Search

Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT2) represents a rescue option for selected patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Still, relapse rates post-allo-SCT2 remain high and effective anti-relapse strategies and predictive biomarkers remain to be defined. We here analyzed a cohort of 41 AML patients (pts) undergoing allo-SCT2 in our center. Allo-SCT2 induced a third hematologic complete remission (CR) in 37 pts, at costs of a 36% non-relapse mortality rate. Furthermore, 19 pts eventually relapsed post allo-SCT2. Addressing relapse after allo-SCT2, 14 pts (74%) underwent cell-based anti-relapse strategies, including third allogeneic transplantation (allo-SCT3; 3/14), donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) combined with either 5-azacytidin and venetoclax (4/14) or chemotherapeutic agents (7/14). Notably, six of seven pts (86%) who received either allo-SCT3 or a combination therapy of DLIs, 5-azacytidine and venetoclax achieved CR despite poor cytogenetics post-allo-SCT2 (e.g., TP53). Finally, 11 of 41 pts were alive at the last follow-up (seven CR2, three CR3, one partial remission) resulting in estimated 2- and 5-year overall survival of 35% and 25%, respectively.

PURPOSE In contrast to 5-azacytidine (5-aza), allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a curative treatment strategy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but therapy-related mortality (TRM) limits its broader use in elderly patients with MDS. The present prospective multicenter study compared HSCT following 5-aza pretreatment with continuous 5-aza treatment in patients with higher-risk MDS age 55-70 years. METHODS One hundred ninety patients with a median age of 63 years were enrolled. Patients received 4-6 cycles of 5-aza followed by HLA-compatible HSCT after reduced-intensity conditioning or by continuous 5-aza if no donor was identified. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients did not fulfill inclusion criteria (n = 20), died (n = 2) withdrew informed consent (n = 5), or were excluded for an unknown reason (n = 1). 5-aza induction started in 162 patients, but only 108 (67%) were eligible for subsequent allocation to HSCT (n = 81) or continuation of 5-aza (n = 27) because of disease progression (n = 26), death (n = 12), or other reasons (n = 16). Seven percent died during 5-aza before treatment allocation. The cumulative incidence of TRM after HSCT at 1 year was 19%. The event-free survival and overall survival after 5-aza pretreatment and treatment allocation at 3 years were 34% (95% CI, 22 to 47) and 50% (95% CI, 39 to 61) after allograft and 0% and 32% (95% CI, 14 to 52) after continuous 5-aza treatment ( P < .0001 and P = .12), respectively. Fourteen patients progressing after continuous 5-aza received a salvage allograft from an alternative donor, and 43% were alive at last follow-up. CONCLUSION In older patients with MDS, reduced-intensity conditioning HSCT resulted in a significantly improved event-free survival in comparison with continuous 5-aza therapy. Bridging with 5-aza to HSCT before is associated with a considerable rate of dropouts because of progression, mortality, and adverse events.

