Search

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to cause hospitalizations and severe disease in children and adults., Methods: This study compared the risk factors, symptoms, and outcomes of children and adults hospitalized for COVID-19 from March 2020 to May 2023 across age strata at 5 US sites participating in the Predicting Viral-Associated Inflammatory Disease Severity in Children with Laboratory Diagnostics and Artificial Intelligence consortium. Eligible patients had an upper respiratory swab that tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by nucleic acid amplification. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of clinical outcomes were determined for children versus adults, for pediatric age strata compared to adolescents (12-17 years), and for adult age strata compared to young adults (22-49 years)., Results: Of 9101 patients in the Predicting Viral-Associated Inflammatory Disease Severity in Children with Laboratory Diagnostics and Artificial Intelligence cohort, 1560 were hospitalized for COVID-19 as the primary reason. Compared to adults (22-105 years, n = 675), children (0-21 years, n = 885) were less commonly vaccinated (14.3% vs 34.5%), more commonly infected with the Omicron variant (49.5% vs 26.1%) and had fewer comorbidities ( P < .001 for most comparisons), except for lung disease ( P = .24). After adjusting for confounding variables, children had significantly lower odds of receiving supplemental oxygen (aOR, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, .35-.92) and death (aOR, 0.011; 95% confidence interval, <.01-.58) compa--red to adults. Among pediatric age strata, adolescents 12-17 years had the highest odds of receiving supplemental oxygen, high-flow oxygen, and ICU admission. Among adults, those 50-64 years had the highest odds of mechanical ventilation and ICU admission., Conclusions: Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 differed across pediatric and adult age strata. Adolescents experienced the most severe disease among children, whereas adults 50-64 years experienced the most severe disease among adults., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. C. A. R.'s institution has received funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, BioFire Inc, GSK, MedImmune, Janssen, Merck, Moderna, Novavax, PaxVax, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi-Pasteur. She is co-inventor of patented RSV vaccine technology, which has been licensed to Meissa Vaccines, Inc. C. Y. C. receives research funding from Abbott Laboratories and Delve Bio on unrelated pathogen detection and discovery projects using metagenomic next-generation sequencing and is a cofounder of and owns equity in Delve Bio. C. Y. C. is also on the scientific advisory board for Biomeme, Biomesense, Flightpath Biosciences, Mammoth Biosciences, and Poppy Health. C. K. is a consultant for Ferring/Rebiotix and a scientific advisor for Seres Therapeutics. A. V. A. is a stockholder of Alzeca Inc. and Sensulin LLC and is on the scientific advisory board of Alezeca Inc., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Competing Interests: J.D.B. is a consultant for BioFire Diagnostics and has received research funding for other studies not related to this work. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Medical microbiologists, defined as doctoral-level laboratory directors with subspecialty training in medical microbiology, lead the clinical laboratory operations through activities such as clinical consultations, oversight of diagnostic testing menu, institutional leadership, education, and scholastic activities. However, unlike their clinical colleagues, medical microbiologists are largely unable to bill for clinical consultations performed within the hospital and, therefore, unable to generate relative value units or a similar quantifiable metric. As hospital budgets tighten and justification of staffing becomes a necessity, this may present a challenge to the medical microbiologist attempting to prove their value to the organization. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. Consults were generated equally from internal (laboratory-based) and external (hospital-based) parties, with the majority directly impacting patient management. Near universal acceptance of the medical microbiologist's recommendation highlights the worth derived from their expertise. External consults required more time commitment from the medical microbiologist than internal consults, although both presented ample opportunity for secondary value, including impact through stewardship, education, clinical guidance, and cost reduction. This study is a description of the content and impact of consultations that underscore the importance of the medical microbiologist as a key member of the healthcare team., Importance: Medical microbiologists are invaluable to the clinical microbiology laboratory and the healthcare system as a whole. However, as medical microbiologists do not regularly generate relative value units, capturing and quantifying the value provided is challenging. As hospital budgets tighten, justification of staffing becomes a necessity. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide detailed evaluation of the consultative value provided by medical microbiologists.

