Search

The impact of albumin use during major surgery is unknown, and a dearth of evidence governing its use in major non-cardiac surgery has long precluded its standardization in clinical guidelines.In this study we investigate institutional variation in albumin use among medical centers in the United States during major non-cardiac surgery and explore the association of intraoperative albumin administration with important post-operative outcomes.The study is an observational retrospective cohort analysis performed among 54 hospitals in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) and includes adult patients who underwent major non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia between January 2014 and June 2020. The primary endpoint was the incidence of albumin administration. Secondary endpoints acute kidney injury (AKI), net-positive fluid balance, pulmonary complications, and 30-day mortality. Albumin-exposed and -unexposed cases were compared within a propensity score-matched cohort to evaluate associations of albumin use with outcomes.Among 614,215 major surgery cases, albumin was used in 15.3% (mostly isooncotic albumin) but with significant inter-institutional variability in use patterns. Cases involving intraoperative albumin administration were of a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status and received larger infused crystalloid volumes, had higher blood loss, and vasopressor use. Overall, albumin was most often administered at high-volume surgery centers with academic affiliation, and within a propensity score-matched cohort (n=153,218), the use of albumin was associated with AKI (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.20-1.28, P0.001), severe AKI (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.34-1.56, P0.001), net-positive fluid balance (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.20, P0.001), pulmonary complications (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.30-1.86, P0.001), and 30-day all-cause mortality (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.26-1.49, P0.001).Intravenous albumin is commonly administered among non-cardiac surgeries with significant inter-institutional variability in use in the United States. Albumin was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.

In 2013, a new liver transplant allocation policy (Share 35) aimed to reduce waitlist-mortality was introduced in the United States. Regional organ sharing for recipients with a MELD score of ≥35 was prioritized over local allocation to those with lower MELD scores. Our aim was to assess the changes in perioperative mortality following the introduction of Share 35 as well as changes in patients' short-term 7-day survival, patients discharged alive and 1-year survival. Analyses were also carried out for the subgroups of patients with MELD scores ≥ and 35.We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and included liver transplants between March 2002 and December 2018 in this retrospective cohort study. Perioperative mortality was defined as death during and within two days of liver transplant. We used robust interrupted time series analyses to evaluate the impact of Share 35 on mortality.We included 90 002 liver transplants in our analysis and observed a decreasing trend in perioperative mortality over time (-.061 deaths per 1000 cases per month, 95% CI -.084 to -.037, p .001). Share 35 was not associated with a change in perioperative mortality (p = .33), short-term 7-day survival (p = .48), survival to discharge (p = .56), or 1-year survival (p = .27).Prioritizing sicker recipients with a MELD score ≥35 for liver transplantation was not associated with a change in postoperative mortality.

The International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) has placed a strong focus on achieving gender equality and equity in liver transplant (LT). We aimed to understand gender distribution in leadership positions among LT physicians around the world and within ILTS.In 2019, the ILTS Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion Committee distributed a survey to obtain granular data on gender and characteristics of transplant physicians as well as those in leadership positions in each center. Additionally, data were collected on the gender composition of the ILTS membership, council, chairpersons, and committees and from the United Network for Organ Sharing.Data were collected from 243 transplant centers. Thirty-two (13.2%) had at least 1 woman as the director of LT, chief of transplant surgery, or chief of transplant hepatology. Of the 243 centers, 133 reported the age and gender of the leadership personnel. Women physicians comprised 152 of the 833 transplant surgeons (18.2%) and 298 of the 935 hepatologists (31.9%). Among the 1331 ILTS physician members, 588 (44.2%) provided gender information in their member profiles, and 155 (26.3%) identified themselves as women. Of the 26 ILTS leadership positions, 7 (26.9%) were held by women.This analysis of worldwide gender distribution in the LT physician workforce showed notable gender disparity in LT leadership around the globe and within the ILTS. These data provide a launching point for promoting and achieving gender equality and equity in LT.

BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. It remains controversial whether the choice of vena cava reconstruction technique impacts AKI. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective cohort of 897 liver transplants performed between June 2009 and September 2018 using either the vena cava preserving piggyback technique or caval replacement technique without veno-venous bypass or shunts. The association between vena cava reconstruction technique and stage of postoperative AKI was assessed using multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Causal mediation analysis was used to evaluate warm ischemia time as a potential mediator of this association. RESULTS The incidence of AKI (AKI stage ≥2) within 48 h after transplant was lower in the piggyback group (40.3%) compared to the caval replacement group (51.8%, P < 0.001). Piggyback technique was associated with a reduced risk of developing a higher stage of postoperative AKI (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.65, P < 0.001). Warm ischemia time was shorter in the piggyback group and identified as potential mediator of this effect. There was no difference in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate and the number of patients alive without dialysis) 1 y after transplant. CONCLUSIONS Piggyback technique, compared with caval replacement, was associated with a reduced incidence of AKI after liver transplantation. There was no difference in long-term renal outcomes between the 2 groups.

The wait times for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) listed for liver transplant are longer than ever, which has led to an increased reliance on the use of pre-operative LRTs. The impact that multiple rounds of LRTs have on peri-operative outcomes following transplant is unknown. This was a retrospective single center analysis of 298 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent liver transplant (January 2017 to May 2021). The data was obtained from two institution-specific databases and the TransQIP database. Of the 298 patients, 27 (9.1%) underwent no LRTs, 156 (52.4%) underwent 1-2 LRTs, and 115 (38.6%) underwent ≥3 LRTs prior to LT. The patients with ≥3 LRTs had a significantly higher rate of bile leak compared to patients who received 1-2 LRTs (7.0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.014). Unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses demonstrated a significant association between the total number of LRTs administered and bile leak, but not rates of overall biliary complications. The total number of LRTs was not significantly associated with any other peri-operative or post-operative outcome measure. These findings support the aggressive use of LRTs to control HCC in patients awaiting liver transplant, with further evaluation needed to confirm the biliary leak findings.

BACKGROUND Most patients are listed for liver transplant (LT) following extensive workup as outpatients ("conventional evaluation"). Some patients undergo urgent evaluation as inpatients after being transferred to a transplant center ("expedited evaluation"). We hypothesized that expedited patients would have inferior survival due to disease severity at the time of transplant and shorter workup time. METHODS Patients who underwent evaluation for LT at our institution between 2012-2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The expedited and conventional cohorts were defined as above. Living donor LT recipients, combined liver-kidney recipients, acute liver failure patients, and re-transplant patients were excluded. We compared patient characteristics and overall survival between patients who received a transplant following expedited evaluation and those who did not, and between LT recipients based on expedited or conventional evaluation. RESULTS 509 patients were included (110 expedited, 399 conventional). There was no difference in graft or patient survival at one year for expedited versus conventional LT recipients. In multivariable analysis of overall survival, only Donor Risk Index (HR 1.97, CI 1.04-3.73, p = 0.037, per unit increase) was associated with increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent expedited evaluation for LT had significant demographic and clinical differences from patients who underwent conventional evaluation, but comparable post-transplant survival. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Background: Scoring systems have been proposed to select donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors and recipients for liver transplantation (LT). We hypothesized that complex scoring systems derived in large datasets might not predict outcomes locally.Methods: Based on 1-year DCD-LT graft survival predictors in multivariate logistic regression models, we designed, validated, and compared a simple index using the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) cohort (n = 136) and a universal-comprehensive (UC)-DCD score using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) cohort (n = 5,792) to previously published DCD scoring systems.Results: The total warm ischemia time (WIT)-index included donor WIT (dWIT) and hepatectomy time (dHep). The UC-DCD score included dWIT, dHep, recipient on mechanical ventilation, transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt, cause of liver disease, model for end-stage liver disease, body mass index, donor/recipient age, and cold ischemia time. In the UNOS cohort, the UC-score outperformed all previously published scores in predicting DCD-LT graft survival (AUC: 0.635 vs. ≤0.562). In the UCSF cohort, the total WIT index successfully stratified survival and biliary complications, whereas other scores did not.Conclusion: DCD risk scores generated in large cohorts provide general guidance for safe recipient/donor selection, but they must be tailored based on non-/partially-modifiable local circumstances to expand DCD utilization.

