Search

HER2-targeted therapies have substantially improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive breast and gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancers. Several other cancers exhibit HER2 expression or amplification, suggesting that HER2-targeted agents can have broader therapeutic impact. Zanidatamab is a humanised, bispecific monoclonal antibody directed against two non-overlapping domains of HER2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and anti-tumour activity of zanidatamab across a range of solid tumours with HER2 expression or amplification.This first-in-human, multicentre, phase 1, dose-escalation and expansion trial included patients aged 18 years and older, with a life expectancy of at least 3 months, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and locally advanced or metastatic, HER2-expressing or HER2-amplified solid tumours of any kind who had received all available approved therapies. The primary objectives of part 1 were to identify the maximum tolerated dose, optimal biological dose, or recommended dose of zanidatamab; all patients were included in the primary analyses. Part 1 followed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, including different intravenous doses (from 5 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg) and intervals (every 1, 2, or 3 weeks). The primary objective of part 2 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of zanidatamab monotherapy in solid tumours. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02892123), and parts 1 and 2 of the trial are complete. Part 3 of the study evaluates the use of zanidatamab in combination with chemotherapy and is ongoing.Recruitment took place between Sept 1, 2016, and March 13, 2021. In Part 1 (n=46), no dose-limiting toxicities were detected and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended dose for part 2 (n=22 for biliary tract cancer; n=28 for colorectal cancer; and n=36 for other HER2-expressing or HER2-amplified cancers excluding breast or gastro-oesophageal cancers; total n=86) was 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events in part 1 of the study were diarrhoea (24 [52%] of 46 patients; all grade 1-2) and infusion reactions (20 [43%] of 46 patients; all grade 1-2). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events in part 2 of the study were diarrhoea (37 [43%] of 86 patients; all grade 1-2 except for one patient) and infusion reactions (29 [34%] of 86 patients; all grade 1-2). A total of six grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in four (3%) of 132 patients. In part 2, 31 (37%; 95% CI 27·0-48·7) of 83 evaluable patients had a confirmed objective response. There were no treatment-related deaths.These results support that HER2 is an actionable target in various cancer histologies, including biliary tract cancer and colorectal cancer. Evaluation of zanidatamab continues in ongoing studies.Zymeworks.

PDF - 43KB, Plastin protein expression from plasma of stage II/III CRC patients. ELISA quantitated LCP1 and PLS3 protein level in USC cohort patients' serum. The significance in expression level was determined by the GraphPad Prism software. Data shown represent the mean ? standard deviation. P

PDF - 278KB, Time-to-tumor recurrence (TTR) by PLS3rs6643869 in female right sided CRC and female left sided CRC patients in USC cohort.

PDF - 85KB, Primer sequences and region of Plastin polymorphisms.

PDF - 91KB, Other PLS3 polymorphisms and outcome in patients with stage II or III colon cancer by sex (Training set).

ROC curve stratified by combination of CK20 and Survivin gene expression: An optimal cutoff value of either 0.16 for CK20 or 0.15 for Survivin yields a sensitivity of 79.6% and specificity of 85%.

PDF - 56KB, Time-to-tumor recurrence (TTR) by LCP111342 in USC cohort (Training set) stage II/III CRC male patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy.

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) express epithelial and stem cell–like genes, though current approved detection methods mainly use epithelial markers. We optimized a CTC isolation method that could capture their molecular heterogeneity and predict overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving various chemotherapy regimens. We combined immunomagnetic enrichment of CD45-negative, EpCAM-positive circulating cancer cells with qRT-PCR amplification of CK20 and survivin expression in 88 mCRC patients and 20 healthy controls. We then evaluated the prognostic value of baseline CTC CK20 and survivin expression in mCRC patients. The presence of elevated CTC CK20 or survivin expression distinguished mCRC patients from controls with sufficient sensitivity (79.6%) and specificity (85%). In univariate analysis, patients with high CTC-CK20 expression (9 vs. 33.2+ months, log-rank P < 0.001) or high CTC-survivin expression (10 vs. 33.2+ months, log-rank P = 0.032) had a significantly worse median OS than those with low expression of either marker. In multivariable analysis, the high CTC-CK20 group had significantly shortened OS (HR, 3.11; adjusted P = 0.01), and there was a trend toward inferior OS in the high CTC-survivin group (HR, 1.76; adjusted P = 0.099). Patients with either high CTC CK20 or survivin expression had inferior OS compared with those with low expression of both markers (HR, 4.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.56–12.35; adjusted P = 0.005). Colorectal cancer CTCs can be reliably isolated using epithelial and stem cell markers. CTC CK20 and survivin expression may effectively predict OS in mCRC patients receiving chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(10); 2401–8. ©2015 AACR.

PDF - 56KB, Time-to-tumor recurrence (TTR) by PLS3 rs6643869 in USC cohort (Training set) stage II/III CRC male patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy.

Supplementary Table 1. Summary of EMT-related SNPs Supplementary Table 2A. Association between baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in the bevacizumab cohort Supplementary Table 2B. Association between baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in the cetuximab cohort Supplementary Table 3. Association between TWIST1 rs2285682 and clinical outcomes in KRAS wild-type and mutant subgroups among the bevacizumab cohort Supplementary Table 4. Association between EMT-related SNPs and clinical outcomes stratified by gender in the bevacizumab cohort Supplementary Table 5. Association between TWIST1 rs2285682 and clinical outcomes in the cetuximab cohort

PDF - 86KB, LCP1 polymorphisms and outcome in patients with stage II or III colon cancer (USC cohort).

Purpose: The IL6/STAT3 axis promotes inflammation, angiogenesis, and cancer. The effect of genetic variants within this pathway on benefit from antiangiogenic cancer therapy is unknown. We tested whether SNPs in genes involved in IL6/STAT3 signaling can predict efficacy of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.Experimental Design: Associations between potentially functional IL6 (rs2069837 and rs1800795) and STAT3 (rs744166 and rs4796793) SNPs and clinical outcomes [progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and tumor response rate] were evaluated in mCRC patients receiving first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in two randomized phase III trials: TRIBE (n = 223, training cohort) and FIRE-3 (n = 288, validation cohort). Patients receiving FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in FIRE-3 (n = 264) served as a control cohort. The interaction between genotype and primary tumor location with clinical outcomes was examined. Genomic DNA isolated from whole blood or tumor tissue was analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing.Results: Patients with an IL6 rs2069837 G allele treated with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab had an inferior PFS than those with the A/A genotype in TRIBE [9.4 vs. 11.1 months; HR = 1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12–2.10; P = 0.004] and FIRE-3 (8.8 vs. 10.9 months; HR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.06–1.85; P = 0.015). These associations were confirmed in multivariable analyses and were not seen in the control cohort. In subgroup analysis, the effect of IL6 rs2069837 on PFS was present only in patients with left-sided cancers, but the test for interaction was not significant.Conclusions:IL6 rs2069837 genotype is a clinically relevant prognostic factor in mCRC patients treated with first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3218–26. ©2016 AACR.

Supplementary Table 1. Associations between baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in the training cohort (TRIBE) Supplementary Table 2. Associations between baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in the validation cohort (FIRE-3) Supplementary Table 3. Associations between baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in the control cohort (FIRE-3) Supplementary Table 4. Association between IL-6, STAT3 SNPs with clinical outcomes in the training cohort

Purpose: Vitamin D exerts its inhibitory influence on colon cancer growth by inhibiting Wnt signaling and angiogenesis. We hypothesized that SNPs in genes involved in vitamin D transport, metabolism, and signaling are associated with outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI and bevacizumab.Experimental Design: 522 mCRC patients enrolled in the FIRE-3 (discovery cohort) and TRIBE (validation set) trials treated with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab were included in this study. 278 patients receiving FOLFIRI and cetuximab (FIRE-3) served as a control cohort. Six SNPs in 6 genes (GC, CYP24A1, CYP27B1, VDR, DKK1, CST5) were analyzed.Results: In the discovery cohort, AA carriers of the GC rs4588 SNP encoding for the vitamin D–binding protein, and treated with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab had a shorter overall survival (OS) than those harboring any C allele (15.9 vs. 25.1 months) in both univariable (P = 0.001) and multivariable analyses (P = 0.047). This association was confirmed in the validation cohort in multivariable analysis (OS 18.1 vs. 26.2 months, HR, 1.83; P = 0.037). Interestingly, AA carriers in the control set exhibited a longer OS (48.0 vs. 25.2 months, HR, 0.50; P = 0.021). This association was further confirmed in a second validation cohort comprising refractory mCRC patients treated with cetuximab ± irinotecan (PFS 8.7 vs. 3.7 months) in univariable (P = 0.033) and multivariable analyses (P = 0.046).Conclusions: GC rs4588 SNP might serve as a predictive marker in mCRC patients treated with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab. Whereas AA carriers derive a survival benefit with FOLFIRI/cetuximab, treatment with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab is associated with a worse outcome. Clin Cancer Res; 24(4); 784–93. ©2017 AACR.