The timely identification of microbial pathogens is essential to guide targeted antimicrobial therapy and ultimately, successful treatment of an infection. However, the yield of standard microbiology testing (SMT) is directly related to the duration of antecedent antimicrobial therapy as SMT culture methods are dependent on the recovery of viable organisms, the fastidious nature of certain pathogens, and other pre-analytic factors. In the last decade, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been successfully utilized as a diagnostic tool for various applications within the clinical laboratory. However, mNGS is resource, time, and labor-intensive-requiring extensive laborious preliminary benchwork, followed by complex bioinformatic analysis. We aimed to address these shortcomings by developing a largely Automated targeted Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (tmNGS) PipeLine for rapId inFectIous disEase Diagnosis (AMPLIFIED) to detect bacteria and fungi directly from clinical specimens. Therefore, AMPLIFIED may serve as an adjunctive approach to complement SMT. This tmNGS pipeline requires less than 1 hour of hands-on time before sequencing and less than 2 hours of total processing time, including bioinformatic analysis. We performed tmNGS on 50 clinical specimens with concomitant cultures to assess feasibility and performance in the hospital laboratory. Of the 50 specimens, 34 (68%) were from true clinical infections. Specimens from cases of true infection were more often tmNGS positive compared to those from the non-infected group (82.4% vs 43.8%, respectively, P = 0.0087). Overall, the clinical sensitivity of AMPLIFIED was 54.6% with 85.7% specificity, equating to 70.6% and 75% negative and positive predictive values, respectively. AMPLIFIED represents a rapid supplementary approach to SMT; the typical time from specimen receipt to identification of potential pathogens by AMPLIFIED is roughly 24 hours which is markedly faster than the days, weeks, and months required to recover bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial pathogens by culture, respectively., Importance: To our knowledge, this represents the first application of an automated sequencing and bioinformatics pipeline in an exclusively pediatric population. Next-generation sequencing is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and requires experienced personnel; perhaps contributing to hesitancy among clinical laboratories to adopt such a test. Here, we report a strong case for use by removing these barriers through near-total automation of our sequencing pipeline., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background: Multiplex molecular diagnostic panels have greatly enhanced detection of gastrointestinal pathogens. However, data on the impact of these tests on clinical and patient-centered outcomes are limited., Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge trial to determine the impact of multiplex molecular testing at 5 academic children's hospitals on children presenting to the emergency department with acute gastroenteritis. Caregivers were interviewed on enrollment and 7-10 days after enrollment to determine symptoms, risk factors, subsequent medical visits, and impact on family members. During the pre-intervention period, diagnostic testing was performed at the clinician's discretion . During the intervention period, multiplex molecular testing was performed on all children, with results available to clinicians. The primary outcome was return visits to a healthcare provider within 10 days of enrollment., Results: Potential pathogens were identified by clinician-ordered tests in 19 of 571 (3.3%) in the pre-intervention period compared with 434 of 586 (74%) in the intervention period; clinically relevant pathogens were detected in 2.1% and 15%, respectively. In the multivariate model, the intervention was associated with a 21% reduction in the odds of any return visit (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, .70-.90) after adjusting for potential confounders. Appropriate treatment was prescribed in 11.3% compared with 19.6% during the intervention period (P = .22)., Conclusions: Routine molecular multiplex testing for all children who presented to the ED with acute gastroenteritis detected more clinically relevant pathogens and led to a 21% decrease in return visits. Additional research is needed to define patients most likely to benefit from testing. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02248285., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. J. D. B reports research support and consulting funding from bioMerieux. R. S. reports reseach funding from Biomerieux, Hologic, Qiagen, Abbott, Cepheid, and Luminex. J. M. B reports consulting fees from Gradientech. J. D. B. reports consulting fees from bioMerieux. K. M. H. and K. M. B. are employees of bioMerieux. A. M. L. reports consulting or research funding from Cepheid, Meridian Diagnostics, Diasorin, and Hologic. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The applications of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the clinical microbiology laboratory are expanding at a rapid pace. The medical microbiologist thus plays a key role in translating the results of these emerging technologies to the practicing clinician. Here we discuss the factors to consider to successfully develop standardized reporting for microbial targeted or metagenomic NGS testing in the clinical laboratory., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Staphylococcus saprophyticus is the second most common bacteria associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women. The antimicrobial treatment regimen for uncomplicated UTI is normally nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), or a fluoroquinolone without routine susceptibility testing of S. saprophyticus recovered from urine specimens. However, TMP-SMX-resistant S. saprophyticus has been detected recently in UTI patients, as well as in our cohort. Herein, we investigated the understudied resistance patterns of this pathogenic species by linking genomic antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) content to susceptibility phenotypes. We describe ARG associations with known and novel SCC mec configurations as well as phage elements in S. saprophyticus , which may serve as intervention or diagnostic targets to limit resistance transmission. Our analyses yielded a comprehensive database of phenotypic data associated with the ARG sequence in clinical S. saprophyticus isolates, which will be crucial for resistance surveillance and prediction to enable precise diagnosis and effective treatment of S. saprophyticus UTIs., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The bioMérieux BIOFIRE Joint Infection (JI) Panel is a multiplex in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous and rapid (~1 h) detection of 39 potential pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes directly from synovial fluid (SF) samples. Thirty-one species or groups of microorganisms are included in the kit, as well as several AMR genes. This study, performed to evaluate the BIOFIRE JI Panel for regulatory clearance, provides data from a multicenter evaluation of 1,544 prospectively collected residual SF samples with performance compared to standard-of-care (SOC) culture for organisms or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing for AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.9% or greater for all but six organisms and a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100% for all AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel demonstrated a specificity of 98.5% or greater for detection of all organisms and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 95.7% or greater for all AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel provides an improvement over SOC culture, with a substantially shorter time to result for both organisms and AMR genes with excellent sensitivity/PPA and specificity/NPA, and is anticipated to provide timely and actionable diagnostic information for joint infections in a variety of clinical scenarios., Competing Interests: J.E. has received research funding from bioMérieux and has served as a consultant for bioMérieux. AL has received research funding from BioFire, Cepheid, and Luminex. J.M.B.L. has served as a consultant for bioMérieux and has also participated in other BioFire clinical studies. B.S. has received research funding from BioFire, Becton, Dickinson and Company, and DiaSorin.

