Search

Early exclusive birth/lactating parent's own milk (B/LPOM) feeds have been associated with longer duration of B/LPOM use for infant feedings in healthy term and hospitalized preterm infants. This relationship has not been explored in infants undergoing neonatal surgery (surgical infants).To evaluate the relationship between early exclusive B/LPOM feeds and cumulative B/LPOM patterns during surgical infants' neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalization.A secondary cross-sectional analysis was performed using the electronic health record data of surgical infants admitted to a level IV NICU between January 2014 and March 2015. Multiple linear regression and Fisher's exact test were used to examine the associations between first NICU feed type and total percentage of diet composed of B/LPOM during NICU stay and continuation of any or exclusive B/LPOM feedings at NICU discharge, respectively.The analysis included 59 infants who required surgery for gastrointestinal, cardiac, or multisystem defects or pregnancy-related complications. Receipt of B/LPOM as the first NICU feed was associated with higher percentage of B/LPOM feeds ( P.001) throughout NICU stay, as well as continuation of any or exclusive B/LPOM feedings at NICU discharge ( P = .03).Early exclusive B/LPOM feeds may be an important predictor for continuation of any B/LPOM use throughout the NICU stay and at NICU discharge. Continued efforts to identify and address gaps in prenatal and postpartum lactation support for parents of surgical infants are needed.Powered studies are needed to corroborate these findings and to explore the potential impact of other factors on duration and exclusivity of B/LPOM use.https://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx .

Creating a supportive environment for breastfeeding mothers in the primary care setting has been shown to improve breastfeeding rates and duration. An important aspect of establishing a breastfeeding-friendly practice is to engage and educate health care providers. To increase consistency of breastfeeding care and interventions across a large primary care network, we established an Ambulatory Breastfeeding Consortium (ABC) focused on information sharing and discussion centered on care of breastfeeding and lactating families. The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted the need to share up-to-date education and guidance, and the importance of the role of primary care providers in breastfeeding support. The ABC has been effective in engaging primary care nurses and other clinicians and disseminating information while encouraging discussion on the importance of providing informed care to breastfeeding families. Although more breastfeeding-specific education is recommended for clinicians, the ABC serves as a model for primary care clinicians to improve their knowledge and provide support for families through education, shared experience, and awareness across many pediatric primary care network sites.

To describe lactation outcomes among of a cohort of mother-infant dyads in which the women had an individualized prenatal nutrition consultation intervention.Descriptive cohort study.A free-standing children's hospital with a center for fetal diagnosis and treatment and a specialized maternity unit.A total of 160 women who had prenatal nutrition consultations in 2014 to 2017 and gave birth to infants with known congenital anomalies and required intensive care after birth.We surveyed women regarding their lactation outcomes after the Breastfeeding Report Card metrics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and obtained permission to abstract demographic and clinical information from the setting's electronic health record. We analyzed data with standard descriptive statistics.Among the cohort, 86.9% (n = 139) of participants intended to provide human milk or combination feeding in the prenatal period. A total of 128 (92.1%) infants were first exposed to human milk enterally. At the time of discharge, 92.1% (n = 128) of the infants received human milk. The breastfeeding outcomes of the cohort significantly surpassed national data: initiation (98.1% vs. 84.1% national), breastfeeding at 3 months (89.4%), exclusive breastfeeding at 3 months (60% vs. 46.9% national), breastfeeding at 6 months (76.9% vs. 58.3% national), exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months (45% vs. 25.6% national), breastfeeding at 12 months (50.6% vs. 35.3% national), and breastfeeding beyond 12 months (34.4%).Lactation outcomes among women who had prenatal nutrition consultations far surpassed national data, and this intervention has implications for family-centered prenatal care, informed decision making, and improved breastfeeding outcomes in the hospital setting and postdischarge.

