Search

Objective This study aims at evaluating the cost-of-illness (COI) of patients diagnosed with Behcet’s syndrome (BS) in Italy, trying to depict the impact of different costs’ components to the overall economic burden and analysing the variability of costs according to years since diagnosis and age at first symptoms. Methods With a cross-sectional evaluation, we surveyed a large sample of BS patients in Italy assessing several dimensions related to BS, also including fact related to the use of health resources utilization, formal and informal care, and productivity losses. Overall costs, direct health, direct non-health, and indirect costs were thus estimated per patient/year considering a Societal perspective and the impact of years since diagnosis, age at first symptoms on costs was evaluated using generalized linear model (GLM) and a two-part model, adjusting for age and distinguishing among employed and non-employed responders. Results A total of 207 patients were considered in the present study. From the perspective of the Society, mean overall costs for BS patient were estimated to be 21,624 € (0;193,617) per patient/year. Direct non-health expenses were the main costs component accounting for 58% of the overall costs, followed direct health costs, 36%, while indirect costs because of productivity losses represented 6% of the overall costs. Being employed resulted in significantly lower overall costs (p = 0.006). Results from the multivariate regression analyses suggested that the probability of incurring in overall costs equal to zero decreased as time from BS diagnosis is 1 year or more as compared to newly diagnosed patients (p p = 0.027) or later (p = 0.032) as compared to those having symptoms earlier. Similar findings emerged among the subgroups of patients declaring themselves as workers, while no impact of years since diagnosis or age of first symptoms was found among non-workers. Conclusions The present study offers a comprehensive overview of the economic consequences imposed by BS in a societal perspective, providing insights into the distribution of the different costs component related to BS, thus helping the development of targeted policies.

The assessment of quality of life (QoL) in Behçet's disease (BD) patients has been a surrogate of disease outcomes, but a wider impact on the patient's lifestyle has not been considered. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the existing tools specifically adopted to explore the QoL in BD patients.A systematic literature review was conducted using 2 electronic databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A combination of BD and QoL-related search terms were used. All articles were screened by 3 independent reviewers for title, abstract and full text level. Studies investigating QoL in BD patients were included.64 papers of 497 records were retained. Data about 7,449 patients with a BD diagnosis and QoL evaluation were collected. 47 different tools to evaluate QoL were detected. The mean number of tools adopted in each study was 2.14±1.34. General QoL and psychological and social impact were investigated in 68.75% and 54.69% respectively. The correlation with disease activity was investigated in 71.86%.The assessment of QoL in BD patients may provide a fundamental measurement for health to evaluate the outcome of interventions for BD patients. The adoption of a single validated QoL tool, developed including the BD patient's perspective, may provide an accurate and effective assessment, ensure the comparison within different cohorts, and set standardised values to define QoL level in BD patients.

ObjectiveThe aim of this work is to explore patient’ unmet needs of rare and complex rheumatic tissue diseases (rCTDs) patients during pregnancy and its planning by means of the narrative-based medicine (NBM) approach.MethodsA panel of nine rCTDs patients’ representatives was identified to codesign a survey aimed at collecting the stories of rCTD patients who had one or more pregnancies/miscarriages. The results of the survey and the stories collected were analysed and discussed with a panel of patients’ representatives to identify unmet needs, challenges and possible strategies to improve the care of rCTD patients.Results129 replies were collected, and 112 stories were analysed. Several unmet needs in the management of pregnancy in rCTDs were identified, such as fragmentation of care among different centres, lack of education and awareness on rCTD pregnancies among midwifes, obstetricians and gynaecologists. The lack of receiving appropriate information and education on rCTDs pregnancy was also highlighted by patients and their families. The need for a holistic approach and the availability specialised pregnancy clinics with a multidisciplinary organisation as well as the provision of psychological support during all the phases around pregnancy was considered also a priority.ConclusionThe adoption of the NBM approach enabled a direct identification of unmet needs, and a list of possible actions was elaborated to improve the care of rCTD patients and their families in future initiatives.

