Search

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest related to this work.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the validity of consumer grade step counter devices during the early recovery period after knee replacement surgery., Methods: Twenty-three participants wore a Fitbit Charge or Apple Watch Series 4 smart watch and performed a walking test along a 50-metre hallway. There were 9 males and 14 females included in the study with an average age of 68.5 years and BMI of 32. Each patient wore both the Fitbit Charge and Apple Watch while completing the walking test and an observer counted the ground truth value using a thumb-push tally counter. This test was repeated pre-operatively with no gait aid, immediately post operatively with a walker, at 6 weeks follow up with a cane and at 6 months with no gait aid. Bland-Altman plots were performed for all walking tests to compare the agreement between measurement techniques., Results: Mean overall agreement of step count for pre-operative and at 6 months for subjects walking without gait aids was excellent for both the Apple Watch vs. actual and Fitbit vs. actual with bias values ranging from - 0.87 to 1.36 with limits of agreement (LOA) ranging between - 10.82 and 15.91. While using a walker both devices showed extremely little agreement with the actual step count with bias values between 22.5 and 24.37 with LOA between 11.7 and 33.3. At 6 weeks post-op while using a cane, both the Apple Watch and Fitbit devices had a range of bias values between - 2.8 and 5.73 with LOA between - 13.51 and 24.97., Conclusions: These devices show poor validity in the early post operative setting, especially with the use of gait aids, and therefore results should be interpreted with caution., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: One of the most important challenges faced by orthopedic surgeons is periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). PJI is a common cause for total joint arthroplasty failure with an incidence of 0.3-1.9%. PJI can be devastating for the patient and extremely costly for the healthcare system. There is concern that a major cause of PJI is intra-operative colonization and recent studies have shown a decrease in PJI with the use of dilute povidone-iodine (Betadine ® , Avrio Health L.P, Stamford, CT) irrigation prior to wound closure. This study presents our experience with the use of dilute Betadine ® irrigation prior to wound closure and its effect on our post-operative hip and knee arthroplasty acute infection rate., Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart review performed at our hospital looking at PJI amongst patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2013 and 2017 comparing different irrigation methods (n = 3232). The study group (n = 1207) underwent irrigation prior to wound closure with dilute Betadine for 3 min and the control group (n = 1511) underwent irrigation using normal saline (NS)., Results: Using a logistic regression model where the following variables were adjusted for; ASA, age, sex, foley insertion, surgical duration and diabetes mellitus status a statistical significant reduction was seen in any infection (OR 0.45 [0.22; 0.89], p value < 0.05) and SSI (OR 0.30 [0.13; 0.70], p value 0.01) with the Betadine group. No significant reduction was seen with deep infections with the Betadine group compared to the NS group., Conclusion: PJI is a devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty and we found Betadine compared to NS irrigation provides an inexpensive and simple method to lower any PJI and more specifically SSI in THA and TKA., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2022. Crown.)

Background: We implemented a streamlined care pathway for patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal (TSA) pituitary surgery. Select patients are recovered in the postanesthesia care unit and transferred to a step-down unit for intermediate neurologic care (INCU), with clinicians trained to manage cerebrospinal fluid leak, diabetes insipidus (DI), and other complications., Methods: We evaluated all TSA surgeries performed at 1 academic medical center from 7 th January, 2017 to 30 th March, 2020, collecting patient factors, tumor characteristics, cost variables, and outcomes. The INCU pathway was implemented on 7 th January 2018. Pathway patients were compared with nonpathway patients across the study period. Outcomes were assessed using multivariate regression, adjusting for patient and surgical characteristics, including intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, postoperative DI, and tumor dimensions., Results: One hundred eighty-seven patients were identified. Seventy-nine were on the INCU pathway. Mean age was 53.5 years. Most patients were male (66%), privately insured (62%), and white (66%). Mean total cost of admission was $27,276. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 3.97 days. Use of the INCU pathway was associated with total cost reduction of $6376.33 (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: $3698.21-$9054.45) and LOS reduction by 1.27 days (P = 0.008, 95% CI: 0.33-2.20). In-hospital costs were reduced across all domains, including $1964.87 in variable direct labor costs (P < 0.001, 95% CI: $1142.08-$2787.64) and $1206.52 in variable direct supply costs (P < 0.001, 95% CI: $762.54-$1650.51). Pathway patients were discharged earlier despite a higher rate of postoperative DI (25% vs. 11%, P = 0.011), with fewer readmissions (0% vs. 6%, P = 0.021)., Conclusions: A streamlined care pathway following TSA surgery can reduce in-hospital costs and LOS without compromising patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Gender is a known social determinant of health (SDOH) that has been linked to neurosurgical outcome disparities. To improve quality of care, there exists a need to investigate the impact of gender on procedure-specific outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the role of gender on short- and long-term outcomes following resection of meningiomas - the most common benign brain neoplasm of adulthood - between exact matched patient cohorts., Material and Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma resection (n = 349) at a single, university-wide health system over a 6-year period were analyzed retrospectively. Coarsened exact matching was employed to match patients on numerous key characteristics related to outcomes. Primary outcomes included readmission, ED visit, reoperation, and mortality within 30 and 90 days of surgery. Mortality and reoperation were also assessed during the entire follow-up period. Outcomes were compared between matched female and male cohorts., Results: Between matched cohorts, no significant difference was observed in morbidity or mortality at 30 days ( p =  0.42-0.75), 90-days ( p =  0.23-0.69), or throughout the follow-up period ( p =  0.22-0.45). Differences in short-term mortality could not be assessed due to the low number of mortality events., Conclusions: After matching on characteristics known to impact outcomes and when isolated from other SDOHs, gender does not independently affect morbidity and mortality following meningioma resection. Further research on the role of other SDOHs in this population is merited to better understand underlying drivers of disparity.

