Search

Introduction: Hemostasis following large-bore femoral vein access remains a challenge. Manual compression has been the standard of care but requires bedside staff, prolonged bed rest, and longer length of stay. The LockeT is an external compression device that attempts to address these issues while achieving venous hemostasis., Objectives: We evaluate postprocedural hemostasis and vascular closure outcomes after using LockeT following cardiac electrophysiologic procedures., Methods: We performed a single-center, observational study of patients who underwent vascular closure for electrophysiology procedures using LockeT. Postprocedural outcomes were subsequently analyzed., Results: We studied 102 patients (N) for whom LockeT was used to close 182 separate vascular access sites (n). Common procedures were atrial fibrillation ablation (56.9%, N = 58) and left atrial appendage occlusion (28.4%, N = 29). Most often, 8-Fr [48.3% (n = 126)], 11-Fr [27.2% (n = 71)], and 8.5-Fr [16.9% (n = 44)] sheaths were used, with an average procedure time of 82.1 ± 29.4 min. Hemostasis was achieved in 97.8% (n = 187) of all LockeT cases. Time to ambulation and discharge were 3.93 ± 1.10 h and 8.1 ± 4.4 h, respectively. No major complications were noted. Postprocedurally, 52% (N = 53) of patients were discharged on the same day. There were no differences in hemostasis (p = .859) or ambulation times (p = .202) between procedure types., Conclusion: The LockeT can effectively close venous access sites with no major complications., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia reported worldwide. There is significant heterogeneity in AF care pathways for a patient seen in the emergency room, impacting access to guideline-driven therapies., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the difference in AF outcomes between those treated with an organized treatment pathway vs routine-care approach., Methods: The emergency room to electrophysiology service study (ER2EP) is a multicenter, prospective observational registry (NCT04476524) enrolling patients with AF from sites where a pathway for management of AF was put in place compared to sites where a pathway was not in place within the same health system and the same physicians providing services at all sites. Multivariable regression modeling was performed to identify predictors of clinical outcomes. Beta coefficient or odds ratio was reported as appropriate., Results: A total of 500 patients (ER2EP group, n = 250; control group, n = 250) were included in the study. The mean age was 73.4 ± 12.9 years, and 52.2% were males. There was a statistically significant difference in primary endpoint [time to ablation (56 ± 50.9 days vs 183.3 ± 109.5 days; P  < 0.001), time to anticoagulation initiation (2.1 ± 1.6 days vs 19.7 ± 35 days, P  < 0.001), antiarrhythmic drug initiation (4.8 ± 7.1 days vs 24.7 ± 44.4 days, P  < 0.001) compared to the control group, respectively. As such, this resulted in reduced length of stay in the ER2EP group compared to the control group (2.4 ± 1.4 days vs 3.23 ± 2.5 days, P  = 0.002)., Conclusions: This study provides evidence that having an organized pathway from the emergency department for AF patients involving electrophysiology services can improve early access to definitive therapies and clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: This study was supported by an unrestricted research grant from 10.13039/100007497Biosense Webster Inc and sponsored by the Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute. Dr Lakkireddy is on the Speakers Bureau of Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Inc, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and has received honoraria/speaking/consulting fees from Abbott, Acutus, AtriCure Inc, Medtronic Inc, Philips, Biotronik, and Cardiovia. Dr Garg has received honoraria/speaking/consulting fees from Biosense Webster and Medtronic. Dr Gopinathannair has received honoraria/speaking/consulting fees from Sanofi, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Inc, Zoll Medical Corporation, Pfizer, Inc, and the Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning. Dr DiBiase has received honoraria/speaking/consulting fees from Baylis Medical Company, Biosense Webster, Inc, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Biotronik, Rhythm Management Group Corp, and Zoll Medical Corporation. Dr Al-Ahmad has received honoraria/speaking/consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Inc, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Mediasphere Medical, Medtelligence, and Biosig Technologies. Dr Natale has received honoraria/speaking/consulting fees from Medtronic, Biosense Webster, Inc, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Baylis Medical Company, and Biotronik. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Bilateral cardiac sympathetic denervation (BCSD) for refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias is a neuromodulatory intervention targeting sympathetically driven focal or re-entrant ventricular arrhythmias., Objectives: This study sought to provide a more complete and successful option for intervention in patients in whom premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation is not feasible or has been unsuccessful., Methods: A total of 43 patients with >5% PVC burden and concomitant nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) who previously failed medical and ablation therapies were referred for BCSD. All patients underwent bilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical approach with T1-T4 sympathectomy. Primary effectiveness endpoints were postprocedural PVC burden resolution, improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and cessation of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Safety endpoints included peri- and postprocedural complications. Outcomes were assessed over a 1-year follow-up period., Results: Among the 43 patients who underwent BCSD, the mean age was 52.3 ± 14.7 years, 69.8% of whom were male patients. Presenting mean LVEF was 38.7% ± 7.8%, and PVC burden was 23.7% ± 9.9%. There were significant reductions in PVC burden postprocedurally (1.3% ± 1.1% post-BCSD, compared with 23.7% ± 9.9% pre-BCSD, P < 0.001) and improvements in LVEF (46.3% ± 9.5% post-BCSD, compared with 38.7% ± 7.8% pre-BCSD, P < 0.001). The rate of ICD therapies decreased from 81.4% (n = 35) to 11.6% (n = 5) (P < 0.001), leading to a significant reduction in use of AADs (100.0% to 11.6%, P < 0.001) and improvement in mean NYHA functional class (2.5 ± 0.5 to 1.4 ± 0.2, P < 0.001). Major intraoperative complications were seen in 4.7% of patients (hemothorax and chylothorax). Of the patients, 81.4% (n = 35) experienced no mortality or major complications over a 1-year follow-up period, with the remaining still within their first year postprocedure., Conclusions: BCSD is effective for the management of refractory PVCs and ventricular tachycardia who have failed previous ablation therapy., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Lakkireddy has served as consultant for Abbott, Acutus, AltaThera, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, and Medtronic. Dr Pothineni has received speaking honoraria from Boston Scientific. Dr Gopinathannair has served as consultant and has received honoraria from Abbott Medical, and Sanofi; and has served on an advisory board for Pacemate. Dr Natale has served as consultants for Medtronic, Abbott, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Acutus. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction/aims: Given the widespread use of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) to measure disease progression in ALS and recent reports demonstrating its poor sensitivity, we aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale and speech item to detect validated clinical ratings of dysarthria in individuals with ALS., Methods: Paired ALSFRS-R and validated Speech Intelligibility Test (SIT) data from individuals with ALS were analyzed. Trained raters completed duplicate, independent, and blinded ratings of audio recordings to obtain speech intelligibility (%) and speaking rate (words per minute, WPM). Binary dysarthria profiles were derived (dysarthria ≤96% intelligible and/or <150 WPM). Data were obtained using the Kruskal-Wallis test, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity percentages, and positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV)., Results: A total of 250 paired SIT and ALSFRS-R data points were analyzed. Dysarthria was confirmed in 72.4% (n = 181). Dysarthric speakers demonstrated lower ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale (8.9 vs. 11.2) and speech item (2.7 vs. 3.7) scores (P < .0001). The ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale score had an AUC of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 0.86). A subscale score of ≤11 yielded a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 57%, PPV of 84%, and NPV of 60% to correctly identify dysarthria status. The ALSFRS-R speech item score demonstrated an AUC of 0.81 to detect dysarthria (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85), with sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 75%, PPV of 89%, and NPV of 58% for a speech item cutpoint of ≤3., Discussion: The ALSFRS-R bulbar and speech item subscale scores may be useful, inexpensive, and quick tools for monitoring dysarthria status in ALS., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Electrophysiology studies and ablation procedures require strength, steadiness, and dexterity to manipulate catheters. We have previously described a novel catheter torque tool (Peritorq) that improves torqueability and stability and decreases user muscle fatigue. The objective was to evaluate measures of catheter integrity with and without the torque tool in place using multiple diagnostic and ablation catheters in an adult porcine model., Methods: Diagnostic and ablation catheters were inserted through the femoral or jugular vein into areas of the right atrium, coronary sinus (CS), and right ventricle. Electrical measurements including impedance, sensing, and capture thresholds were obtained with and without the torque tool. Ablation lesions (30 s) were given at different locations using both irrigated and nonirrigated catheters and measurements were recorded with and without the torque tool., Results: Procedures were performed in eight adult pigs. Measurements with and without the torque tool in all locations did not differ significantly using any of the catheters. With the nonirrigated ablation catheter there was a significant difference in maximum (mean 1.7 W, p = .03) and average power (mean 9.1 W, p = .04) delivery at the PS tricuspid valve, but there were no other differences with the irrigated or nonirrigated catheters. Subjective assessment by the operator revealed a substantial improvement in maneuverability, ability to transfer torque, and stability within the cardiac space., Conclusion: In an in-vivo environment, a novel catheter torque tool subjectively improved catheter manipulation and did not have a significant impact on the integrity of electrophysiologic catheters. Further study including additional catheters and in-vivo human testing is indicated., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

After implementing a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection prevention bundle, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of non-severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (non-SARS-CoV-2) hospital-acquired respiratory viral infection (HA-RVI) was significantly lower than the IRR from the pre-COVID-19 period (IRR, 0.322; 95% CI, 0.266-0.393; P < .01). However, HA-RVIs incidence rates mirrored community RVI trends, suggesting that hospital interventions alone did not significantly affect HA-RVI incidence.

Although reductions in lingual strength are reported in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) that are associated with dysphagia; determination of a functional lingual pressure threshold (FLPT) has not yet been established. The present study therefore sought to identify an FLPT for impaired swallowing safety and efficiency in individuals with ALS.Thirty individuals with ALS completed a standardized videofluoroscopic swallowing examination and maximum anterior isometric lingual pressure testing using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument. Duplicate, blinded ratings of the validated Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores and Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT) were performed. Binary classifications of safety (unsafe: PAS: ≥ 3) and efficiency (inefficient: ≥ 3% worst total pharyngeal residue) were derived. Descriptives and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) were performed.Unsafe and inefficient swallowing were instrumentally confirmed in 57% and 70% of ALS patients, respectively. Across the entire cohort, the mean maximum lingual physiologic capacity was 32.1 kilopascals ('kPa'; SD: 18.1 kPa). The identified FLPT for radiographically confirmed unsafe swallowing was 43 kPa (sensitivity: 94%, specificity: 62%, AUC 0.82, p = 0.003). FLPT for inefficient swallowing was 46 kPa (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 56%, AUC = 0.77, p = 0.02).These data provide preliminary FLPT data in a small cohort of individuals with ALS that need to be further investigated in larger cohorts to inform clinical screening practices., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Swallow and cough dysfunction are possible surgical complications of lung transplantation (LT). We examined voluntary cough strength, sensorimotor reflexive cough integrity, and swallow-related respiratory rate (RR) across swallowing safety and aspiration response groups in recovering LT recipients., Methods: Forty-five LT recipients underwent flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing indexed by the validated Penetration Aspiration Scale. RR before and after a 3-ounce water drinking task was measured. Voluntary and reflexive cough screening were performed to index motor and sensory outcomes. T-tests, one-way ANOVAs, and chi-square (odds ratios) were used., Results: 60% of patients exhibited laryngeal penetration (n = 27) and 40% demonstrated tracheal aspiration (n = 18); 72% (n = 13) demonstrated silent aspiration. Baseline RR was higher in aspirators versus non-aspirators (26.5 vs. 22.6, p = 0.04) and in silent aspirators compared to non-silent aspirators (27.9 vs. 20.7, p = 0.01). RR change post-swallowing did not differ between aspiration response groups; however, it was significantly higher in aspirators compared to non-aspirators (3 vs. -2, p = 0.02). Compared to non-silent aspirators, silent aspirators demonstrated reduced voluntary cough peak expiratory flow (PEF; 166 vs. 324 L/min, p = 0.01). PEF, motor and urge to cough reflex cough ratings did not differ between aspirators and non-aspirators. Silent aspirators demonstrated a 7.5 times higher odds of failing reflex cough screening compared to non-silent aspirators (p = 0.07)., Conclusions: During the acute recovery period, all LT participants demonstrated some degree of unsafe swallowing and reduced voluntary cough strength. Silent aspirators exhibited elevated RR, reduced voluntary cough physiologic capacity to defend the airway, and a clinically distinguishable blunted motor response to reflex cough screening., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Although reduced lingual strength is a confirmed early manifestation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), its functional impact on swallowing remains unclear. We therefore sought to examine relationships between maximum anterior isometric lingual pressure (MAIP) with swallowing safety, swallowing efficiency, and swallowing timing metrics in a large cohort of individuals with ALS., Methods: Ninety-seven participants with ALS completed a standardized videofluoroscopic swallowing examination (VF) and lingual pressure testing (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument). Duplicate and blinded ratings of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT) percent