BACKGROUND Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is a common occurrence and correlates with poor graft and patient outcomes. Donor characteristics and care are known to impact DGF. We attempted to show the relationship between achievement of specific donor management goals (DMG) and DGF. METHODS This is a retrospective case-control study using data from 14 046 adult kidney donations after brain death from hospitals in 18 organ procurement organizations (OPOs) which were transplanted to adult recipients between 2012 and 2018. Data on DMG compliance and donor, recipient, and ischemia-related factors were used to create multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS The overall rate of DGF was 29.4%. Meeting DMGs for urine output and vasopressor use were associated with decreased risk of DGF. Sensitivity analyses performed with different imputation methods, omitting recipient factors, and analyzing multiple time points yielded largely consistent results. CONCLUSIONS The development of DMGs continues to show promise in improving outcomes in the kidney transplant recipient population. Studies have already shown increased kidney utilization in smaller cohorts, as well as other organs, and shown decreased rates of DGF. Additional research and analysis are required to assess interactions between meeting DMGs and correlation versus causality in DMGs and DGF.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background. Early prediction of whether a liver allograft will be utilized for transplantation may allow better resource deployment during donor management and improve organ allocation. The national donor management goals (DMG) registry contains critical care data collected during donor management. We developed a machine learning model to predict transplantation of a liver graft based on data from the DMG registry. Methods. Several machine learning classifiers were trained to predict transplantation of a liver graft. We utilized 127 variables available in the DMG dataset. We included data from potential deceased organ donors between April 2012 and January 2019. The outcome was defined as liver recovery for transplantation in the operating room. The prediction was made based on data available 12–18 h after the time of authorization for transplantation. The data were randomly separated into training (60%), validation (20%), and test sets (20%). We compared the performance of our models to the Liver Discard Risk Index. Results. Of 13 629 donors in the dataset, 9255 (68%) livers were recovered and transplanted, 1519 recovered but used for research or discarded, 2855 were not recovered. The optimized gradient boosting machine classifier achieved an area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic of 0.84 on the test set, outperforming all other classifiers. Conclusions. This model predicts successful liver recovery for transplantation in the operating room, using data available early during donor management. It performs favorably when compared to existing models. It may provide real-time decision support during organ donor management and transplant logistics.

PLOS ONE 17(1), e0262110 (2022). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262110, Published by PLOS, San Francisco, California, US

Background: Current guidelines recommend the monitoring of anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels to avoid an accumulation of low-molecular-weight heparins in patients with acute kidney injury, but there is no evidence on how to proceed with such monitoring during continuous renal replacement therapy. Against this background, we investigated the potential accumulation of enoxaparin administered subcutaneously for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill patients during continuous renal replacement therapy covered by regional citrate anticoagulation. Methods: Anti-Xa levels were measured at baseline (≤12 h before renal replacement therapy) and on three consecutive days (A to C) when enoxaparin had reached trough levels. Supplementary testing included modified assays of rotational thromboelastometry known to be highly sensitive for low-molecular-weight heparins. Results: The 16 men and 13 women included were adults comparable in age, body mass index, thromboembolism risk assessment, and clinical severity of the disease. Throughout the four examinations, the median trough levels of anti-Xa remained below the detection limit of the test (&lt, 0.1 IU mL−1), with interquartile ranges of &lt, 0.1 to 0.14 IU mL−1 at baseline and &lt, 0.1 to 0.16 IU mL−1 on days A/B/C. All rotational thromboelastometry parameters of clot initiation and clot formation dynamics did not significantly change from baseline to day C. Conclusions: Neither anti-Xa levels nor modified assays of rotational thromboelastometry revealed any accumulation of enoxaparin administered for thromboprophylaxis during continuous renal replacement therapy covered by regional citrate anticoagulation. Although generally recommended in patients with acute kidney injury, monitoring of anti-Xa levels should be questioned in this defined setting.

Background Postoperative pain after living donor hepatectomy is significant. Postoperative coagulopathy may limit the use of epidural analgesia, the gold standard for pain control in abdominal surgery. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional anesthesia technique that has been shown to provide effective analgesia in abdominal surgery. In this study, we examined the effect of continuous ESPB, administered via catheters, on perioperative opioid requirements after right living donor hepatectomies for liver transplantation. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients undergoing right living donor hepatectomy. Twenty-four patients who received preoperative ESPB were compared to 51 historical controls who did not receive regional anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the total amount of oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) required on the day of surgery and postoperative day (POD) 1. Results Patients in the ESPB group required a lower total amount of OMEs on the day of surgery and POD 1 [141 (107 - 188) mg] compared the control group [293 (220 - 380) mg; P Conclusions The use of continuous ESPB significantly reduced opioid consumption following right living donor hepatectomy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This retrospective observational case series conducted at 2 large academic centers over a 4-year period consists of 15 cases of profound hypotension in surgical patients immediately after initiation of the Belmont Fluid Management System for rapid transfusion of blood products. Halting the infusion and administering vasoactive agents led to resolution of hypotension. Repeat transfusion with the Belmont system resulted in repeat hypotension unless counteracted with vasopressors. No etiology was elucidated. This represents the largest documented association of acute hypotensive transfusion reaction with any rapid infusion system in surgical patients.

Risk factors for early bleeding complications after lung transplantation are not well described. Our aim was to evaluate coagulation test results and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as risk factors for bleeding after lung transplantation. We analyzed a single-center cohort of bilateral lung transplants between January 2009 and August 2015. Predictors of severe postoperative bleeding (bleeding requiring reoperation within 48 h of transplantation) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. The effect of bleeding on survival was assessed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Twenty-nine (4.5%) of 641 patients experienced severe postoperative bleeding. Postoperative fibrinogen levels (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.995, P = 0.001; per mg/dl increase) and pre- and postoperative use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR = 14.41% 95% CI 5.4-40.19, P < 0.001 and OR = 4.25, 95% CI 1.0-11.09, P = 0.002, respectively) were associated with an increased risk of severe postoperative bleeding. Severe postoperative bleeding was associated with decreased survival within 60 days after transplantation (adjusted HR = 5.73, 95% CI 2.52-13.02, P < 0.001). Low postoperative fibrinogen levels, and pre- and postoperative use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were risk factors for bleeding after lung transplantation.

Author(s): Whelan, Adrian M; Johansen, Kirsten L; McCulloch, Charles E; Adelmann, Dieter; Niemann, Claus U; Roll, Garrett R; Siyahian, Salpi; Grimes, Barbara; Ku, Elaine | Abstract: Rates of kidney transplantation vary substantially across dialysis facilities in the United States. Whether distance between the dialysis facility and transplant center associates with variations in transplantation rates has not been examined.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of adults treated with dialysis between 2005 and 2015, according to the US Renal Data System. We examined the association between distance from dialysis facility to transplant center and time to kidney transplantation (primary outcome) and waitlist registration (secondary outcome) using Fine-Gray models. We also performed sensitivity analyses using the distance from each patient's dialysis facility to the nearest transplant center as the predictor so that patients who were never registered on the waitlist (and therefore would not have a transplant center) could be included.ResultsIn total, 178 885 waitlisted patients were included for our primary analysis. As distance between dialysis facility and transplant center increased, lower hazard of transplantation (subhazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.94, if distance was 10 to l50 miles; sub-HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.92, if distance ≥50 miles compared with l10 miles) was noted. We also found a weak association between longer distance and hazard of waitlist registration (sub-HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97, if distance was ≥50 miles versus l10 miles). Findings were similar in sensitivity analyses using distance between dialysis facility and the nearest transplant center (N = 1 149 721).ConclusionsPatients receiving dialysis in facilities located further away from transplant centers have lower hazard of kidney transplantation. Developing strategies to address barriers to transplantation in patients receiving dialysis at facilities located far away from a transplant center may help improve disparities in transplantation rates.

Author(s): Syed, Shareef M; Gardner, James; Roll, Garrett; Webber, Allison; Mehta, Neil; Shoji, Jun; Adelmann, Dieter; Niemann, Claus; Braun, Hillary J; Mello, Anna; Yao, Francis; Posselt, Andrew; Kang, Sang-Mo; Hirose, Ryutaro; Roberts, John; Feng, Sandy; Ascher, Nancy; Stock, Peter; Freise, Chris | Abstract: BackgroundThe novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) disease has transformed innumerable aspects of medical practice, particularly in the field of transplantation.Main bodyHere we describe a single-center approach to creating a generalizable, comprehensive, and graduated set of recommendations to respond in stepwise fashion to the challenges posed by these conditions, and the underlying principles guiding such decisions.ConclusionsCreation of a stepwise plan will allow transplant centers to respond in a dynamic fashion to the ongoing challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. It remains controversial whether the choice of vena cava reconstruction technique impacts AKI.This is a single-center retrospective cohort of 897 liver transplants performed between June 2009 and September 2018 using either the vena cava preserving piggyback technique or caval replacement technique without veno-venous bypass or shunts. The association between vena cava reconstruction technique and stage of postoperative AKI was assessed using multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Causal mediation analysis was used to evaluate warm ischemia time as a potential mediator of this association.The incidence of AKI (AKI stage ≥2) within 48 h after transplant was lower in the piggyback group (40.3%) compared to the caval replacement group (51.8%, P0.001). Piggyback technique was associated with a reduced risk of developing a higher stage of postoperative AKI (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.65, P0.001). Warm ischemia time was shorter in the piggyback group and identified as potential mediator of this effect. There was no difference in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate and the number of patients alive without dialysis) 1 y after transplant.Piggyback technique, compared with caval replacement, was associated with a reduced incidence of AKI after liver transplantation. There was no difference in long-term renal outcomes between the 2 groups.

