposures were comparable with reports from high-income countries. B-NHL was associated with PCB 146 (OR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.83), PCB 156 (OR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.89), and high-chlorinated PCBs (OR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.40) in all study subjects. These associations were robust in quantile as well as sensitivity analyses. An association of DDE with B-NHL was noted in PA (OR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07, 2.77), but not in IJ (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.59, 1.27). Although high-chlorinated PCB concentrations did not indicate high exposure levels, our findings indicate that B-NHL may be associated with this exposure.

Objective Daratumumab is a promising new antimyeloma agent. We report a single center "real-world" series of multiple myeloma (MM) and amyloidosis (AL) patients treated with daratumumab. Methods Forty-one patients were included: 7 second-line MM, 30 heavily pretreated (median number of therapies of 5) advanced MM, and 4 with AL. Results Second-line patients and advanced AL showed high rate of durable overall responses. However, advanced MM patients had a dismal prognosis with an overall response rate (ORR) of 36%, and a short median progression-free and overall survival of 2.3 and 6.6 months, respectively. Responses were particularly poor in patients with extramedullary plasmacytomas. Neither the addition of another agent to daratumumab nor changing to the next line of therapy produced significant durable responses in this patient population. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that CD38 expression level was not predictive of response. We show that CD38 expression dynamics by a commercially available anti-CD38 antibody after daratumumab administration was hindered by competitive binding of daratumumab. Conclusions Responses to daratumumab and combinations in patients with advanced MM, particularly with extramedullary disease, are low and short-lived, stressing the administration of this agent should be early in the course of the disease.

This phase II, single-arm, multicenter study examined the efficacy and safety of coltuximab ravtansine (an anti-CD19 antibody drug conjugate) in 61 patients with histologically documented (de novo or transformed) relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who had previously received rituximab-containing immuno-chemotherapy. Patients had received a median of 2.0 (range 0-9) prior treatment regimens for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and almost half (45.9%) had bulky disease (≥1 lesion >5 cm) at trial entry. Patients received coltuximab ravtansine (55 mg/m2) in 4 weekly and 4 biweekly administrations until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Forty-one patients were eligible for inclusion in the per protocol population. Overall response rate (International Working Group criteria) in the per protocol population, the primary end point, was 18/41 [43.9%; 90% confidence interval (CI:) 30.6-57.9%]. Median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival (all treated patients) were 4.7 (range 0.0-8.8) months, 4.4 (90%CI: 3.02-5.78) months, and 9.2 (90%CI: 6.57-12.09) months, respectively. Common non-hematologic adverse events included asthenia/fatigue (30%), nausea (23%), and diarrhea (20%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 23 patients (38%), the most frequent being hepatotoxicity (3%) and abdominal pain (3%). Eye disorders occurred in 15 patients (25%); all were grade 1-2 and none required a dose modification. Coltuximab ravtansine monotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in moderate clinical responses in pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. (Registered at: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01472887). ispartof: HAEMATOLOGICA vol:103 issue:8 pages:1351-1358 ispartof: location:Italy status: published

Maintenance demonstrated to improve survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients and the achievement of complete response (CR) is a strong predictor of survival. Nevertheless, the role of maintenance according to response after induction/consolidation has not been investigated so far. To evaluate the impact of maintenance according to response, we pooled together and retrospectively analyzed data from 955 NDMM patients enrolled in two trials (GIMEMA-MM-03-05 and RV-MM-PI-209). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS)1, PFS2 and overall survival (OS) of CR patients randomized to maintenance and no maintenance. Secondary endpoints were PFS1, PFS2 and OS in very good partial response/partial response (VGPR/PR) patients. Overall, 213 patients obtained CR after induction/consolidation, 118 received maintenance and 95 no maintenance. In patients achieving CR, maintenance significantly improved PFS1 (HR 0.50, P

Although autoimmune diseases (AIDs) are known to predispose to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), their association with NHL prognosis has rarely been investigated. We examined associations between autoimmunity and B-cell NHL onset by comparing AID history (determined by self-report and medication review and supplemented by chart review where possible) among 435 adult B-NHL patients in Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, diagnosed 2009-2014, and 414 age-and-sex frequency-matched controls. We examined AIDs as a whole, B- and T-cell–mediated AIDs, and autoimmune thyroid diseases. Among cases, we used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models to assess the association of AID with overall survival and relapse-free survival, adjusting for prognostically important patient and disease characteristics such as Ki67% staining, International Prognostic Index, rituximab treatment, and histological subgroup. Autoimmune diseases were associated with B-NHL (odds ratio [OR] = 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31-2.92), especially AIDs mediated by B-cell activation (OR = 5.20; CI, 1.90-14.3), which were particularly associated with marginal zone lymphoma (OR = 19.3; CI, 4.59-80.9). We found that time to relapse for all B-NHL patients with AIDs was significantly shorter (mean of 49.21 mo [±3.22]) than among patients without AID (mean of 59.74 mo [±1.62]), adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj] = 1.69 (CI, 1.03-2.79). Specifically, in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, of whom 91.8% had received rituximab, a history of B-cell–mediated AIDs was associated with shorter relapse-free survival and overall survival, HRadj = 8.34 (CI, 3.01-23.1) and HRadj = 3.83 (CI, 1.20-12.3), respectively. Beyond confirming the well-known association between AIDs and B-NHL, we found that AID is an adverse prognostic factor in B-cell lymphoma, associated with a shortened time to relapse, suggesting that there are specific therapeutic challenges in the subgroup of patients suffering from both these diseases. Further work is required to address mechanisms of resistance to standard treatment in the setting of AID-associated B-NHL. In the era of immunotherapy, these findings have particular relevance.