In order to address the main challenges related to the rare diseases (RDs) the European Commission launched the European Reference Networks (ERNs), virtual networks involving healthcare providers (HCPs) across Europe. The mission of the ERNs is to tackle low prevalence and RDs that require highly specialised treatment and a concentration of knowledge and resources. In fact, ERNs offer the potential to give patients and healthcare professionals across the EU access to the best expertise and timely exchange of lifesaving knowledge, trying to make the knowledge travelling more than patients. For this reason, ERNs were established as concrete European infrastructures, and this is particularly crucial in the framework of rare and complex diseases in which no country alone has the whole knowledge and capacity to treat all types of patients. It has been five years since their kick-off launch in Vilnius in 2017. The 24 ERNs have been intensively working on different transversal areas, including patient management, education, clinical practice guidelines, patients' care pathways and many other fundamental topics. The present work is therefore aimed not only at reporting a summary of the main activities and milestones reached so far, but also at celebrating the first 5 years of the ERN on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculo-skeletal Diseases (ReCONNET), in which the members of the network built together one of the 24 infrastructures that are hopefully going to change the scenario of rare diseases across the EU.

ObjectiveTo map existing organizational care pathways in clinical centers of expertise that care for pregnant women affected by rare and complex connective tissue diseases (rcCTDs).MethodsAn international working group composed of experts in the field of pregnancy in rcCTDs co-designed a survey focused on organizational aspects related to the patient's pathway before, during, and after pregnancy. The survey was distributed to subject experts through referral sampling.ResultsAnswers were collected from 69 centers in 21 countries. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome were followed by more than 90% of centers, whereas those with disorders such as IgG4-related diseases were rarely covered. In the majority of centers, a multidisciplinary team was involved, including an obstetrician/gynecologist in 91.3% of cases and other healthcare professionals less frequently. Respondents indicated that 96% of the centers provided routine pre-pregnancy care, whereas the number of patient visits during pregnancy varied across centers. A formalized care pathway was described in 49.2% of centers, and 20.3% of centers had a predefined protocol for the monitoring of pregnant patients. Access to therapies during pregnancy also was heterogeneous among different centers.ConclusionIn international referral centers, a high level of care is provided to patients with rcCTDs before, during, and after pregnancy. No significant discrepancies were found between European and non-European countries. However, this work highlights a potential benefit to streamlining the care approaches across countries to optimize pregnancy and perinatal outcomes among patients with rcCTDs.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to provide high-level care for a large number of patients with COVID-19 has affected resourcing for, and limited the routine care of, all other conditions. The impact of this health emergency is particularly relevant in the rare connective tissue diseases (rCTDs) communities, as discussed in this Perspective article by the multi-stakeholder European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ERN ReCONNET). The clinical, organizational and health economic challenges faced by health-care providers, institutions, patients and their families during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak have demonstrated the importance of ensuring continuity of care in the management of rCTDs, including adequate diagnostics and monitoring protocols, and highlighted the need for a structured emergency strategy. The vulnerability of patients with rCTDs needs to be taken into account when planning future health policies, in preparation for not only the post-COVID era, but also any possible new health emergencies., In this Perspective article, members of the European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases discuss clinical and organizational challenges in this community caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and what lessons might be learned for the future.

IntroductionThe European Reference Network (ERN) ReCONNET is the ERN aimed at improving the management of rare and complex connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases (rCTDs) across the European Union (EU). In the mission of ERN ReCONNET, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) play a crucial role, representing a valid tool towards the harmonisation of the management of rCTDs while improving effectiveness and quality of care delivered to patients.MethodsERN ReCONNET developed two surveys to map the adherence to rCTDs CPGs among healthcare providers and to assess the knowledge and awareness of CPGs for their diseases among patients, family members and caregivers.ResultsThe results of the surveys highlighted that healthcare professionals find it useful to apply CPGs in clinical practice (93%), while 62% of them experience difficulties and barriers in the application in their centres. Healthcare professionals also highlighted the need to develop CPGs for all rCTDs and to implement the use of the existing CPGs in clinical practice. On the other hand, patients, families and caregivers are relatively aware of the purpose of CPGs (51%) and 62% of them were aware of the existence of CPGs for their disease. Patient-friendly versions of CPGs and patients’ lifestyle guidelines should be systematically developed contributing to the empowerment of patients in the disease management.ConclusionERN ReCONNET is addressing the main issues identified in the results of the survey, promoting practical actions for the local adaptation of CPGs across Europe, improving their routine clinical use and increasing the awareness on CPGs among rCTDs patients, family members and caregivers.