Competing Interests: Dr. Melinda Braskett is a consultant for Bryn Pharma—activities are unrelated to the content of this manuscript. Dr. Jennifer Dien Bard is a consultant for BioFire Diagnostics and has received research funding for other studies not related to this work. All other authors have indicated they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Background: During active transcription, SARS-CoV-2 generates subgenomic regions of viral RNA. While standard SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR amplifies region(s) of genomic RNA, it cannot distinguish active infection from remnant viral genomic material. However, screening for subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) by RT-PCR may aid in the determination of actively transcribing virus., Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of SARS-CoV-2 sgRNA RT-PCR testing in a pediatric population., Study Design: Retrospective analysis was performed on inpatients from February-September 2022 positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR with a concomitant order for sgRNA RT-PCR. Chart abstractions were conducted to determine clinical outcomes, management, and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices., Results: Of 95 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples from 75 unique patients, 27 (28.4%) were positive by sgRNA RT-PCR. A negative sgRNA RT-PCR test allowed for de-isolation in 68 (71.6%) patient episodes. Regardless of age or sex, a positive sgRNA RT-PCR result significantly correlated with disease severity (P = 0.007), generalized COVID-19 symptoms (P = 0.012), hospitalization for COVID-19 (P = 0.019), and immune status (P = 0.024). Moreover, sgRNA RT-PCR results prompted changes in management in 28 patients (37.3%); specifically, therapeutic escalation in 13/27 (48.1%) positives and de-escalation in 15/68 (22.1%) negatives., Conclusions: Taken together, these findings underscore the clinical utility of sgRNA RT-PCR testing in a pediatric population as we report significant associations between sgRNA RT-PCR results and clinical parameters related to COVID-19. These findings align with the proposed use of sgRNA RT-PCR testing to guide patient management and IPC practices in the hospital setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) utilizes reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify respiratory pathogens. This panel qualitatively detects and identifies 14 viruses, including influenza virus A with H1 pdm09, H1, and H3 subtyping; influenza B; respiratory syncytial virus (RSV); human metapneumovirus; parainfluenza virus 1; parainfluenza virus 2; parainfluenza virus 3; parainfluenza virus 4; coronavirus (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1); adenovirus; and human rhinovirus/enterovirus, and 3 bacteria, including Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis. Reproducibility, which was assessed with contrived specimens containing 12 targets at 3 clinical sites, with 2 operators at each site for 5 days, was 99.4% for Flu A H3 and Flu B, 98.9% for RSV, and 100% for the remaining 9 targets assayed. A multicenter clinical trial evaluated the performance of the BioCode RPP with 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from 5 geographically distinct sites and revealed comparable performance between the BioCode RPP and FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FA-RP). Specifically, the positive percent agreements (PPAs) for various pathogens ranged between 80.8% and 100% compared with the FA-RP (1.7 and 2.0). Negative percent agreement ranged from 98.4% to 100% for BioCode RPP. The BioCode RPP also offers scalable automated testing capability of up to 96 specimens in a single run with total sample-to-result time under 5 h. The invalid rate of the BioCode RPP on initial testing was 1.0% (26/2,649). IMPORTANCE Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) is a high-throughput test that utilizes RT-PCR in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify 17 respiratory pathogens, including 14 viruses and 3 bacteria. This study summarizes data generated from a multicenter clinical trial evaluating the performance of the BioCode RPP on 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from five geographically distinct sites., Competing Interests: The authors declare a conflict of interest. A.P. and M.A. are employees of Applied BioCode. C.K. was an employee of Applied BioCode.

