Search

Purpose As novel tracers are continuously under development, it is important to obtain reliable radiation dose estimates to optimize the amount of activity that can be administered while keeping radiation burden within acceptable limits. Organ segmentation is required for quantification of specific uptake in organs of interest and whole-body dosimetry but is a time-consuming task which induces high interobserver variability. Therefore, we explored using manual segmentations versus an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated segmentation tool as a pre-processing step for calculating whole-body effective doses to determine the influence of variability in volumetric whole-organ segmentations on dosimetry. Procedures PET/CT data of six patients undergoing imaging with 89Zr-labelled pembrolizumab were included. Manual organ segmentations were performed, using in-house developed software, and biodistribution information was obtained. Based on the activity biodistribution information, residence times were calculated. The residence times served as input for OLINDA/EXM version 1.0 (Vanderbilt University, 2003) to calculate the whole-body effective dose (mSv/MBq). Subsequently, organ segmentations were performed using RECOMIA, a cloud-based AI platform for nuclear medicine and radiology research. The workflow for calculating residence times and whole-body effective doses, as described above, was repeated. Results Data were acquired on days 2, 4, and 7 post-injection, resulting in 18 scans. Overall analysis time per scan was approximately 4 h for manual segmentations compared to ≤ 30 min using AI-based segmentations. Median Jaccard similarity coefficients between manual and AI-based segmentations varied from 0.05 (range 0.00–0.14) for the pancreas to 0.78 (range 0.74–0.82) for the lungs. Whole-body effective doses differed minimally for the six patients with a median difference in received mSv/MBq of 0.52% (range 0.15–1.95%). Conclusion This pilot study suggests that whole-body dosimetry calculations can benefit from fast, automated AI-based whole organ segmentations.

Flow chart of patients with BRCA1/2 alterations submitted to the study team between September 2016 and December 2019, and reasons for drop-out, rejection or screen failure. Abbreviations: VUS = Variant of Unknown Significance, LOH = Loss of Heterozygosity.

Purpose:Biodistribution of bispecific antibodies in patients is largely unknown. We therefore performed a feasibility study in 9 patients with advanced gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas to explore AMG 211 biodistribution (also known as MEDI-565), an approximately 55 kDa bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) directed against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) on tumor cells and cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) on T-cells.Experimental Design:89Zr-labeled AMG 211 as tracer was administered alone or with cold AMG 211, for PET imaging before and/or during AMG 211 treatment.Results:Before AMG 211 treatment, the optimal imaging dose was 200-μg 89Zr-AMG 211 + 1,800-μg cold AMG 211. At 3 hours, the highest blood pool standardized uptake value (SUV)mean was 4.0, and tracer serum half-life was 3.3 hours. CD3-mediated uptake was clearly observed in CD3-rich lymphoid tissues including spleen and bone marrow (SUVmean 3.2 and 1.8, respectively), and the SUVmean decreased more slowly than in other healthy tissues. 89Zr-AMG 211 remained intact in plasma and was excreted predominantly via the kidneys in degraded forms. Of 43 visible tumor lesions, 37 were PET quantifiable, with a SUVmax of 4.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.7–4.4] at 3 hours using the optimal imaging dose. The tracer uptake differed between tumor lesions 5-fold within and 9-fold between patients. During AMG 211 treatment, tracer was present in the blood pool, whereas tumor lesions were not visualized, possibly reflecting target saturation.Conclusions:This first-in-human study shows high, specific 89Zr-AMG 211 accumulation in CD3-rich lymphoid tissues, as well as a clear, inter- and intraindividual heterogeneous tumor uptake.

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary methods, Supplementary Fig. S1, Supplemtary Table S1, Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Table S3

Supplementary Legend

There is a clear unmet need to improve early colon cancer management. This review encompasses the current systemic treatment landscape and summarises novel and pivotal trials. The Immunoscore and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) are studied to evaluate which patients should receive no, 3, or 6 months of adjuvant treatment. Several trials also test escalating treatment strategies for non-cleared ctDNA following standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Advances made in treating patients with metastatic colon cancer are now being translated to the early colon cancer setting. Two ongoing RCTs study immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with microsatellite instable high (MSI-H) early colon cancer as adjuvant treatment. Neo-adjuvant treatment is being studied in several ongoing RCTs as well. The complete response rate in patients with MSI-H tumours following ICI in neoadjuvant trials has potential organ-sparing implications.

Background: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody treatment is standard of care for melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accurately predicting which patients will benefit is currently not possible. Tumor uptake and biodistribution of the PD-1 antibody might play a role. Therefore, we carried out a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging study with zirconium-89 ( 89Zr)-labeled pembrolizumab before PD-1 antibody treatment. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma or NSCLC received 37 MBq (1 mCi) 89Zr-pembrolizumab (∼2.5 mg antibody) intravenously plus 2.5 or 7.5 mg unlabeled pembrolizumab. After that, up to three PET scans were carried out on days 2, 4, and 7. Next, PD-1 antibody treatment was initiated. 89Zr-pembrolizumab tumor uptake was calculated as maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max) and expressed as geometric mean. Normal organ uptake was calculated as SUV mean and expressed as a mean. Tumor response was assessed according to (i)RECIST v1.1. Results: Eighteen patients, 11 with melanoma and 7 with NSCLC, were included. The optimal dose was 5 mg pembrolizumab, and the optimal time point for PET scanning was day 7. The tumor SUV max did not differ between melanoma and NSCLC (4.9 and 6.5, P = 0.49). Tumor 89Zr-pembrolizumab uptake correlated with tumor response (P trend = 0.014) and progression-free (P = 0.0025) and overall survival (P = 0.026). 89Zr-pembrolizumab uptake at 5 mg was highest in the spleen with a mean SUV mean of 5.8 (standard deviation ±1.8). There was also 89Zr-pembrolizumab uptake in Waldeyer's ring, in normal lymph nodes, and at sites of inflammation. Conclusion: 89Zr-pembrolizumab uptake in tumor lesions correlated with treatment response and patient survival. 89Zr-pembrolizumab also showed uptake in lymphoid tissues and at sites of inflammation.