SNPs and clinical outcomes among patients with mCRC treated with first-line FOLFIRI/bevacizumab in FIRE-3 (discovery cohort)

Regorafenib has improved the survival of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), yet the mechanisms of inherited or acquired resistance are not well understood. A total of 50 patients with refractory mCRC were enrolled. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration was carried out at baseline, day 21 after initiation of regorafenib, and at the time of progression of disease (PD) using the CellSearch System (Veridex LLC, NJ, USA). Poly(A) mRNA was extracted from CTCs, and gene expression of epithelial and epithelial‐mesenchymal transition markers was analyzed by a multiplex‐PCR based DNA Chip. Patients with fewer than 3 CTCs at baseline and day 21 had a longer progression‐free survival than those with 3 or more CTCs (3.3 vs 2.0 months, P = .008 and 3.3 vs 2.0 months, P = .004, respectively). Patients with fewer than 3 CTCs at baseline and day 21 had a longer overall survival (OS) than those with 3 or more CTCs (10.0 vs 4.6 months, P, We identified circulating tumor cell count as a prognostic marker in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib. Circulating tumor cell EGFR expression was significantly increased with regorafenib at the time of disease progression, suggesting this to be a mode of resistance and lending further mechanistic evidence for the synergistic effects seen with regorafenib and anti‐EGFR mAbs.

361 Background: TRK-950 is a first-in-class humanized antibody raised against CAPRIN-1 which we have identified as a novel and universal target for cancer therapies. TRK-950 strongly and specifically binds to various cancer cells and shows anti-tumor effects via engagement of immune cells. A series of pre-clinical studies demonstrates its potency and safety. In the phase I study of TRK-950 monotherapy (NCT02990481), it appears safe and well tolerated. No DLT was observed and MTD was not reached at doses of 3-30mg/kg IV weekly. Here, we report on select cohort of the ongoing, multicenter phase Ib study of TRK-950 combined with standard of care (SOC) regimens in patients (pts) with gastric cancer including GEJ cancer (NCT03872947). Methods: Patients with gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer and measurable disease were enrolled in phase Ib study, and received paclitaxel on D1, 8, 15 and ramucirumab on D1, 15 of 28-day cycles. In addition TRK-950 was given 10 mg/kg IV weekly. DLT was evaluated during the first cycle. Response was assessed every 2 cycles up to Cycle 6 and every 3 cycles thereafter. Primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) per REClST v1.1. Tumor CAPRIN-1 expression was retrospectively assessed by IHC. Results: Nine patients were enrolled, median age 58 yrs; Karnofsky performance status 80 (11%), 90 (67%), 100 (22%); 89% male, 11% female; median number of prior treatments 2 [1, 4]. TRK-950 in combination with ramucirumab and paclitaxel was well tolerated with no DLTs. Most common all-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were fatigue (67%), vomiting (33%), anemia (22%), nausea (22%), diarrhea (22%), neutrophil count decreased (22%) and decreased appetite (22%). Most common grade ≥ 3 TRAE in ≥ 20% of pts were anemia (22%) and neutrophil count decreased (22%). In 9 response-evaluable pts, ORR was 55.6% and DCR was 100%. Four patients had a screening CAPRIN-1 score of 3+, and all achieved partial response. Conclusions: TRK-950 binds to a newly described target, CAPRIN-1, and has an acceptable safety and tolerability profile when combined with ramucirumab and paclitaxel in gastric cancer including GEJ cancer. Preliminary clinical activity is demonstrated in pre-treated patients with encouraging response rates, particularly enriched by the expression of CAPRIN-1. Further antitumor activity is being confirmed by limiting patients to only 1 prior treatment regimen with an eye towards a randomized trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03872947 .

5 Background: A growing body of evidence supports the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a useful biomarker for detecting molecular residual disease (MRD) in colorectal cancer (CRC). Immediately after surgery or during adjuvant therapy, high levels of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from normal tissue may limit the detection of tumor-derived ctDNA. The optimal timing of blood collection for reliable MRD detection after surgery or adjuvant therapy remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective, U.S.-based, multi-institutional study, data from commercial ctDNA testing in 16,347 patients with stage I-III CRC were analyzed. Complete clinical data were available for 417 patients with 2,538 plasma samples collected between 6/2019 and 4/2022. The median follow-up for relapsed and non-relapsed patients was 730 and 615 days, respectively. A personalized, tumor-informed multiplex PCR-based next-generation sequencing assay (Signatera) was used to quantify ctDNA prior to surgery and postoperatively in a longitudinal manner. We analyzed the kinetics of total cfDNA and compared it with the ctDNA MRD positivity rates at various time points after surgery. Results: Among all patients, cfDNA levels were higher immediately after surgery (0-2 weeks) and gradually declined during the subsequent 2-8 weeks (p6 months post-operatively and subsequent to any adjuvant therapy) was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival as compared to ctDNA negative patients (MRD: HR 14.1, 95% CI: 5.8-34; p

As cancer care is transitioning to personalized therapies with necessary complementary or companion biomarkers there is significant interest in determining to what extent non-invasive liquid biopsies reflect the gold standard solid biopsy. We have established an approach for measuring patient-specific circulating and solid cell concordance by introducing tumor touch preparations to the High-Definition Single Cell Analysis workflow for high-resolution cytomorphometric characterization of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Subgroups of cells based on size, shape and protein expression were identified in both liquid and solid biopsies, which overall displayed high inter- and intra- patient pleomorphism at the single-cell level of analysis. Concordance of liquid and solid biopsies was patient-dependent and between 0.1-0.9. Morphometric variables displayed particularly high correlation, suggesting that circulating cells do not represent distinct subpopulations from the solid tumor. This was further substantiated by significant decrease in concentration of circulating cells after mCRC resection. Combined with the association of circulating cells with tumor burden and necrosis of hepatic lesions, our overall findings demonstrate that liquid biopsy cells can be informative biomarkers in the mCRC setting. Patient-specific level of concordance can readily be measured to establish the utility of circulating cells as biomarkers and define biosignatures for liquid biopsy assays.

11515 Background: INT230-6 is a novel intratumoral (IT) agent with a dual anti-cancer mechanism (tumor cytoreduction while stimulating antigen presentation and recruitment of T-cells). The drug is comprised of cisplatin (CIS) and vinblastine (VIN) co-formulated with an amphiphilic molecule that enables drug dispersion throughout tumors and passive diffusion into cancer cells following IT delivery. In the neoadjuvant setting, a single injection can cause necrosis in > 95% of the tumor and recruit TILs. Combining with anti-CTLA-4 improved responses in preclinical models. Methods: INT230-6 dose is set by the tumor’s longest diameter and is proportional to the injected disease volume. INT230-6 is administered IT Q2W for 5 treatment sessions followed by maintenance every 9 weeks as monotherapy or with IPI 3mg/kg IV Q3W for 4 doses. Biopsies from injected tumors are obtained pretreatment and Day 28 for immunoprofiling. Results: 22 subjects with various advanced STS histologies with a median age of 64 and a median of 3 prior systemic therapies were enrolled (11 INT230-6 alone, 11 IPI combination). There were 178 image-guided IT INT230-6 injections (107 to deep tumors) at INT230-6 doses ranging from 5 to 242 mL (121mg CIS, 24.2mg VIN, doses which vastly exceed the usual IV doses of these drugs). PK analysis showed that > 95% of drug agents remain in the tumor. The most common (> 25%) all-grade related adverse events (AEs) in evaluable monotherapy subjects (n = 10) were pain (80%), decreased appetite (40%), nausea (40%), anemia (30%), fatigue (30%) and vomiting (30%). Tolerability was similar for the combination with IPI. Most events were low grade. The incidence of grade 3 AEs for the INT230-6 arm was 30% and for the IPI combination was 10%. There were no related grade 4 or 5 AEs in either cohort. RECIST metrics may not accurately reflect clinical benefit with this treatment given large volumes of INT230-6 is repeatedly injected into a tumor and local inflammation may occur. Paired biopsies showed reduction in proliferating tumor cells and an increase in T-cell infiltrates. The disease control rate at the first imaging timepoint for evaluable INT230-6 subjects (n = 9) was 56% and for evaluable IPI combination (n = 5) was 80%. Abscopal effects were seen in 2 monotherapy subjects, though most uninjected tumors were not tracked. The estimated 1-year overall survival was 88% for the IPI combo and 60% for the monotherapy cohort. Conclusions: IT INT230-6 is well tolerated as monotherapy and combined with IPI. STS, which is typically not sensitive to immunotherapy, may be amenable to INT230-6 or IPI combo to create antigens and promote a systemic immune response. Preliminary efficacy using INT230-6 alone is encouraging and will be evaluated in a global phase 3 trial. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether the addition of IPI may improve patient outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT03058289.