Despite a detailed understanding of the genes mutated in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), diagnostic and treatment decisions for patients with MDS rely primarily on clinical and cytogenetic variables as considered by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). Here we describe the recently developed Molecular IPSS (IPSS-M), a clinico-genomic risk stratification system that considers clinical, cytogenetic and genetic parameters; the implementation of a web portal to facilitate its adoption, a strategy to handle missing variables, and the worldwide utilization of the web calculator as a clinical support tool. The IPSS-M was trained on 2,957 clinically annotated diagnostic MDS samples profiled for mutations in 156 driver genes. To maximize the clinical applicability of the IPSS-M and account for missing genetic data (i.e genes missing from a sequencing panel), we implemented a strategy to calculate a risk score under three scenarios: best, worst and average. Last, we developed an online calculator as a standalone single-page web application using VueJs, and D3Js for the interactive visualizations, deployed through a CI/CD pipeline on AWS, where collection of anonymous usage analytics allows to track adoption and usability of the new proposed model. The model incorporates clinical, morphological, genetic variables informed by cytogenetics and constructed from the presence of oncogenic mutations in 31 genes. It delivers a unique risk score for each individual patient, as well as an assignment to one of six IPSS-M risk strata. Compared to the IPSS-R the IPSS-M re-stratified 46% of MDS patients. The model was validated in an external dataset of 754 MDS patients. We released an open-access IPSS-M web calculator available at https://mds-risk-model.com. By specifying the patient clinical and molecular profiles, the tool returns the patient-specific IPSS-M risk score and category, and the probability estimates over time for three clinical endpoints, i.e. leukemia free survival (LFS), overall survival, and incidence of leukemic transformation. Since its launch in June 2022, the calculator has been used by >6000 users in >75 countries, reaching a daily average of 100 users per day. Risks have been calculated for >45,000 patient profiles. 99.28% of the sessions initiated reach an IPSS-M score, suggesting that the calculator is intuitive and easy to use. We trained and validated the IPSS-M on 3,711 patients, a patient tailored risk stratification tool for patients with MDS that considers clinical, morphological and genetic variables inclusive of cytogenetics and mutations in one of 31 genes. The development of a web based tool was instrumental to the global dissemination of the model, enabling non-expert users to leverage the power of molecular biomarkers in risk stratification for patients with MDS. Citation Format: Elsa Bernard, Juan E. Arango Ossa, Heinz Tuechler, Peter L. Greenberg, Robert P. Hasserjian, Yasuhito Nannya, Sean M. Devlin, Maria Creignou, Philippe Pinel, Lily Monier, Juan S. Medina-Martinez, Dylan Domenico, Martin Jädersten, Ulrich Germing, Guillermo Sanz, Arjan A. van de Loosdrecht, Olivier Kosmider, Matilde Y. Follo, Felicitas Thol, Lurdes Zamora, Ronald F. Pinheiro, Andrea Pellagatti, Detlef Haase, Pierre Fenaux, Monika Belickova, Michael R. Savona, Virginia M. Klimek, Fabio P. Santos, Jacqueline Boultwood, Ioannis Kotsianidis, Valeria Santini, Francesc Solé, Uwe Platzbecker, Michael Heuser, Peter Valent, Kazuma Ohyashiki, Carlo Finelli, Maria Teresa Voso, Lee-Yung Shih, Michaela Fontenay, Joop H. Jansen, José Cervera, Norbert Gattermann, Benjamin L. Ebert, Rafael Bejar, Luca Malcovati, Mario Cazzola, Seishi Ogawa, Eva Hellström-Lindberg, Elli Papaemmanuil. Implementation and adoption of a web tool to support precision diagnostic and treatment decisions for patient with myelodysplastic syndromes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6168.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with isolated deletion of chromosome 5q (MDS del5q) is a distinct subtype of MDS with quite favorable prognosis and excellent response to treatment with lenalidomide. Still, a relevant percentage of patients do not respond to lenalidomide and even experience progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether global DNA methylation patterns could predict response to lenalidomide. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis using Illumina 450k methylation arrays was performed on n=51 patients with MDS del5q who were uniformly treated with lenalidomide in a prospective multicenter trial of the German MDS study group. To study potential direct effects of lenalidomide on DNA methylation, 17 paired samples pre- and post-treatment were analyzed. Our results revealed no relevant effect of lenalidomide on methylation status. Furthermore, methylation patterns prior to therapy could not predict lenalidomide response. However, methylation clustering identified a group of patients with a trend towards inferior overall survival. These patients showed hypermethylation of several interesting target genes, including genes of relevant signaling pathways, potentially indicating the evaluation of novel therapeutic targets. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00277-021-04492-1.

In this single center retrospective analysis 76 patients with high-risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) treated with azacitidine (AZA) were reviewed for response, especially cytogenetic response (cyR) using repeated chromosome banding analyses (CBA) of bone marrow (bm) metaphases and frequent sequential Fluorescence-in-situ Hybridization (FISH) analyses of immunomagnetically enriched CD34 + circulating peripheral blood cells (CD34 +pb-FISH). In total, 526 CD34 +pb-FISH analyses and 236 CBA were examined. Median observation time was 8.45 months, median number of AZA cycles applied was 8, median overall survival (OS) was 14.9 months, 42.1 % of patients responded to therapy according to IWG criteria: 5 complete response (CR), 0 partial response (PR), 12 bmCR, 15 stable disease with hematologic improvement (HI). HI was reached in 36.8 % of patients, 31.5 % became transfusion-independent. By CBA or CD34 +pb-FISH 20.4 % and 31.6 % of patients showed cyR, respectively. HI rate was significantly higher in cytogenetic responders than in non-responders, but there was no impact on OS or leukemia-free-survival. Cytogenetic responders showed significantly better OS than non-responders. Patients with ≥ 6 AZA cycles had significantly better OS than patients with 6 cycles applied. Karyotype evolution (KE) as a manifestation of cytogenetic progression was diagnosed in 29.5 % and 17.1 % of patients by CBA and CD34 +pb-FISH, respectively. KE was associated with significantly poorer OS and leukemia-free-survival.

The tumor suppressor p53 exerts pivotal roles in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) homeostasis. Mutations of the TP53 gene have recently been described in individuals with clonal hematopoiesis conferring substantial risk of developing blood cancers. In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), TP53 aberrations—mutations, deletions, and a combination thereof—are encountered at a constant frequency of approximately 10%. These aberrations affect HSCs transforming them into preleukemic stem cells, pinpointing their central role in leukemogenesis. AML and MDS with TP53 aberrations are characterized by complex chromosomal aberrations. Respective patients experience a dismal long-term outcome following treatment with both intensive and nonintensive regimens including novel agents like venetoclax combinations or even allogeneic HSC transplantation. However, according to the 2016 WHO classification, AML and MDS with TP53 aberrations are still regarded as separate disease entities. On the basis of their common biological and clinical features, we propose to classify AML and MDS with TP53 aberrations as a single, distinct stem cell disorder with a unique genetic make-up, comparable with the WHO classification of “AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities.” This approach will have implications for basic and translational research endeavors, aid in harmonization of current treatment strategies, and facilitate the development of master trials targeting a common deleterious driver event.