Certain cytogenetic abnormalities are known to adversely impact outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) compared with placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (placebo-Rd). This preplanned analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of IRd vs placebo-Rd according to cytogenetic risk, as assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization. High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were defined as del(17p), t(4;14), and/or t(14;16); additionally, patients were assessed for 1q21 amplification. Of 722 randomized patients, 552 had cytogenetic results; 137 (25%) had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and 172 (32%) had 1q21 amplification alone. PFS was improved with IRd vs placebo-Rd in both high-risk and standard-risk cytogenetics subgroups: in high-risk patients, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.543 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.321-0.918; P = .021), with median PFS of 21.4 vs 9.7 months; in standard-risk patients, HR was 0.640 (95% CI, 0.462-0.888; P = .007), with median PFS of 20.6 vs 15.6 months. This PFS benefit was consistent across subgroups with individual high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, including patients with del(17p) (HR, 0.596; 95% CI, 0.286-1.243). PFS was also longer with IRd vs placebo-Rd in patients with 1q21 amplification (HR, 0.781; 95% CI, 0.492-1.240), and in the “expanded high-risk” group, defined as those with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and/or 1q21 amplification (HR, 0.664; 95% CI, 0.474-0.928). IRd demonstrated substantial benefit compared with placebo-Rd in relapsed and/or refractory MM (RRMM) patients with high-risk and standard-risk cytogenetics, and improves the poor PFS associated with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01564537.

Background Mechanisms that inactivate the p53 pathway in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), other than rare mutations, are still not well understood. Methods We performed a bioinformatics study of the p53 pathway function at the gene expression level on our collection of 1153 p53-pathway related genes. Publically available Affymetrix data of 607 de-novo AML patients at diagnosis were analyzed according to the patients cytogenetic, FAB and molecular mutations subtypes. We further investigated the functional status of the p53 pathway in cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) and Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) patients using bioinformatics, Real-Time PCR and immunohistochemistry. Results We revealed significant and differential alterations of p53 pathway-related gene expression in most of the AML subtypes. We found that p53 pathway-related gene expression was not correlated with the accepted grouping of AML subtypes such as by cytogenetically-based prognosis, morphological stage or by the type of molecular mutation. Our bioinformatic analysis revealed that p53 is not functional in CN-AML and APL blasts at inducing its most important functional outcomes: cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, DNA repair and oxidative stress defense. We revealed transcriptional downregulation of important p53 acetyltransferases in both CN-AML and APL, accompanied by increased Mdmx protein expression and inadequate Chk2 protein activation. Conclusions Our bioinformatic analysis demonstrated that p53 pathway is differentially inactivated in different AML subtypes. Focused gene and protein analysis of p53 pathway in CN-AML and APL patients imply that functional inactivation of p53 protein can be attributed to its impaired acetylation. Our analysis indicates the need in further accurate evaluation of p53 pathway functioning and regulation in distinct subtypes of AML. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12920-017-0249-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A phase 1/2a study (LYM1002 [EudraCT 2014-005191-28]) of ibr (560 mg once daily) + nivo (3 mg/kg on a 14-day cycle) demonstrated acceptable safety and promising efficacy vs single-agent ibr in Richter’s transformation (RT), follicular lymphoma (FL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We examined potential biomarkers of treatment (tx) response using archived biopsy samples. GEP was used for DLBCL subtyping and to assess proportions of 22 distinct immune cells. Exome data were generated from 72 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, and sequencing analysis was used to identify mutations in genes of interest and assess somatic mutation burden. The correlations of immune cell proportions and gene variants were evaluated by investigator-assessed responses in each histology and by ongoing responses in DLBCL patients (pts; progression-free survival [PFS] > 24 months, n = 7 vs not, n = 20). In pts with available GEP and response data, overall response rates were 29.6% (8/27) for DLBCL, 43.5% (10/23) for FL and 81.3% (13/16) for RT. Proportions of CD8 and follicular helper T cells, M1 macrophages, and resting dendritic cells were higher in DLBCL responders vs nonresponders, while the proportion of regulatory T cells was decreased. These subsets did not differ by response in FL although an increase of CD4 memory resting T-cells was noted in responders. The trend toward increased follicular helper T cell and resting dendritic cell proportions in DLBCL pts was also associated with longer survival (PFS > 24 months) vs not. Gene variant data and responder status were available for 26 pts with DLBCL, 26 with FL, and 17 with RT. Comparison between responders and nonresponders showed that DLBCL pts with RNF213 (4/10 [40.0%] vs 1/16 [6.2%]) and KLHL14 (3/10 [30.0%] vs 0/16) mutations were more likely to respond to ibr + nivo. Conversely, nonresponders were associated with variants in EBF1, ADAMTS20, AKAP9, SOCS1, TP53, and genes in BCR pathways such as TNFRSF14, MYD88, and NFKB1B. BCL2 mutation in FL (9/12 [75.0%] vs 4/14 [28.6%]) and ROS1 mutation in RT (0/13 vs 2/4 [50.0%]) were associated with response; both are involved in the NF-kB pathway. In DLBCL, the most frequent gene mutations were RNF213, NBPF1, and BCL2 in pts who had PFS > 24 months (3/7 [42.9%] each), and KMT2D (8/20 [40.0%]) and CSMD3 (8/20 [40.0%]) in pts who did not. Somatic mutation burden was lower in responders vs nonresponders, especially in germinal center B-cell-DLBCL, and in DLBCL pts with PFS > 24 months vs not. In conclusion, we report gene variations among DLBCL, FL, and RT pts associated with response or durable PFS with ibr + nivo. While ibr inhibits Bruton’s tyrosine kinase-dependent pathways, we identify alternative gene pathway variants that may impact tx outcomes. Immune cell infiltration into the microenvironment relates to differential tx response with this immune combination and is histology dependent. Citation Format: Brendan Hodkinson, Michael Schaffer, Joshua Brody, Wojciech Jurczak, Cecilia Carpio, Dina Ben-Yehuda, Irit Avivi, Rao Saleem, Muhit Özcan, John Alvarez, Rob Ceulemans, Nele Fourneau, Sriram Balasubramanian, Anas Younes. Phase 1/2a LYM1002 study of ibrutinib (ibr) + nivolumab (nivo): Exome and gene expression profiling (GEP) analyses by histology and responder status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4024.