Acute kidney injury (AKI), or worsening kidney function, is a common complication after liver transplantation (20-90% in published studies). Patients who experience AKI after liver transplantation have higher mortality, increased graft loss, longer hospital and intensive care unit stays, and more progression to chronic kidney disease compared with those who do not. In this study, half of the participants will have their body temperature cooled to slightly lower than normal (mild hypothermia) for a portion of the liver transplant operation, while the other half will have their body temperature maintained at normal. The study will evaluate if mild hypothermia protects from AKI during liver transplantation. This study is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of mild hypothermia during liver transplantation to provide protection from AKI. Participants will be randomized to normothermia (36.5-37.5 °C) versus mild hypothermia (34-35 °C) during a portion of the liver transplant operation. The protocol is based on preliminary data from rodent models showing that hypothermia protects the kidneys from ischemia-reperfusion injury, as well as studies in deceased organ donors showing that cooling improves post-transplant organ function. Temperature will be maintained with standard techniques plus a minimally-invasive esophageal cooling device that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The investigators hypothesize that mild hypothermia will reduce the incidence and severity of AKI after LTx. Standard surrogates (e.g., change in serum creatinine, need for initiation of dialysis) and biomarkers will be used to assess the severity of kidney injury.

In liver transplantation, both cold and warm ischemia times are known to impact early graft function. The extraction time is a period during the initial phase of organ cooling which occurs during deceased donor procurement. During this time, the organ is at risk of suboptimal cooling. Whether donor extraction time, the time from donor aortic cross-clamp to removal of the donor organ from the body cavity has an effect on early graft function is not known.We investigated the effect of donor extraction time on early graft function in 292 recipients of liver grafts procured locally and transplanted at our center between June 2012 and December 2016. Early graft function was assessed using the model of early allograft function score in a multivariable regression model including donor extraction time, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, donor risk index, and terminal donor sodium.Donor extraction time had an independent effect on early graft function measured by the model of early allograft function score (coefficient, 0.021; 95% confidence interval, 0.007-0.035; P0.01; for each minute increase of donor extraction time). Besides donor extraction time, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, and donor risk index had a significant effect on early graft function.We demonstrate an independent effect of donor extraction time on graft function after liver transplantation. Efforts to minimize donor extraction time could improve early graft function in liver transplantation.

Background Renal failure is common among patients undergoing liver transplantation. Liver allocation based on the model for end-stage liver disease score has increased the number of recipients who require perioperative renal replacement therapy (RRT). Although RRT can be continued intraoperatively, the risks and benefits of intraoperative RRT are not well defined. The aim of this study is to report the intraoperative management of patients with pretransplant renal failure at a transplant center with extremely infrequent utilization of intraoperative RRT. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients undergoing orthotopic liver or simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantation between June 2009 and December 2015. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their need for pretransplant RRT. Results A total of 785 patients underwent liver or SLK transplant during the study period. One hundred and seventy-four patients (22.2%) required preoperative dialysis. Only 2 patients required intraoperative RRT. There was no difference in the incidence of acidosis or hyperkalemia between patients who required preoperative dialysis and those who did not. Conclusions We describe the successful management of patients undergoing liver or SLK transplantation almost entirely without the need for intraoperative RRT.

The anesthesia community has openly debated if the care of transplant patients was generalist or specialist care ever since the publication of an opinion paper in 1999 recommended subspecialty training in the field of liver transplantation anesthesia. In the past decade, liver transplant anesthesia has become more complex with a sicker patient population and evolving evidence-based practices. Transplant training is currently not required for accreditation or certification in anesthesiology, and not all anesthesia residency programs are associated with transplant centers. Yet there is evidence that patient outcome is affected by the experience of the anesthesiologist with liver transplants as part of a multidisciplinary care team. Requests for a formal review of the inequities in training opportunities and requirements led the Society for the Advancement for Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) to begin the task of developing post-graduate fellowship training recommendations. In this article, members of the SATA Working Group on Transplant Anesthesia Education present their reasoning for specialized education and conclusions about which pathways can better prepare trainees to care for complex transplant patients.