The opportunity to establish a direct breastfeeding (DBF) relationship with a preterm infant, if desired by the mother or lactating parent, is a known driver of positive healthcare experiences. Preterm birth is an independent risk factor for early human milk (HM) cessation, and DBF at the first oral meal promotes continued DBF during hospitalization and HM duration beyond discharge. While the Spatz 10-step model for protecting and promoting HM and breastfeeding in vulnerable infants provides best practices, lack of standardized implementation results in missed opportunities to meet parents' DBF goals.To standardize clinical practices to increase DBF at the first oral meal, total DBF meals during hospitalization, and use of test weighing to measure milk transfer for preterm infants.Quality improvement methods were used to develop and implement Encourage, Assess, Transition (EAT): a DBF protocol for infants less than 37 weeks gestation at birth, in a level II neonatal intensive care unit.Thirty-eight (45%) infants from 27.7 to 36.7 weeks of gestation initiated the protocol. The proportion of infants' DBF at first oral meal increased from 22% to 54%; mean DBF meals during hospitalization increased from 13.3 to 20.3; and use of test weighing increased by 166%.Standardizing DBF practices with the EAT protocol increased DBF during hospitalization-a known driver of patient experience-and HM duration beyond discharge, in hospitalized preterm infants. Researchers should validate the reported benefits of EAT (increased DBF during hospitalization, use of test weighing, and improved patient experience), methods to promote passive dissemination of evidence, and sustain change.Video abstract available at: https://journals.na.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/pages/videogallery.aspx?autoPlay=falsevideoId=61.

This case study presents a mother who was able to maintain exclusive breastfeeding after having an infant who experienced growth failure between the two- and four-month pediatric primary care visits. This mother was exclusively breastfeeding her child and the infant was noted to “fall off the growth curve” at the four-month infant pediatric visit. At this point the mother was advised to formula feed her infant. The mother did not want to give formula and sought out assistance from the first author who connected the mother with an advance practice nurse at the pediatric site. By working with a nurse practitioner to develop an individualized feeding plan, the mother's breastfeeding relationship was able to be maintained and the infant gained weight. Despite receiving initial recommendations to formula feed her child, we were able to work beyond those recommendations by providing evidence based breastfeeding interventions and support. A breastfeeding assessment is an important factor in each wellness visit.

In this report, we describe a case of bilateral lactational mastitis in a primigravid, Spanish-speaking woman who exclusively pumped breast milk for a hospitalized, critically ill infant in the NICU within a free-standing children's hospital. The case follows her clinical presentation, assessments, diagnostics, and therapeutic interventions during the 45-day postpartum period. This case report highlights the situational and environmental context of the woman's experiences and emphasizes potential disconnections of care. Regarding her mastitis, the maternity care providers relied on the woman to provide all relevant information without knowledge of her hospitalized infant's health status. Traditionally during the postpartum period, infants hospitalized in the NICU and their mothers are cared for by separate provider teams. Clinicians must acknowledge that when women transition from recent patients to parent visitors after birth, they will likely have ongoing medical, obstetric, and psychosocial care needs.

Objective To explore the practice of antenatal milk expression (AME) and related outcomes for mother–infant dyads during the first 2 weeks after birth. Data Sources We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Emcare, Maternity & Infant Care Database, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant literature. We also conducted backward reference searches on relevant publications and nondatabase searches after review of the full texts. Study Selection Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported primary studies focused on AME, included samples of mother–infant dyads, and were published in English. We did not impose time or design limitations given the sparse availability of literature on AME. We identified 766 articles. After the removal of duplicates, we screened 588 articles, and of these, we included 15 articles in our review. Data Extraction We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to guide data extraction and reporting. We evaluated the quality of evidence using the Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt rating system and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data Synthesis We synthesized data from the included articles into four themes: Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy, Milk Supply, Infant Well-Being, and Infant Feeding Methods. Conclusion AME may support breastfeeding by improving breastfeeding self-efficacy and milk supply and by decreasing early formula use. Synthesized literature on AME shows the safety of the practice and that infants of women who practice AME have a greater likelihood of breastfeeding exclusivity during the short term.