Background: We assessed how laboratories use and handle reporting of results of rapid diagnostics performed on positive blood culture broths, with a focus on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers., Methods: A survey assembled by the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Diagnostics Committee was circulated from December 2020 to May 2021. The survey was sent to local hospitals, shared on the ClinMicroNet and Division C listservs, and included in a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey., Results: Ninety-six laboratories of various sizes across the United States (95%) and outside of the United States (5%) participated. Of the laboratories that had at least 1 rapid diagnostic in place (94%), significant heterogeneity in methods used and reporting practices was found across community (52%) and academic (40%) laboratories serving hospitals of various sizes. Respondents had implemented 1 to 6 different panels/platforms for a total of 31 permutations. Methods of reporting rapid organism identification and AMR results varied from listing all targets as "detected"/"not detected" (16-22%) without interpretive guidance, to interpreting results (23-42%), or providing therapeutic guidance comments to patient-facing healthcare teams (3-17%)., Conclusions: Current approaches to reporting molecular AMR test results from positive blood culture vary significantly across clinical laboratories. Providing interpretative comments with therapeutic guidance alongside results reported may assist clinicians who are not well-versed in genetic mechanisms of AMR. However, this is currently not being done in all clinical laboratories. Standardized strategies for AMR gene result reporting are needed., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. P. J. S. reports grants and personal fees from Accelerate Diagnostics, OpGen Inc, bioMérieux Inc, BD Diagnostics, and Qiagen Sciences Inc; grants from Affinity Biosensors, Qiagen, Hardy Diagnostics, and T2 Diagnostics; personal fees from Roche Diagnostics, Shionogi, and GeneCapture; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from GenMark Dx, OpGen Inc, and BD Diagnostics; a leadership or fiduciary role on the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Diagnostics Committee, CLSI AST Subcommittee, and CAP Microbiology Committee; stock options from GeneCapture, outside the submitted work. K. E. H. reports grants from BioFire Diagnostics and roles on the Infectious Diseases Society of America Board of Directors (CLIS Antifungal Susceptibility Committee), Clinical Infectious Diseases deputy editor, and JCM editor, outside the submitted work. R. P. reports grants from ContraFect, TenNor Therapeutics Limited, BioFire, and Adaptive Phage Therapeutics (paid to institution); is a consultant to Curetis, PathoQuest, Selux Diagnostics, 1928 Diagnostics, PhAST, Torus Biosystems, Day Zero Diagnostics, Mammoth Biosciences, HealthTrackRx, and Qvella (monies paid to Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic and R. P. have a relationship with Pathogenomix); has research supported by Adaptive Phage Therapeutics (Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics); is a consultant to Netflix, Abbott Laboratories, and CARB-X; has a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, and a patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued; receives honoraria from the NBME, Up-to-Date, and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course; reports travel reimbursement to author from ASM; and has a volunteer role on the Governance Committee of ASM. J. D. B. reports grants from Luminex Corporation, Abbott Molecular, Chromacode, and BioFire Diagnostics; is a consultant for Roche Diagnostics/GenMark, bioMérieux Inc, BioFire Diagnostics, and Qiagen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Thermo Fisher Scientific and Qiagen; payment for expert testimony from Lewis Rice; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Thermo Fisher Scientific; and a leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy groups, paid or unpaid, with ASM and AMP. J. K. J. reports personal fees as speaker from BioFire Diagnostics. C. D. is a scientific advisor for GeneCapture and Quidel; is on the Shionogi speaker's bureau; has received travel funds from ASM; receives honoraria for editorial work performed for the Clinical Microbiology Newsletter; reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from ASM and NYASM; reports consulting fees from Quidel, Shionogi, Cepheid, and BD; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Accelerate. L. W. has received consulting fees from Roche Molecular Systems, Shionogi, and Talis Biomedical; research funding from Accelerate Diagnostics, bioMérieux Inc/BioFire Diagnostics, Hardy Diagnostics, and Roche Molecular Systems; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from the American Society for Microbiology (budget for speaking). G. Y. reports grants or contracts paid to institution from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. All remaining authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are an emerging cause of serious infections with high associated mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment of S. maltophilia infections is complicated by intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobials, including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and some cephalosporins. Despite this, >90% of isolates are susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), which is front-line therapy for this organism. Side-effects of SXT include bone marrow suppression, which precludes its use for many neutropenic patients. In this population, levofloxacin (LEV), minocycline (MIN), ceftazidime (CAZ), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and tigecycline (TIG) are used as alternative therapies - all of which require testing to inform susceptibilities. The reference standard method for testing S. maltophilia is broth microdilution (BMD), but very few clinical laboratories perform reference BMD. Furthermore, interpretive criteria are not available for CIP or TIG for S. maltophilia , although generic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) MIC breakpoints are available for these drugs. We assessed performance of disk and gradient diffusion tests relative to BMD for 109 contemporary isolates of S. maltophilia Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV and MIN disk diffusion was 93%, 89%, and 95%, respectively. Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV, MIN and CAZ gradient strips was 98%, 85%, 93%, 71%, respectively by Etest (bioMerieux), and 98%, 83%, 99%, and 73%, by MTS (Liofilchem). CIP and TGC, two clinically valuable alternatives to SXT, did not demonstrate promising disk to MIC correlates using CLSI M100 P. aeruginosa or PK/PD breakpoints. Manual commercial tests perform well for S. maltophilia , with the exception of tests for LEV and CAZ, where high error rates were observed., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.)

