Search

Background: The potential for pain at home in children following day case surgery has long been recognized. Pain has also been associated with behavioral disturbances and sleep disruption in children following surgery and may also impact negatively on recovery, parental and patient satisfaction, family life, healthcare use, and have an economic cost., Aim: To investigate the prevalence of pain at home, and its consequences, in children following two types of short stay surgery across eight pediatric centers in the UK in an observational cohort study. Reporting of the study was done in adherence with STROBE guidelines., Method: Two hundred and forty-one children undergoing either Tonsillectomy with or without Adenoidectomy (T's ± A's) or Orchidopexy surgery (either by Open or Laparoscopic) were recruited. Data collection was via three structured telephone interviews [Day (D) 2, 7 and 14] conducted from a clinical research facility. The normal clinical practices of the centers involved in the study were not altered in any way. Outcomes studied were (i) Pain incidence and severity; (ii) Associated consequences-incidence of psychological disturbances, unplanned use of healthcare services, and social/economic cost to families; and (iii) Comparative pain and associated outcomes for two types of surgery (T's ± A's vs Orchidopexy)., Results: The incidence of pain following both operative models was high though it differed between the two groups. In the T's ± A's group, the incidence of pain was high throughout the study period (D2 90.1%, D3-7 88.1%, D8-14 61.8%). The Orchidopexy group demonstrated a similar pattern, though with decreased rates (D2 70.4%, D3-7 34.7%, D8-14 17.1%). Both groups showed similar patterns for the rates of behavioral disturbances (T's & A's: D2 76%, D3-7 73%, D8-14 30% and Orchidopexy: D2 37%, D3-7 20%, D8-14 10%). Seventy percent of the families reported unplanned healthcare use with pain the primary reason in 79% of these., Conclusions: The prevalence of pain at home, and its potential associated consequences, is high following short stay surgery in children in the UK. In both groups, high incidences were seen for longer periods than is commonly perceived. These findings were consistent between the centers involved suggesting that this is a significant national healthcare issue with potential short- and long-term consequences for the child, their family, and health services., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To investigate the safety of a novel, miniaturized, monoplane transesophageal echocardiography probe (mTEE) and its potential as a hemodynamic monitoring tool., Design: This was a retrospective analysis of the clinical evaluation of a disposable mTEE in ventilated patients with severe cardiogenic shock requiring hemodynamic support. mTEE assessment was performed by operators with mixed levels of TEE training. Information on hemodynamic interventions based on mTEE findings was recorded., Setting: A tertiary university cardiac critical care unit., Participants: Male and female critical care patients admitted to the unit with severe hemodynamic instability., Interventions: Insertion of miniaturized disposable TEE probe and hemodynamic and other critical care interventions based on this and conventional monitoring., Measurements and Main Results: In 41 patients (51.2% female, 73.2% after cardiac surgery), hemodynamic support probe insertion was accomplished without major complications. A total of 195 mTEE studies were performed, resulting in changes in therapy in 37 (90.2%) patients based on mTEE findings, leading to an improvement in hemodynamic parameters in 33 (80.5%) patients. Right ventricular (RV) failure was diagnosed in 25 patients (67.6%) and mTEE had a direct therapeutic impact on management of RV failure in 17 patients (68 %)., Conclusions: Insertion and operation of a novel, miniaturized transoesophageal echocardiography probe can be performed for up to 72 hours without major complications. Repeated assessment using this device provides complementary information to invasive monitoring in the majority of patients and has an impact on hemodynamic management., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)