2520 Background: INT230-6 is a new product with a unique dual anti-cancer mechanism. The drug is comprised of cisplatin (CIS) and vinblastine (VIN) co-formulated with an amphiphilic molecule that enables drug dispersion throughout a tumor and passive diffusion into cancer cells following intratumoral (IT) delivery. A neoadjuvant study in breast cancer confirms that a single injection can kill 95% of an injected tumor and recruit TILs. Methods: INT230-6 treatments are Q2W for up to 5 treatments followed by maintenance dosing every 9 weeks. Dose is set by the tumor’s longest diameter or volume. One arm received INT230-6 plus PEM 200mg IV Q3W. Biopsies from injected tumor are taken pretreatment and Day 28 for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. Results: Sixty-two subjects received INT230-6 alone (median age 61, with 4 prior treatments), and 21 INT230-6 + PEM (median age 70, with 3 prior treatments). To these subjects over 575 image guided INT230-6 IT injections were given (320 to visceral tumors such as lung, liver, pancreas). Doses ranged from 0.14 to 175mL (87.5 mg of CIS, 17.5 mg VIN - higher than typical IV doses). Pharmacokinetic data shows > 95% of the INT230-6 active agents remain in the tumor. The most common ( > 25%) adverse events (AEs) related to INT230-6 were localized pain (58%), nausea (40%), and fatigue (29%). The most common AEs attributed to the PEM combination were nausea (62%), localized pain (57%), vomiting (57%), decreased appetite (43%), fatigue (43%) and constipation (29%). The incidence of grade 3 AEs for the INT230-6 arm was 11% and for the PEM combination was 14%. There were no related grade 4 or 5 AEs in the INT230-6 arm; and one grade 4 neutrophil count decrease was seen on the PEM combination. There were no dose limiting adverse events. No patient discontinued therapy due to toxicities related to either drug or injection procedure. The monotherapy arm enrolled patients from 17 tumor types; while the PEM combo recruited primarily pancreatic, CRC, triple negative breast, or bile duct cancer. IHC results confirm a marked reduction in proliferating tumor cells with influx of CD4 and CD8 T-cells. Seven of the INT230-6 monotherapy patients had non injected tumor shrinkage in 9 visceral/deep lesions. Estimated median overall survival (mOS) was over 1 year for both arms. Conclusions: In this clinical trial, deep and superficial tumor injections into patients with widely metastatic disease was feasible and well tolerated. Biopsies confirm the dual anti-cancer mechanism, and study patients live longer than would be expected for these refractory populations. INT230-6’s rapid tumor killing and immune activation properties may offer an alternative to control refractory patients (even those that are chemotherapy refractory) and the product is moving into randomized controlled registration trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03058289.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rising in incidence and remains a leading cause of cancer-related death. After a decade of disappointing trials following the approval of sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC, a number of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and monoclonal antibodies targeting angiogenesis and immune checkpoints have recently been approved. The phase 3 CELESTIAL trial demonstrated improved progression-free and overall survival with the TKI cabozantinib compared to placebo, supporting it as a treatment option for patients with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. Cabozantinib blocks multiple key pathways of HCC pathogenesis, including VEGFR, MET, and the TAM (TYRO3, AXL, MER) family of receptor kinases, and promotes an immune-permissive tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the mechanisms of action of cabozantinib, including effects on tumor growth and its immunomodulatory properties, providing pre-clinical rationale for combination strategies with checkpoint inhibitors. We discuss the design and outcomes of CELESTIAL including improved survival across subgroups defined by age, disease etiology, baseline AFP level, prior therapies (including duration of prior sorafenib), and tumor burden. Cabozantinib had a manageable safety profile with dose modification. Studies combining cabozantinib with atezolizumab (COSMIC-312) and durvalumab (CAMILLA) in the first and second-line settings are ongoing, as well as a neoadjuvant study of cabozantinib with nivolumab. Future investigations are warranted to define the use of cabozantinib in patients with Child-Pugh B liver function and identify markers predictive of clinical benefit. The role of cabozantinib in HCC continues to evolve with an anticipated role in immunotherapy combinations.

Introduction: COVID-19 has several overlapping phases. Treatment has focused on the late stage of the disease in hospital. Yet, the continuation of the pandemic is by propagation of the disease in outpatients. The current public health strategy relies solely on vaccines to prevent disease. Areas Covered: We searched the major national registries, pubmed.org, and the preprint servers for all ongoing, completed and published trial results with subject numbers of 100 or more on, and used a targeted search to find announcements of unpublished trial results. As of 2/15/2021, we found 111 publications reporting findings in human studies on 14 classes of agents, and on 9 vaccines. There were 62 randomized controlled studies, the rest retrospective observational analyses. Only 21 publications dealt with outpatient care, the rest all in hospitalized patients. Remdesivir and convalescent plasma have emergency use authorization for hospitalized patients in the U.S.A. There is also support for glucocorticoid treatment of the COVID-19 respiratory distress syndrome. Monoclonal antibodies are authorized for outpatients, but the supply is inadequate to treat all at time of diagnosis. Favipiravir, ivermectin, and interferons are approved in certain countries Expert Opinion: Worldwide vaccination is now underway. Vaccines and antibodies are highly antigen specific and new variants are appearing. There is a need for treatment of outpatients who contract the disease, in addition to mass immunization. We call on public health authorities to authorize treatments with known low risk and potential benefit for use in parallel with mass immunization.

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, continues to be a major health problem since its first description in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Multiple drugs have been tried to date in the treatment of COVID-19. Critical to treatment of COVID-19 and advancing therapeutics is an appreciation of the multiple stages of this disease and the importance of timing for investigation and use of various agents. We considered articles related to COVID-19 indexed on PubMed published January 1, 2020-November 15, 2020, and considered papers on the medRxiv preprint server. We identified relevant stages of COVID-19 including three periods: pre-exposure, incubation, and detectable viral replication; and five phases: the viral symptom phase, the early inflammatory phase, the secondary infection phase, the multisystem inflammatory phase, and the tail phase. This common terminology should serve as a framework to guide when COVID-19 therapeutics being studied or currently in use is likely to provide benefit rather than harm. (AIDS Rev. 2021;22:40-47)

Background INT230-6 is a novel formulation of cisplatin and vinblastine with an amphiphilic cell penetration enhancer that has been shown to enhance dispersion of the drug throughout tumors and allow diffusion into cells when given intratumorally. In preclinical models, INT230-6 has resulted in cell death, dendritic cell influx, antigen presentation and T-cell engagement with strong synergy when combined with checkpoint inhibitors Methods This phase 1/2 study evaluated Q2week injections of INT230-6 x 5 dosed by tumor volume alone or with 200 mg pembrolizumab IV Q3 weeks. Eligble patients had any advanced malignancy refractory to standard therapy with an injectable tumor. Results Sixty subjects (median 3 prior therapies (range 0–10)) were enrolled (53 monotherapy, 7 combo). Median age was 60 (42–85). 19 different cancer types were accrued with breast cancer and sarcoma being the most frequent. Over 200 deep tumor injections were administered at doses of up to 172 ml of INT230-6 (86 mg of CIS, 17 mg of Vin). PK analysis revealed Conclusions INT230-6 is well tolerated when administered intratumorally alone or in combination with pembrolizumab. Pharmacodynamic assessments provides proof of concept that this drug can reduce viable cancer cells and increases CD4/CD8 T-cell infiltrates leading to durable clinical benefit off treatment. Trial Registration NCT 03058289 Ethics Approval The study was approved by USC, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Fox Chase, UMass, Columbia, and Johns Hopkins Institution’s Ethics Board Consent Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal

Cetuximab, an IgG1 EGFR-directed antibody, promotes antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. We hypothesized that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in immune regulatory pathways may predict outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab-based regimens. A total of 924 patients were included: 105 received cetuximab in IMCL-0144 and cetuximab/irinotecan in GONO-ASL608LIOM01 (training cohort), 225 FOLFIRI/cetuximab in FIRE-3 (validation cohort 1), 74 oxaliplatin/cetuximab regimens in JACCRO CC-05/06 (validation cohort 2), and 520 FOLFIRI/bevacizumab in FIRE-3 and TRIBE (control cohorts). Twelve SNPs in five genes (IDO1, PD-L1, PD-1, CTLA-4, CD24) were evaluated by PCR-based direct sequencing. We analyzed associations between genotype and clinical outcomes. In the training cohort, patients with the CD24 rs52812045 A/A genotype had a significantly shorter median PFS and OS than those with the G/G genotype (PFS 1.3 vs. 3.6 months, OS 2.3 vs. 7.8 months) in univariate (PFS HR 3.62, p = 0.001, OS HR 3.27, p = 0.0004) and multivariate (PFS HR 3.18, p = 0.009, OS HR 4.93, p = 0.001) analyses. Similarly, any A allele carriers in the JACCRO validation cohort had a significantly shorter PFS than G/G carriers (9.2 vs. 11.8 months, univariate HR 1.90, p = 0.011, multivariate HR 2.12, p = 0.018). These associations were not demonstrated in the control cohorts. CD24 genetic variants may help select patients with metastatic colorectal cancer most likely to benefit from cetuximab-based therapy.

BACKGROUNDThe spread of COVID-19 from Wuhan China, has been alarmingly rapid. Epidemiologic techniques succeeded in containing the disease in China, but efforts have not been as successful in the rest of the World, with a total of 29,155,581 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 926,544 deaths worldwide as of September 15, 2020. Projections are for continued new infections and deaths if no effective therapeutic interventions can be initiated over the next several months. We performed a systematic review to determine the potential time course for development of treatments and vaccines, focusing on availability now and continuing in the last half of 2020.METHODSClinical TrialsWe reviewed up-to-date information from several sources to identify potential treatments for COVID-19: The Reagan-Udall Expanded Access Navigator COVID-19 Treatment Hub was used to track the efforts of companies to develop agents. We focused on trials completed as of September 1, 2020 on identified agents We used several different sources: (A) covid-trials.org, then validated results on (B) clinicaltrials.gov and the (C) World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). We excluded studies which were clearly observational, with no randomization, control, or comparison group. We further set a cutoff of 100 for numbers of subjects, since smaller trial size could lack statistical power to establish superiority of the intervention over the control.PublicationsWe searched for published trial results on pubmed.gov and on medRxiv, the preprint server, and used a targeted Google™ search to find announcements of unpublished trial resultsRESULTSClinical Trials in RecruitmentAs of our cutoff date of April 1, 2020, we found 409 trials meeting our minimum requirement of 100 subjects. The WHO Solidarity megatrial for hospitalized patients was launched in over 100 countries, actively comparing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), lopanovir/ritonavir (LPV/r) alone and in combination with interferon beta-1, and remdesivir. The LPV/r alone and HCQ arms have already been discontinued. Of these, only 9 were conducted on outpatients. A few vaccine trials are hoping to complete Phase 3 enrollment by the end of the third quarter 2020, but a prolonged follow-up of patients will likely be required.Clinical trials CompletedAs of September 1, 2020, there were 231 trials reporting completion, Of these, only 59 studies enrolled 100 or more subjects. There were 34 trials in hospitalized patients, 9 directed at outpatients, and 8 prevention studies,Published DataAs of September 1, 2020 we found 70 publications reporting findings in human studies on 13 classes of drugs and on 6 vaccines. There were 33 randomized placebo or active control studies; the rest were retrospective observational. Only seven publications dealt with outpatient care, the rest all in hospitalized patients.Available TreatmentsAt this time, remdesivir and convalescent plasma have been granted emergency use authorization in the U.S.A., solely for hospitalized patients. There is also support for glucocorticoid treatment of the COVID-19 respiratory distress syndrome. No treatments or prophylaxis are offered for outpatients.CONCLUSIONCOVID-19 is propagated primarily by infected ambulatory individuals. There have been no options brought forward for prevention and non-hospital treatment with only a few randomized, controlled outpatient studies expected to yield results in time to impact on the continuing pandemic by the end of 2020. It will be necessary for public health authorities to make hard decisions, with limited data, to prevent the continued spread of the disease. The choices will be hardest when dealing with possible early release of safe and effective vaccines which would, of course, be of greatest benefit to the World’s population.

Background Through enhancement of the Wnt signalling pathway, R-spondins are oncogenic drivers in colorectal cancer. Experimental data suggest that the R-spondin/Wnt axis stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-dependent angiogenesis. We therefore hypothesise that variations within R-spondin genes predict outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with upfront FOLFIRI and bevacizumab. Patients and methods 773 patients with mCRC enrolled in the randomised phase III FIRE-3 and TRIBE trials and receiving either FOLFIRI/bevacizumab (training and validation cohorts) or FOLFIRI/cetuximab (control group) were involved in this study. The impact of six functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the R-spondin 1-3 genes on outcome was evaluated. Results RAS and KRAS wild-type patients harbouring any G allele of the RSPO2 rs555008 SNP had a longer overall survival compared with those having a TT genotype in both the training (FIRE-3) and validation (TRIBE) cohorts (29.0 vs 23.6 months, P = 0.009 and 37.8 vs 19.4 months, P = 0.021 for RAS wild-type patients and 28.4 vs 22.3 months, P = 0.011 and 36.0 vs 23.3 months, P = 0.046 for KRAS wild-type patients). Conversely, any G allele carriers with KRAS and RAS mutant tumours exhibited a shorter progression-free survival compared with TT genotype carriers, whereas the results were clinically more evident for KRAS mutant patients in both the training and validation cohorts (8.1 vs 11.2 months, P = 0.023 and 8.7 vs 10.3 months, P = 0.009). Conclusion Genotyping of the RSPO2 rs555008 polymorphism may help to select patients who will derive the most benefit from FOLFIRI/bevacizumab dependent on (K)RAS mutational status.

574 Background: Pancreatic (PC) and biliary cancers (BC) are cold tumors with limited activity of single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) have immunomodulatory effects manifested by upregulation of interferon pathways and expression of endogenous retroviral signatures. We performed a phase Ib study of the DNMTi guadecitabine (G) and durvalumab (D) in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma, PC and BC. We report initial results from the PC and BC cohorts. Methods: This is a phase Ib study to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination (dose escalation; 3+3 design) and evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) in expansion cohorts of PC and BC. G was given at escalating doses of 30 mg/m2 and 45 mg/m2 subQ for 5 days q 28 days. D was given at 1500 mg IV on day 8 of each cycle. Expansion was started at the MTD. Eligibility criteria included ECOG 0-1, ANC ≥ 1,500, platelets > 100,000, albumin ≥ 2.5 g/dL, total bilirubin ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal, failure of ≥ 1 prior line of therapy for advanced disease. Prior anti PD-1/PDL-1 was not allowed. Tumor biopsies were performed during screening and on cycle 3 day 1. Results: A total of 11 pts were treated in dose escalation; 3 at dose level 1, and 8 (6 evaluable for DLT) at dose level 2. Given lack of dose-limiting toxicities, MTD was the highest planned dose of G at 45 mg/m2. 24 pts with PC and 23 pts with BC were treated in dose escalation and expansion. For the PC cohort: median age was 66 (43, 93), 29% female, 67% ECOG 1, and median number of prior therapies 2 (1,3). For the BC cohort: median age was 61 (41, 85), 52% female, 78% ECOG 1, and median number of prior therapies 1 (1,3). All grade treatment related AEs in ≥10% of pts were neutropenia (55%), leukopenia (50%), anemia (33%), fatigue (33%), thrombocytopenia (17%), nausea (15%), and anorexia (10%). Grade 3/4 AEs in ≥10% of pts were neutropenia (40%), leukopenia (35%), and anemia (13%). There was 1(5%) PR in PC cohort lasting > 24 mo and ongoing and 1(5%) in BC cohort lasting 12 mo; both were in MSS pts. SD was noted in 7/24 (29%) PC and 5/23 (22%) BC pts, 8 of which lasted ≥4 mo. Median PFS for PC and BC was 2.1 mo [1.9, 3.8] and 1.9 mo [1.4, 2] respectively. Median OS for PC and BC was 4.4 mo [3.4, NR] and 8.6 mo [6.4, NR]. Six and 12 mo OS rates are 38% [21, 66] and 27% [13, 56] for PC; 69% [52, 91] and 35% [19, 63] for BC. 4% of PC pts and 42% of BC pts received another therapy after progression. Conclusions: The combination of G and D has a manageable safety profile in pts with advanced PC and BC; grade 3/4 AEs were limited to myelosuppression. The combination had limited clinical activity based on ORR and PFS in this unselected, pretreated population; however, a subset of pts appeared to derive prolonged clinical benefit, and OS rates were comparable to standard second line chemotherapy, despite a minority of pts receiving subsequent treatment. Biomarker analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03257761.