Background In 2017, the European Commission has launched the European Reference Networks (ERNs), virtual networks involving healthcare providers across Europe. The aim of the ERNs is to tackle complex and rare diseases and conditions that require highly specialized treatment and a concentration of knowledge and resources. The ERN on rare and complex connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases (ERN ReCONNET) is one of the 24 ERNs approved that aims to improve the management of Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases. Objective The RarERN Path methodology aims to create a single reference organisational model for patients’ care pathways which, if applied in different contexts, helps to ensure an improved, cost-effective and patient-centred equal care to rare and complex diseases. Methods Starting from existing standard methods for the creation and elaboration of patients’ care pathways, a specific methodology was created in order to take advantage of the distinctive and peculiar characteristics of the ERNs. Specifically, the development of the RarERN Path methodology involved different stakeholders: health economists, clinicians and researchers expert in rare and complex diseases, communication experts, experts in patients’ involvement and narrative medicine and policy-makers. Results The RarERN Path methodology foresees six consecutive phases, each with different and specific aims. Specifically, the six phases are represented by: Phase 1—mapping of existing patients’ care pathways and patients’ stories; Phase 2—design of an optimised common patients’ care pathway; Phase 3—consensus on an optimised common patients’ care pathway; Phase 4—key performance indicators definition; Phase 5—refinement; Phase 6—pilot phase (optional). Conclusion The application of RarERN Path to the different disease-specific and geographical contexts would help to ensure an improved, cost-effective and patient-centred equal care to rare and complex diseases across Europe as well as a possible tangible action towards the integration of ERNs into the different European healthcare systems.

Aim: The European Reference Networks (ERNs) provide clinicians and patients the opportunity to collaborate at EU level to improve diagnosis, care and treatment for people living with rare and complex conditions. However, building a partnership culture to systematically involve patients in ERN activities and decision-making structures is challenging, partly because the role of patient representatives and the value of this collaboration are not always understood. The objective of this project was to develop an evaluation framework to assess the impact of patient engagement in the ERNs and to provide evidence on the value of patient-clinician partnership. Methods: The evaluation was developed by EURORDIS and patient representatives involved in the ERNs (ePAG advocates) through a participatory and iterative process. The work was organised in three different phases: (1) clarify roles and identify common goals for ePAG advocates’ engagement in the ERNs; (2) define a set of measures; and (3) test the measures in three different ePAGs (European Patient Advocacy Groups). Results: The project allowed developing a common understanding among ePAG advocates of their role and goals in the ERNs and defining a patient-driven evaluation framework to assess their level of engagement in the ERNs’ activities and how effectively they were working to fulfil their role. Conclusion: Engaging with ERN clinicians to refine the framework would probably render it more relevant to the reality and priorities of the specific ERNs and more valuable as a tool to build a strong partnership culture. Such an evaluation framework could be integrated into the ERNs’ quality improvement system to ensure that the networks’ activities are driven by and remain responsive to patients’ needs.

