Search

This review article traces the immunohistochemistry ancestry of cytotoxins as antibodies. The immunohistochemistry success, as a diagnostic and research test, stood on the shoulders of negative and positive experimentation results with cytotoxins from the first half of the twentieth century. This is when experimental immunologists came with the understanding of the need for both antigen and antibody purification to achieve specificity of the immunological reaction. Simultaneously, protocols were developed, which involved injecting antigenic material into experimental animals. During this time, reliable methods for evaluation of antiserum strength or titer were established. The evolution of antigen preparation for immunofluorescence is presented here as one of the transitional steps to modern immunohistochemistry. This work paved the way for the development of the monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies methodology. The article is written from the author's perspective as an experimental immunologist and a hands-on participant during many steps of development in modern morphological laboratory diagnostics. Knowledge of the roots of immunohistochemistry is useful for laboratory professionals in appreciation of predecessors' contributions. Familiarity with history of experimental immunology would be beneficial for understanding the methodological principles of their current work as well as future development prospects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To describe the perspective of grossing technology and highlight the prospective of its development in histology laboratory. Methods Analysis of different components of grossing technology. Results Increased requirements for a specimen's turnaround time and the advancements in modern processing equipment make the triage of workflow a significant part of a grossing person's responsibilities. The implementation of digital pathology in morphology studies practice requires standardization of fixation, the thickness of gross section, and optimal embedding orientation. To meet tomorrow's challenges, grossing technology should work on embedding automation and gross digital pathology to record gross sections corresponding the microscope slide. Specialization of grossing stations might be beneficial to the quality of processing and smooth workflow productivity. The emerging grossing technologist subspecialty requires development of a special training program. Conclusion Grossing technology can contribute to new challenges in modern histology laboratory, assuring high-quality microscope slides for the pathologist's diagnosis and research evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor and a reply are presented in response to the article "Principles and Controversies in CPT Coding in Surgical Pathology."