517 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death, with a recurrence rate of 85% after curative surgery and a 5-year survival rate of 10%. Serum biomarkers like CA 19-9 lack sensitivity and specificity (10% of patients fail to produce CA 19-9), and are poor indicators of molecular residual disease (MRD). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection allows for MRD identification months ahead of radiological findings, and may assess molecular response and patient outcomes. Methods: A personalized and tumor-informed multiplex PCR assay (Signatera™ bespoke mPCR NGS assay) was used for the detection and quantification of ctDNA in a prospective clinical cohort of patients. Serial time points were collected for unresectable, borderline resectable, and resectable subsets of patients to monitor ctDNA levels in response to treatment (see Table). Results: 93 patients were included, with a median age of 67.3 yrs and 45% female. 285 timepoints were analyzed for ctDNA presence, with each patient having between 1 and 7 timepoints (median 3 timepoints per patient). 46 patients had one or more samples positive for ctDNA, resulting in an anytime ctDNA positivity rate of 49.5%. Anytime positivity correlated with the stage of disease (p

6 Background: For patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), the current standard of care involves curative-intent definitive chemoradiation. For those that recur locally, salvage surgery maybe a consideration. ASCC, however, still lacks a non-invasive blood-based biomarker, which can be of value in this patient population for monitoring recurrence and/or response to immunotherapy later. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising non-invasive tool to assess molecular residual disease (MRD) and recurrence in ASCC. Here, we evaluated real-world utility of ctDNA status to identify MRD and recurrence in ASCC patients across all stages. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with any stage ASCC receiving SOC or/and immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. A personalized tumor-informed PCR/NGS-based assay (Signatera) was used for ctDNA detection, in the pre/on/post-treatment and surveillance setting. Results: In this study, plasma samples (n=105) were collected from 25 ASCC patients (13 females, 12 males; median age 66 years) at various timepoints for a median follow-up of 315 days (range: 59-1717), post-diagnosis; 12 patients were HPV-positive, 1 patient was HPV-negative, and 12 had unknown HPV status; 88% (22/25) of the patients had serial timepoints (≥2) available. ctDNA-positivity rates, test results, and ctDNA quantification by stage are summarized in Table. The quantitated ctDNA values (mean tumor molecules (MTM)/mL) increased in concordance with the stage of the disease, with values trending higher in stage III and IV. In addition, complete clinical outcome information was available for 22/25 patients at the time of releasing this data. Of the 96 plasma samples drawn from these patients, 68 (70%) were in the surveillance setting (post-definitive therapy). No recurrences were observed among 15 patients who cleared ctDNA on treatment and/or tested negative post-treatment, whereas, 6/7 ctDNA-positive patients were confirmed to have disease recurrence and 1 was pending confirmatory imaging. This often predated recurrence on scans. Conclusions: Measuring and monitoring MRD in patients with ASCC is feasible and has the potential to impact clinical decision making. Our study is the first to set the benchmark for the feasibility of using a tumor-informed assay in ASCC. Larger prospective studies are needed to explore the clinical utility of ctDNA status to guide disease surveillance and management of ASCC.[Table: see text]

TPS637 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by stromal fibrosis, hypoxia, and nutritional deprivation. PDAC tumors grow aggressively, diagnosis is typically made after metastasis and the disease remains associated with poor outcomes. The triplet chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel with cisplatin was associated with a median overall survival of 16.4 months in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in the first-line setting (Jameson et al., 2020). Nutritional, metabolic interventions offer an opportunity to fundamentally change the tumor microenvironment and improve outcomes for patients. A ketogenic diet defined as lower carbohydrate, lower protein, and higher fat can significantly reduce glucose and insulin and increase metabolically active ketone bodies and has been evaluated in patients with a variety of solid tumors (Weber et al, 2020). Recently, a ketogenic diet combined with triplet chemotherapy was shown to inhibit murine pancreatic KPC tumor growth and significantly prolong animal survival over chemotherapy alone. Tumor growth inhibition was associated with glucose depletion, altered TCA substrate usage, and NADH elevation. Methods: In this Phase II randomized clinical trial (NCT04631445), we are evaluating a medically supervised ketogenic diet (MSKD) versus a standard diet when combined with the triplet therapy in patients with treatment-naive advanced pancreatic cancer. The primary endpoint is progression free survival for triplet therapy while on MSKD or non-MSKD. Secondary endpoints include disease control rate (PR+ CR+ SD for at least 9 weeks), change in CA 19-9 (or CA125, or CEA if not expressers of CA 19-9), average insulin levels, HbA1c, body weight, a comparison of gut microbial diversity, changes in serum metabolites and quality of life via the EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. Unlike prior ketogenic intervention studies, the MSKD is being supported by a continuous care nutrition intervention through Virta Health Corp, that offers tracking of daily ketone and glucose levels, a web-based software application, education, and communication with a remote care team to ensure sustained nutritional ketosis. A total of 40 patients with untreated metastatic PDAC are planned for enrollment, 20 randomized to each arm. The trial opened for accrual November 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04631445.

BackgroundBackground: Study IT-01 (KEYNOTE-A10) evaluates INT230-6, a novel formulation of cisplatin (CIS) and vinblastine (VIN) with an amphiphilic cell penetration enhancer designed for intratumoral (IT) administration, as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab (PEM). In preclinical studies, INT230-6 increases drug dispersion throughout the tumor, allows drug diffusion into cancer cells and recruits dendritic, CD4 and CD8 T cells. The addition of PEM improves these responses in mouse models.MethodsIT-01 is an open-label phase 1/2 study, currently enrolling adult subjects with solid tumors in phase 2. The study assesses the safety and efficacy of INT230-6 IT Q2W up to 5 doses as monotherapy or with PEM 200mg Q3W. Biopsies from injected tumor are taken pretreatment and Day 28 for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis.ResultsFifty-seven INT230-6, two INT230-6 then PEM combination, and thirteen INT230-6 + PEM combination subjects were enrolled having a median of 4 prior therapies (0, 10). Median age was 62. 20+ cancer types were accrued; breast cancer and sarcoma were the most frequent. Over 500 image guided INT230-6 IT injections were given (253 to deep tumors) at doses of 0.3 to 172mL (86 mg CIS, 17.2 mg VIN) in a single session (contains higher amounts than typical IV chemo doses). PK shows that 95% of INT230-6 active agents remain in the tumor.1 The most common (>25%) related adverse events (AEs) for INT230-6 alone were localized pain (59%), nausea (37%), and fatigue (29%). Safety profile of the PEM combination was similar. There were no related grade 4 or 5 AEs in either arm. The median overall survival (mOS) estimated with removal of 700cm3 tumor burdens was 433 days for monotherapy (n=51) and 513 days for PEM combination (n=12), which compares favorably to results seen in basket studies of patients having similar prognostic factors (ECOG, LDH, # of metastatic sites).2 IHC results indicate influx of CD4 and CD8 T-cells in injected lesions. No meaningful changes were observed in circulating inflammatory cytokines. Abscopal effects in the monotherapy arm were observed in 15 visceral/deep lesions in 11 patients, primarily who received an INT230-6 dose >50% of their total tumor burden (TTB).ConclusionsINT230-6 is well tolerated when administered IT as monotherapy and combined with PEM. Data suggests that INT230-6 prolongs survival compared to published basket studies in patients with similar prognostic factors. IHC and abscopal results indicate dosing INT230-6 may also activate a T-cell mediated immune response.AcknowledgementsN/ATrial RegistrationNCT# 03058289ReferencesOwelien. Historical PK data from IV administration. J Cancer Res 1977; 8.Abstract. Wagner M, et al. Validation of the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score in 100 patients with advanced sarcoma enrolled in early phase clinical trials at a major cancer center. JCO 2015. https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.10558Ethics ApprovalThe protocol was approved by an institutional review board, independent ethics committee, or research ethics board at each institution. All subjects or their legally acceptable representative provided written informed consent before screening. The study was designed, undertaken, and reported in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and is registered with clinicaltrial.gov with registration no NCT03058289.