Objective: To model the financial impact of policies governing the scheduling of overlapping surgeries, and to identify optimal solutions that maximize operating efficiency that satisfy the fiduciary duty to patients., Background: Hospitals depend on procedural revenue to maintain financial health as the recent pandemic has revealed. Proposed policies governing the scheduling of overlapping surgeries may dramatically impact hospital revenue. To date, the potential financial impact has not been modeled., Methods: A linear forecasting model based on a logic matrix decision tree enabled an analysis of surgeon productivity annualized over a fiscal year. The model applies procedural and operational variables to policy constraints limiting surgical scheduling. Model outputs included case and financial metrics modeled over 1000-surgeon-year simulations. case metrics included annual case volume, case mix, operating room (OR) utilization, surgeon utilization, idle time, and staff overtime hours. Financial outputs included annual revenue, expenses, and contribution margin., Results: The model was validated against surgical data. case and financial metrics decreased as a function of increasingly restrictive scheduling scenarios, with the greatest contribution margin loses ($1,650,000 per surgeon-year) realized with the introduction of policies mandating that a second patient could not enter the OR until the critical portion of the first surgery was completed. We identify an optimal scheduling scenario that maximizes surgeon efficiency, minimizes OR idle time and revenue loses, and satisfies ethical obligations to patients., Conclusions: Hospitals may expect significant financial loses with the introduction of policies restricting OR scheduling. We identify an optimal solution that maximizes efficiency while satisfying ethical duty to patients. This forecast is immediately relevant to any hospital system that depends upon procedural revenue., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction By identifying drivers of healthcare disparities, providers can better support high-risk patients and develop risk-mitigation strategies. Household income is a social determinant of health known to contribute to healthcare disparities. The present study evaluates the impact of household income on short-term morbidity and mortality following supratentorial meningioma resection. Methods A total of 349 consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma resection over a six-year period (2013-2019) were analyzed retrospectively. Primary outcomes were unplanned hospital readmission, reoperations, emergency department (ED) visits, return to the operating room, and all-cause mortality within 30 days of the index operation. Standardized univariate regression was performed across the entire sample to assess the impact of household income on outcomes. Subsequently, outcomes were compared between the lowest (household income ≤ $51,780) and highest (household income ≥ $87,958) income quartiles. Finally, stepwise regression was executed to identify potential confounding variables. Results Across all supratentorial meningioma resection patients, lower household income was correlated with a significantly increased rate of 30-day ED visits (p = 0.002). Comparing the lowest and highest income quartiles, the lowest quartile was similarly observed to have a significantly higher rate of 30-day ED evaluation (p = 0.033). Stepwise regression revealed that the observed association between household income and 30-day ED visits was not affected by confounding variables. Conclusion This study suggests that household income plays a role in short-term ED evaluation following supratentorial meningioma resection., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Spadola et al.)

Purpose: Gender is a known social determinant of health which has been linked disparities in medical care. This study intends to assess the impact of gender on 90-day and long-term morbidity and mortality outcomes following supratentorial brain tumor resection in a coarsened-exact matched population., Materials and Methods: A total of 1970 consecutive patients at a single, university-wide health system undergoing supratentorial brain tumor resection over a six-year period (09 June 2013 to 26 April 2019) were analyzed retrospectively. Coarsened Exact Matching was employed to match patients on key demographic factors including history of prior surgery, smoking status, median household income, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), amongst others. Primary outcomes assessed included readmission, ED visit, unplanned reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of surgery. Long-term outcomes such as mortality and unplanned return to surgery during the entire follow-up period were also recorded., Results: Whole-population regression demonstrated significantly increased mortality throughout the entire follow-up period for the male cohort ( p  = 0.004, OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.09 - 1.59); however, no significant difference was found after coarsened exact matching was performed ( p  = 0.08). In both the whole-population regression and matched-cohort analysis, no significant difference was observed between gender and readmission, ED visit, unplanned reoperation, or mortality in the 90-day post-operative window, in addition to return to surgery after throughout the entire follow-up period., Conclusion: After controlling for confounding variables, female birth gender did not significantly predict any difference in morbidity and mortality outcomes following supratentorial brain tumor resection. Difference between mortality outcomes in the pre-matched population versus the matched cohort suggests the need to better manage the underlying health conditions of male patients in order to prevent future disparities.

Purpose: It is well documented that the interaction between many social factors can affect clinical outcomes. However, the independent effects of economics on outcomes following surgery are not well understood. The goal of this study is to investigate the role socioeconomic status has on postoperative outcomes in a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection population., Materials and Methods: Over 6 years (07 June 2013 to 24 April 2019), 277 consecutive CPA tumor cases were reviewed at a single, multihospital academic medical center. Patient characteristics obtained included median household income, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), race, BMI, tobacco use, amongst 23 others. Outcomes studied included readmission, ED evaluation, unplanned return to surgery (during and after index admission), return to surgery after index admission, and mortality within 90 days, in addition to reoperation and mortality throughout the entire follow-up period. Univariate analysis was conducted amongst the entire population with significance set at a p value <0.05. The population was divided into quartiles based on median household income and univariate analysis conducted between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles, with significance set at a p value <0.05. Stepwise regression was conducted to determine the correlations amongst study variables and identify confounding factors., Results: Regression analysis of 273 patients did not find household income to be associated with any of the long-term outcomes assessed. Similarly, a Q1 vs Q4 comparison did not yield significantly different odds of outcomes assessed., Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, the odds ratios suggest socioeconomic status may have a clinically significant effect on postsurgical outcomes. Further studies in larger, matched populations are necessary to validate these findings.