efficiency (%C2-C4 2 ) and timing (laryngeal vestibule closure (LVC) duration: amount of time (milliseconds, msec) between LVC onset and laryngeal vestibule opening; time-to-LVC: hyoid burst to onset of LVC (msec); and swallow reaction time: interval between bolus passing ramus of mandible and onset of LVC (msec)) were performed across bolus trials. Swallowing safety (safe PAS: 1, 2, 4; unsafe PAS: 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8) and efficiency (inefficient: ≥3% worst total residue) were derived. Statistical analyses including descriptives, binary logistic regressions, and Spearman's rho correlations were performed (α = 0.05)., Key Results: Mean MAIP was 36.3 kPa (SD: 18.7). Mean MAIP was higher in those with safe swallowing as compared to those who penetrated (mean difference: 12 kPa) or aspirated (mean difference: 18 kPa). Individuals with efficient swallowing demonstrated higher MAIP than those with inefficient swallowing (mean difference: 11 kPa). Binary logistic regression analyses revealed increasing MAIP was significantly associated with a 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03-1.09) and 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.06) greater odds of safe and efficient swallowing, respectively. No relationships were observed between MAIP and swallow reaction time across all bolus trials. Longer time-to-LVC (5 ml thin liquid: r s  = -0.35, p = 0.002; cup sip thin liquid: r s  = -0.26, p = 0.02; moderately thick liquid: r s  = -0.28, p = 0.01) and prolonged LVC duration (cup sip thin liquid, r s  = -0.34, p = 0.003) were associated with lower MAIP., Conclusions and Inferences: Reduced lingual strength was confirmed in this group of 97 individuals with ALS that was associated with a diminished ability to effectively transport boluses and aide in laryngeal vestibule closure to prevent entry of material into the airway., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a considerable impact on US healthcare systems, straining hospital resources, staff, and operations. However, a comprehensive assessment of the impact on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) across different hospitals with varying level of infectious disease (ID) physician expertise, resources, and infrastructure is lacking., Methods: This retrospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study included central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs), and ventilator-associated events (VAEs) from 53 hospitals (academic and community) in Southeastern United States from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2021. Segmented negative binomial regression generalized estimating equations models estimated changes in monthly incidence rates in the baseline (01/2018-02/2020) compared to the pandemic period (03/2020-03/2021, further divided into three pandemic phases)., Results: CLABSIs and VAEs increased by 24% and 34%, respectively, during the pandemic period. VAEs increased in all phases of the pandemic, while CLABSIs increased in later phases of the pandemic. CDI trend increased by 4.2% per month in the pandemic period. On stratifying the analysis by hospital characteristics, the impact of the pandemic on healthcare-associated infections was more significant in smaller sized and community hospitals. CAUTIs did not change significantly during the pandemic across all hospital types., Conclusions: CLABSIs, VAEs, and CDIs increased significantly during the pandemic, especially in smaller community hospitals, most of which lack ID physician expertise. Future efforts should focus on better understanding challenges faced by community hospitals, strengthening the infection prevention infrastructure, and expanding the ID workforce, particularly to community hospitals., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. S. D. A. reports grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH) (NIDDK K12DK100024), Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, and Duke Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (NIA P30AG028716), as well as consulting fees from Locus Biosciences, Sysmex America, GSK, IPEC Experts (co-owner), and Infectious Diseases Society of America unrelated to this article; including payment or honoraria for lectures, from Brooks Army Medical Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, SOVAH Danville Medical Center, Regional TN Stewardship Conference/Belmont University, and GSK (paid to author), support for attending meetings and/or travel from SHEA/IDSA, DICON hospital visits, and Belmont University (Reimbursement to author); leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group for SHEA Research Committee, LEAP Fellowship Steering committee (paid to author), IDSA Stewardship Workgroup, ASHE editorial board, and SHEA Program Planning Committee. R. W. M. reports grants from CDC and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (paid to institution), and royalties from UpToDate outside this work; including payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from North Carolina Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, and is a member of the board for Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. D. J. A. reports grants from AHRQ, royalties from UpToDate, and ownership of Infection Control Education for Major Sports, LLC outside this work. E. D. A. reports grants or contracts from University of Maryland (paid to author 2019–2020), University of Chicago (ended in 2020), CDC Prevention Epicenter Program (paid to institution), Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (paid to author), US CDC (paid to institution), DASON Member Hospital Contracts (paid to institution), royalties or licenses from UpToDate (paid to author), consulting fees from American College of Clinical Pharmacy (paid to author), Hospital Association of New York State (paid to author, ended in 2019), Sarah Moreland Russell Consulting (paid to author), HealthTrackRX (paid to author); and support for attending meetings and/or travel from American Society of Microbiology (paid to author 2021), Pew Charitable Trusts (paid to author), and Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (paid to institution in 2019). D. J. W. reports grants or contracts from CDC—Epicenter and NIH—COVID mitigation K–12 schools, consulting fees from Pfizer, Sanofi, and Merck (for Vaccines) and PDI, Wellair, Germitec (for Disinfection), payment for expert testimony for cases related to contaminated heater cooler units, support for attending meetings and/or travel from SHEA and Pfizer, participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for GSK, and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group for SHEA. I. C. K. reports grants from NICHD – COVID-19 Mitigation in K–12 schools, and honorarium from Sovah Health—COVID-19 in Children. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: The study objectives were to determine the prevalence of swallowing impairment in adults after cardiac surgery and examine associated risk factors and health-related outcomes., Methods: A prospective single-center study was conducted in postoperative adult cardiac surgery patients with no history of dysphagia. A standardized fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing was performed within 72 hours of extubation. Blinded raters completed validated outcomes of swallowing safety and efficiency. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative health-related outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: In 182 patients examined, imaging confirmed inefficient swallowing (residue) in 52% of patients and unsafe swallowing in 94% (65% penetrators, 29% aspirators). Silent aspiration was observed in 53% of aspirators, and 32% did not clear aspirate material. Independent risk factors for aspiration included New York Heart Association III and IV (OR, 2.9; CI, 1.2-7.0); reoperation (OR, 2.0; CI, 0.7-5.5); transesophageal echocardiogram images greater than 110 (OR, 2.6; CI, 1.1-6.3); intubation greater than 27 hours (OR, 2.1; CI, 0.8-5.3); and endotracheal tube size 8.0 or greater (OR, 3.1; CI, 1.1-8.6). Patients with 3 or 4 identified risk factors had a 16.4 (CI, 3.2-148.4) and 22.4 (CI, 3.7-244.7) increased odds of aspiration, respectively. Compared with nonaspirators, aspirators waited an additional 85 hours to resume oral intake, incurred $49,372 increased costs, and experienced a 43% longer hospital stay (P < .05). Aspiration was associated with pneumonia (OR, 2.6; CI, 1.1-6.5), reintubation (OR, 5.7; CI, 2.1-14.0), and death (OR, 2.8; CI, 1.2-9.0)., Conclusions: Tracheal aspiration was prevalent, covert, and associated with increased morbidity and mortality., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: While dysarthria and dysphagia are known bulbar manifestations of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the relative prevalence of speech and swallowing impairments and whether these bulbar symptoms emerge at the same time point or progress at similar rates is not yet clear. We, therefore, sought to determine the relative prevalence of speech and swallowing impairments in a cohort of individuals with ALS and to determine the impact of disease duration, severity, and onset type on bulbar impairments., Method: Eighty-eight individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of ALS completed the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), underwent videofluoroscopy (VF), and completed the Sentence Intelligibility Test (SIT) during a single visit. Demographic variables including disease duration and onset type were also obtained from participants. Duplicate, independent, and blinded ratings were completed using the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale and SIT to index dysphagia (DIGEST ≥ 1) and dysarthria (< 96% intelligible and/or < 150 words per minute) status. Descriptive statistics, Pearson chi-squared tests, independent-samples t tests, and odds ratios were performed., Results: Dysphagia and dysarthria were instrumentally confirmed in 68% and 78% of individuals with ALS, respectively. Dysarthria and dysphagia were associated ( p = .01), and bulbar impairment profile distributions in rank order included (a) dysphagia - dysarthria (59%, n = 52), (b) no dysphagia - dysarthria (19%, n = 17), (c) no dysphagia - no dysarthria (13%, n = 11), and (d) dysphagia - no dysarthria (9%, n = 8). Participants with dysphagia or dysarthria demonstrated 4.2 higher odds of exhibiting a bulbar impairment in the other domain than participants with normal speech and swallowing (95% CI [1.5, 12.2]). There were no differences in ALSFRS-R total scores or disease duration across bulbar impairment profiles ( p > .05). ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale scores were significantly lower in individuals with dysphagia versus no dysphagia (8.4 vs. 10.4, p < .0001) and dysarthria versus no dysarthria (8.5 vs. 10.9, p < .0001). Dysphagia and onset type ( p = .003) and dysarthria and onset type were associated ( p < .0001)., Conclusions: Over half of the individuals with ALS in this study demonstrated both dysphagia and dysarthria. Of those with only one bulbar impairment, speech was twice as likely to be the first bulbar symptom to degrade. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the longitudinal progression of bulbar impairments in this patient population.

Background: Cardiac ablation catheters are small in diameter and pose ergonomic challenges that can affect catheter stability. Significant finger dexterity and strength are necessary to maneuver them safely. We evaluated a novel torque tool to reduce muscle activation when manipulating catheters and improve perceived workload of ablation tasks. The objective was to evaluate measurable success, user perception of workload, and muscle usage when completing a simulated ablation task with and without the use of a catheter torque tool., Methods: Cardiology attendings and fellows were fitted with surface electromyographic (EMG) sensors on 6 key muscle groups in the left hand and forearm. A standard ablation catheter was inserted into a pediatric cardiac ablation simulator and subjects navigated the catheter tip to 6 specific electrophysiologic targets, including a 1-min simulated radiofrequency ablation lesion. Time to complete the task, number of attempts required to complete the lesion, and EMG activity normalized to percentage of maximum voluntary contraction were collected throughout the task. The task was completed 4 times, twice with and twice without the torque tool, in semi-randomized order. A NASA Task Load Index survey was completed by the participant at the conclusion of each task., Results: Time to complete the task and number of attempts to create a lesion were not altered by the tool. Subjectively, participants reported a significant decrease in physical demand, effort, and frustration, and a significant increase in performance. Muscle activation was decreased in 4 of 6 muscle groups., Conclusion: The catheter torque tool may improve the perceived workload of cardiac ablation procedures and reduce muscle fatigue caused by manipulating catheters. This may result in improved catheter stability and increased procedural safety., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives/hypothesis: Quick, sensitive dysphagia screening tools are necessary to identify high-risk patients for further evaluation in busy multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinics. We examined the relationship between self-perceived dysphagia using the validated Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) and videofluoroscopic analysis of swallowing safety and efficiency., Study Design: Prospective, observational, longitudinal study., Methods: Individuals with ALS completed the EAT-10 and a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Duplicate, independent, blinded analyses of the validated Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale were performed to index swallowing safety and efficiency (mild dysphagia: DIGEST ≥ 1, moderate dysphagia: DIGEST ≥ 2). A between-groups analysis of variance with Games-Howell test for post-hoc pairwise comparisons was performed to examine EAT-10 scores across dysphagia severity levels. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive-negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and odds ratios (OR) were derived., Results: Four hundred and thirty five paired EAT-10 and DIGEST scores were analyzed. Mean EAT-10 score was 8.48 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.63-9.33). Individuals with dysphagia demonstrated higher EAT-10 scores (mild: 4.1 vs. 11.3, moderate: 6.0 vs. 17.5, P < .001). Mean EAT-10 scores increased across DIGEST levels (D0: 4.1, D1: 7.9, D2: 15.1, D3: 20.4, D4: 39.0). For mild dysphagia, an EAT-10 cut score of 3 was optimal: AUC 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69-0.78; sensitivity: 77%; specificity: 53%; PPV: 71%; NPV: 60%; OR: 3.5). An EAT-10 cut score of 7 optimized detection of moderate dysphagia: AUC 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87; sensitivity: 81%; specificity: 66%; PPV: 39%; NPV: 93%; OR: 8.1)., Conclusion: The EAT-10 is an easy-to-administer dysphagia screening tool with good discriminant ability for use in ALS clinics., Level of Evidence: 2 Laryngoscope, 132:2319-2326, 2022., (© 2022 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Background: Incomplete left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an evolving topic of clinical significance and thromboembolic potential, with recent long-term studies suggesting lower cutoffs for relevant leak size., Objectives: The aim of this prospective observational study was to assess 3 different closure techniques for persistent peridevice leaks after incomplete LAA closure and compare their efficacy and safety outcomes., Methods: We studied 160 patients (mean age 72 ± 9 years; 71% men) who underwent 1 of the 3 available modalities (detachable embolization coils, vascular plugs or septal occluders, and radiofrequency ablation) for residual central or eccentric leak closure. Both acute postprocedural success (closure or <1-mm leak at the end of the procedure) and