Tumor protein p53 (TP53) is the most frequently mutated gene in cancer1,2. In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), TP53 mutations are associated with high-risk disease3,4, rapid transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML)5, resistance to conventional therapies6–8 and dismal outcomes9. Consistent with the tumor-suppressive role of TP53, patients harbor both mono- and biallelic mutations10. However, the biological and clinical implications of TP53 allelic state have not been fully investigated in MDS or any other cancer type. We analyzed 3,324 patients with MDS for TP53 mutations and allelic imbalances and delineated two subsets of patients with distinct phenotypes and outcomes. One-third of TP53-mutated patients had monoallelic mutations whereas two-thirds had multiple hits (multi-hit) consistent with biallelic targeting. Established associations with complex karyotype, few co-occurring mutations, high-risk presentation and poor outcomes were specific to multi-hit patients only. TP53 multi-hit state predicted risk of death and leukemic transformation independently of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R)11. Surprisingly, monoallelic patients did not differ from TP53 wild-type patients in outcomes and response to therapy. This study shows that consideration of TP53 allelic state is critical for diagnostic and prognostic precision in MDS as well as in future correlative studies of treatment response. Clinical sequencing across a large prospective cohort of patients with myelodysplasic syndrome uncovers distinct associations between the mono- and biallelic states of TP53 and clinical presentation

The tumor suppressor p53 exerts pivotal roles in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) homeostasis. Mutations of the TP53 gene have recently been described in individuals with clonal hematopoiesis conferring substantial risk of developing blood cancers. In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), TP53 aberrations—mutations, deletions, and a combination thereof—are encountered at a constant frequency of approximately 10%. These aberrations affect HSCs transforming them into preleukemic stem cells, pinpointing their central role in leukemogenesis. AML and MDS with TP53 aberrations are characterized by complex chromosomal aberrations. Respective patients experience a dismal long-term outcome following treatment with both intensive and nonintensive regimens including novel agents like venetoclax combinations or even allogeneic HSC transplantation. However, according to the 2016 WHO classification, AML and MDS with TP53 aberrations are still regarded as separate disease entities. On the basis of their common biological and clinical features, we propose to classify AML and MDS with TP53 aberrations as a single, distinct stem cell disorder with a unique genetic make-up, comparable with the WHO classification of “AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities.” This approach will have implications for basic and translational research endeavors, aid in harmonization of current treatment strategies, and facilitate the development of master trials targeting a common deleterious driver event.

The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues is characterized by a closer integration of morphology and molecular genetics. Notwithstanding, the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with isolated del(5q) remains so far the only MDS subtype defined by a genetic abnormality. Approximately half of MDS patients carry somatic mutations in spliceosome genes, with SF3B1 being the most commonly mutated one. SF3B1 mutation identifies a condition characterized by ring sideroblasts (RS), ineffective erythropoiesis, and indolent clinical course. A large body of evidence supports recognition of SF3B1-mutant MDS as a distinct nosologic entity. To further validate this notion, we interrogated the data set of the International Working Group for the Prognosis of MDS (IWG-PM). Based on the findings of our analyses, we propose the following diagnostic criteria for SF3B1-mutant MDS: (1) cytopenia as defined by standard hematologic values, (2) somatic SF3B1 mutation, (3) morphologic dysplasia (with or without RS), and (4) bone marrow blasts

In the current World Health Organization (WHO)-classification, therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are categorized together with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and t-myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms into one subgroup independent of morphologic or prognostic features. Analyzing data of 2087 t-MDS patients from different international MDS groups to evaluate classification and prognostication tools we found that applying the WHO classification for p-MDS successfully predicts time to transformation and survival (both p

Monosomy 7 [-7] and/or partial loss of chromosome 7 [del(7q)] are associated with poor and intermediate prognosis, respectively, in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but somatic mutations may also play a key complementary role. We analyzed the impact on the outcomes of deep targeted mutational screening in 280 MDS patients with -7/del(7q) as isolated cytogenetic abnormality (86 with del(7q) and 194 with -7). Patients with del(7q) or -7 had similar demographic and disease-related characteristics. Somatic mutations were detected in 79% (93/117) of patients (82% in -7 and 73% in del(7q) group). Median number of mutations per patient was 2 (range 0-8). There was no difference in mutation frequency between the two groups. Patients harbouring >= 2 mutations had a worse outcome than patients with