Endoscopic fenestration is best as it is minimally invasive and does not require hardware in the surgical site (Figure 1). This case shows the safety of endoscopic fenestration and the utility of operative adjuncts ( J Korean Med Sci . 1999;14:443; Neurosurg Focus . 2005;19:E7)., Competing Interests: The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the materials or devices described in the video., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction The analysis of social determinants of health (SDOH) across different surgical populations is critical for the identification of health disparities and the development risk mitigation strategies among vulnerable patients. Research into the impact of gender on neurosurgical outcomes remains limited. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of gender on outcomes, in a matched sample, following posterior fossa tumor resection, a high-risk neurosurgical procedure. Methods Two hundred seventy-eight consecutive patients undergoing posterior fossa tumor resection over a six-year period (June 07, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a single academic medical system were retrospectively evaluated. Short-term outcomes included 30- and 90-day rates of emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Long-term outcomes included mortality and reoperation for the duration of follow-up. Firstly, male and female patients in the entire pre-match sample were compared. Thereafter, coarsened exact matching was employed to control for confounding variables, matching male and female patients on key demographic factors - including history of prior surgery, median household income, and race, amongst others - and outcome comparison was repeated. Results In both the entire pre-match sample and matched cohort analyses, no significant differences in adverse postsurgical events were discerned between the female and male patients when evaluating 30-day or 90-day rates of ED visit, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. There were also no differences in reoperation or mortality for the duration of follow-up. Conclusion Gender does not appear to impact short- or long-term outcomes following posterior fossa tumor resection. As such, risk assessment and mitigation strategies in this population should focus on other SDOH. Further studies should assess the role of other SDOH within this population., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2021, Farooqi et al.)

Background: Clinical practice in postoperative bracing after posterior lumbar spine fusion (PLF) is inconsistent between providers. This paper attempts to assess the effect of bracing on short-term outcomes related to safety, quality of care, and direct costs., Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients undergoing multilevel PLF with or without bracing (2013-2017) was undertaken (n = 980). Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed. Outcomes assessed included length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), surgical-site infection (SSI), total cost, readmission within 30 days, and emergency department (ED) evaluation within 30 days., Results: Amongst the study population, 936 were braced and 44 were not braced. There was no difference between the braced and unbraced cohorts regarding LOS ( P = .106), discharge disposition ( P = .898), 30-day readmission ( P = .434), and 30-day ED evaluation ( P = 1.000). There was also no difference in total cost ( P = .230) or QALY gain ( P = .740). The results indicate a significantly lower likelihood of SSI in the braced population (1.50% versus 6.82%, odds ratio = 0.208, 95% confidence interval = 0.057-0.751, P = .037). There was no difference in relevant comorbidities ( P = .259-1.000), although the braced cohort was older than the unbraced cohort (63 versus 56 y, P = .003)., Conclusion: Bracing following multilevel posterior lumbar fixation does not alter short-term postoperative course or reduce the risk for early adverse events. Cost analysis show no difference in direct costs between the 2 treatment approaches. Short-term data suggest that removal of bracing from the postoperative regimen for PLF will not result in increased adverse outcomes., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2021 ISASS.)

Introduction: The LACE+ index has been shown to predict readmissions; however, LACE+ has not been validated for extended postoperative outcomes in an orthopedic surgery population. The purpose of this study is to examine whether LACE+ scores predict unplanned readmissions and adverse outcomes following orthopedic surgery. Use of the LACE1 index to proactively identify at-risk patients may enable actions to reduce preventable readmissions., Methods: LACE+ scores were retrospectively calculated at the time of discharge for all consecutive orthopedic surgery patients (n = 18,893) at a multicenter health system over 3 years (2016-2018). Coarsened exact matching was used to match patients based on characteristics not assessed in the LACE+ index. Outcome differences between matched patients in different LACE quartiles (i.e. Q4 vs. Q3, Q2, and Q1) were analyzed., Results: Higher LACE+ scores significantly predicted readmission and emergency department visits within 90 days of discharge and for 30-90 days after discharge for all studied quartiles. Higher LACE+ scores also significantly predicted reoperations, but only between Q4 and Q3 quartiles., Conclusions: The results suggest that the LACE+ risk-prediction tool may accurately predict patients with a high likelihood of adverse outcomes after a broad array of orthopedic procedures., Competing Interests: N. R. Malhotra receives funding from The Bernadette and Kevin McKenna Family Research Fund. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 National Association for Healthcare Quality.)