Background Antenatal milk expression is a milk expression intervention beginning at either 36 or 37 weeks of gestation for the purpose of potential colostrum collection and storage prior to birth for postnatal infant feeding. Research on antenatal milk expression is limited and originates outside the United States. Methods Women who used antenatal milk expression were interviewed about their experiences. A conventional, inductive approach to qualitative content analysis was used to analyze participants' responses. Results Three women participated in interviews. They reported learning and performing antenatal milk expression for various postpartum needs including avoidance of formula, milk available for potential infant hypoglycemia, and to support human milk feeding during surrogate mother-infant separation. These mothers obtained education and information on antenatal milk expression primarily on their own. Clinical implications Greater awareness and understanding of antenatal milk expression is needed in the professional community caring for childbearing women. Perinatal nurses need to be aware of all breastfeeding practices including antenatal milk expression. Knowledge of the practice and advocacy for more research on antenatal milk expression will improve lactation support and ensure expectant mothers reach their personal breastfeeding goals.

The use of human milk and breastfeeding is a lifesaving medical intervention for infants who are cared for in intensive care units at birth. Despite modest increases in breastfeeding initiation rates in the United States, exclusive human milk rates at 6 months continue to be only approximately 25%. Health care providers must be aware of disparities in breastfeeding rates with many low-income groups and persons of color. The Spatz 10-step model for human milk and breastfeeding in vulnerable infants has been implemented throughout the United States and the world. Key components include, but are not limited to, informed decision-making, establishment and maintenance of milk supply, oral care and feeding of human milk, preparation for discharge, and appropriate follow-up. Breastfeeding has been reported to positively impact mood and stress reactivity, and it can help facilitate maternal sensitivity and secure attachment between mother and infant compared to formula feeding. In this chapter, parental mood and anxiety symptoms related to feeding are explored, and the role of the provision of human milk as a positive intervention strategy is discussed. The entire multidisciplinary team should be involved in helping parents meet their personal goals for the provision of human milk and breastfeeding.

In the United States, there are racial disparities in 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding. Only, 25.8% of American infants were breastfed for the first 180 days of life, with African American infants least (19.8%) exclusively breastfed in 2018.The meta-ethnography explored the breastfeeding support for African American women in the United States.The online databases of American Psychological Association, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, and Scopus were searched with key words, and the search was not limited by the year of publication.The inclusion criteria for the study selection entailed all qualitative studies conducted on breastfeeding support among self-identified African American women in the United States, written in English language, peer reviewed, or dissertation. The initial search produced 905 articles of which 8 met the eligibility criteria.Data extraction and analysis were guided by Noblit and Hare's (1988) meta-ethnography approach. The analysis process was completed by a team of researchers, inclusive of breastfeeding experts.Five overarching themes emerged including trustworthy information; early postpartum support by key influencers; maternal culture; tangible resources, and Black mothers' empowerment.Social support is a major determinant for the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding among African American women in the United States. Future longitudinal studies are warranted to explore the social support of breastfeeding among African American women in the United States.

This paper describes how, as the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, one hospital-based center for nursing research and evidence-based practice capitalized on its unique skill mix to quickly pivot to provide hospital administrators and staff with timely, relevant evidence regarding the care of patients and families, as well as the protection of direct care providers and all support staff. The products produced by this center, both proactive and in direct response, contributed to clinical operations decision-making and thus, tangibly impacted practice. The positive outcomes described speak not only to the clinical environment, but also to the presence and specialized contributions of a multiprofessional center for nursing research and evidence-based practice in such a way that was not possible prior to COVID-19.

For new families giving birth in a hospital setting, the COVID-19 pandemic has presented numerous challenges to their birth, breastfeeding, and postpartum experiences. We present experiences of three first-time, healthy mothers and their babies, as they gave birth in the hospital and were breastfeeding during the start of the pandemic in Philadelphia, PA. Each case is framed in the mother's prenatal goals, infant feeding intentions, birth, breastfeeding, and postpartum experiences. Shared concerns and experiences among the three participants are described in five key areas: 1) Recommendations changing every day, 2) Guilt, concern, and stress, 3) In-person versus telehealth visits, 4) Missing time with family and friends, and 5) Silver linings. Through these mothers' experiences, nurses and other health care providers can learn from their perceptions and events and proactively work to ensure we provide sound anticipatory guidance, enhance our communication, and improve provision of evidence-based lactation care and support.

