Search

Mandibular deformities negatively affect the daily activities of the patients and may cause temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and Le Fort I osteotomy are effective treatments to correct the mandibular deformities. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of the BSSRO with or without Le Fort I on the stress distributions of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) of the patients with mandibular deformities under centric occlusion based on finite element (FE) method. Preoperative and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of twenty-four patients diagnosed with mandibular prognathism, including ten patients with BSSRO and another 14 patients with bimaxillary osteotomy (BSSRO with Le Fort I), were used to construct maxillofacial models. Ten asymptomatic individuals were also performed CBCT scanning and defined as the control group. In addition, the muscle forces and boundary conditions corresponding to centric occlusions were applied on each model. For the preoperative groups with both the BSSRO and bimaxillary osteotomies, the average peak contact stresses of the TMJs were both greater than those of the control group. After the surgeries, the contact stresses of the discs and temporal bones of both groups considerably decreased. However, the contact stresses on the condyles slightly increased after BSSRO but decreased after bimaxillary osteotomy. The TMJs of the patients with maxillofacial deformities suffered abnormal tensile and compressive stresses compared with the asymptomatic subjects under centric occlusion. Both of the BSSRO and bimaxillary osteotomy could improve the risk stress distributions of the TMJs.

Total knee arthroplasty surgery is an increasingly common procedure for the treatment of uni- and tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis, particularly in advanced stages and in the older population. Its usage is being extended to younger patients, where implant longevity is of concern. In the younger age group, especially with early disease, other options merit consideration. On the other hand, it may not be possible for elderly patients with medical comorbidities to undergo joint replacement surgery. Proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) has recently been advocated to treat medial knee osteoarthritis. Although there have been clinical reports showing promising outcomes, the biomechanical basis of this procedure is still unclear. We performed a cadaveric study to investigate the effect of PFO on proximal tibial strain. Eight unpaired cadaveric lower limb specimens were loaded in compression at 2 times body weight. Strain gauges were mounted on various sites on the proximal tibia and fibula. After PFO, there was a significant increase in the lateral tibial strain adjacent to the proximal tibiofibular joint ( P Orthopedics . 2022;45(5):314–319.]

The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical effect of bimaxillary osteotomies on patients with mandibular retraction. Mandibular retraction, as a typical maxillofacial deformity, and has great adverse effects on TMJ. Bimaxillary osteotomies are widely used to correct symptoms of mandibular retraction. It is necessary to understand the effect of surgery on temporomandibular disc (TMJ). Five patients with mandibular retraction and ten asymptomatic subjects were involved in this study. And finite element models of preoperative, postoperative and control group were constructed based on the CT data. Nine sets of concentrate forces were used to simulate the muscle effect and contact method was used to simulate the interaction within the TMJs and dentitions. The results showed that bimaxillary osteotomies could effectively improve the maxillofacial morphology and alleviate the overload in TMJ. And the facial asymmetry and right chewing side preference could cause imbalanced stress distributions in the TMJs and interfere the surgical treatment.

Medial longitudinal arch (MLA) strengthening has been considered an important part of successful flatfoot treatment. But, to date, the biomechanical loading behavior of the medial arch in flatfoot has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the MLA moment, MLA deformation angle, foot kinematics and ground reaction forces (GRF) in both normal foot and flatfoot groups.Each participant's foot was classified according to arch type using foot prints and radiographs. Twenty-eight non-obese adults (13 flatfeet and 15 normal feet) were involved. The biomechanics data were collected in a 3D motion analysis laboratory. The MLA biomechanics were calculated. Hindfoot and forefoot kinematics were also analyzed.The flatfoot group had a significantly greater peak eversion MLA moment (p = 0.005) and a smaller peak MLA deformation angle (p0.05) during specific subphases. The peak of hindfoot plantarflexion (p0.05) and internal rotation (p0.05) and the peak of forefoot abduction ( p0.05) in the specific subphases were greater in the flatfoot group. The flatfoot group also had significantly smaller peak vertical GRF ( p0.05) during late stance and larger peak medial GRF (p0.05) during mid stance.This study found a significantly greater eversion deforming force acting at the MLA structure, greater hindfoot and forefoot motion, less MLA flexibility and abnormal GRF in a flatfoot group during walking, which reflected the deficit of foot function in a flatfoot group.