Surgeon providers and billing professionals use Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to specify patient treatment and associated charges. In the present study, coding discrepancies between surgeons' first pass coding and employed coders' final codes were investigated. A total of 500 patients over 3 months were retrospectively analyzed for coding discrepancies. To quantify the impact of change, codes with the most accumulated discrepancies were studied and change to annual relative value unit (RVU) was determined. Final submission of codes to billing demonstrated a 161% increase in total codes by the professional coders, versus original surgeon-derived codes (1594 vs 987 CPT codes). The most common source of change between the surgeon and coder was the addition of distinct codes by the billing professional (270 patients, 54.51%). These results demonstrate the existence of coding discrepancies. Future investigation will evaluate the communication between surgeons and billing professionals., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chordomas present challenges for en bloc surgical resection, which optimally reduces local recurrence and increases patient survival. Navigated ultrasonic osteotomy, also known as piezosurgery, provides a distinct advantage for achieving negative margins after en bloc resection., Methods: Eight consecutive patients with chordomas (2 cervical, 3 lumbar, and 3 sacral) treated with navigated ultrasonic osteotomy to achieve en bloc resection were identified from our institutional spine tumor database (2016-2019) and retrospectively reviewed., Results: En bloc resection, with negative margins, was achieved in all cases. Two patients (25%) were women, and mean age at surgery was 44 ± 11 years. Median estimated blood loss was 1000 mL (interquartile range: 263-1500 mL). Median length of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range: 3-19.5 days). Two patients required a revision procedure. Two patients had complications requiring readmission within the 30-day postoperative window. Mean duration of follow-up for the cohort was 900 ± 554 days., Conclusions: Navigated ultrasonic osteotomy is an effective surgical technique to achieve en bloc resection of chordomas with negative margins and disease-free survival. To date, this represents the first reported cohort of patients undergoing the procedure as described here. Future studies should include larger sample sizes for more robust clinical outcome data to further elucidate the benefits of piezosurgery for obtaining en bloc chordoma resection., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We illustrate the microsurgical resection of a giant lumbar spinal schwannoma in a 37-yr-old male who presented with worsening low back pain, weakness, and numbness and tingling in the bilateral legs and feet. Lumbar spine imaging demonstrated a large, heterogeneously enhancing intradural mass with notable bony erosion. Given the thinning of the pedicles, large tumor size, and bony remodeling, instrumentation was performed in addition to decompression, with direct stimulation-triggered electromyography and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. This video demonstrates the surgical technique for resection and accompanied reconstruction necessary for the management of these giant intradural lesions. Postoperatively, the patient had no complications, with improvement of neurological symptoms at follow-up. Though improved, the patient had some residual numbness at postoperative follow-up visit. The patient consented to the procedure. This video was deemed Institutional Review Board (IRB) exempt by the University of Pennsylvania IRB, as it is considered a case report, which does not require IRB approval or patient consent., (© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.)

The relationship between social determinants of health (SDOH) and neurosurgical outcomes has become increasingly relevant. To date, results of prior work evaluating the impact of social determinants in neurosurgery have been mixed, and the need for robust data on this subject remains. The present review evaluates how gender, race, and socioeconomic status (SES) influence outcomes following various brain tumor resection procedures. Results from a number of prior studies from the senior author's lab are summarized, with all data acquired using the EpiLog tool (Epilog Laser). Separate analyses were performed for each procedure, evaluating the unique, isolated impact of gender, race, and SES on outcomes. A comprehensive literature review identified any prior studies evaluating the influence of these SDOH on neurosurgical outcomes. The review presented herein suggests that the effect of gender and race on outcomes is largely mitigated when equal access to care is attained, and socioeconomic factors and comorbidities are controlled for. Furthermore, when patients are matched upon for a number of clinically relevant covariates, SES impacts postoperative mortality. Elucidation of this disparity empowers surgeons to initiate actionable change to equilibrate future outcomes., (© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.)

Objective: To characterize the patient and clinical factors that determine variability in hospital costs following endoscopic transphenoidal pituitary surgery., Methods: All endoscopic transphenoidal pituitary surgeries performed from January 1, 2015, to October 24, 2017, with complete data were evaluated in this retrospective single-institution study. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables during each hospital stay. Multivariate linear regression was performed using Stata software., Results: The analysis included 190 patients and average length of stay was 4.71 days. Average total in-hospital cost was $28,624 (95% confidence interval $25,094-$32,155) with average total direct cost of $19,444 ($17,136-$21,752) and total indirect cost of $9181 ($7592-$10,409). On multivariate regression, post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was associated with a significant increase in all cost variables, including a total cost increase of $40,981 ($15,474-$66,489, P = .002). Current smoking status was associated with an increased total cost of $20,189 ($6,638-$33,740, P = .004). Self-reported Caucasian ethnicity was associated with a significant decrease in total cost of $6646 (-$12,760 to -$532, P = .033). Post-operative DI was associated with increased costs across all variables that were not statistically significant., Conclusions: Post-operative CSF leak, current smoking status, and non-Caucasian ethnicity were associated with significantly increased costs. Understanding of cost drivers of endoscopic transphenoidal pituitary surgery is critical for future cost control and value creation initiatives., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:760-764, 2021., (© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).)

Objective: To assess the influence of race on short-term patient outcomes in a pituitary tumor surgery population., Patients and Methods: Coarsened exact matching was used to retrospectively analyze consecutive patients (n = 567) undergoing pituitary tumor resection over a six-year period (June 07, 2013 to April 29, 2019) at a single, multi-hospital academic medical center. Black/African American and white patients were exact matched based on twenty-nine (29) patient, procedure, and hospital characteristics. Matching characteristics included surgical costs, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, duration of surgery, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, amongst others. Outcomes studied included unplanned 90-day readmission, emergency room (ER) evaluation, and unplanned reoperation., Results: Ninety-two (n = 92) patients were exact matched and analyzed. There was no significant difference in 90-day readmission (p = 0.267, OR (black/AA vs white) = 0.500, 95% CI = 0.131-1.653) or ER evaluation within 90 days (p = 0.092, OR = 3.000, 95% CI = 0.848-13.737) between the two cohorts. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rate of unplanned reoperation throughout the duration of the follow up period between matched black/African American and white patients (p = 0.607, OR = 0.750, 95% CI = 0.243-2.211)., Conclusion: This study suggests that the effect of race on post-operative outcomes is largely mitigated when equal access is attained, and when race is effectively isolated from socioeconomic factors and comorbidities in a population undergoing pituitary tumor resection., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives  The objective of this study is to elucidate the impact of income on short-term outcomes in a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection population. Design  This is a retrospective regression analysis. Setting  This study was done at a single, multihospital, urban academic medical center. Participants  Over 6 years (from June 7, 2013, to April 24, 2019), 277 consecutive CPA tumor cases were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures  Outcomes studied included readmission, emergency department evaluation, unplanned return to surgery, return to surgery after index admission, and mortality. Univariate analysis was conducted among the entire population with significance set at a p -value <0.05. The population was divided into quartiles based on median household income and univariate analysis conducted between the lowest (quartile 1 [Q1]) and highest (quartile 4 [Q4]) socioeconomic quartiles, with significance set at a p -value <0.05. Stepwise regression was conducted to determine the correlations among study variables and to identify confounding factors. Results  Regression analysis of 273 patients demonstrated decreased rates of unplanned reoperation ( p  = 0.015) and reoperation after index admission ( p  = 0.035) at 30 days with higher standardized income. Logistic regression between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles demonstrated decreased unplanned reoperation ( p  = 0.045) and decreasing but not significant reoperation after index admission ( p  = 0.15) for Q4 patients. No significant difference was observed for other metrics of morbidity and mortality. Conclusion  Higher socioeconomic status is associated with decreased risk of unplanned reoperation following CPA tumor resection., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Gender is a complex social determinant of health affected by both social and biological factors. There is a need to investigate the effect of gender on outcomes, in the absence of confounding characteristics, to mitigate disparities in care., Methods: A total of 1970 consecutive patients at a university health system undergoing nonmeningioma supratentorial brain tumor resection over a 6-year period (June 9, 2013-April 26, 2019) were analyzed retrospectively. Coarsened exact matching was used to match patients on demographic factors including history of previous surgery, median household income, and race. Outcomes assessed included readmission, emergency department visit, unplanned reoperation, and mortality within 30 days of surgery. Regression analysis was performed among a prematched population and between the matched cohorts with significance set at a P value <0.05., Results: Within the matched population, no significant difference was observed between male and female patients in any of the recorded outcomes after nonmeningioma supratentorial brain tumor resection, including readmission, emergency department evaluation, unplanned reoperation, and mortality within 30 days of resection (P = 0.28-0.85). Similarly, no significant difference was found in any of the morbidity and mortality outcomes in the prematched regression analysis (P = 0.10-0.70)., Conclusions: When gender is isolated from race, household economics, and other key factors, it does not seem to independently predict morbidity or mortality in the short-term postoperative window after supratentorial brain tumor resection. Future studies should investigate the impact of gender in longer follow-up and its interrelation with other social determinants of health contributing to outcome disparity., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The impact of household economics on outcomes is not well understood. We examined the relationship of income and surgical outcomes, after controlling for numerous patient characteristics., Methods: Consecutive adult (≥18) patients (n = 1970, June 2013-April 2019) undergoing supratentorial brain tumor resection, at a single health system, were assessed. Univariate logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of household income on patient survival. The cohort was then separated into income quartiles (range: $18,119-$193,152). The lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) income quartiles were then compared. Patients (Q1/Q4) subsequently underwent 1:1 coarsened exact matching based on a number of patient characteristics. Outcomes included mortality, emergency evaluations, and readmissions., Results: Regression analysis of all 1970 patients demonstrated increasing survival with increasing household income (mortality 30-day P = 0.027, 90-day P = 0.002). Logistic regression of all Q1 versus Q4 patients (n = 970) demonstrated increased survival for the highest income patients (Q4) (mortality 30-day P = 0.220, 90-day P = 0.028, all follow-up P = 0.027). Analysis of exact-matched patients (Q1 vs. Q4; n = 462), demonstrated higher income was associated with escalating, nonsignificant, survival rates at 30 (mortality 3.90% Q1 vs. 2.60% Q4, P = 0.424) and 90 days (mortality 13.42% Q1 vs. 8.66 Q4, P = 0.101) but significantly increased survival during total follow-up (mortality Q1 46.75%, Q4 35.06%, P = 0.010). No significant difference was noted for the remaining studied outcomes., Conclusions: Patients matched on a multitude of characteristics, of lesser household income, had higher long-term mortality after brain tumor resection. Further understanding of this disparity should be sought and differences mitigated., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives  The present study examines the effect of median household income on mid- and long-term outcomes in a posterior fossa brain tumor resection population. Design  This is a retrospective regression analysis. Setting  The study conducted at a single, multihospital, urban academic medical center. Participants  A total of 283 consecutive posterior fossa brain tumor cases, excluding cerebellar pontine angle tumors, over a 6-year period (June 09, 2013-April 26, 2019) was included in this analysis. Main Outcome Measures  Outcomes studied included 90-day readmission, 90-day emergency department evaluation, 90-day return to surgery, reoperation within 90 days after index admission, reoperation throughout the entire follow-up period, mortality within 90 days, and mortality throughout the entire follow-up period. Univariate analysis was conducted for the whole population and between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles. Stepwise regression was conducted to identify confounding variables. Results  Lower socioeconomic status was found to be correlated with increased mortality within 90 postoperative days and throughout the entire follow-up period. Similarly, analysis between the lowest and highest household income quartiles (Q1 vs. Q4) demonstrated Q4 to have significantly decreased mortality during total follow-up and a decreasing but not significant difference in 90-day mortality. No significant difference in morbidity was observed. Conclusion  This study suggests that lower household income is associated with increased mortality in both the 90-day window and total follow-up period. It is possible that there is an opportunity for health care providers to use socioeconomic status to proactively identify high-risk patients and provide additional resources in the postoperative setting., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The LACE+ index risk prediction tool has not been successfully used to predict short-term outcomes after neurosurgery. This study assessed the ability of LACE+ to predict 30-day (30D) adverse outcomes after supratentorial brain tumor surgery., Patients and Methods: LACE+ scores were retrospectively calculated for consecutive patients (n = 624) who received surgery for supratentorial tumors at one multi-center health system (2017-2019). Coarsened exact matching was employed to control for confounding variables. Outcomes including unplanned hospital readmission, emergency department visits, and death were compared for patients with different LACE+ score quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4)., Results: 134 patients were matched between Q1 and Q4; 152 patients between Q2 and Q4; 192 patients between Q3 and Q4. LACE+ score was not found to predict readmission within 30D of discharge for Q1 vs Q4 (p = 0.239), Q2 vs Q4 (p = 0.336), or Q3 vs Q4 (p = 0.739). LACE + score also did not predict 30D risk of emergency department visits for Q1 vs Q4 (p = 0.210), Q2 vs Q4 (p = 0.839), or Q3 vs Q4 (p = 0.167). LACE + did predict death within 30D of surgery for Q3 vs Q4 (1.04 % vs 7.29 %, p = 0.039), but not for Q1 vs Q4 (p = 0.625) or Q2 vs Q4 (p = 0.125)., Conclusion: LACE + may not be suitable for characterizing short-term risk of certain perioperative events in a patient population undergoing supratentorial brain tumor surgery., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

