6 results on '"Diack, Iain"'
Search Results
2. Towards a microbial process-based understanding of the resilience of peatland ecosystem service provisioning – a research agenda
- Author
-
Ritson, Jonathan P., Alderson, Danielle M., Robinson, Clare H., Burkitt, Alexandra E., Heinemeyer, Andreas, Stimson, Andrew G., Gallego-Sala, Angela, Harris, Angela, Quillet, Anne, Malik, Ashish A., Cole, Beth, Robroek, Bjorn J.M., Heppell, Catherine M., Rivett, Damian W., Chandler, Dave M., Elliott, David R., Shuttleworth, Emma L., Lilleskov, Erik, Cox, Filipa, Clay, Gareth D., Diack, Iain, Rowson, James, Pratscher, Jennifer, Lloyd, Jonathan R., Walker, Jonathan S., Belyea, Lisa R., Dumont, Marc G., Longden, Mike, Bell, Nicholle G.A., Artz, Rebekka R.E., Bardgett, Richard D., Griffiths, Robert I., Andersen, Roxane, Chadburn, Sarah E., Hutchinson, Simon M., Page, Susan E., Thom, Tim, Burn, William, Evans, Martin G., Ritson, Jonathan P., Alderson, Danielle M., Robinson, Clare H., Burkitt, Alexandra E., Heinemeyer, Andreas, Stimson, Andrew G., Gallego-Sala, Angela, Harris, Angela, Quillet, Anne, Malik, Ashish A., Cole, Beth, Robroek, Bjorn J.M., Heppell, Catherine M., Rivett, Damian W., Chandler, Dave M., Elliott, David R., Shuttleworth, Emma L., Lilleskov, Erik, Cox, Filipa, Clay, Gareth D., Diack, Iain, Rowson, James, Pratscher, Jennifer, Lloyd, Jonathan R., Walker, Jonathan S., Belyea, Lisa R., Dumont, Marc G., Longden, Mike, Bell, Nicholle G.A., Artz, Rebekka R.E., Bardgett, Richard D., Griffiths, Robert I., Andersen, Roxane, Chadburn, Sarah E., Hutchinson, Simon M., Page, Susan E., Thom, Tim, Burn, William, and Evans, Martin G.
- Abstract
Peatlands are wetland ecosystems with great significance as natural habitats and as major global carbon stores. They have been subject to widespread exploitation and degradation with resulting losses in characteristic biota and ecosystem functions such as climate regulation. More recently, large-scale programmes have been established to restore peatland ecosystems and the various services they provide to society. Despite significant progress in peatland science and restoration practice, we lack a process-based understanding of how soil microbiota influence peatland functioning and mediate the resilience and recovery of ecosystem services, to perturbations associated with land use and climate change. We argue that there is a need to: in the short-term, characterise peatland microbial communities across a range of spatial and temporal scales and develop an improved understanding of the links between peatland habitat, ecological functions and microbial processes; in the medium term, define what a successfully restored ‘target’ peatland microbiome looks like for key carbon cycle related ecosystem services and develop microbial-based monitoring tools for assessing restoration needs; and in the longer term, to use this knowledge to influence restoration practices and assess progress on the trajectory towards ‘intact’ peatland status. Rapid advances in genetic characterisation of the structure and functions of microbial communities offer the potential for transformative progress in these areas, but the scale and speed of methodological and conceptual advances in studying ecosystem functions is a challenge for peatland scientists. Advances in this area require multidisciplinary collaborations between peatland scientists, data scientists and microbiologists and ultimately, collaboration with the modelling community. Developing a process-based understanding of the resilience and recovery of peatlands to perturbations, such as climate extremes, fires, and drainage, will be key
- Published
- 2021
3. Towards a microbial process-based understanding of the resilience of peatland ecosystem service provisioning – A research agenda
- Author
-
Ritson, Jonathan P., primary, Alderson, Danielle M., additional, Robinson, Clare H., additional, Burkitt, Alexandra E., additional, Heinemeyer, Andreas, additional, Stimson, Andrew G., additional, Gallego-Sala, Angela, additional, Harris, Angela, additional, Quillet, Anne, additional, Malik, Ashish A., additional, Cole, Beth, additional, Robroek, Bjorn J.M., additional, Heppell, Catherine M., additional, Rivett, Damian W., additional, Chandler, Dave M., additional, Elliott, David R., additional, Shuttleworth, Emma L., additional, Lilleskov, Erik, additional, Cox, Filipa, additional, Clay, Gareth D., additional, Diack, Iain, additional, Rowson, James, additional, Pratscher, Jennifer, additional, Lloyd, Jonathan R., additional, Walker, Jonathan S., additional, Belyea, Lisa R., additional, Dumont, Marc G., additional, Longden, Mike, additional, Bell, Nicholle G.A., additional, Artz, Rebekka R.E., additional, Bardgett, Richard D., additional, Griffiths, Robert I., additional, Andersen, Roxane, additional, Chadburn, Sarah E., additional, Hutchinson, Simon M., additional, Page, Susan E., additional, Thom, Tim, additional, Burn, William, additional, and Evans, Martin G., additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Towards a microbial process-based understanding of the resilience of peatland ecosystem service provisioning – A research agenda
- Author
-
Ritson, Jonathan P, Alderson, Danielle M, Robinson, Clare H, Burkitt, Alexandra E, Heinemeyer, Andreas, Stimson, Andrew G, Gallego-Sala, Angela, Harris, Angela, Quillet, Anne, Malik, Ashish A, Cole, Beth, Robroek, Bjorn JM, Heppell, Catherine M, Rivett, Damian W, Chandler, Dave M, Elliott, David R, Shuttleworth, Emma L, Lilleskov, Erik, Cox, Filipa, Clay, Gareth D, Diack, Iain, Rowson, James, Pratscher, Jennifer, Lloyd, Jonathan R, Walker, Jonathan S, Belyea, Lisa R, Dumont, Marc G, Longden, Mike, Bell, Nicholle GA, Artz, Rebekka RE, Bardgett, Richard D, Griffiths, Robert I, Andersen, Roxane, Chadburn, Sarah E, Hutchinson, Simon M, Page, Susan E, Thom, Tim, Burn, William, Evans, Martin G, Ritson, Jonathan P, Alderson, Danielle M, Robinson, Clare H, Burkitt, Alexandra E, Heinemeyer, Andreas, Stimson, Andrew G, Gallego-Sala, Angela, Harris, Angela, Quillet, Anne, Malik, Ashish A, Cole, Beth, Robroek, Bjorn JM, Heppell, Catherine M, Rivett, Damian W, Chandler, Dave M, Elliott, David R, Shuttleworth, Emma L, Lilleskov, Erik, Cox, Filipa, Clay, Gareth D, Diack, Iain, Rowson, James, Pratscher, Jennifer, Lloyd, Jonathan R, Walker, Jonathan S, Belyea, Lisa R, Dumont, Marc G, Longden, Mike, Bell, Nicholle GA, Artz, Rebekka RE, Bardgett, Richard D, Griffiths, Robert I, Andersen, Roxane, Chadburn, Sarah E, Hutchinson, Simon M, Page, Susan E, Thom, Tim, Burn, William, and Evans, Martin G