Purpose: CX-072, a PD-L1–targeting Probody therapeutic, is engineered to be activated by tumor proteases that remove a masking peptide. To study effects on biodistribution and pharmacokinetics, we performed 89Zr-CX-072 positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Experimental Design: Patients received ∼1 mg, 37 MBq 89Zr-CX-072 plus 0, 4, or 9 mg unlabeled CX-072 and PET scans at days 2, 4, and 7. After that, treatment comprised 10 mg/kg CX-072 q2 weeks (n = 7) + 3 mg/kg ipilimumab q3w 4× (n = 1). Normal organ tracer uptake was expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV)mean and tumor uptake as SUVmax. PD-L1 expression was measured immunohistochemically in archival tumor tissue. Results: Three of the eight patients included received 10-mg protein dose resulting in a blood pool mean SUVmean ± SD of 4.27 ± 0.45 on day 4, indicating sufficient available tracer. Tumor uptake was highest at day 7, with a geometric mean SUVmax 5.89 (n = 113) and present in all patients. The median follow-up was 12 weeks (4–76+). One patient experienced stable disease and two patients a partial response. PD-L1 tumor expression was 90% in one patient and ≤1% in the other patients. Mean SUVmean ± SD day 4 at 10 mg in the spleen was 8.56 ± 1.04, bone marrow 2.21 ± 0.46, and liver 4.97 ± 0.97. Four patients out of seven showed uptake in normal lymph nodes and Waldeyer's ring. The tracer was intact in the serum or plasma. Conclusions: 89Zr-CX-072 showed tumor uptake, even in lesions with ≤1% PD-L1 expression, and modest uptake in normal lymphoid organs, with no unexpected uptake in other healthy tissues.

Contains fulltext : 238268.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) IMPORTANCE: To date, no randomized clinical trials have investigated perioperative systemic therapy relative to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) alone for resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of perioperative systemic therapy in patients with resectable CPM and the response of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An open-label, parallel-group phase 2 randomized clinical trial in all 9 Dutch tertiary centers for the surgical treatment of CPM enrolled participants between June 15, 2017, and January 9, 2019. Participants were patients with pathologically proven isolated resectable CPM who did not receive systemic therapy within 6 months before enrollment. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization to perioperative systemic therapy or CRS-HIPEC alone. Perioperative systemic therapy comprised either four 3-week neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin), six 2-week neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin), or six 2-week neoadjuvant cycles of FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) and either four 3-week adjuvant cycles of capecitabine or six 2-week adjuvant cycles of fluorouracil with leucovorin. Bevacizumab was added to the first 3 (CAPOX) or 4 (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) neoadjuvant cycles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportions of macroscopic complete CRS-HIPEC and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity. Key secondary outcomes were centrally assessed rates of objective radiologic and major pathologic response of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment. Analyses were done modified intention-to-treat in patients starting neoadjuvant treatment (experimental arm) or undergoing upfront surgery (control arm). RESULTS: In 79 patients included in the analysis (43 [54%] men; mean [SD] age, 62 [10] years), experimental (n = 37) and control (n = 42) arms did not differ significantly regarding the proportions of macroscopic complete CRS-HIPEC (33 of 37 [89%] vs 36 of 42 [86%] patients; risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.23; P = .74) and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity (8 of 37 [22%] vs 14 of 42 [33%] patients; risk ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31-1.37; P = .25). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Objective radiologic and major pathologic response rates of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment were 28% (9 of 32 evaluable patients) and 38% (13 of 34 evaluable patients), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized phase 2 trial in patients diagnosed with resectable CPM, perioperative systemic therapy seemed feasible, safe, and able to induce response of CPM, justifying a phase 3 trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02758951.

As novel tracers are continuously under development, it is important to obtain reliable radiation dose estimates to optimize the amount of activity that can be administered while keeping radiation burden within acceptable limits. Organ segmentation is required for quantification of specific uptake in organs of interest and whole-body dosimetry but is a time-consuming task which induces high interobserver variability. Therefore, we explored using manual segmentations versus an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated segmentation tool as a pre-processing step for calculating whole-body effective doses to determine the influence of variability in volumetric whole-organ segmentations on dosimetry.PET/CT data of six patients undergoing imaging withData were acquired on days 2, 4, and 7 post-injection, resulting in 18 scans. Overall analysis time per scan was approximately 4 h for manual segmentations compared to ≤ 30 min using AI-based segmentations. Median Jaccard similarity coefficients between manual and AI-based segmentations varied from 0.05 (range 0.00-0.14) for the pancreas to 0.78 (range 0.74-0.82) for the lungs. Whole-body effective doses differed minimally for the six patients with a median difference in received mSv/MBq of 0.52% (range 0.15-1.95%).This pilot study suggests that whole-body dosimetry calculations can benefit from fast, automated AI-based whole organ segmentations.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce durable responses in multiple different tumor types. Lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) is one of the immune checkpoints for which therapeutic antibodies are being developed. PET imaging with radiolabeled ICIs can visualize whether the drug reaches the tumor, and might serve as a target expression readout. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety of the radiolabeled LAG-3 antibody 89Zr-DFO-REGN3767, to determine the optimal tracer dose and imaging time point, and to get insight into 89Zr-DFO-REGN3767 whole body distribution. Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors received 37 MBq 89Zr-DFO-REGN3767 together with unlabeled antibody to achieve a 2, 5, 10, 20, or 40 mg total protein dose (NCT04706715). Patients underwent PET/CT scans on days 0, 2, 4, and 7 after injection, followed by a tumor biopsy. After that, they received treatment with cemiplimab alone or combined with platinum-containing chemotherapy. PET scans were analyzed by placing volumes of interest (VOIs) in tumor lesions and normal tissues. Tracer uptake was measured in the VOIs and expressed as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for tumor lesions and as the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) for normal tissues. Results The 16 included patients experienced no 89Zr-DFO-REGN3767-related side effects. Tumor-to-blood ratios for all dose levels increased from days 0 to 7. Therefore, imaging 7 days after tracer injection was deemed optimal to achieve the highest contrast. The 40 mg tracer dose resulted in the most favorable blood kinetics. At this dose, tracer uptake in tumor lesions (n = 17) varied between patients (geometric mean SUVmax 6.2; SD 1.7). In normal tissues, uptake was seen in the spleen (x̄ 11.2; SD 1.6), and bone marrow (x̄ 2.2; SD 0.7), which increased from days 0 to 7. Tracer uptake was visually present in regions with inflammation. Conclusion 89Zr-DFO-REGN3767 PET imaging is feasible and studied patients did not experience tracer related side effects. Optimal imaging results were achieved with the 40 mg protein dose and imaging on day 7 89Zr-DFO-REGN3767 shows specific accumulation in LAG-3 rich tissues and tumor lesions. Citation Format: Pim P. van de Donk, Lotte M. Smit, Joyce van Sluis, Wim Timens, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Marjolijn N. Lub- de Hooge, Sjoerd G. Elias, Jourik A. Gietema, Claudia A. van Winkel, JuAn Wang, Jason Giurleo, Thomas Uldrick, Hung Kam Cheung, Hilde Jalving, Sjoukje F. Oosting, Daan G. Knapen, Derk-Jan A. de Groot, Elisabeth G. de Vries. LAG-3 PET imaging in patients with cancer before immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5611.