In 2022, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) updated piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) breakpoints for Enterobacterales , based on substantial data suggesting that historical breakpoints did not predict treatment outcomes for TZP. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet adopted these breakpoints, meaning commercial manufacturers of antimicrobial susceptibility testing devices cannot obtain FDA clearance for the revised breakpoints. We evaluated the Phoenix (BD, Sparks, MD), MicroScan (Beckman Coulter, Sacramento, CA), and Vitek2 (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) TZP MICs compared to reference broth microdilution for a collection of 284 Enterobacterales isolates. Phoenix ( n  = 167 isolates) demonstrated 84.4% categorical agreement (CA), with 4.2% very major errors (VMEs) and 1.8% major errors (MEs) by CLSI breakpoints. In contrast, CA was 85.0% with 4.3% VMEs and 0.8% MEs for the Phoenix with FDA breakpoints. MicroScan ( n  = 55 isolates) demonstrated 80.0% CA, 36.4% VMEs, and 4.8% MEs by CLSI breakpoints and 81.8% CA, 44.4% VMEs, and 0.0% MEs by FDA breakpoints. Vitek2 ( n  = 62 isolates) demonstrated 95.2% CA, 6.3% VMEs, and 0.0% MEs by CLSI and 96.8% CA, 0.0% VMEs, and 2.2% MEs by FDA breakpoints. Overall, the performance of the test systems was not substantially different using CLSI breakpoints off-label than using on-label FDA breakpoints. However, limitations were noted with higher-than-desired VME rates (all three systems) and lower-than-desired CA (MicroScan and Phoenix). Laboratories should consider adoption of the revised CLSI breakpoints with automated test systems but be aware that some performance challenges exist for testing TZP on automated systems, regardless of breakpoints applied.

Pediatric oncology patients are at risk for poor outcomes with respiratory viral infections. Outcome data for COVID-19 in children and young adults with cancer are needed; data are sparse for obese/overweight and adolescent and young adult subgroups. We conducted a single center cohort study of COVID-19 outcomes in patients younger than 25 years with cancer. Candidate hospitalization risk factors were analyzed via univariable and multivariable analyses. Eighty-seven patients with cancer and COVID-19 were identified. Most were Hispanic/Latinx (n = 63, 72%). Forty-two (48%) were overweight/obese. Anticancer therapy included chemotherapy only (n = 64, 74%), chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T, n = 7), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT, n = 12), or CAR-T and HSCT (n = 4). There was no COVID-19 related mortality. Twenty-six patients (30%) required COVID-19 related hospitalization; 4 required multiple hospitalizations. Nine (10%) had severe/critical infection; 6 needed intensive care. COVID-19 resulted in anticancer therapy delays in 22 (34%) of 64 patients on active therapy (median delay = 14 days). Factors associated with hospitalization included steroids within 2 weeks prior to infection, lymphopenia, previous significant non-COVID infection, and low COVID-19 PCR cycle threshold value. CAR-T recipients with B-cell aplasia tended to have severe/critical infection (3 of 7 patients). A COVID-19 antibody response was detected in 14 of 32 patients (44%). A substantial proportion of COVID-19 infected children and young adults with cancer require inpatient management; morbidity may be high in B-cell immunodeficiency. However, a majority of patients can be taken through chemotherapy without prolonged therapy delays. Viral load is a potential outcome predictor in COVID-19 in pediatric cancer., (© 2022 UICC.)

The fusion (F) protein of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major target of immunoprophylactic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines. Recently reported mutations in F gene antigenic sites can vary among RSV types A and B. To further understand mutations in RSV F proteins, we performed subtyping and F gene sequencing on 400 RSV-positive respiratory samples collected at four pediatric hospitals within the United States from children under 2 years old between 2018 and 2020. RSV B was predominant in 2018-2019 and RSV A in 2019-2020 (55.5% and 85.5% respectively). Compared to the reference sequence, all RSV B samples had at least one antigenic polymorphism with the most changes at sites AM14/V (100%) and Ø (93.3%) followed by II (5.8%), IV (3.9%), and p27 (2.9%). The most frequent mutations among RSV B for AM14/V site were in L172Q (100%), S173L (100%), and K191R (95.2%) while for Ø site they were in I206M (93.3%) and Q209R (93.3%). Conversely, polymorphisms were observed in only 15.3% of RSV A samples overall, specifically at antigenic sites p27 (5.9%), IV (3.0%), II (2.5%), AM14/V (2.0%), I (2.0%), and Ø (0.5%). Among RSV A cases, T122A at p27 (n = 10) and S276N at II (n = 3) were the most common substitution sites. S276N at site II was found in both RSV types. Although polymorphisms in F proteins of RSV B were more common than those in RSV A samples, changes in both subtypes were observed in key F antigenic sites which could potentially impact the efficacy of mAb therapies and vaccines., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Bloodstream infection poses a significant medical emergency that necessitates timely administration of appropriate antibiotics. Standard laboratory workup for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) involves subculture of organisms from positive blood bottles followed by testing using broth microdilution; however, this process can take several days. The Accelerate Pheno Blood Culture panel (Pheno) provides rapid phenotypic testing of selected Gram-negative organisms directly from positive blood cultures. This has the potential to shorten the AST process to several hours and impact time to antimicrobial optimization and subsequent clinical outcomes; however, these metrics have not been assessed in pediatric populations. We retrospectively compared two patient cohorts with blood cultures positive for on-panel Gram-negative organisms: 82 cases tested by conventional AST methods, and 80 cases postintervention at our pediatric hospital. Susceptibility testing from the Pheno yielded 91.5% categorical agreement with a broth microdilution-based reference method with 7.4% minor error, 1.1% major error, and 0.1% very major error rates. The median time from blood culture positivity to AST decreased from 20.0 h to 9.7 h ( P  < 0.001), leading to an overall decrease in time from blood culture positivity to change in therapy from 36.0 h to 25.0 h ( P  < 0.001). There was no observed change in length of stay or 30-day mortality. Median duration on meropenem decreased from 64.8 h to 31.6 h ( P  = 0.04). We conclude the Pheno had accurate performance and that implementation allowed for faster AST reporting, improved time to optimal therapy, and decreased duration on meropenem in children.