There are many factors that can negatively impact a mother developing a copious milk supply and being able to exclusively breastfeed her infant. In this article, we present two case exemplars (glandular hypoplasia and breast reduction surgery) to illustrate that not all mothers may be able to develop a full milk supply, and that families should receive appropriate prenatal anticipatory education and guidance from childbirth educators and all health-care providers. Important considerations include the value of every drop of milk that the mother is able to produce, treating the milk as an important medical intervention, and developing a plan with the family for supplementation so the infant can receive adequate intake for growth.

The objective of this integrative review was to assess birth and postpartum doulas' roles in supporting breastfeeding initiation and duration. The electronic databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, PubMed, and Scopus were searched using the key terms doula and breastfeeding. Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria. Six key themes were identified. Doulas may acquire only modest amounts of lactation-specific education; however, doula care still enhances the breastfeeding care provided by health-care professionals. Doulas offer prenatal and intrapartum support that encourages breastfeeding initiation in the hospital, as well as providing breastfeeding support in the community and home settings. This reinforces the unique role of the doula in bolstering maternal–infant health. The effect of doulas on breastfeeding duration is less clear.

Human milk/breastfeeding is the gold standard for infant nutrition. Interventions in pediatric primary care could improve breastfeeding exclusivity and duration. Our specific aims were two-fold: 1) Accurately measure breastfeeding indicators and 2) Implement AAP Breastfeeding-Friendly Pediatric Office Practice Recommendations.In 2018, a single, urban, large primary care pediatric practice initiated a Quality Improvement project to improve breastfeeding outcomes. Stakeholders met to discuss metrics of interest, develop documentation templates, review data capture, and plan interventions to support breastfeeding. Practice based interventions to improve measurement included: piloting documentation templates, incorporation of default templates office-wide, and developing tracking tools for both use of templates and breastfeeding outcomes. Interventions to support breastfeeding occurred simultaneously and included workflow redesign to increase nurse-provided breastfeeding education, partnering with community-based lactation consultants for outpatient support, staff education, and National Breastfeeding Month activities.Since initiation of the data analytic tool, breastfeeding data has been analyzed from over 30,000 visits (86% Medicaid-insured, 82% Black race). Currently, 80% of providers use default templates that allow standardized data capture. At first newborn visit, 74% of infants were breastfed. At six months, 36% of infants were breastfed; 23% exclusively. Standardized documentation of infant feeding status improved and has remained consistent. Breastfeeding duration did not significantly improve despite practice interventions.Pediatric primary care measurement tools are feasible and critical to understand breastfeeding continuation. Increased resources and interventions to support breastfeeding in Primary Care are necessary to improve outcomes.

Human milk has repeatedly been shown to be the best form of infant nutrition. Many reasons may prevent a family from providing human milk to their child, leaving them to seek other options. One alternative is informal milk sharing, where individuals and families find donor milk through online communities. We present perspectives from three mothers who used informal milk sharing for at least 6 months. Common themes identified are sadness, guilt, and stigmatization of informal milk sharing. Implications for practice include providing families and practitioners with resources for learning about informal milk sharing and navigating the community safely.

Introduction: MamaCare is an adaptation of the CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care model designed to support women when the pregnancy has been complicated by the presence of known congenital ano...

Background Infants are subjected to painful procedures as part of routine care. Evidence suggests human milk (HM) has pain-relieving qualities; however, nurses may not be aware of this evidence. Purpose This article presents the evidence for HM and breastfeeding for pain management, as well as describes using the evidence to create an interprofessional enterprise-wide policy on the topic. Methods/search strategy Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL, and Medline were searched for full-length articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2012 and 2020. Articles using HM as an independent variable during a painful procedure, or discussing benefits of HM for pain management, were analyzed. Findings/results Ten articles were selected for evaluating use of HM for pain relief in term and preterm infants. There is statistically significant evidence that expressed HM has pain-relieving abilities, especially when combined with other soothing interventions such as rocking. HM reduces crying time, and lowers pain scores during painful procedures. Seven articles recommend breastfeeding for effective pain management. Breastfeeding reduces crying time, heart rate, and pain scores compared with oral sucrose, holding, nonnutritive sucking, swaddling, and topical anesthetics. Implications for practice Breastfeeding and HM should be offered as primary pain management options. Having an interprofessional enterprise-wide policy for the use of breastfeeding and HM for pain management during painful procedures, such as vaccination, will provide safe, effective pain management. Implications for research Further understanding of effective HM dosing for pain management and use of pasteurized donor HM in place of expressed HM is required.