PurposeThe aim of this study was to retrospectively compare F-18-FDOPA versus Ga-68-DOTATOC PET in lesion detection rates and laboratory tumor markers in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Patients and MethodsAll patients with histologically proven NEN between May 2015 and February 2019 were included who underwent both F-18-DOPA and Ga-68-DOTATOC PET scans within 6 months from each other (mean, 75; median, 38; range, 2-168 days). All patients, except those with pancreatic NEN, received carbidopa before F-18-DOPA PET. Based on the number of lesions on both modalities, patients were divided into 3 categories: more lesions on F-18-DOPA (DOPA > DOTA), more lesions on Ga-68-DOTATOC (DOTA > DOPA), and equal number of lesions (DOPA = DOTA). Tumor markers chromogranin A, serotonin, and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) within a maximum of 3 months around either scan were retrieved from the patients' charts. ResultsF-18-DOPA revealed significantly more lesions compared with Ga-68-DOTATOC (611 vs 385, P DOTA group with 16 small intestinal (SI) NENs, 3 large intestinal, 4 pancreatic, and 1 tumor of unknown origin (TUO). For the 9 patients in the DOTA > DOPA group, 4 were SI, 2 pancreatic, 1 lung, and 2 TUOs. Twelve patients in the DOPA = DOTA group had 6 pancreatic tumors, 3 SI, 1 ovarian, and 2 TUOs. Only serotonin and 5-HIAA showed significant higher values for DOPA > DOTA compared with DOTA > DOPA (mean 24 vs 4, P DOTA patients. ConclusionsThere is an advantage of carbidopa pretreated F-18-DOPA over Ga-68-DOTATOC PET, especially for large intestinal NENs with high levels of biomarkers. There seems to be a relationship between increased biomarker value and improved lesion detection rates with the F-18-DOPA PET scan, which requires further prospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic relapses remain a major problem in locally advanced rectal cancer. Using short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and delayed surgery, the Rectal cancer And Preoperative Induction therapy followed by Dedicated Operation (RAPIDO) trial aimed to reduce distant metastases without compromising locoregional control. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, participants were recruited from 54 centres in the Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, Slovenia, Denmark, Norway, and the USA. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, had a biopsy-proven, newly diagnosed, primary, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, which was classified as high risk on pelvic MRI (with at least one of the following criteria: clinical tumour [cT] stage cT4a or cT4b, extramural vascular invasion, clinical nodal [cN] stage cN2, involved mesorectal fascia, or enlarged lateral lymph nodes), were mentally and physically fit for chemotherapy, and could be assessed for staging within 5 weeks before randomisation. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a management system with a randomly varying block design (each block size randomly chosen to contain two to four allocations), stratified by centre, ECOG performance status, cT stage, and cN stage, to either the experimental or standard of care group. All investigators remained masked for the primary endpoint until a prespecified number of events was reached. Patients allocated to the experimental treatment group received short-course radiotherapy (5?*?5 Gy over a maximum of 8 days) followed by six cycles of CAPOX chemotherapy (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, and a chemotherapy-free interval between days 15-21) or nine cycles of FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, leucovorin [folinic acid] 200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 2, followed by bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 intravenously and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously for 22 h on days 1 and 2, and a chemotherapy-free interval between days 3-14) followed by total mesorectal excision. Choice of CAPOX or FOLFOX4 was per physician discretion or hospital policy. Patients allocated to the standard of care group received 28 daily fractions of 1·8 Gy up to 50·4 Gy or 25 fractions of 2·0 Gy up to 50·0 Gy (per physician discretion or hospital policy), with concomitant twice-daily oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 followed by total mesorectal excision and, if stipulated by hospital policy, adjuvant chemotherapy with eight cycles of CAPOX or 12 cycles of FOLFOX4. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-related treatment failure, defined as the first occurrence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, new primary colorectal tumour, or treatment-related death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed by intention to treat. This study is registered with the EudraCT, 2010-023957-12, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01558921, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between June 21, 2011, and June 2, 2016, 920 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment, of whom 912 were eligible (462 in the experimental group; 450 in the standard of care group). Median follow-up was 4·6 years (IQR 3·5-5·5). At 3 years after randomisation, the cumulative probability of disease-related treatment failure was 23·7% (95% CI 19·8-27·6) in the experimental group versus 30·4% (26·1-34·6) in the standard of care group (hazard ratio 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·95; p=0·019). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse event during preoperative therapy in both groups was diarrhoea (81 [18%] of 460 patients in the experimental group and 41 [9%] of 441 in the standard of care group) and neurological toxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy in the standard of care group (16 [9%] of 187 patients). Serious adverse events occurred in 177 (38%) of 460 participants in the experimental group and, in the standard of care group, in 87 (34%) of 254 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and in 64 (34%) of 187 with adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment-related deaths occurred in four participants in the experimental group (one cardiac arrest, one pulmonary embolism, two infectious complications) and in four participants in the standard of care group (one pulmonary embolism, one neutropenic sepsis, one aspiration, one suicide due to severe depression). INTERPRETATION: The observed decreased probability of disease-related treatment failure in the experimental group is probably indicative of the increased efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy as opposed to adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. Therefore, the experimental treatment can be considered as a new standard of care in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. FUNDING: Dutch Cancer Foundation, Swedish Cancer Society, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and Spanish Clinical Research Network.

Bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) molecules are designed to engage and activate cytotoxic T cells to kill tumor cells. Little is known about their biodistribution in immunocompetent settings. Methods: To explore their pharmacokinetics and the role of the immune cells, BiTE molecules were radiolabeled with the PET isotope Zr-89 and studied in immunocompetent and immunodeficient mouse models. Results: PET images and ex vivo biodistribution in immunocompetent mice with [Zr-89]Zr-DFO-N-suc-muS110, targeting mouse CD3 (dissociation constant [K-D], 2.9 nM) and mouse epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM; K-D, 21 nM), and with [Zr-89]Zr-DFO-N-suc-hyS110, targeting only mouse CD3 (K-D, 2.9 nM), showed uptake in the tumor, spleen, and other lymphoid organs, whereas the human-specific control BiTE [Zr-89]Zr-DFO-N-suc-AMG 110 showed similar tumor uptake but lacked spleen uptake. [Zr-89]Zr-DFO-N-suc-muS110 spleen uptake was lower in immunodeficient than in immunocompetent mice. After repeated administration of nonradiolabeled muS110 to immunocompetent mice, Zr-89-muS110 uptake in the spleen and other lymphoid tissues decreased and was comparable to uptake in immunodeficient mice, indicating saturation of CD3 binding sites. Autoradiography and immunohistochemistry demonstrated colocalization of [Zr-89]Zr-DFO-N-suc-muS110 and [Zr-89]Zr-DFO-N-suc-hyS110 with CD3-positive T cells in the tumor and spleen but not with EpCAM expression. Also, uptake in the duodenum correlated with a high incidence of T cells. Conclusion: [Zr-89]Zr-DFO-N-suc-muS110 biodistribution is dependent mainly on the T-cell-targeting arm, with a limited contribution from its second arm, targeting EpCAM. These findings highlight the need for extensive biodistribution studies of novel bispecific constructs, as the results might have implications for their respective drug development and clinical translation.

In treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), confirmation of somatostatin receptor expression withSeven patients with in total 89 lesions completed four infusions of 7.4 GBq [Response to PRRT with [

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have substantially changed the field of oncology over the past few years. ICIs offer an alternative treatment strategy by exploiting the patients’ immune system, resulting in a T cell mediated anti-tumor response. These therapies are effective in multiple different tumor types. Unfortunately, a substantial group of patients do not respond to ICIs. Molecular imaging, using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), can provide non-invasive whole-body visualization of tumor and immune cell characteristics and might support patient selection or response evaluations for ICI therapies. In this review, recent studies with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET imaging, imaging of immune checkpoints and imaging of immune cells will be discussed. These studies are until now mainly exploratory, but the first results suggest that molecular imaging biomarkers could have a role in the evaluation of ICI therapy.

Purpose:To assess the efficacy of olaparib, a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) in patients with tumors with BRCA1/2 mutations, regardless of histologic tumor type.Patients and Methods:Patients with treatment-refractory BRCA1/2-mutated cancer were included for treatment with off-label olaparib 300 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), patients with treatment-refractory solid malignancies receive off-label drugs based on tumor molecular profiles while whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is performed on baseline tumor biopsies. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit (CB; defined as objective response or stable disease ≥ 16 weeks according to RECIST 1.1). Per protocol patients were enrolled using a Simon-like two-stage model.Results:Twenty-four evaluable patients with nine different tumor types harboring BRCA1/2 mutations were included, 58% had CB from treatment with olaparib. CB was observed in patients with complete loss of function (LoF) of BRCA1/2, while 73% of patients with biallelic BRCA LoF had CB. In 17 patients with and seven without current labeled indication, 10 and four patients had CB, respectively. Treatment resistance in four patients with biallelic loss might be explained by an additional oncogenic driver which was discovered by WGS, including Wnt pathway activation, FGFR amplification, and CDKN2A loss, in three tumor types.Conclusions:These data indicate that using PARPis is a promising treatment strategy for patients with non–BRCA-associated histologies harboring biallelic BRCA LoF. WGS allows to accurately detect complete LoF of BRCA and homologous repair deficiency (HRD) signature as well as oncogenic drivers that may contribute to resistance, using a single assay.

Background: Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) are an aggressive subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Advanced EP-NEC is generally treated with platinum-based cytotoxic regimens, but progressive disease occurs rapidly, resulting in a poor prognosis. Genetic alterations in the mammalian target for rapamycin (mTOR) pathway have been identified in NEN, providing a rationale for treatment with the mTOR-inhibitor everolimus. Methods: A prospective phase 2 single-arm study included patients with advanced EP-NEC from three Dutch NEN expertise centres between March 2016 and January 2020. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in combination with daily everolimus 7.5 mg for a maximum of six cycles, followed by maintenance everolimus until disease progression. Primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), defined as the sum of overall response rate (ORR) plus the rate of stable disease according to RECIST 1.1, assessed at 9-week intervals. Toxicity was evaluated according to CTCAE version 5.0. Results: Thirty-nine patients, with a median age of 64 years (range: 28–74), of whom 20 (51%) were male, were enrolled. DCR was 82.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66.4–92.4), with an ORR of 58.9% (CI: 42.1–74.4). Median duration of response was 6.4 (CI: 5.8–7.0) months and median progression-free survival was 6.0 (CI: 4.3–7.8) months. Three patients (8%) had durable responses lasting > 12 months. Median overall survival was 8.7 (CI: 7.8–9.6) months. Most common grade 3/4 toxicities were haematological (36%) and renal (21%). Conclusion: Everolimus in combination with cisplatin is an effective first-line treatment option for advanced EP-NEC, especially in highly selected patients. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02695459, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02695459 .

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has reinvigorated the field of immuno-oncology. These monoclonal antibody-based therapies allow the immune system to recognize and eliminate malignant cells. This has resulted in improved survival of patients across several tumor types. However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy therefore predictive biomarkers are important. There are only a few Food and Drug Administration-approved biomarkers to select patients for immunotherapy. These biomarkers do not consider the heterogeneity of tumor characteristics across lesions within a patient. New molecular imaging tracers allow for whole-body visualization with positron emission tomography (PET) of tumor and immune cell characteristics, and drug distribution, which might guide treatment decision making. Here, we summarize recent developments in molecular imaging of immune checkpoint molecules, such as PD-L1, PD-1, CTLA-4, and LAG-3. We discuss several molecular imaging approaches of immune cell subsets and briefly summarize the role of FDG-PET for evaluating cancer immunotherapy. The main focus is on developments in clinical molecular imaging studies, next to preclinical studies of interest given their potential translation to the clinic.

Bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) molecules exert antitumor activity by binding one arm to CD3 on cytotoxic T cells and the other arm to a tumor-associated antigen. Methods: We generated a fully mouse cross-reactive mesothelin-targeted BiTE molecule that is genetically fused to an Fc-domain for half-life extension, and we evaluated the biodistribution and tumor targeting of a (89)Zr-labeled mesothelin half-life–extended (HLE) molecule in 4T1 breast cancer–bearing syngeneic mice with PET. The biodistribution of 50 μg of (89)Zr-mesothelin HLE BiTE was studied over time by PET imaging in BALB/c mice and revealed uptake in tumor and lymphoid tissues with an elimination half-life of 63.4 h. Results: Compared with a nontargeting (89)Zr-control HLE BiTE, the (89)Zr-mesothelin HLE BiTE showed a 2-fold higher tumor uptake and higher uptake in lymphoid tissues. Uptake in the tumor colocalized with mesothelin expression, whereas uptake in the spleen colocalized with CD3 expression. Evaluation of the effect of protein doses on the biodistribution and tumor targeting of (89)Zr-mesothelin HLE BiTE revealed for all dose groups that uptake in the spleen was faster than in the tumor (day 1 vs. day 5). The lowest dose, 10 μg, of (89)Zr-mesothelin HLE BiTE had higher spleen uptake and faster blood clearance than the higher doses, 50 and 200 μg. (89)Zr-mesothelin HLE BiTE tumor uptake was similar at all doses. Conclusion: The mesothelin HLE BiTE showed specific tumor uptake, and both arms contributed to the biodistribution profile. These findings support the potential for clinical translation of HLE BiTE molecules.

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are antibodies that bind two distinct epitopes to cancer.. For use in oncology, one bsAb has been approved and 57 bsAbs are in clinical trials, none of which has reached phase 3. These bsAbs show great variability in design and mechanism of action. The various designs are often linked to the mechanisms of actions. The majority of bsAbs engage immune cells to destroy tumor cells. However, some bsAbs are also used to deliver payloads to tumors or to block tumor signaling pathways. This review provides insight into the choice of construct for bsAbs, summarizes the clinical development of bsAbs in oncology and identifies subsequent challenges. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Rationale: Mesothelin targeted thorium-227 conjugate (227Th-MSLN) is a novel targeted alpha therapy developed to treat mesothelin overexpressing cancers. We radiolabeled the same antibody-chelator conjugate with zirconium-89 (89Zr-MSLN) to evaluate if positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 89Zr-MSLN matches with 227Th-MSLN tumor uptake, biodistribution, and antitumor activity.Experimental design: Serial PET imaging with protein doses of 4, 20, or 40 μg 89Zr-MSLN and 89Zr-control was performed up to 168 h post tracer injection (pi) in high (HT29-MSLN) and low (BxPc3) mesothelin expressing human tumor-bearing nude mice. 89Zr-MSLN and 227Th-MSLN ex vivo tumor uptake and biodistribution were compared at 6 time-points in HT29-MSLN and in medium mesothelin expressing (OVCAR-3) tumor-bearing mice. 89Zr-MSLN PET imaging was performed before 227Th-MSLN treatment in HT29-MSLN and BxPc3 tumor-bearing mice.Results: 89Zr-MSLN PET imaging showed mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) in HT29-MSLN tumors of 2.2 ± 0.5. Ex vivo tumor uptake was 10.6% ± 2.4% injected dose per gram (%ID/g) at 168 h. 89Zr-MSLN tumor uptake was higher than uptake of 89Zr-control (P = 0.0043). 89Zr-MSLN and 227Th-MSLN showed comparable tumor uptake and biodistribution in OVCAR-3 and HT29-MSLN tumor-bearing mice. SUVmean was 1.8-fold higher in HT29-MSLN than in BxPc3 tumors, matching with stronger 227Th-MSLN antitumor activity.Conclusion: 89Zr-MSLN PET imaging reflected mesothelin expression and matched with 227Th-MSLN tumor uptake, biodistribution, and antitumor activity. Our data support the clinical exploration of 89Zr-MSLN PET imaging together with 227Th-MSLN therapy, both using the same antibody-chelator conjugate.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC) is a poorly understood disease with limited treatment options. A better understanding of this disease would greatly benefit from the availability of representative preclinical models. Here, we present the potential of tumor organoids, three-dimensional cultures of tumor cells, to model GEP-NEC. We established three GEP-NEC organoid lines, originating from the stomach and colon, and characterized them using DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Organoids largely resembled the original tumor in expression of synaptophysin, chromogranin and Ki-67. Models derived from tumors containing both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components were at risk of overgrowth by non-neuroendocrine tumor cells. Organoids were derived from patients treated with cisplatin and everolimus and for the three patients studied, organoid chemosensitivity paralleled clinical response. We demonstrate the feasibility of establishing NEC organoid lines and their potential applications. Organoid culture has the potential to greatly extend the repertoire of preclinical models for GEP-NEC, supporting drug development for this difficult-to-treat tumor type.

Introduction: Since current studies on locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) mainly report from single, high-volume centers, it is unclear if outcomes can be translated to daily clinical practice. This study provides treatment strategies and clinical outcomes within a multicenter cohort of unselected patients with LAPC.Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with LAPC according to Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group criteria, were prospectively included in 14 centers from April 2015 until December 2017. A centralized expert panel reviewed response according to RECIST v1.1 and potential surgical resectability. Primary outcome was median overall survival (mOS), stratified for primary treatment strategy.Results: Overall, 422 patients were included, of whom 77% (n = 326) received chemotherapy. The majority started with FOLFIRINOX (77%, 252/326) with a median of six cycles (IQR 4-10). Gemcitabine monotherapy was given to 13% (41/326) of patients and nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine to 10% (33/326), with a median of two (IQR 3-5) and three (IQR 3-5) cycles respectively. The mOS of the entire cohort was 10 months (95%CI 9-11). In patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine monotherapy, or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, mOS was 14 (95%CI 13-15), 9 (95%CI 8-10), and 9 months (95%CI 8-10), respectively. A resection was performed in 13% (32/252) of patients after FOLFIRINOX, resulting in a mOS of 23 months (95%CI 12-34).Conclusion: This multicenter unselected cohort of patients with LAPC resulted in a 14 month mOS and a 13% resection rate after FOLFIRINOX. These data put previous results in perspective, enable us to inform patients with more accurate survival numbers and will support decision-making in clinical practice. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Contains fulltext : 239089.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: The treatment options for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) have improved in recent years and consequently survival has increased. It is unknown, however, if elderly patients benefit from these improvements in therapy. With the ongoing aging of the patient population and an increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer, this patient group becomes more relevant. This study aims to clarify the association between increasing age, treatment and overall survival in patients with LAPC. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of a multicenter registry including consecutive patients with LAPC, who were registered in 14 centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (April 2015-December 2017). Patients were divided in three groups according to age (