BackgroundStudy IT-01 evaluates INT230-6, a novel formulation of cisplatin (CIS) and vinblastine (VIN) with an amphiphilic cell penetration enhancer designed for intratumoral (IT) administration, as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab (IPI). In preclinical studies, INT230-6 increases drug dispersion throughout the tumor, allows drug diffusion into cancer cells and recruits dendritic, CD4 and CD8 T-cells. Further, the addition of IPI has shown to improve INT230-6 responses in preclinical models.1MethodsIT-01 is an open-label phase 1/2 study, currently enrolling adult subjects with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors, including soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The study assesses the safety and efficacy of INT230-6 administered IT Q2W up to 5 treatment sessions as monotherapy or with IPI 3mg/kg IV Q3W for 4 doses. Biopsies from injected tumor are taken pretreatment and Day 28 for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis.Results22 subjects with STS (14 INT230-6 monotherapy, 8 IPI combination) have been enrolled with a median age was 65, having a median of 4 (2,10) prior therapies. INT230-6 doses of up to 175 mL (87.5 mg of CIS, 17.5 mg VIN) were injected in one or more tumors at a single dosing session, which contains doses exceeding the typical IV doses of the cytotoxic drugs.2 PK analysis estimates that 95% of INT230-6 active agents remain in the tumor. The most common (>25%) related adverse events (AEs) in evaluable monotherapy subjects (n=13) were localized pain (77%), fatigue (39%), decreased appetite (31%), and nausea (31%). The most common (>25%) related AEs in evaluable IPI subjects (n=4) were anemia (50%), fatigue (50%), pruritus (50%), and rash maculo-papular (50%). There were no related grade 4 or 5 AEs in either cohort.The median overall survival (OS) estimate for the monotherapy population (n=14) has not been reached with a median follow-up of 425 days, which compares favorably to results seen in basket studies of patients with similar prognostic factors (ECOG, LDH, # of metastatic sites).3 4 IHC results indicate influx of CD4 and CD8 T-cells without meaningful changes in circulating inflammatory cytokines. Abscopal effects in the monotherapy arm were observed in multiple lesions in 4 subjects. OS data for the 8 IPI combination subjects is immature.ConclusionsIT INT230-6 is well tolerated when administered as monotherapy and combined with IPI in STS subjects. INT230-6 monotherapy survival compares favorably to published basket studies in STS with similar prognostic factors. IHC and abscopal effects indicate dosing may activate a T-cell mediated immune response.Trial RegistrationNCT # 03058289ReferencesBloom AC, et al. Intratumorally delivered formulation, INT230-6, containingpotent anticancer agents induces protective T cell immunity and memory. OncoImmunology 2019.Owelien. Historical PK data from IV administration. J Cancer Res 1977; 8.Livingston J, et al. Validation of prognostic scoring and assessment of clinical benefit for patients with bone sarcomas enrolled in phase I clinical trials. Oncotarget 2016;7: 64421–64430. https://www.oncotarget.com/article/10910/Abstract M, et al. Validation of the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score in 100 patients with advanced sarcoma enrolled in early phase clinical trials at a major cancer center. JCO 2015. https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.10558WagnerEthics ApprovalThe protocol was approved by an institutional review board, independent ethics committee, or research ethics board at each institution. All subjects or their legally acceptable representative provided written informed consent before screening. The study was designed, undertaken, and reported in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and is registered with clinicaltrial.gov with registration no NCT03058289.

BACKGROUND The landscape of hereditary syndromes and clinicopathologic characteristics among US Latino/Hispanic individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains poorly understood. METHODS A total of 265 patients with CRC who were enrolled in the Hispanic Colorectal Cancer Study were included in the current study. Information regarding CRC risk factors was elicited through interviews, and treatment and survival data were abstracted from clinical charts. Tumor studies and germline genetic testing results were collected from medical records or performed using standard molecular methods. RESULTS The mean age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 53.7 years (standard deviation, 10.3 years), and 48.3% were female. Overall, 21.2% of patients reported a first-degree or second-degree relative with CRC; 3.4% met Amsterdam I/II criteria. With respect to Bethesda guidelines, 38.5% of patients met at least 1 criterion. Of the 161 individuals who had immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability testing performed, 21 (13.0%) had mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient (dMMR) tumors. dMMR tumors were associated with female sex (61.9%), earlier age at the time of diagnosis (50.4 ± 12.4 years), proximal location (61.9%), and first-degree (23.8%) or second-degree (9.5%) family history of CRC. Among individuals with dMMR tumors, 13 (61.9%) had a germline MMR mutation (MutL homolog 1 [MLH1] in 6 patients; MutS homolog 2 [MSH2] in 4 patients; MutS homolog 6 [MHS6] in 2 patients; and PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component [PMS2] in 1 patient). The authors identified 2 additional MLH1 mutation carriers by genetic testing who had not received immunohistochemistry/microsatellite instability testing. In total, 5.7% of the entire cohort were confirmed to have Lynch syndrome. In addition, 6 individuals (2.3%) had a polyposis phenotype. CONCLUSIONS The percentage of dMMR tumors noted among Latino individuals (13%) is similar to estimates in non-Hispanic white individuals. In the current study, the majority of individuals with dMMR tumors were confirmed to have Lynch syndrome. Cancer 2017. © 2017 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. Cancer 2017;123:3732–3743. © 2017 American Cancer Society

The Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)/IGF-receptor pathway with its scaffolding proteins Insulin Receptor Substrate (IRS)1 and IRS2 are crucial regulators of metabolism and progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The goal of the study was the identification of predictive and prognostic markers among IRS1, IRS2, IGF1 and IGF-1R SNPs in mCRC patients enrolled in the FIRE-3 trial. Four SNPs of IRS (IRS1 rs1801278, rs1801123; IRS2 rs1805097, rs2289046) and four SNPs of IGF1-IGFR1 (rs6214, rs6220, rs2946834, rs2016347) were analyzed by PCR/direct-sequencing in the FIRE-3 trial. The relation of SNPs with PFS and OS was evaluated through Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test in the overall population and in subgroup according to RAS status and treatment arm. In the overall population IRS1 rs1801123 C/- carriers (N= 105) achieved significantly worse OS compared to T/T (N = 464) in univariate (HR = 1.32 [95%CI 1.03-1.70], p = 0.029) and in multivariable. Similar results were observed among RAS wild type. Patients with IGF1 rs2946834 T/- variant (N= 280) achieved improved PFS compared to C/C (N = 257) in univariate (HR = 0.77 [95%CI 0.64-0.92], p = 0.004) and in multivariable. In the RAS wild-type subgroup IGF1 rs2946834 T/- carriers showed better PFS and OS compared to C/C (univariate HR for PFS = 0.65 [95%CI 0.51-0.81], p

4103 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancers [BTC - including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gall bladder cancers (GBC)] represent a heterogeneous group of diseases. Glycoprotein-based tumor markers like alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA-19-9) though part of standard-of-care (SOC), lack sensitivity, and specificity. A fair proportion of these cancers do not produce these glycoproteins. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing can fill this void and be used for the assessment of molecular residual disease (MRD), as well as for surveillance purposes in patients with HCC or BTC. Prospective evaluation of this methodology in clinical practice has been limited to date. Methods: A personalized and tumor-informed multiplex PCR assay (Signatera bespoke mPCR NGS assay) was used for the detection and quantification of ctDNA. Serial time points were collected on a subset of patients to monitor their ctDNA levels in response to treatment. Results: Here we analyzed 200 plasma samples from a total of 90 patients with HCC (n=27) and BTC (n=63), comprising 46 patients with CCA and 17 patients with GBC. Sample-level ctDNA positivity rates, determined using a tumor-informed assay are presented in table. ctDNA detection was significantly associated with the stage of disease (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p

