1. Head-to-Head Comparison of Flow Reduction between Fibered and Non-Fibered Pushable Coils
- Author
-
Jong-Tae Yoon, Boseong Kwon, Joon Ho Choi, Sun Moon Hwang, Mihyeon Kim, Sungbin Hwang, Yunsun Song, and Deok Hee Lee
- Subjects
embolization ,coils ,angiography ,flow rate ,packing density ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
Purpose To compare the embolization effects of a non-fibered pushable coil with a conventional fibered pushable coil in an in vitro bench-top experiment. Materials and Methods A simplified vascular phantom with 4 channels (1 for the non-fibered coil, 1 for the fibered coil, and 2 for continuous circuit flow) was used. A single coil of the longest length was inserted to evaluate the effect of single-coil embolization, and 3 consecutive coils were inserted to assess the effect of multiple-coil embolization. Post-embolization angiography was performed to obtain flow variables (time to peak [TTP], relative peak intensity [rPI], and angiographic flow reduction score [AFRS]) from time density curves. The packing densities of the two coil types were calculated, and the AFRS of each channel was determined by dividing the TTP by the rPI. Results When inserting a single coil, the conventional fibered coil demonstrated better flow reduction, as indicated by a higher AFRS (25.6 vs. 17.4, P=0.034). However, the non-fibered coil exhibited a significantly higher packing density (12.9 vs. 2.4, P=0.001). Similar trends were observed with multiple coils. Conclusion The conventional fibered pushable coil showed better flow reduction efficiency, while the non-fibered pushable coil had a higher packing density, likely due to the flexibility of the coil loops. A better understanding of the distinct characteristics of different pushable coils can enhance the outcomes of various vascular embolization.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF