1. Why use group visits for opioid use disorder treatment in primary care? A patient-centered qualitative study
- Author
-
Jessica Early, Randi Sokol, Deviney Chaponis, Fran Puopolo, Chiara Albanese, George Maxted, Zev Schuman-Olivier, Grace Poirier, and Diana Morrill
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,030508 substance abuse ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Primary care ,03 medical and health sciences ,Appointments and Schedules ,0302 clinical medicine ,Naloxone ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Qualitative Research ,Primary Health Care ,business.industry ,Opioid use disorder ,Focus Groups ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Opioid-Related Disorders ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Self-Help Groups ,Opioid ,Emergency medicine ,Female ,Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Patient centered ,Buprenorphine ,medicine.drug ,Qualitative research - Abstract
Background Primary care providers are well positioned to respond to the opioid crisis by providing buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) through shared medical appointments (SMAs). Although quantitative research has been previously conducted on SMAs with B/N, the authors conducted a qualitative assessment from the patients’ point of view, considering whether and how group visits provide value for patients. Methods Twenty-five participants with opioid use disorder (OUD) who were enrolled in a weekly B/N group visit at a family medicine clinic participated in either of two 1-hour-long focus groups, which were conducted as actual group visits. Participants were prompted with the question “How has this group changed you as a person?” Data were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed and analyzed using a qualitative thematic approach, identifying common communication behaviors and resulting attitudes about the value of the group visit model. Results Participants demonstrated several communication behaviors that support group members in their recovery, including offering direct emotional support to others struggling with difficult experiences, making an intentional effort to probe about others’ lives, venting about heavy situations, joking to lighten the mood, and expressing feelings of gratitude to the entire group. These communication behaviors appear to act as mechanisms to foster a sense of accountability, a shared identity, and a supportive community. Other demonstrated group behaviors may detract from the value of the group experience, including side conversations, tangential comments, and individual participants disproportionately dominating group time. Conclusion The group visit format for delivering B/N promotes group-specific communication behaviors that may add unique value in supporting patients in their recovery. Future research should elucidate whether these benefits can be isolated from those achieved solely through medication treatment with B/N and if similar benefits could be achieved in non–primary care sites.
- Published
- 2017