2592 Background: Study IT-01 (KEYNOTE-A10) evaluates INT230-6, a novel formulation of cisplatin (CIS) and vinblastine (VIN) with an amphiphilic cell penetration enhancer designed for intratumoral (IT) administration, alone or in combination with pembrolizumab (PEM), an antibody to PD-1. INT230-6 dosing is set by a tumor’s volume. In preclinical studies, INT230-6 increases drug dispersion throughout the tumor, allows drug diffusion into cancer cells and recruits dendritic, CD4 and CD8 T cells. The addition of PEM has been shown to improve these responses in models. Phase 1 data indicated INT230-6 alone induced tumor regression in both injected and non-injected lesions. Considering the large volume of drug injected and retained in the tumor, coupled with immune infiltration on biopsies, RECIST response methodology may not capture the benefit of INT230-6 treatment. Methods: IT-01 is an open-label phase 1/2 study, currently enrolling adult subjects with solid tumors in phase 2. INT230-6 was administered IT Q2W for 5 doses alone or with PEM 200mg Q3W. The study seeks to assess the safety and efficacy of IT INT230-6 alone and in combination with PEM. Results: 67 subjects have been enrolled (58 mono and 12 INT230-6 + PEM (3 started in mono, then received combo)) having a median of 3 prior therapies (0, 10). Median age was 60 (42, 85). 20+ cancer types were accrued; breast cancer and sarcoma were the most frequent. Over 500 image guided INT230-6 IT injections were given (253 to deep tumors) at doses of 0.3 to 172mL (86 mg CIS, 17.2 mg VIN) in a single session, which are higher amounts than typical IV doses. PK shows that 95% of INT230-6 active agents remain in the tumor. The most common (> 20%) related TEAEs for INT230-6 alone were localized pain (57%), nausea (36%), fatigue (29%) and vomiting (24%); with grade 3 TEAEs (> 1) of localized pain (5%) and anemia (3%). The safety in the combination was similar. There were no related grade 4 or 5 TEAEs. In evaluable monotherapy subjects (n = 43), the disease control rate (DCR) was 65% vs. 100% in PEM subjects (n = 5). Given the range of dose and entering tumor burden, an exploratory analysis of dose relative to tumor burden (TB) showed that subjects receiving a dose of INT230-6 < 50% of their reported TB (n = 30) had a mOS of 3.5 months. While in subjects receiving a dose of INT230-6 to ≥50% of TB (n = 37), mOS has not yet been reached after a median follow up of 9.5 months (HR: 0.26 (0.13,0.51)). Conclusions: INT230-6 is well tolerated when administered IT as monotherapy and combined with PEM. Given the challenge in assessing overall response rate following IT delivery, an exploratory analysis suggests prolonged survival for subjects receiving an INT230-6 dose ≥50% of their tumor burden compares favorably to the < 50% group and to literature accounting for prognostic factors (ECOG, LDH, # of metastatic sites). Clinical trial information: 03058289.

3021 Background: FID-007 (FID) consists of paclitaxel encapsulated in a polyethyloxazoline (PEOX) polymer excipient designed to enhance PK, biodistribution, and tolerability. In addition to allowing the drug to remain in solution until it can enter a cancer cell, the PEOX nanoparticle preferentially delivers paclitaxel to the tumor through the leaky hyperpermeable vasculature. In xenograft studies, FID reduced or limited tumor growth in multiple tumor types including lung, gastric, breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer. FID was more effective at lower or comparable taxane doses with fewer side effects. We present the first-in-human trial of FID. Methods: The study is evaluating the safety, PK, and efficacy of FID in pts with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective is to determine the MTD and RP2D. Pts received FID in doses between 15mg/m2 and 125mg/m2 using a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. FID was given IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Eligibility included ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, and no more than 3 prior lines of cytotoxic therapy for advanced disease. Results: Twenty-five pts were treated across 6 dose levels. Median age was 62 (44-76). ECOG PS was 2 in 1 pt and 1 in 64%. Median number of cycles was 2 (1-16). There were 2 DLTs of grade 3 rash at 100 mg/m2. Given the transient nature of the rash and response to topical therapy, DLT definition was modified to exclude grade 3 rash that lasts ≤ 7 days and additional patients were treated at 100 mg/m2 which was deemed tolerable. There was 1 DLT of grade 3 neutropenia at 125 mg/m2. All grade treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥ 25% of pts were rash (64%), alopecia (52%), pruritus (44%), anemia (44%) leukopenia, fatigue (40% each), dysgeusia, anorexia, nausea (32% each), and neutropenia (28%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurring in > 1 pt were anemia (20%), neutropenia, leukopenia, and maculopapular rash (16%). There were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity. Twenty-two pts were evaluable for response by RECIST 1.1 with a PR rate of 14% (PR in pancreatic, biliary tract and NSCLC) and disease control rate of 59%. PK is linear and dose proportional. There is no paclitaxel accumulation after weekly dosing, and the t1/2 is between 18-26 hours. Conclusions: FID has a manageable safety profile with MTD not reached. Accrual is continuing at 125 mg/m2. PK is linear, dose proportional and comparable to that of nab-paclitaxel. There is preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated pts across different tumor types. Enrollment in dose escalation continues. Combination studies with immunotherapeutic agents are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03537690.

11557 Background: Patients have limited treatment options following initial chemotherapy failure. INT230-6, a novel formulation of cisplatin (CIS) and vinblastine (VIN) with an amphiphilic cell penetration enhancer, is designed for intratumoral (IT) administration. Study IT-01 (BMS # CA184-592, NCT 03058289) evaluates INT230-6 alone or in combination with ipilimumab (IPI), an antibody to CTLA-4. INT230-6 dosing is set by a % of the volume of the tumor to be injected. The product has been shown to disperse throughout an injected tumor and diffuse into cancer cells. Cell death leads to recruitment of dendritic and T cells, the effect of which may be augmented by CTLA-4 inhibition as evidenced by increased efficacy of the combination in preclinical models. Historically, checkpoint inhibitors have limited activity in sarcoma. Considering the large volume of drug injected and retained in the tumor, coupled with immune infiltration on biopsies, RECIST response methodology may not capture the benefits of INT230-6 treatment. Methods: IT-01 is an open-label phase 1/2 study that is enrolling adult subjects with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic sarcoma. INT230-6 was administered IT Q2W for 5 doses alone or with IPI 3mg/kg IV Q3W for 4 doses. The study objectives are to assess the safety and efficacy of IT INT230-6 alone and in combination with IPI. Results: 16 heterogenous sarcoma subjects (13 monotherapy, 3 IPI combination) having a median of 3 prior therapies (0, 8) were enrolled to date. The INT230-6 dose was up to 145 mL (72.5 mg of CIS, 14.5 mg VIN) in a single session (an amount of each agent in excess of standard IV doses). The most common ( > 20%) related TEAEs in sarcoma subjects (n = 16) were localized pain (63%), fatigue (38%), decreased appetite (31%), nausea (31%), and vomiting (25%) most of which were low grade; with only grade 3 TEAE above 5% being anemia (13%). There were no related grade 4 or 5 TEAEs. In 11 evaluable monotherapy subjects, the disease control rate (DCR = CR+PD+SD) was 82%. Basket studies of sarcomas, including chordoma, with Royal Marsden Hospital index (RMHI) scores of 2 or higher report median overall survival (mOS) of 4 months. In this study 75% of monotherapy subjects had a RMHI score of 2 and preliminary estimates of mOS was 21.3 (4.67, NA) months. Pilot immunohistochemistry analysis of 5 paired (pre- and 28 days post-dose) biopsy samples showed substantial tumor necrosis, reduction of viable cancer, a decreased cancer proliferation as measured by Ki67, and increased TILs. Conclusions: Preliminary data shows that INT230-6 administered intratumorally alone or in combination with ipilimumab is well-tolerated in this small, heterogenous sarcoma population. The preclinical cancer cell death and immune infiltration mechanism of action appears to translate to sarcoma subjects. There are early signs of efficacy, DCR and potentially OS, that need to be confirmed in randomized studies. Clinical trial information: 03058289.