The study analyzes the clonal architecture and the abnormalities involved in a series of 191 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and 2-3 clonal abnormalities. All patients were extracted from an international database. The patients were classified into six clonal subtypes (2A-3C) based on the number of abnormalities and the presentation of unrelated clones (UC) and/or a clonal evolution. UC were detected in 23/191 patients (12%). The composition of UC showed great variability. The only recurrent combination of abnormalities was del(5q) and + 8 in 8 of 23 patients (35%). In patients with clonal evolution, the clone size of the primary and secondary clone varied: Patients with -7 and + 8 in the primary clone showed a larger primary and a smaller secondary clone (-7: median 74% vs 10%; +8 73% vs 18%) while patients with del(5q) in the primary clone showed a smaller primary and a larger secondary clone (33% vs 61%). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed no significant differences regarding overall or AML-free survival between the clonal subtypes. Only the subtype 3C (3 abnormalities and clonal evolution) was an independent risk factor for developing AML (Hazard Ratio 5.5 as compared to subtype 2A, P < .05). Finally, our study confirms that the number of abnormalities clearly defines a significant risk factor for overall- as well as AML-free survival. Importantly, in patients with more than one clone, the calculation of the number of abnormalities in the entire sample instead of the number of abnormalities per clone allows a higher prognostic accuracy.

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal haematopoietic disorders that develop de novo and also secondary to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. We previously demonstrated that the risk of MDS is increased among atomic bomb survivors with significant correlation to radiation dose; however, the clinical characteristics of these survivors have not been well analysed. In this study, we investigated chromosomal abnormalities of MDS among survivors. The frequency of abnormal karyotypes was significantly higher, with more very poor risk karyotypes, according to the revised International Prognostic Scoring System, among those exposed close to the hypocentre compared with unexposed cases. However, abnormal karyotype frequency did not reflect the prognosis of exposed cases with respect to distance from the hypocentre. In addition, there was no difference in prognosis between exposed and unexposed cases. Among proximally exposed cases (

In the version of this article initially published, the affiliation provided for author Matteo Giovanni Della Porta (37Cancer Center, Humanitas Research Hospital & Humanitas University, Milan, Italy) was incorrect, and a second affiliation was missing. The correct affiliations are as follows (with subsequent affiliations renumbered accordingly): 37Humanitas Clinical and Research Center–IRCCS, Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy. 38Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a curative approach for multiple hematologic diseases. The success of alloHSCT is evaluated by analyzing the proportion of living donor cells in blood and bone marrow samples of the recipient (chimerism analysis). To monitor the engrafted cells, donor's individual genetic markers are analyzed in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples, usually by using short tandem repeat (STR) analysis. An alternative method to measure chimerism is based on insertion and deletion markers (InDels) analyzed by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR); however, this approach is rarely evaluated in clinical practice. Methods In this study, we examined the usefulness of ddPCR-based chimerism analysis against the standard STR analysis in samples around day+30 after alloHSCT in clinical practice using peripheral blood and bone marrow samples. Results The median absolute difference between ddPCR and STR analysis was 0.55% points for bone marrow chimerisms and 0.25% points for peripheral blood chimerisms, respectively, including variation in the range of maximum 2% for both methods. The results of every single sample gave the same clinical message. Conclusion According to our data, chimerism analysis by ddPCR has an excellent correlation with STR-based analyses. Due to its fast and easy applicability, the ddPCR technique is suitable for chimerism monitoring in clinical practice.

The karyotype is a strong independent prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Since the implementation of the new comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system for MDS, chromosome 7 anomalies are no longer generally assigned to poor risk features but are thoroughly separated. However, der(1;7)(q10;p10), hereinafter der(1;7), is merged into the group labeled "any other single" and belongs to the intermediate risk group, just by definition due to lack of adequate clinical data. The aim of our international collaborative was to clarify the "real" prognostic impact of der(1;7) on a homogenous and well-documented data base. We performed detailed analysis of 63 MDS patients with isolated der(1;7) constituting the largest cohort hitherto reported. Furthermore, clinical data are compared with those of patients with isolated del(7q) and isolated monosomy 7. Median overall survival (OS) of patients with der(1;7) is 26 months (hazard ratio (HR) 0.91 for del(7q) vs der(1;7) and 2.53 for monosomy 7 vs der(1;7)). The der(1;7) is associated with profound thrombocytopenia most probably causing the reduced OS which is in striking contrast to the low risk for AML transformation (HR 3.89 for del(7q) vs der(1;7) and 5.88 for monosomy 7 vs der(1;7)). Molecular karyotyping indicates that der(1;7) is generated in a single step during mitosis and that a chromosomal imbalance rather than a single disrupted gene accounts for malignancy. Thus, the current cytogenetic scoring system assigning isolated der(1;7) to the intermediate risk group is now confirmed by a sufficient data set.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myeloid neoplasm characterized by dysplasia, abnormal production and accumulation of monocytic cells and an elevated risk of transforming into acute leukemia. Over the past two decades, our knowledge about the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms in CMML has increased substantially. In parallel, better diagnostic criteria and therapeutic strategies have been developed. However, many questions remain regarding prognostication and optimal therapy. In addition, there is a need to define potential pre-phases of CMML and special CMML variants, and to separate these entities from each other and from conditions mimicking CMML. To address these unmet needs, an international consensus group met in a Working Conference in August 2018 and discussed open questions and issues around CMML, its variants, and pre-CMML conditions. The outcomes of this meeting are summarized herein and include diag nostic criteria and a proposed classification of pre-CMML conditions as well as refined minimal diagnostic criteria for classical CMML and special CMML variants, including oligomonocytic CMML and CMML associated with systemic mastocytosis. Moreover, we propose diagnostic standards and tools to distinguish between ‘normal’, pre-CMML and CMML entities. These criteria and standards should facilitate diagnostic and prognostic evaluations in daily practice and clinical studies in applied hematology., This study was supported by Austrian Science Fund (FWF) grants F4701-B20 and F4704-B20, the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology (LBI HO) and a Stem Cell Research grant from the Medical University of Vienna.

