AbstractThe Sarvak Formation, as one of Iran's most important hydrocarbon reservoirs, has been deposited and evolved under active tectonic conditions in various regions of the Zagros, including the Persian Gulf. The present study aims to investigate the effects of tectonic activities on the facies characteristics and diagenetic history of the Sarvak Formation in the eastern and western regions of the Persian Gulf. Facies analysis results indicate the deposition of the Sarvak Formation on a carbonate platform of ramp type. In the eastern part of the Persian Gulf, sedimentary facies of the Mishrif Member (Upper Sarvak) are predominantly deposited in inner platform areas (lagoon, shoal, reef deposits), while facies of the Khatiyah Member (Lower Sarvak) are mainly found in deep and outer platform areas (outer ramp). In the western part of the Persian Gulf, the Sarvak Formation encompasses a spectrum of shallow to deep-water facies, with open marine facies (middle and outer ramp) being notably more abundant. Two lower-order sequences (fourth-order) and one higher-order sequence (third-order) have been identified in this formation, indicating a high correlation with other areas of the Zagros and the Arabian Plate. Diagenetic effects related to a palaeoexposure surface have been observed in the uppermost part of the Sarvak Formation in both the eastern and western regions of the Persian Gulf. Dissolution porosity, brecciation, and iron oxide staining are among the most important diagenetic processes associated with these exposure surfaces. The thickness of the Sarvak Formation shows considerable variations in different parts of the Persian Gulf. Additionally, sedimentary facies of this formation exhibit significant lateral variations. The changes in thickness and facies variability of the Sarvak Formation were directly related to basement structures, indicating their activity during the deposition of this formation in the Persian Gulf. These tectonic events have had a significant impact on the burial history of the Sarvak Formation. Ultimately, the culmination of these facies and diagenetic characteristics has influenced the reservoir quality of the Sarvak Formation in the study areas.Keywords: Sarvak Formation, Persian Gulf, Basement structure, Facies, Diagenesis, Palaeoclimate IntroductionFacies characteristics and sedimentary environment, diagenetic processes, and fractures are the most important factors affecting the quality of hydrocarbon reservoirs (Ahr 2008). Therefore, considering tectonic features as one of the most important influencing factors on all the mentioned characteristics is a necessity in any integrated reservoir study (Nelson 2001; Hollis 2011; Lai et al. 2021). During the Late Cretaceous, especially in the Cenomanian-Turonian interval, tectonics was one of the main factors controlling the sedimentary basin of the Zagros region (Alavi 2007; Farahpour and Hessami 2012). These changes in the tectonic regime caused the reactivation of faults and salt domes in the region, creating a period of highly dynamic tectonic activity (van Buchem et al. 1996, 2002, 2011; Immenhauser et al. 2000, 2001; Sharp et al. 2010; Hollis 2011; Vincent et al. 2015). The Sarvak Formation, the second most important oil reservoir in Iran, has been significantly influenced by the aforementioned tectonic events, affecting its deposition and diagenetic history in various parts of the Zagros region. This is evidenced by the considerable variation in thickness and facies changes of the Sarvak Formation across different areas of the Zagros (Farahpour and Hessami 2012; Mehrabi et al. 2015; Bagherpour et al. 2021; Sadeghi et al. 2023).This study aims to integrate sedimentological data, including facies studies, diagenetic processes, and sequence stratigraphy, with existing information about the tectonic setting of the Persian Gulf during the Late Cretaceous, to examine the impacts of tectonic factors on the facies characteristics and diagenetic evolution of the Sarvak Formation in the eastern and western regions of the Persian Gulf. Material & MethodsIn this research, core data, thin-section microscopy, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis results from two wells in two different fields in the eastern and western parts of the Persian Gulf, referred to as wells A and B, are utilized. The studied core length in Field-B is 23 meters, and in Field-A, it is 61 meters. The number of thin sections is 67 for Field-B and 265 for Field-A. The number of XRD analyses for well A is 28, and for well B, it is 12. The Embry and Klovan (1971) classification is used for the textural nomenclature of carbonate rocks. For facies analysis and reconstruction of the depositional environment, the standard model by Flügel (2013) is applied. The sequence stratigraphic division is based on the identification of certain significant surfaces (i.e., sequence boundaries and maximum flooding surfaces) that act as timelines in creating the chronostratigraphic framework of the target formation (Vail et al. 1977). In this study, the Transgressive-Regressive (T-R) sequence stratigraphy method is adopted for the depositional sequences of the Sarvak Formation. This method was mainly introduced by Curray (1964) and later developed by Embry and Johannessen (1993) and Embry (1993; 1995). Discussion of Results & ConclusionsThe Sarvak Formation was deposited in a carbonate ramp setting, which includes facies belts of the inner ramp, middle ramp, and outer ramp. Transitional facies between the inner and middle ramp areas are separated by the fair-weather wave base (FWWB). High-energy