Background Severe burns can induce a hypercoagulable state which is not depicted in conventional coagulation assays. The thrombin generation assay allows global assessment of coagulation and can identify hypercoagulability. We report changes in thrombin generation in patients after severe burn injury. Methods We measured TGA, rotational thrombelastometry and conventional assays in 20 consecutive patients with a total body surface area burned of >20% over a 2-week period: the day after burn trauma (A), the morning after surgical excision of burn wounds (B) and on post-admission days 7 (C) and 14 (D). Results Thrombin generation assay showed a procoagulatory state: there was an increase in the velocity of thrombin generation (increase in time to peak of +13%, increase in velocity index of +22%), and peak amount of thrombin (+25%) between days A and B. All parameters reached their highest levels on day C and returned towards normal on day D. Rotational thrombelastometry showed a hypercoagulable state with an increase in clot firmness and alpha angle. Conventional coagulation tests remained within reference values. Conclusions In the first two weeks following burn, both the thrombin generation assay and rotational thrombelastometry show a hypercoagulable state, while conventional coagulation tests remain normal.

The provision of anesthesia for a liver transplant program requires a dedicated team of anesthesiologists. Liver transplant anesthesiologists must have an understanding of liver physiology and anatomy; the spectrum of clinical disease associated with liver dysfunction; the impact of warm and cold ischemia times, surgical techniques in liver transplantation, and the impact of ischemia-reperfusion syndrome; and optimal practices to protect the liver. The team must provide a 24-hour service, be actively involved in the selection committee process, and stay current with advances in the subspecialty.

Background Routine drug monitoring is not required for the two novel direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban. Rapidly available test results might be beneficial in case of bleeding or prior to urgent surgery. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the two rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM®) -modifications Low–tissue factor activated ROTEM® (LowTF–ROTEM®) and Prothrombinase induced clotting time – activated ROTEM® (PiCT®–ROTEM®) for determination of apixaban and rivaroxaban in vitro and ex vivo. Methods Blood samples from 20 volunteers were spiked with apixaban / rivaroxaban to yield samples with ascending drug concentrations ranging from 50 – 400 ng/mL. LowTF – and PiCT® modified ROTEM® tests and determination of the corresponding antifactor Xa activity were performed in duplicate in 280 samples. LowTF–ROTEM® tests were performed in samples from 20 patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban therapy and 20 controls. Results There was a strong correlation between apixaban / rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and the LowTF–ROTEM® parameters Clotting time (CT; spearman correlation coefficient (SCC) 0.81 and 0.81, respectively) and Time to maximum velocity (t,MaxVel; SCC: 0.81 and 0.80, resp.) and a low to moderate correlation for the PiCT®–ROTEM® parameters CT (SCC: 0.38 and 0.59, resp.) and t,MaxVel. (0.51 and 0.69, resp.) in the in vitro experiments. LowTF–ROTEM CT was significantly prolonged in patients on apxiaban or rivaroxaban therapy compared to controls. Conclusions LowTF–ROTEM® could be a valuable diagnostic tool for rapid determination of the effect of apixaban and rivaroxaban at the point of care.

Background Caudal anaesthesia is a common procedure for infants and children undergoing subumbilical surgery, mostly performed in conjunction with general anaesthesia. Even if complications are rare, the risk of postoperative apnoea is significant, especially in infants born preterm or operated upon before 46 weeks of post-conceptual age. Caudal block in sedated, spontaneously breathing patients might be a safe alternative. Methods We investigated 512 infants and children. Premedication consisted of midazolam, sedation was induced with i.v. nalbuphine 0.1 mg kg−1 and propofol 1 mg kg−1, and maintained with propofol 5 mg kg−1 h−1 in children, if necessary. Caudal block was performed with ropivacaine 1 ml kg−1 (0.2% or 0.35%). Results Data were obtained from 228 infants and 284 children. Median (IQR) age was 1.3 (0.2, 3.4) yr; median body weight was 10.0 (4.8, 15.3) kg. Two hundred and thirty-three (45.51%) were born preterm and 47 (9.18%) were operated upon before 46 weeks of post-conceptual age. Caudal block was successful in 98.05% and adverse events occurred in 7.03% patients. The incidence of adverse events was not higher in born preterm or operated upon before 46 weeks of post-conceptual age than in term born infants (P=0.35 and 0.35, respectively), or in infants vs children (P=0.61). There was no correlation between the incidence of adverse events and continuous sedation (P=0.07), coexisting diseases (P=0.11), or ASA classification (P=0.33). Conclusions Caudal anaesthesia under sedation is associated with high success rates and a low incidence of adverse events, but requires careful and anticipatory perioperative management.