The COVID pandemic has put a spotlight on laboratory medicine, showcasing how vital diagnostic testing is for society and the health care system. It has also brought to light and accelerated the critical shortage of trained and experienced laboratory personnel that has been felt for decades. The need for laboratory professionals is expected to grow by 11% between 2020 and 2030, a higher rate of growth than the overall average for all other health care occupations. Here, the background to this workforce shortage is reviewed. Some proposed actions to help address the issue are put forth, including increasing awareness of the medical laboratory science profession along with bolstering training opportunities and awareness of alternate routes to obtaining certification as a medical laboratory scientist. In addition, recent survey data specifically related to the employee shortages in microbiology are presented which demonstrate that 80% of microbiology laboratories have vacant positions and that filling these positions is challenging for a number of reasons, including a lack of qualified applicants.

Objectives/hypothesis: Children have higher rates of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections or milder courses of infection, and their carrier status may potentially impact viral transmission to those providing them care. The aim of this study is to compare the existing COVID-19 preoperative screening protocols to the detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles in surgical samples., Study Design: Cross-sectional study., Methods: We conducted a prospective study with consecutive convenience sampling of children undergoing adenoidectomy between January and April 2021. Total nucleic acid was extracted from adenoid tissue and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was conducted to test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles. Univariate logistic regression was used to summarize the effect size of variables of interest on the odds of having SARS-CoV-2 positive adenoid tissue., Results: Forty adenoid samples were collected and 11 (27.5%) had a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Patients with positive adenoids were older (11.8 vs. 7.9 years, odds ratio: 1.3, P = .01) and more likely to have had a positive nasopharyngeal swab in the previous 90 days (4/11 or 36% vs. 0)., Conclusion: These data are the first report on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 particles in pediatric adenoidectomy specimens, with a high percentage of patients showing evidence of viral particles within the adenoid. This finding calls in to question the utility of preoperative COVID screening protocols which have yet to be rigorously validated in asymptomatic patients and have the potential to delay patients' surgical care., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1665-1667, 2022., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Antistaphylococcal penicillins and cefazolin remain the primary treatments for infections with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). The cefazolin inoculum effect (CzIE) causes the cefazolin MIC to be elevated in proportion to the number of bacteria in the inoculum. The objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate the prevalence of the CzIE in North American MSSA isolates. Clinical MSSA isolates from six microbiology laboratories in the United States and one microbiology laboratory in Canada were screened for the CzIE by broth microdilution at a standard inoculum (~5 × 10 5 CFU/mL) and a high inoculum (~5 × 10 7 CFU/mL). Genome sequencing was performed to further characterize the MSSA isolates. The CzIE was present in 57/305 (18.6%) MSSA isolates, ranging from 0% to 27.9% across study sites. More of the CzIE-positive isolates (29.8%) had standard inoculum cefazolin MICs of 1.0 μg/mL than the CzIE-negative isolates did (3.2%) ( P  < 0.0001). Conversely, more CzIE-negative isolates (39.5%) had standard inoculum MICs of 0.25 μg/mL than the CzIE positive isolates did (5.3%) ( P  < 0.0001). The most common BlaZ β-lactamase types found in the CzIE-positive strains were type C (53.7%) and type A (44.4%). ST8 and ST30 were the most common sequence types among CzIE-positive isolates and correlated with BlaZ type C and A, respectively. The CzIE was present in up to a quarter of clinical MSSA isolates from North American clinical laboratories. Further studies to determine the impact of the presence of the CzIE on clinical outcomes are needed.