shoal complexes in the inner ramp are recorded in the Sarvak Formation (MF-5 and MF-6). These complexes are represented by grainstones and packstones containing benthic foraminifera, peloids, and skeletal fragments. The allochems of the shoal facies are mainly rudist debris and other bivalves, with less frequent fragments containing echinoderms, foraminifera, and peloids.The middle ramp facies assemblage encompasses a wide range of shallow to relatively deep marine facies, including mud to grain-supported (mudstone/wackestone to packstone) facies with planktic and benthic fossil assemblages (MF-1 and MF-7). Large benthic foraminifera and skeletal fragments (mainly bivalves and echinoderms) characterize packstones to wackestones attributed to the proximal middle ramp, while foraminifera (benthic and planktic) and skeletal fragments (mainly echinoderms, bryozoans, and red algae) characterize mudstones to wackestones in the distal middle ramp. Peloids and intraclasts are significant non-skeletal grains in these facies.The deep marine facies assemblage, including the outer ramp and basinal facies, forms a substantial part of the Upper Cretaceous carbonate sequences in the studied wells. They are recorded as low-energy, mud-dominated facies (mudstone to wackestone) where planktic organisms (such as planktic foraminifera and oligosteginids) are the dominant components (MF-2, MF-3, and MF-8). The outer ramp facies of the Sarvak Formation are primarily recorded as oligosteginid-rich and planktic foraminifera-rich (such as Hedbergella sp., Whitinella sp., Globigerinelloides sp., and Rotalipora sp.) mudstones to wackestones associated with middle ramp facies (distal parts).Diagenetic studies have shown that the Sarvak Formation has undergone marine diagenetic environments, meteoric diagenesis, followed by shallow and deep burial diagenesis. Based on the textural relationships of the diagenetic features and with the assistance of previous studies on the Sarvak Formation, the paragenetic sequence of the diagenetic characteristics of this formation is constructed.Due to local and regional sea level fluctuations during the Cenomanian-Turonian, the Sarvak Formation has experienced a complex diagenetic history in various parts of the Zagros region (Mehrabi and Rahimpour-Bonab 2014). Palaeoexposure surfaces had a major control on the diagenetic evolution of the Sarvak Formation (Rahimpour-Bonab et al. 2013; Hajikazemi et al. 2017; Mehrabi et al. 2022a, b). Depending on the presence or absence of palaeohighs (such as salt domes and horst structures), the number of these palaeoexposure surfaces and the intensity of the associated diagenetic alterations vary across different parts of the Zagros region.The four main stages of diagenetic evolution of the Khatiyah and Mishrif members of the Sarvak Formation are as follows:Stage 1: Marine transgression, sedimentation, and marine diagenesis of the Khatiyah Member in the early to mid-Cenomanian.Stage 2: Highstand of sea level, sedimentation, and marine diagenesis of the Mishrif Member in the mid- to late-Cenomanian.Stage 3: Relative sea level fall, emergence of the platform, exposure and meteoric diagenesis of the Mishrif Member at the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary.Stage 4: Deposition of shale facies in a lacustrine environment (Laffan Shale) during this stage.The diagenetic processes of the Sarvak Formation can be divided into two categories: 1) Diagenetic processes related to discontinuities, and 2) Diagenetic processes unrelated to discontinuities. Processes related to discontinuities represent a meteoric diagenetic environment and indicate exposure surfaces, such as extensive dissolution termed karstification, meteoric cementation, formation of paleosols, formation of pisoid horizons, dissolution-related brecciation and collapse, iron oxide staining, silicification, and neomorphism. Diagenetic processes unrelated to discontinuities include micritization, bioturbation, burial dolomitization, mechanical and chemical compaction, pyritization, and burial or marine cementation.Significant variations in the thickness of the Sarvak Formation from different parts of the Zagros sedimentary basin have previously been measured and reported by researchers (Mehrabi et al. 2015b). Additionally, remarkable changes in the nature of the facies and depositional sub-environments of the Sarvak Formation have also been reported from various regions of the Zagros (Esrafili-Dizaji et al. 2015). Similarly, such changes are clearly observable in terms of the thickness and facies of the Sarvak Formation in the eastern and western parts of the Persian Gulf. In the eastern Persian Gulf, salt domes have created the most significant tectonic structures, often associated with the formation of hydrocarbon fields in this area.In contrast, in the western part of the Persian Gulf, the pre-existing basement faults and uplifted structures (such as the Kharg and Mish anticlines, and the Hendijan–Bahregansar structures) are the most significant structural features and have formed the main traps for the accumulation of oil and gas in fields like Hendijan, Bahregansar, etc. (Kazem Shiroodi et al. 2015; Mohammadrezaei et al. 2020). On these pre-existing highs, the thinnest thickness of the Sarvak Formation has been recorded, and shallow-water facies dominate over them, indicating a shallower depositional environment on these highs. The changes of sedimentary facies in relation to these structures reflect their activity during the deposition of the Sarvak Formation in the eastern and western parts of the Persian Gulf.