Introduction: Cytogenetic changes occur in 50% of patients (pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). Complex aberrations (cA, = 3 or more) are associated with a very poor outcome. In about 50% of the cases with cA aberrations of the TP53 locus are detectable. Those pts show an even worse outcome with a significantly shortened median overall survival (OS) compared to pts with wildtype TP53 (wtTP53). One of the most common cytogenetic aberrations in MDS is an interstitial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (5q). As an isolated aberration, it is associated with a rather favorable prognosis. As part of a cA, 5q deletions however are assumed to even worsen the prognosis further. We wanted to find out in which prevalence 5q deletions and TP53 changes appear together and how those two factors in combination or not influence the OS of pts with MDS and cA. Methods: 218 pts with MDS or sAML and cA were identified and extensively characterized. 126 of them were diagnosed with MDS, 89 with sAML and 3 with CMML. Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome banding (CBA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of the TP53 locus on 17p as well as sequencing of TP53 either by Sanger or by Next Generation Sequencing was available for all pts. Multicolour FISH (mFISH) was available for 146 pts, SNP array analysis for 42 pts. The median number of cytogenetic aberrations was 8 (range 3-50). At the time of first diagnosis with cA the median age was 72 (range: 29-95). Median OS of the entire cohort was 10.7 months (95% CI: 8.0-16.4). Results: In 146 of 218 pts we found alterations of TP53: a single hit mutation in 32 pts, a single deletion in 22 pts, a combined mutation and deletion in 67 pts and more than 1 mutation in 25 pts. The OS of those 146 pts was 6.6 months compared to 22 months of the pts with wtTP53 (p-value Conclusion: Mutations and/or deletions of TP53 show a strong association with del(5q). Both were frequent in our cohort of 218 pts with MDS and cA. There also was a large intersection of 130 pts with both del(5q) and TP53 alteration. The combination of both changes seems to further worsen the already poor prognosis of pts with MDS and cA. Our observation that those two factors appear together frequently supports the hypothesis that the presence of del(5q) may promote the acquisition of cA. This is in accordance with Hsu´s hypothesis that in small clones with a mono-allelic TP53 mutation a del(5q) may favor the loss of heterozygosity of TP53 which could in a next step lead to a higher complexity of cytogenetic aberrations (Hsu et al, 2019). It is remarkable that the presence of del(5q) in combination with a single hit status of TP53 confers the same bad prognosis compared to multi hit TP53 status (figure 1).We will continue analyzing pts with MDS and cA to examine the influence of different TP53 and 5q alterations on the prognosis, the disease progression and median OS of those pts with cA. Figure 1 Disclosures Platzbecker: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria.

In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), the evolution of risk for disease progression or death has not been systematically investigated despite being crucial for correct interpretation of prognostic risk scores. In a multicenter retrospective study, we described changes in risk over time, the consequences for basal prognostic scores, and their potential clinical implications. Major MDS prognostic risk scoring systems and their constituent individual predictors were analyzed in 7212 primary untreated MDS patients from the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS database. Changes in risk of mortality and of leukemic transformation over time from diagnosis were described. Hazards regarding mortality and acute myeloid leukemia transformation diminished over time from diagnosis in higher-risk MDS patients, whereas they remained stable in lower-risk patients. After approximately 3.5 years, hazards in the separate risk groups became similar and were essentially equivalent after 5 years. This fact led to loss of prognostic power of different scoring systems considered, which was more pronounced for survival. Inclusion of age resulted in increased initial prognostic power for survival and less attenuation in hazards. If needed for practicability in clinical management, the differing development of risks suggested a reasonable division into lower- and higher-risk MDS based on the IPSS-R at a cutoff of 3.5 points. Our data regarding time-dependent performance of prognostic scores reflect the disparate change of risks in MDS subpopulations. Lower-risk patients at diagnosis remain lower risk whereas initially high-risk patients demonstrate decreasing risk over time. This change of risk should be considered in clinical decision making.

Therapeutic regimens in chronic lymphocyte leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) are undergoing tremendous changes. In 2014, the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) ibrutinib was approve...