IDH-wildtype glioblastoma is a relatively common malignant brain tumor in adults. These patients generally have dismal prognoses, although outliers with long survival have been noted in the literature. Recently, it has been reported that many histologically lower-grade IDH-wildtype astrocytomas have a similar clinical outcome to grade IV tumors, suggesting they may represent early or undersampled glioblastomas. cIMPACT-NOW 3 guidelines now recommend upgrading IDH-wildtype astrocytomas with certain molecular criteria (EGFR amplifications, chromosome 7 gain/10 loss, and/or TERT promoter mutations), establishing the concept of a "molecular grade IV" astrocytoma. In this report, we apply these cIMPACT-NOW 3 criteria to 2 independent glioblastoma cohorts, totaling 393 public database and institutional glioblastoma cases: 89 cases without any of the cIMPACT-NOW 3 criteria (GBM-C0) and 304 cases with one or more criteria (GBM-C1-3). In the GBM-C0 groups, there was a trend toward longer recurrence-free survival (median 12-17 vs 6-10 months), significantly longer overall survival (median 32-41 vs 15-18 months), younger age at initial diagnosis, and lower overall mutation burden compared to the GBM-C1-3 cohorts. These data suggest that while histologic features may not be ideal indicators of patient survival in IDH-wildtype astrocytomas, these 3 molecular features may also be important prognostic factors in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma., (© 2020 American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study assesses the impact of Median Household Income (MHI) on short- and long-term morbidity and mortality following supratentorial meningioma resection., Patients and Methods: 351 consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma tumor resection, at a single health system over a six-year period (June 09, 2013 to April 26, 2019) were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes assessed included readmission, emergency department (ED) evaluation, and mortality within 90 days of surgery. Univariate regression analysis was conducted amongst the entire population. The population was then divided into quartiles based on median household income and univariate analysis was conducted between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) quartiles. Significance was set at a P-value < 0.05. Stepwise regression was performed to identify confounding variables in the logistic model., Results: In the whole population, lower Median Household Income correlated to a significant increase in ED evaluation within 90-days of supratentorial meningioma resection. No significant difference was noted between median household income and 90-day readmission, 90-day unplanned re-operation, return to surgery after index admission within 90-days, return to surgery during the duration of the follow-up period, mortality within 90-days, and mortality during the duration of the follow-up period. In addition, when comparing Q1 (MHI ≤ $51,780) and Q4 (MHI ≥ $87,958), similar results were noted with increased ED evaluation for patients with lower MHI, but no significant difference in other factors of morbidity or mortality., Conclusion: Following supratentorial meningioma resection, a lower median household income was significantly associated with increased emergency department visits within 90 post-operative days., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background Disparities exist in medical care and may result in avoidable negative clinical care outcomes for those affected. There remains a paucity in the literature regarding the impact of economic disparities on neurosurgical outcomes. Methods A total of 283 consecutive posterior fossa brain tumor resections, excluding cerebellopontine angle tumors, over a six-year period (June 07, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a single, multihospital academic medical center were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes evaluated included 30-day readmission and mortality, emergency department (ED) evaluation, unplanned return to surgery within 30 days, and return to surgery after index admission within 30 days. The population was divided into quartiles based on median household income, and univariate analysis was conducted between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles, with significance set at a p < 0.05. Stepwise regression was conducted to determine the correlations among study variables and identify confounding factors. Results Whole population univariate analysis demonstrated lower socioeconomic status (SES) to be correlated with increased mortality within 30 post-operative days and increased return to surgery after index admission. No significant difference was found with regard to 30-day readmission, ED evaluation, unplanned reoperation, or return to surgery after index admission. Decreasing, but not significant, mortality was demonstrated between Q1 and Q4 socioeconomic quartiles. Conclusions This study suggests that low SES, when defined by household income, correlates with increased mortality within 30 days and an increased need for return to surgery within 30 days. There may be an opportunity for hospitals and care providers to use SES to proactively identify high-risk patients and test the impact of supports in the post-operative setting., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2020, Blue et al.)