Though rapid antigen tests have historically problematic performance characteristics for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections such as influenza, they have attained an unprecedented level of use in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ease of use and scalability of rapid antigen tests has facilitated a democratization and scale of testing beyond anything reasonably achievable by traditional laboratory-based testing. In this chapter, we discuss the performance characteristics of rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection and their application to non-traditional uses beyond clinical diagnostic testing., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

SARS-CoV-2 was identified and diagnostic methods developed at an impressive speed due in great part to the wider use of molecular methods in 2019 compared with 2002 during the SARS pandemic. The development of rapid and novel molecular diagnostic assays, leveraging of the high adaptability of molecular tests, and the integration of SARS-CoV-2 genotyping into public health, clinical, and research laboratories have been some of the successes in SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing. The main challenges are related to regulatory hurdles, supply chain constraints, and laboratory preparation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged into a world of maturing pathogen genomics, with >2 million genomes sequenced at this writing. The rise of more transmissible variants of concern that affect vaccine and therapeutic effectiveness has led to widespread interest in SARS-CoV-2 evolution. Clinicians are also eager to take advantage of the information provided by SARS-CoV-2 genotyping beyond surveillance purposes. Here, we review the potential role of SARS-CoV-2 genotyping in clinical care. The review covers clinical use cases for SARS-CoV-2 genotyping, methods of SARS-CoV-2 genotyping, assay validation and regulatory requirements, clinical reporting for laboratories, and emerging issues in clinical SARS-CoV-2 sequencing. While clinical uses of SARS-CoV-2 genotyping are currently limited, rapid technological change along with a growing ability to interpret variants in real time foretell a growing role for SARS-CoV-2 genotyping in clinical care as continuing data emerge on vaccine and therapeutic efficacy., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections in the United States and are a major driver of antibiotic use, both appropriate and inappropriate, across healthcare settings. Novel UTI diagnostics are a strategy that might enable better UTI treatment. Members of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Laboratory Center and the Infectious Diseases Society of America Diagnostics Committee convened to envision ideal future UTI diagnostics, with a view towards improving delivery of healthcare, patient outcomes and experiences, and antibiotic use, addressing which types of UTI diagnostics are needed and how companies might approach development of novel UTI diagnostics., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Studies of household transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) focused on households with children are limited. We investigated household secondary attack rate (SAR), transmission dynamics, and contributing factors in households with children. Materials and Methods: In this prospective case-ascertained study in Los Angeles County, California, all households members were enrolled if ≥1 member tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Nasopharyngeal PCRs, serology, and symptom data were obtained over multiple visits. Results: A total of 489 individuals in 105 households were enrolled from June to December 2020. The majority (77.3%) reported a household annual income of <$50,000, and most (92.9%) were of Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity. Children <18 years old accounted for 46.9% index cases, of whom 45.3% were asymptomatic. Household index cases were predominantly children during low community transmission and adults during the high community transmission period (χ 2 = 7.647, p = 0.0036. The mean household SAR was 77.0% (95% CI: 69.4-84.6%). Child and adult index cases both efficiently transmitted SARS-CoV-2 within households [81.9%, (95% CI: 72.1-91.9%) vs. 72.4% (95% CI: 59.8-85.1%), p = 0.23]. Household income and pets were significantly associated with higher SAR in the multivariable analysis of household factors ( p = 0.0013 and 0.004, respectively). Conclusions: The SAR in households with children in an urban setting with a large ethnic minority population is much higher than previously described. Children play important roles as index cases. SAR was disproportionately impacted by household income. Vaccination and public health efforts need special focus on children and vulnerable communities to help mitigate SARS-CoV-2 spread., Competing Interests: PP has received consultant fees from Sanofi-Pasteur and Seqirus and also receives research funding from AstraZeneca and Pfizer for unrelated studies. AG has received consultant fees from Janssen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Tanaka, Marentes Ruiz, Malhotra, Turner, Peralta, Lee, Jumarang, Perez, Navarro, Dien Bard, Gordon, Allen, Thomas and Pannaraj.)

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia causes high-mortality infections in immunocompromised hosts with limited therapeutic options. Many U.S. laboratories rely on commercial automated antimicrobial susceptibility tests (cASTs) and use CLSI breakpoints (BPs) for S. maltophilia. However, contemporary data on these systems are lacking. We assessed performance of Vitek 2, MicroScan WalkAway, and Phoenix relative to that of reference broth microdilution for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), levofloxacin (LEV), minocycline (MIN), and ceftazidime (CAZ) with 109 S. maltophilia bloodstream isolates. Using CLSI breakpoints, categorical agreement (CA) was below 90% on all systems and drugs, with the exception of SXT by MicroScan (98.1%) and Phoenix (98.1%) and MIN by MicroScan (100%) and Phoenix (99.1%). For SXT, Vitek 2 yielded a 77.1% CA. LEV and CAZ CA ranged from 67% to 85%. Very major errors (VME) were >3% for SXT (MicroScan, Phoenix), LEV (MicroScan), and CAZ (all systems). Major errors (ME) were >3% for SXT (Vitek 2), LEV (Phoenix), and CAZ (MicroScan, Phoenix). Minor errors were >10% for CAZ and LEV on all systems. Data were analyzed with EUCAST pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic CAZ, LEV, ciprofloxacin (CIP), and tigecycline (TGC) breakpoints when possible. CA was <90% for all. VME were >3% for CAZ (all systems), LEV (MicroScan), and TGC (Vitek 2), and ME were >3% for LEV (MicroScan), CAZ (all systems), ciprofloxacin (Vitek 2 and MicroScan), and TGC (Vitek 2, Phoenix). Minor errors (MI) were >10% for all agents and systems, by EUCAST breakpoints with an intermediate category (LEV, CAZ, CIP). Laboratories should use caution with cASTs for S. maltophilia, as a high rate of errors may be observed.

