Search

HER2 signaling network and its complex relationship with the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway explain the acquired resistance to anti-HER2 therapy observed in clinics. Such complexity has been clinically evident from the limited efficacy of data in the BOLERO-1 and BOLERO-3 trials, which tested combinations of trastuzumab (T), everolimus, and chemotherapy in women with HER2+ advanced BC. In the following MARIANNE trial also, a combination of T-DM1 plus pertuzumab delivered a non-inferior but yet not superior PFS compared to trastuzumab plus a taxane. Algorithmic inhibition of PI3K/mTOR along with T or T-DM1 is, therefore, an attractive drug combination, and we tested the combination(s) in HER2+ BC, especially in T-resistant and PIK3CA mutated conditions. GDC-0980, a dual pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor alone or in combination with T or T-DM1, was examined in a panel of HER2+ T-sensitive (BT474, SKBR3), HER2+ T-resistant (BT474HerR), HER2+/PIK3CA mutant (HCC1954, MDA-MB453), and HER2+/PTEN mutant (HCC1569) BC cell lines. GDC-0980 re-sensitized trastuzumab-resistant, PIK3CA mutant, or PTEN mutant cells to T and acted additively with T. Importantly, this activity was more when GDC-0980 is combined with T-DM1. The combination (with T or with T-DM1) was then tested in the HER2+/T-sensitive, HER2+/T-resistant, and HER2+/PIK3CA mutated BC xenograft models for the anti-tumor effect. Along with its anti-tumor effect, GDC-0980 effectively decreased tumor angiogenesis (CD31 staining). Maximum anti-tumor (from tumor growth inhibition to tumor regression) efficiency was observed in all three xenograft models when T-DM1 was combined with GDC-0980. The anti-proliferative effects of GDC-0980 as evidenced by a decreased p-AKT (Ser473, The308), p-P70S6K, p-S6RP, and p-4EBP1, along with blockade of clonogenic 3D growth was accompanied by the initiation of apoptotic activity (annexin V, CASPASE3, cleaved PARP1 and mitochondrial depolarization); and was significantly superior when GDC-0980 combined with T-DM1. Interestingly, both trastuzumab and T-DM1 induce PD-L1 expression in HER2 amplified BC cells. Our data provide evidence that an oncogenic mutation of PIK3CA and HER2-amplification may represent biomarkers to identify patients who may benefit most from the use of GDC-0980 and an opportunity to include immunotherapy in the combination of anti-HER2 therapy.

The importance and role of the estrogen receptor (ER) pathway have been well-recognized in both breast cancer development and progression. The treatment of choice in women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (ER+ mBC) is classically divided into a variety of endocrine therapies, with three of the most common being: selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM), aromatase inhibitors (AI), and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERD). However, resistance develops in 30-50% of patients treated with these endocrine therapies due to a sophisticated and at times redundant interference at the molecular level between the ER, growth factors, and downstream cell-signaling pathways. Tumor response is heightened with adjunctive therapy that includes an mTORC1 inhibitor (everolimus), CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib/ribociclib/abemaciclib), and an α isoform-specific PI3K inhibitor (alpelisib). Each of these inhibitors elicits potent anti-proliferative benefits; however, they fail to induce tumor cell death. Consequently, disease progression almost invariably occurs. Evasion of apoptosis is a hallmark of cancer. The p53 and BCL2 represent two important nodes of the apoptosis signaling pathway. Venetoclax, a potent and selective BCL2 inhibitor, synergizes with hormonal therapy in ER+ breast cancer models and is active in clinical trials. Similarly, an MDM2 inhibitor, AMG-232, which induces p53 is active in early clinical trials of both liquid and advanced solid tumor patients. In our ER+ BC cohort (Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD), we observed more than 70% of wild type TP53 and over 10% amplification of MDM2 and MDM4 as comparable with the TCGA data set. We summarized current treatment options, the molecular mechanisms that predispose to endocrine resistance, and a future pro-apoptotic treatment strategy for ER+ mBC patients. Our review presents critical analyses of the therapeutic options for the clinical management of ER+ Metastatic Breast Cancer in the light of a hypothesis targeting the induction of apoptosis in p53 wild type tumors. We reviewed not only the FDA approved current treatment approaches but also presented a discourse addressing the possibilities for novel combination strategy that can induce tumor cell apoptosis, a critical cellular mechanism delaying/denying tumor progression. Our review is unique as it presents patient data in support of our hypothesis.

A tumor cell carrying characteristic genomic alteration(s) exists within its host’s microenvironment. The tumor microenvironment (TME) renders holistic support to the tumor via cross-talk between tumor cells and three components of TME, immune components, vascular components, and fibroblast components. The tempero-spatial interaction of tumor cells with its microenvironment is the deterministic factor for tumor growth, progression, resistance to therapy, and its outcome in clinics. TME (1) facilitates proliferation, and the ensuing metastasis-associated phenotypes, (2) perturbs immune surveillance and supports tumor cells in their effort to evade immune recognition, and (3) actively participates in developing drug-induced resistance in cancer cells. Cancer-Associated Fibroblast (CAF) is a unique component of TME. CAF is the host mesenchyme immediately surrounding the tumor cells in solid tumors. It facilitates tumor growth and progression and participates in developing drug resistance in tumor cells by playing a critical role in all the ways mentioned above. The clinical outcome of a disease is thus critically contributed to by the CAF component of TME. Although CAFs have been identified historically, the functional relevance of CAF-tumor cell cross-talk and their influence on angiogenic and immune-components of TME are yet to be characterized in solid tumors, especially in endometrial cancers. Currently, the standard of care for the treatment of endometrial cancers is primarily guided by therapies directed towards the disease’s tumor compartment and immune compartments. Unfortunately, in the current state of therapies, a complete response (CR) to the therapy is still limited despite a more commonly achieved partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) in patients. Acknowledging the limitations of the current sets of therapies based on only the tumor and immune compartments of the disease, we sought to put forward this review based on the importance of the cross-talk between CAF of the tumor microenvironment and tumor cells. The premise of the review is to recognize the critical role of CAF in disease progression. This manuscript presents a systemic review of the role of CAF in endometrial cancers. We critically interrogated the active involvement of CAF in the tumor compartment of endometrial cancers. Here we present the functional characteristics of CAF in the context of endometrial cancers. We review (1) the characteristics of CAF, (2) their evolution from being anti-tumor to pro-tumor, (3) their involvement in regulating growth and several metastasis-associated phenotypes of tumor cells, (4) their participation in perturbing immune defense and evading immune surveillance, and (5) their role in mediating drug resistance via tumor-CAF cross-talk with particular reference to endometrial cancers. We interrogate the functional characteristics of CAF in the light of its dialogue with tumor cells and other components of TME towards developing a CAF-based strategy for precision therapy to supplement tumor-based therapy. The purpose of the review is to present a new vision and initiate a thought process which recognizes the importance of CAF in a tumor, thereby resulting in a novel approach to the design and management of the disease in endometrial cancers.