Search

Limited research on diabetes education and support implementation in Appalachia, which is a critical knowledge gap considering barriers to care, and high prevalence rates. The aim was to understand what each facility is providing regarding diabetes education and services within West Virginia. This study reports cognitive interview qualitative findings from a multi-methods study. Individuals were recruited through an online search to identify clinics, organizations, and hospital staff that provided diabetes education in the state of West Virginia. Eligible participants were individuals who facilitated and managed diabetes education and support in counties of West Virginia. The interviews followed an 11-item interview guide, approved, and reviewed by a practicing Registered Dietitian and Certified Diabetes Care Education Specialist in West Virginia. All qualitative data from the interviews were hand-coded using grounded theory, by two researchers. 15 participating organizations from the state of West Virginia were included and described three phenomena: Diabetes Education Implementation (differences in: evaluation measures, modality, delivery format, topical areas); Barriers to Care (staffing, lack of training, evaluation, loss of research partnerships and funding); and Facilitators to Care (community-based involvement, interdisciplinary collaboration, capacity building (trainings). There are concerns with program drift and "risky" adaptations such as inconsistent evaluative measures, lack of training for program facilitators, variety of delivery formats, and content material. Findings recommend more alignment in program delivery to better implementation. Further studies should assess patient experiences with implemented diabetes education programs in West Virginia to further support the current research findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Diabetic ketoacidosis causes a significant number of hospitalisations worldwide, with rates tending to increase with remoteness and socioeconomic disadvantage. Our study aimed to explore healthcare professionals’ perceptions of factors affecting presentation of people with type 1 diabetes in a low socioeconomic area of Queensland, Australia. Methods This was a qualitative study. Individual semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interviews were completed with patients with type 1 diabetes who had presented in diabetic ketoacidosis, and healthcare professionals who have experience in related care. Data were analysed using Gibbs’s framework of thematic analysis. Results Four patients with type 1 diabetes and 18 healthcare professionals were interviewed. Restricted access was identified as a factor contributing to diabetic ketoacidosis and delayed presentation, with ketone testing supplies, continuous glucose monitoring technology and transport considered barriers. Many of these factors were arguably preventable. Opportunities to improve the care available to patients with type 1 diabetes were detailed, with particularly strong support for dedicated out of hours telephone help lines for adults with type 1 diabetes. Conclusions Gaps in support for patient self-care to avoid diabetic ketoacidosis presentations and prevent late presentation of diabetic ketoacidosis revealed by this study require service reconfiguration to support care delivery. Until change is made, people with type 1 diabetes will continue to make both avoidable and delayed, acutely unwell, presentations to Emergency Departments.

Background: Diabetic ketoacidosis causes a significant number of hospitalisations worldwide, with rates tending to increase with remoteness and socioeconomic disadvantage. Our study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of factors affecting presentation of people with type 1 diabetes in a low socioeconomic area of Queensland, Australia.Methods: This was a qualitative study. Individual semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interviews were completed with patients with type 1 diabetes who had presented in diabetic ketoacidosis, and healthcare professionals who have experience in related care. Data were analysed using Gibbs's framework of thematic analysis.Results: Four patients with type 1 diabetes and 18 healthcare professionals were interviewed. Restricted access was identified as a factor contributing to diabetic ketoacidosis and delayed presentation, with ketone testing supplies, continuous glucose monitoring technology and transport considered barriers. Many of these factors were arguably preventable. Opportunities to improve the care available to patients with type 1 diabetes were detailed, with particularly strong support for dedicated out of hours telephone help lines for adults with type 1 diabetes.Conclusions: Gaps in support for patient self-care to avoid diabetic ketoacidosis presentations and prevent late presentation of diabetic ketoacidosis revealed by this study require service reconfiguration to support care delivery. Until change is made, people with type 1 diabetes will continue to make both avoidable and delayed, acutely unwell, presentations to Emergency Departments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetes prevalence in Tanzania was estimated at 9.1% in 2012 among adults aged 24-65 years - higher than the HIV prevalence in the general population at that time. Health systems in lower- and middle-income countries are not designed for chronic health care, yet the rising burden of non-communicable diseases such as diabetes demands chronic care services. To inform policies on diabetes care, we conducted a study on the health services in place to diagnose, treat and care for diabetes patients in rural Tanzania. The study was an exploratory and descriptive study involving qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, observations and document reviews) and was conducted in a rural district in Tanzania. Fifteen health providers in four health facilities at different levels of the health care system were interviewed. The health care organization elements of the Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions (ICCC) framework were used to guide assessment of the diabetes services in the district. We found that diabetes care in this district was centralized at the referral and district facilities, with unreliable supply of necessary commodities for diabetes care and health providers who had some knowledge of what was expected of them but felt ill-prepared for diabetes care. Facility and district level guidance was lacking and the continuity of care was broken within and between facilities. The HMIS could not produce reliable data on diabetes. Support for self-management to patients and their families was weak at all levels. In conclusion, the rural district we studied did not provide diabetes care close to the patients. Guidance on diabetes service provision and human resource management need strengthening and policies related to task-shifting need adjustment to improve quality of service provision for diabetes patients in rural settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The central principle of the NHS, when launched in 1948, was to provide services free for all at the point of delivery. A noble pledge indeed, but with continuing medical advances and an increasingly ageing population, the sustainability of this principle has become a major challenge. The NHS is changing and those working within this institution will need to embrace these changes if both they and the NHS are to survive. As financial pressures continue to put the NHS under threat, the need to build an NHS that is fit for the 21st century has never been greater and spending money wisely will be high on the agenda. Specialist nurses in all fields need to make sure they have evidence to prove they are both cost effective and enhancing services; otherwise another provider may step in and take over their role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective To examine the provision, and variations in, secondary care diabetes services in the UK. Methodology and participants A postal survey of all 238 identified secondary care providers of diabetes services in 2000. Results Following two reminders, a 77% response rate was achieved. Major deficiencies in core staffing levels were recorded, with 36% of services provided by only one consultant physician with an interest in diabetes. The provision of diabetes specialist nurses was less than recommended in 87% of responses, whereas podiatry and dietetic support was unavailable in 3% and 27% of responses, respectively. Diabetes registers were not present in 28%, and a co-ordinated retinopathy screening programme unavailable in 26% of responses. Key biochemical measurements were unavailable in 9% (microalbuminuria) to 18% (HDL-cholesterol) of responses. A ‘Well-Resourced Service’ score was devised taking account of levels of personnel, facilities and specialized clinical services. There was a significant geographical variation in this score (P < 0.001), with the lowest score (least well-resourced services) in the Eastern NHS Region of England, and the highest score in the North-west NHS Region of England. The ‘Well-Resourced Service’ score was also significantly lower (P < 0.05) where there were less than two whole-time consultant physicians providing diabetes services. In contrast to other aspects of service provision, availability of dieticians and a combined diabetes–ophthalmology service had declined since 1990. Of 245 recorded bids for resources and service improvements for diabetes care, the success rate overall was 44%, and lowest where bids were made for dietetic and podiatry support. Conclusions There is presently a major shortfall in provision of secondary care diabetes services throughout the UK, with evidence that there is significant regional variation and less facilities and resources where there are less... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]