- Abstract
Peatlands are wetland ecosystems with great significance as natural habitats and as major global carbon stores. They have been subject to widespread exploitation and degradation with resulting losses in characteristic biota and ecosystem functions such as climate regulation. More recently, large-scale programmes have been established to restore peatland ecosystems and the various services they provide to society. Despite significant progress in peatland science and restoration practice, we lack a process-based understanding of how soil microbiota influence peatland functioning and mediate the resilience and recovery of ecosystem services, to perturbations associated with land use and climate change. We argue that there is a need to: in the short-term, characterise peatland microbial communities across a range of spatial and temporal scales and develop an improved understanding of the links between peatland habitat, ecological functions and microbial processes; in the medium term, define what a successfully restored ‘target’ peatland microbiome looks like for key carbon cycle related ecosystem services and develop microbial-based monitoring tools for assessing restoration needs; and in the longer term, to use this knowledge to influence restoration practices and assess progress on the trajectory towards ‘intact’ peatland status. Rapid advances in genetic characterisation of the structure and functions of microbial communities offer the potential for transformative progress in these areas, but the scale and speed of methodological and conceptual advances in studying ecosystem functions is a challenge for peatland scientists. Advances in this area require multidisciplinary collaborations between peatland scientists, data scientists and microbiologists and ultimately, collaboration with the modelling community. Developing a process-based understanding of the resilience and recovery of peatlands to perturbations, such as climate extremes, fires, and drainage, will be key
- Published
- 2020
5. Synergies between site protection and agri‐environment schemes for the conservation of waders on lowland wet grasslands
- Author
-
Smart, Jennifer, primary, Wotton, Simon R., additional, Dillon, Ian A., additional, Cooke, Andrew I., additional, Diack, Iain, additional, Drewitt, Allan L., additional, Grice, Philip V., additional, and Gregory, Richard D., additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Synergies between site protection and agrienvironment schemes for the conservation of waders on lowland wet grasslands.
- Author
-
Smart, Jennifer, Wotton, Simon R., Dillon, Ian A., Cooke, Andrew I., Diack, Iain, Drewitt, Allan L., Grice, Philip V., Gregory, Richard D., and Burton, Niall
- Subjects
GRASSLANDS ,WILDLIFE conservation ,HABITATS ,ANIMAL breeding ,ANIMAL species ,DEMOGRAPHIC change - Abstract
Two conservation strategies have been put in place in Europe to address precipitous population declines of wading birds that breed on lowland wet grasslands. These are site protection and agri-environment schemes (AESs) and the two are rarely compared, or their synergy assessed. Increasingly, efforts to recover populations of previously widespread species follow a landscape-scale approach whereby habitat improvement takes place at key sites through partially overlapping protected area management and AESs. To investigate whether site protection and AESs improve the conservation status of breeding waders and how these interact, we partially repeated a 2002 survey of breeding waders on protected areas (nature reserves and Sites of Special Scientific Interest) and sites with wader-specific AES options in England in 2009 and 2010. We then assessed the individual and combined effects of these delivery mechanisms on field occupancy, breeding density and population change of four species of declining wader (Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus, Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago, Eurasian Curlew Arquata numenius and Common Redshank Tringa totanus). Although results for Curlew differed from the other species, in general field occupancy was positively influenced by conservation delivery mechanisms, with the highest occupancy and breeding densities on land where site protection was combined with wader-specific AES options. Field occupancy varied between different types of AES, with higher occupancy associated with higher-level options in fields, particularly those on nature reserves. Outside nature reserves, the history of AES management did not influence wader populations, but within nature reserves and on fields that gained AES management between 2002 and 2009–2010, populations of Curlew and Snipe were more likely to have persisted and population change in Snipe and Lapwing was more positive. We conclude that the conservation of breeding waders will be most effective when site protection and AES management are combined on the same land. Using limited AES money to support management for breeding waders on, around and between the existing network of protected sites will protect remaining populations while presenting opportunities for population expansion in future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.