Search

Backgorund. The human microbiome, consisting of diverse bacterial, fungal, protozoan and viral species, exerts a profound influence on various physiological processes and disease susceptibility. However, the complexity of microbiome data has presented significant challenges in the analysis and interpretation of these intricate datasets, leading to the development of specialized software that employs machine learning algorithms for these aims. Methods. In this paper, we analyze raw data taken from 16S rRNA gene sequencing from three studies, including stool samples from healthy control, patients with adenoma, and patients with colorectal cancer. Firstly, we use network-based methods to reduce dimensions of the dataset and consider only the most important features. In addition, we employ supervised machine learning algorithms to make prediction. Results. Results show that graph-based techniques reduces dimension from 255 up to 78 features with modularity score 0.73 based on different centrality measures. On the other hand, projection methods (non-negative matrix factorization and principal component analysis) reduce dimensions to 7 features. Furthermore, we apply supervised machine learning algorithms on the most important features obtained from centrality measures and on the ones obtained from projection methods, founding that the evaluation metrics have approximately the same scores when applying the algorithms on the entire dataset, on 78 feature and on 7 features. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the efficacy of graph-based and projection methods in the interpretation for 16S rRNA gene sequencing data. Supervised machine learning on refined features from both approaches yields comparable predictive performance, emphasizing specific microbial features-bacteroides, prevotella, fusobacterium, lysinibacillus, blautia, sphingomonas, and faecalibacterium-as key in predicting patient conditions from raw data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction to the article "MiR-1294 acts as a tumor suppressor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma through targeting HOXA6", by W. Pan, L.-J. Pang, H.-L. Cai, Y. Wu, W. Zhang, J.-C. Fang, published in Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci has been retracted by the Editor in Chief.

Background: The human microbiome, consisting of diverse bacte-rial, fungal, protozoan and viral species, exerts a profound influence on various physiological processes and disease susceptibility. However, the complexity of microbiome data has presented significant challenges in the analysis and interpretation of these intricate datasets, leading to the development of specialized software that employs machine learning algorithms for these aims., Methods: In this paper, we analyze raw data taken from 16S rRNA gene sequencing from three studies, including stool samples from healthy control, patients with adenoma, and patients with colorectal cancer. Firstly, we use network-based methods to reduce dimensions of the dataset and consider only the most important features. In addition, we employ supervised machine learning algorithms to make prediction., Results: Results show that graph-based techniques reduces dimen-sion from 255 up to 78 features with modularity score 0.73 based on different centrality measures. On the other hand, projection methods (non-negative matrix factorization and principal component analysis) reduce dimensions to 7 features. Furthermore, we apply supervised machine learning algorithms on the most important features obtained from centrality measures and on the ones obtained from projection methods, founding that the evaluation metrics have approximately the same scores when applying the algorithms on the entire dataset, on 78 feature and on 7 features., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the efficacy of graph-based and projection methods in the interpretation for 16S rRNA gene sequencing data. Supervised machine learning on refined features from both approaches yields comparable predictive performance, emphasizing specific microbial features-bacteroides, prevotella, fusobacterium, lysinibacillus, blautia, sphingomonas, and faecalibacterium-as key in predicting patient conditions from raw data.

Objective: Given its effects on long-term illnesses, like heart problems and diabetes, air pollution may be among the reasons that led COVID-19 to get worse and kill a larger number of people. Experiments have shown that breathing in polluted air weakens the immune system, making it easier for viruses to enter the body and grow. Viruses may be able to survive in the air by interacting in complex ways with particles and gases. These interactions depend on the air's chemical makeup, the particles' electric charges, and environmental conditions like humidity, UV light, and temperature. Moreover, exposure to UV rays and air pollution may reduce the organism's production of antimicrobial molecules, thus supporting viral infections. More epidemiological studies are needed to determine what effects air pollution has on COVID-19. In this review, we will discuss how air pollutants such as PM2.5 and PM10 contribute to the transmission of COVID-19., Materials and Methods: We have used nine target cities in the Tuscany region to verify this certainty, and in all these cases, the air pollution factors were found to be strongly correlated with COVID-19 cases. For each city, we applied a multivariate analysis and found an appropriate model that better fits the data., Results: This review underlines that both short-term and long-term exposure to air pollution may be crucial exasperating factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission and COVID-19 severity and lethality. The statistical analysis concludes that air pollution should be accounted for as a possible risk factor in future COVID-19 investigations, and it should be avoided as much as possible by the general population., Conclusions: Our research highlighted the correlation between COVID-19 and air pollution. Reducing air pollution exposure should be one of the first measures against COVID-19 spread.