Background During kidney transplantation, intraoperative fluid management can affect post-transplant graft function. It is unclear whether or not central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring is required to guide fluid therapy during kidney transplantation. Methods We compared post-transplant graft function in recipients of living donor kidney transplants between August 2006 and March 2009 based on the use or absence of intraoperative CVP monitoring. Graft function, assessed using the creatinine reduction ratio on postoperative day 2 (CCR2), was evaluated by multivariable linear regression analysis and in a propensity-matched cohort. Results Two-hundred and ninety patients were included in the analysis. Central venous pressure was monitored in 84 patients. (29%) There was no difference in post-transplant graft function, as measured by CCR2, between patients with- and without CVP monitoring in both unadjusted and multivariable adjusted analysis. There were also no statistically significant differences in CCR2, delayed graft function, or 3-month renal function between those monitored with CVP, and those without, in the propensity-matched cohort. Conclusions In this single center analysis, immediate post-transplant renal function was not associated with the use of intraoperative CVP monitoring. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Introduction Administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip surgery. In this context, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is a complication of rare incidence but sometimes fatal outcome. Case description A 52-year old obese patient undergoing antithrombotic therapy with Enoxaparin after hip surgery presented with a painful, swollen leg and thrombocytopenia on day eight after surgery. Medical history showed previous administration of Enoxaparin without complications 2 years ago. Further diagnostic investigation supplied evidence of multiple thromboembolic events and concomitant compartment syndrome. Administration of Enoxaparin was stopped immediately and treatment with Argatroban was initiated. Diagnosis of HIT was confirmed according to current guidelines. Despite interventional thrombectomy and fasciotomy, amputation of both lower limbs had to be performed due to ongoing necroses. After a 30-days-stay at the intensive care unit because of sepsis, respiratory and renal failure, clinical condition improved and the patient could be transferred for rehabilitation. Discussion and evaluation HIT II is known as complication of administration of LMWH in the perioperative setting. Diagnosis results from clinical findings and platelet count. Argatroban is recommended as an alternative therapeutic anticoagulant in HIT II. Inflammation and surgical trauma are discussed as priming factors to increase risk of HIT II. Conclusions Administration of LMWH may result in HIT II despite prior uneventful drug exposure. Except for immediate diagnosis, only consequent anticoagulation can stop the course of disease. Hence, interdisciplinary awareness is inevitable for early diagnosis and accurate therapy to prevent from a catastrophic clinical course.

Background Postoperative haemorrhage in neurosurgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is controversy whether or not factor XIII (FXIII) deficiency leads to bleeding complications after craniotomy. Decreased fibrinogen levels have been associated with an increased incidence of bleeding complications in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this study was to assess perioperative fibrinogen and FXIII levels in patients undergoing elective intracranial surgery with and without severe bleeding events. Methods Perioperative FXIII and fibrinogen levels were prospectively assessed in 290 patients undergoing elective craniotomy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of severe bleeding requiring surgical revision. Coagulation test results of these groups were compared using Student's t -test. Results The incidence of postoperative severe bleeding was 2.4%. No differences in FXIII levels were observed, but postoperative fibrinogen levels were significantly lower in patients suffering from postoperative haematoma compared with those without postoperative intracranial bleeding complications [237 mg dl −1 (standard deviation, sd 86) vs 170 mg dl −1 ( sd 35), P =0.03]. The odds ratio for postoperative haematoma in patients with a postoperative fibrinogen level below 200 mg dl −1 was 10.02 (confidence interval: 1.19–84.40, P =0.03). Conclusions This study emphasizes the role of fibrinogen as potentially modifiable risk factor for perioperative bleeding in intracranial surgery. Future randomized controlled trials will be essential to identify patients who might benefit from fibrinogen substitution during neurosurgical procedures.

Spatestens seit der Wiedervereinigung im Jahr 1990 hat die Problematik der Altlastenerhebung und -sanierung nochmals an Bedeutung gewonnen.