We genetically analyzed a group of high risk MDS/AML patients treated by a combination of azacitidine and lenalidomide. In our cohort, the extent of genetic rearrangements was associated with outcome and response to treatment. The size of total genomic aberrations as defined by molecular karyotyping (SNP-array analysis) was a predictive marker for overall survival. TP53 mutations were associated with therapy refractoriness only if accompanied by heavily rearranged chromosomes. This study suggests a potential value of molecular karyotyping as a method to objectivate comprehensively the extent of genetic alterations in high risk patients with complex karyotypes, especially if the clinical value of the size of total genomic aberrations and the fragmentation status of single chromosomes could be evaluated in larger therapy trials.

Introduction: Complex aberrant karyotypes (CK, ≥3 cytogenetic aberrations, CA) are associated with an unfavorable prognosis and an increased AML transformation rate in MDS. However, even MDS with CK (CK-MDS) are heterogeneous in terms of genetic profile and prognosis. Recently, we demonstrated that a high number of CA as well as mutations in TP53 (TP53mut) are associated with increased risk in CK-MDS (Haase et al, 2019). However, as there is a strong association between CK-MDS and TP53mut, it is still a matter of debate whether the karyotype and TP53mut are prognostically independent genetic markers. Furthermore, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 17p13 (TP53LOH), due to loss of genetic material or to copy number neutral LOH (CN-LOH), is also associated with a poor prognosis. We here aimed to characterize TP53mut andTP53LOH in CK-MDS and to elucidate the impact of cytogenetics, TP53mut and TP53LOH on the outcome of CK-MDS. Methods: We included 178 pts with MDS (N=138), CMML (N=5) and secondary AML after MDS (AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, N=35), all with CK. The median precentage of bone marrow (bm) blasts was 11% (range: 0-90%). The median age was 72 yrs (range: 30-95 yrs). The male:female ratio was 1.23:1. The number of CA was determined by banding analysis in all cases. The karyotype was confirmed by multicolor FISH in 134 cases. TP53LOH was verified by FISH analysis of the TP53 locus in 17p13 (146 analyses) and/or molecular karyotyping (MK, 41 analyses). In 144 cases further FISH probes in addition to TP53 were used. TP53mut was identified by NGS (54 cases) or Sanger sequencing (124 cases). Follow-up data for survival analyses were available for 127 pts with MDS and oligoblastic AML with less than 30% bm blasts. Results: The median number of CA was 7 (range: 3-46), 98/178 pts (55%) showed a TP53mut (median VAF: 34%, range: 8-93%) and 64/178 (36%) a TP53LOH (median FISH clone size: 65%, range: 6-99%), including 9 pts with a CN-LOH in 17p13. The CN-LOH was either identified by MK (5/41 pts (12%) where MK was available showed a CN-LOH, 4/5 with TP53mut) or by NGS (4/54 pts (7%) where NGS was available showed a VAF >70% and normal TP53-FISH). In total, a TP53mut and/or a TP53LOH was identified in 116/178 pts (65%). Overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between CK-MDS with TP53mut only, TP53LOH only, and TP53mut+TP53LOH (Fig.1). Therefore, we merged TP53mut and TP53LOH to TP53altered in all further analyses. Regarding the cytogenetic characterization of pts with TP53altered, the number of CA was significantly higher in pts with TP53altered than in pts with normal TP53 (median 9 CA (range: 3-46) vs 5 CA (range: 3-24), P The number of CA as well as the TP53 status contributed significantly to OS (Fig.2). The presence of anemia (Hb Conclusions: The presence of ≥5 CA is associated with reduced OS in CK-MDS. A TP53mut as well as a TP53LOH both further segregate outcome. The impact of the clone size of TP53mut and TP53LOH on survival is currently being evaluated. Our data imply that the TP53 status (TP53mut and/or TP53LOH) and the complexity of the karyotype are independent prognostic markers. Based on the presence of anemia, the TP53 status (TP53mut and/or TP53LOH), and the number of CA, the individual risk of CK-MDS can be estimated more accurately. This will allow to better tailor treatment decisions for individual pts with CA. Funding (FS): 2017 SGR 288-GRC Disclosures Germing: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kaivers:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel Support. Kröger:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; DKMS: Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Riemser: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding. Hertenstein:RS Media: Research Funding. Döhner:Daiichi: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bug:Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Neovii: Other: travel grant; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants; Sanofi: Other: travel grants; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nickelsen:Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Background In patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), TP53 mutations associate with high-risk presentation, complex karyotype, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progression and poor response to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These associations highlight the relevance of TP53 as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. Consistent with its role as a tumor suppressor, bi-allelic targeting of the TP53 locus is a frequent but not an obligatory event. Despite the central role of TP53 in MDS, the clinical implications of TP53 mutations in the context of allelic state have not been extensively studied. Methods Under the auspices of the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS, we sequenced a representative cohort of 3,324 peri-diagnosis MDS patients on a next generation sequencing (NGS) panel optimized for myeloid disease. Conventional G-banding analysis (CBA) was available for 2,931 patients. Focal (~3MB) gains and deletions and regions of NGS-derived copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) were assessed using an in-house algorithm CNACS. Putative oncogenic mutations in TP53 were characterized by consideration of normal controls and established population databases. A validation cohort of 1,120 samples with independent but comparable molecular and clinical annotation was sourced from a compendium of Japanese MDS data to include JALSG-MDS212, JMDP registry, and regional registries. Results NGS-derived ploidy alterations and CBA show a high genome-wide concordance. From NGS profiles, 11% of patients (n=360) are subject to cnLOH, of which 80 target the TP53 locus. We characterize 490 TP53 mutations in 380 patients, representing 11% of the cohort. Amongst those patients, 22% (n=85) and 21% (n=78) have a deletion or a cnLOH involving the TP53 locus, respectively. Taken together, these segregate patients into two TP53 states: a mono-allelic state where one wild type allele remains (33% of TP53 mutated patients, n=126); and a multi-hit state where TP53 is altered multiple times by either mutations, deletions or cnLOH (67% of TP53 mutated patients, n=254). We find that TP53 state shapes clinical presentation and outcomes. Mono-allelic TP53 patients present with more favorable disease than multi-hit TP53 patients: they are less cytopenic, have lower bone marrow blasts (median 4 vs. 9%, p Conclusions TP53 is a natural candidate for incorporation in molecularly informed risk stratification schemas (molecular IPSS-R). We show that TP53 state rather than mutation alone is an independent diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in MDS. We propose that ascertainment of TP53 state is critical in prospective clinical sequencing for risk estimation, disease monitoring and future correlative research into predictors of response to established and investigational therapies. Disclosures Bernard: Celgene: Research Funding. Hasserjian:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Promedior, Inc.: Consultancy. Germing:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Cargo:Celgene: Research Funding. Santini:Acceleron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kotsianidis:Celgene: Research Funding. Takaori-Kondo:Pfizer: Honoraria; Chugai: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Ono: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Savona:Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Patents & Royalties; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding. Ades:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Silence Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding. Neuberg:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigal Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Research Funding. Stevenson:Celgene: Research Funding. Fenaux:Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Heuser:Synimmune: Research Funding; Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin: Research Funding. Valent:Blueprint: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Deciphera: Honoraria, Research Funding. Miyazaki:Nippon-Shinyaku: Honoraria; Dainippon-Sumitomo: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Chugai: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyowa-Kirin: Honoraria. Finelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Atsuta:CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd: Honoraria. Gattermann:Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Alexion: Research Funding. Ebert:Broad Institute: Other: Contributor to a patent filing on this technology that is held by the Broad Institute.; Celgene: Research Funding; Deerfield: Research Funding. Bejar:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex/Otsuka: Consultancy; Modus Outcomes: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy. Greenberg:Notable Labs: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; H3 Biotech: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ogawa:Qiagen Corporation: Patents & Royalties; ChordiaTherapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; RegCell Corporation: Equity Ownership; Dainippon-Sumitomo Pharmaceutical, Inc.: Research Funding; Kan Research Laboratory, Inc.: Consultancy; Asahi Genomics: Equity Ownership. Papaemmanuil:Celgene: Research Funding.