Background Approximately 80% of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are treated with chemotherapy, of whom approximately 10% undergo a resection. Cohort studies investigating local tumor ablation with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have reported a promising overall survival of 26–34 months when given in a multimodal setting. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of RFA in combination with chemotherapy in patients with LAPC are lacking. Methods The “Pancreatic Locally Advanced Unresectable Cancer Ablation” (PELICAN) trial is an international multicenter superiority RCT, initiated by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG). All patients with LAPC according to DPCG criteria, who start with FOLFIRINOX or (nab-paclitaxel/)gemcitabine, are screened for eligibility. Restaging is performed after completion of four cycles of FOLFIRINOX or two cycles of (nab-paclitaxel/)gemcitabine (i.e., 2 months of treatment), and the results are assessed within a nationwide online expert panel. Eligible patients with RECIST stable disease or objective response, in whom resection is not feasible, are randomized to RFA followed by chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. In total, 228 patients will be included in 16 centers in The Netherlands and four other European centers. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, RECIST response, CA 19.9 and CEA response, toxicity, quality of life, pain, costs, and immunomodulatory effects of RFA. Discussion The PELICAN RCT aims to assess whether the combination of chemotherapy and RFA improves the overall survival when compared to chemotherapy alone, in patients with LAPC with no progression of disease following 2 months of systemic treatment. Trial registration Dutch Trial RegistryNL4997. Registered on December 29, 2015. ClinicalTrials.govNCT03690323. Retrospectively registered on October 1, 2018

Click here to listen to the Podcast BACKGROUND: Form 1 of the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) serves to grade therapies with curative intent. Hitherto only few trials with curative intent have been field tested using form 1. We aimed to evaluate the applicability of the scale and to assess the reasonableness of the generated scores in early colon cancer, in order to identify shortcomings that may be rectified in future amendments. METHODS: Adjuvant studies were identified in PubMed, Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency registration sites, as well as ESMO and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were graded using form 1 of the ESMO-MCBS V.1.1 and field tested by ESMO Colorectal Cancer Faculty. Shortcomings of the scale were identified and evaluated. RESULTS: Eighteen of 57 trials and 7 out of 14 meta-analyses identified met criteria for ESMO-MCBS V.1.1 grading. In stage III colon cancer, randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses of modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy versus surgery scored ESMO-MCBS grade A and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses comprising oxaliplatin added to this 5-FU backbone showed a more modest additional overall survival benefit (grade A and B). For stage II colon cancer, the findings are less consistent. The fluoropyrimidine trials in stage II were graded 'no evaluable benefit' but the most recent meta-analysis demonstrated a 5.4% survival advantage after 8 years follow-up (grade A). RCTs and a meta-analysis adding oxaliplatin demonstrated no added benefit. Exploratory toxicity evaluation and annotation was problematic given inconsistent toxicity reporting and limited results of late toxicity. Field testers (n=37) reviewed the scores, 25 confirmed their reasonableness, 12 found them mostly reasonable. Moreover, they identified the inability of crediting improved convenience in non-inferiority trials as a shortcoming. CONCLUSION: Form 1 of the ESMO-MCBS V.1.1 provided very reasonable grading for adjuvant colon cancer studies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes for patients with advanced cancers, and results in increasing numbers of long-term survivors. For registration studies, progression-free survival and disease-free survival often serve as primary endpoints. This requires repeated computed tomography (CT) scans for tumour imaging which might lead to major radiation exposure. To determine this, all immune checkpoint inhibitors trials that led to FDA approval were retrieved up to July 29, 2019. From the available protocols, imaging modalities and schedules used in each trial were identified. The anticipated cumulative number of scans made after 1, 3, 5, and 10 years study participation were calculated. The percentage of lifetime attributable cancer risk was calculated using the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII report. Fifty-one trials were identified, from which 39 protocols were retrieved. Four were adjuvant trials. All protocols required repeated chest-abdomen imaging and specified CT scans as preferred imaging modality. Median calculated cumulative numbers of chest-abdomen CT scans after 1, 3, 5, and 10 years study participation were 7, 16, 24 and 46, respectively. For ages 20-70 years at study entry, the average lifetime attributable cancer risk after 1 year of study participation ranged from 1.11 to 0.40% for men and from 1.87 to 0.46% for women. At 10 years study participation, this risk increased to a range of 5.91 to 1.96% for men and 9.64 to 2.32% for women. Given high imaging radiation exposure for long-term survivors in current ICI trials an adaptive imaging interval and imaging termination rules should be considered for long-term survivors.

The Publisher regrets that errors had been introduced within the above mentioned article. The article is now correct online and in print. The Publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision is widely accepted as the standard of care for high-risk rectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy is advised in several international guidelines, although the survival benefit remains unclear and compliance is poor. The current multidisciplinary approach has led to major improvements in local control, yet the occurrence of distant metastases has not decreased accordingly. The combination of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and chemotherapy in the waiting period before surgery might have several benefits, including higher compliance, downstaging and better effect of systemic therapy. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, international multicentre randomized phase III trial. High-risk rectal cancer patients were randomized to SCRT followed by chemotherapy (6 cycles CAPOX or alternatively 9 cycles FOLFOX4) and subsequent surgery, or long-course radiotherapy (25-28 x 2-1.8 Gy) with concomitant capecitabine followed by surgery and optional postoperative chemotherapy (8 cycles CAPOX or 12 cycles FOLFOX4) according to local institutions' policy. The primary endpoint is time to disease related treatment failure. Here, we report the compliance, toxicity and postoperative complications in both study groups. Findings: Between June 2011 and June 2016, 920 patients were enrolled. Of these, 901 were evaluable (460 in the experimental arm and 441 in the standard arm). All patients in the experimental arm received 5 x 5 Gy radiotherapy, and 84% of all patients received at least 75% of the prescribed chemotherapy. In the standard arm, the compliance for CRT was 93% and 58% for postoperative chemotherapy. Toxicity >= grade 3 occurred in 48% of patients in the experimental arm, compared to 25% of patients in the standard arm during preoperative treatment and 35% of patients during postoperative chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences in surgical procedures or postoperative complications were observed. Interpretation: High compliance (84%) of preoperative systemic treatment could be achieved with the experimental approach. Although considerable toxicity was observed during preoperative therapy, this did not lead to differences in surgical procedures or postoperative complications. Longer follow-up time is needed to assess the primary endpoint and related outcomes. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 147 (2020) 75-83

Background Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. Best practices for the use of chemotherapy, enzyme replacement therapy, and biliary drainage have been identified but their implementation in daily clinical practice is often suboptimal. We hypothesized that a nationwide program to enhance implementation of these best practices in pancreatic cancer care would improve survival and quality of life. Methods/design PACAP-1 is a nationwide multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled superiority trial. In a per-center stepwise and randomized manner, best practices in pancreatic cancer care regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and metal biliary stents are implemented in all 17 Dutch pancreatic centers and their regional referral networks during a 6-week initiation period. Per pancreatic center, one multidisciplinary team functions as reference for the other centers in the network. Key best practices were identified from the literature, 3 years of data from existing nationwide registries within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP), and national expert meetings. The best practices follow the Dutch guideline on pancreatic cancer and the current state of the literature, and can be executed within daily clinical practice. The implementation process includes monitoring, return visits, and provider feedback in combination with education and reminders. Patient outcomes and compliance are monitored within the PACAP registries. Primary outcome is 1-year overall survival (for all disease stages). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, 3- and 5-year overall survival, and guideline compliance. An improvement of 10% in 1-year overall survival is considered clinically relevant. A 25-month study duration was chosen, which provides 80% statistical power for a mortality reduction of 10.0% in the 17 pancreatic cancer centers, with a required sample size of 2142 patients, corresponding to a 6.6% mortality reduction and 4769 patients nationwide. Discussion The PACAP-1 trial is designed to evaluate whether a nationwide program for enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care can improve 1-year overall survival and quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03513705. Trial opened for accrual on 22th May 2018.

Molecularly targeted therapeutic and imaging strategies directed at aberrant signaling pathways in pancreatic tumor cells may improve the poor outcome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Therefore, relevant molecular targets need to be identified. Methods: We collected publicly available expression profiles of patient-derived normal pancreatic tissue (n = 77) and PDA samples (n = 103). Functional genomic messenger RNA profiling was applied to predict target upregulation on the protein level. We prioritized these targets based on current status of preclinical therapeutic and imaging evaluation in PDA. Results: We identified 213 significantly upregulated proteins in PDA compared with normal pancreatic tissue. We prioritized mucin-1, mesothelin, g-glutamyltransferase 5, and cathepsin-E as the most interesting targets, because studies already demonstrated their potential for both therapeutic and imaging strategies in literature. Conclusion: This study can assist clinicians and drug developers in deciding which theranostic targets should be taken for further clinical evaluation in PDA.

T cell enhancing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are effective across several tumor types in a subset of patients. Insights into systemic localization of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells might support early treatment decisions. To address this, we performed a PET imaging study with a zirconium-89 (89Zr) labeled one-armed CD8-specific antibody 89ZED88082A to assess tracer performance, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) before and during treatment. Here we report preliminary data on uptake in tumor lesions before ICI. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that may benefit from ICI are eligible. In part A (imaging before treatment) and part B (imaging before and during treatment), 37 MBq (1 mCi) 89ZED88082A is administered with unlabeled one-armed antibody CED88004S to vary total protein dose. PET images are acquired at up to 4 time points: 1 h, and days (d) 2, 4, 7 post-injection followed by a tumor biopsy for CD8 immunohistochemistry and autoradiography (NCT04029181). Subsequently, patients receive atezolizumab (NCT02478099) or standard of care nivolumab ± ipilimumab. Tumor and lymph node 89ZED88082A uptake are assessed as (geometric mean) maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), in other organs as SUVmean. Serum 89ZED88082A/CED88004S levels are measured for PK. Tumor response is according to (i)RECIST1.1. Results: For pretreatment imaging results, 32 patients (9 part A, 23 part B) were evaluable; 3 received 4 mg total tracer protein dose, 29 received 10 mg. No tracer infusion-related reactions occurred. Here we show results on d2 PET imaging with 10 mg protein dose, which was considered optimal based on superior 89Zr blood pool activity, clinical feasibility and serum antibody PK with a half-life of 28.6 h. 89ZED88082A uptake was observed within 1 h in spleen, and strong d2 imaging signal was seen across lymphoid organs including spleen (\bar{x}$ SUVmean 47.2), lymph nodes (SUVmax 4.2), bone marrow (\bar{x}$ SUVmean 5.0), small bowel and Waldeyer's ring. 89ZED88082A tumor uptake was seen at all main metastatic organ sites (overall lesion SUVmax 5.5, range 0.6-30.9) and varied across patients (\bar{x}$ per patient SUVmax 5.4, IQR 3.8-7.4). Higher tumor uptake showed a trend with better response (p=0.059) and longer PFS (p=0.033). Tumor uptake was higher in patients with mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) than MMR proficient tumors (SUVmax 9.3 vs 4.9, p Citation Format: Laura Kist de Ruijter, Pim P. van de Donk, Jahlisa S. Hooiveld-Noeken, Danique Giesen, Alexander Ungewickell, Bernard M. Fine, Simon P. Williams, Sandra M. Sanabria Bohorquez, Mahesh Yadav, Hartmut Koeppen, Jing Jing, Sebastian Guelman, Mark T. Lin, Michael J. Mamounas, Jeffrey Eastham, Patrick K. Kimes, Andor W. Glaudemans, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge, Jourik A. Gietema, Carolina P. Schröder, Wim Timens, Mathilde Jalving, Sjoerd Elias, Sjoukje F. Oosting, Derk J. de Groot, Elisabeth G. de Vries. 89ZED88082A PET imaging to visualize CD8+ T cells in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB037.

Background Patients with curable esophageal cancer (EC) who proceed beyond the original Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) eligibility criteria are also treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study assessed the effect that extending the CROSS eligibility criteria for nCRT has on treatment-related toxicity and overall survival (OS) in EC. Methods The study enrolled 161 patients with locally advanced EC (T1N1-3/T2-4aN0-3/M0) treated with the CROSS schedule followed by esophagectomy. Group 1 consisted of 89 patients who met the CROSS criteria, and group 2 consisted of 72 patients who met the extended eligibility criteria, i.e. a tumor length greater than 8 cm (n = 24), more than 10% weight loss (n = 35), more than 2–4 cm extension in the stomach (n = 21), celiac lymph node metastasis (n = 13), and/or age over 75 years (n = 2). The study assessed the differences in nCRT-associated toxicity [National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3] and 90-day postoperative mortality. Moreover, the prognostic value for OS was assessed with multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results No difference was found in nCRT-associated toxicity (P = 0.117), postoperative complications (P = 0.783), and 90-day mortality (P = 0.492). The OS differed significantly (P = 0.004), with a median of 37.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.4–64.2 months] for group 1 and 17.2 months (95% CI 13.8–20.7 months) for group 2. Pathologic N stage (P = 0.023), pathologic T stage (P = 0.043), and group 2 (P = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions Extension of the CROSS study eligibility criteria for nCRT did not affect nCRT-associated toxicity, postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality, but was prognostic for OS. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5797-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background Large-scale genetic tumor profiling can identify increasing numbers of potentially actionable molecular variants for which approved anti-cancer drugs are available. In daily practice, however, when patients with such variants are treated with drugs outside of their approved label, successes and failures are not systematically collected or shared. Methods We initiated the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), an innovative and adaptive precision oncology trial aimed at identifying signals of activity in cohorts of patients with defined tumor types and molecular variants, treated with anti-cancer drugs outside their approved label. Eligible patients have exhausted (or declined) standard therapies and have malignancies with potentially actionable variants for which no approved anti-cancer drugs are available. Results Here, we show an overall clinical benefit rate (defined as complete or partial response, or stable disease ≥16 weeks) of 34% in the first 215 treated patients. This comprised 136 patients who received targeted therapies, and 79 patients who received immunotherapy. Overall median clinical benefit duration was nine months (95% CI 8 – 11 months), including 26 patients with ongoing clinical benefit at data cutoff. The potential of DRUP was illustrated by the identification of a successful cohort of patients with microsatellite instable tumors receiving nivolumab, and a cohort of colorectal cancer patients with relatively low mutational load with limited clinical benefit from immunotherapy. Conclusions The DRUP hereby facilitates defined use of approved drugs beyond their label in (rare) cancer subgroups, identifies early signals of activity in these subgroups, accelerates clinical translation of new insights, and creates a publicly available knowledge-base for future decision making. Legal entity responsible for the study Netherlands Cancer Institute. Funding Hartwig Medical Foundation, Dutch Cancer Society, Barcode for Life, Roche, Novartis, MSD, GSK, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, BMS. Disclosure E.E. Voest: Research grant / Funding (self), Legally responsible for all contracts: All pharma. C. van Herpen: Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Regeneron; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi. M. Chalabi: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Netherlands Cancer Institute. E.F. Smit: Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (institution): Bayer; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Honoraria (institution): Novartis ; Honoraria (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (institution): Takeda; Honoraria (institution): Regeneron; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche Genentech; Honoraria (institution): Seattle Genetics. N. Mehra: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen-Cilag; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi. E. Cuppen: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Illumina; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: InteRNA Technologies; Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Hartwig Medical Foundation. H.M.W. Verheul: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Glycostem; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Lava Therapeutics. H. Gelderblom: Research grant / Funding (institution): Five Prime; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Deciphera; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): Debio; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Teva. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Purpose: Biodistribution of bispecific antibodies in patients is largely unknown. We therefore performed a feasibility study in 9 patients with advanced gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas to explore AMG 211 biodistribution (also known as MEDI-565), an approximately 55 kDa bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) directed against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) on tumor cells and cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) on T-cells. Experimental Design: 89Zr-labeled AMG 211 as tracer was administered alone or with cold AMG 211, for PET imaging before and/or during AMG 211 treatment. Results: Before AMG 211 treatment, the optimal imaging dose was 200-μg 89Zr-AMG 211 + 1,800-μg cold AMG 211. At 3 hours, the highest blood pool standardized uptake value (SUV)mean was 4.0, and tracer serum half-life was 3.3 hours. CD3-mediated uptake was clearly observed in CD3-rich lymphoid tissues including spleen and bone marrow (SUVmean 3.2 and 1.8, respectively), and the SUVmean decreased more slowly than in other healthy tissues. 89Zr-AMG 211 remained intact in plasma and was excreted predominantly via the kidneys in degraded forms. Of 43 visible tumor lesions, 37 were PET quantifiable, with a SUVmax of 4.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.7–4.4] at 3 hours using the optimal imaging dose. The tracer uptake differed between tumor lesions 5-fold within and 9-fold between patients. During AMG 211 treatment, tracer was present in the blood pool, whereas tumor lesions were not visualized, possibly reflecting target saturation. Conclusions: This first-in-human study shows high, specific 89Zr-AMG 211 accumulation in CD3-rich lymphoid tissues, as well as a clear, inter- and intraindividual heterogeneous tumor uptake.

Background Patients with a neuroendocrine tumour (NET) frequently have physical and psychosocial complaints. Aim of this study is to determine whether a web-based, personalised information and support system (WINS) reduces distress and/or improves patients’ perception of and satisfaction with information received. Methods Patients with NET, stratified for those newly diagnosed (

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis typically involves cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and if possible, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, a substantial percentage of patients never receive adjuvant chemotherapy because of postoperative complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be beneficial in this setting, so we assessed its feasibility and safety when used before cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC.METHODS: In this non-randomized, single-center, observational feasibility study, patients were scheduled to receive six cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin before cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Computed tomography was performed after the third and sixth chemotherapy cycles to evaluate tumor response, and patients underwent cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC if there were no pulmonary and/or hepatic metastases. Postoperative complications, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, were compared with those of a historic control group that received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.RESULTS: Of the 14 patients included in the study, 4 and 3 had to terminate neoadjuvant chemotherapy early because of toxicity and tumor progression, respectively. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC were performed in eight patients, and the timing and severity of complications were comparable to those of patients in the historic control group treated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.CONCLUSION: Patients with peritoneal metastases due to colorectal carcinoma can be treated safely with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before definitive therapy with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR 3905, registered on 20th march, 2013, http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3905.