closure at 1-year follow-up transesophageal echocardiography imaging were evaluated., Results: Of 160 patients, 0.6%, 41.3%, and 58.1% had mild (1-2 mm), moderate (3-5 mm), and severe (≥5 mm) leaks, respectively. Baseline LAA closure type was 72.5% Watchman FLX, 16.3% Lariat, 5.6% surgical ligation, 1.9% AtriClip, and 1.9% Amulet. Successful closure (0- or <1-mm leak) was seen in 100% of patients in all cohorts following intervention, with overall complete closure (0-1 mm) or mild or minimal leaks (1-2 mm) on 1-year follow-up transesophageal echocardiography seen in 100% of the atrial septal occluder or vascular plug cohort, 85.9% of the coil cohort, and 83.3% of the radiofrequency ablation cohort (P < 0.001). Two patients (1.3%) experienced cardiac tamponade, and there were no deaths or other complications., Conclusions: Peridevice leaks can safely and effectively be closed using 3 different modalities depending on size and location., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Garg is a consultant to Biosense Webster. Dr Pothineni is a consultant to Boston Scientific. Dr DiBiase is a consultant to Biosense Webster, Abbott, Atricure, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Biotronik. Dr Turagam is a consultant to Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific. Dr Gopinathannair is a consultant to Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. Dr Horton is a consultant to Abbott, Biosense Webster, Biotronick. Dr Kar is a consultant to Boston Scientific, and Edwards. Dr Fontana is a consultant to Boston Scientific, Abbott, Atricure, and Edwards. Dr Doshi is a consultant to Biosense Webster, Abbott, Atricure, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Biotronik. Dr Swarup is a consultant to Biosense Webster, Abbott, Atricure, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Biotronik. Dr Finn is a consultant to Boston Scientific and Abbott. Dr Reddy is a consultant to Biosense Webster, Abbott, Atricure, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Natale is a consultant to Biosense Webster, Abbott, Atricure, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Biotronik. Dr Lakkireddy is a consultant to Biosense Webster, Abbott, Atricure, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have significantly impacted the field of cardiovascular medicine, especially cardiac electrophysiology (EP), on multiple fronts. The goal of this review is to familiarize readers with the field of AI and ML and their emerging role in EP. The current review is divided into 3 sections. In the first section, we discuss the definitions and basics of AI, ML, and big data. In the second section, we discuss their application to EP in the context of detection, prediction, and management of arrhythmias. Finally, we discuss the regulatory issues, challenges, and future directions of AI in EP., (© 2022 Heart Rhythm Society.)

Background: We aimed to determine dysphagia profiles before and after lung transplantation (prevalence, incidence) and to examine predictors and health-related outcomes of aspiration in individuals undergoing lung transplantation., Methods: A retrospective single-center study of consecutive adults undergoing lung transplantation and completing a postoperative videofluoroscopic swallowing study between 2017 and 2020 was conducted. The validated penetration aspiration scale indexed swallowing safety and clinical outcomes were extracted from electronic medical records. T-tests, chi square with odds ratios, and multivariable logistic regression were conducted., Results: Two hundred five participants were identified who underwent lung transplantation and a postoperative swallowing exam. Of those who underwent both a pre- and postoperative swallowing exam (n = 170), preoperatively 83% demonstrated safe swallowing and 17% unsafe swallowing. Following lung transplantation, 16% demonstrated safe swallowing and 84% demonstrated unsafe swallowing (39% penetration, 45% aspiration). Independent predictors of postoperative aspiration were venous-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (odds ratio [OR]: 6.7, confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-81.5) and reintubation (OR: 4.5, CI: 1.0-60.3), p < .05. Compared to non-aspirators, aspirators demonstrated higher odds of being discharged to a dependent care setting (OR: 2.3, CI: 1.2-4.5), p < .05. Aspirators spent significantly longer NPO (median = 138.0 hours, 25th percentile, 75th percentile = 75.7, 348.3) compared to non-aspirators (median = 85.0 hours, 25th percentile, 75th percentile = 48.0, 131.6, p < .001)., Conclusions: Pre-existing dysphagia was low in this cohort of patients undergoing lung transplantation, however increased approximately 5-fold following lung transplantation and was associated with increased morbidity., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Dysphagia is a common complication of cardiac surgery (CS) contributing to morbidity and mortality. Although early dysphagia detection is important, no current screening guidelines or validated tools exist in the cardiac intensive care setting. We therefore aimed to examine the discriminant ability of the 3-ounce water swallow test (3 oz. WST) to detect aspiration in acute postoperative CS patients. 196 postoperative CS patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. Participants completed the 3 oz. WST and a standardized Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. Independent duplicate ratings of the penetration aspiration scale (PAS) were performed in a blinded fashion (100% agreement criteria). Receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed with sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) derived. Fifty-four CS patients (28%) were confirmed aspirators (PAS ≥ 6), of whom 48% (n = 26) were silent aspirators (PAS = 8). Both the sensitivity and specificity of the 3 oz. WST to identify instrumentally confirmed aspiration was 63% (AUC: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.72), and PPV was 39% and NPV 82%. The 3 oz. WST demonstrated fair discriminant ability to detect aspiration in acute postoperative CS patients. The high rate of silent aspiration may explain, in part, these findings given that the screening fail criteria include an overt cough response. In isolation, the 3 oz. WST does not represent a sensitive screen of aspiration in postoperative CS patients with a need to identify alternative screening tools for this setting., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: This study compared the concordance between two validated videofluoroscopic pharyngeal residue outcome scales used in clinical and research settings: the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) and the Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT) percent residue metric., Method: Two trained raters completed independent and blinded videofluoroscopic ratings of both DIGEST efficiency and ASPEKT percent pharyngeal residue outcomes for bolus trials of 5 cc Varibar thin liquid ( n = 223), thin liquid comfortable cup sips ( n = 223), and 5 cc Varibar thin honey ( n = 223). Spearman's rho and Kruskal-Wallis analyses were performed for each bolus type., Results: Significant associations between DIGEST and ASPEKT pharyngeal residue outcomes were noted for 5 cc thin ( r = .54, p < .001), cup sip thin ( r = .41, p < .001), and 5 cc thin honey ( r = .60, p < .001) bolus trials. ASPEKT percent residue increased across worsening DIGEST efficiency ordinal scale levels, with a main effect for each bolus type. Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences in the ASPEKT percent residue values between each DIGEST pairwise comparison for the thin cup sip bolus trial and for each pairwise comparison except between the moderate-to-severe (less than half vs. majority) ordinal levels for the 5 cc thin and 5 cc honey bolus trials, p < .05., Conclusions: Perceptual, ordinal (DIGEST) and quantitative, pixel-based (ASPEKT) videofluoroscopic pharyngeal residue outcomes were associated in this data set of 669 bolus trials. Future research is warranted to confirm these results.

