1. Evaluating changes in marine communities that provide ecosystem services through comparative assessments of community indicators
- Author
-
Johanna J. Heymans, Jennifer L. Boldt, Scott I. Large, Didier Jouffre, Ibrahima Diallo, Gro I. van der Meeren, Morgane Travers-Trolet, F Borges Maria, Henn Ojaveer, Jorge Tam, Kristin N. Marshall, Marta Coll, Alida Bundy, Kristin M. Kleisner, Chiara Piroddi, Stephani G. Zador, Yunne-Jai Shin, Maria Angeles Torres, Christopher P. Lynam, Lynne J. Shannon, Maria J. Juan Jordá, Didier Gascuel, K. Tsagarakis, Clive Fox, Sea Around Us Project, University of British Columbia (UBC), Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), UMR 212 EME 'écosystèmes marins exploités' (EME), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Lowestoft Laboratory, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Population Ecology Division, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Marine Research Institute and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Pacific Biological Station (PBS), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Instituto Português de Investigação do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA), Centre National des Sciences Halieutiques de Boussoura (CNSHB), Scottish Marine Institute, Écologie et santé des écosystèmes (ESE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST, Scottish Association for Marine Science, Marine Research Division, AZTI, Earth to Ocean Research Group (SFU), Simon Fraser University (SFU.ca), Ecologie des systèmes marins côtiers (Ecosym), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1), School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Water Resources Unit [Ispra], JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES), European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] (JRC)-European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] (JRC), Instituto del Mar del Peru (IMARPE), Centro Oceanográfico de Cádiz, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Coastal Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Fisheries Laboratory, Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Hellenic Center for Marine Research (HCMR), Hjort Centre for Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Alaska Fisheries Science Center (AFSC), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institute of Coastal Research, Department of Aquatic Resources, and Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)-Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)
- Subjects
Community metric ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,fishing impacts ,Geography, Planning and Development ,Population ,Context (language use) ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Ecological indicator ,Ecosystem services ,Comparative approach ,IndiSeas ,Abundance (ecology) ,Marine ecosystem ,Ecosystem ,14. Life underwater ,education ,Nature and Landscape Conservation ,Global and Planetary Change ,Biomass (ecology) ,education.field_of_study ,Ecology ,business.industry ,Environmental resource management ,ecological indicator ,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) ,Fishing impacts ,Geography ,13. Climate action ,comparative approach ,business ,community metric - Abstract
We would like to thank the IndiSeas Working Group, endorsed by IOC-UNESCO (www.ioc-unesco.org) and the European Network of Excellence Euroceans (www.eur-oceans.eu). KMK was supported by Conservation International and the Sea Around Us project, a collaboration between The University of British Columbia and The Pew Charitable Trusts. MC was partially supported by the EC Marie Curie CIG grant to BIOWEB and the Spanish Research Program Ramon y Cajal. LJS was supported through the South African Research Chair Initiative, funded through the South African Department of Science and Technology (DST) and administered by the South African National Research Foundation (NRF). YJS and MIT were supported by the French project EMIBIOS (FRB, contract no. APP-SCEN-2010-11). US and YS were also funded by the European collaborative project MEECE - Marine Ecosystem Evolution in a Changing Environment - (FP7, Contract no. 212085). CPL was supported by Defra project MF1228 (From Physics to Fisheries) and DEVOTES (DEVelopment of innovative Tools for understanding marine biodiversity and assessing good Environmental Status) funded by EU FP7 (grant Agreement no. 308392), www.devotes-project.eu. GIvdM was partially supported by the Norwegian Nature Index programme and the Institute of Marine Research, Norway. HO was funded was funded by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (grant SF0180005s10). MAT was funded by a predoctoral FPI fellowship from the Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO). MJJJ was supported by the EC Marie Curie IOF Grant, PIOF-GA-2013-628116. We acknowledge all those who conducted surveys to collect the data used in this study.; Fisheries provide critical provisioning services, especially given increasing human population. Understanding where marine communities are declining provides an indication of ecosystems of concern and highlights potential conflicts between seafood provisioning from wild fisheries and other ecosystem services. Here we use the nonparametric statistic, Kendall's tau, to assess trends in biomass of exploited marine species across a range of ecosystems. The proportion of 'Non-Declining Exploited Species' (NDES) is compared among ecosystems and to three community-level indicators that provide a gauge of the ability of a marine ecosystem to function both in provisioning and as a regulating service: survey-based mean trophic level, proportion of predatory fish, and mean life span. In some ecosystems, NDES corresponds to states and temporal trajectories of the community indicators, indicating deteriorating conditions in both the exploited community and in the overall community. However differences illustrate the necessity of using multiple ecological indicators to reflect the state of the ecosystem. For each ecosystem, we discuss patterns in NDES with respect to the community-level indicators and present results in the context of ecosystem-specific drivers. We conclude that using NDES requires context-specific supporting information in order to provide guidance within a management framework. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2015