Traditional culture-based methods for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria take 2 to 3 days on average. Syndromic molecular diagnostic panels have revolutionized clinical microbiology laboratories as they can simultaneously identify an organism and detect some of the most significant antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes directly from positive blood culture broth or from various specimen types (e.g., whole blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and respiratory specimens). The presence or absence of an AMR marker associated with a particular organism can be used to predict the phenotypic AST results to more rapidly guide therapy. Numerous studies have shown that genotypic susceptibility predictions by syndromic panels can improve patient outcomes. However, an important limitation of AMR marker detection to predict phenotype is the potential discrepancies that may arise upon performing phenotypic AST of the recovered organism in culture. The focus of this minireview is to address how clinical laboratories should interpret rapid molecular results from commercial platforms in relation to phenotypic AST. Stepwise approaches and solutions are provided to resolve discordant results between genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility results., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.)

Background: There is increasing concern that persistent infection of SARS-CoV-2 within immunocompromised hosts could serve as a reservoir for mutation accumulation and subsequent emergence of novel strains with the potential to evade immune responses., Methods: We describe three patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who were persistently positive for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Viral viability from longitudinally-collected specimens was assessed. Whole-genome sequencing and serological studies were performed to measure viral evolution and evidence of immune escape., Findings: We found compelling evidence of ongoing replication and infectivity for up to 162 days from initial positive by subgenomic RNA, single-stranded RNA, and viral culture analysis. Our results reveal a broad spectrum of infectivity, host immune responses, and accumulation of mutations, some with the potential for immune escape., Interpretation: Our results highlight the potential need to reassess infection control precautions in the management and care of immunocompromised patients. Routine surveillance of mutations and evaluation of their potential impact on viral transmission and immune escape should be considered., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interests S.D.B. has consulted for Regeneron, Sanofi, and Novartis on topics unrelated to this study. S.D.B., and K.R. have filed provisional patent applications related to serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. All other authors have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of plasma cell-free DNA has emerged as an attractive diagnostic modality allowing broad-range pathogen detection, noninvasive sampling, and earlier diagnosis. However, little is known about its real-world clinical impact as used in routine practice., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients for whom plasma mNGS (Karius test) was performed for all indications at 5 United States institutions over 1.5 years. Comprehensive records review was performed, and standardized assessment of clinical impact of the mNGS based on the treating team's interpretation of Karius results and patient management was established., Results: A total of 82 Karius tests were evaluated from 39 (47.6%) adults and 43 (52.4%) children and a total of 53 (64.6%) immunocompromised patients. Karius positivity rate was 50 of 82 (61.0%), with 25 (50.0%) showing 2 or more organisms (range, 2-8). The Karius test results led to positive impact in 6 (7.3%), negative impact in 3 (3.7%), and no impact in 71 (86.6%), and was indeterminate in 2 (2.4%). Cases with positive Karius result and clinical impact involved bacteria and/or fungi but not DNA viruses or parasites. In 10 patients who underwent 16 additional repeated tests, only 1 was associated with clinical impact., Conclusions: The real-world impact of the Karius test as currently used in routine clinical practice is limited. Further studies are needed to identify high-yield patient populations, define the complementary role of mNGS to conventional microbiological methods, and discern how best to integrate mNGS into current testing algorithms., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Testing efforts for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for health care workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to that of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. We prospectively collected paired NPS and saliva samples from a total of 300 unique adult and pediatric patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 32.2% (97/300) of the individuals using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo kit (Thermo Fisher). Performance of saliva and NPS was compared against the total number of positives regardless of specimen type. The overall concordances for saliva and NPS were 91.0% (273/300) and 94.7% (284/300), respectively. The values for positive percent agreement (PPA) for saliva and NPS were 81.4% (79/97) and 89.7% (87/97), respectively. Saliva yielded detection of 10 positive cases that were negative by NPS. For symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients not previously diagnosed with COVID-19, the performances of saliva and NPS were comparable (PPA, 82.4% versus 85.3%). The overall values for PPA for adults were 83.3% and 90.7% for saliva and NPS, respectively, with saliva yielding detection of 4 fewer cases than NPS. However, saliva performance for symptomatic adults was identical to NPS performance (PPA of 93.8%). With lower cost and self-collection capabilities, saliva can be an appropriate sample choice alternative to NPS for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.)