Background: The relationship between race and neurosurgical outcomes is poorly characterized despite its importance. The influence of race on short-term patient outcomes in a pituitary tumor surgery population was assessed., Methods: Coarsened exact matching was used to retrospectively analyze 567 consecutive pituitary tumor cases from a 6-year period (June 7, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a single, multihospital academic medical center. Outcomes studied included 30-day readmission, mortality, and reoperation., Results: There were 92 exact-matched cases suitable for analysis. There was a significant difference in 30-day emergency department visits between the 2 races (black/African American vs. white odds ratio = 4.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.072-30.559, P = 0.0386). There was no observed mortality over the 30-day postoperative period. There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between the 2 race cohorts (P = 0.3877), in return to surgery after index admission within 30 days (P = 1.000), or in return to surgery within 30 days (P = 0.3750)., Conclusions: This study suggests that the effect of race on outcomes is partly mitigated for individuals who can attain access, and when socioeconomic factors and comorbidities are controlled for. The noted significant difference in emergency department visits could be indicative of confounding variables that were not well controlled for and requires further exploration., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To explore the effect of overlapping surgery on the risk of adverse outcomes in urologic surgery., Methods: Coarsened exact matching was used to assess the impact of overlap on outcomes among urologic surgical interventions (n = 4853) over 2 years (2013-2015) at 1 health system. Overlap was categorized as any overlap, beginning overlap or end overlap. Study subjects were matched 1:1 on 11 clinically relevant variables. Serious unanticipated events were studied., Results: Four hundred and thirty-four patients had any overlap and were matched (n = 575, a 75.47% match rate). For beginning/end overlap, matched groups were created (n = 108/83 patients, match rate was 83.07/75.45%, respectively). Among matched patients, any overlap did not predict unanticipated return to surgery at 30 or 90 days. Any overlap predicted neither reoperation, readmission, or ER visits at 30 or 90 days. Overlap patients showed no difference in mortality during follow-up. Beginning/end overlap had a similar lack of association with serious unanticipated events., Conclusion: Nonconcurrent overlapping surgery is not associated with adverse outcomes in a large, matched urologic surgery population across 1 academic health system., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Purpose: We assessed the validity of postsurgery venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnoses identified from administrative databases and compared Bayesian and multiple imputation (MI) approaches in correcting for outcome misclassification in logistic regression models., Methods: Sensitivity and specificity of postsurgery VTE among patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement (THR/TKR) were assessed against chart review in six Montreal hospitals in 2009 to 2010. Administrative data on all THR/TKR Quebec patients in 2009 to 2010 were obtained. The performance of Bayesian external, Bayesian internal, and MI approaches to correct the odds ratio (OR) of postsurgery VTE in tertiary versus community hospitals was assessed using simulations. Bayesian external approach used prior information from external sources, while Bayesian internal and MI approaches used chart review., Results: In total, 17 319 patients were included, 2136 in participating hospitals, among whom 75 had VTE in administrative data versus 81 in chart review. VTE sensitivity was 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.69) and specificity was 0.99 (0.98-0.99), overall. The adjusted OR of VTE in tertiary versus community hospitals was 1.35 (1.12-1.64) using administrative data, 1.45 (0.97-2.19) when MI was used for misclassification correction, and 1.53 (0.83-2.87) and 1.57 (0.39-5.24) when Bayesian internal and external approaches were used, respectively. In simulations, all three approaches reduced the OR bias and had appropriate coverage for both nondifferential and differential misclassification., Conclusion: VTE identified from administrative data had low sensitivity and high specificity. The Bayesian external approach was useful to reduce outcome misclassification bias in logistic regression; however, it required accurate specification of the misclassification properties and should be used with caution., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background and Introduction: Telerehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is supported by strong evidence on the effectiveness of such intervention and from a cost-benefit point of view. Satisfaction of patients toward in-home telerehabilitation after TKA has not yet been examined thoroughly in large-scale clinical trials. This study aims to compare satisfaction level of patients following in-home telerehabilitation (TELE) after TKA to one of the patients following a usual face-to-face home visit (STD) rehabilitation. Secondarily, to determine if any clinical or personal variables were associated to the level of satisfaction., Materials and Methods: This study was embedded in a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 205 patients randomized into two groups. Rehabilitation intervention was the same for both groups; only approach for service delivery differed (telerehabilitation or home visits). Participants were assessed at baseline (before TKA), at hospital discharge, and at 2 and 4 months postdischarge (E4) using functional outcomes. Patient satisfaction was measured using the validated Health Care Satisfaction Questionnaire (HCSQ) at E4., Results: Characteristics of all participants were similar at baseline. Satisfaction level of both groups did not differ and was very high (over 85%). It was neither correlated to personal characteristics nor to improvements of functional level from preoperative to E4. Satisfaction was rather found associated to walking and stair-climbing performances., Conclusions: These results, in conjunction with evidences of clinical effectiveness and cost benefits demonstrated in the same sample of patients, strongly support the use of telerehabilitation to improve access to rehabilitation services and efficiency of service delivery after TKA.