The leadership team at the Center for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University in Tokyo, Japan sought to improve our human milk (HM) and breastfeeding rates for vulnerable infants. This article describes the quality improvement (QI) initiative, which involved the implementation of the first three steps of the Spatz 10-step model for HM and breastfeeding in vulnerable infants. Our main objectives were to ensure that: (1) families were making informed feeding decisions about HM and breastfeeding as a medical intervention; (2) mothers were pumping early and often; (3) the staff implemented HM management; and (4) the proportion of infants who received HM at 1 month of life increased. Using a QI approach led by a nursing team, we were able to achieve all our goals. Our prenatal education was effective at having more families choose HM and breastfeeding versus formula. Our time to first milk expression improved as did the mothers' adherence with pumping early and often. We purchased physical resources to ensure that all milk was efficiently delivered to the infant in appropriate storage containers. At the initiation of this QI project, exclusive HM rates at discharge were only 15%. In only a 4 months time frame, the HM rate at discharge increased threefold to 47%. During the entire year, the portion of mothers selecting formula continued to decrease and HM rates continued to rise.

BACKGROUND: Kangaroo Care (KC), or skin-to-skin care, occurs when an infant is dressed in a diaper and held to a parent’s bare chest. This form of holding has been shown to have many benefits for hospitalized infants and has been shown to be a safe and feasible intervention to support infants with congenital heart disease. Despite known benefits, KC was not implemented routinely and consistently in our cardiac center for infants with congenital heart disease. The purpose of this project was to support use of KC as a nursing intervention for hospitalized infants with congenital heart disease and their parents. METHODS: A KC quality improvement committee formed to develop strategies to increase frequency of KC, including the creation of a new nursing policy and procedure on KC for infants, adaptation of the electronic health record to facilitate KC documentation, provide education, and promote translation of KC into practice through the cardiac center’s first Kangaroo-A-Thon. RESULTS: Twenty-six nurses initiated KC 43 times with 14 patients over the eight-week period for the Kangaroo-A-Thon. No adverse events were reported as a result of infants being held by their parents in KC. CONCLUSION: Our local initiative provided preliminary evidence that KC can be safely integrated into standard care for hospitalized infants with congenital heart disease. Formal standards and procedures, along with creative initiatives such as a Kangaroo-A-Thon, can be a first step towards fostering the translation of KC into practice.

The process of human milk donation and sharing for the promotion of infant health is a phenomenon of interest as it directly affects children's health and well-being. Although its prevalence is currently unknown, informal sharing of human milk is occurring across the United States. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends against informal sharing of human milk. However, the Ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) Orthodox Jewish population, who strictly observes Jewish laws and often consults with rabbis before making medical decisions, is known to donate and obtain milk through informal sharing. The objective of this study was to explore the lived experience of informal donation from the perspective of Ultra-Orthodox mothers from the Northeastern region of the United States who engaged in milk sharing to support hospitalized at-risk infants. Women were interviewed by an Orthodox Jewish member of the team, using a semistructured interview guide. Informal milk sharing was regarded as a positive empowering experience. Themes which illuminate the phenomena of milk sharing include faith, mistrust of the medical establishment, a strong reliance on social connectedness, and importance of sacred cultural traditions. Health care providers need to be aware of these specific needs to provide culturally sensitive care for safer milk sharing practices in cloistered and faith-based communities.