164 Background: For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing GEA, trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is the only approved HER2-targeted therapy, and they have limited treatment options after progression. Zanidatamab, a HER2-targeted bispecific antibody, has shown durable anti-tumor activity with good tolerability in a range of HER2-expressing cancers. Methods: In this 3-part Phase 1 study (NCT02892123), zanidatamab (10 mg/kg QW, 20 mg/kg Q2W, or 30 mg/kg Q3W) is administered as a single agent (Parts 1 & 2; QW or Q2W) or in combination with chemotherapy (Part 3; Q2W or Q3W). Eligibility criteria includes GEA with HER2 expression as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or IHC 2+, progression after standard of care therapy, and measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 (Part 2 requirement only). Results: In Parts 1 and 2, 36 GEA patients have been treated with zanidatamab (QW [n = 5]; Q2W [n = 31]). In Part 3, 26 GEA patients have been treated (zanidatamab Q2W + (paclitaxel [n = 11] or capecitabine [n = 6]); zanidatamab Q3W + capecitabine [n = 9]). Conclusions: Zanidatamab, both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy, is well tolerated with promising and durable anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated GEA patients (including prior HER2-targeted therapy). These data support further investigation of zanidatamab as a novel therapeutic for patients with HER2-expressing GEA. Clinical trial information: NCT02892123. [Table: see text]

299 Background: Treatment options are limited for patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic BTCs progressing after first line treatment. Standard second line chemotherapy yields objective response rates (ORR) of < 10% and median overall survival of these patients is < 6 months. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression/ amplification is observed in 5–19% of BTCs. Zanidatamab is a bispecific HER2-targeted antibody that has demonstrated durable single agent activity with good tolerability in a range of HER2-overexpressing cancers. Methods: In the expansion cohort of this phase I study (NCT02892123), the primary objective is to characterize safety and tolerability of zanidatamab and secondary objectives include evaluation of anti-tumor activity. This cohort includes BTC patients with centrally confirmed HER2 overexpression (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+/ fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]+), disease progression after standard of care therapy, and measurable disease per RECIST 1.1. Zanidatamab is administered at the previously identified recommended dose of 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W). Tumors are assessed every 8 weeks (response confirmed at ≥ 4 weeks). Results: As of the data cutoff date (Jul 28, 2020), 20 patients (median age: 63 years [range, 42–78]) with BTC (11 gallbladder cancers, 5 intra- and 4 extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinomas) have been treated with zanidatamab. The median number of prior systemic therapies was 2.5 (range, 1–8), including five patients who had received prior HER2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab). Fourteen (70%) patients experienced zanidatamab-related adverse events (AEs), all of which were grade 1 or 2 in severity. The most common (occurring in ≥ 20%) zanidatamab-related AEs were diarrhea (n = 9) and infusion-related reactions (n = 6). A single treatment-related serious AE of grade 2 fatigue was reported in one patient. Among patients evaluable for response (n = 17), the confirmed ORR was 47% (n = 8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23, 72), the disease control rate was 65% (n = 11; 95% CI: 38, 86) and the median duration of response was 6.6 months (95% CI: 3.2, not estimable). Conclusions: Zanidatamab is well tolerated with promising and durable anti-tumor activity in patients with HER2 overexpressing BTC. Based on these data, zanidatamab is now being evaluated in an ongoing global Phase 2b study in patients with advanced HER2+ BTC that have progressed after treatment with a gemcitabine-containing regimen (NCT04466891). Clinical trial information: NCT02892123.

Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass, which negatively affects quality of life and portends a poor prognosis. Numerous molecular substrates and mechanisms underlie the dysregulation of skeletal muscle synthesis and degradation observed in cancer cachexia, including proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL1, and IL6), and the NF-κB, IGF1/AKT/mTOR, and myostatin/activin–SMAD pathways. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that anti-cachexia drugs (such as MABp1 and soluble receptor antagonist of myostatin/activin) not only prevent muscle wasting but also may prolong overall survival. In this review, we focus on the significance of cachexia signaling in patients with cancer and highlight promising drugs targeting tumor cachexia in clinical development. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 3999–4004. ©2016 AACR.

Using approved methods, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are only isolated from blood in 30%–50% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. We previously validated a technique to isolate circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in a cohort of mCRC patients by combining immunomagnetic enrichment of EpCAM(+)/CD45(−) cells with qRT-PCR amplification of CK20 and survivin expression. Here, we examined the prognostic utility of CTC epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stem cell gene expression. An 8 ml blood sample was collected from 78 consecutive mCRC patients before treatment with investigational and standard chemotherapeutics. The mRNA expression of EMT (PI3Ka, Akt-2, Twist1) and stem cell (ALDH1) markers was measured. Associations between CTC gene expression and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using Cox regression models. Among patients without CK20 or survivin-expressing CTCs (n = 17), 55% had expression of ALDH1, PI3Ka and/or Akt-2. Patients with positive CTC Akt-2 expression had a significantly shorter median PFS (3.0 versus 4.0 months) compared with those without CTC Akt-2 expression in univariable (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.61; log-rank P =0.034) and multivariable analyses (HR= 1.70; adjusted P =0.041). In univariable analysis, CTC ALDH1 expression was associated with shorter OS (10.0 versus 38.6 months; HR = 2.04, P =0.021). Patients with CTCs expressing ALDH1, PI3Ka and/or Akt-2 had a significantly inferior PFS (3.0 versus 7.7 months; HR= 1.88, P = 0.015) and OS (10.0 versus 26.8+ months; HR = 2.25, P = 0.050) in univariable, but not multivariable, analysis. Conclusions: CTC Akt-2 expression may serve as a clinically useful prognostic marker in mCRC patients and warrants further evaluation in prospective trials.

// Martin D. Berger 1 , Dongyun Yang 2 , Yu Sunakawa 1 , Wu Zhang 1 , Yan Ning 1 , Satoshi Matsusaka 1 , Satoshi Okazaki 1 , Yuji Miyamoto 1 , Mitsukuni Suenaga 1 , Marta Schirripa 1 , Annika Medea Lenz 1 , Pierre Bohanes 1 , Afsaneh Barzi 1 , Jane C. Figueiredo 1, 2 , Diana L. Hanna 1 , Heinz-Josef Lenz 1, 2 1 Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Correspondence to: Heinz-Josef Lenz, email: lenz@usc.edu Keywords: age, ethnicity/race, sex, rectal cancer, survival Received: May 14, 2016 Accepted: July 01, 2016 Published: July 19, 2016 ABSTRACT Most studies report on colon and rectal cancers collectively, even though biologic and prognostic differences exist between these disease entities. Here, we investigated the effects of sex, age, and ethnicity/race on rectal cancer (RC) mortality by stage focusing on differences before and after 2004. Using the SEER database, we identified 105,511 patients diagnosed with RC from 1988-2012. Main outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). In patients with stage I-III RC, women achieved a longer DSS (HR 0.87, P < 0.001) than men, independent of age, from 1988-2012. In stage IV disease, the sex disparity favoring women was limited to the age 18-44 yr cohort (DSS HR 0.79, P < 0.001). The sex difference in DSS ( P interaction = 0.009) was significantly reduced from 2004 to 2012 across all ages. Hispanics and Native Americans with locoregional RC had inferior DSS relative to Whites from 1988-2003, but these differences were not evident from 2004-2012 ( P interaction = 0.001). Additionally, Asians with stage I-III RC had superior DSS from 2004 on compared to Whites. Mortality in African American patients improved modestly overall and remained significantly higher than other ethnicities/races across all stages. Sex disparities have narrowed in patients with metastatic RC, but persist in patients with stage I-III disease. These differences are most evident among young patients (18-44 years), where sex disparities have even widened in stage I-III disease. While outcomes have improved for Asians, Hispanics, and Native Americans with stage I-III rectal cancer, black-white disparities remain in all disease stages.

The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an important mechanism of resistance to angiogenesis inhibition. The ability of EMT pathway genetic variants to predict the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy is unknown. We analyzed associations between functional SNPs in EMT-related genes and outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients undergoing first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. A total of 220 mCRC patients were included in this study: 143 patients treated with first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy (bevacizumab cohort) and 77 patients treated with cetuximab-based chemotherapy (cetuximab cohort). SNPs in TWIST1 (rs2285682, rs2285681), ZEB1 (rs10826943, rs2839658), SNAIL (rs1543442, rs4647958), and E-cadherin (rs16260) genes were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. Patients carrying a TWIST1 rs2285682 G allele had a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) of 18.1 months and overall survival (OS) of 44.1 months compared with those with the T/T genotype, who had a median PFS of 13.3 months (HR, 0.57; P = 0.003) and OS of 29.2 months (HR, 0.53; P = 0.001) in the bevacizumab cohort. In multivariate analysis, associations between TWIST1 rs2285682 and PFS and OS remained significant. Among women, the G allele of TWIST1 rs2285682 (PFS HR, 0.39; P = 0.007; OS HR, 0.30; P = 0.001) and TWIST1 rs2285681 (PFS HR, 0.27; P < 0.001; OS HR, 0.25; P < 0.001) was associated with improved survival. No significant associations were found in the cetuximab cohort. Our findings suggest that TWIST1 polymorphisms are associated with survival in mCRC patients treated with first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and may serve as clinically useful biomarkers for antiangiogenic therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6); 1405–11. ©2016 AACR.