The IPSS-R proved to be a powerful tool for the assessment of prognosis in MDS patients. We aimed at a validation of the IPSS-R for patients with MDS harboring deletion (5q) isolated or accompanied by additional aberrations. The study was based on 444 MDS patients from MDS centers in Europe. 67% of the patients were female, median age was 69 years. 43.5% had MDS del(5q), 5.9% were diagnosed with RCUD, 2.0% RARS, 18.4% RCMD, 14.6% RAEB-I and 15.5% RAEB-II. According to the IPSS-R, there were 9.9% very low, 39.6% low, 16.6% intermediate, 12.8% high, 20.9% very high risk patients. For very low risk patients survival was 7.5 years, low 9.0 years, intermediate 6.5 years, high 1.5 years and very high 0.7 years (p < 0.001). For low and intermediate risk, the probability of AML evolution was significantly different (p = 0.03) as well as for high versus very high risk groups (p = 0.002). The IPSS-R proved to be an appropriate prognostic tool for MDS with del(5q).

Genetic predisposition due to germline mutations in a number of genes (e.g., ETV6 , GATA2 , and RUNX1 ) has been recognized as an important cause of myeloid malignancies. In the 2016 update of the World Health Organization classification of hematological malignancies, a new section, ‘myeloid

Clonal cytogenetic evolution (CE) (i.e., acquisition of new chromosomal aberrations over time) is relevant for the progression of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We performed detailed analysis of CE in 729 patients with MDS and related disorders. Patients with CE showed shorter survival (median OS 18.0 versus 53.9 months; P P P P P = 0.020) and del (17p) (P = 0.002) were especially unfavorable. Extending the evolution patterns from Tricot et al. (1985) forming five subgroups, prognosis was best (median OS not reached) in patients with “transient clones/changing clone size”, whereas those with “CE at diagnosis” showed very poor outcomes (P