Background: Audio/video-mediated communication between patients and clinicians using videoconferencing over telecommunication networks is a key component of providing teletreatments in rehabilitation., Objective: The objectives of this study were to (1) document the conditions of use, performance, and reliability of videoconferencing-based communication in the context of in-home teletreatment (TELE) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and (2) assess from the perspective of the providers, the quality attributes of the technology used and its impact on clinical objectives., Materials and Methods: Descriptive embedded study in a randomized controlled trial using a sample of 97 post-TKA patients, who received a total of 1,431 TELE sessions. Technical support use, service delivery reliability, performance, and use of network connection were assessed using self-report data from a costing grid and automated logs captured from videoconferencing systems. Physical therapists assessed the quality and impact of video-mediated communications after each TELE session on seven attributes., Results: Installation of a new Internet connection was required in 75% of the participants and average technician's time to install test and uninstall technology (including travel time) was 308.4 min. The reliability of service delivery was 96.5% of planned sessions with 21% of TELE session requiring a reconnection during the session. Remote technical support was solicited in 43% of the sessions (interventions were less than 3-min duration). Perceived technological impacts on video-mediated communications were minimal with quality of the overall technical environment evaluated as good or acceptable in 96% of the sessions and clinical objectives reached almost completely or completely in 99% of the sessions., Conclusions: In-home rehabilitation teletreatments can be delivered reliably but requires access to technical support for the initial setup and maintenance. Optimization of the processes of reliably connecting patients to the Internet, getting the telerehabilitation platform in the patient's home, installing, configuring, and testing will be needed to generalize this approach of service delivery.

Background: The availability of less resource-intensive alternatives to home visits for rehabilitation following orthopaedic surgeries is important, given the increasing need for home care services and the shortage of health resources. The goal of this trial was to determine whether an in-home telerehabilitation program is not clinically inferior to a face-to-face home visit approach (standard care) after hospital discharge of patients following a total knee arthroplasty., Methods: Two hundred and five patients who had a total knee arthroplasty were randomized before hospital discharge to the telerehabilitation group or the face-to-face home visit group. Both groups received the same rehabilitation intervention for two months after hospital discharge. Patients were evaluated at baseline (before total knee arthroplasty), immediately after the rehabilitation intervention (two months after discharge), and two months later (four months after discharge). The primary outcome measure was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire at the last follow-up evaluation. Secondary outcome measures included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire, functional and strength tests, and knee range of motion. The noninferiority margin was set at 9% for the WOMAC., Results: The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients were similar at baseline. At the last follow-up evaluation, the mean differences between the groups with regard to the WOMAC gains, adjusted for baseline values, were near zero (for 182 patients in the per-protocol analysis): -1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.6%, 2.3%) for the total score, -1.6% (95% CI: -5.9%, 2.8%) for pain, -0.7% (95% CI: -6.8%, 5.4%) for stiffness, and -1.8% (95% CI: -5.9%, 2.3%) for function. The confidence intervals were all within the predetermined zone of noninferiority. The secondary outcomes had similar results, as did the intention-to-treat analysis, which was conducted afterward for 198 patients., Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the noninferiority of in-home telerehabilitation and support its use as an effective alternative to face-to-face service delivery after hospital discharge of patients following a total knee arthroplasty., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., (Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Rehabilitation provided through home visits is part of the continuum of care after discharge from hospital following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As demands for rehabilitation at home are growing and becoming more difficult to meet, in-home telerehabilitation has been proposed as an alternate service delivery method. However, there is a need for robust data concerning both the effectiveness and the cost of dispensing in-home telerehabilitation., Objective: The objective of this study was to document, analyze, and compare real costs of two service delivery methods: in-home telerehabilitation and conventional home visits., Methods: The economic analysis was conducted as part of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) on telerehabilitation for TKA, and involved data from 197 patients, post-TKA. Twice a week for 8 weeks, participants received supervised physiotherapy via two delivery methods, depending on their study group allocation: in-home telerehabilitation (TELE) and home-visit rehabilitation (VISIT). Patients were recruited from eight hospitals in the province of Quebec, Canada. The TELE group intervention was delivered by videoconferencing over high-speed Internet. The VISIT group received the same intervention at home. Costs related to the delivery of the two services (TELE and VISIT) were calculated. Student's t tests were used to compare costs per treatment between the two groups. To take distance into account, the two treatment groups were compared within distance strata using two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs)., Results: The mean cost of a single session was Can $93.08 for the VISIT group (SD $35.70) and $80.99 for the TELE group (SD $26.60). When comparing both groups, real total cost analysis showed a cost differential in favor of the TELE group (TELE minus VISIT: -$263, 95% CI -$382 to -$143). However, when the patient's home was located less than 30 km round-trip from the health care center, the difference in costs between TELE and VISIT treatments was not significant (P=.25, .26, and .11 for the <10, 10-19, and 20-29 km strata, respectively). The cost of TELE treatments was lower than VISIT treatments when the distance was 30 km or more (30-49 km: $81<$103, P=.002; ≥50 km: $90<$152, P<.001)., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study of the actual costs of in-home telerehabilitation covering all subcosts of telerehabilitation and distance between the health care center and the patient's home. The cost for a single session of in-home telerehabilitation compared to conventional home-visit rehabilitation was lower or about the same, depending on the distance between the patient's home and health care center. Under the controlled conditions of an RCT, a favorable cost differential was observed when the patient was more than 30 km from the provider. Stakeholders and program planners can use these data to guide decisions regarding introducing telerehabilitation as a new service in their clinic., Trial Registration: International Standard Registered Clinical Study Number (ISRCTN): 66285945; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN66285945 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6WlT2nuX4).