Background: Given the need for quick and accurate dysphagia screening tools to optimize referral workflows and resource utilization in fast-paced multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinics, we evaluated the discriminant ability of the 3 oz. water swallow test (WST) to detect aspiration in individuals with ALS., Methods: A total of 212 paired 3 oz. WST (index test) and standardized videofluoroscopic swallow studies (reference test) were completed in individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of ALS. Blinded raters analyzed swallowing safety using the validated penetration-aspiration scale (PAS; non-aspirator: PAS < 6; aspirator: PAS ≥ 6). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated., Key Results: Index test: 78 (36.8%) WSTs were scored as a fail and 134 (63.2%) as a pass., Reference Test: Aspiration was confirmed in 67 (31.6%) reference tests with 145 (68.4%) reference tests verified as having no aspiration. Sensitivity and specificity of the 3 oz. WST to detect radiographically confirmed aspiration was 55.2% and 71.7%, respectively (AUC: 0.635, PPV: 47.4%, NPV: 77.6%)., Conclusions & Inferences: In this dataset, the 3 oz. WST did not demonstrate adequate sensitivity or specificity to detect aspiration in people with ALS as a stand-alone dysphagia screening tool., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Dysphagia is common in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and associated with reductions in quality of life and health-related outcomes. Despite the high prevalence of dysphagia in ALS, functional impairment profiles of swallowing safety and efficiency have not been comprehensively examined. We therefore aimed to determine the relative prevalence of unsafe and inefficient swallowing in a large cohort of individuals with ALS. We further sought to examine the impact of global and bulbar disease progression (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised "ALSFRS-R" total and bulbar scores, respectively), disease duration, and onset type on swallowing impairment profiles. One hundred individuals with ALS completed a standardized videofluoroscopic swallowing examination Two independent and blinded raters performed validated ratings of safety (Penetration-Aspiration Scale, PAS) and efficiency (Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics, and Timing, ASPEKT % residue). Binary classifications of safety (unsafe: PAS ≥ 3), efficiency (inefficient: total residue ≥ 3% of C2-4 2 ) and global swallowing status were derived. The ALSFRS-R was completed to derive ALSFRS-R total and bulbar subscale scores. Demographic data (disease duration and onset type) for each participant was also recorded.  Descriptives, 2 × 2 contingency tables with Fishers exact test, and independent samples t-tests were performed (α = 0.05). Prevalence of unsafe and inefficient swallowing was 48% and 73%, respectively. Global swallowing profiles were, in rank order: unsafe and inefficient (39%), inefficient but safe (34%), safe and efficient (18%), and unsafe but efficient (9%). There were no differences in global disease progression or disease duration across swallowing impairment profiles. ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale scores were significantly lower in unsafe versus safe swallowers, p < 0.05. Spinal onset patients had a greater proportion of safe swallowers as compared to bulbar onset patients (p = 0.000, Fisher's exact test). Both spinal and bulbar onset patients demonstrated a higher prevalence of inefficient swallowers as compared to efficient swallowers (p = 0.04, Fisher's exact test). Dysphagia was prevalent in this group of individuals with ALS. Approximately half demonstrated safety impairments and two-thirds had impairments in swallowing efficiency. Inefficient swallowing was approximately four times more likely to be the initial functional impairment in patients with one pathophysiologic functional impairment. A longitudinal study is needed to examine the temporal evolution of dysphagia in ALS., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: We aimed to determine the incidence and contributing risk factors of vocal fold mobility impairment (VFMI) in postoperative cardiovascular patients and evaluate the impact of VFMI on health-related outcomes., Methods: This single-site prospective study enrolled adults undergoing sternotomy or thoracotomy procedures who underwent a fiberoptic laryngoscopy examination within 72 hours of extubation. Potential demographic and surgical risk factors and health-related outcomes were collected. A blinded laryngologist assessed VFMI and mucosal injury. Descriptives, univariate and multivariable regression analyses with odds ratios (OR) were performed., Results: Of 185 eligible examinations, VFMI was confirmed in 25% of patients (7 complete, 39 partial VFMI) with left-sided involvement in 83% of cases. Laryngeal mucosal injury included granuloma (38%), posterior cricoid hypertrophy (37%), edema (29%), bruising (23%), and hemorrhage (9%). Independent risk factors for complete VFMI were aortic arch procedure (odds ratio 6.1), body mass index less than 25 (OR: 7.2), and African-American or Hispanic race (OR: 6.0). Patients with two or more identified risk factors had a 33.0 increased odds of complete VFMI compared with patients not having two or more risk factors. Compared with patients having normal vocal fold motion, patients with complete VFMI had a 2.7 increased odds of pneumonia, 5.7 higher odds of reintubation, a 7.3 times higher odds of death, and increased length of hospital stay and cost of care (P < .05)., Conclusions: Interdisciplinary postoperative care and laryngoscopy examination are recommended for high-risk patients to facilitate early detection and improve patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is the most commonly utilized instrument to index bulbar function in both clinical and research settings. We therefore aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale and swallowing item to detect radiographically confirmed impairments in swallowing safety (penetration or aspiration) and global pharyngeal swallowing function in individuals with ALS., Methods: Two-hundred and one individuals with ALS completed the ALSFRS-R and the gold standard videofluoroscopic swallowing exam (VFSE). Validated outcomes including the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) were assessed in duplicate by independent and blinded raters. Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were performed to assess accuracy of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale and swallowing item to detect radiographically confirmed unsafe swallowing (PAS > 3) and global pharyngeal dysphagia (DIGEST >1)., Results: Although below acceptable screening tool criterion, a score of ≤ 3 on the ALSFRS-R swallowing item optimized classification accuracy to detect global pharyngeal dysphagia (sensitivity: 68%, specificity: 64%, AUC: 0.68) and penetration/aspiration (sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 60%, AUC: 0.72). Depending on score selection, sensitivity and specificity of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale ranged between 34-94%. A score of < 9 optimized classification accuracy to detect global pharyngeal dysphagia (sensitivity: 68%, specificity: 68%, AUC: 0.76) and unsafe swallowing (sensitivity:78%, specificity:62%, AUC: 0.73)., Conclusions: The ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale or swallowing item did not demonstrate adequate diagnostic accuracy to detect radiographically confirmed swallowing impairment. These results suggest the need for alternate screens for dysphagia in ALS., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Antibiotic exposure can lead to unintended outcomes, including drug-drug interactions, adverse drug events, and healthcare-associated infections like Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Improving antibiotic use is critical to reduce an individual's CDI risk. Antibiotic stewardship initiatives can reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing (e.g., unnecessary antibiotic prescribing, inappropriate antibiotic selection), impacting both hospital (healthcare)-onset (HO)-CDI and community-associated (CA)-CDI. Previous computational and mathematical modeling studies have demonstrated a reduction in CDI incidence associated with antibiotic stewardship initiatives in hospital settings. Although the impact of antibiotic stewardship initiatives in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), including nursing homes, and in outpatient settings have been documented, the effects of specific interventions on CDI incidence are not well understood. We examined the relative effectiveness of antibiotic stewardship interventions on CDI incidence using a geospatially explicit agent-based model of a regional healthcare network in North Carolina. We simulated reductions in unnecessary antibiotic prescribing and inappropriate antibiotic selection with intervention scenarios at individual and network healthcare facilities, including short-term acute care hospitals (STACHs), nursing homes, and outpatient locations. Modeled antibiotic prescription rates were calculated using patient-level data on antibiotic length of therapy for the 10 modeled network STACHs. By simulating a 30% reduction in antibiotics prescribed across all inpatient and outpatient locations, we found the greatest reductions on network CDI incidence among tested scenarios, namely a 17% decrease in HO-CDI incidence and 7% decrease in CA-CDI. Among intervention scenarios of reducing inappropriate antibiotic selection, we found a greater impact on network CDI incidence when modeling this reduction in nursing homes alone compared to the same intervention in STACHs alone. These results support the potential importance of LTCF and outpatient antibiotic stewardship efforts on network CDI burden and add to the evidence that a coordinated approach to antibiotic stewardship across multiple facilities, including inpatient and outpatient settings, within a regional healthcare network could be an effective strategy to reduce network CDI burden., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) may provide incremental benefits for arrhythmia management in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF)., Objective: The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of endocardial ablation and LAA exclusion with LARIAT device for electrical and mechanical exclusion of LAA., Methods: We compared patients who underwent endocardial LAA isolation during index RFA for persistent AF and underwent a repeat RFA to patients who underwent LAA exclusion with LARIAT device followed by RFA for AF in this multicenter registry. Efficacy of electrical and mechanical isolation of LAA was assessed., Results: We included 182 patients of which 91 patients underwent endocardial LAA isolation during RFA for AF, and 91 patients underwent LAA exclusion with LARIAT device followed by RFA for AF. Baseline characteristics were similar except for higher CHA 2 DS 2- VASc score, coronary artery disease, and prior stroke rate in LARIAT arm. Persistence of electrical isolation (measured at beginning of second procedure) after LARIAT procedure was higher than one-time AF-RFA (96.7% vs 52.8%, p < 0.01). Acute pulmonary vein isolation rates were similar in both arms. AF recurrence rate after second isolation attempts at 1 year was similar in both arms. No difference in major complications was noted between both arms., Conclusions: LAA exclusion with LARIAT device appears to be more efficacious as compared to one-time endocardial ablation, but not compared to repeat isolation, in achieving complete electrical isolation of LAA for persistent AF.