Clinical features of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) could be influenced by many factors, such as disease intrinsic factors (e.g., morphologic, cytogenetic, molecular), extrinsic factors (e.g, management, environment), and ethnicity. Several previous studies have suggested such differences between Asian and European/USA countries. In this study, to elucidate potential differences in primary untreated MDS between Japanese (JPN) and Caucasians (CAUC), we analyzed the data from a large international database collected by the International Working Group for Prognosis of MDS (300 and 5838 patients, respectively). JPN MDS were significantly younger with more severe cytopenias, and cytogenetic differences: less del(5q) and more +1/+1q, -1/del(1p), der(1;7), -9/del(9q), del(16q), and del(20q). Although differences in time to acute myeloid leukemia transformation did not occur, a significantly better survival in JPN was demonstrated, even after the adjustment for age and FAB subtypes, especially in lower, but not in higher prognostic risk categories. Certain clinical factors (cytopenias, blast percentage, cytogenetic risk) had different impact on survival and time to transformation to leukemia between the two groups. Although possible confounding events (e.g., environment, diet, and access to care) could not be excluded, our results indicated the existence of clinically relevant ethnic differences regarding survival in MDS between JPN and CAUC patients. The good performance of the IPSS-R in both CAUC and JP patients underlines that its common risk model is adequate for CAUC and JP., Leukemia Research, 73, pp.51-57; 2018

Introduction: 5-azacytidine treatment prolongs survival in older patients with high-risk MDS compared to standard of care options outside allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) wich is still the only potentially curative treatment option that is however associated with a considerable treatment-related morbidity and mortality (TRM). Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) prior to transplantation has broadened the application of this therapeutic approach also to elderly MDS patients. Here we present results from a prospective multicenter trial of the German MDS and Cooperative Transplant Study Group comparing 5-azacytidine (5-Aza) treatment alone with 5-Aza induction followed by AHSCT according to donor availability in elderly patients with newly-diagnosed untreated HR MDS aged 55-70 years (EudraCT Number 2010-018467-42). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at three years after 5 Aza induction in both arms; major secondary endpoints were to assess the response rate, event-free survival (EFS) at three years, toxicity, treatment-related mortality (TRM) and the impact of the comorbidity-index (HCT-CI) on outcome in both treatment arms. Methods and Patients Patients with proven de novo or therapy-related MDS / CMML (WBC A donor search was started at the time of inclusion and all patients were scheduled to receive 4 to 6 cycles of 5-Aza induction therapy. In case a HLA -identical sibling or a 10/10 HLA compatible unrelated donor could be identified during the first cycles of 5-Aza and patients had at least stable disease they were allocated for a busulfan-based RIC allograft. In case no suitable donor could be identified 5-Aza was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. This protocol-defined primary analysis uses the full 5% alpha error for the primary analysis. A final follow-up analysis will be performed once all patients have been followed-up at least for three years but no later than January 2019. Results Between June 2011 and November 2016 190 patients with a median age of 63 years from 14 German centers were included into the trial. Following 5-Aza induction, only 109 out of 190 patients (57%) were eligible for allocation to one of the treatment arms and proceeded to AHSCT (n=83) or continued 5-Aza therapy (n=26). Reasons for premature study termination of 81 patients (43%) within the first 5-Aza cycles included progressive disease (n=25; 31%), death (n=14; 17%), inclusion or exclusion criteria not fulfilled (n=18, 22%), withdrawal of informed consent (n=7; 9%), adverse events (n=7; 9%) or other reasons (n=10; 12%). Regarding the primary study endpoint and after 5 Aza induction therapy in an intention to treat analysis the OS at 3 years was 49% (95% CI: 36-61%) after AHSCT and 22% (95% CI: 6-44%) after continuous treatment with 5-Aza (p= 0.027). The time dependent Hazard ratio for AHSCT decreased over time: while at 1 year the HR was still 1.4 due to early TRM, this HR decreased to 0.35 at 2 years and 0.09 at 3 years. EFS at 3 years was 35% (95% CI: 22-48%) after AHSCT and 0% after 5-Aza continuous treatment (p< 0.001). The TRM after AHSCT at 1 and 3 years was 17% (95% CI 10-26%) and 23% (95% CI: 14-33%), respectively. Conclusions This prospective phase 3 study comparing 5-Aza followed by AHSCT with continuous 5-Aza therapy in older patients (55 to 70 years) suffering from higher-risk MDS demonstrates an improved EFS and OS in favor of AHSCT. Induction therapy with 5-Aza prior to AHSCT is associated with a considerable rate of drop outs due to progression, adverse events, and mortality prior to AHSCT. The study was registered under ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01404741. The study was supported by a research grant from Celgene, Germany. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Kroeger: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bethge:Miltenyi Biotec GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii GmbH: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schlenk:Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kobbe:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bug:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel Grant; Celgene: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma: Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Other: Travel Grant; Amgen: Honoraria; Neovii: Other: Travel Grant. Scheid:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Krönke:Celgene: Honoraria. Stelljes:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Beelen:Medac: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding.