Search

An influence diagram (ID) is a method of graphical representation of uncertain knowledge, which can be employed to support decisions in health care using probabilistic reasoning. We aimed to describe the development of an ID to support the decision-making process in phase II at Cardiopulmonary and Metabolic Rehabilitation Program (CPMR). The development of the ID was carried out through the identification of relevant variables and their possible values, as well as the identification of details of each variable, in order to find a network structure that appropriately connects the nodes that represent the variables, with arcs linking acyclic graphs, and to build the graph using specialized knowledge and the conditional probability table for each node in the graph. In spite of the complexity of the interactions, the model obtained with the ID seems to contribute in the decision-making process in phase II CPMR, providing a second opinion to the health pratictioner and helping in diagnostic, therapeutic and decision-making processes, since it is useful in situations with non-linear modeling or with absent or uncertain information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: to develop a Navigation Program for cancer patients, based on the model proposed by The GW Cancer Institute at George Washington University, adapted to the reality of a Brazilian High Complexity Center in Oncology. Method: a convergent care research applied in the development of a patient navigation care process, based on the model proposed by George Washington University, adapted for a High Complexity Center in Oncology in Brazil. Phases of the Convergent Assistance Research: conception, instrumentation, scrutiny, analysis and interpretation. These were correlated with the stages of the Program Development Cycle. Scale designed to categorize patients into navigation levels, validated by the Delphi Technique, with 12 specialists. Results: in the diagnosis, patients with head and neck cancer were defined for inclusion in the Navigation Program. Planning and implementation took place simultaneously, allowing the basic formatting of the program and its processes to be designed. Navigation Needs Assessment Scale designed to select the patient to join the Program and determine the recommended support. The scale validation had a consensus index of 96.42%. Evaluation of the stages of the cycle occurred through the adapted Plan/Do/Check/Act cycle. Conclusion: a Navigation Program was developed adapted to the Brazilian reality, and attributions of the navigators were created. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]