Search

The design, synthesis, and biochemical characterization of novel, irreversible, salvinorin A-derived ligands suitable as active state probes of the [kappa]-opioid receptor (KOR) targeted as the most potent naturally occurring hallucinogen are reported. The results provide direct evidence for the presence of a free cysteine in the agonist-bound state of the KOR and provide novel insights into the mechanism by which salvinorin A binds to and activates the KOR.

The oxidation of guanine to 5-carboxamido-5-formamido-2-iminohydantoin (2-Ih) is major transformation in the oxidation of the single-stranded DNA 5-mer d(TTGTT) by m-chloroperbenzoic acid (m-CPBA) and dimenthyldioxirane (DMDO) as a model for peracid oxidants and in the oxidation of the 5-base pair duplex d[(TTGTT).(AACAA)] with DMDO. The 2-Ih base is a pathway-specific lesion generated by peracids and other epoxidizing agents and can be used as a potential biomarker.

Difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) is a common technique for characterizing differential protein expression in quantitative proteomics. Usually a combination of enzymatic digestion and peptide analysis by mass spectrometry is used to identify differentially expressed proteins following separation and statistical analysis by DIGE. In this chapter, methods for gel spot picking, enzymatic digestion, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry (MS) for protein identification of DIGE-analyzed proteins are discussed. Two examples are given: first, a specific protein is used to test the sensitivity of the 2D DIGE/MALDI MS combination for protein quantification and identification, and second, several proteins with and without the labels typically used in DIGE are identified to demonstrate that these labels do not alter MS-based protein identification. Technical variations of protein gel spot preparation, in-gel digestion, and mass spectral protein identification are discussed.

Salvinorin A, the most potent naturally occurring hallucinogen, has attracted an increasing amount of attention since the kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) was identified as its principal molecular target by us [Roth, B. L., et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 11934-11939]. Here we report the design, synthesis, and biochemical characterization of novel, irreversible, salvinorin A-derived ligands suitable as active state probes of the KOR. On the basis of prior substituted cysteine accessibility and molecular modeling studies, C315(7.38) was chosen as a potential anchoring point for covalent labeling of salvinorin A-derived ligands. Automated docking of a series of potential covalently bound ligands suggested that either a haloacetate moiety or other similar electrophilic groups could irreversibly bind with C315(7.38). 22-Thiocyanatosalvinorin A (RB-64) and 22-chlorosalvinorin A (RB-48) were both found to be extraordinarily potent and selective KOR agonists in vitro and in vivo. As predicted on the basis of molecular modeling studies, RB-64 induced wash-resistant inhibition of binding with a strict requirement for a free cysteine in or near the binding pocket. Mass spectrometry (MS) studies utilizing synthetic KOR peptides and RB-64 supported the hypothesis that the anchoring residue was C315(7.38) and suggested one biochemical mechanism for covalent binding. These studies provide direct evidence of the presence of a free cysteine in the agonist-bound state of the KOR and provide novel insights into the mechanism by which salvinorin A binds to and activates the KOR.

Protocols are given for a variety of techniques used in protein identification of complexes, including identification of in-gel separated proteins and LC-MS/MS. Gels, staining procedures, and peptide extraction protocols that are compatible with mass spectrometry are described. The detection limits of the various staining procedures and their compatibility with mass spectrometry are discussed. The various mass spectrometric techniques used (MALDI-MS, MALDI-MS/MS, nanospray, and ESI/LC-MS/MS) are also described, along with an indication of the advantages and disadvantages of each, and when they would most appropriately be used. Common pitfalls associated with database searching are also discussed.