This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter study compared carfilzomib monotherapy against low-dose corticosteroids and optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients were randomized (1: 1) to receive carfilzomib (10-min intravenous infusion; 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 27 mg/m(2) thereafter) or a control regimen of low-dose corticosteroids (84 mg of dexamethasone or equivalent corticosteroid) with optional cyclophosphamide (1400 mg) for 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Three-hundred and fifteen patients were randomized to carfilzomib (n = 157) or control (n = 158). Both groups had a median of five prior regimens. In the control group, 95% of patients received cyclophosphamide. Median OS was 10.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4-14.4) vs 10.0 months (95% CI 7.7-12.0) with carfilzomib vs control (hazard ratio = 0.975; 95% CI 0.760-1.249; P = 0.4172). Progression-free survival was similar between groups; overall response rate was higher with carfilzomib (19.1 vs 11.4%). The most common grade >= 3 adverse events were anemia (25.5 vs 30.7%), thrombocytopenia (24.2 vs 22.2%) and neutropenia (7.6 vs 12.4%) with carfilzomib vs control. Median OS for single-agent carfilzomib was similar to that for an active doublet control regimen in heavily pretreated RRMM patients.

NA

Although 90–95% of adults recover completely from Hepatitis B (HBV) infection, a minority are unable to clear the virus.[1][1] Epidemiological studies have demonstrated an increased risk of B-NHL among those with persistent HBV and B-NHL.[2][2]–[5][3] However, the roles of exposure per se

Purpose Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) has no standard of care for patients who are relapsed or refractory to autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). This phase II study examined safety and activity of panobinostat in this population. Patients and Methods Panobinostat 40 mg was administered orally three times per week. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) based on investigator assessment of radiologic imaging. Secondary end points included ORR by independent central review, time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Exploratory biomarker analyses were performed. Results The 129 treated patients (median age, 32 years; range, 18 to 75 years) were heavily pretreated with a median of four (range, two to seven) prior systemic regimens, and 41% did not respond to the regimen immediately preceding panobinostat. Tumor reductions occurred in 96 patients (74%). Objective response was achieved by 35 patients (27%), including 30 (23%) partial responses and five (4%) complete responses. The median TTR was 2.3 months, median DOR was 6.9 months, and median PFS was 6.1 months. The estimated 1-year overall survival rate was 78%. Common nonhematologic adverse events (AEs)—diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue—were generally grade 1 and 2. Most common grade 3 and 4 hematologic AEs—thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia—were manageable. Early reductions in thymus and activation-regulated chemokine were observed in patients achieving complete or partial response. Conclusion In the largest, prospective, multicenter, international trial conducted in heavily pretreated patients with HL who relapsed or were refractory to ASCT, panobinostat monotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity, resulting in durable responses.