Background The European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ERN ReCONNET) is a virtual Network that aims to improve and standardize the quality of care offered to rCTDs patients in Europe, empower patients, share knowledge and expertise, enhance research, support efficient use of resources. ERN ReCONNET covers 10 rCTDs: APS, UCTD, Idiopathic Inflammatory myopathies, IgG4, MCTD, Systemic sclerosis, Relapsing Polychondritis, SLE, Sjogren and EDS. Objectives Identification of unmet needs in diagnosis, monitoring and management of rCTDs after literature review of existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods After the review of existing CPGs, the most relevant unmet needs, both for clinicians and patients, were identified by discussion among the members of the network. Results A considerable number of unmet needs were identified. In particular, the lack of shared classification criteria, of evidence-based CPGs, validated tools for the assessment of treatment response and disease activity/damage are the major unmet needs especially for the rarest rCTDs. Transversal topics for all rCTDs that need to be addressed are the scarcity of EU/international randomised controlled trials, the identification of patient-reported outcomes and non-adherence to treatment, quality of life indicators, the need to develop composite disease activity scores for all rCTDs and specific (inter)national web-based registries. Patients highlighted the need of a more holistic approach to rCTDs, demanding more attention to pain, fatigue and psychological aspects related to the diseases and the promotion of an early diagnosis. Conclusion The identification of rCTDs unmet needs provided a very useful picture on future actions to be undertaken in order to provide a better care to patients. Many activities are ongoing towards these goals in ERN ReCONNET. These will be possible as a result of a EU collaboration among rCTDs stakeholders, the main added value of ERN ReCONNET. Acknowledgement Thanks to all ERN ReCONNET Steering Committe, Healthcare Providers, ePAGs and Team for huge support. Disclosure of Interests Diana Marinello: None declared, Simone Ticciati: None declared, Rosaria Talarico: None declared, Tobias Alexander: None declared, Laurent Arnaud Consultant for: Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, LFB, Lilly, Menarini France, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, and UCB., Paid instructor for: Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, LFB, Lilly, Menarini France, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, and UCB., Speakers bureau: Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, LFB, Lilly, Menarini France, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, and UCB., Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Lorenzo Beretta: None declared, Benjamin Chaigne: None declared, Alain Cornet Grant/research support from: No direct financial grants from Pharmaceutical companies, but some grants accrued LUPUS EUROPE does, in the form of Grants or payment for attending advisory boards or providing patient views, Speakers bureau: I have been involved in GSK panels to provide patient perspective. However, the minor service fee obtained accrued to LUPUS EUROPE ratyher than the company, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau: None declared, Rebecca Fischer-Betz Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline and UCB Pharma for performing the LuLa-study., Charissa Hermine Frank: None declared, Ilaria Galetti: None declared, Jurgen Grunert: None declared, vera guimaraes: None declared, Luca Iaccarino: None declared, Maarten Limper Consultant for: GSK, Roche and Thermofisher, Speakers bureau: GSK and Roche, Fransiska Malfait: None declared, Xavier Mariette Grant/research support from: Servier, Consultant for: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, lisa matthews: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Pfizer, BMS, Chemomab, Sanipedia, Speakers bureau: Actelion, BMS; MSD, Janssen, alain meyer: None declared, Simona Rednic: None declared, Vasco Romao: None declared, Carlo Alberto Scire: None declared, Vanessa Smith: None declared, Alberto Sulli: None declared, Farah Tamirou: None declared, Anna Viola Taulaigo: None declared, Angela Tincani Consultant for: UCB, Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, Sanofi, Roche, GSK, AlphaSigma, Lillly, Jannsen, Cellgene, Novartis, Ana Vieira: None declared, Maurizio Cutolo: None declared, Marta Mosca Paid instructor for: GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, UCB

The unexpected outbreak of the COVID-19 disease had significant and enormous repercussions on the healthcare systems, such as the need to reorganise healthcare organisations in order to concentrate resources needed to the care of COVID-19 patients and to respond in general to this health emergency. Due to these challenges, the care of several chronic conditions was in many cases discontinued and patients and healthcare professionals treating these conditions had to cope with this new scenario. This was the case of the world rare diseases (RDs) that had to face this global emergency despite the vulnerability of people with RDs and the well-known need for high expertise required to treat and manage them. The numerous lessons learned so far regarding health emergencies and RDs should represent the basis for the establishment of new healthcare policies and plans aimed at ensuring the preparedness of our health systems in providing appropriate care to people living with RDs in the case of eventual new emergencies. This paper aims at providing pragmatic considerations that might be useful in designing future actions to create or optimise existing organisational models for the care of RDs in case of future emergencies or any other situation that might threaten the provision of routine care. These policies and plans should benefit from the multi-stakeholder RDs networks (such as the European Reference Networks), that should join forces at European, national, and local levels to minimise the economic, organisational, and health-related impact and the negative effects of potential emergencies on the RDs community. In order to design and develop these policies and plans, a decalogue of points to consider were developed to ensure appropriate care for people living with RDs in the case of eventual future health emergencies.