Search

In this study, using Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) personnel data from 2006 to 2014, we identified seven states with consistently low shortages of highly qualified special education teachers and seven states with persistently high shortages. We employed Guarino et al.'s framework to guide our assumptions and selection of demographic, supply, and demand variables and compared two groups in this descriptive analysis. We found significant differences across supply and demand variables. Low shortage states make greater investments in per pupil expenditures; have higher teacher salaries, generally; have greater preparation capacity; and produce more special education graduates. Taken together, our findings suggest that special education teaching is a relatively better job in low shortage states than in high shortage states. We situate the discussion of our findings within policy recommendations that states may use to address shortages. Limitations of our analysis are addressed, and implications for future research are proposed.

Demand for special education teachers grew continuously from the passage of Public Law 94-142 in 1975 through 2005, when this trend reversed. From 2005 to 2012, the number of special education teachers employed by U.S. schools declined by >17%. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine factors that contributed to this decline. We parsed change in number of special education teachers employed into four constituent elements and found that these recent reductions were fueled by decreases in disability prevalence and the relative ratio of teachers to students in special versus general education, which favored the latter. These changes have important implications for teacher preparation programs' efforts to adequately prepare special and general educators and for policies designed to improve teacher quality.

This article describes what the author, a faculty member, learned from the student development professionals at his university, the people who plan student activities and run residence halls. Most faculty think little of their student development colleagues, to the extent that they consider them colleagues at all. The author describes how he learned to stop blaming students with their help.

Monte Carlo techniques are used to study the steady state and transient drift velocity of holes in silicon. The warped nonparabolic heavy and light hole bands and a spherical spin-orbit band, modelled the valance band. Piecewise continuous functions are used in the inclusion of the non-parabolicity of the heavy and light hold bands. The Monte Carlo calculations which involve only the heavy hole band yielded results which were not accurate, when compared to the theoretically obtained velocities.

What one faculty member learned from student development professionals [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]