Background: Currently, little is known about the onset, natural progression, and management of esophageal injuries after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation., Objectives: We sought to provide a systematic review on esophageal injury after AF ablation and identify temporal relationships between various types of esophageal lesions, their progression, and clinical outcomes., Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted until September 21, 2017. All AF ablation patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within 1 week of the procedure were included. Patients with esophageal lesions were classified into 3 types by using our novel Kansas City classification: type 1: erythema; type 2a: superficial ulcers; type 2b: deep ulcers; type 3a: perforation without communication with the atria; and type 3b: perforation with atrioesophageal fistula., Results: Thirty studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 4473 patients, 3921 underwent upper gastrointestinal evaluation. The overall incidence of esophageal injuries was 15% (570). There were 206 type 1 lesions (36%), 222 type 2a lesions (39%), and 142 type 2b lesions (25%). Six of 142 type 2b lesions (4.2%) progressed further to type 3, of which, 5 were type 3a and 1 was type 3b. All type 1 and type 2a and most type 2b lesions resolved with conservative management. One type 3a and 1 type 3b lesions were fatal., Conclusion: Based on our classification, all type 1 and most type 2 lesions resolved with conservative management. A small percentage (4.2% [6 of 142]) of type 2b lesions progressed to perforation and/or fistula formation, and these patients need to be followed closely., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Development of atrial fibrillation after certain cardiac procedures is a common medical problem. The inflammatory process plays an important role in the pathogenesis of post-cardiac procedure atrial fibrillation (PCP-AF). Colchicine, a potent anti-inflammatory agent, has been used in several studies to reduce the risk of PCP-AF. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the efficacy of colchicine in prevention of PC-PAF., Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library database and Google Scholar for RCTs, using terms "Atrial fibrillation, atrial, or fibrillation and colchicine". The primary end-point was the occurrence of AF post cardiac procedure, which includes cardiac surgery or pulmonary vein isolation. The safety end point was the occurrence of any side effects. Estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were evaluated., Results: A total of six RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, enrolling a total of 1257 patients. Colchicine significantly reduced the odds of PCP-AF (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.68, P<0.001, I 2 =0%). However, occurrence of side effects was significantly higher with colchicine when compared to placebo (OR 2.10; 95% CI, 1.34-3.30, P<0.001, I 2 =0%). The number needed to treat is 7 and the number needed to harm is 11.2. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment was 16%., Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that colchicine is an effective drug for prevention of PCP-AF. Colchicine could be considered as a prophylaxis to reduce PCP-AF, with some risk of treatment discontinuation due to the poor gastrointestinal tolerance (diarrhea)., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) is a common clinical condition characterized by abrupt cardiovascular autonomic changes resulting in syncope. This is a recurring condition with mixed results from current strategies of treatment., Methods: Subjects with a diagnosis of NCS were screened and enrolled. All the participants were given a DVD containing yoga videos and were instructed to practice yoga therapy for 60 min, three times a week for 3 consecutive months. Syncope functional status questionnaire score (SFSQS) was administered at the beginning and the end of the study. The subjects were followed for 3 months and underwent repeat tilt table testing at the end of the study., Results: Of the 60 patients screened, 44 subjects were enrolled, 21 in the intervention group and 23 in the control group. Most of the participants were females, and the mean age was 21 ± 3 years. In the intervention group, who finished the yoga regimen, there was a statistically significant improvement from control phase to the intervention phase, in number of episodes of syncope (4 ± 1 vs 1.3 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) and presyncope (4.7 ± 1.5 vs 1.5 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). The mean SFSQS also decreased from 67 ± 7.8 to 29.8 ± 4.6 (p < 0.001). All subjects had positive head up tilt table (HUTT) study at the time of enrollment compared to only six patients at the completion of intervention phase (10/100 vs 6/28 %, p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Yoga therapy can potentially improve the symptoms of presyncope and syncope in young female patients with NCS.

Background: A dry epicardial access (EA) is increasingly used for advanced cardiovascular procedures. Conventionally used large bore needles (Tuohy or Pajunk needle; LBN) have been associated with low but definite incidence of major complications with EA. Use of micropuncture needle (MPN) may decrease the risk of complications. We intended to compare the outcomes of LBN with MPN for EA., Methods and Results: We report a multicenter observational study of consecutive patients who underwent EA for ventricular tachycardia ablation or Lariat procedure using the LBN or MPN. Oral anticoagulation was stopped before the procedure. Baseline characteristics and procedure-related complications were collected and compared. Of the 404 patients, LBN and MPN were used in 46% and 54% of patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of inadvertent puncture of myocardium between LBN and MPN (7.6% versus 6.8%, P=0.76). However, there was a significantly higher rate of large pericardial effusions with LBN compared with MPN (8.1% versus 0.9%; P<0.001). The incidence of pleural effusions were not significantly different between both (1.6% versus 2.3%; P=0.64). LBN group had an increase in other complications compared with MPN (open heart surgery to repair cardiac laceration [6 versus 0], injury to liver [1 versus 0], coronaries [1 versus 0], and superior epigastric artery requiring surgical exploration [0 versus 1])., Conclusions: The use of MPN is associated with decreased incidence of major complications, and the need for surgical repair and routine use should be considered for EA., (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Introduction: Limited data is available regarding the novel Reveal LinQ (LinQ) which is a new generation implantable loop recorders (ILRs)., Methods: We performed a prospective, observational study of all consecutive patients undergoing conventional (Reveal XT; XT) and LinQ devices at our institution between January 2012 and December 2014., Results: A total of 217 patients underwent ILR implantation. XT was implanted in 105 and LinQ in 112 patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. LinQ implantation using the manufacturer's technique termed, "manufacturer's method" group had significantly higher incidence of pocket infection compared to XT (6/50, 12% vs 3/105, 3%, p=0.032). With modifications to the LinQ implantation technique (using a conventional scalpel and placing a suture when needed to the incision) termed "modified method" group, the rate of infection has decreased significantly compared to "manufacturer's method group" (0/62, 0% vs 6/50, 12%, p=0.004) (Table 3). In multivariate regression analysis, the only independent predictors of infection were younger age (OR 0.95; p=0.04), insertion of LinQ device (OR 30.02; p=0.006) and procedure time (OR 1.07; p=0.03)., Conclusion: In our single-center, prospective, observational study we found that with the current implantable techniques, the novel insertable LinQ device is associated with increased risk of complications., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a well-known source of atrial arrhythmia and atrial fibrillation (AF)., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether LAA exclusion using the LARIAT device would decrease AF burden., Methods: A total of 50 patients with AF and cardiac implantable electronic devices who underwent successful LAA exclusion were enrolled in this prospective observational study. AF burden before LAA exclusion (baseline) and 3 and 12 months after exclusion was assessed by device interrogation., Results: AF burden at 3-month follow-up (42% ± 34%) was significantly lower compared to baseline (76% ± 33%, P < .0001). The reduction in AF burden was sustained at 12 months (59% ± 26%, P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that AF burden at 3-month follow-up was similarly reduced in both paroxysmal AF (n = 19) and nonparoxysmal AF (n = 31). However, there was no reduction in AF burden in patients with paroxysmal AF at 12 months. AF burden in patients with known AF triggers in the LAA (n = 9) was significantly reduced at 3 months (52% ± 35%) and 12 months (42% ± 19%) compared to respective baseline (84 ± 31%, P < .0001)., Conclusion: LAA exclusion appears to reduce AF burden. The presence of AF triggers in the LAA appears to be the strongest predictor of AF reduction. The study underscores the role of the LAA in arrhythmogenesis for AF and highlights the complementary role of LAA exclusion in restoration of normal sinus rhythm., (Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)