Search

Your search keyword '"Dheansa, Baljit"' showing total 359 results
Start Over Author "Dheansa, Baljit"
359 results on '"Dheansa, Baljit"'

17. Best practice for wound repair and regeneration use of cellular, acellular and matrix-like products (CAMPs)

Author

Wu, Stephanie, primary, Carter, Marissa, additional, Cole, Windy, additional, Crombie, Roselle, additional, Kapp, Daniel L., additional, Kim, Paul, additional, Milne, Catherine, additional, Molnar, Joseph, additional, Niezgoda, Jeffrey, additional, Woo, Kevin, additional, Zabel, David, additional, Hamm, Rose, additional, Armstrong, David, additional, Bock, Alan J, additional, Dheansa, Baljit, additional, Driver, Vickie, additional, Glat, Paul, additional, Lantis, John, additional, Ferreira, Lydia Masako, additional, Melin, Mark, additional, Patel, Keyur, additional, Ricci, Elia, additional, Simman, Richard, additional, Steinberg, John, additional, Tettelbach, William, additional, and Weir, Dot, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

23. The medical selfie

Author

Ray, Arunava, Scott, Annabel Diane, Nikkhah, Dariush, and Dheansa, Baljit S

Published
2015

26. The impact of pre-existing venous pathology on lower limb free flap reconstruction and the role of preoperative screening: a systematic review.

Author

Hagiga, Ahmed, Adeboye, Teniola, and Dheansa, Baljit

Subjects
FREE flaps, MEDICAL screening, PATHOLOGY, HYPEREMIA, VENOUS thrombosis
Abstract

Lower limb reconstruction is performed to replace like with like and achieve tissue durability. Free flaps are a method of reconstruction commonly used to manage cases of lower limb deficits. However, the failure rate is 8.5%, with venous thrombosis and congestion playing a significant role. Despite this, preoperative venous mapping of recipient site before free flap reconstruction is not routinely practiced, often resulting in pathologies remaining unidentified until the intraoperative stage. The aim of the review was to evaluate the existing literature on the topic of lower limb preoperative venous assessment, screening, and its effect on lower limb free flap survival. Five different databases were searched from their inception to August 2021. The search terms and included studies were independently reviewed by two investigators for their eligibility. Eleven articles were eligible for inclusion, with a combined patient population of 99, and 107 flaps were identified to have lower limb pathology at the donor or recipient vein. Venous pathology was detected preoperatively in 69 veins using ultrasound duplex scanning and computed tomography angiography; of them, 3 (4.34%) resulted in failure. In comparison, 38 veins were diagnosed with venous pathology intraoperatively; of them, 5 (13.85%) failed. The studies evaluated in this review demonstrated that preoperative screening for venous pathology showed a higher flap survival rate. It can therefore be inferred that developing a standardized preoperative process for identifying venous issues in lower limb free flap reconstruction may improve outcomes. This can be explored in future research, with a focus on assessing the validity and efficacy of such screening tools, and their role in the management of patients identified with venous pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

28. Establishment of a core outcome set for burn care research: development and international consensus

Author

Young, Amber, primary, Davies, Anna, additional, Tsang, Carmen, additional, Kirkham, Jamie, additional, Potokar, Tom, additional, Gibran, Nicole, additional, Tyack, Zephanie, additional, Meirte, Jill, additional, Harada, Teruichi, additional, Dheansa, Baljit, additional, Dumville, Jo, additional, Metcalfe, Chris, additional, Ahuja, Rajeev, additional, Wood, Fiona, additional, Gaskell, Sarah, additional, Brookes, Sara, additional, Smailes, Sarah, additional, Jeschke, Marc, additional, Cinar, Murat Ali, additional, Zia, Nukhba, additional, Moghazy, Amr, additional, Mathers, Jonathan, additional, Falder, Sian, additional, Edgar, Dale, additional, and Blazeby, Jane Mary, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

33. Managing frostbite

Author

Hallam, Marc-James, Cubison, Tania, Dheansa, Baljit, and Imray, Chris

Published
2010

44. Eschar removal by bromelain based enzymatic debridement (Nexobrid®) in burns: European consensus guidelines update

Author

Hirche, Christoph, Kreken Almeland, Stian, Dheansa, Baljit, Fuchs, Paul, Governa, Maurizio, Hoeksema, Henk, Korzeniowski, Tomasz, Lumenta, David B, Marinescu, Silviu, Martinez-Mendez, José Ramón, Plock, Jan A, Sander, Frank, Ziegler, Benjamin, Kneser, Ulrich, Hirche, Christoph, Kreken Almeland, Stian, Dheansa, Baljit, Fuchs, Paul, Governa, Maurizio, Hoeksema, Henk, Korzeniowski, Tomasz, Lumenta, David B, Marinescu, Silviu, Martinez-Mendez, José Ramón, Plock, Jan A, Sander, Frank, Ziegler, Benjamin, and Kneser, Ulrich

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Bromelain-based Enzymatic Debridement has been introduced as an additional concept to the burn surgeon's armamentarium and is best indicated for mid-to deep dermal burns with mixed patterns. Increasing evidence has been published focusing on special regions and settings as well as on limitations of Enzymatic Debridement to improve patient care. To better guide Enzymatic Debridement in view of the increasing experience, there is a need to update the formerly published consensus guidelines with user-orientated recommendations, which were last produced in 2017. METHODS A multi-professional expert panel of plastic surgeons and burn care specialists from twelve European centers was convened, to assist in developing current recommendations for best practices with use of Enzymatic Debridement. Consensus statements were based on peer-reviewed publications and clinical relevance, and topics for re-evaluation and refinement were derived from the formerly published European guidelines. For consensus agreement, the methodology employed was an agreement algorithm based on a modification of the Willy and Stellar method. For this study on Enzymatic Debridement, consensus was considered when there was at least 80 % agreement to each statement. RESULTS The updated consensus guidelines from 2019 refer to the clinical experience and practice patterns of 1232 summarized patient cases treated by the panelists with ED in Europe (2017: 500 cases), reflecting the impact of the published recommendations. Forty-three statements were formulated, addressing the following topics: indications, pain management and anesthesia, large surface treatment, timing of application for various indications, preparation and application, post-interventional wound management, skin grafting, outcome, scar and revision management, cost-effectiveness, patient´s perspective, logistic aspects and training strategies. The degree of consensus was remarkably high, with consensus in 42 out of 43 statements

Published
2020

46. Eschar removal by bromelain based enzymatic debridement (Nexobrid®) in burns: European consensus guidelines update

Author

Hirche, Christoph, primary, Kreken Almeland, Stian, additional, Dheansa, Baljit, additional, Fuchs, Paul, additional, Governa, Maurizio, additional, Hoeksema, Henk, additional, Korzeniowski, Tomasz, additional, Lumenta, David B., additional, Marinescu, Silviu, additional, Martinez-Mendez, José Ramón, additional, Plock, Jan A., additional, Sander, Frank, additional, Ziegler, Benjamin, additional, and Kneser, Ulrich, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

50. Managing frostbite

Author

Hallam, Mark-James, Cubison, Tania, Dheansa, Baljit, and Imray, Chris

Subjects
Frostbite -- Causes of, Frostbite -- Diagnosis, Frostbite -- Care and treatment
Published
2010

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results