Ziya Köstereli, Bilal Kilic, Selin Duman, Yusuf Cakmak, Leyla Tatar Yıldırım, Yavuz Dede, Yusuf Dolen, Dicle Guc, A. Lale Doğan, Engin U. Akkaya, and Safacan Kolemen
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality for certain malignant (skin, head and neck, gastrointestinal, gynecological cancers), premalignant (actinic keratosis), and nonmalignant (psoriasis) indications. Broader acceptance by the medical community and applicability is hampered, at least in part, by the less than optimal photophysical characteristics of the porphyrin derivatives. This situation sparked a worldwide search for novel sensitizers leading to new compounds, some holding more promise than others. The primary cytotoxic agent involved in the photodynamic action is singlet oxygen (Dg), the efficient generation of which is linked invariably to the intersystem crossing (ISC) efficiency of the excited sensitizer. Most organic dyes have low triplet quantum yields, and in many recent candidates for photodynamic sensitizers, heavy atoms are incorporated into the structure as a strategy to improve spin–orbit coupling leading to facilitated intersystem crossing. While this approach seems fail-safe, incorporation of heavy atoms such as bromine, iodine, selenium, and certain lanthanides very often leads to increased “dark toxicity”. Unlike traditional chemotherapy agents, in principle, photodynamic therapy sensitizers themselves can be nontoxic, either at cellular or organ levels, even at relatively high concentrations. We have been interested in trying to find alternative ways of achieving increased intersystem crossing without the use of heavy atoms to minimize dark toxicity, turning our attention to the excitedstate properties of the sensitizers. Designing efficient photoinduced O2 generators requires that any existing operative fluorescence cycle of the fluorophore, which is through the S0!S1!S0 states, has to be perturbed so as to minimize or shut down the S1!S0 deactivation, and switch to the triplet surface once S1 is accessed. A general design principle for a favorable S1!T1 transition from an electronic structure viewpoint would in principle require the structural and electronic compatibility of the S1 and T1 states to surpass that of the S1–S0 pair. Once multiple electronic states come into play, quantum mechanical calculations providing a detailed understanding of the electronic structure are extremely helpful. Multi-configurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) techniques are the stateof-the-art computational chemistry approaches, when near degeneracies and excited states are considered. These methods may not reach chemical accuracy ( 2–3 kcalmol ) for computing total energies, but they are crucial for a qualitatively correct description of the excited states and are capable of providing a conceptually complete picture of the photophysics taking place. Therefore, we mainly employed a popular variant of MCSCF techniques; the complete active space SCF (CASSCF) method in combination with relatively large basis sets and different active spaces. Details of CASSCF calculations are provided in the Supporting Information. Our calculations on the parent Bodipy (4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4adiaza-s-indacene, Scheme 1) showed that natural orbital occupancies of the S1 state describe an open-shell singlet with essentially double (> 1.9) or zero (< 0.1) electrons for all orbitals except the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) that are singly occupied (see the Supporting Information, Figure S1). It is no surprise to observe a fluorophore with low triplet quantum yield to have an excited state that possesses only two orbitals with single occupancy. Hence, to achieve our goal of efficient switching to the triplet manifold, we have to access excited states that differ from the ones that arise from simple HOMO!LUMO transitions. Among multiply excited configurations, doubly substituted ones are particularly important in enhancing S1–T1 coupling as shown by the seminal work of Salem and Rowland and the following work by Michl. Thus, the substitutions should invoke a simultaneous two-electron excitation from the Scheme 1. Structure and numbering of the parent Bodipy compound. [*] Y. Cakmak, S. Kolemen, B. Kilic, Prof. Dr. E. U. Akkaya UNAM-Institute of Materials Science and Nanotechnology Bilkent University, Ankara, 06800 (Turkey) E-mail: eua@fen.bilkent.edu.tr