Prenatal education may improve breastfeeding outcomes among low-income women. Our objective was to assess breastfeeding intentions and knowledge among women participating in doula-facilitated prenatal education classes from August 2016 to October 2017. Breastfeeding knowledge and infant feeding intentions were assessed before and after the classes. Breastfeeding rates were assessed at birth, 2–4 weeks postpartum, and 6–8 weeks postpartum. Paired t-tests tests were conducted. A total of 121 racially diverse, low-income women were enrolled. Intentions to breastfeed increased pre- to post-intervention (p = 0.007). Breastfeeding knowledge scores increased pre- to post-intervention (p

The healthcare system is being challenged in the United States and worldwide due to the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, all through this pandemic, families will continue to birth children. Childbirth educators play a particularly important role in ensuring that families receive appropriate evidence-based information about human milk and breastfeeding as a lifesaving medical intervention. In the current COVID-19 crisis, breastfeeding and the provision of human milk remains recommended by national and international organizations.

Background Choosing to breastfeed is a decision with far-reaching benefits; strengthened immune systems, all-encompassing nutrition, and fostering healthy attachment. For these and other reasons, some mothers are reluctant to wean their child due to a subsequent pregnancy. Mothers may breastfeed throughout their second pregnancy, give birth to their second child, and simultaneously breastfeed two children. This practice is known as tandem breastfeeding. Purpose We explore the biological and emotional considerations of tandem breastfeeding and offer practical suggestions for nurses. Methods Three mothers who engaged in tandem breastfeeding were identified and interviewed. Interviews were face-to-face or over the phone. One researcher conducted all interviews using the same questions that served as the foundation and guidance for the discussion-based interview. The interviews lasted 40 to 60 minutes and were audio recorded to minimize recall issues during data analysis. Results Three mothers shared their tandem breastfeeding journeys, challenges faced, and overall perspectives. This was an opportunity for mothers to share feedback on how nurses provided education and care as well as suggestions for nursing care of future mothers who choose to tandem breastfeeding. Clinical implications Through research and case-series interviews, we developed implications for nursing practice. Nurses must be informed and supportive of mothers' decisions to tandem breastfeed.

Introduction: Childbearing women with primary or secondary Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 infection are at risk of transmitting neonatal herpes infection to their infants; a medical emergency that is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Neonatal herpes infection has been commonly associated with Herpes Simplex Virus type 2, or genital herpes, but can be caused by either subtype and the presentations are indistinguishable. This case describes the course of diagnosis, treatment, and recovery for a mother and infant during a severe maternal and neonatal herpes infection, and how lactation was maintained and breastfeeding re-established. Our children’s hospital coordinated its efforts to assist and monitor this breastfeeding family, and they were able to resume breastfeeding soon after discharge. It is our opinion that it is imperative that mothers receive evidence-based lactation care to maintain their breastfeeding relationship during extended hospital stays. Main Issue: An acutely ill infant was admitted to our urban children’s hospital with severe neonatal herpes infection for a total of 3 weeks. His mother was severely affected on her breasts and she required a brief hospitalization. The mother’s breasts were covered with draining herpetic lesions that required daily dressing changes. However, her lesions were slow to heal, and a wound care consultation was facilitated and her treatment plan was adjusted. We were surprised that she experienced minimal discomfort with pumping and dressing changes. The mother maintained a positive outlook, complied with the plan to express frequently to maintain milk production, and was able to breastfeed again when they both recovered. Management: This mother received immediate support and appropriate pumping equipment from our hospital personnel and was subsequently able to establish and maintain her milk supply. The difficulty in this case was the management of the mother’s extensive herpetic wounds that were slow to heal. A certified wound care specialist was required. Both mother and child recovered from their infections and were able to restart breastfeeding; eventually reaching their goal of breastfeeding for 2 years. Conclusions: Neonatal herpes infection is a potentially fatal disease and maternal child health professionals should have a high suspicion for any ill-appearing newborn with or without a rash. When a breastfeeding infant and mother become infected with Herpes Simplex Virus type 1, it is the responsibility of the healthcare institution to support lactation and the return to breastfeeding rather than recommend cessation of lactation, which is rarely necessary. A multi-disciplinary evidence-based approach to lactation care is essential to preserve lactation during infant hospitalization.