Search

Determination of functional capacity in cognitively impaired persons living with HIV (PLHIV) is pivotal to the accurate diagnosis of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Functional data is typically collected through self-report. Reliability concerns arise with memory and executive functioning impairments, which could compromise the integrity of self-report and result in inaccurate HAND diagnoses. The current study tested the accuracy of older PLHIV functional reports through examination of concordance rates between self-report and caregiver's (CG) report. Cross-sectional cognitive, mood, and functional status data were sampled from the Manhattan HIV Brain Bank. Participants and caregivers independently completed an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire, producing 78 participant-caregiver dyads. Functional report concordance was operationalized by calculating differences between participant and CG ADL total scores. Assessment pairs differing by 2 or more points were considered to be discordant. Analyses revealed that one-third of the patient sample was discordant in the ADL report. ANOVA revealed that PLHIV overestimating their functional impairments, were significantly older, more educated, and more depressed than other participants. Global cognitive functioning was not associated with concordance. Thus, the majority of PLHIV were consistent with their caregivers' ADL report, and older age and increased depressive symptomatology, but not cognitive status, were factors associated with discordance.

To provide education regarding the critical importance of test security for neuropsychological and psychological tests, and to establish recommendations for best practices for maintaining test security in forensic, clinical, teaching, and research settings. Previous test security guidelines were not adequately specified.Neuropsychologists practicing in a broad range of settings collaborated to develop detailed and specific guidance regarding test security to best ensure continued viability of neuropsychological and psychological tests. Implications of failing to maintain test security for both the practice of neuropsychology and for society at large were identified. Types of test data that can be safely disclosed to nonpsychologists are described.Specific procedures can be followed that will minimize risk of invalidating future use of neuropsychological and psychological measures.Clinical neuropsychologists must commit to protecting sensitive neuropsychological and psychological test information from exposure to nonpsychologists, and now have specific recommendations that will guide that endeavor.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-I (HIV) is a health disparities issue that affects culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) and underrepresented minority populations to a greater degree than non-Hispanic white populations. Neurologically speaking, CALD populations experience worse HIV-related health outcomes, which are exacerbated by inadequate neurocognitive measures, poor normative samples, and the complex interplay of sociocultural factors that may affect test interpretation. Although cross-cultural neuropsychologists are working diligently to correct this gap in the literature, currently, studies examining neurocognitive outcomes among CALD populations are sparse. The most well-studied CALD groups are of African American/Black and Latinx adults in the US, and the chapter therefore focuses on these studies. There is more limited work among other populations in the US, such as Asians, Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders, and American Indians/Alaskan Natives, and even fewer studies for many CALD populations outside of the US. For example, HIV neuropsychology data is rare or nonexistent in the First Peoples of Australia and Indigenous People of Canada. It is often not adequately reported in Europe for the migrant populations within those countries or other world regions that have historically large multicultural populations (e.g., South America, Caribbean countries, Asia, and Africa). Therefore, this chapter reviews HIV-related health disparities faced by CALD populations with focus on North American research where it has been specifically studied, with particular attention given to disparities in HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND). International data was also included for research with focus on First Peoples of Australia and Indigenous People of Canada. The chapter also examines other sociocultural and health factors, including global and regional (e.g., rural versus urban) considerations, migration, and gender. Further, guidelines for incorporating sociocultural consideration into assessment and interpretation of neurocognitive data and HAND diagnosis when working with HIV-positive CALD populations that would be relevant internationally are provided.

Byrd provided a response to the commentary by Cory on the role of White privilege in neuropsychology wherein an argument is introduced for the creation of a critical antiracist neuropsychology. In this brief reply, a discipline-specific context is introduced, and readers are encouraged to move beyond raised awareness of White privilege to commitment to dismantling the structures which support it.

The Wide Range Achievement Test, 3rd edition, Reading-Recognition subtest (WRAT-3 RR) is an established measure of premorbid ability. Furthermore, its long-term reliability is not well documented, particularly in diverse populations with CNS-relevant disease. Objective: We examined test-retest reliability of the WRAT-3 RR over time in an HIV+ sample of predominantly racial/ethnic minority adults. Method: Participants (N = 88) completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, including the WRAT-3 RR, on at least two separate study visits. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed using scores from baseline and follow-up assessments to determine the test-retest reliability of the WRAT-3 RR across racial/ethnic groups and changes in medical (immunological) and clinical (neurocognitive) factors. Additionally, Fisher’s Z tests were used to determine the significance of the differences between ICCs. Results: The average test-retest interval was 58.7 months (SD=36.4). The overall WRAT-3 RR test-retest reliability was high (r = .97, p < .001), and remained robust across all demographic, medical, and clinical variables (all r’s > .92). Intraclass correlation coefficients did not differ significantly between the subgroups tested (all Fisher’s Z p’s > .05). Conclusions: Overall, this study supports the appropriateness of word-reading tests, such as the WRAT-3 RR, for use as stable premorbid IQ estimates among ethnically diverse groups. Moreover, this study supports the reliability of this measure in the context of change in health and neurocognitive status, and in lengthy inter-test intervals. These findings offer strong rationale for reading as a “hold” test, even in the presence of a chronic, variable disease such as HIV.