The human microbiome has become an area of intense research due to its potential impact on human health. However, the analysis and interpretation of this data have proven to be challenging due to its complexity and high dimensionality. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can process vast amounts of data to uncover informative patterns and relationships within the data, even with limited prior knowledge. Therefore, there has been a rapid growth in the development of software specifically designed for the analysis and interpretation of microbiome data using ML techniques. These software incorporate a wide range of ML algorithms for clustering, classification, regression, or feature selection, to identify microbial patterns and relationships within the data and generate predictive models. This rapid development with a constant need for new developments and integration of new features require efforts into compile, catalog and classify these tools to create infrastructures and services with easy, transparent, and trustable standards. Here we review the state-of-the-art for ML tools applied in human microbiome studies, performed as part of the COST Action ML4Microbiome activities. This scoping review focuses on ML based software and framework resources currently available for the analysis of microbiome data in humans. The aim is to support microbiologists and biomedical scientists to go deeper into specialized resources that integrate ML techniques and facilitate future benchmarking to create standards for the analysis of microbiome data. The software resources are organized based on the type of analysis they were developed for and the ML techniques they implement. A description of each software with examples of usage is provided including comments about pitfalls and lacks in the usage of software based on ML methods in relation to microbiome data that need to be considered by developers and users. This review represents an extensive compilation to date, offering valuable insights and guidance for researchers interested in leveraging ML approaches for microbiome analysis., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Marcos-Zambrano, López-Molina, Bakir-Gungor, Frohme, Karaduzovic-Hadziabdic, Klammsteiner, Ibrahimi, Lahti, Loncar Turukalo, Dhamo, Simeon, Nechyporenko, Pio, Przymus, Sampri, Trajkovik, Lacruz-Pleguezuelos, Aasmets, Araujo, Anagnostopoulos, Aydemir, Berland, Calle, Ceci, Duman, Gündoğdu, Havulinna, Kaka Bra, Kalluci, Karav, Lode, Lopes, May, Nap, Nedyalkova, Paciência, Pasic, Pujolassos, Shigdel, Susín, Thiele, Truică, Wilmes, Yilmaz, Yousef, Claesson, Truu, Carrillo de Santa Pau.)

Although metagenomic sequencing is now the preferred technique to study microbiome-host interactions, analyzing and interpreting microbiome sequencing data presents challenges primarily attributed to the statistical specificities of the data (e.g., sparse, over-dispersed, compositional, inter-variable dependency). This mini review explores preprocessing and transformation methods applied in recent human microbiome studies to address microbiome data analysis challenges. Our results indicate a limited adoption of transformation methods targeting the statistical characteristics of microbiome sequencing data. Instead, there is a prevalent usage of relative and normalization-based transformations that do not specifically account for the specific attributes of microbiome data. The information on preprocessing and transformations applied to the data before analysis was incomplete or missing in many publications, leading to reproducibility concerns, comparability issues, and questionable results. We hope this mini review will provide researchers and newcomers to the field of human microbiome research with an up-to-date point of reference for various data transformation tools and assist them in choosing the most suitable transformation method based on their research questions, objectives, and data characteristics., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Ibrahimi, Lopes, Dhamo, Simeon, Shigdel, Hron, Stres, D’Elia, Berland and Marcos-Zambrano.)