Search

Your search keyword '"Desole, Martina"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Desole, Martina"
6 results on '"Desole, Martina"'

1. Designing a Master Course Curriculum for Innovation Through Living Labs

Author

Diamantis, Konstantinos G., Konstantinidis, Evdokimos I., Santonen, Teemu, Kehayia, Eva, Petsani, Despoina, Desole, Martina, Spagnoli, Francesca, Bamidis, Panagiotis D., Akan, Ozgur, Editorial Board Member, Bellavista, Paolo, Editorial Board Member, Cao, Jiannong, Editorial Board Member, Coulson, Geoffrey, Editorial Board Member, Dressler, Falko, Editorial Board Member, Ferrari, Domenico, Editorial Board Member, Gerla, Mario, Editorial Board Member, Kobayashi, Hisashi, Editorial Board Member, Palazzo, Sergio, Editorial Board Member, Sahni, Sartaj, Editorial Board Member, Shen, Xuemin, Editorial Board Member, Stan, Mircea, Editorial Board Member, Jia, Xiaohua, Editorial Board Member, Zomaya, Albert Y., Editorial Board Member, Crawford, David, editor, Foss, Jeremy, editor, Lambert, Nicholas, editor, Reed, Martin, editor, and Kriebel, Jennah, editor

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Harmonizing Living Lab Services: Towards consolidated service portfolio.

Author

Santonen, Teemu, Petsani, Despoina, Petronikolou, Silia, Desole, Martina, Bamidis, Panagiotis, and Konstantinidis, Evdokimos

Subjects
TECHNOLOGICAL innovations, ARTIFICIAL intelligence, INNOVATION management, DEEP learning, DIGITAL technology
Abstract

Living labs share common elements but have multiple different implementations. Prior studies have revealed a lack of research on effective management approaches for living labs. Service harmonization is suggested as an approach to improve efficiency and to ensure the consistency of services and results regardless of the service provider. This study evaluates the living lab service portfolio and proposes a harmonized service categorization to contribute to ongoing discussions on living lab harmonization. The suggested framework consists of 18 services for Customer acquisition, 13 for Detailed project planning and 29 for Project implementation and dissemination phase as well as 9 repositories in Innovation ecosystem orchestration. Services are also classified into Back-office (N=29), R&D services (N=21), and 3) Auxiliary services (N=4). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024

3. A harmonized assessment method and KPIs for evaluating Living Labs.

Author

Vervoort, Koen, Konstantinidis, Evdokimos, Desole, Martina, Onur, Omer, Trousse, Brigitte, Woodcock, Andree, Garatea, Jokin, Petsani, Despoina, Ponomareva, Anastasia, Roset Pérez, Berta, Gamboa, Gonzalo, and Bamidis, Panagiotis

Subjects
DIGITAL transformation, INFORMATION & communication technologies, ARTIFICIAL intelligence, TECHNOLOGICAL innovations, RESEARCH & development
Abstract

Currently, Living Labs are evaluated in multiple different ways which is hampering comparison. This paper proposes a harmonized method combining various elements (6 chapters, 15 criteria and 34 KPIs), mainly based on the standardized evaluation framework developed by Vervoort et al. (2022) for evaluating the diverse types of Living Labs. Such a harmonized approach will help to simplify evaluation processes and will allow to compare the stability and maturity of LLs in a uniform manner. The premise is that creating a harmonized assessment method will increase the sustainability of Living Labs by providing them a method that allows comparison of the maturity of multiple types of Living Labs without losing sight of the particularities of individual Living Labs within their specific contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024

4. Harmonizing the evaluation of living labs: a standardized evaluation framework

Author

Vervoort, Koen, Evdokimos Konstantinidis, Santonen, Teemu, Petsani, Despoina, Servais, David, De Boer, Danielle, Spagnoli, Francesca, Onur, Omer, Bertolin, Juan, Trousse, Brigitte, Desole, Martina, and Bamidis, Panos

Abstract

Candidate LLs joining LL associations and networks (ENoLL, Forum LLSA...) undergo quality- assessment processes based on specific criteria and evaluation frameworks to guarantee members meet their LL standards. Currently, limited attention is paid on how such evaluation methods can contribute to future LL-performance. The need to deeper understand the architectural aspects of LLs and further study effective management-approaches has been raised by other authors. Schuurman (2015) proposed a macro–meso-micro-level approach for classifying LLs. Despite its potential value, this three-level analysis approach has not yet been fully recognized in existing LL evaluation frameworks. The adoption of a harmonized macro-meso-micro evaluation approach, with a clear focus on the macro-level could support the development of LL towards sustainability, impact and efficacy. This paper aims to define a set of harmonized weighted criteria for a comprehensive LL evaluation framework to be used for assessing LLs on all three levels based on multi-method research approaches.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results